How concentrated is catwifhat ownership?

The top-10 share isn't in this report; it counted 565 holder addresses (2026-06-04 23:17 UTC).

Are large holders selling catwifhat?

Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.

Is catwifhat liquidity falling?

Not measured: this report has no liquidity reading.

catwifhat Price Today & AI Analysis

WIFSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 4, 2026

$0.0₅3625

Contract

Live

Hjj93YiyaFYY8zY2EW6FM2i2gd4rxzhoLCLFabrRpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

207

Market cap

$3,622

At a $1M market cap, $WIF would be $0.001001 (276x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

WIF support and resistance today

From 1-hour candles

WIF trades at $0.000003625 as of Nov 7, 23:50 UTC, +0.0% in 24 hours. No trade has moved the price in 3 days, so there is no fresh support or resistance to mark.

Is WIF a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 5

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

2.4%4 insiders still holding

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about WIF

3 free answers a day

catwifhat: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-04 23:17 UTC

Holder addresses

565

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

Not available

How concentrated is catwifhat ownership?: The top-10 share isn't in this report; it counted 565 holder addresses (2026-06-04 23:17 UTC).
Are large holders selling catwifhat?: Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.
Is catwifhat liquidity falling?: Not measured: this report has no liquidity reading.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-04 23:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jun 4, 11:17 PM UTC

FDV

Liquidity

Not available

Holders

565

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

catwifhat (WIF) is a Pump.fun-launched meme token on Solana (mint: Hjj93YiyaFYY8zY2EW6FM2i2gd4rxzhoLCLFabrRpump) with a total supply of 1,000,000,000 tokens. The token exhibits extreme red flags: $0 liquidity, $0 FDV, 91.3% sell pressure in the last 24h ($37.69K sell vs $3.59K buy volume), and a holder base that was essentially dormant at 11 holders for the entire prior 30-day period before a sudden spike to 565 holders in the last 24 hours. No price data, no OHLC candles, no top holder data, and no sniper data are available, severely limiting analytical depth. The token appears to be in a terminal distribution or abandonment phase.

Key points

Pump.fun origin with 'pump' suffix in mint address indicating bonding-curve launch
Extreme sell pressure: 91.3% of 24h volume is sells (953 sells vs 78 buys)
Zero on-chain liquidity ($0.00 total liquidity) — effectively untradeable at scale
Holder base was flat at 11 for 30 days, then surged +554 (+98%) in 24h — highly anomalous
No price data available, suggesting the token may have lost all discoverable market value

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24–72 hours

bearish

Target low

~$0.00 (effectively zero)

Target high

Unknown — no price data available

Support: No identifiable support — $0 liquidity renders support levels meaningless
Resistance: No identifiable resistance — no OHLC data available

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

Without liquidity, active development, or a verifiable use case, the medium-term outlook is deeply bearish. The token's 30-day holder stagnation (11 holders for the entire period) followed by a sudden 24h spike is consistent with coordinated wash activity or a bot-driven holder inflation event rather than organic growth.

Catalysts

Any re-listing or liquidity injection could temporarily revive price
Broader Solana meme-coin cycle could briefly lift sentiment
No positive catalysts are identifiable from current on-chain data

Bullish factors

Holder count surged +554 in 24h, which could indicate growing awareness
Token has social links (Twitter, Moralis) suggesting some community presence
Mutable=false metadata reduces one vector of rug risk

Bearish factors

$0.00 total liquidity — token cannot be meaningfully traded
91.3% sell pressure ($37.69K sells vs $3.59K buys) in 24h
953 sell transactions vs only 78 buy transactions in 24h
No price data available — likely reflects near-zero or undiscoverable value
Holder base was completely flat at 11 for 30 days prior to a suspicious 24h spike
Unverified contract, unknown update authority, unknown FDV
Zero supply concentration data (top10=0%, top100=0%) — data anomaly suggesting indexer failure or abandoned token

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the complete absence of price data, OHLC candles, FDV, and top holder information. All directional assessments are derived solely from volume imbalance, liquidity absence, and holder anomalies.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: Hjj93Y...pump
Total Supply: 1,000,000,000 WIF

Key Risks

$0.00 total liquidity — token is functionally untradeable
91.3% sell pressure with 10.5x more sell volume than buy volume in 24h
Suspicious holder spike: flat at 11 for 30 days, then +554 in 24h
Copycat token name ('catwifhat WIF') mimicking the legitimate dogwifhat (WIF) project

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

No OHLC candle data is available for this token. Technical analysis based on price action, candlestick patterns, and chart structure cannot be performed. All technical observations are derived from volume and trading analytics only.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

With no OHLC data available, trend direction is inferred from trading analytics. The 91.3% sell pressure ratio and 953 sells vs 78 buys over 24h strongly imply a sustained downtrend. Price change is reported as 0% across all timeframes (5m, 1h, 6h, 24h), which combined with $0 liquidity suggests the token is effectively frozen at a near-zero or undiscoverable price.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

Sell

91%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

Undeterminable — no OHLC data or liquidity depth available

Major support

Undeterminable — no OHLC data available

Immediate resistance

Undeterminable — no OHLC data available

Major resistance

Undeterminable — no OHLC data available

No price levels can be derived without OHLC candle data. The $0 liquidity figure means there is no meaningful order book depth to define support or resistance zones.

