Peniscoin Price Today & AI Analysis

PENISSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 10, 2026

$0.000121

-7.59% 24h

Contract

Live

JE3HT7SbCgXDQWV6xp3oiiAisDzq4HyZ8wyEVBDCs45Z

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,720

Market cap

$121,340

At a $1M market cap, $PENIS would be $0.001000 (8.24x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is PENIS a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 21

Transfer fee

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 3% fee and the owner can still raise it.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token blocks a sell

Transfer fee

3%Every buy and sell · can be raised

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about PENIS

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

MUSHUMushu$0.003649-0.2%MC $558.5K

CATCOINCatcoin$0.0₄4691-15.5%MC $46.9K

backpackBear 89 Backpack$0.0₄1347-17.0%MC $13.5K

TCARTRENCH CAR$0.0₄2668-7.0%MC $26.6K

hyENAhyENA$0.0₄2810+19.3%MC $28.1K

BIRBMoonbirds$0.0944+28.0%MC $26.90M

Peniscoin: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-10 00:16 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$47,694.00

How concentrated is Peniscoin ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Peniscoin?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Peniscoin liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-10 00:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $47,694.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-10 00:16 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 10, 12:16 AM UTC

FDV

$1,146,305

Liquidity

$47,694.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

Peniscoin (PENIS) is a micro-cap, extremely low-liquidity Solana meme token trading on a single Raydium CPMM pool (AXTq4...idnz). Price has exploded 2566% in the last 24h and the 3 available hourly candles show violent, near-vertical moves (e.g. a candle opening at $0.0000043 and closing near $0.00026, then ranging up to $0.0017). Total liquidity is just ~$47.69K against a fully diluted valuation of ~$1.15M, meaning the market is thin and highly manipulable. No holder or sniper data is available, which removes two of the most important due-diligence signals (distribution and early-buyer behavior) and materially raises uncertainty.

Key points

Only $47.69K total liquidity vs $1.15M FDV — a ~24x liquidity/FDV gap typical of illiquid, high-risk meme tokens
24h price change of +2566% driven by extreme intra-hour volatility (candle ranges spanning 2 orders of magnitude)
No holder distribution data and no sniper data available, obscuring concentration and early-buyer/insider risk entirely
Balanced but enormous 24h volume ($1.08M buy vs $1.02M sell) relative to liquidity, implying high turnover and wash-trading-like conditions on a shallow pool
Metadata fields (verified contract, update authority, mutable, master edition) are all 'unknown', preventing confirmation of rug-pull safeguards

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-48 hours

neutral

Given the token just posted a +2566% 24h move on a pool with only ~$47.7K liquidity, and the most recent 5m change is -18.6% while 1h is +162%, price action is dominated by extreme volatility rather than trend. A short-term bounce or continuation is plausible but a sharp mean-reversion / dump is equally or more likely given the thin liquidity base.

Target low

$0.0006

Target high

$0.0020

Support: $0.00098 (candle [3] low), $0.00015 (candle [2] low)
Resistance: $0.00172 (candle [3] high), $0.00121 (candle [2] high)

Medium term · 7-14 days

bearish

Meme tokens that experience parabolic 4-figure percentage moves on sub-$50K liquidity pools very frequently retrace sharply as early buyers and any concentrated holders take profit. Without holder or sniper data to confirm distribution health, the base expectation for a token with this liquidity/FDV mismatch is a fade back toward pre-spike levels unless sustained new buy volume and liquidity growth materialize.

Catalysts

Potential liquidity additions or CEX/DEX aggregator listings could sustain the move
Continued social/twitter-driven momentum could extend the rally short-term
Absence of new buyers or liquidity growth would likely trigger a fast reversal
Any large wallet (if concentrated, per unavailable holder data) dumping would crash price given shallow liquidity

Bullish factors

Strong 24h buy pressure (51.5% buy vs 48.5% sell) with more unique buyers (5,139) than sellers (3,704)
High trading activity (12,471 buys vs 9,235 sells in 24h) suggests active retail interest
Social presence via Twitter link indicates some community/marketing effort

Bearish factors

Liquidity of only ~$47.69K cannot support the $1.15M FDV without major slippage
+2566% 24h move with a -18.6% pullback in the most recent 5 minutes signals topping/whipsaw behavior
No confirmed mint/freeze authority renouncement or contract verification data
No holder concentration or sniper data available to rule out insider/whale dump risk
Extreme volatility (candle ranges spanning ~100x within a single hour) is characteristic of thin, easily manipulated pools

Confidence: low. Only 3 hourly candles are provided, no holder or sniper data exists, and metadata authority/verification fields are all unknown. This is a very small evidentiary base for a token exhibiting extreme, possibly manipulated volatility, so confidence in any directional call is low.

