YENJI

Yenji Price Prediction 2026

YENJI
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of May 12, 2026

FhxuJ4YvcfyEBMswyDKquvS1QVDpkPj3VmRJzViKpump

$0.052125

-0.63%

FDV $2,079

LiveContract:FhxuJ4YvcfyEBMswyDKquvS1QVDpkPj3VmRJzViKpumpChain:SolanaHolders:444Market cap:$2,079

More tokens on Solana

JUNK

JUNK

JUNKBOT

$0.0518262.3%
MC $1.8K
Moley

Moley

Moley

$0.0515833.2%
MC $1.5K
ascend

ascend

ascend

$0.0522632.7%
MC $2.3K
PDEX

PDEX

PokéDex

$0.0553770.1%
MC $5.4K
BLOWIE

BLOWIE

BLOWIE

$0.0516121.4%
MC $1.6K
arc

arc

AI Rig Complex

$0.060614.9%
MC $60.63M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about YENJI

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of May 12, 05:48 PM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$0

Holders

1,028

Snipers

41

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

YENJI (Yenji) is a meme/cult token on Solana launched via PumpSwap, trading at $0.000204 with a 6.67% 24h gain. The token is extremely new — holder count exploded from 73 to 1,028 within the last 24 hours (+955 holders, +93%). Total reported liquidity is $0.00 per the analytics feed, suggesting liquidity data may be incomplete or the pool is very thin. The token carries a 'goblin cult' narrative with social presence on Telegram and Twitter. Metadata is mutable and update authority is unknown, raising governance risk. Supply concentration is moderate-to-high with top 10 holding 23.85% and top 100 holding 82.45%. Sell pressure dominates at 57.2% of 24h volume. This is a very high-risk, speculative micro-cap meme token.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Explosive 24h holder growth: +955 holders (+93%) in a single day, from a dormant base of 73
Launched on PumpSwap with a 'goblin cult' meme narrative and active social channels
20 identified snipers, majority in profit — indicating early smart-money participation
Sell pressure dominates (57.2%) with 5,232 sells vs 1,314 buys in 24h
Metadata is mutable with unknown update authority — elevated rug risk

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The most recent hourly candle (17:00 UTC) shows a bearish close: opened at $0.000234, hit a low of $0.000180, and closed at $0.000204 — a significant pullback from open. The prior candle (16:00 UTC) was extremely volatile with a range from $0.0000685 to $0.000376. Sell pressure at 57.2% and 5,232 sells vs 1,314 buys in 24h suggest continued downward pressure in the near term. The 1h price change of -25.7% confirms momentum is fading.

Target low$0.000068
Target high$0.000234
Support: $0.000180 (recent hourly low), $0.000068 (candle [2] absolute low)
Resistance: $0.000234 (candle [1] open / recent high), $0.000376 (candle [2] spike high)

Medium term

neutral
3–14 days

Medium-term outlook is highly uncertain. If the cult narrative gains traction and social momentum builds, a second wave of buyers could push price toward the $0.000376 spike high. However, with $0.00 reported liquidity, dominant sell pressure, and most snipers already in profit and selling, the probability of sustained upside is low without new catalysts.

Catalysts
  • Viral social media momentum on Twitter/Telegram driving new buyer waves
  • Influencer or KOL endorsement of the YENJI cult narrative
  • Listing on a DEX aggregator or tracker increasing visibility
  • Sniper profit-taking exhaustion creating a price floor

Bullish factors

  • 24h price up 6.67% despite heavy sell pressure
  • Rapid holder accumulation (+955 in 24h) signals growing community interest
  • Multiple snipers with 90%+ realized PnL still holding partial positions
  • 5-minute price change of +6.0% suggests very short-term buying momentum
  • Meme/cult narrative with active Telegram and Twitter communities

Bearish factors

  • Sell pressure dominates at 57.2% of 24h volume ($577K sells vs $431K buys)
  • 5,232 sells vs only 1,314 buys — sellers outnumber buyers 4:1
  • 1h price change of -25.7% indicates sharp recent decline
  • Reported total liquidity of $0.00 — extremely thin or broken liquidity pool
  • Metadata is mutable with unknown update authority — rug risk present
  • Most snipers have already sold significant portions at profit, reducing upward pressure
Confidence: low. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, providing minimal technical history. Liquidity data shows $0.00 which is likely a data gap but signals very thin markets. The token is less than 24 hours old in its active trading phase, making any price prediction highly speculative.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (16:00 UTC): O=$0.0001178, H=$0.0003759, L=$0.0000685, C=$0.0002285 — a massive bullish spike with 449% range from low to high, closing near the midpoint. Volume was 693,881 units. Candle [1] (17:00 UTC): O=$0.0002340, H=$0.0002340, L=$0.0001796, C=$0.0002042 — a bearish candle opening at the high (no upper wick), closing below open with a lower wick, on reduced volume of 342,070 units. This pattern suggests the initial pump is losing steam with sellers taking control.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 43%Sell 57%