Notable patterns

No candlestick patterns identifiable — OHLC data absent
Volume anomaly: 953 sell transactions vs 78 buy transactions (12.2:1 ratio) in 24h
Holder spike anomaly: flat at 11 holders for 30 days, then +554 in a single 24h window
0% price change across all timeframes despite significant sell volume — suggests price is pegged at zero or data is stale

Liquidity

Not available

Depth

Not assessed

Slippage risk

Not assessed

Liquidity depth and slippage risk cannot be assessed without a liquidity observation.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1,000,000,000 WIF

FDV

$0.00 (reported) — effectively unknown/zero

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
No price data available, but the combination of $0 liquidity, 91.3% sell pressure, and a Pump.fun bonding-curve origin implies extreme price volatility. Any price discovery that occurs will be subject to massive swings.
LiquidityNot assessed
A liquidity observation is not available in the saved inputs.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

$0.00 total liquidity — token is functionally untradeable
91.3% sell pressure with 10.5x more sell volume than buy volume in 24h
Suspicious holder spike: flat at 11 for 30 days, then +554 in 24h
Copycat token name ('catwifhat WIF') mimicking the legitimate dogwifhat (WIF) project
No price data, no OHLC data, no top holder data — severe information gaps
Unverified contract with unknown authority status
Zero FDV — no market value is currently discoverable
Pump.fun bonding-curve token with likely exhausted or removed liquidity

Mitigating factors

Metadata is immutable (mutable=false), reducing post-launch metadata manipulation risk
Token has social links (Twitter, Moralis) indicating some level of community presence
Not flagged as spam by the data provider
561 of 565 holders acquired via swap, suggesting some genuine trading interest

Suitable for

This token is unsuitable for virtually all investor profiles. The combination of zero liquidity, extreme sell pressure, suspicious holder patterns, copycat branding, and complete absence of price/valuation data makes this an extremely high-risk asset. Only highly experienced traders with a very high risk tolerance, who fully understand they may lose 100% of any capital deployed, should consider any interaction with this token — and even then, extreme caution is warranted.

catwifhat (WIF) presents no credible investment thesis at this time. The token exhibits nearly every hallmark of a failed or manipulated Pump.fun launch: zero liquidity, overwhelming sell pressure, copycat branding, suspicious holder activity, and a complete absence of fundamental or technical data. The only scenario in which this token could generate returns involves speculative meme-coin momentum that is entirely unsupported by current on-chain data.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Speculative meme revival: If the broader Solana meme-coin market enters a euphoric cycle and 'catwifhat' gains viral traction on social media, a liquidity injection and renewed buying interest could temporarily revive the token. The 554 new holders in 24h could represent the beginning of organic community formation.

Viral social media moment or influencer promotion
Liquidity injection by team or market makers
Broader Solana meme-coin bull cycle lifting all tokens
Community-driven revival effort

Base Case

Continued dormancy with occasional speculative spikes: The token remains at or near zero value with sporadic low-volume trading activity. The recent holder spike fades as new entrants realize the token has no liquidity or utility. The token persists on-chain but generates no meaningful returns.

No new liquidity is injected
The 554 new holders represent speculative/bot activity that will not sustain
No major social media catalyst emerges
Sell pressure continues to dominate any residual buy activity

Bear Case

High probability

Complete abandonment: The token continues its current trajectory — zero liquidity, no new buyers, and the 554 recent 'holders' prove to be bots or wash traders who quickly exit. The token becomes permanently dormant with no recoverable value.

$0 liquidity with no signs of replenishment
91.3% sell pressure indicating active distribution by all meaningful holders
Copycat branding with no differentiation from legitimate WIF token
30-day holder stagnation pattern suggesting the project was dormant/abandoned before the anomalous 24h spike
No verified contract, no FDV, no price discovery

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 4, 11:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-04 23:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain Solana token metadata (Pump.fun mint)
Trading analytics (24h volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
Holder metrics and historical holder time series (30-day daily)
Supply concentration data
Token acquisition breakdown (swap/transfer/airdrop)

Limitations

No price data available — all price-related analysis is qualitative
No OHLC candle data — technical analysis is severely limited
No top holder data — whale map and concentration analysis are incomplete
No sniper/early buyer data — smart money signals cannot be quantified
FDV and market cap are unknown ($0 reported)
Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are all unknown
Supply concentration reports 0% for top 10 and top 100, which is likely a data indexing error
The token's copycat name/symbol may cause confusion with the legitimate dogwifhat (WIF) project

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially meme tokens on Pump.fun, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data gaps in this analysis are significant and materially limit the reliability of any conclusions drawn. Do not make investment decisions based solely on this report.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is catwifhat (WIF) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Nov 5, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell catwifhat (WIF)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 5, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

What is the short-term price outlook for catwifhat (WIF)?

No price data or OHLC candles are available, making precise price targets impossible. However, with $0 reported liquidity, 91.3% sell pressure, and 953 sell transactions vs 78 buys in the last 24h, any residual price discovery is overwhelmingly to the downside. The token is functionally illiquid. Short-term outlook is bearish (24–72 hours), with a target range of ~$0.00 (effectively zero) to Unknown — no price data available.

Is WIF a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.4/100. This token is unsuitable for virtually all investor profiles. The combination of zero liquidity, extreme sell pressure, suspicious holder patterns, copycat branding, and complete absence of price/valuation data makes this an extremely high-risk asset. Only highly experienced traders with a very high risk tolerance, who fully understand they may lose 100% of any capital deployed, should consider any interaction with this token — and even then, extreme caution is warranted.

What are the key risks of holding WIF?

$0.00 total liquidity — token is functionally untradeable • 91.3% sell pressure with 10.5x more sell volume than buy volume in 24h • Suspicious holder spike: flat at 11 for 30 days, then +554 in 24h