LABUBU Price Today & AI Analysis

LABUBUSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 11, 2026

$0.000358

-0.23% 24h

Contract

Live

JB2wezZLdzWfnaCfHxLg193RS3Rh51ThiXxEDWQDpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

16,927

Market cap

$357,249

At a $1M market cap, $LABUBU would be $0.001002 (2.80x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is LABUBU a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 25

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about LABUBU

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

BearThe Black Bear$0.0₅4333+1.4%MC $4.2K

DIRECTORTruman Show$0.0₄3286+0.3%MC $32.9K

RévolteLa Révolte$0.0₅3523+20.2%MC $3.4K

DEXBULLThe Dextools Bull$0.0₄1490-9.9%MC $9.7K

HENRYJustice For Henry Nowak$0.0₄1760-6.8%MC $17.6K

BIRBMoonbirds$0.0765-47.7%MC $21.80M

LABUBU: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-11 19:18 UTC

Holder addresses

17,965

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$323,710.71

How concentrated is LABUBU ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 17,965 addresses (2026-06-11 19:18 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling LABUBU?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is LABUBU liquidity falling?: As of 2026-06-11 19:18 UTC, reported liquidity was $323,710.71. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-11 19:18 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jun 11, 07:18 PM UTC

FDV

$987,372

Liquidity

$323,710.71

Holders

17,965

Snipers

Not available

Risk

High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

High

Sentiment

Neutral

LABUBU (LABUBU) is a Solana-based meme/utility token with a circulating supply of ~997.7M tokens, currently priced at ~$0.000990 USD. The token has experienced a sharp 63% price surge in the past 24 hours, driven by elevated buy pressure (61.2%) and a spike in trading volume. The token trades on Raydium with $323.71K in total liquidity. Holder count stands at 17,965 but has been essentially flat-to-declining over the past 30 days, with the recent 24h spike of +112 holders likely a direct response to the price pump. Concentration risk is notable: the top 10 holders control 42.18% of supply, and the top 100 control 75.25%. The token description references an 'ERC20' utility token — a red flag for a Solana token, suggesting copy-pasted or misleading metadata. Update authority is not renounced.

Key points

Sharp 63% 24h price surge with elevated buy pressure (61.2%)
Large and established holder base of 17,965 wallets
Significant top-holder concentration: top 10 at 42.18%, top 100 at 75.25%
Misleading metadata: description references 'ERC20' on a Solana token
Update authority not renounced; mutable flag is false

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24–72 hours

neutral

After a 63% surge, the token is likely to face profit-taking pressure and consolidation. The most recent candle (hour 1) shows a close at $0.000990 after reaching a high of $0.001023, suggesting resistance near $0.00102. Volume has been declining from the peak hour (hour 2: $12.2K) to the most recent hour ($9.3K), indicating momentum may be fading. Short-term direction is neutral-to-bearish as the pump cools.

Target low

$0.000610

Target high

$0.001090

Support: $0.000675 (hour 3 close), $0.000613 (hour 6 open/close), $0.000590 (hour 10 low)
Resistance: $0.001023 (hour 1 high), $0.001090 (hour 2 high — recent peak)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

The 30-day holder trend has been flat-to-declining (net -29 holders on May 12, net -25 on May 13), with the recent 24h spike of +112 likely pump-driven. Without sustained organic growth in holders or new catalysts, the token is likely to retrace toward pre-pump levels (~$0.000590–$0.000613). The top-heavy holder distribution and unrenounced update authority add medium-term downside risk.

Catalysts

Sustained new holder acquisition beyond the pump event
Broader Solana meme token market rally
Listing on a centralized exchange
Renouncement of update authority to reduce rug risk

Bullish factors

Strong 24h buy pressure at 61.2% ($18.74K buys vs $11.91K sells)
Price up 63% in 24h with 252 buy transactions vs 185 sells
75 unique buyers vs 35 unique sellers in 24h — broad participation
Established holder base of 17,965 wallets provides some distribution

Bearish factors

Top 10 holders control 42.18% of supply — high dump risk
30-day holder trend was flat-to-declining before the pump
Misleading ERC20 description on a Solana token — metadata red flag
Update authority not renounced (TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM)
Thin liquidity ($323.71K) relative to FDV ($987K) — high slippage risk
No sniper data available; early buyer behavior unknown

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the meme token nature, thin liquidity ($323.71K), misleading metadata, and the fact that the 63% pump occurred within a single day with no clear fundamental catalyst. Price action in this segment is highly unpredictable.