Short-term trend is bearish following the explosive candle [2] pump. The token opened candle [1] at $0.000234 (near candle [2] close) and sold off to $0.000204. With only 2 candles of history, medium-term trend is indeterminate — classified as sideways pending more data.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000180 (candle [1] low)
Major$0.000068 (candle [2] absolute low — launch floor)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000234 (candle [1] open = candle [2] close area)
Major$0.000376 (candle [2] spike high)

The $0.000180 level is the most recent tested support. A break below this opens a path to the $0.000068 launch-day low. On the upside, $0.000234 is the immediate resistance (prior candle open), and $0.000376 is the major resistance from the initial pump spike.

Notable patterns

  • Bearish shooting star / inverted hammer formation on candle [1] — opened at high, sold off, no upper wick
  • Massive volume spike on candle [2] followed by volume contraction on candle [1] — classic pump exhaustion pattern
  • Price opened candle [1] at candle [2] close, suggesting gap-fill selling pressure
  • No higher high formed in candle [1] vs candle [2] — momentum failing to extend

Total holders1,028
24h Δ+93
7d Δ+93
30d Δ+93
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The explosive holder growth (+955 holders, +93%) coincides directly with the 24h price action and the pump event visible in candle [2]. The token sat dormant at 73 holders for the entire 30-day historical window (Apr 12 – May 11, 2026) with zero net change daily. The surge to 1,028 holders happened within the last 24 hours, perfectly correlated with the price spike from ~$0.000068 to $0.000376. This suggests the holder growth is driven by the pump event attracting retail FOMO buyers rather than organic community building.

Holder data reveals a stark two-phase story: (1) Dormant phase — the token had exactly 73 holders for 30 consecutive days (Apr 12 – May 11) with zero net change, indicating no organic growth or trading activity. (2) Explosive launch phase — within the last 24 hours, holders surged by +955 to reach 1,028 total (+93%). The 7d and 30d growth figures are identical to 24h, confirming all growth occurred in a single day. Growth is technically 'accelerating' but this is a one-time event rather than a sustained trend. The 1h growth of +82 holders (+8%) suggests momentum is continuing but decelerating. Distribution breakdown: whales=137, sharks=65, dolphins=374, fish=310, octopus=129 — a relatively broad distribution across tiers, though 137 whale-tier holders is notable for a token this new.

Top 10 hold23.85%
Top 100 hold82.45%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

3e4HhWaa6fT9Kitx1mJUfLSA9wSyJP2WL6cubeUXPEFj

DEX Liquidity Pool (PumpSwap pair address — matches the trading pair 3e4HhWaa6fT9Kitx1mJUfLSA9wSyJP2WL6cubeUXPEFj)

9.69%

3sV8HBwECX7DGJW69EAtnREoznqs5qbPajwitnz6RJ4s

Individual whale / early accumulator

1.76%

4UkyHHRA9NvJVrhHKamKotBTnpmsAKcAsjsaYbEYwMkA

Individual whale / early accumulator

1.59%

7BeQ3TMg2W5qgMCNCWxHsBp4GWdLTNJb1Q29K4xAcwgp

Individual whale / early accumulator

1.57%

7pKP1qZeBbDDVjro5B6ybxwRv2Q3JEfhXSzM27aUM51x

Individual whale / early accumulator

1.57%

The top 10 holders control 23.85% of supply and the top 100 control 82.45%, indicating significant concentration in the broader holder base. The #1 holder (3e4HhWaa6fT9Kitx1mJUfLSA9wSyJP2WL6cubeUXPEFj) is the PumpSwap liquidity pool address, which is expected and not a concern in isolation. Holders #2–#10 each hold approximately 1.3–1.8% of supply individually — relatively modest individual positions but collectively significant. The top 100 holding 82.45% is a red flag, meaning the bottom 928 holders share only 17.55% of supply. NOTE: The percentage figures in the raw data appear to be formatted incorrectly (showing values like '9685775315183800.00%') — the actual percentages used here are derived from the balance figures relative to total supply. Overall whale sentiment is distributing given the dominant sell pressure and sniper exit activity.

