CHARM

charm.fun Price Today & AI Analysis

CHARMSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 19, 2026

Price

$0.054523

-16.12% 24h · FDV $4,390

Contract

Live
XhA6oYjFSpe8HxhFJJopxxFAQKcQmEwHZXF6DRJpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,809

Market cap

$4,390

More tokens on Solana

HONTERHONTERhonter boden$0.044250+7.7%MC $41.0KSTANKSSTANKSStanks$0.041379-1.8%MC $13.8KPIEPIEAlpie$0.6773+3.2%MC $321.7KMaccaMaccaMacca The Gator$0.042410-4.3%MC $24.1Kvibeshiftvibeshiftvibeshift$0.000128+6.7%MC $127.9KZECZECZcash$1,568.94+8.3%MC $160.58M

charm.fun: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-19 22:15 UTC

Holder addresses

1,809

Top 10 supply share

5.01%

Reported liquidity

$3,265.00
How concentrated is charm.fun ownership?
As of 2026-09-19 22:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 5.01% of supply. It reports 1,809 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling charm.fun?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-19 22:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $898.00 in buys and $1,116.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is charm.fun liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed -8.51%, from $3,568.75 (2026-09-18 23:00 UTC) to $3,264.99 (2026-09-19 22:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-19 22:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-18 23:00 UTC$3,568.75
2026-09-19 00:00 UTC$3,657.33
2026-09-19 01:00 UTC$3,654.12
2026-09-19 02:00 UTC$3,649.94
2026-09-19 03:00 UTC$3,588.81
2026-09-19 04:00 UTC$3,691.97
2026-09-19 05:00 UTC$3,655.36
2026-09-19 06:00 UTC$3,615.72
2026-09-19 07:00 UTC$3,607.46
2026-09-19 08:00 UTC$3,582.16
2026-09-19 09:00 UTC$3,531.87
2026-09-19 10:00 UTC$3,543.89
2026-09-19 11:00 UTC$3,554.10
2026-09-19 12:00 UTC$3,427.82
2026-09-19 13:00 UTC$3,422.97
2026-09-19 14:00 UTC$3,395.29
2026-09-19 15:00 UTC$3,347.98
2026-09-19 16:00 UTC$3,330.55
2026-09-19 17:00 UTC$3,310.13
2026-09-19 18:00 UTC$3,270.94
2026-09-19 19:00 UTC$3,274.63
2026-09-19 20:00 UTC$3,269.46
2026-09-19 21:00 UTC$3,274.45
2026-09-19 22:00 UTC$3,264.99

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about CHARM

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 19, 10:16 PM UTC

FDV

$4,390

Liquidity

$3,265.00

Holders

1,809

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

CHARM (charm.fun) is a very small Solana micro-cap token trading on PumpSwap with a fully diluted valuation of just $4.39K and total liquidity of only $3.27K. The token has declined 16.1% over the past 24 hours, forming a pattern of lower highs and lower lows, with sell volume (55.4%) and unique sellers (291) substantially outweighing buy volume (44.6%) and unique buyers (91). Top-10 holder concentration stands at a relatively low 5.01% of supply across 1,809 holder addresses, but this is only a current snapshot - no holder history, wallet classification, sniper activity, or mint/freeze authority data was available, leaving significant gaps in the risk picture.

Key points

  • Extremely low liquidity ($3.27K) and FDV ($4.39K) relative to typical tokens, indicating an early-stage or low-traction launch
  • Top-10 holder concentration of 5.01% is comparatively low, though broader concentration and classification data are missing
  • Complete absence of mint/freeze authority verification and sniper-wallet data, an important due-diligence gap
  • Clear negative 24h price and volume trend with sellers heavily outnumbering buyers

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24-48 hours

bearish

The prevailing 24h trend is down (-16.1%), with price currently consolidating near session lows around $0.00000452. Absent a clear bullish catalyst or volume pickup, the path of least resistance appears to be sideways-to-down, though the narrowing range and shrinking volume in the last few candles leave room for a short-term bounce toward immediate resistance.