LABUBU call history

Full track record →

Jun 11neutral@ $0.000990

24h—

7d—

30d-44.8%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: JB2wez...pump
Total Supply: 997,706,778.65 LABUBU

Key Risks

Top 2 holders control 30.68% of supply — coordinated or individual dump could be catastrophic
Misleading ERC20 description on a Solana token — metadata integrity concern
Update authority not renounced — potential for metadata manipulation
30-day holder trend was flat-to-declining before the pump — no organic growth

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 12-hour OHLC series reveals a prolonged base-building phase from candle 12 (~$0.000562) through candle 6 (~$0.000613), followed by a sharp breakout in candles 3–2–1. Candle 12 (Jun 10 21:00): low of $0.000562, close $0.000569 — base. Candles 11–6: tight range $0.000590–$0.000623, very low volume (5–610 USD), indicating accumulation/dormancy. Candle 3 (17:00): breakout begins, open $0.000632, high $0.000699, close $0.000676, volume $4.6K. Candle 2 (18:00): explosive move, open $0.000685, high $0.001090, close $0.000911, volume $12.2K — a large bullish candle with a long upper wick suggesting partial rejection at the high. Candle 1 (19:00): continuation, open $0.000889, high $0.001023, close $0.000990, volume $9.3K — bullish but with a slight upper wick. The pattern is a sharp V-shaped pump from a flat base, with the most recent candle showing a potential deceleration (lower high than candle 2's peak of $0.001090).

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is strongly bullish following the breakout from a multi-hour flat base. Medium-term trend is sideways, as the 30-day holder data and pre-pump price action suggest the token was in a prolonged consolidation. The sustainability of the short-term uptrend is uncertain given thin volume and liquidity.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

61%

Sell

39%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000889 (candle 1 open / candle 2 close area)

Major support

$0.000590 (candle 10 low — pre-pump base)

Immediate resistance

$0.001023 (candle 1 high)

Major resistance

$0.001090 (candle 2 high — session peak)

Immediate support sits at the candle 1 open (~$0.000889), which also approximates the candle 2 close. A break below this level would target the pre-pump consolidation zone of $0.000590–$0.000613. On the upside, $0.001023 (candle 1 high) is the first resistance, with $0.001090 (candle 2 high) as the session peak and major resistance.

Notable patterns

Sharp V-shaped pump from flat base — classic low-liquidity pump pattern
Candle 2 (18:00): large bullish body with long upper wick — partial rejection at $0.001090
Candle 1 (19:00): lower high than candle 2 — potential momentum deceleration
Candles 6–11: near-doji cluster with minimal volume — pre-pump accumulation/dormancy phase
Volume declining on the second pump candle — bearish divergence signal

Liquidity

$323,710.71

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of $323.71K against an FDV of $987.37K gives a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of approximately 32.8%, which is relatively healthy for a micro-cap meme token but still shallow in absolute terms. The 24h net inflow is positive ($18.74K buys vs $11.91K sells, 61.2% buy pressure), with 75 unique buyers vs 35 unique sellers — a 2:1 buyer-to-seller ratio. However, the absolute volume ($30.65K total 24h) is thin relative to the liquidity pool, and large trades would face significant slippage. The token trades on Raydium (pair: FYAnFcdjkcfAkbtZqixnTqNVLoDjJft82L5FFgPaSWe3). Slippage risk is rated high because even modest sell orders from top holders could move the price significantly given the shallow pool depth. The 63% price move on relatively low volume ($30.65K 24h) confirms the thin liquidity environment.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

997,706,778.65 LABUBU

FDV

$987,372.46

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
63% price surge in 24 hours on thin volume ($30.65K) demonstrates extreme volatility. The token can move dramatically on small order flow due to shallow liquidity.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of $323.71K is shallow. Large holders (top 2 control 30.68% of supply) could cause severe price impact if they sell. Slippage risk is high for any meaningful position size.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Top 2 holders control 30.68% of supply — coordinated or individual dump could be catastrophic
Misleading ERC20 description on a Solana token — metadata integrity concern
Update authority not renounced — potential for metadata manipulation
30-day holder trend was flat-to-declining before the pump — no organic growth
Thin liquidity ($323.71K) creates high slippage and price manipulation risk
No sniper data — early buyer behavior and profit-taking risk unknown
Pump.fun origin — many such tokens experience rapid price decay post-launch

