AWIF

Alien Wif Hat Price Prediction 2026

AWIF
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of May 11, 2026

EwXHsjQCfAAwLo7pAh77i7FbvdKkoUjdBUsGueEUpump

$0.051399

FDV $1,399

LiveContract:EwXHsjQCfAAwLo7pAh77i7FbvdKkoUjdBUsGueEUpumpChain:SolanaHolders:57Market cap:$1,399

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about AWIF

Report snapshotas of May 11, 07:18 AM
FDV

$2,312

Liquidity

$0

Holders

116

Snipers

41

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Alien Wif Hat (AWIF) is a Solana meme token launched on PumpSwap (mint: EwXHsjQCfAAwLo7pAh77i7FbvdKkoUjdBUsGueEUpump) with a total supply of 1,000,000,000 tokens. The token has experienced a catastrophic 97.05% price decline in 24 hours, dropping from ~$0.0000783 to $0.00000231. The token exhibits extreme concentration risk — the top holder (the PumpSwap liquidity pool address 5QCWyoNc1MXj11AfsLR4SUtwgnMWFVPGhM3jRr82dKu5) holds 86.95% of supply, and the top 10 wallets collectively hold 96.44%. With only 116 total holders, zero reported liquidity, and a fully diluted valuation of just $2,311.52, this is an extremely high-risk, micro-cap meme token in apparent terminal decline.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Catastrophic 97.05% 24h price crash — token is in near-total collapse
Top holder (likely DEX LP pool) controls 86.95% of supply, creating extreme concentration risk
Only 116 total holders, with 113 of them acquired in the last 24 hours — token is brand new
Zero reported on-chain liquidity despite $415K+ in 24h trading volume — severe slippage risk
20 snipers identified in first 1,000 blocks, many already in profit and likely distributing

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
24–72 hours

AWIF is in near-freefall after a 97.05% crash in 24 hours. The most recent hourly candle (07:00 UTC) opened at $0.000103, hit a high of $0.000126, then collapsed to close at $0.00000231 — a ~97.7% intra-candle crash. With zero reported liquidity, sell pressure slightly exceeding buy pressure (51.3% vs 48.7%), and snipers actively distributing, further downside is the most probable short-term outcome. Immediate support is the current price floor near $0.00000217 (candle low). Any bounce is likely a dead-cat.

Target low$0.0000010
Target high$0.0000050
Support: $0.00000217 (recent candle low), $0.0000010 (psychological floor)
Resistance: $0.0000103 (candle [1] open), $0.0000126 (candle [1] high / recent peak), $0.000111 (candle [2] close)

Medium term

bearish
1–4 weeks

With only 116 holders, no verified contract, no project description, zero liquidity, and a FDV of $2,311, AWIF has no fundamental basis for recovery. Unless a coordinated marketing push or viral meme moment occurs, the token is likely to trend toward zero. Holder growth was entirely concentrated in a single burst (113 of 116 holders acquired in the last 24h), suggesting a launch pump-and-dump dynamic rather than organic community building.

Catalysts
  • Viral meme moment or influencer promotion (low probability)
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all boats
  • Coordinated re-accumulation by early holders (speculative)

Bullish factors

  • 24h buy volume of $202.41K shows some speculative interest
  • 1,148 unique buyers in 24h suggests broad (if fleeting) retail attention
  • Meme token narrative (alien + hat) could attract viral attention

Bearish factors

  • 97.05% price crash in 24 hours — near-total value destruction
  • Zero reported on-chain liquidity — any sell order faces extreme slippage
  • Top holder controls 86.95% of supply (likely LP pool with concentrated risk)
  • Only 116 holders total — extremely thin community base
  • 20 snipers active in first 1,000 blocks, many in profit and distributing
  • No project description, unverified contract, update authority unknown
  • FDV of only $2,311.52 — effectively a micro-cap with no floor
Confidence: low. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, providing minimal technical data. The token is brand new (launched within the last 24h based on holder data), liquidity is reported as $0, and on-chain metadata is sparse. Price prediction confidence is inherently very low for such a nascent, illiquid micro-cap.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (06:00 UTC): O=$0.0000406, H=$0.0001255, L=$0.0000399, C=$0.0001108 — a strong bullish candle with a large upper wick, suggesting a pump with partial profit-taking. Candle [1] (07:00 UTC): O=$0.0001028, H=$0.0001263, L=$0.00000217, C=$0.00000231 — a catastrophic bearish engulfing/crash candle. The open was near the prior close, briefly made a new high ($0.0001263), then collapsed 97.7% to close near the absolute low. This is a classic 'rug-pull' or panic-dump candle pattern — a shooting star / bearish engulfing with an extremely long lower shadow and close at the bottom.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 49%Sell 51%

Both available candles, when read together, show a classic pump-and-dump pattern: a bullish surge in candle [2] followed by a near-total collapse in candle [1]. The trend is decisively bearish with no technical basis for reversal given available data.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.00000217 (candle [1] low)
Major$0.0000010 (psychological / near-zero floor)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0000103 (candle [1] open)
Major$0.0001263 (candle [1] high — all-time high based on available data)