PENIS call history

Full track record →

Sep 10neutral@ $0.00115

24h—

7d—

30d-75.2%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: JE3HT7...s45Z
Total Supply: 999,995,091.32 PENIS

Key Risks

Extremely shallow liquidity (~$47.69K) relative to FDV (~$1.15M), creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Parabolic +2566% 24h price move with clear signs of momentum exhaustion (declining volume, -18.6% 5-minute reversal)
Total absence of holder distribution and sniper/insider data, preventing verification of concentration and dump risk
Unknown mint/freeze authority and contract verification status, leaving rug-pull potential unconfirmed but unaddressed

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle [1] (22:00 UTC) opened at $0.00000434, spiked to a high of $0.00033, dipped to a low of $0.00000412, and closed at $0.000261 on volume of $559K — an enormous single-hour range indicating a violent initial pump. Candle [2] (23:00 UTC) opened at $0.000261, ran up to a high of $0.00121, dropped to a low of $0.000154, and closed at $0.00110 on the highest volume of the set ($1.33M), showing continued parabolic advance with heavy two-way trading. Candle [3] (00:00 UTC) opened at $0.00110, pushed to a high of $0.00172, pulled back to a low of $0.00098, and closed at $0.00115 on lower volume ($395K), suggesting the initial momentum is decelerating and consolidating just above the prior close.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

All three available candles show successively higher closes ($0.000261 → $0.00110 → $0.00115), forming a short-term uptrend, but the deceleration in volume and range in the most recent candle plus the reported -18.6% 5-minute move suggest the uptrend is losing steam and may be topping out near recent highs.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

52%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00098 (candle [3] low)

Major support

$0.000154 (candle [2] low)

Immediate resistance

$0.00172 (candle [3] high)

Major resistance

$0.00121 near-term pivot from candle [2] high, though already breached intrahour

With only 3 candles, support/resistance is provisional. Immediate support sits at the candle [3] low of $0.00098; a break below opens room toward the candle [2] low of $0.000154, which represents the deeper structural support from the initial pump phase. Immediate resistance is the candle [3] high of $0.00172; a reclaim/hold above this would be needed to confirm continuation.

Notable patterns

Parabolic pump across all 3 candles with closes making higher highs each hour
Long upper wicks in candles [1]-[3] indicating repeated rejection at highs and profit-taking
Volume divergence: volume declining (candle [2] to [3]) while price attempts to hold gains, a bearish warning sign
Sharp -18.57% 5-minute drop immediately following the up-move, consistent with a blow-off top pattern

Liquidity

$47,694.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of only ~$47.69K is extremely shallow relative to both the $1.15M fully diluted valuation (~24x gap) and the ~$2.1M combined 24h buy+sell volume (~44x pool turnover), implying that any moderately sized trade will cause severe slippage and that the reported 24h price action ($0.0000043 to $0.0017+) is easily explainable by such thin depth. Buy and sell volumes are nearly balanced (51.5% vs 48.5%), and there were more unique buyers (5,139) than sellers (3,704), producing a mild net inflow signal, but this thin liquidity means the pool is highly vulnerable to a single large sell order causing a dramatic price collapse.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,995,091.32 PENIS

FDV

$1.15M

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
24h price change of +2566% with intra-hour ranges spanning multiple orders of magnitude (e.g. $0.0000043 to $0.00033 in one hour) and a -18.6% swing in the most recent 5 minutes represent extreme, near-uncontrolled volatility.
Liquidityhigh
Only ~$47.69K total liquidity against a $1.15M FDV and ~$2.1M in 24h volume means the pool can be easily drained or manipulated, and slippage on modest trade sizes will be significant.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely shallow liquidity (~$47.69K) relative to FDV (~$1.15M), creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Parabolic +2566% 24h price move with clear signs of momentum exhaustion (declining volume, -18.6% 5-minute reversal)
Total absence of holder distribution and sniper/insider data, preventing verification of concentration and dump risk
Unknown mint/freeze authority and contract verification status, leaving rug-pull potential unconfirmed but unaddressed
Meme-coin naming/branding (Peniscoin/PENIS) with no substantive description, consistent with low-effort speculative launches

Mitigating factors

24h buy/sell volume is roughly balanced (51.5%/48.5%) rather than one-sided dumping
More unique buyers (5,139) than sellers (3,704) in the past 24h, suggesting some organic demand
A live Twitter social link exists, indicating at least minimal community/marketing presence

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital; unsuitable for conservative or medium-risk investors given the shallow liquidity, unresolved authority/rug risk, missing holder transparency, and extreme volatility already showing signs of reversal.

