Puso

Puso Prediction

Puso
Solana
AI Analysis
Apr 30, 04:47 AM

H7vtw9tdqVKSVdjg7TnZMk4NtcewhN5Y47AhA8vHpump

$0.0000223673

+16.24%

FDV $22,367

FDV

$22,367

Liquidity

$10,771

Holders

237

Snipers

26

Risk

Very High

Overview

Puso (PUSO) is a PumpFun-launched meme token on Solana with a total supply of ~999.99M tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$22,367. Deployed via j7tracker.io, the token launched on or around April 29, 2026, experiencing a sharp price spike followed by a significant retracement. The token is extremely early-stage, with only 237 holders, ultra-thin liquidity of ~$10.77K, and heavy sell pressure (66.8% sell volume). While holder count surged +232 in a single day, the token exhibits classic pump-and-dump risk patterns including high supply concentration, active sniper presence, and a price already down ~68% from its 24h high.

Key differentiators

  • Explosive single-day holder growth: +232 holders (88%) on April 29, 2026 from a base of just 33
  • Price peaked near $0.0000742 and has retraced ~70% to current ~$0.0000224, suggesting a post-pump bleed
  • Top holder (address 94eBGn...) holds 26.39% of supply — likely the PumpSwap liquidity pool
  • 20 identified snipers with majority in profit, indicating early buyer advantage over late entrants
  • Sell pressure dominates at 66.8% of 24h volume ($180.65K sells vs $89.94K buys)

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

Price is in a clear downtrend from the April 29 peak of ~$0.0000742. The most recent candle (04:00 UTC) closed at $0.0000221, down from the session high of $0.0000258. With 66.8% sell pressure, thin liquidity ($10.77K), and snipers actively taking profits, further downside is the path of least resistance. A brief relief bounce is possible given the +15.7% 1h move, but the macro trend remains bearish.

Target low$0.0000150
Target high$0.0000280
Support: $0.0000178 (candle [1] low / candle [4] close), $0.0000143 (candle [3] low — 24h absolute low), $0.0000175 (candle [24] low)
Resistance: $0.0000258 (candle [1] high / recent session high), $0.0000320 (candle [6] high / candle [24] open), $0.0000497 (candle [8] high / mid-range resistance)

Medium term

bearish
3–14 days

Without a new catalyst or significant buy-side accumulation, the token is likely to continue bleeding from its peak. The holder base is tiny (237), liquidity is extremely shallow, and the token has no verified contract or disclosed utility. A recovery above $0.0000500 would require sustained buy pressure that is not currently evident.

Catalysts
  • Viral social media attention (Twitter/website listed in metadata)
  • New exchange listing or partnership announcement
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Coordinated community buy campaign

Bullish factors

  • Strong single-day holder growth (+232, +88%) signals viral interest
  • +15.7% price recovery in the most recent 1h candle
  • 24h buy count of 1,636 shows active participation
  • Some snipers still holding (e.g., HvFdDWS3 with $40 balance), suggesting not all early buyers have exited
  • Token deployed on PumpSwap with an active pair

Bearish factors

  • Price down ~70% from 24h high of $0.0000742
  • 66.8% sell pressure ($180.65K sells vs $89.94K buys)
  • Ultra-thin liquidity of only $10.77K — any moderate sell order causes severe slippage
  • Top 10 holders control 49.06% of supply; top 100 control 98.53%
  • Most snipers are in profit and have already sold significant amounts
  • No verified contract, unknown update authority, mutable=false but metadata trust is low
  • Token was dormant for ~29 days (33 holders from March 31 to April 28) before sudden activity
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the token's extremely short trading history (launched ~April 29, 2026), ultra-thin liquidity making price highly manipulable, missing sniper cost-basis data, and the inherently unpredictable nature of meme token price action. All price targets are highly speculative.

