GOWF

GOWF Price Today & AI Analysis

GOWFSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 23, 2026

Price

$0.000479

+171.89% 24h · FDV $479,114

Contract

Live
GMsatc3SK9Y1GWeS9Brt1PutMYkbwb1fSc4V7NMoaRt

Chain

Solana

Holders

2,830

Market cap

$479,114

More tokens on Solana

TACZTACZTACZ$0.000935+5.6%MC $934.9KVerityVerityVerity$0.047357+224.6%MC $71.2KTSUKITSUKITsuki$0.005265+2.7%MC $5.00MUUSOUnited States Oil Fund, LP - Backpack Securities$144.45-4.0%MC $207.3KVINEVINEVine Coin$0.008218+4.0%MC $8.22MSTONKSTONKSTONK$0.3161-4.3%MC $260.36M

GOWF: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-23 15:15 UTC

Holder addresses

2,830

Top 10 supply share

18.83%

Reported liquidity

$67,809.00
How concentrated is GOWF ownership?
As of 2026-09-23 15:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 18.83% of supply. It reports 2,830 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling GOWF?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-23 15:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $45,859.00 in buys and $52,977.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is GOWF liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +47.32%, from $33,759.92 (2026-09-23 14:00 UTC) to $49,735.82 (2026-09-23 15:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-23 15:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-23 14:00 UTC$33,759.92
2026-09-23 15:00 UTC$49,735.82

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about GOWF

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 23, 03:16 PM UTC

FDV

$479,114

Liquidity

$67,809.00

Holders

2,830

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

GOWF is a very new/micro-cap Solana token trading on a single Raydium CPMM pool (pair EAz5gf9pgMjWq1DZBjshvkKBR3SrJxNfiZPb35Nut1YY) with a fully diluted valuation of roughly $479K and only $67.81K in total liquidity. The token has experienced an extreme, likely unsustainable price spike (+171.9% in the last 24h/1h window, with the most recent hourly candle showing a range from ~$0.0000087 to ~$0.000507) accompanied by heavy two-sided volume (~$45.86K buys vs ~$52.98K sells in 24h). Holder count sits at 2,830 addresses with the top 10 holding 18.83% of supply, but no historical holder data, wallet classification, sniper coverage, or mint/freeze authority status is available, leaving major due-diligence gaps.

Key points

  • Single-pool, low-liquidity ($67.81K) micro-cap with high volatility
  • Extreme short-term price move (+171.9%) on a single hourly candle range spanning two orders of magnitude
  • No sniper data, no authority (mint/freeze) verification, and no holder history available — significant transparency gaps
  • Balanced but elevated 24h buy/sell activity (546 buys vs 554 sells) suggesting active two-sided trading rather than one-directional accumulation

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-48 hours

neutral

The most recent hourly candle shows price whipsawing from a low of ~$0.0000087 to a high of ~$0.000507 before closing near $0.000479, indicating extreme volatility and a likely unstable base. With near 50/50 buy/sell volume split (46.4% buy vs 53.6% sell) and thin liquidity (~$67.81K), price could swing sharply in either direction on modest order flow. Short-term direction is uncertain given the parabolic move already realized.

Target low

$0.00028

Target high

$0.00060

Support

$0.000288 (recent candle low), $0.0000087 (extreme low, likely air-gap zone)

Resistance

$0.000507 (recent candle high), $0.000375 (prior candle high)

Medium term · 7-14 days

neutral

With only two hourly candles of data provided and no longer-term OHLC history, medium-term trend cannot be reliably established. The token's viability will likely hinge on whether liquidity deepens and whether the recent pump attracts sustained buyer interest or reverts sharply as is common with thinly-liquidated micro-caps.

Catalysts

  • Potential liquidity additions or removals from the single Raydium pool
  • Social media/twitter-driven speculative interest given listed social links
  • Broader Solana meme-token market sentiment
  • Risk of large holder(s) among the top 10 (18.83% of supply) distributing into strength

Bullish factors

  • Large realized 24h price gain (+171.9%) signals strong recent speculative demand
  • Buy count (546) nearly matches sell count (554), showing continued two-sided interest rather than one-sided dumping
  • Holder base of 2,830 addresses is not trivially small for a token at this market cap stage

Bearish factors

  • Extremely thin liquidity ($67.81K) relative to $479K FDV creates high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Sell volume (53.6%) modestly exceeds buy volume (46.4%) in the 24h window, a mild bearish tilt
  • Massive intra-candle range (low $0.0000087 to high $0.000507) suggests a possible wash-trade or manipulated pump, not organic price discovery
  • No mint/freeze authority verification available — rug risk cannot be ruled out

Confidence: low. Only two hourly OHLC candles were provided, liquidity is very thin ($67.81K), there is no sniper data, no holder history, and no verified authority status. This combination of sparse data and extreme volatility makes any price prediction highly speculative.