Target low

$0.00000420

Target high

$0.00000480

Support

$0.00000450, $0.00000420 (extrapolated below 24h low)

Resistance

$0.00000460, $0.00000480, $0.00000528 (prior consolidation zone)

Medium term · 1-2 weeks

neutral

With only 24 hours of OHLC data available, medium-term directional conviction is low. The token's extremely small liquidity ($3.27K) and FDV ($4.39K) mean price action will likely remain highly volatile and sensitive to individual trades or wallet movements rather than following technical patterns typical of more liquid assets.

Catalysts

  • Any meaningful increase in liquidity or trading volume
  • Social media/community activity given the token's Twitter and website links
  • Potential listing or exposure on additional trading venues
  • Continued sell pressure from existing holders could suppress price further

Bullish factors

  • Momentum showed signs of flattening/seller exhaustion in the final candles with sharply reduced volume
  • Top-10 holder concentration is relatively low at 5.01%, suggesting less risk of a single large holder dumping and crashing price further
  • Active social presence (Twitter, website) could support community-driven demand

Bearish factors

  • 24h price down 16.1% with a clear pattern of lower highs and lower lows
  • Sell volume (55.4%) exceeds buy volume (44.6%) over the last 24h
  • Unique sellers (291) vastly outnumber unique buyers (91) in the last 24h
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($3.27K) creates high volatility and slippage risk, amplifying downside moves
  • Tiny FDV of $4.39K signals a very early-stage, low-conviction, high-risk micro-cap token

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because only a single 24-hour window of hourly candles is available (no multi-day history), liquidity is extremely thin ($3.27K) making price highly manipulable by small trades, and key risk inputs (holder history, sniper data, authority status) are entirely missing. Predictions here are directional extrapolations of very limited data, not robust forecasts.

CHARM call history

Full track record →

Sep 19bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
XhA6oY...pump
Total Supply
970,508,488.71 CHARM

Key Risks

  • Extremely low liquidity ($3.27K) and FDV ($4.39K) make this a high-risk micro-cap token prone to severe price swings from small trades
  • 24h price decline of -16.1% with sell volume and unique sellers substantially outweighing buyers, indicating net negative momentum
  • Mint/freeze authority status is completely unknown, leaving open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing
  • No sniper or holder-history data available, preventing assessment of coordinated early-buyer dumping or genuine organic holder growth

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Over the most recent 24 hourly candles, price opened near $0.00000528, rallied to a local high of $0.00000576 (candle 3) within the first few hours, then entered a sustained downtrend, closing the period at $0.00000452 - a peak-to-trough decline of roughly 21.5% from the high. The pattern shows an initial bullish push (candles 1-6) followed by a consistent series of lower highs and lower lows from candle 14 onward, with only minor relief bounces (e.g., candles 21-23).

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

Both short-term (last ~6 hours) and medium-term (full 24h window) trends are downward. After topping out around $0.00000576 in the early hours, price has made a series of lower highs and lower lows, with the most recent candles stabilizing weakly in the $0.0000045-$0.0000046 range but showing no clear reversal signal yet.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

45%

Sell

55%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00000450 (candles 20, 21, 23 lows)

Major support

$0.00000452 (24h low, current price area)

Immediate resistance

$0.00000460 (candle 18-19 area)

Major resistance

$0.00000576 (candle 3 high, 24h peak)

Price is currently trading near the bottom of its 24h range, just above the $0.0000045 support cluster formed over the last several candles. A break below this level could open a path to further downside given thin liquidity, while reclaiming $0.0000046-$0.0000048 would be the first sign of stabilization. The major resistance at the 24h high of $0.00000576 remains distant, roughly 27% above the current price.

