LABUBU

LABUBU Price Today & AI Analysis

LABUBU
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 11, 2026

JB2wezZLdzWfnaCfHxLg193RS3Rh51ThiXxEDWQDpump

$0.000447

-1.29%

FDV $445,864

LiveContract:JB2wezZLdzWfnaCfHxLg193RS3Rh51ThiXxEDWQDpumpChain:SolanaHolders:17,105Market cap:$445,864

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about LABUBU

Report snapshotas of Jun 11, 07:18 PM
FDV

$987,372

Liquidity

$323,711

Holders

17,965

Snipers

0

Risk

High

AI Executive Summary

LABUBU (LABUBU) is a Solana-based meme/utility token with a circulating supply of ~997.7M tokens, currently priced at ~$0.000990 USD. The token has experienced a sharp 63% price surge in the past 24 hours, driven by elevated buy pressure (61.2%) and a spike in trading volume. The token trades on Raydium with $323.71K in total liquidity. Holder count stands at 17,965 but has been essentially flat-to-declining over the past 30 days, with the recent 24h spike of +112 holders likely a direct response to the price pump. Concentration risk is notable: the top 10 holders control 42.18% of supply, and the top 100 control 75.25%. The token description references an 'ERC20' utility token — a red flag for a Solana token, suggesting copy-pasted or misleading metadata. Update authority is not renounced.

Risk: High
Sentiment: Neutral
Sharp 63% 24h price surge with elevated buy pressure (61.2%)
Large and established holder base of 17,965 wallets
Significant top-holder concentration: top 10 at 42.18%, top 100 at 75.25%
Misleading metadata: description references 'ERC20' on a Solana token
Update authority not renounced; mutable flag is false

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term

neutral
24–72 hours

After a 63% surge, the token is likely to face profit-taking pressure and consolidation. The most recent candle (hour 1) shows a close at $0.000990 after reaching a high of $0.001023, suggesting resistance near $0.00102. Volume has been declining from the peak hour (hour 2: $12.2K) to the most recent hour ($9.3K), indicating momentum may be fading. Short-term direction is neutral-to-bearish as the pump cools.

Target low$0.000610
Target high$0.001090
Support: $0.000675 (hour 3 close), $0.000613 (hour 6 open/close), $0.000590 (hour 10 low)
Resistance: $0.001023 (hour 1 high), $0.001090 (hour 2 high — recent peak)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

The 30-day holder trend has been flat-to-declining (net -29 holders on May 12, net -25 on May 13), with the recent 24h spike of +112 likely pump-driven. Without sustained organic growth in holders or new catalysts, the token is likely to retrace toward pre-pump levels (~$0.000590–$0.000613). The top-heavy holder distribution and unrenounced update authority add medium-term downside risk.

Catalysts
  • Sustained new holder acquisition beyond the pump event
  • Broader Solana meme token market rally
  • Listing on a centralized exchange
  • Renouncement of update authority to reduce rug risk

Bullish factors

  • Strong 24h buy pressure at 61.2% ($18.74K buys vs $11.91K sells)
  • Price up 63% in 24h with 252 buy transactions vs 185 sells
  • 75 unique buyers vs 35 unique sellers in 24h — broad participation
  • Established holder base of 17,965 wallets provides some distribution

Bearish factors

  • Top 10 holders control 42.18% of supply — high dump risk
  • 30-day holder trend was flat-to-declining before the pump
  • Misleading ERC20 description on a Solana token — metadata red flag
  • Update authority not renounced (TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM)
  • Thin liquidity ($323.71K) relative to FDV ($987K) — high slippage risk
  • No sniper data available; early buyer behavior unknown
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the meme token nature, thin liquidity ($323.71K), misleading metadata, and the fact that the 63% pump occurred within a single day with no clear fundamental catalyst. Price action in this segment is highly unpredictable.

