趁热打铁

趁热打铁 Price Today & AI Analysis

趁热打铁
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 13, 2026

FhxKHmrieSPZgNEwx7riXMn1FzAWzuDV6ajqqbd7pump

$0.051919

FDV $1,918

LiveContract:FhxKHmrieSPZgNEwx7riXMn1FzAWzuDV6ajqqbd7pumpChain:SolanaHolders:136Market cap:$1,918

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about 趁热打铁

Report snapshotas of Jul 13, 06:17 AM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$57,031

Holders

788

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

趁热打铁 (Strike While the Iron is Hot) is an extremely anomalous PumpSwap token on Solana with a total supply of only 1 (zero decimals), trading at ~$0.000299 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$299.48K. The token exhibits severe red flags: 93.9% sell pressure in 24h ($271.70K sell vs $17.51K buy volume), only $57.03K in total liquidity, a mutable contract with unknown update authority, and deeply contradictory holder data (historical series shows only 8 holders for 30 days, yet current metrics report 788 holders with +780 added in the last hour). The token has no description, is unverified, and the name/symbol are Chinese characters. The data profile is consistent with a highly speculative, potentially manipulated micro-cap launch.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Total supply of exactly 1 token with 0 decimals — an extremely unusual tokenomic structure
93.9% sell pressure over 24h with $271.70K in sell volume vs only $17.51K in buys
Contradictory holder data: 30-day historical series shows flat 8 holders, yet current count reports 788 with 780 added in 1 hour
Mutable contract with unknown update authority — no renouncement confirmed
Price surged ~82% in 24h despite overwhelming sell pressure, suggesting possible wash trading or manipulation
No top holder data available and 0% supply concentration reported — data integrity is questionable

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The 5-minute price change is already -13.46%, and 93.9% of 24h volume is sell-side ($271.70K sells vs $17.51K buys). With only $57.03K in liquidity and 2,487 sell transactions vs 431 buys, downward pressure is extreme. The most recent candle (07:00 UTC) closed at $0.000299 after opening at $0.000339, forming a bearish close. Any continuation of selling could rapidly drain the shallow liquidity pool.

Target low$0.000050
Target high$0.000350
Support: $0.000266 (candle [1] low), $0.000024 (candle [2] open/low — prior session floor)
Resistance: $0.000338 (candle [1] open), $0.000364 (candle [1] high — recent peak)

Medium term

bearish
1–7 days

Given the overwhelming sell pressure, shallow liquidity, contradictory holder data, mutable contract, and lack of any verified fundamentals, the medium-term outlook is bearish. Without a credible catalyst or significant new buy-side demand, the token is likely to retrace toward its pre-pump levels near $0.000024 or lower.

Catalysts
  • Any new speculative wave or viral attention on Chinese-language crypto communities
  • Liquidity addition by insiders that could temporarily stabilize price
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally lifting all micro-caps

Bullish factors

  • Price is up 82% in 24h, showing some speculative momentum
  • 431 buy transactions in 24h indicate some active interest
  • PumpSwap listing provides accessible entry/exit

Bearish factors

  • 93.9% sell pressure — 2,487 sells vs 431 buys in 24h
  • $271.70K in sell volume vs only $17.51K in buy volume
  • Only $57.03K total liquidity — extremely shallow, high slippage risk
  • 5-minute price already down -13.46% at time of analysis
  • Contradictory holder data raises serious data integrity and manipulation concerns
  • Mutable contract with unknown update authority
  • No verified contract, no description, no project fundamentals
  • Historical holder series flat at 8 for 30 days contradicts reported 788 current holders
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to severely contradictory on-chain data (holder series inconsistency), only 2 OHLC candles available, unknown update authority, and the highly manipulated appearance of trading activity. The token's unusual structure (supply of 1) makes standard price modeling unreliable.