Liquidity$0.00 (reported — likely data gap or extremely thin pool)
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$431,340
Sell$577,000
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers658
Unique sellers1,410

The reported total liquidity of $0.00 is almost certainly a data feed issue rather than literal zero liquidity (the token is actively trading at $0.000204 on PumpSwap pair 3e4HhWaa6fT9Kitx1mJUfLSA9wSyJP2WL6cubeUXPEFj), but it signals the pool is extremely thin. With 24h sell volume of $577K vs buy volume of $431K, there is a net outflow of approximately $145.7K. Sellers (1,410 unique) outnumber buyers (658 unique) by 2.1:1, and sell transactions (5,232) outnumber buy transactions (1,314) by nearly 4:1. This extreme sell-to-buy transaction ratio suggests many small sell orders are being executed, consistent with sniper and early holder distribution. Market health is poor: thin liquidity, dominant sell pressure, and high slippage risk for any meaningful position size. The FDV of $0.00 reported is also a data artifact — at $0.000204 per token the actual market cap depends on circulating supply which is unclear from the metadata (total supply formatted as '1' which appears to be a display artifact).

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1 (formatted) — likely a display artifact; actual token balances in the billions suggest the true supply is in the hundreds of billions or trillions of base units (decimals: 0)
FDV$0.00 (reported — data artifact; actual FDV cannot be computed without confirmed total supply)

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Tokenomics data is severely limited. The metadata reports total supply as '1' with 0 decimals, which is almost certainly a display/formatting error given that individual holder balances are in the tens of trillions of base units (e.g., holder #1 balance: 96,857,753,151,838). The true total supply appears to be in the quadrillions of base units. Mint authority and freeze authority status are unknown — the update authority field returns 'unknown' and the contract is unverified. The token is marked as 'Mutable: true', meaning metadata can be changed by the update authority, which is a risk factor. No master edition is present. The token was launched via PumpFun (mint address ends in 'pump'), which typically uses a bonding curve mechanism. Rug risk from authorities is classified as unknown due to missing authority data, but the mutable metadata and unverified contract elevate concern. FDV and market cap cannot be reliably computed from the available data.

Volatility
high

The token moved from $0.0000685 to $0.0003759 and back to $0.000204 within 2 hours — a 449% intra-hour range. The 1h price change of -25.7% confirms extreme volatility. This is a brand-new meme token with no price history beyond 2 candles.

Liquidity
high

Reported liquidity is $0.00 — even if this is a data gap, the PumpSwap pool for a sub-$1K market cap token is extremely thin. Large orders will face severe slippage. Exit liquidity is a major concern given the 4:1 sell-to-buy transaction ratio.

Concentration
high

Top 100 holders control 82.45% of supply. Top 10 hold 23.85%. While individual top holders (ex-LP) each hold ~1.3–1.8%, the overall distribution is highly concentrated with 82.45% in 100 wallets out of 1,028 total holders.

SniperDump
high

20 snipers identified in the first 1,000 blocks. The majority are in profit (17/20 positive PnL), with top snipers having sold $10,000–$11,200 each at 93–133% profit. High sell-through rate indicates active distribution. Remaining sniper balances ($1,568, $3,328, $4,695) represent continued dump risk.

Authority
high

Update authority is 'unknown', metadata is mutable ('Mutable: true'), contract is unverified, and mint/freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. This combination represents maximum authority risk — the token could be modified or rugged by the deployer.

Key risks

  • Unknown update authority with mutable metadata — potential for rug pull or token modification
  • Reported $0.00 liquidity — extreme slippage risk and potential inability to exit positions
  • Sniper dump risk: 20 snipers mostly in profit with high sell-through rates
  • Top 100 holders control 82.45% of supply — severe concentration risk
  • Token is less than 24 hours old with only 2 hourly candles of price history
  • Sell pressure dominates: 57.2% sell volume, 4:1 sell-to-buy transaction ratio
  • Total supply display anomaly ('1') suggests metadata issues or intentional obfuscation
  • No verified contract — cannot audit token mechanics or supply controls

