f(x, y) = k Price Today & AI Analysis

OTTOSolanaAnalysis as of Jul 21, 2026

$0.0₅2558

Contract

Live

FhaCSvtpcpKJbih7p8b9kkEXhagz1yDLXvBKaQJ4pump

Chain

Solana

Holders

245

Market cap

$2,554

At a $1M market cap, $OTTO would be $0.001002 (392x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is OTTO a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 18

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

0.3%1 sniper, 1 bundler, 2 insiders still holding

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about OTTO

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

LFGLets Fucking Go$0.0₅9357+0.0%MC $8.7K

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONGLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG$0.0₅3854+0.0%MC $3.9K

HANSAAgent Hansa$0.0₅2695+0.0%MC $2.7K

趁热打铁趁热打铁$0.0₅2111+0.0%MC $2.1K

YENJIYenji$0.0₅3187+0.0%MC $3.1K

EterniaEternia$0.000247+475.7%MC $240.9K

f(x, y) = k: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-21 02:17 UTC

Holder addresses

125

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$53,989.38

How concentrated is f(x, y) = k ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 125 addresses (2026-07-21 02:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling f(x, y) = k?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is f(x, y) = k liquidity falling?: As of 2026-07-21 02:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $53,989.38. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-21 02:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 21, 02:17 AM UTC

FDV

$222,094

Liquidity

$53,989.38

Holders

125

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

OTTO (f(x, y) = k) is a PumpFun-launched Solana memecoin (mint: FhaCSvtpcpKJbih7p8b9kkEXhagz1yDLXvBKaQJ4pump) with a total supply of 1,000,000,000 tokens and a current FDV of ~$222K. The token has experienced an extreme 576% 24h price spike, but the on-chain data reveals severe red flags: overwhelming sell pressure (70.4% sell volume), a dramatic collapse in holder count (from 716 to 125 in the most recent period — a drop of ~591 holders), zero top-holder data available, and total liquidity of only ~$54K. The price action is highly erratic with a 1h candle showing a range from $0.0000121 to $0.0000806. This token exhibits characteristics consistent with a pump-and-dump scheme.

Key points

Extreme 576% 24h price spike followed by heavy sell pressure (70.4% of volume)
Holder count collapsed from 716 to 125 — a loss of ~591 holders in the most recent reporting period
Historical holder count was completely flat at 716 for 30 consecutive days prior to the collapse, suggesting artificial or dormant holder base
Total liquidity is only ~$54K against a $222K FDV — very shallow market
No top holder data, no sniper data, and unknown update authority — severe data opacity

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token is in a post-pump distribution phase. The most recent hourly candle (02:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000705, hit a high of $0.0000705, and closed sharply lower at $0.0000327 — a bearish engulfing/collapse candle. The prior candle (01:00 UTC) showed a massive wick from $0.0000121 to $0.0000806, indicating a violent pump-and-dump spike. With 70.4% sell pressure, 1,708 sellers vs 1,245 buyers, and only $54K in liquidity, further downside is highly probable in the near term.

Target low

$0.0000121 (recent candle low / pump origin)

Target high

$0.0000706 (recent candle high resistance)

Support: $0.0000327 (candle [1] close), $0.0000121 (candle [2] low — pump origin)
Resistance: $0.0000706 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close), $0.0000806 (candle [2] high — spike peak)

Medium term · 1–30 days

bearish

The 30-day historical holder data shows a completely flat base of 716 holders with zero net change for an entire month, followed by a sudden collapse to 125. This pattern is consistent with a coordinated pump event followed by mass exit. Without genuine organic holder growth, sustained price appreciation is unlikely. The token is likely to retrace toward or below pre-pump levels.

Catalysts

Any renewed social media promotion could trigger a short-lived secondary pump
Broader Solana memecoin market rally could provide temporary lift
Absence of any utility or verified contract makes sustained recovery structurally unlikely

Bullish factors

576% 24h price gain demonstrates speculative demand can materialize rapidly
PumpSwap listing provides some DEX accessibility
Social links (Twitter, website) suggest some level of project presence

Bearish factors

70.4% sell pressure — sellers dominate volume ($235.8K sell vs $99.3K buy)
Holder count collapsed from 716 to 125 (-83% in the most recent period)
Only $54K total liquidity — extreme slippage risk for any meaningful position
Most recent hourly candle closed sharply lower (bearish engulfing pattern)
30 days of completely flat holder count prior to pump suggests artificial/bot-driven base
No verified contract, unknown update authority, no top holder transparency
5-minute price change of -11.3% at time of data capture indicates active selling

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) only 2 hourly OHLC candles available, (2) no top holder data, (3) no sniper data, (4) unknown update authority, and (5) extreme volatility making price targets unreliable. The directional bias (bearish) is high-confidence, but specific price levels are speculative given data limitations.

