up

number go up Price Today & AI Analysis

upSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 24, 2026

Price

$0.049128

+49.66% 24h · FDV $89,470

Contract

Live
J8xTWu6rqCbxpnGjX6GuzSCJ1Su9hPxi5wiGisjtP22K

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,366

Market cap

$89,470

More tokens on Solana

GAYMFGAYMFGalway Metals Inc.$0.000167+256.8%MC $167.1KHYPERCATHYPERCATHYPERCAT$0.001668+3147.4%MC $1.67M$WIF$WIFdogwifhat$0.2354-7.8%MC $235.11MHACKAHACKAHackalaunch$0.041627-14.1%MC $15.3KSATOSHINUSATOSHINUSATOSHINU$0.000505-48.5%MC $494.7KRAYRAYRaydium$1.99+8.6%MC $1.10B

number go up: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-24 03:16 UTC

Holder addresses

1,366

Top 10 supply share

19.37%

Reported liquidity

$16,116.00
How concentrated is number go up ownership?
As of 2026-09-24 03:16 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 19.37% of supply. It reports 1,366 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling number go up?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-24 03:16 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $672,703.00 in buys and $669,793.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is number go up liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +4.92%, from $15,366.00 (2026-09-24 01:00 UTC) to $16,121.40 (2026-09-24 03:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-24 03:16 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-24 01:00 UTC$15,366.00
2026-09-24 02:00 UTC$20,609.94
2026-09-24 03:00 UTC$16,121.40

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about up

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 24, 03:17 AM UTC

FDV

$89,470

Liquidity

$16,116.00

Holders

1,366

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

'number go up' (UP) is a micro-cap PumpSwap token with $89.47K FDV and only $16.12K total liquidity. The last 3 hourly candles show extreme volatility (a single hour spiking from ~$0.0000047 to $0.00043 then collapsing), and the token is down 55.6% in the last hour and 17.97% in the last 5 minutes despite being up 49.66% over 24h. This is characteristic of a freshly launched, thinly-traded meme token with no verifiable authority status and no historical holder trend data.

Key points

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($16.12K) relative to $89.47K FDV, meaning large price swings on modest trade sizes
  • Recent price action shows a violent pump-and-dump pattern within a single hourly candle (low $0.0000047 to high $0.00043 to close $0.0000817)
  • No sniper data, no authority (mint/freeze) verification, and no holder history available — significant data gaps
  • Top 10 holders control 19.37% of supply across 1,366 holder addresses, a snapshot-only figure with no trend context

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · next 1-6 hours

bearish

Momentum is sharply negative in the immediate term: price is down 55.6% in the last 1h and 17.97% in the last 5m after a massive spike-and-collapse candle. Given the shallow liquidity ($16.12K) and near 50/50 buy/sell pressure (50.1%/49.9%), further mean-reversion downside or continued high volatility is likely before any stabilization.

Target low

$0.000040

Target high

$0.00012

Support

$0.0000470 (candle 1 low/open), $0.0000676 (candle 2 low)

Resistance

$0.000159 (candle 3 high), $0.000350 (candle 1 high), $0.000435 (candle 2 high, all-time spike)

Medium term · 3-7 days

neutral

With only 3 hourly candles of data and no longer-term OHLC, medium-term direction cannot be reliably projected. The token's survival depends on whether liquidity deepens and organic buy interest sustains beyond the initial pump; current shallow liquidity and lack of authority/security verification make a sustained uptrend uncertain.

Catalysts

  • Potential liquidity additions on PumpSwap
  • Continued social/community attention (only a website link provided, no verified socials)
  • Risk of liquidity withdrawal or rug given unknown mint/freeze authority status

Confidence: low. Only 3 hourly candles and no sniper, holder-history, or authority data are available. The token shows classic new-pump volatility, making any prediction highly speculative. Data gaps (unknown authorities, no historical holder trend, no sniper coverage) further reduce confidence.

up call history

Full track record →

Sep 24bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
J8xTWu...P22K
Total Supply
980,136,311.28 UP

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($16.12K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Violent intra-hour price swings (9,000%+ range) followed by a 55.6% one-hour decline, consistent with pump-and-dump dynamics
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply dilution or account freezing
  • No sniper data available to assess early-buyer dumping risk despite clear pump-then-fade price pattern

