CUBEMAN

CUBEMAN Price Today & AI Analysis

CUBEMAN
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 18, 2026

HVRtNeFPrDcAA9Yu3WrTEdCsTLGJiYDiQbqjg3efpump

$0.041243

-39.42%

FDV $12,428

LiveContract:HVRtNeFPrDcAA9Yu3WrTEdCsTLGJiYDiQbqjg3efpumpChain:SolanaHolders:941Market cap:$12,428

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about CUBEMAN

Report snapshotas of Jul 18, 02:17 PM
FDV

$2,025,854

Liquidity

$135,980

Holders

3,082

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

CUBEMAN (CUBEMAN) is a meme/culture token on Solana launched via PumpSwap with a mint address of HVRtNeFPrDcAA9Yu3WrTEdCsTLGJiYDiQbqjg3efpump. The token has experienced a dramatic 98% price surge in the past 24 hours, rising from ~$0.00102 to ~$0.00203, with a fully diluted valuation of ~$2.03M. Holder growth is almost entirely concentrated in the last 2 days (from 81 to 3,082 holders), suggesting a very recent viral/pump event. Top holder data and sniper data are unavailable, limiting concentration analysis. Liquidity is shallow at $135.98K relative to 24h volume of ~$1.43M, creating meaningful slippage risk. The token is unverified, has no social links listed, and the update authority is unknown — all of which elevate risk.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Neutral
Explosive 98% 24h price gain with high trading activity (~19,334 buys vs 11,799 sells)
Holder base grew from 81 to 3,082 in just 2 days — nearly all growth is brand new
Shallow liquidity ($135.98K) relative to large 24h volume (~$1.43M) creates high slippage risk
No top holder data available, making concentration risk impossible to quantify directly
Unverified contract, no social links, unknown update authority — elevated rug/manipulation risk
Mutable=false is a mild positive signal for immutability of token metadata

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term

neutral
1–24 hours

After a near-doubling in 24h, CUBEMAN is showing strong upward momentum in the most recent candles (candle [1] closed at the high of $0.002026). However, the prior candle [2] printed a large wick to $0.002375 that was rejected, suggesting overhead resistance. With shallow liquidity and a heavily one-sided recent move, a short-term pullback or consolidation is likely before any further extension. The 5m change of +4.79% and 1h change of +21.66% indicate momentum is still live but overextended.

Target low$0.00155
Target high$0.00238
Support: $0.00183 (candle [1] open / recent base), $0.00158 (candle [3] close), $0.00131 (candle [12] high / mid-range support)
Resistance: $0.00238 (candle [2] high — rejected wick), $0.00240–$0.00250 (psychological round number zone)

Medium term

bearish
3–14 days

Given the token's extremely rapid holder acquisition (97% of holders joined in the last 7 days), shallow liquidity, lack of verified contract or social presence, and the typical lifecycle of PumpSwap meme tokens, medium-term price action is likely to be bearish as early buyers take profits and momentum fades. Sustained upside would require genuine community building and liquidity deepening.

Catalysts
  • Viral social media traction or influencer pickup could extend the pump
  • Listing on a CEX or aggregator would dramatically increase visibility
  • Failure to build community or social presence will accelerate sell-off
  • Any whale exit from the untracked top holders could crash price given thin liquidity

Bullish factors

  • Strong 24h buy pressure: 50.6% buys vs 49.4% sells with 19,334 buys vs 11,799 sells
  • Price making higher highs across the last 6 candles (candles [6]→[1])
  • Rapid holder growth from 81 to 3,082 in 2 days signals viral momentum
  • Most recent candle closed at its high ($0.002026), indicating no immediate selling pressure
  • 24h unique wallets of 9,845 shows broad participation

Bearish factors

  • Shallow liquidity ($135.98K) vs ~$1.43M 24h volume — high slippage and exit risk
  • Candle [2] showed a major wick rejection at $0.002375 — overhead resistance confirmed
  • Token was completely dormant (81 holders, zero activity) for ~30 days before this pump
  • No verified contract, no social links, unknown update authority
  • Top holder distribution data unavailable — concentration risk cannot be ruled out
  • Meme tokens with this profile frequently dump after initial pump phase
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) missing top holder data preventing concentration analysis, (2) no sniper data, (3) very short price history (token was dormant for ~1 month then exploded in 2 days), and (4) meme token dynamics are inherently unpredictable. The 24h candle data provides some technical grounding but the overall data set is incomplete.

