U

Global X Uranium ETF - Backpack Securities Price Today & AI Analysis

URASolanaAnalysis as of Sep 21, 2026

Price

$43.9

-6.25% 24h · FDV $1,381,545

Contract

Live
URARfsinxCRw4JpvQhuT4CxavdZXZEMjv9ZwWmWpwag

Chain

Solana

Holders

5,346

Market cap

$1,381,545

More tokens on Solana

PUMPPUMPPump$0.004035-3.5%MC $3.36BCATECATECatecoin$0.1033-15.6%MC $99.59MANTFUNANTFUNAntFun$0.0816-2.0%MC $723.80MSPCXxSPCXxSpaceX xStock$152.59-0.1%MC $85.45MDUMBCOINDUMBCOINDumb meme coin$0.043802-15.2%MC $37.4KSAISAISairium$0.053014-87.1%MC $301.4K

Global X Uranium ETF - Backpack Securities: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-21 16:15 UTC

Holder addresses

5,346

Top 10 supply share

17.48%

Reported liquidity

$418,226.00
How concentrated is Global X Uranium ETF - Backpack Securities ownership?
As of 2026-09-21 16:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 17.48% of supply. It reports 5,346 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Global X Uranium ETF - Backpack Securities?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-21 16:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $2,478,266.00 in buys and $2,619,373.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Global X Uranium ETF - Backpack Securities liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +730.46%, from $146,065.32 (2026-09-21 14:00 UTC) to $1,213,009.50 (2026-09-21 16:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-21 16:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-21 14:00 UTC$146,065.32
2026-09-21 15:00 UTC$1,292,003.23
2026-09-21 16:00 UTC$1,213,009.50

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about URA

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 21, 04:16 PM UTC

FDV

$1,381,545

Liquidity

$418,226.00

Holders

5,346

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

URA (Global X Uranium ETF - Backpack Securities) is a tokenized proxy trading on Raydium CLMM at ~$43.90, down 6.25% over 24h. Total supply is small (~31,471 tokens) with an FDV of ~$1.38M against total liquidity of only ~$418K. Recent hourly candles show extreme volatility (a swing from ~$44 to ~$56 and back to ~$43 within 3 hours), and 24h trading volume ($2.48M buys / $2.62M sells) massively exceeds both liquidity and FDV, suggesting very high turnover, thin liquidity relative to flow, and possible wash trading or aggressive market-making. Holder aggregates show 5,346 holder addresses with top-10 wallets controlling ~17.5% of supply — a snapshot only, with no history available to assess trend. Mint/freeze authority status, verification, and sniper data are all unavailable, leaving material gaps in due diligence.

Key points

  • Extremely high volume-to-liquidity ratio (~$5.1M combined 24h volume vs ~$418K liquidity) implies thin market depth relative to trading activity
  • Sharp intraday volatility: price spiked from ~$44 to ~$56 then fell back to ~$43 within a 3-hour window
  • No verifiable mint/freeze authority status or contract verification data available
  • Top-10 holders control only ~17.5% of supply per current snapshot, but no historical trend data exists to confirm this is stable or improving
  • No sniper data available, precluding assessment of early-buyer dumping risk

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

Price fell 6.25% in the last 24h and the most recent hourly candles show a clear reversal from a spike high of $56.19 down to $43.03-$43.94, closing near $43.76. Momentum in the immediate term is negative after the failed breakout, with sell volume (51.4%) modestly outweighing buy volume (48.6%). Watch for further downside toward the $43.03 intraday low or a bounce attempt if buy pressure recovers.

Target low

$40.00

Target high

$48.00

Support

$43.03 (candle 2 low), $40.00 (psychological/extension)

Resistance

$44.33-$44.34 (recent open/resistance), $54.52-$56.19 (recent spike high, likely major overhead resistance)

Medium term · 3-7 days

neutral

With only 3 hourly candles provided, medium-term trend cannot be reliably established. The extreme volatility (a >27% intra-period range) combined with thin liquidity ($418K) relative to volume suggests the token could swing sharply in either direction depending on flow dynamics. Absent holder history, sniper data, and broader candle history, medium-term directional conviction is low.

Catalysts

  • Potential continued liquidity thinning increasing volatility
  • Any change in buy/sell pressure balance (currently near 50/50, slightly sell-heavy)
  • Unknown catalysts related to the underlying 'ETF' branding/backing, which is unverifiable on-chain

Bullish factors

  • Very short-term 5m price change is slightly positive (+0.10%)
  • 24h buy volume ($2.48M) is substantial in absolute terms, indicating active interest
  • Large number of unique buyers (5,322) in 24h shows broad participation

Bearish factors

  • 24h price down 6.25%, with sell volume exceeding buy volume (51.4% vs 48.6%)
  • Sharp reversal from intraday high of $56.19 back down to ~$43.76, a ~22% retracement within hours
  • Total liquidity ($418K) is very thin relative to 24h volume (~$5.1M combined), raising slippage and manipulation risk
  • 24h sellers (24,798 transactions, 5,153 unique) slightly exceed buyers in transaction count

Confidence: low. Only 3 hourly candles were provided, which is insufficient to establish a robust technical trend. Liquidity is thin relative to volume, authority/verification data is missing, and holder/sniper history is unavailable — all of which materially limit predictive confidence.