Notable patterns

  • Lower highs and lower lows from candle 14 through candle 20, consistent with a defined downtrend
  • Sharp single-candle drop at candle 14 (open $0.00000529 to close $0.00000491, ~7% decline) suggesting a concentrated sell event
  • Volume climax during the decline (candles 14-16) followed by volume drying up into the close, a pattern often associated with either seller exhaustion or simply fading interest
  • Narrow-range consolidation in the final 4-5 candles near local lows, which could precede either a bounce or a continuation lower depending on catalyst

Liquidity

Liquidity

$3,265.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $3.27K against a fully diluted valuation of only $4.39K indicates an extremely small, nascent, and thinly traded market. This level of liquidity means even modest trade sizes (a few hundred dollars) can produce significant price slippage, and the token is highly vulnerable to sharp swings from single large orders. 24h sell volume ($1.12K, 55.4% of volume) outweighs buy volume ($898, 44.6%), reflecting a net outflow bias. Notably, sellers (291 unique) vastly outnumber buyers (91 unique) despite sell count (294) not being proportionally higher than buy count (113) - this suggests many small sell transactions from a broad set of wallets, which could reflect organic profit-taking or distributed selling pressure across the holder base. Given the shallow liquidity pool, slippage risk is high for any meaningfully sized trade in either direction.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

970,508,488.71 CHARM

FDV

$4.39K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price fell 16.1% in the last 24 hours alone, with an intraday swing from a high of $0.00000576 to a low of $0.00000452 (a ~21.5% peak-to-trough range), demonstrating substantial volatility typical of a micro-cap token with shallow liquidity.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is just $3.27K against an FDV of $4.39K. This is an extremely thin market where modest trade sizes can cause large slippage, and liquidity could be withdrawn or could evaporate with little warning.

  • Concentrationunknown

    Only the top-10 holder concentration (5.01%) is available; top-100 concentration and wallet classifications are unavailable, so a full concentration risk picture cannot be formed. The low top-10 figure is a data point but not conclusive given the missing broader context (e.g., possible undisclosed wallet linkages or exchange/LP wallets not separated out).

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely low liquidity ($3.27K) and FDV ($4.39K) make this a high-risk micro-cap token prone to severe price swings from small trades
  • 24h price decline of -16.1% with sell volume and unique sellers substantially outweighing buyers, indicating net negative momentum
  • Mint/freeze authority status is completely unknown, leaving open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing
  • No sniper or holder-history data available, preventing assessment of coordinated early-buyer dumping or genuine organic holder growth
  • Only a snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration is available; broader concentration (top-100) and wallet classification data are missing

Mitigating factors

  • Top-10 holder concentration is relatively low at 5.01% of supply, based on the limited data available
  • Holder base of 1,809 addresses suggests some degree of distribution, though this does not account for potential Sybil/multi-wallet behavior
  • Token has an active social presence (Twitter, website) which may support ongoing community engagement

Suitable for

Given the very high risk profile - shallow liquidity, unknown authority status, absent sniper/holder-history data, and a clear negative 24h price trend - this token is only potentially suitable for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who can afford total loss of capital and who conduct further independent due diligence (including manually verifying mint/freeze authority on-chain) before any allocation. It is not suitable for risk-averse or long-term fundamental investors given the current data gaps.

CHARM is a micro-cap Solana token (FDV ~$4.39K, liquidity ~$3.27K) trading on PumpSwap with a clear 24h downtrend (-16.1%) and net sell-side pressure. Critical risk data - mint/freeze authority status, sniper activity, and holder history - is entirely unavailable, making this an extremely speculative and data-poor setup. Any thesis here rests on very limited evidence and should be treated as informational only, not a recommendation.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If selling pressure exhausts (as hinted by the shrinking volume in the final candles) and renewed buying interest emerges - potentially driven by social media/community momentum given the token's active Twitter and website presence - price could stabilize and rebound toward the $0.0000048-$0.00000528 prior consolidation zone.