Mitigating factors

Established holder base of 17,965 wallets provides some distribution
Mutable flag is false — limits metadata change risk
61.2% buy pressure in 24h with 2:1 buyer-to-seller ratio
Liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~32.8% is reasonable for micro-cap
Token has survived 30+ days without apparent rug — some longevity signal

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who can afford to lose their entire investment. Not suitable for conservative or moderate-risk investors. Any position should be sized as a very small percentage of a portfolio. The 63% pump makes current entry particularly risky — late entries in pump-and-dump scenarios typically face the steepest losses.

LABUBU is a Solana meme token that has experienced a sharp 63% pump in 24 hours from a prolonged flat base. The token has an established but stagnant holder base of ~17,965 wallets, thin liquidity, and significant concentration risk. The misleading ERC20 description and unrenounced update authority are red flags. The investment case is purely speculative momentum-based, with significant downside risk from whale selling and post-pump retracement.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Momentum continuation: The 63% pump attracts broader attention, new buyers continue to enter, and the token breaks above $0.001090 (session high) with sustained volume. Whale holders continue to hold, and the token develops a community narrative around the LABUBU brand (popular toy/collectible IP).

Sustained buy pressure above 60% for multiple days
New holder acquisition accelerating beyond pump-driven levels
Broader Solana meme token market rally
Social media virality around the LABUBU brand
Top holders maintaining positions and not selling

Base Case

Partial retracement and consolidation: The token gives back 30–50% of the pump gains, settling in the $0.000650–$0.000800 range, and then enters another period of sideways trading. Some new holders from the pump remain, but organic growth stays minimal.

Top holders take partial profits but do not fully exit
Buy pressure normalizes to 50–55% range
Holder count stabilizes around 17,900–18,000
No major new catalyst emerges in the next 7–14 days
Liquidity pool remains intact

Bear Case

High probability

Post-pump dump: Large holders (particularly the 12.18% whale) take profits following the 63% surge. Volume dries up, new buyers disappear, and the token retraces to pre-pump levels (~$0.000590–$0.000613) or lower. The misleading metadata and lack of real utility accelerate the decline.

Profit-taking by top holders who have been holding through a flat period
Volume declining on subsequent candles (already visible in hour 1 vs hour 2)
No fundamental catalyst for the pump — likely to be unsustained
30-day holder stagnation resumes post-pump
Thin liquidity amplifies downside moves

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 11, 07:18 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-11 19:18 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

Moralis on-chain token metadata API
Raydium DEX OHLC price data (hourly candles)
On-chain holder distribution and historical holder metrics
Trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
Top 20 holder addresses and balances
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

No sniper/early buyer data available — early holder behavior cannot be assessed
Mint authority and freeze authority status not explicitly provided — rated unknown
Top holder classifications are inferred from address patterns, not verified on-chain labels
The #1 holder (18.50%) cannot be definitively classified as a liquidity pool without additional verification
30-day historical holder series ends June 10 — most recent day not included
No social sentiment data, Twitter/Telegram activity, or developer activity metrics available
FDV assumes full circulating supply; actual float may differ if tokens are locked
Pump.fun bonding curve mechanics may affect price dynamics in ways not captured by standard OHLC analysis

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed comes from on-chain sources and may contain errors or manipulation by token creators. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. The misleading ERC20 description in this token's metadata is a specific red flag that prospective investors should investigate further.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is LABUBU a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 25, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell LABUBU?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 25, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is LABUBU ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 17,965 addresses (2026-06-11 19:18 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling LABUBU?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is LABUBU liquidity falling?

As of 2026-06-11 19:18 UTC, reported liquidity was $323,710.71. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for LABUBU (LABUBU)?

Is LABUBU a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as high with a risk score of 7.8/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who can afford to lose their entire investment. Not suitable for conservative or moderate-risk investors. Any position should be sized as a very small percentage of a portfolio. The 63% pump makes current entry particularly risky — late entries in pump-and-dump scenarios typically face the steepest losses.

What are the key risks of holding LABUBU?

Top 2 holders control 30.68% of supply — coordinated or individual dump could be catastrophic • Misleading ERC20 description on a Solana token — metadata integrity concern • Update authority not renounced — potential for metadata manipulation