f(x, y) = k Price Today & AI Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (01:00 UTC): O=$0.0000327, H=$0.0000806, L=$0.0000121, C=$0.0000705 — a massive bullish spike candle with a long lower wick, indicating a violent pump from $0.0000121 to $0.0000806 with a close near the high. Candle [1] (02:00 UTC): O=$0.0000705, H=$0.0000705, L=$0.0000648, C=$0.0000327 — a strong bearish candle that opened at the prior close and sold off sharply, closing at $0.0000327. This two-candle sequence is a classic pump-and-dump pattern: spike up followed by immediate distribution and collapse. Note: the current price of $0.000222 is significantly higher than both candle closes, suggesting additional price action occurred after these candles that is not captured in the 2-candle dataset.

The short-term trend is bearish based on the most recent candle's sharp close lower. The medium-term trend is also bearish given the 30-day flat holder base followed by a mass exit. The current price ($0.000222) being well above the candle data suggests a possible continuation pump or data lag — but the overwhelming sell pressure and holder collapse point to a distribution phase.

Key Price Levels

Support levels are derived from the two available OHLC candles. The $0.0000327 level is the most recent candle close and acts as immediate support. The $0.0000121 level is the absolute low of the pump candle and represents the pre-pump baseline. Resistance sits at $0.0000706 (the open of the distribution candle) and $0.0000806 (the spike peak). Note: current price of $0.000222 is well above these levels, suggesting either additional candles not captured in the dataset or a data discrepancy.

The holder data presents multiple severe red flags. For 30 consecutive days (June 21 – July 20, 2026), the holder count was exactly 716 with zero net change on every single day. This level of stasis is highly anomalous for an active token and suggests either data staleness, a dormant token, or an artificially maintained holder count. The most recent data shows a collapse to 125 holders — a loss of 591 holders (82.5% of the base). The 1h change of -914 (-730%) is mathematically inconsistent with the 24h figure and may reflect a data artifact or rapid wallet consolidation. Acquisition breakdown shows 108 via swap and 17 via transfer, with zero airdrops. The distribution metrics (whales=0, sharks=0, dolphins=0, fish=0, octopus=0) and top10/top100 concentration of 0% indicate that holder classification data is unavailable or broken for this token.

No top holder data is available for OTTO. The top holders endpoint returned no results, and the supply concentration metrics show 0% for both top 10 and top 100 — this is almost certainly a data availability issue rather than a genuine reflection of distribution. With only 125 current holders and a total supply of 1B tokens, concentration is likely very high in practice but cannot be quantified from the available data. The absence of whale/shark/dolphin/fish/octopus classifications further confirms the holder distribution data is not populated. This opacity is itself a risk factor — investors cannot assess concentration risk without this data. Given the pump-and-dump price pattern and holder collapse, the sentiment is assessed as 'mixed' (some holders may still be holding while others have exited).

The liquidity situation is critically shallow. With only ~$54K in total liquidity on PumpSwap (pair: Gk4bTMVvhK8PfVx8f5ZSRFGmpzoY1sE1WBu1dsuZkHci), any trade of meaningful size will incur severe slippage. The 24h volume of ~$335K is approximately 6.2x the total liquidity pool — an extremely high turnover ratio indicating the pool is being churned rapidly. Net flow is strongly negative: $235.8K in sell volume vs $99.3K in buy volume represents a $136.5K net outflow. There are 463 more unique sellers than buyers (1,708 vs 1,245), and sell transactions outnumber buy transactions 4,190 to 2,512. The FDV-to-liquidity ratio of ~4.1x ($222K FDV / $54K liquidity) is poor, meaning a large portion of the market cap is not backed by accessible liquidity. Market health is assessed as very poor.

The token has a fixed supply of 1,000,000,000 (1B) OTTO with 6 decimal places. The FDV at current price is ~$222K. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and the contract is not verified. The 'Mutable: false' flag is a mild positive — it suggests the token metadata cannot be changed. However, mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the available data (update authority is 'unknown' rather than a known burn address). The token was launched via PumpFun (indicated by the 'pump' suffix in the mint address), which typically involves a bonding curve mechanism. The lack of a description, unverified contract, and unknown authority status are all risk factors. The token has social links (Twitter, website, Moralis) but no description, which is unusual. The 'possible spam: false' flag from the data provider offers minimal reassurance given the other red flags present.

OTTO (f(x, y) = k) presents as a high-risk PumpFun memecoin in an active distribution phase following a violent pump event. The on-chain data is overwhelmingly bearish: 70.4% sell pressure, an 82.5% holder count collapse, only $54K in liquidity, unknown authority status, and no top holder or sniper transparency. The 30-day flat holder history prior to the pump is a major red flag suggesting an artificial or coordinated setup. There is no identifiable utility, no verified contract, and no description. The risk/reward profile is extremely unfavorable for new entrants at current prices.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap memecoins, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed comes from on-chain sources and third-party APIs which may contain errors, delays, or gaps. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.