HLI

Hliland Price Today & AI Analysis

HLISolanaAnalysis as of Jun 19, 2026

Price

$0.054687

FDV $4,684

Contract

Live
H3i1AwrZzubrni3quqaV74G6FSBiXyEtLq9fmnpqpump

Chain

Holders

238

Market cap

$4,684

More tokens on Solana

Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about HLI

Continue in chat

Report snapshot

as of Jun 19, 05:19 AM UTC

FDV

$165,088

Liquidity

$44,664

Holders

387

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

HLI (Hliland) is an extremely early-stage Solana memecoin/gaming token launched on PumpSwap (mint: H3i1AwrZzubrni3quqaV74G6FSBiXyEtLq9fmnpqpump). The token experienced a massive 525% price spike in the last 24 hours, surging from near-zero activity after sitting dormant for ~30 days with only 36 holders. In the past 24 hours, holders jumped from 36 to 387 (+351, +91%), almost entirely via swaps. Liquidity is extremely thin at $44.66K, FDV is only $165K, and sell pressure dominates at 68.5% of 24h volume. The token is unverified, update authority is unknown, and top holder data is unavailable — all significant red flags for a newly viral micro-cap.

Key points

  • Explosive 525% 24h price surge after ~30 days of complete dormancy (36 holders, zero activity)
  • Holder base grew 975% in 24h (36 → 387), almost entirely via swaps — suggesting viral/bot-driven onboarding
  • Sell pressure heavily dominates: 68.5% sell vs 31.5% buy pressure on $148K combined 24h volume
  • Extremely thin liquidity ($44.66K) relative to FDV ($165K) — high slippage and exit risk
  • No top holder data, no sniper data, unknown update authority — severe transparency gaps

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token has already pumped 525% in 24h and is showing 68.5% sell pressure with 1,615 sells vs 865 buys. The OHLC data shows a sharp spike followed by a pullback candle (candle [2] closed lower than it opened). With only $44.66K in liquidity and a heavily sell-dominated order flow, a sharp retracement is the most probable short-term outcome. The 5m and 1h price changes (+58% and +134%) suggest the pump may still be in progress, but exhaustion signals are present.

Target low

$0.000019

Target high

$0.000085

Support

$0.000019 (candle [3] low), $0.000029 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close)

Resistance

$0.000071 (candle [3] high), $0.000085 (candle [1] low — data anomaly, likely spike high)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

Given the token's 30-day dormancy prior to this pump, the absence of any organic holder growth, the lack of verified contract or known team, and the overwhelming sell pressure, medium-term price action is likely to revert toward pre-pump levels unless a genuine catalyst (product launch, exchange listing, community growth) emerges. The gaming/farming narrative in the description is unverified.

Catalysts

  • Verified product or game launch that substantiates the 'grow crops, hunt monsters' description
  • Exchange listing or major influencer promotion
  • Sustained organic holder growth beyond the current swap-driven spike
  • Liquidity deepening above $500K to reduce slippage risk

Bullish factors

  • 525% price surge demonstrates strong speculative demand
  • Holder count grew 975% in 24h (36 → 387), showing rapid community onboarding
  • Gaming/farming narrative could attract a niche community if product is real
  • PumpSwap listing provides accessible entry for retail traders
  • 5m and 1h momentum still strongly positive (+58%, +134%)

Bearish factors

  • 68.5% sell pressure ($101.35K sells vs $46.65K buys) — sellers dominate
  • Only $44.66K total liquidity — any meaningful sell order causes severe slippage
  • 30 days of complete dormancy (36 holders, zero net change) before this pump — no organic growth
  • Unverified contract, unknown update authority, no top holder transparency
  • Token is not verified and metadata mutability status is unclear
  • FDV of only $165K with no demonstrated utility or product

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) missing top holder data making it impossible to assess concentration risk precisely, (2) no sniper data, (3) only 3 OHLC candles available for technical analysis, (4) the token's extreme micro-cap status and thin liquidity make price highly manipulable, and (5) the 6h and 24h price change fields both show 0% which conflicts with the 525% 24h figure — suggesting data inconsistencies.

