COPCAT

Copper Cat Price Today & AI Analysis

COPCATSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 21, 2026

Price

$0.001449

+3120.33% 24h · FDV $1,448,622

Contract

Live
HhcfXbZ2rukoKx8oAH8rfkmzXbwvfdh6MMLZjneg4rWk

Chain

Solana

Holders

3,374

Market cap

$1,448,622

More tokens on Solana

CATECATECatecoin$0.1033-15.6%MC $99.59MUURAGlobal X Uranium ETF - Backpack Securities$43.9-6.3%MC $1.38MANTFUNANTFUNAntFun$0.0816-2.0%MC $723.80MSPCXxSPCXxSpaceX xStock$152.59-0.1%MC $85.45MDUMBCOINDUMBCOINDumb meme coin$0.043802-15.2%MC $37.4KSAISAISairium$0.053014-87.1%MC $301.4K

Copper Cat: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-21 22:16 UTC

Holder addresses

3,374

Top 10 supply share

24.07%

Reported liquidity

$56,996.00
How concentrated is Copper Cat ownership?
As of 2026-09-21 22:16 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 24.07% of supply. It reports 3,374 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Copper Cat?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-21 22:16 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $2,518,662.00 in buys and $2,432,763.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Copper Cat liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +1314.68%, from $6,556.92 (2026-09-21 19:00 UTC) to $92,759.64 (2026-09-21 22:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-21 22:16 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-21 19:00 UTC$6,556.92
2026-09-21 20:00 UTC$42,660.74
2026-09-21 21:00 UTC$101,179.87
2026-09-21 22:00 UTC$92,759.64

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about COPCAT

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 21, 10:17 PM UTC

FDV

$1,448,622

Liquidity

$56,996.00

Holders

3,374

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Copper Cat (COPCAT) is a Raydium CPMM-traded micro-cap token that experienced an extreme parabolic move (+3120% over 24h) alongside extremely thin liquidity ($57K). The token shows classic characteristics of a freshly-launched, highly volatile meme coin: massive intraday candle ranges (2-3 orders of magnitude within hours), 3,374 holder addresses, and top-10 wallets controlling ~24% of supply. No sniper data, no mint/freeze authority data, and no holder history are available, which severely limits due-diligence confidence. The description field ('Steal that shit.') and lack of verification signal a low-effort, high-risk speculative asset rather than a fundamentally-backed project.

Key points

  • Extreme 24h price appreciation (+3120%) driven by very low starting liquidity
  • Total liquidity is only ~$57K against a $1.45M FDV, implying high slippage and fragile price support
  • Top-10 holders control ~24% of supply based on current snapshot only (no historical trend available)
  • No sniper, mint/freeze authority, or holder-history data provided, leaving major risk vectors unverified
  • Nearly balanced but massive 24h buy ($2.52M) vs sell ($2.43M) volume suggests intense two-sided speculative churn, not organic adoption

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

The 5m price change of -16.48% following a +103% 1h spike and a +3120% 24h move suggests the token is in a blow-off-top / cooldown phase after a violent pump. With only $57K total liquidity, the price is highly susceptible to sharp reversals on both sides as large orders move through thin order books. Short-term direction leans bearish/consolidating after the parabolic spike, though volatility could produce further violent swings in either direction.

Target low

$0.0008

Target high

$0.0022

Support

$0.00143 (last candle low/close area), $0.0005 (candle 3 low)

Resistance

$0.00222 (candle 4 high), $0.00492 (candle 3 high, all-time high seen in data)

Medium term · 3-14 days

neutral

Medium-term outlook is highly uncertain given the absence of historical holder trend data, sniper data, and authority verification. Sustainability of the current valuation depends heavily on whether liquidity deepens and whether the ~24% top-10 concentration begins distributing into the open market. Without more data on holder behavior over time, no confident directional call can be made.

Catalysts

  • Potential liquidity additions or removals by the pool creator
  • Continued social/twitter-driven speculative interest
  • Large holder (top-10, ~24% of supply) profit-taking or accumulation
  • Possible listing on additional venues increasing liquidity depth

Bullish factors

  • Very strong 24h buy volume ($2.52M) with 6,628 unique buyers indicates active speculative demand
  • Buy pressure (50.9%) slightly exceeds sell pressure (49.1%) in the 24h window
  • Rapid holder growth to 3,374 addresses suggests viral attention

Bearish factors

  • Extreme parabolic run-up historically precedes sharp mean-reversion corrections
  • Total liquidity of only $57K vs $1.45M FDV creates very high slippage and manipulation risk
  • 5m price change already shows a -16.48% pullback, a warning sign of momentum exhaustion
  • Top-10 wallets hold ~24% of supply with no visibility into their trading intent
  • No mint/freeze authority renouncement confirmation — rug risk cannot be ruled out

Confidence: low. Only 4 hourly candles are available, liquidity is extremely thin ($57K), and critical risk datasets (sniper activity, mint/freeze authority status, holder history) are entirely missing. Price predictions in such an environment are speculative at best.