趁热打铁 call history

Full track record →
Jul 13bearish
24h-99.5%
7d-99.5%
30d-99.5%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available. Candle [2] (05:00 UTC): O=$0.0000242, H=$0.000345, L=$0.0000242, C=$0.000334 — an enormous bullish candle with a wick-to-body ratio suggesting a violent pump from near zero, closing near the high. Volume was 233,794. Candle [1] (06:00 UTC): O=$0.000339, H=$0.000364, L=$0.000267, C=$0.000299 — a bearish candle that opened near the prior close, made a marginal new high ($0.000364), then sold off to close below the open. Volume dropped to 49,590. This two-candle sequence is a classic 'pump and dump' pattern: explosive launch candle followed by a bearish reversal candle with declining volume.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 6%Sell 94%

The short-term trend has turned bearish after the initial pump candle. The most recent candle closed lower than it opened, and the 5-minute change is -13.46%. Medium-term trend is indeterminate given only 2 candles of history, but the pre-pump baseline was near $0.0000242.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000267 (candle [1] low)
Major$0.000024 (candle [2] open — pre-pump baseline)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000339 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close area)
Major$0.000364 (candle [1] all-time high)

The key support is the candle [1] low at $0.000267. A break below this opens the path to the pre-pump level near $0.000024. Resistance is the recent high at $0.000364. Given the sell pressure, reclaiming resistance appears unlikely in the near term.

Notable patterns

  • Pump-and-dump two-candle sequence: explosive bullish candle followed by bearish reversal
  • Bearish engulfing-style close: candle [1] closes well below its open after failing to hold candle [2] close
  • Volume climax on candle [2] followed by sharp volume decline — classic distribution signal
  • Long upper wick on candle [1] indicating sellers overwhelmed buyers at the high
  • 5-minute price -13.46% confirms accelerating downside momentum

Total holders788
24h Δ+780
7d Δ+780
30d Δ+780
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The reported +780 holder surge in the last hour coincides with the 82% price pump in 24h. However, this correlation is deeply suspicious: the 30-day historical series shows a flat 8 holders every single day from June 13 to July 12, 2026, with zero net change. Then 780 holders appear simultaneously in the last hour. This is inconsistent with organic growth and may indicate data anomalies, bot activity, wallet fragmentation, or airdrop/transfer mechanics not captured in the historical series.

The holder data is severely contradictory and unreliable. The 30-day historical series shows exactly 8 holders with 0 net change every day for the entire period. The current snapshot reports 788 total holders with +780 added in the last 1 hour, 24 hours, 7 days, and 30 days simultaneously — which is logically impossible if the historical series is accurate. All 788 holders acquired via swap (0 transfers, 0 airdrops). The distribution breakdown shows 0 whales, 0 sharks, 0 dolphins, 0 fish, 0 octopus, and top10/top100 concentration of 0% — all of which are data anomalies likely caused by the token's unusual supply structure (total supply = 1 with 0 decimals). No top holder data is available. This data should be treated as unreliable for investment decisions.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available — the top holders endpoint returned no data for this token

0.00%

No top holder data is available for this token. The reported top10 and top100 concentration of 0% is almost certainly a data artifact caused by the token's unusual structure (total supply of 1 with 0 decimals), which may confuse standard holder concentration calculations. With a total supply of 1 and 788 reported holders, the distribution mechanics are unclear — it is possible the token uses fractional accounting internally despite 0 decimals, or that the holder count itself is inflated. Without reliable top holder data, whale concentration and sentiment cannot be properly assessed. Given the 93.9% sell pressure and the token's micro-cap nature, the distribution health is classified as very_concentrated by default, as a small number of early holders likely control the majority of effective supply.

Liquidity$57,030
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$17,510
Sell$271,700
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers155
Unique sellers1,028

Market health is critically poor. Total liquidity of $57.03K is extremely shallow relative to the $271.70K in 24h sell volume — sellers have moved nearly 5x the entire liquidity pool in a single day. The buy/sell ratio is 6.1%/93.9%, with 1,028 unique sellers vs only 155 unique buyers (a 6.6:1 ratio). Net flow is strongly negative (outflow). The pair trades on PumpSwap (6cb8KSAuBDpDx6niXFXMTrBFALXQ5eH8j67KccFk1EDe). Slippage risk is high — any meaningful sell order will move the price significantly given the shallow pool. The FDV of $299.48K vs $57.03K liquidity means the liquidity-to-FDV ratio is only ~19%, which is low. This market structure is consistent with a token in active distribution/dump phase.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1 (zero decimals)
FDV$299.48K

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The tokenomics of this token are highly unusual and raise significant red flags. The total supply is exactly 1 with 0 decimals — an extremely atypical structure for a tradeable token. The FDV is $299.48K at the current price of $0.000299. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' and the contract is mutable, meaning the token metadata can be changed by whoever holds the update authority. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the available data. The combination of unknown/unrenounced authorities and a mutable contract creates a high rug risk from an authority perspective. The token is unverified, has no description, and the name/symbol are Chinese characters ('趁热打铁' meaning 'Strike While the Iron is Hot'). No social links beyond Twitter and Moralis are provided. The PumpSwap origin (mint ending in 'pump') is consistent with a PumpFun-launched token.

