dogwifhat Price Today & AI Analysis

$WIFSolanaAnalysis as of May 1, 2026

$0.1793

+0.89% 24h

Contract

Live

EKpQGSJtjMFqKZ9KQanSqYXRcF8fBopzLHYxdM65zcjm

Chain

Solana

Holders

264,820

Market cap

$179,065,663

At a $500M market cap, $$WIF would be $0.5006 (2.79x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is $WIF a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 24

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about $WIF

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

MaccaMacca The Gator$0.001210-19.1%MC $1.15M

TSLATesla - Backpack Securities$407.86+3.7%MC $660.8K

GMEXGameStop xStock$23.73-4.0%MC $17.08M

ChadaChada$0.0₄8268+527.2%MC $80.0K

ALCHAlchemist AI$0.0386+1.4%MC $38.63M

FrongusFrongus$0.000223+439.8%MC $215.3K

dogwifhat: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-01 01:47 UTC

Holder addresses

245,175

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$4,931,953.13

How concentrated is dogwifhat ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 245,175 addresses (2026-05-01 01:47 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling dogwifhat?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is dogwifhat liquidity falling?: As of 2026-05-01 01:47 UTC, reported liquidity was $4,931,953.13. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-01 01:47 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of May 1, 01:47 AM UTC

FDV

$185,171,800

Liquidity

$4,931,953.13

Holders

245,175

Snipers

Not available

Risk

High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

High

Sentiment

Neutral

dogwifhat ($WIF) is a well-known Solana meme token trading at $0.1854 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$186M and ~$4.93M in total liquidity on Raydium. The token has a verified contract, is non-mutable, and has a large but declining holder base of 245,175. Price action over the past 24 hours shows modest recovery (+2.05%), though the broader 30-day holder trend is firmly negative (-9.60%). Supply concentration is elevated, with the top 10 holders controlling 44.3% of supply.

Key points

Verified, non-mutable contract with no mint/freeze authority concerns
Large established holder base of 245,175 wallets — one of the most recognized Solana meme tokens
Zero sniper activity detected in the first 1,000 blocks, indicating a clean launch
Significant $4.93M liquidity pool on Raydium providing meaningful depth
52% buy pressure vs 48% sell pressure over 24h — marginally net bullish

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24–72 hours

neutral

Price is consolidating in a tight range between ~$0.1797 and ~$0.1893 after a sharp spike to $0.2495 in candle [17] that was immediately rejected. The current price of ~$0.1854 sits near the middle of the recent range. With 52% buy pressure and a slight 24h gain of 2.05%, short-term bias is mildly bullish but momentum is weak. Expect continued range-bound action unless a catalyst emerges.

Target low

$0.1780

Target high

$0.1895

Support: $0.1797 (24h low, candle [24]), $0.1815 (candle [12] low), $0.1797 (candle [23] open)
Resistance: $0.1893 (candle [10] high), $0.1920 (psychological level), $0.2495 (candle [17] spike high — likely anomalous)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

The persistent and accelerating decline in holder count (-9.60% over 30 days, -3.20% over 7 days) signals sustained distribution pressure. Without a significant catalyst — such as a broader Solana meme season or major exchange listing — the token is likely to drift lower or remain range-bound at best. The FDV of $186M for a meme token with declining holders is a headwind.

Catalysts

Broader Solana ecosystem rally or meme season
Major centralized exchange listing
Viral social media moment or celebrity endorsement
Bitcoin/crypto market breakout above key resistance

Bullish factors

52% buy pressure over 24h — slight net buying
Price up 2.05% in 24h showing short-term recovery
Zero sniper activity — clean launch with no early dump risk from snipers
$4.93M liquidity provides reasonable depth for a meme token
Verified, non-mutable contract reduces rug risk

Bearish factors

Holder count declining at accelerating rate: -0.96% in 24h, -3.20% in 7d, -9.60% in 30d
Top 10 holders control 44.3% of supply — high concentration risk
Top 100 holders control 81.97% — extreme concentration
FDV of $186M is high for a meme token with declining engagement
Price well below any prior ATH, suggesting sustained downtrend from peak

Confidence: low. Meme token price action is highly sentiment-driven and difficult to predict. The 24-hour OHLC data shows a suspicious spike to $0.2495 (candle [17]) that may reflect a data anomaly or thin-liquidity wick, making technical analysis less reliable. Holder decline is a clear bearish signal, but meme tokens can reverse sharply on social catalysts.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: EKpQGS...zcjm
Total Supply: 998,839,187.54

