WIF2

WIF2 Price Today & AI Analysis

WIF2SolanaAnalysis as of Jun 29, 2026

Price

$0.059076

+4.86% 24h

Contract

Live
HRJLkc6vDysVHdrUpCsQ5EBx6fPM15TZRKAhfUBnpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

3,853

Market cap

$9,068

More tokens on Solana

AircoinAircoinAircoin$0.054360-0.3%MC $4.2KJACKJACKJACKJACKZooko's Dog$0.042751+3.7%MC $24.0KCryptocratCryptocratThe Cryptocrats$0.055648+0.5%MC $5.6KGooseGooseThe Goose$0.058215+4.6%MC $8.2KCTOCTOChinese Take Over$0.053357+1.6%MC $3.4KTRUMPTRUMPOFFICIAL TRUMP$2.15+2.8%MC $2.15B

WIF2: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-29 05:19 UTC

Holder addresses

5,089

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$69,070.50
How concentrated is WIF2 ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 5,089 addresses (2026-06-29 05:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling WIF2?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is WIF2 liquidity falling?
As of 2026-06-29 05:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $69,070.50. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-29 05:19 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Ask Unhosted AI about WIF2

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Jun 29, 05:19 AM UTC

FDV

$486,266

Liquidity

$69,070.50

Holders

5,089

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

WIF2 (HRJLkc6vDysVHdrUpCsQ5EBx6fPM15TZRKAhfUBnpump) is a PumpFun-launched meme token on Solana, presenting itself as a sequel to the original dogwifhat (WIF) coin. The token launched with ~80 holders for nearly a month before an explosive single-day surge to 5,084 holders (+5,004 in one day, +98%) on June 28, 2026, accompanied by a 1,126% price spike. Current price is ~$0.000486, FDV ~$486K, with $69K in liquidity. Sell pressure is dominant at 73.6% of 24h volume ($302K sells vs $108K buys). The OHLC data shows highly anomalous candle structure. Top holder data is unavailable, and no sniper data exists. The description claims '25% supply to Ansem' — this is an unverified, potentially manipulative claim by the token creator and should be treated with extreme skepticism.

Key points

  • Explosive single-day holder growth: +5,004 holders (+98%) on June 28, 2026, after 30 days of complete stagnation at 80 holders
  • 1,126% 24h price surge with dominant sell pressure (73.6% sell volume, $302K vs $108K buys)
  • Anomalous OHLC candle structure: Open/High/Close values appear inverted across all 22 candles, suggesting data artifact or extreme price manipulation
  • Unverified claim of '25% supply to Ansem' in token description — a classic meme token marketing tactic that cannot be confirmed from on-chain data
  • No top holder data available, zero supply concentration metrics reported — critical transparency gap

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–72 hours

bearish

The token has already pumped 1,126% in 24h with 73.6% sell pressure ($302K sells vs $108K buys). With only $69K in liquidity against a $486K FDV, any sustained selling will cause rapid price collapse. The 5-minute change is already -0.26%, suggesting momentum is fading. Short-term outlook is bearish as early buyers take profits.

Target low

$0.000034 (recent OHLC close floor)

Target high

$0.000650 (if renewed buying momentum emerges)

Support

$0.000034 (recurring OHLC close level across 22 candles), $0.000039 (recurring OHLC open/high level)

Resistance

$0.000486 (current price / 24h high zone), $0.000650 (psychological extension target)

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

bearish

The token spent 30 days dormant at 80 holders before a single-day viral event. Without sustained community development, exchange listings, or genuine utility, the pattern is consistent with a pump-and-dump cycle. Medium-term outlook is bearish unless new catalysts emerge.

Catalysts

  • Genuine Ansem endorsement or on-chain proof of supply allocation (currently unverified)
  • Broader Solana meme season continuation
  • Viral social media momentum sustaining new buyer inflow
  • Liquidity deepening above $500K to reduce slippage risk

Bullish factors

  • 1,126% price appreciation in 24h demonstrates strong speculative demand
  • +5,004 new holders in a single day shows viral spread potential
  • 1h price change of +67% suggests momentum is still active in the short term
  • 6h price change of +169.7% confirms strong recent upward move
  • Meme token narrative (WIF sequel) has proven viral appeal in Solana ecosystem

Bearish factors

  • 73.6% sell pressure ($302K sells vs $108K buys) — sellers dominate heavily
  • Only $69K total liquidity against $486K FDV creates extreme slippage risk
  • Token was dormant for 30 days at 80 holders before the pump — no organic growth
  • No top holder data available — cannot assess concentration or dump risk
  • Unverified claims about Ansem allocation are a common manipulation tactic
  • 5-minute price change already turning negative (-0.26%) suggesting peak may be in
  • Contract not verified; update authority unknown; mutable=false but other metadata unclear

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) anomalous OHLC data structure making technical analysis unreliable, (2) no top holder data available, (3) no sniper data, (4) zero supply concentration metrics, and (5) the token's behavior is consistent with a coordinated pump event rather than organic growth.

