dog on chain Price Today & AI Analysis

ONCHAINSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 13, 2026

$0.0₅3825

-8.79% 24h

Contract

Live

GeukSURCwLgjRzHiKEN4qZy6eHcDMt4JDXtNJs4EQgj8

Chain

Solana

Holders

291

Market cap

$3,823

At a $1M market cap, $ONCHAIN would be $0.001001 (262x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is ONCHAIN a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 28

Transfer fee

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 1% fee and the owner can still raise it.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token blocks a sell

Transfer fee

1%Every buy and sell · can be raised

Launch wallets hold

1.2%1 sniper, 3 insiders still holding

The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about ONCHAIN

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

GOWFGOWF$0.0₅2596-0.3%MC $2.6K

X AirX Air$0.0₅2190-1.8%MC $2.2K

UNOFFICIALUnofficial Official Coin$0.0₅2972-1.1%MC $2.9K

1DOGOne Dog Company$0.0₅2545+0.8%MC $2.5K

HimgajriaThe Black Bear$0.0₅4255-3.4%MC $4.3K

FrongusFrongus$0.000201+385.2%MC $193.5K

dog on chain: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-13 21:16 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$20,562.00

How concentrated is dog on chain ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling dog on chain?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is dog on chain liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-13 21:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $20,562.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-13 21:16 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 13, 09:16 PM UTC

FDV

$230,990

Liquidity

$20,562.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

ONCHAIN (dog on chain) is a Solana meme token trading on a Raydium CPMM pool with just $20.56K in total liquidity and a $230.99K fully diluted valuation. It has experienced an extreme +393.6% price surge over the past 24 hours, but the most recent hourly candle shows signs of rejection and fading volume after peaking near $0.000456. Significant data gaps — no holder/whale distribution data, no sniper data, and unknown mint/freeze authority status — prevent a full risk picture from being established.

Key points

Extremely thin liquidity ($20.56K) relative to 24h trading volume (~$843.84K combined) and FDV ($230.99K), creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Explosive +393.6% 24h price move followed by a clear intra-hour rejection/fade pattern, suggesting the rally may be losing steam
Critical data unavailable: no holder distribution, no sniper wallet analysis, and unknown mint/freeze authority renouncement status
Roughly balanced but slightly buy-skewed 24h flow (51.4% buy vs 48.6% sell pressure, 2,655 buyers vs 2,284 sellers)

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · next 1-6 hours

bearish

After a parabolic +393% 24h move and rejection from the $0.000456 high, the most recent candle shows a fade with declining volume and a -9.6% 5-minute drop, indicating short-term momentum is rolling over. Expect continued consolidation or pullback toward support unless fresh volume returns.

Target low

$0.000090

Target high

$0.000300

Support: $0.000226, $0.0000907
Resistance: $0.000404, $0.000456

Medium term · 1-3 days

neutral

Medium-term direction is uncertain given only three candles of data and no holder/sniper context. The token could either consolidate and attempt another leg up if buy pressure (currently 51.4%) persists, or continue fading if the parabolic move was driven by short-term speculation with thin liquidity.

Catalysts

Renewed buy volume returning to candle-2 levels (~$580K) could reignite upward momentum
Any large sell against the thin $20.56K liquidity pool could trigger a sharp downside cascade
Clarification of mint/freeze authority status could reduce or increase perceived rug risk and shift sentiment

Bullish factors

24h buy volume ($433.75K) exceeds sell volume ($410.09K) with more unique buyers (2,655) than sellers (2,284)
+393.6% 24h price appreciation shows strong recent demand and speculative interest

Bearish factors

Most recent hourly candle shows a bearish rejection and close near session lows after failing to hold the $0.000456 high
Extremely shallow $20.56K liquidity pool creates high risk of sharp downside moves on any meaningful sell pressure
Volume declined sharply (from $579.99K to $74.03K) in the latest candle, indicating fading buyer conviction
Unknown mint/freeze authority and contract verification status add unresolved rug-pull risk

Confidence: low. Only 3 hourly candles and no holder or sniper data are available, severely limiting the ability to establish reliable trend context, support/resistance validation, or distribution analysis. The token's extreme volatility and thin liquidity further reduce predictive reliability.