COPCAT call history

Full track record →

Sep 21bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
HhcfXb...4rWk
Total Supply
999,999,659.30 COPCAT

Key Risks

  • Extremely thin liquidity ($57K) relative to trading volume and valuation, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Parabolic +3120% 24h move followed by signs of momentum exhaustion (long upper wick rejection, declining volume, negative 5m change) increases risk of sharp reversal
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply dilution or account freezing
  • No sniper data available, so early-buyer/bot dump risk is entirely unverified

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 4 hourly candles are available. Candle 1 opened at $0.0000064 and closed at $0.0000121, a modest gain within a wide range. Candle 2 exploded from $0.0000121 to a high of $0.00100 before closing at $0.00069 — a massive bullish expansion candle (~9,700% intra-candle range). Candle 3 continued higher, opening at $0.00069, spiking to an intra-candle high of $0.00492 (the highest print in the dataset), then pulling back sharply to close at $0.00175 — a classic long-upper-wick blow-off/rejection candle. Candle 4 opened at $0.00175, made a modest new attempt to $0.00222, but closed lower at $0.00143, continuing the pullback pattern with lower highs and lower closes than candle 3's peak.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Medium-term the token is up enormously from its starting price (candle 1 open ~$0.0000064 to current ~$0.00145), but short-term price action over the last two candles shows a clear pullback from the $0.00492 peak, with lower highs and a declining close — indicating short-term downtrend/consolidation after a parabolic spike.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00143 (candle 4 close/low)

Major support

$0.0005 (candle 3 low)

Immediate resistance

$0.00222 (candle 4 high)

Major resistance

$0.00492 (candle 3 high, dataset ATH)

Price is currently trading between the candle 4 range of $0.00143-$0.00222 after rejecting hard from the $0.00492 high set in candle 3. A break below $0.00143 could expose the $0.0005 support zone, while reclaiming $0.00222 would be needed to challenge the $0.00492 resistance again.

Notable patterns

  • Long upper-wick rejection candle at the $0.00492 high (candle 3), signaling exhaustion/blow-off top
  • Sequential lower highs across candles 3 and 4 following the spike
  • Sharp volume decline (from $4.71M to $353K) after the price peak, confirming fading momentum
  • Extremely wide intra-candle ranges typical of low-liquidity micro-cap parabolic moves

Liquidity

Liquidity

$56,996.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of only $57K is extremely shallow relative to the $1.45M fully diluted valuation and the $2.52M/$2.43M in 24h buy/sell volume — implying that actual pool depth is being turned over dozens of times per day and that large trades will incur significant slippage. Buy volume slightly exceeds sell volume (50.9% vs 49.1%), producing a marginal net inflow, and unique buyers (6,628) outnumber unique sellers (5,066), which is a mildly bullish signal in isolation. However, given the tiny liquidity base, this volume level is far more consistent with high-frequency speculative trading/wash-like churn than with a healthy, sustainable market.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,999,659.30 COPCAT

FDV

$1.45M

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change of +3120%, 1h change of +103%, and a -16.48% 5m reversal demonstrate extreme volatility; candle ranges spanning multiple orders of magnitude within a single hour confirm this is a highly unstable, immature market.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $57K against $1.45M FDV and multi-million dollar daily volume, meaning large trades will face severe slippage and the pool could be drained or manipulated with relatively modest capital.

  • Concentrationmedium

    Top-10 holders control ~24.07% of supply per the current Codex snapshot. Top-100 concentration and any historical trend are unavailable, so the full concentration picture (and whether it is worsening) cannot be assessed — this figure alone warrants caution but is not extreme on its face.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely thin liquidity ($57K) relative to trading volume and valuation, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Parabolic +3120% 24h move followed by signs of momentum exhaustion (long upper wick rejection, declining volume, negative 5m change) increases risk of sharp reversal
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply dilution or account freezing
  • No sniper data available, so early-buyer/bot dump risk is entirely unverified
  • Top-10 wallets hold ~24% of supply with no visibility into their intentions or history
  • Token description ('Steal that shit.') and unverified contract status suggest low legitimacy/effort project, typical of high-risk speculative meme tokens
  • Unverified contract status and unknown 'possible spam' flag further reduce confidence in project legitimacy

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy volume ($2.52M) modestly exceeds sell volume ($2.43M), and unique buyers (6,628) exceed unique sellers (5,066), indicating net speculative demand at present
  • Holder base of 3,374 addresses suggests some organic distribution of tokens rather than concentration in a handful of wallets, though this cannot be verified over time

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and can absorb the possibility of total capital loss. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, retirement-oriented allocations, or anyone unable to actively monitor extremely volatile, low-liquidity positions. Given multiple critical unknowns (authorities, sniper activity, holder history), position sizing should be minimal if entered at all.