WIF2 call history

Full track record →

Jun 29bearish
24h+1.2%
7d-93.8%
30d-98.2%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
HRJLkc...pump
Total Supply
999,876,262.38

Key Risks

  • No top holder data — impossible to assess true concentration or identify insider wallets
  • Unverified claim of 25% supply to Ansem — potential manipulation tactic to attract buyers
  • Token dormant for 30 days at 80 holders before single-day pump — classic coordinated pump pattern
  • 73.6% sell pressure with 1,798 sellers vs 653 buyers — active distribution phase

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 22 hourly OHLC candles (June 28–29, 2026) display a highly anomalous structure: in nearly every candle, the Low value is HIGHER than both the Open and Close, which is mathematically impossible in standard OHLC notation. For example, candle [1] shows O:0.0000391, H:0.0000391, L:0.000367, C:0.0000341 — the 'Low' of 0.000367 is far above the Open and Close. This suggests either a data feed error (Low/High fields may be swapped or represent something else entirely) or extreme intra-candle volatility with the price spiking to those levels and collapsing. Taking the anomalous 'L' values as actual intra-candle highs, the token reached peaks ranging from ~$0.000082 (candle 18) to ~$0.000367 (candle 1), showing an upward trend in intra-candle spikes over the 22-hour period. The consistent O/C oscillation between ~$0.0000341 and ~$0.0000391 across all candles suggests a very tight base range before the current price of $0.000486 (which is far above all candle values, consistent with the 1,126% 24h move occurring after these candles).

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Short and medium term are technically in uptrend given the 1,126% 24h price surge. However, the trend is driven by a single explosive event rather than sustained accumulation, and sell pressure is dominant. The candle data predates the main pump, showing a tight consolidation range of $0.0000341–$0.0000391 before the breakout.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

26%

Sell

74%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000039 (recurring OHLC open/high base across all 22 candles)

Major support

$0.000034 (recurring OHLC close floor — the lowest consistent price level in candle data)

Immediate resistance

$0.000486 (current price — represents the post-pump level, far above candle range)

Major resistance

$0.000650 (psychological extension; no prior price history at this level)

The candle data shows a tight consolidation between $0.0000341 and $0.0000391 for the entire 22-hour window captured, with anomalous intra-candle spikes. The current price of $0.000486 is approximately 12x above the candle range, meaning there is virtually no technical support between $0.000039 and $0.000486 — a massive air gap that represents extreme downside risk if selling accelerates.

Notable patterns

  • Anomalous OHLC structure: 'Low' values consistently exceed Open/High/Close — possible data feed inversion or extreme wick behavior
  • Tight open/close oscillation ($0.0000341–$0.0000391) across all 22 candles suggests pre-pump consolidation or bot-driven price stabilization
  • Volume spike in candle [2] ($114K) followed by sharp decline — classic pump volume exhaustion pattern
  • Current price ($0.000486) is ~12x above the entire 22-candle range — massive gap with no support structure
  • Consistent alternating open/close pattern across all candles may indicate automated market-making or wash trading activity

Liquidity

Liquidity

$69,070.50

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $69K against a $486K FDV — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of only ~14.2%. This means any moderately sized sell order will cause severe slippage. The 24h trading volume of ~$410K is nearly 6x the total liquidity, indicating extremely high turnover relative to pool depth. Net flow is strongly negative: $302K in sells vs $108K in buys, a 2.79:1 sell-to-buy ratio. Unique sellers (1,798) outnumber unique buyers (653) by 2.75:1. The token trades on PumpSwap (pair GJA8ec4mGb79zP3cNiz92VDoZP4KHCSQPJ1xKNKaBHW1), which is consistent with a PumpFun-launched token. Market health is poor: shallow liquidity, dominant sell pressure, and a price that has already pumped 1,126% — all classic signs of a distribution phase following a coordinated pump.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,876,262.38

FDV

$486,265.68

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    1,126% 24h price surge followed by dominant sell pressure (73.6%) and only $69K liquidity. Extreme volatility with massive downside gap — current price ($0.000486) is ~12x above the pre-pump candle range ($0.000034–$0.000039), meaning a full retracement would represent a ~92% loss.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity of $69K against $486K FDV (14.2% ratio) and $410K 24h volume. Any sell order above a few thousand dollars will experience severe slippage. Pool is on PumpSwap with no evidence of additional liquidity sources.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • No top holder data — impossible to assess true concentration or identify insider wallets
  • Unverified claim of 25% supply to Ansem — potential manipulation tactic to attract buyers
  • Token dormant for 30 days at 80 holders before single-day pump — classic coordinated pump pattern
  • 73.6% sell pressure with 1,798 sellers vs 653 buyers — active distribution phase
  • Only $69K liquidity — extreme slippage risk on any meaningful sell order
  • Current price ~12x above pre-pump candle range with no technical support in between
  • Contract not verified; update authority unknown
  • 4,430 of 5,089 holders acquired via transfer — unusual ratio suggesting possible wallet seeding
  • 24h price change reported as 0% in analytics despite 1,126% change in price data — data inconsistency raises questions

Mitigating factors

  • Mutable=false reduces metadata manipulation risk
  • PumpFun launch provides some standardization and transparency
  • Genuine viral meme potential — WIF was a multi-billion dollar token; sequel narrative has proven appeal
  • 5,089 holders in 24h shows real market interest and distribution breadth
  • Token is listed as 'possible spam: false' by the data provider

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep experience in high-risk meme token trading. The combination of a post-pump entry point, dominant sell pressure, shallow liquidity, missing holder data, and unverifiable supply allocation claims makes this an extremely high-risk asset.