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly USD candles are available. Candle 1 opened at $0.0000047, spiked intra-candle to a high of $0.000350, and closed at $0.0000817 — a massive wick indicating a violent pump followed by partial retracement, on volume of $807.6K. Candle 2 opened at $0.0000817, pushed to a new high of $0.000435 (the highest print in the dataset), then closed at $0.000149, again showing a large upper wick and pullback, on $656.4K volume. Candle 3 opened at $0.000149, traded in a much tighter range (high $0.000159, low $0.0000721), and closed at $0.0000913, with volume collapsing to $33.9K — suggesting fading momentum and drying up of trading interest after the initial two-candle spike.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term price action is clearly rolling over from the candle 2 peak ($0.000435) down through candle 3's close ($0.0000913), a decline of roughly 79% from peak to latest close. With only 3 data points, medium-term trend cannot be firmly established, but the pattern resembles a classic post-launch pump fading toward equilibrium.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000721 (candle 3 low)

Major support

$0.00000470 (candle 1 open/low, the launch price floor)

Immediate resistance

$0.000159 (candle 3 high)

Major resistance

$0.000435 (candle 2 high, dataset peak)

Price is currently sandwiched between the candle 3 low ($0.0000721) and high ($0.000159), well below the dataset peak of $0.000435 set in candle 2. A reclaim above $0.000159 would signal renewed buying interest, while a break below $0.0000721 risks retesting the $0.0000047-$0.0000676 launch-era zone.

Notable patterns

  • Long upper-wick candles in candles 1 and 2, indicating strong rejection of higher prices (seller absorption after spikes)
  • Sharp volume decay across the 3 candles (~95% decline), suggesting the initial pump was unsustained
  • Rapid parabolic-then-collapse pattern typical of low-liquidity pump-and-dump behavior on new PumpSwap listings

Liquidity

Liquidity

$16,116.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $16.12K against a $89.47K FDV and enormous 24h volume (~$1.34M combined buy+sell) implies volume-to-liquidity ratio of over 80x, indicating that liquidity is being churned repeatedly and any single moderately-sized trade could cause significant slippage or price impact. Buy and sell volumes are nearly balanced (50.1% vs 49.9%), and buyer/seller counts (4,351 vs 3,626) show more unique buyers than sellers, but this balance did not prevent the sharp intra-hour price collapse seen in the candle data, underscoring the fragility of shallow-liquidity pools.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

980,136,311.28 UP

FDV

$89.47K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price moved from a low of $0.0000047 to a high of $0.000435 (over 9,000% range) within 2 hours, then fell 55.6% in the most recent 1h and 17.97% in the last 5 minutes. This extreme volatility is directly evidenced in the OHLC data.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $16.12K against $89.47K FDV and ~$1.34M combined 24h volume, meaning the pool is thin relative to trading activity, creating high slippage risk and vulnerability to large price swings from modest-sized trades.

  • Concentrationmedium

    Top 10 holders control 19.37% of supply across 1,366 holder addresses (current snapshot only). This is a moderate concentration level, but with no historical trend or top-100 data, the true concentration picture and whether it is worsening cannot be confirmed.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($16.12K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Violent intra-hour price swings (9,000%+ range) followed by a 55.6% one-hour decline, consistent with pump-and-dump dynamics
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply dilution or account freezing
  • No sniper data available to assess early-buyer dumping risk despite clear pump-then-fade price pattern
  • No historical holder data to confirm whether holder base is growing organically or is a snapshot of early speculative wallets

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy/sell volume is nearly balanced (50.1%/49.9%), and unique buyers (4,351) modestly exceed unique sellers (3,626), showing some distributed retail participation rather than one-sided dumping
  • Top-10 holder concentration of 19.37% is moderate rather than extreme for a token of this size, though this cannot be confirmed as a durable positive without trend data

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital. This token exhibits classic characteristics of an extremely early-stage, high-volatility, low-liquidity meme token on PumpSwap with significant unresolved due-diligence gaps (authorities, sniper activity, holder history). Not suitable for risk-averse investors or those seeking capital preservation.