Volatility
high

Price pumped ~13x in a single candle (from $0.0000242 to $0.000364) and is already retracing. The 5-minute change is -13.46%. Extreme volatility is inherent to this token's trading pattern.

Liquidity
high

Only $57.03K in total liquidity. Sell volume of $271.70K in 24h has already exceeded the liquidity pool ~4.8x. Any significant sell order will cause severe slippage.

Concentration
high

No top holder data is available. The token's supply of 1 with 0 decimals makes standard concentration analysis impossible. The 93.9% sell pressure suggests concentrated early holders are distributing.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data available, but the trading pattern (explosive pump followed by massive sell volume from 1,028 unique sellers) is consistent with a coordinated dump. 2,487 sell transactions vs 431 buys strongly suggests early participants are exiting.

Authority
high

Update authority is unknown, contract is mutable. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. This means the token creator could potentially modify metadata, freeze accounts, or mint additional supply without warning.

Key risks

  • Overwhelming sell pressure: 93.9% of 24h volume is sells ($271.70K vs $17.51K buys)
  • Shallow liquidity ($57.03K) relative to sell volume creates extreme slippage risk
  • Mutable contract with unknown update authority — rug pull risk cannot be ruled out
  • Contradictory and unreliable holder data undermines any fundamental analysis
  • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals is an anomalous structure with unclear mechanics
  • No verified contract, no project description, no team information
  • Price already retracing: -13.46% in 5 minutes at time of analysis
  • Historical holder series (flat 8 for 30 days) contradicts current 788 holder count — possible data manipulation or bot activity

Mitigating factors

  • Token is listed on PumpSwap, providing some accessible liquidity for exit
  • The 82% 24h price gain means some early buyers may still be in profit
  • 431 buy transactions indicate some genuine market interest exists
  • No confirmed rug pull event has occurred yet at time of analysis
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand the mechanics of PumpFun/PumpSwap micro-cap tokens and are prepared to lose their entire investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana memecoin trading. Position sizing should be minimal if any exposure is taken.

趁热打铁 is a high-risk, speculative PumpSwap token with an anomalous structure (supply of 1, zero decimals) that has experienced a violent pump-and-dump pattern within its first two trading hours. The overwhelming sell pressure (93.9%), shallow liquidity, unknown authorities, and contradictory on-chain data make this an extremely high-risk asset with no identifiable fundamental value. The investment thesis is almost entirely speculative momentum-based, and the data strongly suggests the distribution phase is already underway.

Bull case (low)

A viral social media moment or coordinated community push drives a second wave of speculative buying, temporarily pushing price back toward or above the $0.000364 all-time high. The Chinese-language name and PumpFun origin could attract attention from Asian crypto communities.

  • Viral social media attention in Chinese-language crypto communities
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally
  • New liquidity injection by insiders to stabilize and re-pump
  • Short squeeze dynamics if any leveraged shorts exist

Base case

The token continues to trade with high volatility and declining volume, gradually drifting lower as sell pressure persists. Liquidity slowly depletes. The token becomes illiquid and effectively untradeable within days to weeks, consistent with the typical lifecycle of PumpFun micro-cap tokens.

  • Sell pressure remains dominant (>80% sell volume)
  • No significant new catalysts emerge
  • Liquidity pool continues to shrink as LPs withdraw
  • The token follows the typical PumpFun token lifecycle of pump, dump, and abandonment

Bear case (high)

Sell pressure continues to overwhelm the shallow $57.03K liquidity pool. Price retraces to pre-pump levels near $0.000024 or lower. The mutable contract and unknown authority create additional downside risk if the creator modifies or abandons the token.

