How concentrated is WIF2 ownership?

The top-10 share isn't in this report; it counted 5,089 holder addresses (2026-06-29 05:19 UTC).

Are large holders selling WIF2?

Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.

Is WIF2 liquidity falling?

This report saved one reading, $69,070.50 (2026-06-29 05:19 UTC), and one reading can't show a trend.

WIF2 Price Today & AI Analysis

WIF2SolanaAnalysis as of Jun 29, 2026

$0.0₅6249

-1.32% 24h

Contract

Live

HRJLkc6vDysVHdrUpCsQ5EBx6fPM15TZRKAhfUBnpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

3,711

Market cap

$6,243

At a $1M market cap, $WIF2 would be $0.001001 (160x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is WIF2 a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 10

Watch insiders

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, but wallets from the launch still hold 25% of the supply.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

25%1 sniper, 47 insiders still holding

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about WIF2

3 free answers a day

WIF2: holders, selling & liquidity

Saved with the report, 2026-06-29 05:19 UTC

Holder addresses

5,089

Top 10 supply share

Not in this report

Reported liquidity

$69,070.50

How concentrated is WIF2 ownership?: The top-10 share isn't in this report; it counted 5,089 holder addresses (2026-06-29 05:19 UTC).
Are large holders selling WIF2?: Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.
Is WIF2 liquidity falling?: This report saved one reading, $69,070.50 (2026-06-29 05:19 UTC), and one reading can't show a trend.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-29 05:19 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jun 29, 05:19 AM UTC

FDV

$486,266

Liquidity

$69,070.50

Holders

5,089

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

WIF2 (HRJLkc6vDysVHdrUpCsQ5EBx6fPM15TZRKAhfUBnpump) is a PumpFun-launched meme token on Solana, presenting itself as a sequel to the original dogwifhat (WIF) coin. The token launched with ~80 holders for nearly a month before an explosive single-day surge to 5,084 holders (+5,004 in one day, +98%) on June 28, 2026, accompanied by a 1,126% price spike. Current price is ~$0.000486, FDV ~$486K, with $69K in liquidity. Sell pressure is dominant at 73.6% of 24h volume ($302K sells vs $108K buys). The OHLC data shows highly anomalous candle structure. Top holder data is unavailable, and no sniper data exists. The description claims '25% supply to Ansem' — this is an unverified, potentially manipulative claim by the token creator and should be treated with extreme skepticism.

Key points

Explosive single-day holder growth: +5,004 holders (+98%) on June 28, 2026, after 30 days of complete stagnation at 80 holders
1,126% 24h price surge with dominant sell pressure (73.6% sell volume, $302K vs $108K buys)
Anomalous OHLC candle structure: Open/High/Close values appear inverted across all 22 candles, suggesting data artifact or extreme price manipulation
Unverified claim of '25% supply to Ansem' in token description — a classic meme token marketing tactic that cannot be confirmed from on-chain data
No top holder data available, zero supply concentration metrics reported — critical transparency gap

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–72 hours

bearish

Target low

$0.000034 (recent OHLC close floor)

Target high

$0.000650 (if renewed buying momentum emerges)

Support: $0.000034 (recurring OHLC close level across 22 candles), $0.000039 (recurring OHLC open/high level)
Resistance: $0.000486 (current price / 24h high zone), $0.000650 (psychological extension target)

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

bearish

The token spent 30 days dormant at 80 holders before a single-day viral event. Without sustained community development, exchange listings, or genuine utility, the pattern is consistent with a pump-and-dump cycle. Medium-term outlook is bearish unless new catalysts emerge.

Catalysts

Genuine Ansem endorsement or on-chain proof of supply allocation (currently unverified)
Broader Solana meme season continuation
Viral social media momentum sustaining new buyer inflow
Liquidity deepening above $500K to reduce slippage risk

Bullish factors

1,126% price appreciation in 24h demonstrates strong speculative demand
+5,004 new holders in a single day shows viral spread potential
1h price change of +67% suggests momentum is still active in the short term
6h price change of +169.7% confirms strong recent upward move
Meme token narrative (WIF sequel) has proven viral appeal in Solana ecosystem

Bearish factors

73.6% sell pressure ($302K sells vs $108K buys) — sellers dominate heavily
Only $69K total liquidity against $486K FDV creates extreme slippage risk
Token was dormant for 30 days at 80 holders before the pump — no organic growth
No top holder data available — cannot assess concentration or dump risk
Unverified claims about Ansem allocation are a common manipulation tactic
5-minute price change already turning negative (-0.26%) suggesting peak may be in
Contract not verified; update authority unknown; mutable=false but other metadata unclear

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) anomalous OHLC data structure making technical analysis unreliable, (2) no top holder data available, (3) no sniper data, (4) zero supply concentration metrics, and (5) the token's behavior is consistent with a coordinated pump event rather than organic growth.

