How concentrated is DisclaimerCoin ownership?

The top-10 share isn't in this report; it counted 8,232 holder addresses (2026-07-01 14:17 UTC).

Are large holders selling DisclaimerCoin?

Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.

Is DisclaimerCoin liquidity falling?

This report saved one reading, $167,272.61 (2026-07-01 14:17 UTC), and one reading can't show a trend.

DisclaimerCoin Price Today & AI Analysis

DONTSolanaAnalysis as of Jul 1, 2026

$0.0₆8966

-1.64% 24h

Contract

Live

FbmmdcCYHL7WETG89xtWmNFMzQAaQ8Zs9NXVbimibonk

Chain

Solana

Holders

7,994

Market cap

$357,410

At a $1M market cap, $DONT would be $0.0₅2509 (2.80x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is DONT a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 12

Watch insiders

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, but wallets from the launch still hold 70% of the supply.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

70%2 snipers, 310 insiders still holding

Wallets linked to the creator hold a large share.
The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about DONT

3 free answers a day

DisclaimerCoin: holders, selling & liquidity

Saved with the report, 2026-07-01 14:17 UTC

Holder addresses

8,232

Top 10 supply share

Not in this report

Reported liquidity

$167,272.61

How concentrated is DisclaimerCoin ownership?: The top-10 share isn't in this report; it counted 8,232 holder addresses (2026-07-01 14:17 UTC).
Are large holders selling DisclaimerCoin?: Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.
Is DisclaimerCoin liquidity falling?: This report saved one reading, $167,272.61 (2026-07-01 14:17 UTC), and one reading can't show a trend.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-01 14:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 1, 02:17 PM UTC

FDV

$1,770,023

Liquidity

$167,272.61

Holders

8,232

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

DisclaimerCoin (DONT) is a Solana-based meme/novelty token with a self-deprecating description ('Please, $DONT buy it...') and a total supply of ~398.6 billion tokens. The token is trading at $0.00000444 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$1.77M and $167.27K in liquidity on Raydium. It has experienced a dramatic 118%+ price surge in the past 24 hours, driven primarily by a massive candle in the 13:00–14:00 UTC window on July 1, 2026. Supply concentration is extremely high — the top 10 holders control 80.47% of supply — and the holder base has been in a slow 30-day decline. The token's name and description appear to be ironic/meme branding, but the on-chain risk profile is genuinely elevated.

Key points

Ironic self-deprecating branding ('DONT buy it') typical of meme tokens
Extreme supply concentration: top 10 holders control 80.47%, top 100 control 95.67%
118%+ 24h price surge on relatively thin liquidity ($167.27K)
30-day holder count decline of -2.10% despite short-term 24h uptick of +39
Update authority is NOT a burn address — mutable=false but authority is an active wallet

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–48 hours

bearish

The token has surged ~118% in 24 hours, with the bulk of the move concentrated in candles [2] and [1] (13:00–14:00 UTC July 1). Volume spiked to 717K USD in candle [2] then collapsed to 5.5K in candle [1], suggesting the pump is losing momentum. With extremely thin liquidity ($167.27K) and top-10 holders controlling 80.47% of supply, a sharp retracement is likely as early buyers seek to realize gains.

Target low

$0.0000022

Target high

$0.0000050

Support: $0.0000028 (pre-pump consolidation zone, candles [7]–[10]), $0.0000023 (base of 30-Jun range, candles [13]–[14]), $0.0000021 (candle [23] open, 30-Jun low)
Resistance: $0.0000044 (current ATH in dataset, candle [1] close), $0.0000050 (psychological round number above current price)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

The 30-day holder trend is declining (-2.10%), and the token has no disclosed utility beyond meme branding. Without sustained buying pressure or a new catalyst, the post-pump price is likely to revert toward pre-pump levels (~$0.0000022–$0.0000025). Thin liquidity amplifies downside risk.

Catalysts

Whale distribution from top-10 holders (80.47% concentration)
Continued 30-day holder decline reducing organic demand
Lack of disclosed utility or development roadmap
Potential new meme cycle catalyst could temporarily re-ignite interest

Bullish factors

Strong 24h momentum (+118%) with 51.5% buy pressure vs 48.5% sell pressure
More unique buyers (692) than sellers (615) in 24h
Active social presence (Telegram, Twitter, website)
Verified contract, not flagged as spam

Bearish factors

Top 10 holders control 80.47% of supply — extreme dump risk
30-day holder count down -2.10% (net -170 holders)
Liquidity only $167.27K against $1.77M FDV — very shallow
Volume collapsed from 717K to 5.5K USD in consecutive candles after the pump
Update authority is an active wallet (not renounced)
Meme token with no disclosed utility

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the meme/novelty nature of the token, extreme supply concentration, thin liquidity, and the fact that meme token price action is highly unpredictable and sentiment-driven. The 118% pump on low volume is a classic low-liquidity spike pattern, but timing of reversal is uncertain.