LABUBU call history

Full track record →
Jun 11neutral
24h
7d
30d-44.8%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

The 12-hour OHLC series reveals a prolonged base-building phase from candle 12 (~$0.000562) through candle 6 (~$0.000613), followed by a sharp breakout in candles 3–2–1. Candle 12 (Jun 10 21:00): low of $0.000562, close $0.000569 — base. Candles 11–6: tight range $0.000590–$0.000623, very low volume (5–610 USD), indicating accumulation/dormancy. Candle 3 (17:00): breakout begins, open $0.000632, high $0.000699, close $0.000676, volume $4.6K. Candle 2 (18:00): explosive move, open $0.000685, high $0.001090, close $0.000911, volume $12.2K — a large bullish candle with a long upper wick suggesting partial rejection at the high. Candle 1 (19:00): continuation, open $0.000889, high $0.001023, close $0.000990, volume $9.3K — bullish but with a slight upper wick. The pattern is a sharp V-shaped pump from a flat base, with the most recent candle showing a potential deceleration (lower high than candle 2's peak of $0.001090).

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 61%Sell 39%

Short-term trend is strongly bullish following the breakout from a multi-hour flat base. Medium-term trend is sideways, as the 30-day holder data and pre-pump price action suggest the token was in a prolonged consolidation. The sustainability of the short-term uptrend is uncertain given thin volume and liquidity.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000889 (candle 1 open / candle 2 close area)
Major$0.000590 (candle 10 low — pre-pump base)
Resistance
Immediate$0.001023 (candle 1 high)
Major$0.001090 (candle 2 high — session peak)

Immediate support sits at the candle 1 open (~$0.000889), which also approximates the candle 2 close. A break below this level would target the pre-pump consolidation zone of $0.000590–$0.000613. On the upside, $0.001023 (candle 1 high) is the first resistance, with $0.001090 (candle 2 high) as the session peak and major resistance.

Notable patterns

  • Sharp V-shaped pump from flat base — classic low-liquidity pump pattern
  • Candle 2 (18:00): large bullish body with long upper wick — partial rejection at $0.001090
  • Candle 1 (19:00): lower high than candle 2 — potential momentum deceleration
  • Candles 6–11: near-doji cluster with minimal volume — pre-pump accumulation/dormancy phase
  • Volume declining on the second pump candle — bearish divergence signal

Total holders17,965
24h Δ+0.62
7d Δ+0.55
30d Δ+0.04
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The 24h holder growth of +112 (+0.62%) is clearly correlated with the 63% price pump, as the 30-day baseline shows near-zero net growth (only +8 holders over 30 days, or +0.04%). The historical series shows the token lost holders from May 12 (17,928) through mid-May (net -29 on May 12, -25 on May 13, -13 on May 16, -11 on May 18), stabilized in late May, and has been essentially flat in early June before the pump. The 24h spike in holders is pump-driven, not organic.

LABUBU's holder base of 17,965 has been remarkably stable — almost stagnant — over the past 30 days, with a net change of only +8 holders (+0.04%) over the full period. The historical series reveals a mild declining trend from May 12 (17,928) to late May (~17,850s), followed by stabilization in early June. The 24h surge of +112 holders is an outlier driven by the 63% price pump and is unlikely to represent sustained organic growth. Growth is technically 'accelerating' in the 24h window but this is pump-correlated, not a fundamental trend shift. The 7d growth of +99 (+0.55%) is also slightly elevated, possibly reflecting early momentum from the pump beginning. Distribution breakdown: 140 whales, 80 sharks, 667 dolphins, 1,090 fish, 1,517 octopus — a relatively broad base but dominated by smaller holders.

Top 10 hold42.18%
Top 100 hold75.25%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

5Q544fKrFoe6tsEbD7S8EmxGTJYAKtTVhAW5Q5pge4j1

DEX liquidity pool or centralized exchange — holds 18.50% (184.6M tokens); this address pattern is consistent with a Raydium liquidity pool or major exchange hot wallet. Largest single holder by a wide margin.