Technical Analysis (OHLC)

The 24-hour OHLC series reveals a classic pump-and-dump pattern. Price launched from ~$0.0000175 (candle [24] low) and surged to a peak of $0.0000742 at candle [20] (09:00 UTC April 29). From that peak, price made a series of lower highs and lower lows: $0.0000742 → $0.0000657 → $0.0000549 → $0.0000499 → $0.0000288 → $0.0000258 (current session high). The most recent candle [1] shows a recovery attempt (O:$0.0000185, H:$0.0000258, C:$0.0000221) after the prior candle [2] printed a lower low at $0.0000143. Volume peaked at candles [22–23] ($28.6K and $60.6K) during the initial pump and has since declined sharply, confirming distribution.

Short-term trend
downtrend
Medium-term trend
downtrend
Momentumoversold
Volume trenddecreasing
Buy pressure33.2%
Sell pressure66.8%

Both short-term and medium-term trends are bearish. The token peaked at $0.0000742 approximately 19 hours ago and has been making consistent lower highs and lower lows since. The brief +15.7% 1h bounce does not yet constitute a trend reversal — it is likely a dead-cat bounce within the broader downtrend.

Immediate support$0.0000178 (candle [1] low / candle [4] close area)
Major support$0.0000143 (candle [3] absolute 24h low)
Immediate resistance$0.0000258 (candle [1] high / recent session high)
Major resistance$0.0000499 (candle [8] high / mid-distribution zone)

The $0.0000178–$0.0000143 zone represents the strongest near-term support, having been tested multiple times in candles [2]–[4]. The $0.0000258 level is immediate resistance from the most recent candle high. A reclaim of $0.0000320 (candle [6] high) would be needed to suggest any meaningful recovery. The all-time high of $0.0000742 is distant major resistance.

Notable patterns

  • Pump-and-dump price structure: parabolic rise followed by sustained lower highs/lower lows
  • High-volume distribution candles at peak (candles [18–22]) with declining volume on descent
  • Potential dead-cat bounce: candle [2] printed the 24h low ($0.0000143) followed by candle [1] recovering to $0.0000221
  • Candle [11] shows a massive wick from $0.0000548 down to $0.0000195 — classic distribution/shakeout candle
  • Candle [23] was the highest-volume candle ($60.6K) and coincided with the initial breakout — classic 'buy the news, sell the event' setup

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

medium confidence
High risk

Of the 20 identified snipers, 17 show positive realized PnL percentages, with gains ranging from +0.4% to +104.4%. Only 2 snipers (BS7kab at -17.1% and 4ujPne at -28.1%) are at a loss. The high sell-through rate and predominantly profitable sniper exits confirm that early buyers have been actively distributing into retail demand. The largest sniper exit was $5,684 at +82.1% PnL (AgmLJBMDCqWy). This pattern strongly suggests smart money has already taken profits, leaving later buyers holding depreciating positions.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration2.00%
PnL stateMostly In Profit
Sell-through rateHigh
Profit-taking risk
high

Only sniper [1] (HvFdDWS3) has a known remaining balance of $40. The majority of the 20 snipers have sold significant portions: sniper [16] (AgmLJBMDCqWy) sold $5,684 at +82.1% PnL; sniper [15] (Ar2Y6o1Q) sold $1,089 at +34.3%; sniper [11] (2tgUbS9U) sold $903 at +67.9%. Combined known sold value exceeds $14K across 20 snipers.

Early buyers (snipers) are overwhelmingly in profit and have been actively selling. The high realized PnL percentages (median ~35%) indicate snipers entered at very low prices during the first 1,000 blocks and have been distributing into the pump. Sentiment among early buyers is 'exit mode' rather than accumulation.

Holder Trends

growing
Total holders237
24h Δ160
7d Δ204
30d Δ204
Accelerating?Yes

Correlation with price: Holder growth is strongly correlated with the price pump. The token had exactly 33 holders from March 31 through April 28 (29 days of zero growth), then exploded to 265 holders on April 29 (+232, +88%) coinciding with the price spike to $0.0000742. This suggests the holder surge was driven by the price pump attracting new buyers, not organic community growth preceding price action. Current holders (237) are slightly below the April 29 peak (265), suggesting some early buyers have already exited.

