CUBEMAN Price Today & AI Analysis

CUBEMANSolanaAnalysis as of Jul 18, 2026

$0.0₄1075

+3.90% 24h

Contract

Live

HVRtNeFPrDcAA9Yu3WrTEdCsTLGJiYDiQbqjg3efpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,149

Market cap

$10,742

At a $1M market cap, $CUBEMAN would be $0.001000 (93.1x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is CUBEMAN a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 16

Re-checking

No red flags last time; the contract test has expired and is due to re-run.

The last contract test has expired and is waiting to re-run. Unhosted’s automated check, re-run in the background: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. Taxes come from a test trade through one pool and can change if the owner changes them.

Ask Unhosted AI about CUBEMAN

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

StocklanaStocklana$0.0₅2992+0.7%MC $3.0K

WIF2WIF2$0.0₅7344-5.3%MC $7.3K

CHARMcharm.fun$0.0₅3668+3.5%MC $3.6K

RAMENRamen Plan$0.0₅2804+3.6%MC $2.7K

BOUGHTI Should Have Bought$0.0₅3852-12.7%MC $3.9K

FTRFlying Tesla Roadster$0.004389+175.3%MC $4.22M

CUBEMAN: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-18 14:17 UTC

Holder addresses

3,082

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$135,980.09

How concentrated is CUBEMAN ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 3,082 addresses (2026-07-18 14:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling CUBEMAN?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is CUBEMAN liquidity falling?: As of 2026-07-18 14:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $135,980.09. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-18 14:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 18, 02:17 PM UTC

FDV

$2,025,854

Liquidity

$135,980.09

Holders

3,082

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

CUBEMAN (CUBEMAN) is a meme/culture token on Solana launched via PumpSwap with a mint address of HVRtNeFPrDcAA9Yu3WrTEdCsTLGJiYDiQbqjg3efpump. The token has experienced a dramatic 98% price surge in the past 24 hours, rising from ~$0.00102 to ~$0.00203, with a fully diluted valuation of ~$2.03M. Holder growth is almost entirely concentrated in the last 2 days (from 81 to 3,082 holders), suggesting a very recent viral/pump event. Top holder data and sniper data are unavailable, limiting concentration analysis. Liquidity is shallow at $135.98K relative to 24h volume of ~$1.43M, creating meaningful slippage risk. The token is unverified, has no social links listed, and the update authority is unknown — all of which elevate risk.

Key points

Explosive 98% 24h price gain with high trading activity (~19,334 buys vs 11,799 sells)
Holder base grew from 81 to 3,082 in just 2 days — nearly all growth is brand new
Shallow liquidity ($135.98K) relative to large 24h volume (~$1.43M) creates high slippage risk
No top holder data available, making concentration risk impossible to quantify directly
Unverified contract, no social links, unknown update authority — elevated rug/manipulation risk
Mutable=false is a mild positive signal for immutability of token metadata

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 1–24 hours

neutral

After a near-doubling in 24h, CUBEMAN is showing strong upward momentum in the most recent candles (candle [1] closed at the high of $0.002026). However, the prior candle [2] printed a large wick to $0.002375 that was rejected, suggesting overhead resistance. With shallow liquidity and a heavily one-sided recent move, a short-term pullback or consolidation is likely before any further extension. The 5m change of +4.79% and 1h change of +21.66% indicate momentum is still live but overextended.

Target low

$0.00155

Target high

$0.00238

Support: $0.00183 (candle [1] open / recent base), $0.00158 (candle [3] close), $0.00131 (candle [12] high / mid-range support)
Resistance: $0.00238 (candle [2] high — rejected wick), $0.00240–$0.00250 (psychological round number zone)

Medium term · 3–14 days

bearish

Given the token's extremely rapid holder acquisition (97% of holders joined in the last 7 days), shallow liquidity, lack of verified contract or social presence, and the typical lifecycle of PumpSwap meme tokens, medium-term price action is likely to be bearish as early buyers take profits and momentum fades. Sustained upside would require genuine community building and liquidity deepening.

Catalysts

Viral social media traction or influencer pickup could extend the pump
Listing on a CEX or aggregator would dramatically increase visibility
Failure to build community or social presence will accelerate sell-off
Any whale exit from the untracked top holders could crash price given thin liquidity

Bullish factors

Strong 24h buy pressure: 50.6% buys vs 49.4% sells with 19,334 buys vs 11,799 sells
Price making higher highs across the last 6 candles (candles [6]→[1])
Rapid holder growth from 81 to 3,082 in 2 days signals viral momentum
Most recent candle closed at its high ($0.002026), indicating no immediate selling pressure
24h unique wallets of 9,845 shows broad participation

Bearish factors

Shallow liquidity ($135.98K) vs ~$1.43M 24h volume — high slippage and exit risk
Candle [2] showed a major wick rejection at $0.002375 — overhead resistance confirmed
Token was completely dormant (81 holders, zero activity) for ~30 days before this pump
No verified contract, no social links, unknown update authority
Top holder distribution data unavailable — concentration risk cannot be ruled out
Meme tokens with this profile frequently dump after initial pump phase

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) missing top holder data preventing concentration analysis, (2) no sniper data, (3) very short price history (token was dormant for ~1 month then exploded in 2 days), and (4) meme token dynamics are inherently unpredictable. The 24h candle data provides some technical grounding but the overall data set is incomplete.