18.50%

28RWPC6XPxSxUVjd27KiNRtcHVxKtd6cjms7eBcxiqdV

Individual whale or project treasury — holds 12.18% (121.6M tokens). Second largest holder with no obvious DEX/CEX pattern. High concentration risk.

12.18%

u6PJ8DtQuPFnfmwHbGFULQ4u4EgjDiyYKjVEsynXq2w

Individual whale — holds 2.78% (27.8M tokens). Significant but not dominant position.

2.78%

5hbeQuer2yRSjXi4d2xAS4JucSjAnDzPP74k6A7gwBs

Individual whale — holds 1.49% (14.8M tokens).

1.49%

ExmEsZKWbheF5o9yNnzF3XVrLsfEt66kQQdxCPJpBTPz

Individual whale — holds 1.36% (13.5M tokens).

1.36%

The top 10 holders control 42.18% of supply and the top 100 control 75.25%, indicating a concentrated distribution. The #1 holder at 18.50% (184.6M tokens) is likely a DEX liquidity pool (possibly the Raydium pair FYAnFcdjkcfAkbtZqixnTqNVLoDjJft82L5FFgPaSWe3), which would be a positive sign for liquidity. However, the #2 holder at 12.18% (121.6M tokens) is an unclassified large wallet that represents significant concentration risk — if this is a team or early investor wallet, a sell event could be devastating. Holders 3–10 each hold 1.0–2.78%, adding further concentration. The remaining 57.82% is distributed among ~17,955 smaller holders. Sentiment is mixed: the liquidity pool holding is constructive, but the unidentified 12.18% whale is a major overhang risk.

Liquidity$323,710
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$18,740
Sell$11,910
Net flow
inflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers75
Unique sellers35

Total liquidity of $323.71K against an FDV of $987.37K gives a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of approximately 32.8%, which is relatively healthy for a micro-cap meme token but still shallow in absolute terms. The 24h net inflow is positive ($18.74K buys vs $11.91K sells, 61.2% buy pressure), with 75 unique buyers vs 35 unique sellers — a 2:1 buyer-to-seller ratio. However, the absolute volume ($30.65K total 24h) is thin relative to the liquidity pool, and large trades would face significant slippage. The token trades on Raydium (pair: FYAnFcdjkcfAkbtZqixnTqNVLoDjJft82L5FFgPaSWe3). Slippage risk is rated high because even modest sell orders from top holders could move the price significantly given the shallow pool depth. The 63% price move on relatively low volume ($30.65K 24h) confirms the thin liquidity environment.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply997,706,778.65 LABUBU
FDV$987,372.46

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token has a total supply of ~997.7M LABUBU with an FDV of ~$987K at current prices. The update authority is held by TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM — this is NOT a burn address (not 11111...) and is NOT renounced, meaning the metadata can potentially be modified. However, the 'Mutable' flag is set to false, which limits the practical risk of metadata changes. Mint authority and freeze authority status are not explicitly provided in the data and cannot be confirmed — rated 'unknown'. The token description contains a significant red flag: it describes an 'ERC20 token' on what is clearly a Solana SPL token (Pump.fun mint address ending in 'pump'). This copy-pasted or fabricated description suggests either negligence or intentional deception by the creator. The token appears to have been launched via Pump.fun (mint address suffix 'pump'), which typically involves a bonding curve mechanism. No verified contract status. Overall tokenomics authority risk is rated medium due to the unrenounced update authority and misleading metadata.

Volatility
high

63% price surge in 24 hours on thin volume ($30.65K) demonstrates extreme volatility. The token can move dramatically on small order flow due to shallow liquidity.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of $323.71K is shallow. Large holders (top 2 control 30.68% of supply) could cause severe price impact if they sell. Slippage risk is high for any meaningful position size.

Concentration
high

Top 10 holders control 42.18% of supply; top 100 control 75.25%. The #2 holder alone holds 12.18% (121.6M tokens) — an unidentified wallet that represents a major overhang risk.