The holder history is stark: 33 holders for 29 consecutive days (April 1–28), then a single-day explosion of +232 holders on April 29 coinciding with the price pump. The 7d and 30d growth figures are identical (both +204, +86%) because all growth occurred within the last 2 days. The 24h growth of +160 (68%) reflects continued onboarding even as price retraces. However, the current holder count of 237 vs the April 29 peak of 265 suggests ~28 holders have already exited. Growth is technically 'accelerating' from zero, but this is entirely pump-driven rather than organic.

Whale Map

Very Concentrated
Top 10 hold49.06%
Top 100 hold98.53%
SentimentDistributing

Notable holders

  • 94eBGnCfMwxRVSFN3N9vENZGmr45cMKnUJaG1Hx8WMUe

    DEX Liquidity Pool (PumpSwap pair address matches trading pair 94eBGn...)

    26.39%
  • 8fSnLTnRViK83dDesivTsPx2wiRhwti9xoafeMGjEyLJ

    Individual whale / early holder

    3.08%
  • H84Wda2aSgKV1daCVV9ozWrSurjVnoSLY5GAymYArGPg

    Individual whale / early holder

    3.07%
  • VJSDW6S74YXR4rRR9P4xwhMvLZJQMhrUb8XMFirUsy1

    Individual whale / early holder

    2.95%
  • 47Hc4kcfG2JfQs2Hsnh7EsAaL932QEJ9v9vbG8xTfdPp

    Individual whale / early holder

    2.54%

Supply concentration is extreme: the top 10 holders control 49.06% and the top 100 control 98.53% of supply, leaving only ~1.47% distributed beyond the top 100. The largest single holder (94eBGn... at 26.39%) matches the PumpSwap trading pair address, meaning it is the liquidity pool — not a whale accumulating. Excluding the LP, the next 9 holders each control 2.03%–3.08%, totaling ~22.67% of supply. The distribution pattern across holders #2–#20 shows relatively even sizing (2–3% each), which could indicate either coordinated wallets or natural distribution among early buyers. Given the active sell pressure and sniper profit-taking, overall whale sentiment is classified as distributing.

Liquidity & Market Health

Liquidity$10,770
DepthShallow
Slippage risk
high
24h Buy volume$89,940
24h Sell volume$180,650
Net flow
outflow
24h Unique buyers327
24h Unique sellers1,093

Market health is poor. Total liquidity of only $10,770 on PumpSwap is critically thin — the 24h trading volume of ~$270K is approximately 25x the available liquidity, meaning any significant order will cause severe price impact. The sell-to-buy ratio is heavily skewed: 3,073 sell transactions vs 1,636 buy transactions, and 1,093 unique sellers vs 327 unique buyers. Net flow is strongly negative (outflow), with $180.65K in sells vs $89.94K in buys — a 2:1 sell-to-buy ratio by volume. The FDV of ~$20.37K vs $10.77K liquidity means the liquidity-to-FDV ratio is ~53%, which is unusually high for a meme token but reflects the extremely low market cap rather than genuine liquidity depth. Slippage risk is high for any trade above ~$500.

Tokenomics & Authorities

Authority risk: Unknown
Total supply999,988,622.51
Fully diluted valuation$22,367
Mint authority renouncedunknown
Freeze authority renouncedunknown

The token has a total supply of ~999.99M (effectively 1 billion), consistent with standard PumpFun/PumpSwap launches. The FDV is ~$22,367 at current prices, reflecting the post-pump price level. Update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and the token is marked as 'mutable: false', which is a positive signal suggesting metadata cannot be changed. However, mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the provided data — these are critical unknowns for rug risk assessment. The token was deployed via j7tracker.io (not directly via pump.fun), which adds an additional layer of uncertainty. The contract is unverified and 'possible spam' is flagged as false. Without explicit confirmation of renounced mint/freeze authorities, rug risk from authorities must be classified as unknown.