COPCAT is a newly-viral, extremely volatile Solana meme token that has posted a +3120% 24h gain on the back of thin ($57K) liquidity and heavy two-sided volume. The setup is characteristic of a speculative mania that may already be cooling, evidenced by a rejection candle at $0.00492, declining volume, and a negative 5-minute price change. Critical risk data — mint/freeze authority status, sniper activity, and holder history — are all unavailable, making this a high-uncertainty, high-risk speculative bet rather than an evidence-backed investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued viral social momentum (Twitter-driven) attracts sustained new buyer inflow, liquidity deepens as more capital enters the pool, and the token stabilizes at a higher valuation plateau with the ~24% top-10 concentration remaining passive.

  • Sustained social media attention and community growth beyond the current 3,374 holders
  • Net positive buy/sell volume ratio (50.9%/49.1%) and more unique buyers than sellers in the 24h window continuing
  • New liquidity providers entering the shallow $57K pool to reduce slippage risk

Base Case

The token continues to trade with extreme volatility in a wide range, oscillating between the $0.0005-$0.00492 zone established in the recent candles, without clear directional resolution until liquidity conditions or new catalysts change materially.

  • No major liquidity injection or removal occurs in the near term
  • No resolution of the mint/freeze authority or sniper-data unknowns becomes available
  • Speculative trading interest persists at a reduced but non-zero level relative to the initial spike

Bear Case

High probability

The parabolic spike was a short-lived speculative mania; early/large holders (including the unverified top-10 wallets holding ~24% of supply) distribute into retail demand, volume dries up further (already down from $4.71M to $353K hourly), and price collapses back toward pre-spike levels given the extremely thin liquidity base.

  • Sharp volume decline after the price peak (candle 3 to candle 4: -92.5%)
  • Rejection wick and lower highs/lower closes in the most recent candles
  • Extremely thin liquidity ($57K) makes the token vulnerable to a rapid, severe price collapse on modest sell pressure
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority and unverified contract status leave rug-pull risk unquantified

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 21, 10:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-21 22:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
  • Hourly OHLCV candle data (4 most recent candles)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price % changes)
  • Raydium CPMM liquidity pool data
  • Codex holder aggregate snapshot (holder count, top-10 concentration)

Limitations

  • Only 4 hourly candles were provided, severely limiting technical analysis depth and pattern reliability
  • No sniper/early-buyer data was available, preventing assessment of launch-phase dump risk
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, and contract verification status are all unknown, preventing a full rug-risk assessment
  • Holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) is unavailable; only a single current snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration was provided
  • Top-100 holder concentration was not provided
  • Total liquidity figure ($57K) is a single point-in-time value with no historical context on stability

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided, which contains significant gaps (sniper activity, authority status, holder history). Cryptocurrency investments, particularly in low-liquidity meme tokens, carry substantial risk of total loss. Conduct independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Copper Cat ownership?

As of 2026-09-21 22:16 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 24.07% of supply. It reports 3,374 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Copper Cat?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-21 22:16 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $2,518,662.00 in buys and $2,432,763.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Copper Cat liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +1314.68%, from $6,556.92 (2026-09-21 19:00 UTC) to $92,759.64 (2026-09-21 22:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Copper Cat (COPCAT)?

The 5m price change of -16.48% following a +103% 1h spike and a +3120% 24h move suggests the token is in a blow-off-top / cooldown phase after a violent pump. With only $57K total liquidity, the price is highly susceptible to sharp reversals on both sides as large orders move through thin order books. Short-term direction leans bearish/consolidating after the parabolic spike, though volatility could produce further violent swings in either direction. Short-term outlook is bearish (1-24 hours), with a target range of $0.0008 to $0.0022.

Is COPCAT a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and can absorb the possibility of total capital loss. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, retirement-oriented allocations, or anyone unable to actively monitor extremely volatile, low-liquidity positions. Given multiple critical unknowns (authorities, sniper activity, holder history), position sizing should be minimal if entered at all.

What are the key risks of holding COPCAT?

Extremely thin liquidity ($57K) relative to trading volume and valuation, creating high slippage and manipulation potential • Parabolic +3120% 24h move followed by signs of momentum exhaustion (long upper wick rejection, declining volume, negative 5m change) increases risk of sharp reversal • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply dilution or account freezing

← Back to all predictions

Track COPCAT