CUBEMAN call history

Full track record →

Jul 18neutral@ $0.00203

24h—

7d—

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: HVRtNe...pump
Total Supply: 999,994,167.63

Key Risks

Unknown top holder concentration — original 81 holders could dump at any time
Shallow liquidity ($135.98K) makes large exits extremely costly and can trigger cascading sells
Token was dormant for 28+ days — suggests coordinated pump rather than organic growth
No verified contract, no social links, no team transparency

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 24-hour OHLC series (hourly) shows a clear two-phase structure. Phase 1 (candles [24]–[15], ~15:00–00:00 UTC Jul 17–18): price traded in a relatively tight range of $0.000965–$0.001395, with mixed candles and no clear directional bias — essentially sideways/consolidation. Phase 2 (candles [14]–[1], 01:00–14:00 UTC Jul 18): a sustained breakout with consistent higher highs and higher lows. Candle [14] opened at $0.001054 and closed at $0.001179. By candle [1], price reached $0.002026 — a ~72% gain from the Phase 2 breakout point. The most recent candle [1] closed exactly at its high, a bullish sign. Candle [2] printed a large upper wick (H: $0.002375, C: $0.001883), indicating a failed attempt to push higher and profit-taking at the top.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Short-term trend is clearly bullish with a series of higher highs and higher lows from candle [14] onward. The medium-term trend is also technically uptrend given the 24h window, though the token was dormant for 30 days prior, making 'medium-term' context very limited. The candle [2] wick rejection is the first sign of potential exhaustion.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00183 (candle [1] open, recent breakout base)

Major support

$0.00113 (candle [13] close / mid-range consolidation zone)

Immediate resistance

$0.00238 (candle [2] high — wick rejection level)

Major resistance

$0.00250 (psychological round number above recent wick high)

The most critical support is the $0.00183 level (candle [1] open), which if broken would suggest the current leg is failing. Deeper support sits at $0.00131–$0.00135 (candles [8]–[12] range). On the upside, the $0.00238 wick high from candle [2] is the key resistance — a clean break and close above this level would signal continuation. The $0.00113 zone represents the pre-breakout consolidation base.

Notable patterns

Higher highs and higher lows from candle [14] through candle [1] — sustained uptrend structure
Candle [2]: large upper wick with close well below high ($0.002375 H vs $0.001883 C) — shooting star / bearish wick rejection at local top
Candle [1]: closes exactly at its high ($0.002026) — bullish momentum candle, but on declining volume
Volume climax at candle [4] ($144,970) followed by progressive volume decline — potential exhaustion signal
Candles [9]–[11]: very tight range (doji-like) suggesting brief consolidation before the final push higher
Phase 1 (candles [15]–[24]): sideways chop with multiple wicks in both directions — no directional conviction

Liquidity

$135,980.09

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $135.98K against a 24h trading volume of approximately $1.43M — a volume-to-liquidity ratio of ~10.5x. This means the pool is being turned over more than 10 times per day, creating extreme slippage risk for any meaningful position size. A trader attempting to exit even a $10K–$20K position would face significant price impact. The net flow is marginally positive (inflow) with buy volume ($721.8K) slightly exceeding sell volume ($705.0K) by ~$16.8K, representing only a 1.2% net inflow — essentially balanced. The buyer count (8,989) significantly exceeds seller count (6,431), but average sell size (~$109.5) is larger than average buy size (~$80.3), suggesting larger holders are selling into smaller retail buys. The PumpSwap pair (4z3ZkJiksBXGr7PVkfSJBuK2GmkHmTTfaGHmGWPAgo8D) is the sole liquidity venue, with no CEX or alternative DEX liquidity noted.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,994,167.63

FDV

$2,025,853.53

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
98% price gain in 24 hours with the token dormant for 28+ days prior. Extreme volatility is inherent. The token can lose 50%+ of its value in hours given thin liquidity and meme-driven price action.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of $135.98K against $1.43M 24h volume (10.5x turnover ratio). Any position above ~$5K–$10K faces severe slippage. Single liquidity venue (PumpSwap) with no CEX backup.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Unknown top holder concentration — original 81 holders could dump at any time
Shallow liquidity ($135.98K) makes large exits extremely costly and can trigger cascading sells
Token was dormant for 28+ days — suggests coordinated pump rather than organic growth
No verified contract, no social links, no team transparency
Mint and freeze authority status unconfirmed — potential rug vector
Volume declining on new price highs (candle [1] volume $17K vs candle [4] $145K) — exhaustion signal
Meme token with no utility — value entirely dependent on sentiment and momentum