The only meaningful support is the recent candle low of $0.00000217. All prior price levels from the pump phase ($0.0000399–$0.0001263) now act as overhead resistance. Recovery to even the candle [1] open (~$0.000103) would require a ~44x move from current price.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / bearish engulfing in candle [1] — classic pump-and-dump terminal candle
  • Candle [2] shows a large upper wick suggesting distribution at the top
  • Volume declining into the crash — buy-side collapse rather than aggressive selling
  • Price closed at the absolute bottom of candle [1] — no recovery attempt within the hour
  • Classic 'launch pump then dump' two-candle pattern consistent with coordinated sniper exit

Total holders116
24h Δ+113
7d Δ+113
30d Δ+113
Accelerating Growth
No

Correlation with price

Holder growth of +113 (97%) occurred entirely within the last 24 hours, coinciding with the token's launch pump phase. However, this growth has not correlated with price stability — the price crashed 97.05% during the same period. The holder surge reflects retail FOMO buyers entering during the pump, not sustained organic accumulation. Historical data shows the token had only 3 holders for the entire prior 30-day period (Apr 11 – May 10), confirming this is a brand-new launch.

The historical holder data is stark: AWIF had exactly 3 holders from April 11 through May 10, 2026 — a flat line for 30 days. Then, in a single 24-hour window (May 11), holders exploded to 116 (+113, +97%). This is the classic signature of a PumpFun/PumpSwap launch: a pre-launch phase with only the deployer and a handful of insiders, followed by a public launch with rapid retail onboarding. The 3 pre-launch holders likely represent the deployer, a team wallet, and possibly a sniper. Growth is NOT accelerating — it was a single burst event, and with the price now down 97%, new holder acquisition is likely to stall or reverse as holders sell at a loss.

Top 10 hold96.44%
Top 100 hold99.95%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

5QCWyoNc1MXj11AfsLR4SUtwgnMWFVPGhM3jRr82dKu5

DEX liquidity pool (PumpSwap pair address — same as the trading pair listed in price data)

86.95%

3TnhxdrmkBy884hCznyZ95avQz5Fe6cH4V82uzQY8yKp

Individual whale / early insider

4.24%

9nihr5txCGhbS4895oExjwQ8zEnzXv1ffaq1eS7byybj

Individual whale

1.13%

2NuAgVk3hcb7s4YvP4GjV5fD8eDvZQv5wuN6ZC8igRfV

Individual whale

0.85%

DZbgq3yE3r41EFszV3XastvyS8j8QnmNT37nsq7sxR66

Individual whale

0.80%

Token distribution is extremely unhealthy. The #1 holder at 86.95% is address 5QCWyoNc1MXj11AfsLR4SUtwgnMWFVPGhM3jRr82dKu5 — this is the same address listed as the PumpSwap trading pair, indicating it is the DEX liquidity pool contract holding the vast majority of supply. This is a critical red flag: it means the effective circulating supply outside the LP is only ~13%, and the LP itself is severely imbalanced. The #2 holder at 4.24% (42.4M tokens) is an individual wallet that likely represents an early insider or large sniper. Holders #3–#10 each hold between 0.39%–1.13%, suggesting a small cluster of early buyers. The top 10 collectively hold 96.44% and the top 100 hold 99.95%, leaving only 0.05% of supply distributed beyond the top 100 — an extraordinarily concentrated distribution.

Liquidity$0.00
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$202,410
Sell$213,490
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers1,148
Unique sellers1,265

On-chain liquidity is reported as $0.00, which is a critical red flag. Despite $415,900 in combined 24h trading volume (1,904 buys, 2,088 sells), the pool appears to have been drained or is effectively empty. This creates extreme slippage risk — any attempt to sell even a small position could move the price dramatically. The net flow is negative (outflow): sell volume ($213.49K) exceeds buy volume ($202.41K) by ~$11K, and sellers (1,265) outnumber buyers (1,148). The 24h price change reported by the analytics module shows 0% for 5m/1h/6h/24h timeframes, which likely reflects a data anomaly given the actual 97.05% crash — possibly because the pool is empty and no new price discovery is occurring. The token is effectively illiquid at current prices.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1,000,000,000 AWIF
FDV$2,311.52

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token has a standard 1 billion supply with 6 decimals, consistent with PumpFun/PumpSwap launch templates. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' and the contract is not verified, making it impossible to confirm whether mint or freeze authorities have been renounced. The token is marked as 'mutable: false' which is a mild positive signal (metadata cannot be changed), but without confirmed authority renouncement, the risk remains unknown. The FDV of $2,311.52 reflects the near-total price collapse — at launch the FDV was likely in the $50K–$200K range based on the peak price of ~$0.000126. No description, no whitepaper, and no website are provided. Social presence is limited to Telegram and Moralis links.

Volatility
high

97.05% price crash in 24 hours. The token went from ~$0.000126 to $0.00000231 in a single hourly candle — extreme volatility consistent with a pump-and-dump event.