URA call history

Full track record →

Sep 21bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
URARfs...pwag
Total Supply
31,471.402898

Key Risks

  • Extremely thin liquidity ($418K) relative to trading volume (~$5.1M/24h), creating high slippage and price manipulation potential
  • Violent intraday volatility (spike to $56.19 followed by ~22% crash within the same data window)
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out supply inflation or account freezing risk
  • No sniper/early-buyer data available to assess dump risk from initial holders

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (14:00 UTC) opened at $44.33 and rallied to close at $54.52, a strong bullish move with high volume ($1.66M). Candle 2 (15:00 UTC) opened at $54.52, spiked to a high of $56.19, then reversed sharply to close at $43.87 — a large bearish reversal candle with a huge range ($43.06-$56.19) and the highest volume of the set ($19.79M), indicating a blow-off top followed by heavy selling/distribution. Candle 3 (16:00 UTC) opened at $43.87 and drifted down to close at $43.76 on much lower volume ($822K), suggesting the initial panic selling has subsided but no clear reversal yet.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

The very short-term trend (last 2 candles) is downward following a sharp spike-and-reject pattern. With only 3 candles, medium-term trend cannot be confidently characterized beyond 'sideways/uncertain' given the extreme volatility.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

49%

Sell

51%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$43.03

Major support

$40.00 (unconfirmed, extrapolated)

Immediate resistance

$44.33

Major resistance

$56.19

The $43.03 level (candle 2 intraday low) has held as support through candle 3's close near $43.76-$43.94. The $44.33 level (candle 1 open) is the nearest resistance being tested. The $54.52-$56.19 zone represents the recent spike high and is the major resistance, now far overhead following the sharp rejection. Given only 3 candles of data, these levels are provisional and should be validated with more historical data.

Notable patterns

  • Spike-and-reject / blow-off top pattern in candle 2 (high $56.19 vs close $43.87)
  • Large upper wick on candle 2 indicating rejection of higher prices
  • Volume climax on candle 2 followed by sharp volume contraction in candle 3, typical of exhaustion after a volatile move

Liquidity

Liquidity

$418,226.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of $418.23K is very shallow relative to 24h combined trading volume of roughly $5.1M (a ~12x volume-to-liquidity ratio), indicating that large trades can move price significantly, consistent with the observed intraday spike from $44 to $56.19 and subsequent crash back to ~$43.76. 24h sell volume ($2.62M) modestly exceeds buy volume ($2.48M), producing a net outflow bias and 51.4% sell pressure vs 48.6% buy pressure. Despite this, unique buyers (5,322) and sellers (5,153) are roughly balanced in participant count, and both buy/sell transaction counts (20,909 buys vs 24,798 sells) show slightly more sell-side activity. This combination of thin liquidity and heavy volume implies high slippage risk for any meaningfully sized trade.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

31,471.402898

FDV

$1,381,545

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Intraday candles show a swing from $44.33 to a high of $56.19 and back down to $43.03, a >27% range within roughly 2 hours, with a 24h decline of 6.25%. This level of volatility poses significant risk to any position.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $418.23K against ~$5.1M in combined 24h volume, a ratio suggesting the pool cannot absorb large trades without significant price impact, elevating slippage and manipulation risk.

  • Concentrationunknown

    Top-10 holders control ~17.48% of supply per a single current snapshot, but no historical trend, top-100 concentration, or wallet classification data is available, so true concentration risk (e.g., whether large wallets are insiders, LPs, or exchanges) cannot be determined.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely thin liquidity ($418K) relative to trading volume (~$5.1M/24h), creating high slippage and price manipulation potential
  • Violent intraday volatility (spike to $56.19 followed by ~22% crash within the same data window)
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out supply inflation or account freezing risk
  • No sniper/early-buyer data available to assess dump risk from initial holders
  • Token branding ('Global X Uranium ETF - Backpack Securities') is unverified, creator-supplied, and could be misleading regarding any real-world backing or affiliation
  • No holder history data available to confirm whether the holder base and concentration are stable, growing, or deteriorating

Mitigating factors

  • A relatively large number of unique buyers (5,322) and sellers (5,153) in 24h suggests broad retail participation rather than a single actor dominating flow
  • Top-10 concentration of ~17.48% is not extreme on its face, though it cannot be fully contextualized without historical or classification data

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced traders who understand thin-liquidity Solana markets and can tolerate rapid, large price swings and potential total loss. It is not appropriate for conservative investors, those seeking exposure to actual uranium/ETF markets (the on-chain token has no verified real-world backing), or anyone unable to withstand high slippage and volatility.