Risk Assessment

Very High
Score: 9.1/100
Volatility
high

Price dropped ~70% from its 24h high of $0.0000742 to the current $0.0000224 within hours of launch. The token has demonstrated extreme intraday volatility with candle ranges of 50%+ in a single hour (e.g., candle [11]: H $0.0000548, L $0.0000195).

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity is only $10,770 on a single PumpSwap pool. Any sell order above ~$500 will cause significant slippage. There are no secondary markets or CEX listings. Exiting a meaningful position is extremely difficult without moving the price substantially.

Concentration
high

Top 10 holders control 49.06% of supply; top 100 control 98.53%. Excluding the LP (26.39%), the remaining top holders each control 2–3%, creating significant dump risk if coordinated. Only ~1.47% of supply is distributed beyond the top 100 wallets.

SniperDump
high

20 identified snipers, 17 of whom are in profit (realized PnL ranging from +0.4% to +104.4%). The largest sniper sold $5,684 at +82.1% profit. High sell-through rate confirms active distribution by early buyers into retail demand. Remaining sniper positions represent ongoing dump risk.

Authority
medium

Mint and freeze authority status are unknown. The token is marked mutable:false which is positive, but update authority is listed as unknown. Deployed via third-party tool (j7tracker.io) rather than directly via pump.fun. Contract is unverified. These unknowns elevate authority risk to medium.

Key risks

  • Ultra-thin liquidity ($10.77K) makes exit extremely difficult and price highly manipulable
  • 70% price decline from 24h peak with continued sell pressure dominance (66.8%)
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — potential for supply inflation or account freezing
  • Sniper concentration with 17/20 in profit — ongoing distribution pressure
  • Token was dormant for 29 days before sudden activity — suggests coordinated launch timing
  • Unverified contract deployed via third-party tool (j7tracker.io)
  • Top 100 holders control 98.53% of supply — extreme concentration
  • No disclosed utility, roadmap, or team information beyond social links

Mitigating factors

  • Token marked as mutable:false, reducing metadata manipulation risk
  • Possible spam flagged as false by data provider
  • Active social presence (Twitter, website, Moralis listed)
  • Rapid holder growth (+232 in one day) shows genuine market interest
  • PumpSwap listing provides at least some on-chain liquidity and price discovery
  • FDV of ~$22K is extremely low, limiting absolute dollar loss for small positions
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand meme token dynamics and can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than a negligible amount of capital. Position sizing should be minimal given the extreme liquidity constraints.

Investment Thesis

Puso is a newly launched Solana meme token that experienced a classic pump-and-dump pattern on its launch day (April 29, 2026), surging to $0.0000742 before retracing ~70% to ~$0.0000224. The token has extremely thin liquidity, high supply concentration, active sniper distribution, and no disclosed utility. The investment case is purely speculative — a bet on renewed viral momentum against a backdrop of overwhelming sell pressure and structural weakness.

Bull case (low)

A second viral wave drives renewed buying interest, pushing the token back toward its all-time high of $0.0000742 or beyond. The low FDV (~$22K) means even modest capital inflows could produce outsized percentage gains. If the token gains traction on Crypto Twitter or is featured on meme coin aggregators, a 3–5x from current levels is mathematically achievable.

  • Viral social media campaign gaining traction on Twitter/Crypto Twitter
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all small-cap tokens
  • Coordinated community buy campaign or influencer promotion
  • Low FDV ($22K) making percentage gains achievable with small capital
  • Continued holder growth sustaining buy-side demand

Base case

The token stabilizes in the $0.0000150–$0.0000250 range as initial excitement fades, trading with low volume and gradually declining holder count as early buyers exit. Without new catalysts, the token slowly bleeds value over weeks, eventually becoming illiquid and effectively worthless.