HLI call history

Full track record →

Jun 19bearish
24h-45.8%
7d-93.5%
30d-97.3%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
H3i1Aw...pump
Total Supply
999,877,190.79

Key Risks

  • Extreme price volatility — 525% pump with 68.5% sell pressure suggests imminent reversal
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($44.66K) — high slippage and exit risk
  • Unknown update/mint/freeze authority — potential for rug pull or token manipulation
  • No top holder data — concentration risk cannot be assessed

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidenceHigh risk

No sniper data is available for HLI. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper analysis. What can be inferred from trading analytics: 609 unique sellers vs 275 unique buyers in 24h (a 2.2:1 seller-to-buyer ratio) suggests early participants are distributing to late buyers. The token was dormant for 30 days with only 36 holders before this pump, meaning the original 36 holders are the de facto 'early buyers' and are likely the primary sellers in this event.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration
0.00%
PnL state
Unknown
Sell-through rate
Unknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available for this token.

The original 36 holders who held through 30 days of dormancy are likely distributing into the pump. With 609 sellers vs 275 buyers and $101.35K in sell volume vs $46.65K in buy volume, early holders appear to be taking profits aggressively. Sentiment among early buyers is likely opportunistic/exit-oriented.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly OHLC candles are available. Note: The OHLC data contains an anomaly — in candle [1] (05:00 UTC), the Low ($0.0000847) is higher than the High ($0.0000453), which is physically impossible and suggests a data feed error or inverted field labeling. Interpreting with caution: Candle [3] (03:00 UTC) shows a wide-range candle with a low of $0.0000194 and high of $0.0000715, closing at $0.0000435 — a bullish recovery from the low but closing well below the high (upper wick). Candle [2] (04:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000453, held a tight range, and closed lower at $0.0000292 — a bearish close. Candle [1] (05:00 UTC) shows a spike with volume of $26K. Overall pattern suggests a volatile pump-and-dump structure with large wicks indicating rejection at highs.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is technically upward given the 525% 24h price gain, but the candle structure shows bearish reversal signals (lower close, upper wicks). Medium-term trend is sideways-to-down given 30 days of zero price/holder movement prior to this event.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

32%

Sell

69%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000029 (candle [2] close / candle [1] open)

Major support

$0.000019 (candle [3] low — recent swing low)

Immediate resistance

$0.000071 (candle [3] high)

Major resistance

$0.000085 (anomalous candle [1] spike level)

Support is thin given the shallow liquidity. The $0.000029 level acted as both a close and open across candles, making it a key pivot. A break below $0.000019 would signal capitulation. Resistance at $0.000071 represents the recent swing high from candle [3]. These levels are derived from only 3 candles and should be treated with very low confidence.

Notable patterns

  • Upper wick rejection on candle [3] — price spiked to $0.0000715 but closed at $0.0000435, indicating selling pressure at highs
  • Bearish close on candle [2] — opened at $0.0000453, closed at $0.0000292 (lower close = bearish momentum)
  • High-volume sell candle at 04:00 UTC ($76.2K volume) — largest candle by volume, bearish close
  • Possible pump-and-dump structure: 30 days dormant → sudden viral spike → sell-dominated volume
  • Data anomaly in candle [1] OHLC fields (Low > High) — treat this candle's levels with caution

Holder growth

Total holders

387

24h Δ

+351

7d Δ

+351

30d Δ

+351

Accelerating Growth

Yes

Correlation with price

Holder growth is tightly correlated with the price spike — both occurred simultaneously in the last 24 hours after 30 days of complete stagnation. The historical data shows exactly 36 holders with zero net change every single day from 2026-05-20 through 2026-06-18. Then in a single 24h window, holders jumped by +351 (+91% reported, though the actual increase from 36 to 387 represents a ~975% increase). This is a viral/speculative onboarding event, not organic growth.

The holder trend is technically 'growing' and 'accelerating' but this is entirely driven by a single speculative pump event, not organic adoption. For 30 consecutive days, the token had exactly 36 holders with zero net change — indicating complete dormancy. The sudden +351 holder surge in 24h (36 → 387) is almost entirely via swaps (379 of 387 total holders acquired via swap). This pattern is consistent with a pump event attracting speculative retail traders rather than genuine community building. The 7d and 30d growth figures are identical to the 24h figure, confirming all growth occurred in the last 24 hours. Sustainability of this holder growth is highly questionable given the dominant sell pressure.