SniperDump
medium

No sniper data is available, so early buyer behavior cannot be assessed. The token has been live long enough (30+ days of holder history) that early snipers may have already exited or are sitting on significant unrealized gains following the 63% pump.

Authority
medium

Update authority (TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM) is not renounced. Mint and freeze authority status are unknown. The 'Mutable: false' flag provides some protection. The misleading ERC20 description in metadata is a significant red flag suggesting creator negligence or deception.

Key risks

  • Top 2 holders control 30.68% of supply — coordinated or individual dump could be catastrophic
  • Misleading ERC20 description on a Solana token — metadata integrity concern
  • Update authority not renounced — potential for metadata manipulation
  • 30-day holder trend was flat-to-declining before the pump — no organic growth
  • Thin liquidity ($323.71K) creates high slippage and price manipulation risk
  • No sniper data — early buyer behavior and profit-taking risk unknown
  • Pump.fun origin — many such tokens experience rapid price decay post-launch

Mitigating factors

  • Established holder base of 17,965 wallets provides some distribution
  • Mutable flag is false — limits metadata change risk
  • 61.2% buy pressure in 24h with 2:1 buyer-to-seller ratio
  • Liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~32.8% is reasonable for micro-cap
  • Token has survived 30+ days without apparent rug — some longevity signal
Suitable for: Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who can afford to lose their entire investment. Not suitable for conservative or moderate-risk investors. Any position should be sized as a very small percentage of a portfolio. The 63% pump makes current entry particularly risky — late entries in pump-and-dump scenarios typically face the steepest losses.

LABUBU is a Solana meme token that has experienced a sharp 63% pump in 24 hours from a prolonged flat base. The token has an established but stagnant holder base of ~17,965 wallets, thin liquidity, and significant concentration risk. The misleading ERC20 description and unrenounced update authority are red flags. The investment case is purely speculative momentum-based, with significant downside risk from whale selling and post-pump retracement.

Bull case (low)

Momentum continuation: The 63% pump attracts broader attention, new buyers continue to enter, and the token breaks above $0.001090 (session high) with sustained volume. Whale holders continue to hold, and the token develops a community narrative around the LABUBU brand (popular toy/collectible IP).

  • Sustained buy pressure above 60% for multiple days
  • New holder acquisition accelerating beyond pump-driven levels
  • Broader Solana meme token market rally
  • Social media virality around the LABUBU brand
  • Top holders maintaining positions and not selling

Base case

Partial retracement and consolidation: The token gives back 30–50% of the pump gains, settling in the $0.000650–$0.000800 range, and then enters another period of sideways trading. Some new holders from the pump remain, but organic growth stays minimal.

  • Top holders take partial profits but do not fully exit
  • Buy pressure normalizes to 50–55% range
  • Holder count stabilizes around 17,900–18,000
  • No major new catalyst emerges in the next 7–14 days
  • Liquidity pool remains intact

Bear case (high)

Post-pump dump: Large holders (particularly the 12.18% whale) take profits following the 63% surge. Volume dries up, new buyers disappear, and the token retraces to pre-pump levels (~$0.000590–$0.000613) or lower. The misleading metadata and lack of real utility accelerate the decline.

  • Profit-taking by top holders who have been holding through a flat period
  • Volume declining on subsequent candles (already visible in hour 1 vs hour 2)
  • No fundamental catalyst for the pump — likely to be unsustained
  • 30-day holder stagnation resumes post-pump
  • Thin liquidity amplifies downside moves

