How concentrated is GOWF ownership?

As of 2026-09-23 15:15 UTC, the top 10 addresses held 18.83% of supply, out of 2,830 holder addresses.

Are large holders selling GOWF?

In the 24 hours to 2026-09-23 15:15 UTC, DEX buys were $45,859.00 and sells $52,977.00; this report doesn't show which wallets sold.

Is GOWF liquidity falling?

Liquidity rose 47.32%, from $33,759.92 (2026-09-23 14:00 UTC) to $49,735.82 (2026-09-23 15:00 UTC).

GOWF Price Today & AI Analysis

GOWFSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 23, 2026

$0.0₅1878

+0.35% 24h

Contract

Live

GMsatc3SK9Y1GWeS9Brt1PutMYkbwb1fSc4V7NMoaRt

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,001

Market cap

$1,869

At a $1M market cap, $GOWF would be $0.001001 (533x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

GOWF support and resistance today

From 1-hour candles

Is GOWF a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 7

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. A few things to know below.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about GOWF

3 free answers a day

GOWF: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-23 15:15 UTC

Holder addresses

2,830

Top 10 supply share

18.83%

Reported liquidity

$67,809.00

How concentrated is GOWF ownership?: As of 2026-09-23 15:15 UTC, the top 10 addresses held 18.83% of supply, out of 2,830 holder addresses.
Are large holders selling GOWF?: In the 24 hours to 2026-09-23 15:15 UTC, DEX buys were $45,859.00 and sells $52,977.00; this report doesn't show which wallets sold.
Is GOWF liquidity falling?: Liquidity rose 47.32%, from $33,759.92 (2026-09-23 14:00 UTC) to $49,735.82 (2026-09-23 15:00 UTC).

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Unhosted token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-23 15:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)	Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-23 14:00 UTC	$33,759.92
2026-09-23 15:00 UTC	$49,735.82

A liquidity change compares the first and last samples, which may be less than 24 hours apart. USD liquidity also moves with asset prices, not only with deposits and withdrawals.

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

2026-09-23 15:15 UTCSell · $630.175mJcCjRc…EfqzebWallet UWh9j2zQ…dWeLRR
2026-09-23 15:15 UTCSell · $43.364kRybV5a…9GctTFWallet ALJdCigZ…T4t2c2
2026-09-23 15:15 UTCSell · $702.272bQFMTdq…3US3DwWallet JDvPcAq9…zNx2Vp
2026-09-23 15:15 UTCSell · $96.775w6RkVE2…JKSX2oWallet AL3jRDuU…mWZNxz
2026-09-23 15:15 UTCSell · $29.115i88hjr2…2Kgw2YWallet GUebr6n2…xmSppt
2026-09-23 15:15 UTCSell · $4.683wj1gNsL…RXeUeqWallet DGRPCs7g…LXPDaK
2026-09-23 15:15 UTCSell · $26.335B9H4wrH…N6HgvYWallet D99QSxDm…dgUjXQ
2026-09-23 15:15 UTCSell · $28.537ER4EADL…FoURmUWallet 8psNvWTr…raVRtf
2026-09-23 15:15 UTCSell · $8.053nPDeA4o…31sPcxWallet 5dxTSYb9…s3cRMJ
2026-09-23 15:15 UTCSell · $18.534LsJEkcw…XkxDaKWallet 25quup9D…Uzw3iq

Report snapshot

as of Sep 23, 03:16 PM UTC

FDV

$479,114

Liquidity

$67,809.00

Holders

2,830

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

GOWF is a very new/micro-cap Solana token trading on a single Raydium CPMM pool (pair EAz5gf9pgMjWq1DZBjshvkKBR3SrJxNfiZPb35Nut1YY) with a fully diluted valuation of roughly $479K and only $67.81K in total liquidity. The token has experienced an extreme, likely unsustainable price spike (+171.9% in the last 24h/1h window, with the most recent hourly candle showing a range from ~$0.0000087 to ~$0.000507) accompanied by heavy two-sided volume (~$45.86K buys vs ~$52.98K sells in 24h). Holder count sits at 2,830 addresses with the top 10 holding 18.83% of supply, but no historical holder data, wallet classification, sniper coverage, or mint/freeze authority status is available, leaving major due-diligence gaps.

Key points

Single-pool, low-liquidity ($67.81K) micro-cap with high volatility
Extreme short-term price move (+171.9%) on a single hourly candle range spanning two orders of magnitude
No sniper data, no authority (mint/freeze) verification, and no holder history available — significant transparency gaps
Balanced but elevated 24h buy/sell activity (546 buys vs 554 sells) suggesting active two-sided trading rather than one-directional accumulation

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-48 hours

neutral

The most recent hourly candle shows price whipsawing from a low of ~$0.0000087 to a high of ~$0.000507 before closing near $0.000479, indicating extreme volatility and a likely unstable base. With near 50/50 buy/sell volume split (46.4% buy vs 53.6% sell) and thin liquidity (~$67.81K), price could swing sharply in either direction on modest order flow. Short-term direction is uncertain given the parabolic move already realized.