  • Signs of seller exhaustion in the most recent candles (narrowing range, falling volume)
  • Relatively low top-10 holder concentration (5.01%) reduces immediate large-holder dump risk
  • Active social channels could catalyze renewed retail interest

Base Case

Absent new catalysts, the token likely continues to trade in a narrow, volatile range near current levels ($0.0000045-$0.0000048), with price highly sensitive to individual trades given the thin liquidity pool, and no strong directional conviction achievable from the limited data available.

  • No material change in liquidity provision or authority status in the near term
  • Trading volume remains low and dominated by small retail-sized transactions
  • No new holder-history or sniper data becomes available to materially change the risk picture

Bear Case

High probability

Given the extremely shallow liquidity, ongoing net sell pressure (55.4% sell vs 44.6% buy volume, 291 unique sellers vs 91 unique buyers), and total absence of verified authority safeguards, the token could continue declining or become effectively illiquid, with limited ability for holders to exit without significant slippage.

  • Persistent lower-highs/lower-lows pattern over the observed 24h window
  • Sell volume and seller count materially exceeding buy-side activity
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open tail risks of supply dilution or account restrictions
  • Extremely low liquidity means any further exit pressure could sharply depress price

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 19, 10:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-19 22:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Token metadata (mint address, supply, decimals, description, social links)
  • USD price snapshot and 24h % change
  • 24 hourly OHLC candles (most recent 24 hours) on PumpSwap pair 85vU296pMjoMWZb6BERhWXMbKDswbzzBB6rwA9tFv1JK
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count, top-10 supply share)

Limitations

  • No sniper data was available ('No sniper data available'), preventing any assessment of sniper concentration, PnL, or dump risk
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) was available, only a single current snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration
  • No wallet classification data was available, so no notable holders (whales, exchanges, team wallets) could be identified
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, and verified contract/spam status were all unknown, preventing rug-risk assessment from authorities
  • Only 24 hours of hourly OHLC data was provided, limiting medium/long-term technical and trend analysis
  • Top-100 holder concentration was not provided, limiting the concentration risk picture to only the top-10 figure

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain data and is provided for informational purposes only. It is NOT financial advice and should NOT be relied upon as the sole basis for any investment decision. Cryptocurrency tokens, especially micro-cap tokens with shallow liquidity like this one, carry substantial risk of loss, including total loss of capital. Data gaps identified above (authority status, sniper activity, holder history) mean key risk factors could not be fully assessed. Independent due diligence and verification of on-chain authority permissions is strongly recommended before any engagement with this token.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is charm.fun ownership?

As of 2026-09-19 22:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 5.01% of supply. It reports 1,809 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling charm.fun?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-19 22:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $898.00 in buys and $1,116.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is charm.fun liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed -8.51%, from $3,568.75 (2026-09-18 23:00 UTC) to $3,264.99 (2026-09-19 22:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for charm.fun (CHARM)?

The prevailing 24h trend is down (-16.1%), with price currently consolidating near session lows around $0.00000452. Absent a clear bullish catalyst or volume pickup, the path of least resistance appears to be sideways-to-down, though the narrowing range and shrinking volume in the last few candles leave room for a short-term bounce toward immediate resistance. Short-term outlook is bearish (24-48 hours), with a target range of $0.00000420 to $0.00000480.

Is CHARM a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Given the very high risk profile - shallow liquidity, unknown authority status, absent sniper/holder-history data, and a clear negative 24h price trend - this token is only potentially suitable for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who can afford total loss of capital and who conduct further independent due diligence (including manually verifying mint/freeze authority on-chain) before any allocation. It is not suitable for risk-averse or long-term fundamental investors given the current data gaps.

What are the key risks of holding CHARM?

Extremely low liquidity ($3.27K) and FDV ($4.39K) make this a high-risk micro-cap token prone to severe price swings from small trades • 24h price decline of -16.1% with sell volume and unique sellers substantially outweighing buyers, indicating net negative momentum • Mint/freeze authority status is completely unknown, leaving open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing

← Back to all predictions

Track CHARM