GeneratedJun 11, 07:18 PM
Data freshnessPrice and OHLC data current as of 2026-06-11T19:00:00Z (most recent candle). Holder data current as of 2026-06-10T00:00:00Z for historical series; real-time holder count 17,965. Trading analytics reflect 24h window ending at analysis time.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Moralis on-chain token metadata API
  • Raydium DEX OHLC price data (hourly candles)
  • On-chain holder distribution and historical holder metrics
  • Trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • Top 20 holder addresses and balances
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • No sniper/early buyer data available — early holder behavior cannot be assessed
  • Mint authority and freeze authority status not explicitly provided — rated unknown
  • Top holder classifications are inferred from address patterns, not verified on-chain labels
  • The #1 holder (18.50%) cannot be definitively classified as a liquidity pool without additional verification
  • 30-day historical holder series ends June 10 — most recent day not included
  • No social sentiment data, Twitter/Telegram activity, or developer activity metrics available
  • FDV assumes full circulating supply; actual float may differ if tokens are locked
  • Pump.fun bonding curve mechanics may affect price dynamics in ways not captured by standard OHLC analysis

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed comes from on-chain sources and may contain errors or manipulation by token creators. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. The misleading ERC20 description in this token's metadata is a specific red flag that prospective investors should investigate further.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply997,706,778.65 LABUBU

Key Risks

Top 2 holders control 30.68% of supply — coordinated or individual dump could be catastrophic
Misleading ERC20 description on a Solana token — metadata integrity concern
Update authority not renounced — potential for metadata manipulation
30-day holder trend was flat-to-declining before the pump — no organic growth

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for LABUBU. Early buyer behavior, sniper PnL state, and sell-through rates cannot be assessed. The absence of sniper data limits smart money signal analysis significantly. What can be observed from on-chain holder data is that 15,236 holders acquired via swap, 2,111 via transfer, and 618 via airdrop, suggesting the majority of holders are active market participants rather than airdrop recipients.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available — the sniper analysis endpoint returned no data for this token.

Unknown — no sniper data available. The 30-day holder trend shows the token had ~17,900 holders as far back as May 12, suggesting early buyers have been holding for an extended period through a flat price environment. The 63% pump may incentivize profit-taking among long-term holders.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for LABUBU (LABUBU)?

After a 63% surge, the token is likely to face profit-taking pressure and consolidation. The most recent candle (hour 1) shows a close at $0.000990 after reaching a high of $0.001023, suggesting resistance near $0.00102. Volume has been declining from the peak hour (hour 2: $12.2K) to the most recent hour ($9.3K), indicating momentum may be fading. Short-term direction is neutral-to-bearish as the pump cools. Short-term outlook is neutral (24–72 hours), with a target range of $0.000610 to $0.001090.

Is LABUBU a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated high with a risk score of 7.8/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who can afford to lose their entire investment. Not suitable for conservative or moderate-risk investors. Any position should be sized as a very small percentage of a portfolio. The 63% pump makes current entry particularly risky — late entries in pump-and-dump scenarios typically face the steepest losses.

How are LABUBU holders trending?

LABUBU currently has 17,965 holders and is stable (24h: 0.62, 7d: 0.55, 30d: 0.04). LABUBU's holder base of 17,965 has been remarkably stable — almost stagnant — over the past 30 days, with a net change of only +8 holders (+0.04%) over the full period. The historical series reveals a mild declining trend from May 12 (17,928) to late May (~17,850s), followed by stabilization in early June. The 24h surge of +112 holders is an outlier driven by the 63% price pump and is unlikely to represent sustained organic growth. Growth is technically 'accelerating' in the 24h window but this is pump-correlated, not a fundamental trend shift. The 7d growth of +99 (+0.55%) is also slightly elevated, possibly reflecting early momentum from the pump beginning. Distribution breakdown: 140 whales, 80 sharks, 667 dolphins, 1,090 fish, 1,517 octopus — a relatively broad base but dominated by smaller holders.

What does sniper activity look like for LABUBU?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding LABUBU?

Top 2 holders control 30.68% of supply — coordinated or individual dump could be catastrophic • Misleading ERC20 description on a Solana token — metadata integrity concern • Update authority not renounced — potential for metadata manipulation

Track LABUBU