Target low

$0.00028

Target high

$0.00060

Support: $0.000288 (recent candle low), $0.0000087 (extreme low, likely air-gap zone)
Resistance: $0.000507 (recent candle high), $0.000375 (prior candle high)

Medium term · 7-14 days

neutral

With only two hourly candles of data provided and no longer-term OHLC history, medium-term trend cannot be reliably established. The token's viability will likely hinge on whether liquidity deepens and whether the recent pump attracts sustained buyer interest or reverts sharply as is common with thinly-liquidated micro-caps.

Catalysts

Potential liquidity additions or removals from the single Raydium pool
Social media/twitter-driven speculative interest given listed social links
Broader Solana meme-token market sentiment
Risk of large holder(s) among the top 10 (18.83% of supply) distributing into strength

Bullish factors

Large realized 24h price gain (+171.9%) signals strong recent speculative demand
Buy count (546) nearly matches sell count (554), showing continued two-sided interest rather than one-sided dumping
Holder base of 2,830 addresses is not trivially small for a token at this market cap stage

Bearish factors

Extremely thin liquidity ($67.81K) relative to $479K FDV creates high slippage and manipulation risk
Sell volume (53.6%) modestly exceeds buy volume (46.4%) in the 24h window, a mild bearish tilt
Massive intra-candle range (low $0.0000087 to high $0.000507) suggests a possible wash-trade or manipulated pump, not organic price discovery
No mint/freeze authority verification available — rug risk cannot be ruled out

Confidence: low. Only two hourly OHLC candles were provided, liquidity is very thin ($67.81K), there is no sniper data, no holder history, and no verified authority status. This combination of sparse data and extreme volatility makes any price prediction highly speculative.

GOWF call history

Full track record →

Sep 23neutral@ $0.000479

24h—

7d—

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: GMsatc...oaRt
Total Supply: 999,999,375.92 GOWF

Key Risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($67.81K) relative to FDV ($479K), enabling high slippage and easy price manipulation
Parabolic, likely unsustainable price action (+171.9% with a 40-50x intra-hour candle range) typical of pump-and-dump patterns on new low-liquidity tokens
Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing by the deployer
No sniper coverage or holder history data available, preventing assessment of early-buyer dumping risk or organic holder growth

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only two hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (14:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000087, spiked to a high of $0.000375, dipped back to the open as its low, and closed at $0.000312 on very high volume (~$1.02M). Candle 2 (15:00 UTC) opened at $0.000312, pushed to a new high of $0.000507, pulled back to a low of $0.000288, and closed near the high at $0.000479 on much lower volume (~$280.6K). This pattern — a huge-range first candle followed by a smaller-range but still wide second candle closing near its high — suggests an initial explosive pump (possibly a launch or listing event) followed by continued but decelerating volatility.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term price action is up sharply from candle 1's open, with candle 2 closing near its high, but the extremely limited two-candle dataset makes it impossible to confirm a durable medium-term trend; effectively this looks like a single volatile launch/pump window rather than an established trend.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

46%

Sell

54%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000288 (candle 2 low)

Major support

$0.0000087 (candle 1 open/low, extreme air pocket)

Immediate resistance

$0.000507 (candle 2 high)

Major resistance

$0.000600 (round-number extension above recent high)

Support is poorly defined given only two candles; $0.000288 is the most recent tested low, while the $0.0000087 level represents an extreme low unlikely to be immediately relevant but shows how thin the order book is. Resistance sits at the recent high of $0.000507; a break above could target the psychological $0.0006 area, but any of these levels could be invalidated quickly given the pool's thin $67.81K liquidity.

Notable patterns

Large-range 'wick' candle in period 1 (low equals open, high 40x the low) typical of an initial pump/launch candle
Candle 2 shows a bullish close near its high after dipping, resembling a shallow pullback-and-recovery within an uptrend leg
Volume climax followed by sharp volume decay, consistent with a fading initial pump

Liquidity

$67,809.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $67.81K against a fully diluted valuation of $479.11K (a liquidity-to-FDV ratio under 15%) indicates a shallow, easily-moved market concentrated in a single Raydium CPMM pool. 24h volumes are fairly active for the pool size ($45.86K buys, 546 buy txns from 415 unique buyers vs $52.98K sells, 554 sell txns from 438 unique sellers), producing a mild net outflow (sells exceed buys by ~$7.1K, or 53.6% vs 46.4% of volume). This combination of thin liquidity and high transaction counts creates elevated slippage risk for any trade of meaningful size and raises the possibility of sharp price swings in either direction.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,999,375.92 GOWF

FDV

$479,114

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
24h price change of +171.9% and an hourly candle range spanning from $0.0000087 to $0.000507 (roughly a 40-50x intra-candle swing) demonstrate extreme volatility inconsistent with a mature, stable market.
Liquidityhigh
Only $67.81K in total liquidity against a $479K FDV means large trades can move the price significantly; slippage risk is rated high and the market depends on a single Raydium CPMM pool.
Concentrationmedium
Top 10 holders control 18.83% of supply per the current snapshot — a meaningful but not overwhelming concentration. Top-100 concentration and wallet classification are unavailable, so full concentration risk cannot be fully assessed; this figure alone understates true risk if larger cohorts hold more.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($67.81K) relative to FDV ($479K), enabling high slippage and easy price manipulation
Parabolic, likely unsustainable price action (+171.9% with a 40-50x intra-hour candle range) typical of pump-and-dump patterns on new low-liquidity tokens
Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing by the deployer
No sniper coverage or holder history data available, preventing assessment of early-buyer dumping risk or organic holder growth
Net negative volume flow in the last 24h (53.6% sell vs 46.4% buy) despite the price closing higher, hinting at possible distribution into the rally