URA presents an extremely high-risk, high-volatility trading opportunity rather than a fundamentally grounded investment. The token's name suggests a link to the Global X Uranium ETF, but no verifiable on-chain or off-chain data confirms any real backing, and critical safety data (mint/freeze authority, contract verification) is entirely unavailable. Recent price action shows a violent spike-and-crash pattern on very thin liquidity, indicating the market is currently dominated by speculative, high-frequency trading rather than stable accumulation.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buy pressure re-emerges and liquidity providers deepen the pool, URA could stage a recovery bounce toward the recent spike zone ($54-56), particularly if retail interest (evidenced by thousands of unique buyers) sustains or grows.

  • Renewed buy-side volume outweighing sell-side (currently 48.6% vs 51.4%)
  • Broad participation base (5,322 unique 24h buyers) could re-ignite momentum
  • Any credible confirmation of real-world backing or utility tied to the 'ETF' branding could attract legitimacy-driven demand

Base Case

URA continues to trade in a highly volatile, range-bound manner around the $40-48 zone in the near term, with large intraday swings driven by its thin liquidity and speculative volume, absent any new catalysts or verified fundamental developments.

  • No new liquidity is added or removed significantly from the pool
  • Buy/sell pressure remains roughly balanced near current levels (~48-51%)
  • No disclosure of mint/freeze authority status changes the risk calculus in the near term
  • Holder base (5,346 addresses) remains roughly stable absent visible catalysts

Bear Case

High probability

The token continues to bleed value as sell pressure persists, thin liquidity amplifies downside moves, and the lack of verifiable authority/security data deters larger buyers, potentially culminating in a sharp liquidity withdrawal or further price collapse.

  • Sell volume already exceeding buy volume in the 24h window
  • Extremely thin $418K liquidity vulnerable to large sell orders causing outsized price impact
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of adverse token actions
  • Recent blow-off top pattern (spike to $56.19 followed by crash) often precedes further downside as momentum traders exit

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 21, 04:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-21 16:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, decimals, supply, FDV)
  • Raydium CLMM price and pair data
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (3 most recent candles)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, transaction counts)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count and top-10 concentration)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles were available, insufficient for robust technical trend analysis
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) was available — only a single current snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration
  • No sniper/early-buyer wallet data was available, precluding dump-risk and PnL assessment
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, contract verification, and mutability status were all unknown, preventing rug-risk assessment from authorities
  • Top-100 holder concentration and wallet classification/labeling data were not provided
  • Token description, name, and branding are creator-supplied and unverified against any real-world entity

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided, much of which contains significant gaps (holder history, sniper data, authority status). Cryptocurrency markets, especially low-liquidity tokens like URA, carry substantial risk of loss, including total loss of capital. Always conduct independent due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Global X Uranium ETF - Backpack Securities ownership?

As of 2026-09-21 16:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 17.48% of supply. It reports 5,346 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Global X Uranium ETF - Backpack Securities?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-21 16:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $2,478,266.00 in buys and $2,619,373.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Global X Uranium ETF - Backpack Securities liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +730.46%, from $146,065.32 (2026-09-21 14:00 UTC) to $1,213,009.50 (2026-09-21 16:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Global X Uranium ETF - Backpack Securities (URA)?

Price fell 6.25% in the last 24h and the most recent hourly candles show a clear reversal from a spike high of $56.19 down to $43.03-$43.94, closing near $43.76. Momentum in the immediate term is negative after the failed breakout, with sell volume (51.4%) modestly outweighing buy volume (48.6%). Watch for further downside toward the $43.03 intraday low or a bounce attempt if buy pressure recovers. Short-term outlook is bearish (1-24 hours), with a target range of $40.00 to $48.00.

Is URA a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 82/100. This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced traders who understand thin-liquidity Solana markets and can tolerate rapid, large price swings and potential total loss. It is not appropriate for conservative investors, those seeking exposure to actual uranium/ETF markets (the on-chain token has no verified real-world backing), or anyone unable to withstand high slippage and volatility.

What are the key risks of holding URA?

Extremely thin liquidity ($418K) relative to trading volume (~$5.1M/24h), creating high slippage and price manipulation potential • Violent intraday volatility (spike to $56.19 followed by ~22% crash within the same data window) • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out supply inflation or account freezing risk

← Back to all predictions

Track URA