Concentration

Top 10 hold

0.00%

Top 100 hold

0.00%

Sentiment

Mixed

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for this token — the data source returned no top 20 holders. Supply concentration metrics show top10=0% and top100=0%, which likely reflects a data gap rather than genuine even distribution. The distribution breakdown (whales=0, sharks=0, dolphins=0, fish=0, octopus=0) further confirms the holder classification data is missing or not yet indexed. This is a significant transparency gap. Given the token's micro-cap status, thin liquidity, and the fact that 36 original holders existed for 30 days before the pump, it is highly probable that a small number of wallets hold a disproportionate share of supply. Investors should treat concentration risk as HIGH until verifiable holder data is available.

Notable holders

  • No top holder data availableN/A0.00%

Liquidity

Liquidity

$44,660

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $44.66K on PumpSwap (pair: 4Tr8T9U4MHqngATWQJ868xf7XR9sdRBD5m9V7jzHHpbL). The FDV of $165K is only ~3.7x the liquidity pool, meaning any significant sell order will cause severe price impact. Net flow is clearly outflow: sell volume ($101.35K) is 2.17x buy volume ($46.65K), and unique sellers (609) outnumber unique buyers (275) by 2.2:1. The 24h combined volume of ~$148K exceeds the total liquidity pool by 3.3x, indicating extremely high turnover relative to pool depth. Market health is poor — this is a thin, sell-dominated market with high slippage risk for any position of meaningful size.

Flow (24h)

Buy volume

$46,650

Sell volume

$101,350

Net flow

Outflow

Unique buyers

275

Unique sellers

609

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,877,190.79

FDV

$165,087.51

Mint authority

Active

Freeze authority

Active

Total supply is ~999.88M tokens with an FDV of $165K at current prices. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, making it impossible to determine whether mint or freeze authorities have been renounced. The token metadata is marked as 'Mutable: false', which is a mild positive signal suggesting the metadata itself cannot be changed. However, the contract is unverified ('Verified contract: false'), and the update authority status is opaque. The token was launched via PumpFun (mint address ends in 'pump'), which typically uses a bonding curve mechanism. Rug risk from authorities cannot be assessed without knowing the authority addresses — this should be treated as elevated risk by default. The gaming/farming description ('grow crops, make friends, hunt monsters') is unverified and no product links or audits are available.

  • Volatilityhigh

    525% price move in 24h on a micro-cap with $44.66K liquidity. Extreme volatility is inherent. The token can lose 80%+ of its value in hours given the thin order book and sell-dominated flow.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Only $44.66K in total liquidity. A single sell order of $5K+ would cause significant price impact. Exit risk is very high for any position above a few hundred dollars.

  • Concentrationhigh

    Top holder data is entirely unavailable. With 36 original holders sitting dormant for 30 days, it is highly probable that a small number of wallets control a large portion of supply. Cannot be verified due to missing data.

  • Sniper Dumpmedium

    No sniper data is available. However, the 30-day dormancy followed by a sudden pump strongly suggests the original 36 holders are distributing. 609 sellers vs 275 buyers supports this thesis.

  • Authorityhigh

    Update authority is 'unknown'. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be determined. Unverified contract. These unknowns represent material rug/manipulation risk.

Key risks

  • Extreme price volatility — 525% pump with 68.5% sell pressure suggests imminent reversal
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($44.66K) — high slippage and exit risk
  • Unknown update/mint/freeze authority — potential for rug pull or token manipulation
  • No top holder data — concentration risk cannot be assessed
  • 30 days of dormancy before pump — suggests coordinated pump rather than organic growth
  • Unverified contract with no audit
  • Sell volume ($101.35K) more than doubles buy volume ($46.65K) in 24h

Mitigating factors

  • Token metadata is marked 'Mutable: false', limiting metadata manipulation
  • Listed on PumpSwap, a known DEX with some baseline transparency
  • Social links (Twitter, website) exist, suggesting some level of project presence
  • Gaming/farming narrative could attract a niche community if product is legitimate
  • Holder count growth (36 → 387) shows some market interest, however speculative

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose completely. This is a very high risk micro-cap with all the hallmarks of a pump-and-dump event.

HLI (Hliland) is a newly viral micro-cap gaming token on Solana that experienced a 525% price spike after 30 days of complete dormancy. The bull case rests entirely on speculative momentum and an unverified gaming narrative. The bear case — which is more probable — is that this is a classic pump-and-dump with original holders distributing into retail demand. The base case is a sharp retracement followed by low-activity consolidation.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

HLI sustains momentum if the gaming product described in the metadata is real and launches, attracting a genuine community. Continued viral spread on social media could push FDV toward $1M+ given the low float. Early buyers who entered below $0.000029 could see 5–10x returns.