WIF2 call history

Full track record →

Jun 29bearish@ $0.000486

24h+1.2%

7d-93.8%

30d-98.2%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: HRJLkc...pump
Total Supply: 999,876,262.38

Key Risks

No top holder data — impossible to assess true concentration or identify insider wallets
Unverified claim of 25% supply to Ansem — potential manipulation tactic to attract buyers
Token dormant for 30 days at 80 holders before single-day pump — classic coordinated pump pattern
73.6% sell pressure with 1,798 sellers vs 653 buyers — active distribution phase

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 22 hourly OHLC candles (June 28–29, 2026) display a highly anomalous structure: in nearly every candle, the Low value is HIGHER than both the Open and Close, which is mathematically impossible in standard OHLC notation. For example, candle [1] shows O:0.0000391, H:0.0000391, L:0.000367, C:0.0000341 — the 'Low' of 0.000367 is far above the Open and Close. This suggests either a data feed error (Low/High fields may be swapped or represent something else entirely) or extreme intra-candle volatility with the price spiking to those levels and collapsing. Taking the anomalous 'L' values as actual intra-candle highs, the token reached peaks ranging from ~$0.000082 (candle 18) to ~$0.000367 (candle 1), showing an upward trend in intra-candle spikes over the 22-hour period. The consistent O/C oscillation between ~$0.0000341 and ~$0.0000391 across all candles suggests a very tight base range before the current price of $0.000486 (which is far above all candle values, consistent with the 1,126% 24h move occurring after these candles).

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Short and medium term are technically in uptrend given the 1,126% 24h price surge. However, the trend is driven by a single explosive event rather than sustained accumulation, and sell pressure is dominant. The candle data predates the main pump, showing a tight consolidation range of $0.0000341–$0.0000391 before the breakout.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

26%

Sell

74%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000039 (recurring OHLC open/high base across all 22 candles)

Major support

$0.000034 (recurring OHLC close floor — the lowest consistent price level in candle data)

Immediate resistance

$0.000486 (current price — represents the post-pump level, far above candle range)

Major resistance

$0.000650 (psychological extension; no prior price history at this level)

The candle data shows a tight consolidation between $0.0000341 and $0.0000391 for the entire 22-hour window captured, with anomalous intra-candle spikes. The current price of $0.000486 is approximately 12x above the candle range, meaning there is virtually no technical support between $0.000039 and $0.000486 — a massive air gap that represents extreme downside risk if selling accelerates.

Notable patterns

Anomalous OHLC structure: 'Low' values consistently exceed Open/High/Close — possible data feed inversion or extreme wick behavior
Tight open/close oscillation ($0.0000341–$0.0000391) across all 22 candles suggests pre-pump consolidation or bot-driven price stabilization
Volume spike in candle [2] ($114K) followed by sharp decline — classic pump volume exhaustion pattern
Current price ($0.000486) is ~12x above the entire 22-candle range — massive gap with no support structure
Consistent alternating open/close pattern across all candles may indicate automated market-making or wash trading activity

Liquidity

$69,070.50

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $69K against a $486K FDV — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of only ~14.2%. This means any moderately sized sell order will cause severe slippage. The 24h trading volume of ~$410K is nearly 6x the total liquidity, indicating extremely high turnover relative to pool depth. Net flow is strongly negative: $302K in sells vs $108K in buys, a 2.79:1 sell-to-buy ratio. Unique sellers (1,798) outnumber unique buyers (653) by 2.75:1. The token trades on PumpSwap (pair GJA8ec4mGb79zP3cNiz92VDoZP4KHCSQPJ1xKNKaBHW1), which is consistent with a PumpFun-launched token. Market health is poor: shallow liquidity, dominant sell pressure, and a price that has already pumped 1,126% — all classic signs of a distribution phase following a coordinated pump.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,876,262.38

FDV

$486,265.68

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
1,126% 24h price surge followed by dominant sell pressure (73.6%) and only $69K liquidity. Extreme volatility with massive downside gap — current price ($0.000486) is ~12x above the pre-pump candle range ($0.000034–$0.000039), meaning a full retracement would represent a ~92% loss.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of $69K against $486K FDV (14.2% ratio) and $410K 24h volume. Any sell order above a few thousand dollars will experience severe slippage. Pool is on PumpSwap with no evidence of additional liquidity sources.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

No top holder data — impossible to assess true concentration or identify insider wallets
Unverified claim of 25% supply to Ansem — potential manipulation tactic to attract buyers
Token dormant for 30 days at 80 holders before single-day pump — classic coordinated pump pattern
73.6% sell pressure with 1,798 sellers vs 653 buyers — active distribution phase
Only $69K liquidity — extreme slippage risk on any meaningful sell order
Current price ~12x above pre-pump candle range with no technical support in between
Contract not verified; update authority unknown
4,430 of 5,089 holders acquired via transfer — unusual ratio suggesting possible wallet seeding
24h price change reported as 0% in analytics despite 1,126% change in price data — data inconsistency raises questions

Mitigating factors

Mutable=false reduces metadata manipulation risk
PumpFun launch provides some standardization and transparency
Genuine viral meme potential — WIF was a multi-billion dollar token; sequel narrative has proven appeal
5,089 holders in 24h shows real market interest and distribution breadth
Token is listed as 'possible spam: false' by the data provider

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep experience in high-risk meme token trading. The combination of a post-pump entry point, dominant sell pressure, shallow liquidity, missing holder data, and unverifiable supply allocation claims makes this an extremely high-risk asset.