Key Risks

Accelerating holder decline (-9.60% over 30 days) signals sustained disengagement
Very high supply concentration (top 100 = 81.97%) creates whale dump risk
Pure meme token with no utility — entirely sentiment-dependent
FDV of $186M is high relative to current engagement metrics

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Over the 24 hourly candles analyzed (2026-04-30T02:00Z to 2026-05-01T01:00Z), price ranged from a low of $0.17766 (candle [24]) to a high of $0.24945 (candle [17]). Candle [17] is a clear outlier — opening at $0.24945 and closing at $0.18419, representing a massive upper wick that was fully rejected, likely a thin-liquidity spike or data anomaly. Excluding this spike, the true range is approximately $0.17766–$0.18932. The most recent candles ([1]–[4]) show price stabilizing around $0.1850–$0.1853, forming a tight consolidation after recovering from the $0.1797 low seen in candle [24]. Volume peaked in candle [23] ($80,659) and candle [22] ($56,418) during the early UTC hours, then declined significantly through the day, with candle [3] recording only $2,353 — suggesting fading interest.

Trend

Short-term

Sideways

Medium-term

Downtrend

Short-term price action is sideways/consolidating in the $0.1797–$0.1893 range. The medium-term trend is bearish given the persistent holder decline and price trading well below any historical peak. No clear higher highs or higher lows are established in the 24h window; instead, price oscillates within a narrow band.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

52%

Sell

48%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.1825 (candle [4] close / candle [12] open zone)

Major support

$0.1777 (candle [24] low — 24h absolute low)

Immediate resistance

$0.1857 (current price / candle [1] high at $0.18530)

Major resistance

$0.1893 (candle [10] high — strongest intraday resistance)

The $0.1777–$0.1797 zone represents the key support floor established by candles [24] and [23]. A break below this level would open downside toward $0.17. On the upside, $0.1893 (candle [10] high) is the key resistance; a sustained break above this level would be technically constructive. The $0.2495 spike in candle [17] is treated as an anomalous wick and not a meaningful resistance level.

Notable patterns

Large rejection wick in candle [17] (open $0.2495, close $0.1842) — bearish engulfing / shooting star pattern indicating strong overhead rejection
Candle [23] shows a bullish recovery: open $0.1779, close $0.1848 — a strong bull candle off the lows
Candles [1]–[4] form a tight consolidation cluster around $0.1825–$0.1853 — potential base building or pre-breakdown coil
Declining volume trend from candle [23] to candle [3] — volume exhaustion pattern
Candle [11] shows a strong bull candle: open $0.1842, high $0.1892, close $0.1892 — local breakout attempt that failed to sustain

Liquidity

$4,931,953.13

Depth

Moderate

Slippage risk

Medium

Total liquidity of $4.93M on the Raydium pair (EP2ib6dYdEeqD8MfE2ezHCxX3kP3K2eLKkirfPm5eyMx) provides moderate depth relative to the $186M FDV — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of approximately 2.6%, which is thin. The 24h trading volume of ~$646K (buy + sell) against $4.93M liquidity represents a volume-to-liquidity ratio of ~13%, indicating reasonable but not exceptional turnover. Net flow is slightly positive (inflow) with $335.71K in buys vs $310.45K in sells. However, unique sellers (7,198) slightly outnumber unique buyers (6,836), suggesting more individual participants are selling even though buy volume in USD terms is higher — possibly indicating fewer but larger buy orders. The slippageRisk is rated medium: a $4.93M pool can absorb moderate trades but large whale exits could cause meaningful price impact. The anomalous candle [17] spike to $0.2495 may indicate a brief liquidity thin spot during low-activity hours.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

998,839,187.54

FDV

$185,171,800.26

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Meme token with no fundamental utility. The 24h OHLC shows a spike from $0.1842 to $0.2495 and back — a 35% intraday wick. Price is highly sensitive to sentiment shifts and social media trends.
Liquiditymedium
$4.93M liquidity provides moderate depth, but the liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~2.6% means large holders exiting could cause significant slippage. Thin hours (as seen in candle [17]) can produce extreme price dislocations.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Accelerating holder decline (-9.60% over 30 days) signals sustained disengagement
Very high supply concentration (top 100 = 81.97%) creates whale dump risk
Pure meme token with no utility — entirely sentiment-dependent
FDV of $186M is high relative to current engagement metrics
Thin liquidity relative to FDV (~2.6%) amplifies price impact of large trades
Broader crypto market downturn could disproportionately impact meme tokens

Mitigating factors

Zero sniper activity — clean, organic launch
Verified, non-mutable contract reduces technical rug risk
Established brand recognition as one of Solana's most well-known meme tokens
$4.93M liquidity is substantial for a meme token
Large holder base of 245,175 provides community breadth
52% buy pressure over 24h shows marginal net buying interest
Social presence across Reddit, Telegram, Twitter, and website indicates active community

Suitable for

Suitable only for high-risk-tolerant, speculative investors who understand meme token dynamics and can afford to lose their entire investment. Not suitable for conservative investors, those seeking yield or utility, or those with short investment horizons without active monitoring. Position sizing should be small relative to total portfolio.