WIF2 is a high-risk meme token that has already executed its primary pump (+1,126% in 24h). The investment thesis is almost entirely speculative, relying on continued viral momentum in the Solana meme ecosystem. The token exhibits multiple red flags consistent with a coordinated pump-and-dump: 30 days of dormancy at 80 holders, single-day explosive growth, dominant sell pressure, shallow liquidity, and unverifiable supply allocation claims. Any investment at current prices is a bet on finding a greater fool before the original 80 holders complete their distribution.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

WIF2 achieves genuine viral status as a Solana meme token sequel, attracts influencer attention (including possible genuine Ansem involvement), and rides a broader Solana meme season to 10x–50x from current levels, pushing FDV to $5M–$25M.

  • Genuine Ansem endorsement with on-chain proof of supply allocation
  • Broader Solana meme season with rising SOL price
  • Sustained new buyer inflow exceeding current sell pressure
  • Liquidity deepening to $500K+ reducing slippage and enabling larger trades
  • Viral social media moment (Twitter/X trending, influencer coverage)

Base Case

WIF2 experiences a partial retracement of 40–70% from current levels over the next 1–2 weeks as initial excitement fades, settling into a lower trading range with reduced volume. A small community of meme holders remains, but the token fails to achieve the scale of the original WIF.

  • Some continued speculative interest in the WIF sequel narrative
  • Sell pressure gradually normalizes as early holders finish distributing
  • Token survives without a complete rug or liquidity removal
  • No major exchange listings or influencer endorsements materialize

Bear Case

High probability

The pump has already peaked. Original 80 holders and early pump participants continue distributing into any buying pressure. Price retraces 80–95% back toward pre-pump levels ($0.000034–$0.000039) within days as liquidity is insufficient to absorb sell pressure.

  • 73.6% sell pressure already dominant — distribution actively underway
  • Only $69K liquidity cannot absorb sustained selling
  • No verified utility, team, or roadmap — pure speculation
  • Unverified supply allocation claims erode trust when disproven
  • Historical pattern: token was dormant for 30 days, suggesting no organic community

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 29, 05:19 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-29 05:19 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Solana on-chain metadata (mint: HRJLkc6vDysVHdrUpCsQ5EBx6fPM15TZRKAhfUBnpump)
  • PumpSwap trading pair data (GJA8ec4mGb79zP3cNiz92VDoZP4KHCSQPJ1xKNKaBHW1)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (22 candles, June 28–29 2026)
  • Trading analytics (24h volume, buyer/seller counts, liquidity)
  • Historical holder metrics (30-day daily series)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • No top holder data available — cannot assess true supply concentration or identify insider wallets
  • No sniper data available — cannot assess early buyer PnL or dump risk from snipers
  • Supply concentration metrics (top10=0%, top100=0%) appear to be data artifacts rather than genuine distribution data
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are unknown — cannot fully assess rug risk
  • OHLC candle data shows anomalous structure (Low > High in most candles) — technical analysis reliability is compromised
  • 24h price change shows 0% in analytics despite 1,126% in price data — possible data inconsistency
  • Token description contains unverifiable claims ('25% to Ansem') that cannot be confirmed from available on-chain data
  • Only 22 hours of candle history available — insufficient for robust technical analysis

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Meme tokens carry extreme risk of total loss. The analyst has no position in WIF2. All claims about token allocation, team identity, or influencer involvement are UNVERIFIED and sourced from the token creator's own metadata — treat them with extreme skepticism. Past price performance (including the 1,126% 24h gain) is not indicative of future results. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose entirely.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is WIF2 ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 5,089 addresses (2026-06-29 05:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling WIF2?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is WIF2 liquidity falling?

As of 2026-06-29 05:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $69,070.50. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for WIF2 (WIF2)?

The token has already pumped 1,126% in 24h with 73.6% sell pressure ($302K sells vs $108K buys). With only $69K in liquidity against a $486K FDV, any sustained selling will cause rapid price collapse. The 5-minute change is already -0.26%, suggesting momentum is fading. Short-term outlook is bearish as early buyers take profits. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–72 hours), with a target range of $0.000034 (recent OHLC close floor) to $0.000650 (if renewed buying momentum emerges).

Is WIF2 a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep experience in high-risk meme token trading. The combination of a post-pump entry point, dominant sell pressure, shallow liquidity, missing holder data, and unverifiable supply allocation claims makes this an extremely high-risk asset.

What are the key risks of holding WIF2?

No top holder data — impossible to assess true concentration or identify insider wallets • Unverified claim of 25% supply to Ansem — potential manipulation tactic to attract buyers • Token dormant for 30 days at 80 holders before single-day pump — classic coordinated pump pattern

← Back to all predictions

Track WIF2