  • Verified game launch substantiating the 'grow crops, hunt monsters' narrative
  • Sustained organic holder growth beyond the initial pump wave
  • Influencer or KOL promotion driving new capital inflows
  • Liquidity deepening to reduce slippage and attract larger buyers

Base Case

HLI retraces 50–70% from peak within 24–72 hours as pump momentum fades. Holders stabilize in the 200–400 range. The token trades at low volumes with occasional speculative spikes. Without a product launch or major catalyst, it gradually loses relevance.

  • Sell pressure continues to dominate short-term
  • No major new catalyst (product launch, listing) emerges in the near term
  • Liquidity remains shallow, limiting recovery potential
  • The gaming narrative remains unverified

Bear Case

High probability

The pump reverses sharply as original 36 holders and early pump participants exit. Sell pressure (already 68.5%) overwhelms thin liquidity ($44.66K), causing a 70–90% price collapse back toward pre-pump levels (~$0.000019–$0.000029). The token returns to dormancy.

  • Dominant sell pressure (68.5%) and 2.2:1 seller-to-buyer ratio
  • Critically thin liquidity unable to absorb sell orders
  • No verified product, team, or utility to sustain demand
  • 30-day dormancy pattern suggests no organic community
  • Unknown authority status raises rug pull risk

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 19, 05:19 AM UTC

Data freshness

Price and trading data current as of analysis time. OHLC data covers 3 hourly candles ending ~05:00 UTC 2026-06-19. Historical holder data covers 2026-05-20 through 2026-06-18 (daily). Sniper data and top holder data are unavailable.

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (Solana mint: H3i1AwrZzubrni3quqaV74G6FSBiXyEtLq9fmnpqpump)
  • PumpSwap DEX trading analytics (pair: 4Tr8T9U4MHqngATWQJ868xf7XR9sdRBD5m9V7jzHHpbL)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (3 candles, 2026-06-19 03:00–05:00 UTC)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
  • Trading volume and buyer/seller analytics

Limitations

  • Only 3 OHLC candles available — technical analysis is severely limited
  • Top 20 holder data is entirely unavailable — concentration risk cannot be quantified
  • Sniper data is unavailable — early buyer behavior cannot be precisely assessed
  • Update authority is 'unknown' — mint/freeze authority status cannot be determined
  • Supply concentration metrics (top10=0%, top100=0%) appear to be data gaps, not genuine even distribution
  • The 6h and 24h price change fields show 0% which conflicts with the 525% 24h figure — possible data feed inconsistency
  • OHLC candle [1] contains an anomaly (Low > High) suggesting a data feed error
  • Token is unverified with no audit — on-chain claims cannot be independently validated

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research before making any investment decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Hliland (HLI)?

The token has already pumped 525% in 24h and is showing 68.5% sell pressure with 1,615 sells vs 865 buys. The OHLC data shows a sharp spike followed by a pullback candle (candle [2] closed lower than it opened). With only $44.66K in liquidity and a heavily sell-dominated order flow, a sharp retracement is the most probable short-term outcome. The 5m and 1h price changes (+58% and +134%) suggest the pump may still be in progress, but exhaustion signals are present. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000019 to $0.000085.

Is HLI a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose completely. This is a very high risk micro-cap with all the hallmarks of a pump-and-dump event.

How are HLI holders trending?

Hliland currently has 387 holders and is growing (24h: 351, 7d: 351, 30d: 351). The holder trend is technically 'growing' and 'accelerating' but this is entirely driven by a single speculative pump event, not organic adoption. For 30 consecutive days, the token had exactly 36 holders with zero net change — indicating complete dormancy. The sudden +351 holder surge in 24h (36 → 387) is almost entirely via swaps (379 of 387 total holders acquired via swap). This pattern is consistent with a pump event attracting speculative retail traders rather than genuine community building. The 7d and 30d growth figures are identical to the 24h figure, confirming all growth occurred in the last 24 hours. Sustainability of this holder growth is highly questionable given the dominant sell pressure.

What does sniper activity look like for HLI?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding HLI?

Extreme price volatility — 525% pump with 68.5% sell pressure suggests imminent reversal • Critically shallow liquidity ($44.66K) — high slippage and exit risk • Unknown update/mint/freeze authority — potential for rug pull or token manipulation

← Back to all predictions

Track HLI