WIF2 is a high-risk meme token that has already executed its primary pump (+1,126% in 24h). The investment thesis is almost entirely speculative, relying on continued viral momentum in the Solana meme ecosystem. The token exhibits multiple red flags consistent with a coordinated pump-and-dump: 30 days of dormancy at 80 holders, single-day explosive growth, dominant sell pressure, shallow liquidity, and unverifiable supply allocation claims. Any investment at current prices is a bet on finding a greater fool before the original 80 holders complete their distribution.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

WIF2 achieves genuine viral status as a Solana meme token sequel, attracts influencer attention (including possible genuine Ansem involvement), and rides a broader Solana meme season to 10x–50x from current levels, pushing FDV to $5M–$25M.

Genuine Ansem endorsement with on-chain proof of supply allocation
Broader Solana meme season with rising SOL price
Sustained new buyer inflow exceeding current sell pressure
Liquidity deepening to $500K+ reducing slippage and enabling larger trades
Viral social media moment (Twitter/X trending, influencer coverage)

Base Case

WIF2 experiences a partial retracement of 40–70% from current levels over the next 1–2 weeks as initial excitement fades, settling into a lower trading range with reduced volume. A small community of meme holders remains, but the token fails to achieve the scale of the original WIF.

Some continued speculative interest in the WIF sequel narrative
Sell pressure gradually normalizes as early holders finish distributing
Token survives without a complete rug or liquidity removal
No major exchange listings or influencer endorsements materialize

Bear Case

High probability

The pump has already peaked. Original 80 holders and early pump participants continue distributing into any buying pressure. Price retraces 80–95% back toward pre-pump levels ($0.000034–$0.000039) within days as liquidity is insufficient to absorb sell pressure.

73.6% sell pressure already dominant — distribution actively underway
Only $69K liquidity cannot absorb sustained selling
No verified utility, team, or roadmap — pure speculation
Unverified supply allocation claims erode trust when disproven
Historical pattern: token was dormant for 30 days, suggesting no organic community

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 29, 05:19 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-29 05:19 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

Solana on-chain metadata (mint: HRJLkc6vDysVHdrUpCsQ5EBx6fPM15TZRKAhfUBnpump)
PumpSwap trading pair data (GJA8ec4mGb79zP3cNiz92VDoZP4KHCSQPJ1xKNKaBHW1)
Hourly OHLC candle data (22 candles, June 28–29 2026)
Trading analytics (24h volume, buyer/seller counts, liquidity)
Historical holder metrics (30-day daily series)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

No top holder data available — cannot assess true supply concentration or identify insider wallets
No sniper data available — cannot assess early buyer PnL or dump risk from snipers
Supply concentration metrics (top10=0%, top100=0%) appear to be data artifacts rather than genuine distribution data
Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are unknown — cannot fully assess rug risk
OHLC candle data shows anomalous structure (Low > High in most candles) — technical analysis reliability is compromised
24h price change shows 0% in analytics despite 1,126% in price data — possible data inconsistency
Token description contains unverifiable claims ('25% to Ansem') that cannot be confirmed from available on-chain data
Only 22 hours of candle history available — insufficient for robust technical analysis

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Meme tokens carry extreme risk of total loss. The analyst has no position in WIF2. All claims about token allocation, team identity, or influencer involvement are UNVERIFIED and sourced from the token creator's own metadata — treat them with extreme skepticism. Past price performance (including the 1,126% 24h gain) is not indicative of future results. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose entirely.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is WIF2 a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, but wallets from the launch still hold 25% of the supply. Checked Nov 10, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell WIF2?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 10, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

What is the short-term price outlook for WIF2 (WIF2)?

The token has already pumped 1,126% in 24h with 73.6% sell pressure ($302K sells vs $108K buys). With only $69K in liquidity against a $486K FDV, any sustained selling will cause rapid price collapse. The 5-minute change is already -0.26%, suggesting momentum is fading. Short-term outlook is bearish as early buyers take profits. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–72 hours), with a target range of $0.000034 (recent OHLC close floor) to $0.000650 (if renewed buying momentum emerges).

Is WIF2 a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep experience in high-risk meme token trading. The combination of a post-pump entry point, dominant sell pressure, shallow liquidity, missing holder data, and unverifiable supply allocation claims makes this an extremely high-risk asset.

What are the key risks of holding WIF2?

No top holder data — impossible to assess true concentration or identify insider wallets • Unverified claim of 25% supply to Ansem — potential manipulation tactic to attract buyers • Token dormant for 30 days at 80 holders before single-day pump — classic coordinated pump pattern