.agent

.agent Price Today & AI Analysis

.agentSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 24, 2026

Price

$0.000272

+477.68% 24h · FDV $258,083

Contract

Live
G59zeXWwXMw2bb6UJD1ceELXRhNkLXHkYrtBYBV5agnt

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,848

Market cap

$258,083

More tokens on Solana

SPXSPXSPX6900 (Wormhole)$0.4414-16.3%MC $36.56MRufoRufoChristopher Rufo$0.044469-7.5%MC $41.5KEMBEREMBERembercurve$0.0213+21.8%MC $21.08MarcarcAI Rig Complex$0.0799+0.5%MC $79.87MARCHIBROWNARCHIBROWNArchibald Brown$0.000181-78.9%MC $161.7KRAYRAYRaydium$1.99+8.6%MC $1.10B

.agent: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-24 11:16 UTC

Holder addresses

1,848

Top 10 supply share

16.46%

Reported liquidity

$24,485.00
How concentrated is .agent ownership?
As of 2026-09-24 11:16 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 16.46% of supply. It reports 1,848 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling .agent?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-24 11:16 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $609,976.00 in buys and $589,784.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is .agent liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed -21.56%, from $31,221.91 (2026-09-24 10:00 UTC) to $24,491.34 (2026-09-24 11:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-24 11:16 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-24 10:00 UTC$31,221.91
2026-09-24 11:00 UTC$24,491.34

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about .agent

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 24, 11:18 AM UTC

FDV

$258,083

Liquidity

$24,485.00

Holders

1,848

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

.agent is a very recently active, extremely low-liquidity Solana token trading on PumpSwap, marketed as 'Identity Infrastructure for AI Agents.' It has experienced an explosive but erratic +477.7% 24h price move (with a +573.5% 1h spike followed by a -12.6% 5m pullback), backed by only $24.48K in total liquidity against over $1.2M in combined 24h volume. Top-10 holders control 16.46% of the 950.28M token supply (FDV ~$258K), but critical risk data - mint/freeze authority status, sniper activity, deeper holder concentration, and holder history - are all unavailable, leaving major gaps in the risk picture.

Key points

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($24.48K) relative to trading volume, creating outsized volatility and slippage risk
  • Explosive, whipsaw price action (+477.7% 24h, +573.5% 1h, -12.6% 5m) typical of a freshly launched speculative token
  • Multiple critical unknowns: mint/freeze authority status, sniper/early-buyer behavior, and deeper (top-50/100) holder concentration are all unavailable
  • Narrative positioning around AI agent identity infrastructure (NFT passports/domains), an unverified marketing claim rather than confirmed utility
  • Slightly net-positive buy pressure (50.8% buy vs 49.2% sell) and more unique buyers (4,025) than sellers (2,955) over the last 24h

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-48 hours

neutral

Given the extreme volatility already observed (parabolic +573% 1h spike followed by an immediate pullback), short-term direction is highly uncertain. The most recent 5m change of -12.6% suggests some cooling from the peak, but with only $24.48K liquidity, large swings in either direction remain likely.

Target low

$0.00015

Target high

$0.00045

Support

$0.000220 (recent hourly low), $0.0000033 (extreme prior candle low, likely an anomaly/wick)

Resistance

$0.000448 (prior hourly open/near-term resistance), $0.000524 (recent hourly high)

Medium term · 1-2 weeks

neutral

Medium-term direction depends heavily on whether liquidity deepens and whether the AI-agent narrative sustains organic interest beyond the initial speculative spike. Without more OHLC history, holder trend data, or authority confirmations, a confident directional call cannot be made.

Catalysts

  • Any liquidity additions or new pool listings that reduce slippage risk
  • Confirmation (or lack thereof) of mint/freeze authority renouncement
  • Growth or stagnation in unique holder count and buy/sell wallet ratios
  • Broader market sentiment toward AI-agent-narrative tokens
  • Potential sniper/early-buyer distribution if such wallets begin offloading positions

Bullish factors

  • Net positive buy volume (50.8%) and more unique buyers than sellers over 24h
  • Very low FDV (~$258K) leaves theoretical room for upside if narrative adoption grows
  • Active social presence (Twitter, website) potentially supporting continued marketing-driven interest

Bearish factors

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($24.48K) makes the price highly susceptible to sharp reversals or manipulation
  • Parabolic price action followed by a negative 5-minute move is a common precursor to further downside correction
  • Unknown authority and sniper risk factors could materialize into sudden negative price shocks
  • High volume-to-liquidity ratio increases risk of a rapid liquidity drain event

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extremely limited OHLC history (only 2 candles provided), absence of sniper data, absence of holder history, and unknown authority status. The single available candle pair shows an extraordinarily wide range that could reflect either a genuine launch spike or data/market anomalies, further reducing reliability of any directional call.