  • Continued 93.9% sell pressure draining liquidity
  • No fundamental value or utility to attract long-term holders
  • Mutable contract risk — potential metadata change or freeze
  • Contradictory holder data suggests possible bot/wash activity that could unwind
  • Declining volume (79% drop from candle [2] to candle [1]) confirms fading momentum

GeneratedJul 13, 06:17 AM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data appears current as of the most recent candle close (2026-07-13T07:00:00Z). Historical holder series covers June 13 – July 12, 2026. Sniper and top holder data are unavailable.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Solana on-chain metadata (mint: FhxKHmrieSPZgNEwx7riXMn1FzAWzuDV6ajqqbd7pump)
  • PumpSwap pair data (6cb8KSAuBDpDx6niXFXMTrBFALXQ5eH8j67KccFk1EDe)
  • Trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets, price changes)
  • OHLC candle data (2 hourly candles, 2026-07-13)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
  • Top holder data (unavailable)
  • Sniper analysis data (unavailable)

Limitations

  • Only 2 OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • No top holder data available — whale concentration cannot be properly assessed
  • No sniper data available — smart money signals are limited
  • Contradictory holder data (historical series vs current snapshot) undermines holder trend analysis
  • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals creates anomalies in standard tokenomic calculations
  • Update authority is unknown — authority risk cannot be fully quantified
  • No project description, whitepaper, or team information available
  • The token is very new (appears to have launched within the last 24 hours based on data patterns)

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. The token analyzed exhibits multiple severe risk factors including extreme sell pressure, shallow liquidity, unknown contract authorities, and contradictory on-chain data. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose entirely. Past price performance (including the 82% 24h gain) is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1 (zero decimals)

Key Risks

Overwhelming sell pressure: 93.9% of 24h volume is sells ($271.70K vs $17.51K buys)
Shallow liquidity ($57.03K) relative to sell volume creates extreme slippage risk
Mutable contract with unknown update authority — rug pull risk cannot be ruled out
Contradictory and unreliable holder data undermines any fundamental analysis

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for this token. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper activity. However, the trading analytics paint a concerning picture: 93.9% of 24h volume is sell-side, with 1,028 unique sellers vs only 155 unique buyers. This ratio (6.6:1 sellers to buyers) strongly suggests early holders or insiders are distributing into any buy-side demand. The token's unusual structure (supply of 1, zero decimals) and the contradictory holder data further reduce confidence in any smart money assessment.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available — the sniper analysis endpoint returned no data for this token.

Strongly negative — the overwhelming sell pressure (2,487 sells vs 431 buys, $271.70K vs $17.51K) indicates early participants are aggressively exiting positions. The 1,028 unique sellers vs 155 unique buyers confirms broad distribution behavior.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for 趁热打铁 (趁热打铁)?

The 5-minute price change is already -13.46%, and 93.9% of 24h volume is sell-side ($271.70K sells vs $17.51K buys). With only $57.03K in liquidity and 2,487 sell transactions vs 431 buys, downward pressure is extreme. The most recent candle (07:00 UTC) closed at $0.000299 after opening at $0.000339, forming a bearish close. Any continuation of selling could rapidly drain the shallow liquidity pool. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000050 to $0.000350.

Is 趁热打铁 a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand the mechanics of PumpFun/PumpSwap micro-cap tokens and are prepared to lose their entire investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana memecoin trading. Position sizing should be minimal if any exposure is taken.

How are 趁热打铁 holders trending?

趁热打铁 currently has 788 holders and is growing (24h: 780, 7d: 780, 30d: 780). The holder data is severely contradictory and unreliable. The 30-day historical series shows exactly 8 holders with 0 net change every day for the entire period. The current snapshot reports 788 total holders with +780 added in the last 1 hour, 24 hours, 7 days, and 30 days simultaneously — which is logically impossible if the historical series is accurate. All 788 holders acquired via swap (0 transfers, 0 airdrops). The distribution breakdown shows 0 whales, 0 sharks, 0 dolphins, 0 fish, 0 octopus, and top10/top100 concentration of 0% — all of which are data anomalies likely caused by the token's unusual supply structure (total supply = 1 with 0 decimals). No top holder data is available. This data should be treated as unreliable for investment decisions.

What does sniper activity look like for 趁热打铁?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding 趁热打铁?

Overwhelming sell pressure: 93.9% of 24h volume is sells ($271.70K vs $17.51K buys) • Shallow liquidity ($57.03K) relative to sell volume creates extreme slippage risk • Mutable contract with unknown update authority — rug pull risk cannot be ruled out

Track 趁热打铁