Mitigating factors

  • Rapid holder growth (+955 in 24h) shows genuine community interest and demand
  • Active social presence on Telegram and Twitter provides some community accountability
  • PumpSwap/PumpFun launch mechanism provides some standardization of token mechanics
  • Multiple snipers with 90%+ PnL still hold partial positions, suggesting some belief in continued upside
  • 24h price is still up 6.67% despite heavy selling — some buy-side support exists
  • Broad distribution across holder tiers (dolphins=374, fish=310) suggests retail participation
Suitable for: Suitable ONLY for highly experienced DeFi traders who understand meme token mechanics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are actively monitoring positions. Absolutely not suitable for risk-averse investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. This token exhibits nearly every high-risk characteristic: new launch, unknown authorities, mutable metadata, thin liquidity, sniper activity, and dominant sell pressure.

YENJI is a high-risk, speculative meme token in its first 24 hours of active trading. The bull case rests entirely on viral social momentum and community growth sustaining buy pressure against heavy sniper distribution. The bear case — which carries higher probability — is that sniper and early holder selling overwhelms retail demand, collapsing the price back toward launch levels. There is no fundamental value proposition beyond the 'goblin cult' meme narrative.

Bull case (low)

The YENJI cult narrative goes viral on Crypto Twitter and Telegram, driving a sustained wave of new buyers that absorbs sniper selling and pushes price toward or beyond the $0.000376 spike high. Community-driven momentum creates a self-reinforcing FOMO cycle.

  • Viral social media spread of the goblin/cult meme narrative
  • KOL or influencer endorsement driving new buyer waves
  • Sniper selling exhaustion creating a price floor and reversal
  • Continued rapid holder growth sustaining buy pressure (currently +82/hour)

Base case

YENJI experiences a typical PumpFun launch cycle: initial pump (already occurred), distribution phase (currently underway), followed by a slow bleed as early holders exit. Price stabilizes somewhere between $0.000068 and $0.000180 with a small but persistent community of 1,000–2,000 holders. No significant catalyst emerges to drive a second wave.

  • Sniper selling completes within 24–48 hours, removing the largest distribution pressure
  • Holder count stabilizes around 1,000–1,500 as FOMO subsides
  • Price finds support near the $0.000068–$0.000180 range
  • Social channels remain active but fail to drive viral growth
  • No rug pull or authority exploit occurs

Bear case (high)

Sniper and early whale distribution overwhelms retail buying interest. The 4:1 sell-to-buy transaction ratio continues, liquidity dries up, and price collapses back toward the $0.000068 launch low or lower. The token joins the vast majority of PumpFun launches that fade within 48–72 hours.

  • Continued sniper profit-taking from remaining positions ($1,568–$4,695 in known balances)
  • Dominant sell pressure (57.2%) and 4:1 sell-to-buy transaction ratio
  • Unknown/mutable authority creating trust deficit among potential buyers
  • Thin liquidity amplifying downside moves
  • Meme narrative failing to sustain beyond initial launch hype

GeneratedMay 12, 05:48 PM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of approximately 2026-05-12T17:00–17:30 UTC. Historical holder data covers Apr 12 – May 11, 2026 (30 days). OHLC data limited to 2 hourly candles.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Moralis on-chain token metadata API
  • PumpSwap DEX trading analytics
  • OHLC price feed (hourly candles)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series
  • Top 20 holder wallet data
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks)
  • Trading volume and buyer/seller analytics

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Total liquidity reported as $0.00 — likely a data feed issue but unconfirmed
  • Total supply metadata shows '1' (formatted) — appears to be a display error; true supply unknown
  • Sniper initial buy amounts are all 'unknown' — prevents precise sniper concentration % calculation
  • Mint authority and freeze authority status are unknown — cannot confirm rug risk from authorities
  • Update authority is 'unknown' — cannot assess governance risk fully
  • FDV and market cap cannot be reliably computed due to supply data anomaly
  • Holder percentage figures in raw data appear incorrectly formatted (showing values >100%) — percentages recalculated from balance data
  • Token is less than 24 hours old — all metrics are extremely early-stage and subject to rapid change

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Meme tokens carry extreme risk of total loss. Past price action and holder growth do not guarantee future performance. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. The analyst has no position in YENJI.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1 (formatted) — likely a display artifact; actual token balances in the billions suggest the true supply is in the hundreds of billions or trillions of base units (decimals: 0)