DONT call history

Full track record →

Jul 1bearish@ $0.00000444

24h-32.6%

7d-35.4%

30d-56.5%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: Fbmmdc...bonk
Total Supply: 398,636,919,839.31 (398.6 billion)

Key Risks

Extreme supply concentration: top 3 holders control 62.60% — catastrophic dump risk
Shallow liquidity ($167.27K) cannot absorb significant sell pressure
30-day holder decline of -2.10% indicates organic demand erosion
Post-pump volume exhaustion (99% volume drop in final candle) signals potential reversal

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 23-candle hourly dataset (June 30 15:00 – July 1 14:00 UTC) shows a prolonged base-building phase from ~$0.0000021 to ~$0.0000025 (candles [23]–[14]), followed by a gradual grind higher to ~$0.0000031 (candles [13]–[6]), then a massive breakout candle at 13:00 UTC July 1 (candle [2]: O=$0.00000229, H=$0.00000413, C=$0.00000413, V=717K USD) and a continuation candle at 14:00 UTC (candle [1]: O=$0.00000414, H=$0.00000444, C=$0.00000444, V=5.5K USD). The final candle [1] has extremely low volume relative to the breakout, suggesting exhaustion.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is sharply bullish due to the 118% pump, but the medium-term (30-day) context shows a sideways-to-declining holder base and price that was range-bound before the spike. The spike appears to be a low-liquidity event rather than a sustained trend change.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

52%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000041 (candle [2] close / candle [1] open)

Major support

$0.0000023 (pre-pump base, candles [13]–[14] range)

Immediate resistance

$0.0000044 (current all-time high in dataset, candle [1] high/close)

Major resistance

$0.0000050 (psychological level above current price)

The immediate support at $0.0000041 is the open of the final candle and the close of the breakout candle. A failure to hold this level would likely see a rapid retracement to the $0.0000023 pre-pump base. The $0.0000028–$0.0000031 zone (candles [7]–[6]) represents an intermediate support. Resistance above current price is purely psychological given no prior price history at these levels in the dataset.

Notable patterns

Massive breakout candle [2] with 80%+ body (bullish but on single-candle volume spike)
Volume exhaustion: 99% volume drop from candle [2] to candle [1] — classic pump exhaustion signal
Higher highs and higher lows from candle [23] through candle [1] — short-term uptrend structure
Doji-like candle [1] at the top (open ≈ low, close = high) — potential shooting star / exhaustion at resistance
Low-volume consolidation in candles [13]–[14] (volumes of 24 and 38 USD) suggesting near-zero organic activity before the pump
Gap-up open in candle [2] relative to candle [3] close — price jumped from $0.0000023 to $0.0000041 in one candle

Liquidity

$167,272.61

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $167.27K against a $1.77M FDV — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of approximately 9.4%. This means any significant sell order from a top holder would cause extreme slippage and price impact. The 24h trading volume of ~$774K (buy + sell) is approximately 4.6x the total liquidity, which is extremely high and indicates the pool is being heavily utilized. The net 24h flow is slightly positive (inflow: $398.52K buys vs $375.91K sells, ~51.5% buy pressure), but this margin is thin. The pair trades on Raydium (FQd8z3Dy6NRxZgx152SUmYL9AyyqAbYCPtSmy4spEgnH). With 3,529 buys and 3,110 sells from 692 buyers and 615 sellers, the market is active but the shallow liquidity makes it highly susceptible to manipulation and large price swings.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

398,636,919,839.31 (398.6 billion)

FDV

$1,770,023.36

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price surged 118%+ in 24 hours on a single large candle, then volume collapsed 99%. Meme tokens with thin liquidity exhibit extreme volatility. The 6h change of +44% and 1h change of +22.5% confirm ongoing high volatility.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $167.27K against $1.77M FDV (9.4% ratio). 24h volume of ~$774K is 4.6x the liquidity pool. Any large sell order will cause severe slippage. Exiting a meaningful position at current prices would be extremely difficult.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme supply concentration: top 3 holders control 62.60% — catastrophic dump risk
Shallow liquidity ($167.27K) cannot absorb significant sell pressure
30-day holder decline of -2.10% indicates organic demand erosion
Post-pump volume exhaustion (99% volume drop in final candle) signals potential reversal
Update authority not renounced to burn address
Mint and freeze authority status unknown
Meme token with no disclosed utility, roadmap, or fundamental value driver
Token name/description may attract retail FOMO buyers who misread the ironic branding