Peniscoin (PENIS) is a highly speculative, newly parabolic Solana meme token with critical data gaps (no holder data, no sniper data, unknown contract authorities) layered on top of extremely shallow liquidity (~$47.69K) versus a $1.15M FDV. The recent +2566% 24h move appears to be a classic thin-liquidity meme pump that is already showing signs of exhaustion (declining hourly volume, -18.6% 5-minute reversal). This is a trade for risk capital only, not an investment thesis grounded in fundamentals.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued social momentum and new buyer inflow sustain or extend the rally, with the token gaining broader exchange/aggregator visibility, pulling in fresh liquidity that reduces slippage risk and allows the pump to continue toward or beyond the recent $0.00172 high.

Sustained or growing unique buyer count (currently 5,139 in 24h) outpacing sellers (3,704)
Additional liquidity provisioning that reduces the current ~24x FDV/liquidity gap
Viral social/Twitter-driven attention typical of meme coin cycles
Continuation of the higher-closes pattern seen across the three available candles

Base Case

Price consolidates in a wide, volatile range roughly between the candle [3] low (~$0.00098) and high (~$0.00172) over the near term as buy and sell pressure remain roughly balanced (51.5%/48.5%), with a gradual downward bias as initial pump momentum fades, absent new liquidity or catalysts.

No major new liquidity injection occurs in the short term
Buy/sell volume balance persists near current ~50/50 levels
No confirmed large holder dump occurs (though this cannot be verified from available data)
General meme-coin volatility patterns apply given the token's profile

Bear Case

High probability

The parabolic move exhausts quickly — as already hinted by the -18.6% 5-minute drop and declining hourly volume — and price retraces sharply toward or below the candle [2] low of $0.000154, especially if any concentrated holder or early sniper (unverifiable with current data) sells into the shallow $47.69K pool.

Extremely thin liquidity relative to trading volume and FDV, enabling fast, severe price collapses
Momentum already reversing intraday after an unsustainable +2566% 24h gain
Unknown/unresolved mint and freeze authority status leaving open rug-pull potential
No holder transparency to confirm the absence of concentrated whale positions ready to dump

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 10, 12:16 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-10 00:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain metadata (mint, supply, decimals, FDV)
USD price feed with 24h/1h/5m percentage changes
Hourly OHLC candle data (3 most recent candles) from Raydium CPMM pair AXTq4JHNYHSnooqjoDmtL9WW5eEgnkkMSWq76Kznidnz
Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers, total liquidity)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

No holder data available at all — holder counts, growth trends, and distribution could not be assessed
No sniper/insider wallet data available — early buyer behavior and dump risk could not be quantified
Only 3 hourly OHLC candles provided, insufficient for robust technical trend/support-resistance analysis
Metadata fields for contract verification, update authority, mutability, and master edition are all 'unknown', preventing confirmation of rug-pull safeguards
Token name/symbol/description are creator-supplied and treated strictly as untrusted evidence, not as indicators of legitimacy

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided, which contains significant gaps (no holder data, no sniper data, unknown authority status). Cryptocurrency, and especially low-liquidity meme tokens, carry very high risk of total loss. Conduct your own due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Peniscoin (PENIS) a scam?

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 3% fee and the owner can still raise it. Checked Oct 21, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Peniscoin (PENIS)?

Yes. Every buy and sell pays a 3% transfer fee, and the owner can still raise it. Checked Oct 21, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Peniscoin ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Peniscoin?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Peniscoin liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-10 00:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $47,694.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Peniscoin (PENIS)?

Is PENIS a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital; unsuitable for conservative or medium-risk investors given the shallow liquidity, unresolved authority/rug risk, missing holder transparency, and extreme volatility already showing signs of reversal.

What are the key risks of holding PENIS?

Extremely shallow liquidity (~$47.69K) relative to FDV (~$1.15M), creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Parabolic +2566% 24h price move with clear signs of momentum exhaustion (declining volume, -18.6% 5-minute reversal) • Total absence of holder distribution and sniper/insider data, preventing verification of concentration and dump risk