Mitigating factors

Mutable=false reduces metadata manipulation risk
PumpFun-suffix mint address suggests standard bonding curve launch with likely burned mint authority (unconfirmed)
Near-balanced buy/sell volumes suggest market is not in immediate one-sided dump
Broad participation: 9,845 unique wallets in 24h reduces single-point-of-failure risk somewhat
Most recent candle closed at its high, indicating no immediate sell pressure at time of analysis

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who understand meme token dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, use strict position sizing (no more than 0.5–1% of portfolio), and have a clear exit strategy. Absolutely not suitable for conservative investors, long-term holders, or anyone unfamiliar with Solana meme token risks.

CUBEMAN is a high-risk, high-volatility meme token on Solana that has experienced a dramatic pump from dormancy. The investment case is purely momentum/sentiment-driven with no fundamental utility. The bull case requires sustained viral momentum; the bear case (which is more probable given the data) involves a rapid reversal as early holders exit into thin liquidity.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

CUBEMAN catches viral social media traction, attracts influencer attention, and the meme narrative resonates broadly enough to sustain buying pressure. Liquidity deepens as the token gains visibility, and the holder base continues to grow organically. Price could extend toward the $0.004–$0.006 range (2–3x from current levels) if momentum sustains.

Viral social media / influencer pickup
Continued holder growth acceleration beyond current 3,082
Liquidity pool deepening to reduce slippage
Broader Solana meme season tailwinds
Community formation around the retro gaming / internet culture narrative

Base Case

CUBEMAN consolidates in the $0.0013–$0.0020 range over the next 48–72 hours as early momentum fades but some community interest persists. Price gradually drifts lower toward $0.0010–$0.0013 over 1–2 weeks as the initial pump cohort exits and no new catalysts emerge.

No major new catalysts (influencer, CEX listing) emerge
Early holders gradually distribute rather than dump all at once
Liquidity remains thin, limiting both upside and downside velocity
Holder count stabilizes or grows slowly without viral acceleration

Bear Case

High probability

Early holders (original 81 pre-pump wallets) begin distributing into retail buying pressure. Volume continues to decline on new highs (as seen in candle data), momentum fades, and the token retraces 60–80% of its gains. Given the 28-day dormancy and sudden pump, this is the historically most common outcome for similar tokens.

Original 81 holders sitting on 10–100x gains with strong incentive to sell
Declining volume on price highs — classic distribution pattern
Shallow liquidity amplifies downside moves
No verified contract, no social presence, no utility to anchor value
Meme token lifecycle: pump → distribution → dump

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 18, 02:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-18 14:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (Mint: HVRtNeFPrDcAA9Yu3WrTEdCsTLGJiYDiQbqjg3efpump)
PumpSwap pair price feed (pair: 4z3ZkJiksBXGr7PVkfSJBuK2GmkHmTTfaGHmGWPAgo8D)
Hourly OHLC candle data (24 candles)
Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
Holder metrics and historical holder time series (30 days daily)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Top 20 holder data unavailable — concentration risk cannot be quantified
Sniper data unavailable — early buyer PnL and sell-through rate unknown
Update authority status unknown — mint/freeze authority cannot be confirmed
No social links or external community data to assess sentiment beyond on-chain metrics
Token has only 2 days of meaningful price history, limiting technical analysis depth
Supply distribution breakdown (whales/sharks/dolphins/fish/octopus) all show 0 — data gap
Top10/Top100 concentration shown as 0% — likely a data gap, not genuine zero concentration

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Meme tokens carry extreme risk of total loss. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analyst has no position in CUBEMAN.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is CUBEMAN a scam?

No red flags last time; the contract test has expired and is due to re-run. Checked Oct 16, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

How concentrated is CUBEMAN ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 3,082 addresses (2026-07-18 14:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling CUBEMAN?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is CUBEMAN liquidity falling?

As of 2026-07-18 14:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $135,980.09. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for CUBEMAN (CUBEMAN)?

Is CUBEMAN a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 8.5/100. Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who understand meme token dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, use strict position sizing (no more than 0.5–1% of portfolio), and have a clear exit strategy. Absolutely not suitable for conservative investors, long-term holders, or anyone unfamiliar with Solana meme token risks.

What are the key risks of holding CUBEMAN?

Unknown top holder concentration — original 81 holders could dump at any time • Shallow liquidity ($135.98K) makes large exits extremely costly and can trigger cascading sells • Token was dormant for 28+ days — suggests coordinated pump rather than organic growth