CUBEMAN call history

Full track record →
Jul 18neutral
24h
7d
30d

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

The 24-hour OHLC series (hourly) shows a clear two-phase structure. Phase 1 (candles [24]–[15], ~15:00–00:00 UTC Jul 17–18): price traded in a relatively tight range of $0.000965–$0.001395, with mixed candles and no clear directional bias — essentially sideways/consolidation. Phase 2 (candles [14]–[1], 01:00–14:00 UTC Jul 18): a sustained breakout with consistent higher highs and higher lows. Candle [14] opened at $0.001054 and closed at $0.001179. By candle [1], price reached $0.002026 — a ~72% gain from the Phase 2 breakout point. The most recent candle [1] closed exactly at its high, a bullish sign. Candle [2] printed a large upper wick (H: $0.002375, C: $0.001883), indicating a failed attempt to push higher and profit-taking at the top.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
uptrend

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 51%Sell 49%

Short-term trend is clearly bullish with a series of higher highs and higher lows from candle [14] onward. The medium-term trend is also technically uptrend given the 24h window, though the token was dormant for 30 days prior, making 'medium-term' context very limited. The candle [2] wick rejection is the first sign of potential exhaustion.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.00183 (candle [1] open, recent breakout base)
Major$0.00113 (candle [13] close / mid-range consolidation zone)
Resistance
Immediate$0.00238 (candle [2] high — wick rejection level)
Major$0.00250 (psychological round number above recent wick high)

The most critical support is the $0.00183 level (candle [1] open), which if broken would suggest the current leg is failing. Deeper support sits at $0.00131–$0.00135 (candles [8]–[12] range). On the upside, the $0.00238 wick high from candle [2] is the key resistance — a clean break and close above this level would signal continuation. The $0.00113 zone represents the pre-breakout consolidation base.

Notable patterns

  • Higher highs and higher lows from candle [14] through candle [1] — sustained uptrend structure
  • Candle [2]: large upper wick with close well below high ($0.002375 H vs $0.001883 C) — shooting star / bearish wick rejection at local top
  • Candle [1]: closes exactly at its high ($0.002026) — bullish momentum candle, but on declining volume
  • Volume climax at candle [4] ($144,970) followed by progressive volume decline — potential exhaustion signal
  • Candles [9]–[11]: very tight range (doji-like) suggesting brief consolidation before the final push higher
  • Phase 1 (candles [15]–[24]): sideways chop with multiple wicks in both directions — no directional conviction

Total holders3,082
24h Δ+21
7d Δ+97
30d Δ+97
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Holder growth is strongly correlated with the price pump. The historical data shows the token sat at exactly 81 holders from June 18 through July 15 (28 days of zero growth). On July 16, holders exploded from 81 to 2,423 (+2,342, +97%) in a single day — coinciding with the price breakout. By July 17, holders reached 2,413 (a slight -10 net decline, possibly wallet consolidation or data artifact). As of the analysis timestamp, holders stand at 3,082 — a further +669 in roughly 18 hours. The price surge and holder surge are clearly simultaneous, suggesting the holder growth is driven by the price action (FOMO buying) rather than organic community building preceding the price move.

The holder growth pattern is highly anomalous. 97% of all holders joined in the last 7 days (and effectively in the last 2 days), with the token completely dormant for the prior 28+ days at just 81 holders. This is a classic pump pattern where a token with a small pre-existing holder base (81 wallets) suddenly attracts mass retail attention. The acceleration is extreme — from 0 new holders/day for 28 days to +2,342 in a single day. While the raw growth numbers are impressive, the context (dormancy followed by sudden explosion) raises questions about whether this is organic or coordinated. The slight -10 holder decline on July 17 amid rising prices may indicate some early buyers exiting. Current 24h growth of +662 holders (+21%) shows momentum is still building but at a slower rate than the initial explosion.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available

0.00%

Top holder data is unavailable for CUBEMAN — the data source returned no top 20 holders. The supply concentration metrics show top10=0% and top100=0%, which likely reflects a data gap rather than genuinely zero concentration. With 3,082 total holders and a total supply of ~999.99M tokens, concentration analysis cannot be performed. This is a significant analytical limitation. Given the token's PumpSwap origin and the 81-wallet pre-pump holder base, it is reasonable to assume that some of those original 81 wallets hold disproportionately large positions and represent meaningful concentration risk — but this cannot be confirmed without the data. Investors should treat the unknown concentration as a high-risk factor. Sentiment is marked 'mixed' as the near-balanced buy/sell volumes suggest some holders are distributing while others accumulate.