Key Risks

•Unknown update authority with mutable metadata — potential for rug pull or token modification
•Reported $0.00 liquidity — extreme slippage risk and potential inability to exit positions
•Sniper dump risk: 20 snipers mostly in profit with high sell-through rates
•Top 100 holders control 82.45% of supply — severe concentration risk

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

medium confidence
High risk

20 snipers were active in the first 1,000 blocks. The vast majority are in profit — 17 of 20 show positive realized PnL, with several exceeding 90-150% gains. High-value snipers (those selling $10K+) have largely exited or are near full exit. Only 2 snipers show negative PnL (-49.3% and -25.9%). The sniper initial buy amounts are unknown (data field missing), preventing precise concentration calculation. The high sell-through rate and strong realized profits indicate smart money has largely distributed into retail demand.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateMostly In Profit
Sell-through rateHigh
Profit-taking risk
high

Of 20 identified snipers, the majority have sold significant portions of their positions. Top sellers include: wallet 2Z6bdoLq9Z3fBdFLBtHCDzXtfKS1M8xAK2qx42D2P4Ao ($11,198 sold, +93.7% PnL), 2TXhBpHtgw5J8JqZhKg5qGHs2TRXbCYEmpjTrNzDBx9A ($11,080 sold, +98.6% PnL), 398Tvtsa5u3qHc6XoPUhUKCfxqswHntFFGGqRL9eZzAV ($10,261 sold, +132.9% PnL), 2QvzJmvpWYFng3kjJTux1HWvQRMgMKe1JPc4d6YuUkgk ($10,097 sold, +93.5% PnL), 25nVpLrZw7pkVdu8jC2zyn8rnNSR6cT7ZEpckto7vMdg ($10,190 sold, +94.6% PnL). Only 3 snipers retain known remaining balances: 2a922bLvdBm3dA2reJkEuRz6sWbo4hGEqmLrVKUzRcJF ($1,568 remaining), 2jLQpLPyzBg6qjXuuzyhPxF9cEv94MCtnjLYKJkUCYgi ($3,328 remaining), 2oXbQhKQQ6dLBmdWxfyRvQeW1iCM2y948VcMBQpRueqq ($4,695 remaining).

Early buyers (snipers) are overwhelmingly profitable and have been aggressively selling into the pump. The top 5 snipers by sell volume collectively sold over $53,000 worth of tokens at 76-152% profit. This is a classic sniper dump pattern where early participants front-run retail buyers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for Yenji (YENJI)?

The most recent hourly candle (17:00 UTC) shows a bearish close: opened at $0.000234, hit a low of $0.000180, and closed at $0.000204 — a significant pullback from open. The prior candle (16:00 UTC) was extremely volatile with a range from $0.0000685 to $0.000376. Sell pressure at 57.2% and 5,232 sells vs 1,314 buys in 24h suggest continued downward pressure in the near term. The 1h price change of -25.7% confirms momentum is fading. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000068 to $0.000234.

Is YENJI a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable ONLY for highly experienced DeFi traders who understand meme token mechanics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are actively monitoring positions. Absolutely not suitable for risk-averse investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. This token exhibits nearly every high-risk characteristic: new launch, unknown authorities, mutable metadata, thin liquidity, sniper activity, and dominant sell pressure.

How are YENJI holders trending?

Yenji currently has 1,028 holders and is growing (24h: 93, 7d: 93, 30d: 93). Holder data reveals a stark two-phase story: (1) Dormant phase — the token had exactly 73 holders for 30 consecutive days (Apr 12 – May 11) with zero net change, indicating no organic growth or trading activity. (2) Explosive launch phase — within the last 24 hours, holders surged by +955 to reach 1,028 total (+93%). The 7d and 30d growth figures are identical to 24h, confirming all growth occurred in a single day. Growth is technically 'accelerating' but this is a one-time event rather than a sustained trend. The 1h growth of +82 holders (+8%) suggests momentum is continuing but decelerating. Distribution breakdown: whales=137, sharks=65, dolphins=374, fish=310, octopus=129 — a relatively broad distribution across tiers, though 137 whale-tier holders is notable for a token this new.

What does sniper activity look like for YENJI?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "mostly_in_profit" and sell-through rate "high". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding YENJI?

Unknown update authority with mutable metadata — potential for rug pull or token modification • Reported $0.00 liquidity — extreme slippage risk and potential inability to exit positions • Sniper dump risk: 20 snipers mostly in profit with high sell-through rates

← Back to all predictions

Track YENJI