  • No major new catalysts emerge in the near term
  • Sell pressure gradually normalizes but remains dominant
  • Liquidity remains thin, preventing significant price recovery
  • A small core community of holders remains but lacks capital to drive meaningful price action
  • Token avoids an immediate rug pull but also fails to develop genuine utility or community

Bear case (high)

Sell pressure continues to dominate, liquidity dries up further, and the token bleeds toward zero. With 17/20 snipers in profit and actively selling, top holders distributing, and no fundamental utility, the token could lose 80–95% of remaining value within days. The 29-day dormancy period before launch suggests this may be a coordinated pump-and-dump with no long-term support.

  • Continued sniper and whale distribution into thin liquidity
  • No new catalysts or community development to sustain interest
  • Ultra-thin liquidity ($10.77K) accelerating price decline on any sell pressure
  • Unknown authority status creating potential rug pull vector
  • Historical pattern: 29 days of zero activity before sudden pump suggests coordinated exit scheme

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for Puso (Puso)?

Price is in a clear downtrend from the April 29 peak of ~$0.0000742. The most recent candle (04:00 UTC) closed at $0.0000221, down from the session high of $0.0000258. With 66.8% sell pressure, thin liquidity ($10.77K), and snipers actively taking profits, further downside is the path of least resistance. A brief relief bounce is possible given the +15.7% 1h move, but the macro trend remains bearish. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.0000150 to $0.0000280.

Is Puso a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand meme token dynamics and can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than a negligible amount of capital. Position sizing should be minimal given the extreme liquidity constraints.

How are Puso holders trending?

Puso currently has 237 holders and is growing (24h: 160, 7d: 204, 30d: 204). The holder history is stark: 33 holders for 29 consecutive days (April 1–28), then a single-day explosion of +232 holders on April 29 coinciding with the price pump. The 7d and 30d growth figures are identical (both +204, +86%) because all growth occurred within the last 2 days. The 24h growth of +160 (68%) reflects continued onboarding even as price retraces. However, the current holder count of 237 vs the April 29 peak of 265 suggests ~28 holders have already exited. Growth is technically 'accelerating' from zero, but this is entirely pump-driven rather than organic.

What does sniper activity look like for Puso?

Snipers hold roughly 2.00% of supply with PnL state "mostly_in_profit" and sell-through rate "high". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding Puso?

Ultra-thin liquidity ($10.77K) makes exit extremely difficult and price highly manipulable • 70% price decline from 24h peak with continued sell pressure dominance (66.8%) • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — potential for supply inflation or account freezing

Methodology

GeneratedApr 30, 04:47 AM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 2026-04-30T04:00:00.000Z. Price and volume data is current to the most recent hourly candle.
Model confidencelow

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (Mint: H7vtw9tdqVKSVdjg7TnZMk4NtcewhN5Y47AhA8vHpump)
  • PumpSwap DEX pair data (94eBGnCfMwxRVSFN3N9vENZGmr45cMKnUJaG1Hx8WMUe)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (24 candles, April 29–30, 2026)
  • Trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets, price changes)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data (237 total holders)
  • Historical holder series (30 days daily)
  • Top 20 holder addresses and balances
  • Sniper analysis (20 snipers, first 1,000 blocks)
  • Moralis token API data

Limitations

  • Sniper cost-basis (total sniped USD) is unknown, preventing precise concentration percentage calculation
  • Mint and freeze authority status are unknown — cannot confirm rug risk from authorities
  • Update authority is listed as unknown — cannot assess metadata manipulation risk
  • Only 24 hours of OHLC data available — insufficient for medium-term technical analysis
  • Token has only ~1 day of meaningful trading history, making all predictions highly speculative
  • Holder classification (whale/shark/dolphin/fish) thresholds are not disclosed
  • No information on team, tokenomics allocation, or vesting schedules
  • Social link content not analyzed — Twitter/website claims unverified

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Meme tokens carry extreme risk of total loss. The analyst has no position in Puso. All price targets and probability assessments are speculative estimates based on limited on-chain data. Past price action is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.