Mitigating factors

A holder base of 2,830 addresses suggests some distribution beyond a handful of wallets, though this cannot be independently classified
Top-10 concentration of 18.83% is not in the most extreme range seen in freshly launched tokens
Continued two-sided trading activity (546 buys vs 554 sells, 415 vs 438 unique traders) shows the market has not simply collapsed to zero liquidity

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total capital loss. Given the shallow liquidity, extreme volatility, unresolved authority risk, and missing sniper/holder-history data, this is not appropriate for conservative or long-term investors, and any position should be sized as high-risk speculative capital only.

GOWF is a newly volatile, thinly-liquidated Solana micro-cap that has just posted an extreme short-term price spike on declining volume, with major transparency gaps (unknown mint/freeze authorities, no sniper data, no holder history). Any investment thesis here is purely speculative and short-term in nature, resting on continued speculative momentum rather than fundamentals.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If speculative/social-media-driven interest (the token lists twitter and website links) continues and new liquidity flows into the pool, price could extend gains toward the $0.0006+ area, especially if buy pressure re-accelerates above the current 46.4% share.

Sustained or renewed social media attention driving fresh buyer inflows
Additional liquidity provisioning reducing slippage and attracting larger buyers
Broader Solana meme-token market strength lifting correlated speculative assets

Base Case

Price likely continues to be highly volatile and range-bound between roughly $0.00029 and $0.00051 in the near term as the market digests the initial pump, with directional resolution depending heavily on whether new liquidity and buyers materialize or whether early holders take profits.

No major liquidity injections or removals occur in the immediate term
Trading activity remains roughly balanced between buyers and sellers as seen in the 24h data (546 buys/554 sells)
No new information emerges on mint/freeze authority status or sniper positioning that would materially shift risk perception

Bear Case

High probability

Given the parabolic move, decaying volume (from ~$1.02M to ~$280.6K between the two candles), and a mild net-sell skew (53.6% sell vs 46.4% buy) in 24h, the token could see a sharp reversion toward or below the candle 2 low of $0.000288, particularly if any of the top-10 holders (18.83% of supply) or unidentified early buyers exit.

Profit-taking by early/large holders into the recent price strength
Shallow $67.81K liquidity amplifying any sell pressure into a rapid price collapse
Absence of confirmed mint/freeze authority renouncement, leaving open a rug-pull or supply-dilution scenario
Typical pump-and-dump lifecycle pattern seen in low-liquidity, high-volatility new tokens

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 23, 03:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-23 15:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
USD price and 24h change data
Two most recent hourly OHLC candles from Raydium CPMM pair
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, counts, unique buyers/sellers)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)
Unhosted holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count and top-10 concentration)

Limitations

Only two hourly OHLC candles were available, severely limiting technical trend analysis
No sniper data was provided, preventing assessment of sniper concentration, PnL, or dump risk
No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) or wallet classification data was available, preventing whale/accumulation analysis beyond a single top-10 concentration figure
Mint authority, freeze authority, and contract verification status were all unknown, preventing a definitive rug-risk assessment from authorities
Total liquidity and volume figures are point-in-time and can change rapidly given the token's demonstrated volatility

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain and market data that may be inaccurate, delayed, or manipulated by adversarial actors. All figures should be independently verified. Cryptocurrency trading, especially in low-liquidity micro-cap tokens, carries a high risk of substantial or total loss. Do your own research before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is GOWF a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. A few things to know below. The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply. Checked Nov 7, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell GOWF?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 7, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

Where are GOWF support and resistance today?

GOWF trades at $0.000001878 as of Nov 7, 22:04 UTC, +0.4% in 24 hours. No swing low under the price in the last 8 days; the 30-day low is $0.000001872 (0.3% below). No swing high over the price in the last 8 days; the 30-day high is $0.000003146 (67% above). Levels come from the token's own 1-hour candles: the swing highs and lows of the last 8 days, merged where they sit close together, plus the 30-day low and high. They show where the price turned before, not where it will go.

What is the short-term price outlook for GOWF (GOWF)?

Is GOWF a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 85/100. This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total capital loss. Given the shallow liquidity, extreme volatility, unresolved authority risk, and missing sniper/holder-history data, this is not appropriate for conservative or long-term investors, and any position should be sized as high-risk speculative capital only.

What are the key risks of holding GOWF?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($67.81K) relative to FDV ($479K), enabling high slippage and easy price manipulation • Parabolic, likely unsustainable price action (+171.9% with a 40-50x intra-hour candle range) typical of pump-and-dump patterns on new low-liquidity tokens • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing by the deployer