GOWF call history

Full track record →

Sep 23neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
GMsatc...oaRt
Total Supply
999,999,375.92 GOWF

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($67.81K) relative to FDV ($479K), enabling high slippage and easy price manipulation
  • Parabolic, likely unsustainable price action (+171.9% with a 40-50x intra-hour candle range) typical of pump-and-dump patterns on new low-liquidity tokens
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing by the deployer
  • No sniper coverage or holder history data available, preventing assessment of early-buyer dumping risk or organic holder growth

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only two hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (14:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000087, spiked to a high of $0.000375, dipped back to the open as its low, and closed at $0.000312 on very high volume (~$1.02M). Candle 2 (15:00 UTC) opened at $0.000312, pushed to a new high of $0.000507, pulled back to a low of $0.000288, and closed near the high at $0.000479 on much lower volume (~$280.6K). This pattern — a huge-range first candle followed by a smaller-range but still wide second candle closing near its high — suggests an initial explosive pump (possibly a launch or listing event) followed by continued but decelerating volatility.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term price action is up sharply from candle 1's open, with candle 2 closing near its high, but the extremely limited two-candle dataset makes it impossible to confirm a durable medium-term trend; effectively this looks like a single volatile launch/pump window rather than an established trend.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

46%

Sell

54%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000288 (candle 2 low)

Major support

$0.0000087 (candle 1 open/low, extreme air pocket)

Immediate resistance

$0.000507 (candle 2 high)

Major resistance

$0.000600 (round-number extension above recent high)

Support is poorly defined given only two candles; $0.000288 is the most recent tested low, while the $0.0000087 level represents an extreme low unlikely to be immediately relevant but shows how thin the order book is. Resistance sits at the recent high of $0.000507; a break above could target the psychological $0.0006 area, but any of these levels could be invalidated quickly given the pool's thin $67.81K liquidity.

Notable patterns

  • Large-range 'wick' candle in period 1 (low equals open, high 40x the low) typical of an initial pump/launch candle
  • Candle 2 shows a bullish close near its high after dipping, resembling a shallow pullback-and-recovery within an uptrend leg
  • Volume climax followed by sharp volume decay, consistent with a fading initial pump

Liquidity

Liquidity

$67,809.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $67.81K against a fully diluted valuation of $479.11K (a liquidity-to-FDV ratio under 15%) indicates a shallow, easily-moved market concentrated in a single Raydium CPMM pool. 24h volumes are fairly active for the pool size ($45.86K buys, 546 buy txns from 415 unique buyers vs $52.98K sells, 554 sell txns from 438 unique sellers), producing a mild net outflow (sells exceed buys by ~$7.1K, or 53.6% vs 46.4% of volume). This combination of thin liquidity and high transaction counts creates elevated slippage risk for any trade of meaningful size and raises the possibility of sharp price swings in either direction.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,999,375.92 GOWF

FDV

$479,114

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change of +171.9% and an hourly candle range spanning from $0.0000087 to $0.000507 (roughly a 40-50x intra-candle swing) demonstrate extreme volatility inconsistent with a mature, stable market.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Only $67.81K in total liquidity against a $479K FDV means large trades can move the price significantly; slippage risk is rated high and the market depends on a single Raydium CPMM pool.

  • Concentrationmedium

    Top 10 holders control 18.83% of supply per the current snapshot — a meaningful but not overwhelming concentration. Top-100 concentration and wallet classification are unavailable, so full concentration risk cannot be fully assessed; this figure alone understates true risk if larger cohorts hold more.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($67.81K) relative to FDV ($479K), enabling high slippage and easy price manipulation
  • Parabolic, likely unsustainable price action (+171.9% with a 40-50x intra-hour candle range) typical of pump-and-dump patterns on new low-liquidity tokens
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing by the deployer
  • No sniper coverage or holder history data available, preventing assessment of early-buyer dumping risk or organic holder growth
  • Net negative volume flow in the last 24h (53.6% sell vs 46.4% buy) despite the price closing higher, hinting at possible distribution into the rally

Mitigating factors

  • A holder base of 2,830 addresses suggests some distribution beyond a handful of wallets, though this cannot be independently classified
  • Top-10 concentration of 18.83% is not in the most extreme range seen in freshly launched tokens
  • Continued two-sided trading activity (546 buys vs 554 sells, 415 vs 438 unique traders) shows the market has not simply collapsed to zero liquidity

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total capital loss. Given the shallow liquidity, extreme volatility, unresolved authority risk, and missing sniper/holder-history data, this is not appropriate for conservative or long-term investors, and any position should be sized as high-risk speculative capital only.