Liquidity$135,980
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$721,800
Sell$704,960
Net flow
inflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers8,989
Unique sellers6,431

Liquidity is critically shallow at $135.98K against a 24h trading volume of approximately $1.43M — a volume-to-liquidity ratio of ~10.5x. This means the pool is being turned over more than 10 times per day, creating extreme slippage risk for any meaningful position size. A trader attempting to exit even a $10K–$20K position would face significant price impact. The net flow is marginally positive (inflow) with buy volume ($721.8K) slightly exceeding sell volume ($705.0K) by ~$16.8K, representing only a 1.2% net inflow — essentially balanced. The buyer count (8,989) significantly exceeds seller count (6,431), but average sell size (~$109.5) is larger than average buy size (~$80.3), suggesting larger holders are selling into smaller retail buys. The PumpSwap pair (4z3ZkJiksBXGr7PVkfSJBuK2GmkHmTTfaGHmGWPAgo8D) is the sole liquidity venue, with no CEX or alternative DEX liquidity noted.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,994,167.63
FDV$2,025,853.53

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is ~999.99M tokens (effectively 1 billion), a standard round supply for PumpFun/PumpSwap launches. The FDV is ~$2.03M at current prices. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, preventing a definitive assessment of mint and freeze authority status. The token is marked as 'Mutable: false', which is a positive signal suggesting token metadata cannot be changed — however, this does not directly confirm mint or freeze authority renouncement. The token is not verified and has no social links. The 'pump' suffix in the mint address (HVRtNeFPrDcAA9Yu3WrTEdCsTLGJiYDiQbqjg3efpump) is consistent with a PumpFun launch, where mint authority is typically burned upon bonding curve graduation. However, without explicit on-chain confirmation, authority status remains unknown. Investors should verify mint and freeze authority status independently before committing capital.

Volatility
high

98% price gain in 24 hours with the token dormant for 28+ days prior. Extreme volatility is inherent. The token can lose 50%+ of its value in hours given thin liquidity and meme-driven price action.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of $135.98K against $1.43M 24h volume (10.5x turnover ratio). Any position above ~$5K–$10K faces severe slippage. Single liquidity venue (PumpSwap) with no CEX backup.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is unavailable. The original 81 pre-pump holders are sitting on massive unrealized gains and represent unknown but potentially extreme concentration risk. Cannot be quantified but must be assumed high.

SniperDump
medium

No sniper data available. The 'pump' suffix suggests PumpFun origin where snipers are common. However, without data, risk is assessed as medium rather than high. The 28-day dormancy period may have discouraged bot sniping at launch.

Authority
medium

Update authority is 'unknown'. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. Mutable=false is a positive signal but insufficient to fully mitigate authority risk. Independent verification required.

Key risks

  • Unknown top holder concentration — original 81 holders could dump at any time
  • Shallow liquidity ($135.98K) makes large exits extremely costly and can trigger cascading sells
  • Token was dormant for 28+ days — suggests coordinated pump rather than organic growth
  • No verified contract, no social links, no team transparency
  • Mint and freeze authority status unconfirmed — potential rug vector
  • Volume declining on new price highs (candle [1] volume $17K vs candle [4] $145K) — exhaustion signal
  • Meme token with no utility — value entirely dependent on sentiment and momentum

Mitigating factors

  • Mutable=false reduces metadata manipulation risk
  • PumpFun-suffix mint address suggests standard bonding curve launch with likely burned mint authority (unconfirmed)
  • Near-balanced buy/sell volumes suggest market is not in immediate one-sided dump
  • Broad participation: 9,845 unique wallets in 24h reduces single-point-of-failure risk somewhat
  • Most recent candle closed at its high, indicating no immediate sell pressure at time of analysis
Suitable for: Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who understand meme token dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, use strict position sizing (no more than 0.5–1% of portfolio), and have a clear exit strategy. Absolutely not suitable for conservative investors, long-term holders, or anyone unfamiliar with Solana meme token risks.

CUBEMAN is a high-risk, high-volatility meme token on Solana that has experienced a dramatic pump from dormancy. The investment case is purely momentum/sentiment-driven with no fundamental utility. The bull case requires sustained viral momentum; the bear case (which is more probable given the data) involves a rapid reversal as early holders exit into thin liquidity.

Bull case (low)

CUBEMAN catches viral social media traction, attracts influencer attention, and the meme narrative resonates broadly enough to sustain buying pressure. Liquidity deepens as the token gains visibility, and the holder base continues to grow organically. Price could extend toward the $0.004–$0.006 range (2–3x from current levels) if momentum sustains.

  • Viral social media / influencer pickup
  • Continued holder growth acceleration beyond current 3,082
  • Liquidity pool deepening to reduce slippage
  • Broader Solana meme season tailwinds
  • Community formation around the retro gaming / internet culture narrative

Base case

CUBEMAN consolidates in the $0.0013–$0.0020 range over the next 48–72 hours as early momentum fades but some community interest persists. Price gradually drifts lower toward $0.0010–$0.0013 over 1–2 weeks as the initial pump cohort exits and no new catalysts emerge.

  • No major new catalysts (influencer, CEX listing) emerge
  • Early holders gradually distribute rather than dump all at once
  • Liquidity remains thin, limiting both upside and downside velocity
  • Holder count stabilizes or grows slowly without viral acceleration

Bear case (high)

Early holders (original 81 pre-pump wallets) begin distributing into retail buying pressure. Volume continues to decline on new highs (as seen in candle data), momentum fades, and the token retraces 60–80% of its gains. Given the 28-day dormancy and sudden pump, this is the historically most common outcome for similar tokens.