.agent call history

Full track record →

Sep 24neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
G59zeX...agnt
Total Supply
950,279,314.13 (.agent tokens)

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($24.48K) relative to 24h volume (~$1.2M combined), creating high slippage and price-manipulation risk
  • Explosive, erratic price action (+477.7% 24h, +573.5% 1h, then -12.6% in the last 5m) typical of a newly launched, thinly traded PumpSwap token
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezes
  • No sniper data available, so early-buyer dump risk cannot be assessed at all

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (10:00 UTC) opened at $0.00000325, spiked to a high of $0.000516, dropped back to a low equal to its open ($0.00000325), and closed at $0.000448 - an enormous range suggesting either a chaotic launch bar or data noise, with volume of ~1.03M. Candle 2 (11:00 UTC) opened at $0.000448 (matching prior close), pushed to a new high of $0.000524, sold off to a low of $0.000221, and closed at $0.000272, with lower volume of ~223K. This shows a clear high-to-low fade within the most recent hour after the initial spike.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Zooming out, the token is up +477.7% over 24h, indicating a strong medium-term uptrend from its origin point, but the most recent hourly candle shows the price fading from its high of $0.000524 down to $0.000272 (close), a decline of roughly 48% within the hour - a clear short-term downtrend/retracement following the initial spike.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000221 (candle 2 low)

Major support

$0.0000033 (candle 1 low/open, likely anomalous)

Immediate resistance

$0.000448 (candle 2 open, prior close level)

Major resistance

$0.000524 (candle 2 high, session high)

With only two candles of data, support/resistance levels are tentative. The $0.000221 level from the most recent candle's low is the nearest support to watch; a break below could target the far lower and likely anomalous $0.0000033 level, though that level may not be a realistic technical support given its extreme deviation. On the upside, $0.000448 (prior close/open) is immediate resistance, with $0.000524 (the session high) as the major resistance to reclaim for renewed bullish momentum.

Notable patterns

  • Sharp spike-and-fade pattern: rapid rise to a high followed by a steep retracement within the same/adjacent hourly candles, characteristic of a speculative pump losing momentum
  • Extremely wide-range candle in the first observed bar, indicative of high volatility/possible thin-liquidity price discovery rather than orderly trading
  • Declining volume between the two candles, suggesting waning buying intensity after the initial spike

Liquidity

Liquidity

$24,485.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $24.48K is extremely shallow relative to the 24h trading volume of over $1.2M combined (buy+sell), implying the pool has likely turned over 40-50x its depth in a single day. This is a strong signal of high slippage risk for anything beyond small trade sizes and raises the risk of sharp price swings on relatively modest order flow - consistent with the observed 1h candle where price spiked from ~$0.0000033 to a high of ~$0.00052 and then partially retraced to ~$0.000272, a >150x intra-candle range. Buy volume ($609.98K) modestly exceeds sell volume ($589.78K), a slight net inflow (50.8% vs 49.2% pressure), and buyers (4,025) outnumber sellers (2,955), suggesting more distinct participants are buying than selling, but this is a razor-thin edge given the volume sizes and shallow liquidity base. The single trading pair is on PumpSwap, a permissionless AMM environment commonly used for newly launched tokens, which further elevates volatility and rug/manipulation risk.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

950,279,314.13 (.agent tokens)

FDV

$258.08K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change of +477.7% with a 1h change of +573.5% and a 5m change of -12.6% shows extreme, whipsaw volatility. The most recent hourly candle ranged from a low of $0.00022 to a high of $0.00052 (open $0.000448, close $0.000272), a >130% intra-hour swing, indicating the token is in a highly speculative, unstable price-discovery phase.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $24.48K against 24h volume north of $1.2M combined, meaning the pool is thin relative to trading activity. This creates high slippage risk and makes the price highly sensitive to individual large trades, and vulnerable to liquidity removal.

  • Concentrationmedium

    Top-10 holders control 16.46% of supply per the current Codex snapshot. This is a real but moderate figure; deeper concentration (top-50/top-100) and holder classification data are unavailable, so the true concentration risk could be materially higher or lower than this partial view suggests.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($24.48K) relative to 24h volume (~$1.2M combined), creating high slippage and price-manipulation risk
  • Explosive, erratic price action (+477.7% 24h, +573.5% 1h, then -12.6% in the last 5m) typical of a newly launched, thinly traded PumpSwap token
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezes
  • No sniper data available, so early-buyer dump risk cannot be assessed at all
  • Holder data limited to a single current snapshot (1848 addresses, top-10 at 16.46%) with no history, so accumulation/distribution trends and deeper concentration (top-50/100) are unknown
  • Single liquidity venue/pair dependency (PumpSwap) with no diversification across pools or CEX listings apparent from the data

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy volume ($609.98K) slightly exceeds sell volume ($589.78K), and unique buyers (4,025) exceed unique sellers (2,955), suggesting marginally more net buying interest than selling over the period
  • Top-10 holder concentration of 16.46% is not extreme on its face compared to many newly launched tokens, though this is based on limited data
  • Project has stated utility narrative (AI agent identity/domain infrastructure) and social presence (Twitter, website), which may support longer-term interest beyond pure speculation - though this is unverified marketing claim, not on-chain fact

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced traders who fully understand shallow-liquidity microcap/memecoin-style dynamics on PumpSwap and can tolerate potential total loss of capital. Not appropriate for risk-averse investors, those seeking stable exposure, or anyone unable to actively monitor extremely volatile positions. Position sizing should be minimal given the very_high overall risk classification and multiple unknown risk dimensions (authority status, sniper activity, deeper holder concentration).