$WIF is an established Solana meme token with strong brand recognition, a clean launch (zero snipers), and a verified non-mutable contract. However, the investment case is challenged by an accelerating holder decline (-9.60% over 30 days), very high supply concentration (top 100 = 81.97%), and a $186M FDV that demands sustained community enthusiasm to justify. The token is a pure sentiment play — its value is entirely dependent on meme culture momentum and broader crypto market conditions.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Solana meme season revival drives $WIF back toward prior highs. A viral social moment, major exchange listing, or broader crypto bull run catalyzes renewed retail interest, reversing the holder decline and pushing price toward $0.35–$0.50+.

Broader Solana ecosystem rally and meme season
Major CEX listing (Tier-1 exchange)
Viral social media moment or celebrity endorsement
Bitcoin breaking to new ATH driving retail FOMO into meme tokens
Community-driven marketing campaign gaining traction

Base Case

Price remains range-bound between $0.16–$0.20 over the next 30 days. Holder decline continues at a moderate pace (-5% to -8% monthly) but stabilizes as long-term holders remain. Trading volume stays thin, and the token maintains its position as a recognized but mature Solana meme token.

No major positive or negative catalysts emerge
Broader crypto market remains range-bound
Top 2 holders (likely CEX wallets) do not redistribute holdings
Community maintains baseline social media presence
Liquidity pool remains stable at ~$4–5M

Bear Case

Medium probability

Holder decline accelerates further as retail interest wanes. Whale distribution from top holders (positions 3–10) creates sustained sell pressure. Price drifts toward $0.10–$0.12 support zone as the meme narrative fades without a catalyst.

Continued acceleration of holder decline beyond -10% monthly
Whale exit from top 3–10 holder positions
Broader crypto market correction reducing risk appetite
Competing meme tokens capturing community attention
Failure to generate new viral moments or exchange listings

Analysis details

Generated

May 1, 01:47 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-01 01:47 UTC

Model confidence

Medium

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (Mint: EKpQGSJtjMFqKZ9KQanSqYXRcF8fBopzLHYxdM65zcjm)
Raydium DEX pair data (EP2ib6dYdEeqD8MfE2ezHCxX3kP3K2eLKkirfPm5eyMx)
24-hour OHLC hourly candles (USD)
Trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
Holder metrics and historical holder series (30 days daily)
Top 20 holder addresses and balances
Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks)
Token metadata fields (update authority, mutable status, verified status)

Limitations

Mint and freeze authority status not explicitly provided — inferred from mutable:false metadata flag only
Top holder classifications are inferred from address patterns and balance sizes, not confirmed on-chain labels
The anomalous candle [17] spike to $0.2495 may be a data artifact or thin-liquidity event, reducing technical analysis reliability
Sniper data shows zero snipers but methodology (first 1,000 blocks only) may not capture all early activity
Historical holder data is daily granularity only — intraday holder movements not visible
No order book depth data available — slippage estimates are approximations based on pool size
Social sentiment data not quantitatively analyzed — only presence of social links confirmed

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, particularly meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is dogwifhat ($WIF) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 24, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell dogwifhat ($WIF)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 24, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is dogwifhat ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 245,175 addresses (2026-05-01 01:47 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling dogwifhat?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is dogwifhat liquidity falling?

As of 2026-05-01 01:47 UTC, reported liquidity was $4,931,953.13. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for dogwifhat ($WIF)?

Is $WIF a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as high with a risk score of 7.2/100. Suitable only for high-risk-tolerant, speculative investors who understand meme token dynamics and can afford to lose their entire investment. Not suitable for conservative investors, those seeking yield or utility, or those with short investment horizons without active monitoring. Position sizing should be small relative to total portfolio.

What are the key risks of holding $WIF?

Accelerating holder decline (-9.60% over 30 days) signals sustained disengagement • Very high supply concentration (top 100 = 81.97%) creates whale dump risk • Pure meme token with no utility — entirely sentiment-dependent