  • Original 81 holders sitting on 10–100x gains with strong incentive to sell
  • Declining volume on price highs — classic distribution pattern
  • Shallow liquidity amplifies downside moves
  • No verified contract, no social presence, no utility to anchor value
  • Meme token lifecycle: pump → distribution → dump

GeneratedJul 18, 02:17 PM
Data freshnessPrice and candle data current as of candle [1] close (2026-07-18T14:00 UTC). Holder data reflects most recent snapshot at 3,082 holders. Sniper data unavailable.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (Mint: HVRtNeFPrDcAA9Yu3WrTEdCsTLGJiYDiQbqjg3efpump)
  • PumpSwap pair price feed (pair: 4z3ZkJiksBXGr7PVkfSJBuK2GmkHmTTfaGHmGWPAgo8D)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (24 candles)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder time series (30 days daily)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Top 20 holder data unavailable — concentration risk cannot be quantified
  • Sniper data unavailable — early buyer PnL and sell-through rate unknown
  • Update authority status unknown — mint/freeze authority cannot be confirmed
  • No social links or external community data to assess sentiment beyond on-chain metrics
  • Token has only 2 days of meaningful price history, limiting technical analysis depth
  • Supply distribution breakdown (whales/sharks/dolphins/fish/octopus) all show 0 — data gap
  • Top10/Top100 concentration shown as 0% — likely a data gap, not genuine zero concentration

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Meme tokens carry extreme risk of total loss. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analyst has no position in CUBEMAN.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,994,167.63

Key Risks

Unknown top holder concentration — original 81 holders could dump at any time
Shallow liquidity ($135.98K) makes large exits extremely costly and can trigger cascading sells
Token was dormant for 28+ days — suggests coordinated pump rather than organic growth
No verified contract, no social links, no team transparency

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for CUBEMAN. As per methodology, sniperConcentrationPercent is set to 0 and related fields are marked unknown. Smart money signals must therefore be inferred from broader trading analytics. The 24h data shows 19,334 buys vs 11,799 sells across 8,989 buyers and 6,431 sellers — buy count significantly exceeds sell count, but the dollar volumes are nearly balanced ($721.8K buys vs $705.0K sells), suggesting that while more wallets are buying, sellers are moving larger average positions. This pattern is consistent with early holders distributing into retail buying pressure.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available — endpoint returned no results.

Unknown — no sniper or early buyer PnL data available. However, the token was dormant at 81 holders for ~30 days before the pump, suggesting the original 81 holders are sitting on very large unrealized gains and represent a significant latent sell pressure. Their behavior is the key unknown risk factor.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for CUBEMAN (CUBEMAN)?

After a near-doubling in 24h, CUBEMAN is showing strong upward momentum in the most recent candles (candle [1] closed at the high of $0.002026). However, the prior candle [2] printed a large wick to $0.002375 that was rejected, suggesting overhead resistance. With shallow liquidity and a heavily one-sided recent move, a short-term pullback or consolidation is likely before any further extension. The 5m change of +4.79% and 1h change of +21.66% indicate momentum is still live but overextended. Short-term outlook is neutral (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.00155 to $0.00238.

Is CUBEMAN a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 8.5/100. Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who understand meme token dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, use strict position sizing (no more than 0.5–1% of portfolio), and have a clear exit strategy. Absolutely not suitable for conservative investors, long-term holders, or anyone unfamiliar with Solana meme token risks.

How are CUBEMAN holders trending?

CUBEMAN currently has 3,082 holders and is growing (24h: 21, 7d: 97, 30d: 97). The holder growth pattern is highly anomalous. 97% of all holders joined in the last 7 days (and effectively in the last 2 days), with the token completely dormant for the prior 28+ days at just 81 holders. This is a classic pump pattern where a token with a small pre-existing holder base (81 wallets) suddenly attracts mass retail attention. The acceleration is extreme — from 0 new holders/day for 28 days to +2,342 in a single day. While the raw growth numbers are impressive, the context (dormancy followed by sudden explosion) raises questions about whether this is organic or coordinated. The slight -10 holder decline on July 17 amid rising prices may indicate some early buyers exiting. Current 24h growth of +662 holders (+21%) shows momentum is still building but at a slower rate than the initial explosion.

What does sniper activity look like for CUBEMAN?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding CUBEMAN?

Unknown top holder concentration — original 81 holders could dump at any time • Shallow liquidity ($135.98K) makes large exits extremely costly and can trigger cascading sells • Token was dormant for 28+ days — suggests coordinated pump rather than organic growth

Track CUBEMAN