OTTO call history

Full track record →

Jul 21bearish@ $0.000222

24h-96.6%

7d-99.0%

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: FhaCSv...pump
Total Supply: 1,000,000,000 OTTO

Key Risks

Pump-and-dump pattern: 576% spike with immediate heavy sell pressure and holder collapse
Only $54K liquidity — extreme slippage and exit risk
Holder count collapsed 82.5% (716 → 125) coinciding with the pump event
30 days of completely flat holder count (zero change daily) prior to pump — highly anomalous

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (01:00 UTC): O=$0.0000327, H=$0.0000806, L=$0.0000121, C=$0.0000705 — a massive bullish spike candle with a long lower wick, indicating a violent pump from $0.0000121 to $0.0000806 with a close near the high. Candle [1] (02:00 UTC): O=$0.0000705, H=$0.0000705, L=$0.0000648, C=$0.0000327 — a strong bearish candle that opened at the prior close and sold off sharply, closing at $0.0000327. This two-candle sequence is a classic pump-and-dump pattern: spike up followed by immediate distribution and collapse. Note: the current price of $0.000222 is significantly higher than both candle closes, suggesting additional price action occurred after these candles that is not captured in the 2-candle dataset.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

The short-term trend is bearish based on the most recent candle's sharp close lower. The medium-term trend is also bearish given the 30-day flat holder base followed by a mass exit. The current price ($0.000222) being well above the candle data suggests a possible continuation pump or data lag — but the overwhelming sell pressure and holder collapse point to a distribution phase.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

30%

Sell

70%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000327 (candle [1] close)

Major support

$0.0000121 (candle [2] low — pump origin)

Immediate resistance

$0.0000706 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close)

Major resistance

$0.0000806 (candle [2] spike high)

Support levels are derived from the two available OHLC candles. The $0.0000327 level is the most recent candle close and acts as immediate support. The $0.0000121 level is the absolute low of the pump candle and represents the pre-pump baseline. Resistance sits at $0.0000706 (the open of the distribution candle) and $0.0000806 (the spike peak). Note: current price of $0.000222 is well above these levels, suggesting either additional candles not captured in the dataset or a data discrepancy.

Notable patterns

Pump-and-dump two-candle pattern: massive spike candle followed by immediate bearish reversal candle
Bearish engulfing on candle [1] relative to candle [2] close
Long lower wick on candle [2] indicating initial selling pressure absorbed before spike
No upper wick on candle [1] open (gap up to resistance) — distribution from the open
Extreme volume relative to liquidity pool size (6x turnover ratio)

Liquidity

$53,989.38

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

The liquidity situation is critically shallow. With only ~$54K in total liquidity on PumpSwap (pair: Gk4bTMVvhK8PfVx8f5ZSRFGmpzoY1sE1WBu1dsuZkHci), any trade of meaningful size will incur severe slippage. The 24h volume of ~$335K is approximately 6.2x the total liquidity pool — an extremely high turnover ratio indicating the pool is being churned rapidly. Net flow is strongly negative: $235.8K in sell volume vs $99.3K in buy volume represents a $136.5K net outflow. There are 463 more unique sellers than buyers (1,708 vs 1,245), and sell transactions outnumber buy transactions 4,190 to 2,512. The FDV-to-liquidity ratio of ~4.1x ($222K FDV / $54K liquidity) is poor, meaning a large portion of the market cap is not backed by accessible liquidity. Market health is assessed as very poor.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1,000,000,000 OTTO

FDV

$222,093.84

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
576% 24h price gain with a 1h candle showing a range from $0.0000121 to $0.0000806 (567% intra-hour range). The 5-minute price change of -11.3% at data capture time confirms ongoing extreme volatility. This level of volatility is consistent with a pump-and-dump event.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only ~$54K against a $222K FDV. The 24h volume of ~$335K is 6.2x the liquidity pool. Any position larger than a few hundred dollars will face significant slippage. Exit liquidity is severely limited.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Pump-and-dump pattern: 576% spike with immediate heavy sell pressure and holder collapse
Only $54K liquidity — extreme slippage and exit risk
Holder count collapsed 82.5% (716 → 125) coinciding with the pump event
30 days of completely flat holder count (zero change daily) prior to pump — highly anomalous
Unknown update authority — mint/freeze authority status unconfirmed
No top holder data — concentration risk cannot be assessed
No verified contract — no code audit or transparency
70.4% sell volume dominance — active distribution in progress
FDV ($222K) is 4.1x the available liquidity ($54K)

Mitigating factors

Mutable: false — token metadata cannot be altered
PumpFun launch provides some standardized launch mechanism transparency
Social links present (Twitter, website) — some level of project presence
Possible spam flag is false per data provider
Token is trading on PumpSwap DEX — some baseline accessibility

Suitable for

This token is NOT suitable for risk-averse or retail investors. The combination of pump-and-dump price action, collapsing holder count, shallow liquidity, unknown authority status, and absent holder/sniper data creates an extremely high-risk profile. Only highly experienced traders with strict position sizing, stop-losses, and full awareness of potential total loss should consider any exposure. This analysis is informational only and does not constitute financial advice.