'.agent' is a newly launched, extremely thin-liquidity token on PumpSwap tied to a stated 'Identity Infrastructure for AI Agents' narrative (NFT passports/domains for AI agents). The available data shows explosive but highly erratic price action, a moderate top-10 concentration (16.46%), and multiple critical unknowns (mint/freeze authority status, sniper activity, deeper holder distribution, holder history). This combination makes it a highly speculative, high-risk/high-reward setup suitable only for very small, risk-capital positions.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If the AI-agent-identity narrative gains traction and genuine organic buying continues (buy volume already modestly exceeding sell volume with more unique buyers than sellers), the token could see continued momentum-driven upside, especially given its very low current FDV (~$258K) relative to typical narrative-driven microcap rallies.

  • Sustained net positive buy pressure (currently 50.8% buy vs 49.2% sell) and buyer count exceeding seller count (4,025 vs 2,955)
  • Growing narrative interest in AI agent infrastructure tokens broadly
  • Low FDV ($258K) leaves room for multiple-x appreciation if adoption or speculative interest increases
  • Active social presence (Twitter, website) could support marketing-driven momentum

Base Case

Price likely continues to exhibit high volatility with elevated risk of retracement toward recent support levels as the initial speculative spike cools off, absent new sustained catalysts; the token will probably continue trading in a wide, unstable range typical of freshly launched PumpSwap tokens.

  • No major changes to liquidity depth in the near term (still ~$24.48K)
  • Continued high volume-to-liquidity ratio sustaining large percentage swings
  • No confirmed resolution of authority/sniper data gaps in the immediate term
  • Speculative narrative-driven trading dominates over fundamental usage in the short term

Bear Case

High probability

Given the shallow $24.48K liquidity pool, unknown authority status, and total absence of sniper/holder-history transparency, a sharp reversal, liquidity pull, or coordinated dump remains a highly plausible outcome, especially after such an extreme +477.7% 24h spike.

  • Extremely shallow liquidity relative to volume creates high vulnerability to large sell orders or liquidity removal
  • Parabolic +573% 1h move followed by a -12.6% 5m pullback is a classic pattern preceding sharp corrections in low-liquidity tokens
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status could allow supply inflation or account freezes without warning
  • No sniper data means early insider/bot dumping risk is entirely unquantified and could materialize suddenly
  • Single-pair/single-venue liquidity dependency (PumpSwap only) offers no redundancy if liquidity is withdrawn

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 24, 11:18 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-24 11:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Token metadata (mint, supply, decimals, description, social links)
  • Price feed (USD price and % change intervals)
  • OHLC hourly candles (most recent 2 data points) from PumpSwap pair
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, buyer/seller counts, liquidity, FDV)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count, top-10 concentration)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles were provided, severely limiting technical pattern analysis and trend confirmation
  • No sniper data available at all - early buyer/dump dynamics are completely unassessed
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) - only a current snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration is available
  • Top-100 holder concentration, wallet classifications, and notable holder identification data are not available
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, verified-contract status, and mutability flags are all unknown - authority-based rug risk cannot be assessed
  • 6h price % change was reported as unknown, leaving a gap in the multi-timeframe momentum picture
  • Token metadata fields (description, social links) are creator-supplied and unverified; treated strictly as claims, not facts

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain and market data as of the stated timestamp and may not reflect current conditions. Cryptocurrency trading, especially in low-liquidity, newly launched tokens, carries substantial risk of loss, including total loss of capital. Conduct your own independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is .agent ownership?

As of 2026-09-24 11:16 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 16.46% of supply. It reports 1,848 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling .agent?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-24 11:16 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $609,976.00 in buys and $589,784.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is .agent liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed -21.56%, from $31,221.91 (2026-09-24 10:00 UTC) to $24,491.34 (2026-09-24 11:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for .agent (.agent)?

Given the extreme volatility already observed (parabolic +573% 1h spike followed by an immediate pullback), short-term direction is highly uncertain. The most recent 5m change of -12.6% suggests some cooling from the peak, but with only $24.48K liquidity, large swings in either direction remain likely. Short-term outlook is neutral (24-48 hours), with a target range of $0.00015 to $0.00045.

Is .agent a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced traders who fully understand shallow-liquidity microcap/memecoin-style dynamics on PumpSwap and can tolerate potential total loss of capital. Not appropriate for risk-averse investors, those seeking stable exposure, or anyone unable to actively monitor extremely volatile positions. Position sizing should be minimal given the very_high overall risk classification and multiple unknown risk dimensions (authority status, sniper activity, deeper holder concentration).

What are the key risks of holding .agent?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($24.48K) relative to 24h volume (~$1.2M combined), creating high slippage and price-manipulation risk • Explosive, erratic price action (+477.7% 24h, +573.5% 1h, then -12.6% in the last 5m) typical of a newly launched, thinly traded PumpSwap token • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezes

← Back to all predictions

Track .agent