ONCHAIN call history

Full track record →

Sep 13bearish@ $0.000231

24h-82.7%

7d-91.0%

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: GeukSU...Qgj8
Total Supply: 999,993,440.10 ONCHAIN

Key Risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($20.56K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
Unverified mint/freeze authority status — cannot confirm rug-pull safeguards are in place
No holder distribution data available, preventing assessment of concentration/whale risk
Extreme short-term volatility (393% 24h, 24% 1h, -9.6% 5m) typical of speculative/meme-driven pumps that can reverse sharply

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (19:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000135, spiked to a high of $0.0001523, then sold off to a low of $0.0000091, closing at $0.0001265 — a huge-range volatile candle with heavy upper wick rejection. Candle 2 (20:00 UTC) opened at $0.0001265 and rallied strongly to a high of $0.000456 before pulling back to close at $0.0002947, forming a large bullish body with a long upper wick (rejection near highs) on the highest volume of the three candles ($579.99K). Candle 3 (21:00 UTc) opened at $0.0002947, made a lower high of $0.0004040, and closed lower at $0.0002310 near the candle's low ($0.0002266) — a bearish reversal candle on markedly lower volume ($74.03K), suggesting fading momentum after the parabolic move.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Medium-term (24h) trend is sharply up (+393.6%), but the most recent hourly candle shows a clear pullback/rejection from the $0.000456 high, with price now consolidating near $0.000231 — a short-term downtrend within a larger uptrend, typical of a parabolic move losing steam.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000226 (candle 3 low)

Major support

$0.0000907 (candle 1 low)

Immediate resistance

$0.000404 (candle 3 high)

Major resistance

$0.000456 (candle 2 high, 24h peak)

Price is currently trading near $0.000231, just above immediate support at the candle 3 low of $0.000226. A break below this could expose the deeper support zone near $0.0000907-0.0000135 established in candle 1. On the upside, the $0.000404-$0.000456 zone represents the recent high-volume resistance band that has already rejected price twice.

Notable patterns

Parabolic spike followed by upper-wick rejection (candle 2) — signals distribution near highs
Bearish reversal/fade candle (candle 3) closing near its low after failing to sustain new highs
Volume climax in candle 2 followed by sharp volume decline in candle 3, indicating waning buying interest
Extremely wide intra-hour ranges (up to ~15x from low to high) typical of a newly launched, thinly-liquid meme token

Liquidity

$20,562.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $20.56K is extremely shallow relative to the $230.99K FDV and the enormous 24h trading volume (~$843.84K combined buy+sell). This mismatch (>40x liquidity turnover in a day) signals a highly volatile, thinly-liquidified pool where even moderate-sized trades can produce large price swings and high slippage. Buy volume ($433.75K) slightly exceeds sell volume ($410.09K), giving a modest net inflow (51.4% buy pressure vs 48.6% sell pressure), and buyer count (2,655) exceeds seller count (2,284), suggesting more net accumulation activity than distribution over the past 24h. However, given the small liquidity base, this volume is likely driven by rapid, high-frequency speculative trading rather than durable demand.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,993,440.10 ONCHAIN

FDV

$230.99K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
24h price change of +393.6% with 1h swings of +24.4% and a 5m move of -9.6% indicates extreme volatility. Hourly candles show swings from lows of $0.0000091 to highs of $0.000456 within a single hour — a nearly 50x intra-candle range.
Liquidityhigh
Only $20.56K total liquidity against $230.99K FDV and hundreds of thousands in daily volume creates severe slippage risk and fragility; a modest sell could crater price.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($20.56K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
Unverified mint/freeze authority status — cannot confirm rug-pull safeguards are in place
No holder distribution data available, preventing assessment of concentration/whale risk
Extreme short-term volatility (393% 24h, 24% 1h, -9.6% 5m) typical of speculative/meme-driven pumps that can reverse sharply
Unknown contract verification and mutability status add uncertainty about underlying token contract integrity

Mitigating factors

24h buy volume ($433.75K) modestly exceeds sell volume ($410.09K), and buyer count exceeds seller count, suggesting net accumulation rather than a one-sided dump
Token trades on Raydium CPMM, a widely used and audited AMM program, reducing (but not eliminating) smart-contract execution risk at the DEX layer

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly speculative, risk-tolerant traders comfortable with total loss of capital. Not appropriate for risk-averse or long-term investors given the shallow liquidity, unverified authorities, missing holder data, and extreme volatility.