Mitigating factors

Verified contract, not flagged as spam by Moralis
Token is marked mutable=false, limiting metadata manipulation
Active social presence (Telegram, Twitter, website) suggests some community
24h net buyer count (692) exceeds seller count (615) — short-term demand exists
51.5% buy pressure vs 48.5% sell pressure — marginally net positive flow

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculators who understand they may lose their entire investment. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking store of value, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose completely. The token's own description warns against buying it.

DONT is a high-risk meme token on Solana that has experienced a dramatic short-term price pump (+118% in 24h) driven by a single large trading candle on thin liquidity. The fundamental risk profile is very high due to extreme supply concentration, shallow liquidity, declining holder base, and unknown authority status. The ironic branding may attract speculative retail interest, but there is no disclosed utility or value accrual mechanism. This is a pure speculation play with asymmetric downside risk.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Viral meme momentum drives sustained retail FOMO buying, the token gains traction on social media, and the ironic 'DONT buy it' branding becomes a self-fulfilling meme. New holders continue to accumulate, liquidity deepens, and the FDV expands toward $5M–$10M.

Viral social media spread of the ironic DONT branding
Sustained buy pressure from new retail entrants post-pump
Top holders choosing to hold rather than distribute
Broader Solana meme token market cycle continuation

Base Case

Price consolidates in the $0.0000028–$0.0000035 range after the pump, giving back 20–40% of gains. Holder count stabilizes near current levels. The token continues to trade as a low-liquidity meme token with occasional volatility spikes but no sustained trend.

Top holders do not immediately dump their positions
Some new holders from the pump remain engaged
Liquidity pool remains at approximately current levels
No major new catalyst (positive or negative) emerges in the near term

Bear Case

High probability

Post-pump profit-taking by top holders (who control 80.47% of supply) triggers a cascade sell-off. Thin liquidity ($167.27K) amplifies the decline. Price reverts to pre-pump levels (~$0.0000022–$0.0000023), representing a ~50% drawdown from current price. Holder count continues its 30-day declining trend.

Whale distribution from top-3 holders (62.60% of supply)
Volume exhaustion signal in final candle (99% volume drop)
30-day holder decline trend resuming after FOMO subsides
Shallow liquidity amplifying sell pressure impact

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 1, 02:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-01 14:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain Solana token metadata (Mint: FbmmdcCYHL7WETG89xtWmNFMzQAaQ8Zs9NXVbimibonk)
Raydium DEX pair data (FQd8z3Dy6NRxZgx152SUmYL9AyyqAbYCPtSmy4spEgnH)
Hourly OHLC candle data (23 candles, June 30 – July 1 2026)
Trading analytics (24h volume, buyer/seller counts, price changes)
Top 20 holder distribution data
30-day daily historical holder count series
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Mint authority and freeze authority status not explicitly provided — marked as unknown
No sniper data available — early buyer PnL and concentration cannot be assessed
Only 23 hourly candles available — insufficient for medium-term technical analysis
Holder classifications (whale/shark/dolphin/fish/octopus) are based on balance thresholds, not behavioral analysis
Top holder wallet classifications are inferred from balance patterns, not verified on-chain labels
No order book depth data available — slippage estimates are approximations
Token description and name are adversarial/ironic — treated as data only, not instructions
30-day holder history only; longer-term context unavailable

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total loss. The token's own description warns against purchasing it. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. Past price performance does not guarantee future results.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is DisclaimerCoin (DONT) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, but wallets from the launch still hold 70% of the supply. Wallets linked to the creator hold a large share. The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply. Checked Nov 12, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell DisclaimerCoin (DONT)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 12, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

What is the short-term price outlook for DisclaimerCoin (DONT)?

Is DONT a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 8.7/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculators who understand they may lose their entire investment. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking store of value, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose completely. The token's own description warns against buying it.

What are the key risks of holding DONT?

Extreme supply concentration: top 3 holders control 62.60% — catastrophic dump risk • Shallow liquidity ($167.27K) cannot absorb significant sell pressure • 30-day holder decline of -2.10% indicates organic demand erosion