'number go up' is a nascent, highly volatile PumpSwap meme token with $89.47K FDV and only $16.12K liquidity. The available data shows a violent pump (up to $0.000435) followed by a sharp fade (-55.6% in 1h), nearly balanced 24h buy/sell flow, and critical unknowns around mint/freeze authorities, sniper activity, and holder history. This combination makes it a highly speculative, short-term trading vehicle rather than a fundamentally analyzable investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If liquidity deepens and buy pressure re-accumulates above the $0.000159 immediate resistance, the token could stage a recovery attempt toward the $0.000350-$0.000435 zone seen in the initial spike, especially if unique buyer counts (currently 4,351 vs 3,626 sellers) continue to outpace sellers.

  • Sustained buyer count advantage (4,351 buyers vs 3,626 sellers in 24h)
  • Renewed social attention or liquidity injection on PumpSwap
  • Reclaiming and holding above $0.000159 resistance

Base Case

The token likely continues to exhibit high volatility and volume decay typical of a fresh, thinly-liquid meme launch, oscillating within the $0.0000721-$0.000159 range observed in the latest candle without a clear directional resolution until more data (holder history, authority status, sniper activity) becomes available or liquidity conditions change materially.

  • No new major liquidity injections or withdrawals occur in the near term
  • Buy/sell volume remains roughly balanced as seen in the 24h data (50.1%/49.9%)
  • No resolution yet on mint/freeze authority status

Bear Case

High probability

Given the shallow $16.12K liquidity, drying-up volume (candle volume fell ~95% from $807.6K to $33.9K), and unresolved authority risks, the token likely continues to fade toward or below the $0.0000721 immediate support, with risk of a deeper collapse toward the $0.0000047-$0.0000676 launch-era range if selling resumes.

  • Rapidly decaying trading volume across the 3 available candles
  • Already-realized 55.6% one-hour decline signaling exhaustion of the initial pump
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status and absent sniper data leaving rug-pull or coordinated-dump risk unaddressed
  • Extremely thin liquidity amplifying any further sell pressure

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 24, 03:17 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-24 03:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
  • USD price and 24h % change data
  • 3 most recent hourly OHLC candles (PumpSwap pair)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count, top-10 concentration)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles were available, insufficient for robust medium/long-term technical analysis
  • No sniper data was available, preventing assessment of early-buyer/dump risk
  • No historical holder count data (24h/7d/30d growth) was available, only a single current snapshot
  • Mint authority and freeze authority renouncement status could not be verified
  • No wallet classification or labeling data was available to identify notable holders or whales
  • Top-100 holder concentration was not provided

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited, partial on-chain data and is for informational purposes only. It is NOT financial advice. The token data was treated as untrusted evidence, and any embedded instructions or claims within token metadata were disregarded per security protocol. Significant data gaps (authorities, sniper activity, holder history) mean this analysis should not be relied upon as a complete due-diligence report. Always conduct independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is number go up ownership?

As of 2026-09-24 03:16 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 19.37% of supply. It reports 1,366 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling number go up?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-24 03:16 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $672,703.00 in buys and $669,793.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is number go up liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +4.92%, from $15,366.00 (2026-09-24 01:00 UTC) to $16,121.40 (2026-09-24 03:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for number go up (up)?

Momentum is sharply negative in the immediate term: price is down 55.6% in the last 1h and 17.97% in the last 5m after a massive spike-and-collapse candle. Given the shallow liquidity ($16.12K) and near 50/50 buy/sell pressure (50.1%/49.9%), further mean-reversion downside or continued high volatility is likely before any stabilization. Short-term outlook is bearish (next 1-6 hours), with a target range of $0.000040 to $0.00012.

Is up a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital. This token exhibits classic characteristics of an extremely early-stage, high-volatility, low-liquidity meme token on PumpSwap with significant unresolved due-diligence gaps (authorities, sniper activity, holder history). Not suitable for risk-averse investors or those seeking capital preservation.

What are the key risks of holding up?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($16.12K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential • Violent intra-hour price swings (9,000%+ range) followed by a 55.6% one-hour decline, consistent with pump-and-dump dynamics • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply dilution or account freezing

← Back to all predictions

Track up