ONCHAIN (dog on chain) is a low-liquidity, high-volatility Solana meme token that has just experienced a parabolic +393.6% 24h price move on a Raydium CPMM pool with only $20.56K in total liquidity. The token shows signs of a speculative spike followed by an early-stage cooling/rejection pattern. Critical data gaps — no holder distribution data, no sniper data, and unknown mint/freeze authority status — significantly limit confidence in any directional call, and the extremely thin liquidity relative to trading volume and FDV ($230.99K) makes this a high-risk, high-reward speculative vehicle only.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buy-side momentum re-accelerates and new capital continues flowing in (buy volume already modestly exceeds sell volume with more unique buyers than sellers), the token could retest and break above the $0.000404-$0.000456 resistance zone, extending the meme-driven rally, especially if social attention (Twitter link present) grows.

Sustained or increasing buy volume above the $433.75K/24h level
Growing unique buyer count outpacing sellers
Viral social/community momentum on Twitter driving new speculative demand

Base Case

Price likely consolidates in a wide range between the immediate support (~$0.000226) and resistance (~$0.000404) as the market digests the initial parabolic spike, with continued high volatility and no clear durable trend until liquidity deepens or more data becomes available.

No major new liquidity is added to the pool in the short term
Buy/sell pressure remains roughly balanced (currently 51.4%/48.6%)
No confirmed rug-pull or authority-related incident occurs

Bear Case

High probability

Given the extremely thin $20.56K liquidity pool, unresolved authority/rug risk, and the clear volume-climax-then-fade pattern in the most recent candle, the token could see a sharp reversal or liquidity-driven collapse, especially if early buyers or unknown large holders begin taking profits into the still-elevated price.

Thin liquidity magnifying any sell pressure into large price drops
Fading volume and bearish rejection candle signaling momentum exhaustion
Unknown/unverified mint and freeze authorities leaving rug-pull risk unresolved
No holder data to rule out concentrated whale ownership that could dump on retail buyers

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 13, 09:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-13 21:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain price feed (USD)
OHLC hourly candle data (3 most recent candles)
Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price % change)
Token metadata (mint, supply, decimals, FDV)
Sniper analysis (unavailable/empty)

Limitations

Only 3 hourly OHLC candles provided, insufficient for robust technical trend analysis
No holder distribution/whale data available — holderTrends and whaleMap sections are empty placeholders
No sniper wallet data available — smart money signals largely unknown
Mint authority, freeze authority, contract verification, and mutability status all unknown, preventing a confident rug-risk assessment
Extremely low liquidity ($20.56K) makes price highly susceptible to manipulation and low-volume distortions

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain data provided, which contains significant gaps (no holder data, no sniper data, unknown authority status). Cryptocurrency trading, especially in low-liquidity meme tokens, carries a substantial risk of total capital loss. Conduct your own due diligence before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is dog on chain (ONCHAIN) a scam?

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 1% fee and the owner can still raise it. The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell dog on chain (ONCHAIN)?

Yes. Every buy and sell pays a 1% transfer fee, and the owner can still raise it. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is dog on chain ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling dog on chain?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is dog on chain liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-13 21:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $20,562.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for dog on chain (ONCHAIN)?

Is ONCHAIN a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly speculative, risk-tolerant traders comfortable with total loss of capital. Not appropriate for risk-averse or long-term investors given the shallow liquidity, unverified authorities, missing holder data, and extreme volatility.

What are the key risks of holding ONCHAIN?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($20.56K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential • Unverified mint/freeze authority status — cannot confirm rug-pull safeguards are in place • No holder distribution data available, preventing assessment of concentration/whale risk