GOWF is a newly volatile, thinly-liquidated Solana micro-cap that has just posted an extreme short-term price spike on declining volume, with major transparency gaps (unknown mint/freeze authorities, no sniper data, no holder history). Any investment thesis here is purely speculative and short-term in nature, resting on continued speculative momentum rather than fundamentals.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If speculative/social-media-driven interest (the token lists twitter and website links) continues and new liquidity flows into the pool, price could extend gains toward the $0.0006+ area, especially if buy pressure re-accelerates above the current 46.4% share.

  • Sustained or renewed social media attention driving fresh buyer inflows
  • Additional liquidity provisioning reducing slippage and attracting larger buyers
  • Broader Solana meme-token market strength lifting correlated speculative assets

Base Case

Price likely continues to be highly volatile and range-bound between roughly $0.00029 and $0.00051 in the near term as the market digests the initial pump, with directional resolution depending heavily on whether new liquidity and buyers materialize or whether early holders take profits.

  • No major liquidity injections or removals occur in the immediate term
  • Trading activity remains roughly balanced between buyers and sellers as seen in the 24h data (546 buys/554 sells)
  • No new information emerges on mint/freeze authority status or sniper positioning that would materially shift risk perception

Bear Case

High probability

Given the parabolic move, decaying volume (from ~$1.02M to ~$280.6K between the two candles), and a mild net-sell skew (53.6% sell vs 46.4% buy) in 24h, the token could see a sharp reversion toward or below the candle 2 low of $0.000288, particularly if any of the top-10 holders (18.83% of supply) or unidentified early buyers exit.

  • Profit-taking by early/large holders into the recent price strength
  • Shallow $67.81K liquidity amplifying any sell pressure into a rapid price collapse
  • Absence of confirmed mint/freeze authority renouncement, leaving open a rug-pull or supply-dilution scenario
  • Typical pump-and-dump lifecycle pattern seen in low-liquidity, high-volatility new tokens

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 23, 03:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-23 15:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
  • USD price and 24h change data
  • Two most recent hourly OHLC candles from Raydium CPMM pair
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, counts, unique buyers/sellers)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count and top-10 concentration)

Limitations

  • Only two hourly OHLC candles were available, severely limiting technical trend analysis
  • No sniper data was provided, preventing assessment of sniper concentration, PnL, or dump risk
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) or wallet classification data was available, preventing whale/accumulation analysis beyond a single top-10 concentration figure
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, and contract verification status were all unknown, preventing a definitive rug-risk assessment from authorities
  • Total liquidity and volume figures are point-in-time and can change rapidly given the token's demonstrated volatility

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain and market data that may be inaccurate, delayed, or manipulated by adversarial actors. All figures should be independently verified. Cryptocurrency trading, especially in low-liquidity micro-cap tokens, carries a high risk of substantial or total loss. Do your own research before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is GOWF ownership?

As of 2026-09-23 15:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 18.83% of supply. It reports 2,830 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling GOWF?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-23 15:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $45,859.00 in buys and $52,977.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is GOWF liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +47.32%, from $33,759.92 (2026-09-23 14:00 UTC) to $49,735.82 (2026-09-23 15:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for GOWF (GOWF)?

The most recent hourly candle shows price whipsawing from a low of ~$0.0000087 to a high of ~$0.000507 before closing near $0.000479, indicating extreme volatility and a likely unstable base. With near 50/50 buy/sell volume split (46.4% buy vs 53.6% sell) and thin liquidity (~$67.81K), price could swing sharply in either direction on modest order flow. Short-term direction is uncertain given the parabolic move already realized. Short-term outlook is neutral (24-48 hours), with a target range of $0.00028 to $0.00060.

Is GOWF a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 85/100. This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total capital loss. Given the shallow liquidity, extreme volatility, unresolved authority risk, and missing sniper/holder-history data, this is not appropriate for conservative or long-term investors, and any position should be sized as high-risk speculative capital only.

What are the key risks of holding GOWF?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($67.81K) relative to FDV ($479K), enabling high slippage and easy price manipulation • Parabolic, likely unsustainable price action (+171.9% with a 40-50x intra-hour candle range) typical of pump-and-dump patterns on new low-liquidity tokens • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing by the deployer

← Back to all predictions

Track GOWF