OTTO (f(x, y) = k) presents as a high-risk PumpFun memecoin in an active distribution phase following a violent pump event. The on-chain data is overwhelmingly bearish: 70.4% sell pressure, an 82.5% holder count collapse, only $54K in liquidity, unknown authority status, and no top holder or sniper transparency. The 30-day flat holder history prior to the pump is a major red flag suggesting an artificial or coordinated setup. There is no identifiable utility, no verified contract, and no description. The risk/reward profile is extremely unfavorable for new entrants at current prices.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

A secondary pump driven by social media momentum or broader Solana memecoin market activity temporarily pushes price higher, allowing early holders to exit at better prices. The token's mathematical name (f(x, y) = k — the constant product AMM formula) could attract niche DeFi community attention.

Renewed social media promotion or viral moment
Broader Solana memecoin market rally lifting all boats
Niche DeFi community interest in the AMM formula branding
Low float if most supply is concentrated — small buy pressure could move price significantly

Base Case

Price stabilizes at a significantly lower level than the pump peak as the most aggressive sellers exit. A small residual community of 50–125 holders remains. Trading volume drops sharply. The token trades in a low-liquidity, high-volatility range with occasional speculative spikes but no sustained upward trend.

Sell pressure gradually exhausts as motivated sellers exit
Remaining holders are longer-term speculators or lost wallets
No new significant catalysts emerge to drive organic adoption
Liquidity pool remains at current shallow levels (~$54K)

Bear Case

High probability

The pump-and-dump completes its cycle: remaining holders exit, liquidity drains further, and the token price collapses back toward or below pre-pump levels (~$0.0000121 candle low or lower). The token becomes dormant again with a small residual holder base.

70.4% sell pressure continues as remaining holders exit
Liquidity pool drains as LPs withdraw following the pump
Holder count continues declining from 125 toward single digits
No utility, no verified contract, no organic growth catalysts
Unknown authority status could enable additional malicious actions

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 21, 02:17 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-21 02:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

Moralis on-chain token metadata API
PumpSwap DEX trading analytics
Hourly OHLC price candles (2 candles available)
Holder metrics and historical holder time series (30 days)
Trading volume and buyer/seller analytics
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
No top holder data returned — concentration risk cannot be quantified
No sniper data available — early buyer behavior cannot be assessed
Update authority listed as 'unknown' — authority renunciation status unconfirmed
Holder distribution metrics (whales/sharks/dolphins/fish/octopus) all show zero — data appears unpopulated
Top 10 and top 100 supply concentration both show 0% — likely a data availability issue, not genuine distribution
The 1h holder change of -914 (-730%) is mathematically inconsistent with the 24h figure of -591 (-470%) and may reflect a data artifact
Current price ($0.000222) is significantly higher than both OHLC candle closes ($0.0000327 and $0.0000705), suggesting additional price action not captured in the 2-candle dataset
No contract code available for audit — smart contract risk cannot be assessed

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap memecoins, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed comes from on-chain sources and third-party APIs which may contain errors, delays, or gaps. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is f(x, y) = k (OTTO) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 18, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell f(x, y) = k (OTTO)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 18, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is f(x, y) = k ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 125 addresses (2026-07-21 02:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling f(x, y) = k?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is f(x, y) = k liquidity falling?

As of 2026-07-21 02:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $53,989.38. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for f(x, y) = k (OTTO)?

Is OTTO a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is NOT suitable for risk-averse or retail investors. The combination of pump-and-dump price action, collapsing holder count, shallow liquidity, unknown authority status, and absent holder/sniper data creates an extremely high-risk profile. Only highly experienced traders with strict position sizing, stop-losses, and full awareness of potential total loss should consider any exposure. This analysis is informational only and does not constitute financial advice.

What are the key risks of holding OTTO?

Pump-and-dump pattern: 576% spike with immediate heavy sell pressure and holder collapse • Only $54K liquidity — extreme slippage and exit risk • Holder count collapsed 82.5% (716 → 125) coinciding with the pump event