Liquidity
high

Total on-chain liquidity reported as $0.00. Despite $415K in 24h volume, the pool appears drained. Any sell order faces catastrophic slippage with no meaningful exit liquidity.

Concentration
high

Top 10 holders control 96.44% of supply. The #1 holder (DEX LP) holds 86.95%. Excluding the LP, the next largest holder controls 4.24%. Distribution is among the most concentrated possible.

SniperDump
high

20 snipers identified in the first 1,000 blocks. Most show positive realized PnL (up to +123%), indicating they have been actively selling into retail demand. The largest sniper sold $3,319 at +72.9% profit. Remaining sniper balances are minimal, suggesting the dump is largely complete.

Authority
medium

Update authority is 'unknown' and the contract is unverified. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. The token is marked 'mutable: false' which provides some protection, but full authority renouncement cannot be verified from available data.

Key risks

  • Near-zero liquidity ($0.00 reported) makes exit impossible without catastrophic slippage
  • 97% price crash in 24h — capital is effectively destroyed for most holders
  • 86.95% of supply in a single address (LP pool) — extreme concentration
  • Unverified contract with unknown authority status — potential for further manipulation
  • Only 116 holders with no organic community or utility
  • Snipers have largely exited at profit, leaving retail holders with losses
  • No project description, whitepaper, or verifiable team — anonymous launch

Mitigating factors

  • Token marked as 'mutable: false' — metadata cannot be altered
  • Not flagged as spam by on-chain detection systems
  • 1,148 unique buyers in 24h shows some genuine retail interest (though likely already at a loss)
  • Meme token narrative (alien + hat) has viral potential in the right market conditions
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for extremely high-risk-tolerant speculators who treat any position as a total loss. It is NOT suitable for investors seeking capital preservation, income, or even moderate risk exposure. Given the 97% crash, zero liquidity, and extreme concentration, any new capital deployed is at near-total risk of permanent loss.

AWIF is a brand-new Solana meme token that has already experienced a near-total collapse (-97.05%) within its first 24 hours of trading. The token exhibits every hallmark of a coordinated pump-and-dump: pre-launch insider accumulation (3 holders for 30 days), a rapid public launch pump, sniper activity in the first 1,000 blocks, and a catastrophic crash as early buyers exited. With zero liquidity, 116 holders, and a FDV of $2,311, the token has no fundamental value proposition. The only speculative case for recovery is a viral meme moment, which is low probability.

Bull case (low)

Viral meme revival: The 'alien wif hat' narrative catches on in the broader Solana meme coin community, attracting influencer attention and a new wave of retail buyers. Liquidity is re-added to the pool, price recovers to the $0.00001–$0.00005 range, and the holder base expands to 1,000+.

  • Viral social media moment or influencer promotion
  • Broader Solana meme coin bull market
  • Community-led liquidity injection and marketing campaign
  • Low entry price ($0.00000231) attracts bottom-fishers

Base case

Slow bleed to near-zero: The token maintains minimal trading activity from bottom-fishers and speculators, with occasional small pumps that attract brief attention before fading. Price stabilizes in the $0.000001–$0.000003 range for weeks before becoming effectively inactive.

  • Some residual speculative interest from the meme narrative
  • No new liquidity injection from the team or community
  • Holder count remains below 200 with no organic growth
  • Price remains 95%+ below launch peak

Bear case (high)

Terminal decline: With zero liquidity, no community, no utility, and snipers already exited, the token drifts toward zero. The remaining 116 holders are unable to exit due to lack of liquidity, and the token becomes a ghost chain artifact.

  • Zero on-chain liquidity prevents meaningful price recovery
  • Snipers and early insiders have already extracted value
  • No project fundamentals, team, or roadmap to attract new capital
  • Retail holders trapped at 97% loss with no exit
  • Broader market indifference to yet another anonymous meme token

GeneratedMay 11, 07:18 AM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 2026-05-11T07:00–08:00 UTC. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, limiting technical analysis depth.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Solana on-chain metadata (mint, supply, decimals, mutability)
  • PumpSwap OHLC price data (hourly candles)
  • Trading analytics (24h volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
  • Holder distribution and historical holder time series
  • Top 20 holder wallet addresses and balances
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks, 20 wallets)
  • Moralis token API

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Total liquidity reported as $0.00 — may reflect data lag or pool drainage; exact state uncertain
  • Sniper USD amounts sniped are 'unknown' — sniper concentration % is estimated
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are unknown — cannot confirm renouncement
  • No project description, whitepaper, or team information available for fundamental analysis
  • Historical holder data shows only 3 holders for 30 days prior to launch — limited baseline
  • Price change fields in analytics show 0% for all timeframes despite 97% crash — possible data anomaly
  • FDV reported as $0.00 in analytics but $2,311.52 in metadata — discrepancy noted; metadata figure used

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Investing in micro-cap meme tokens carries extreme risk of total capital loss. The analyst has no position in AWIF. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1,000,000,000 AWIF

Key Risks

Near-zero liquidity ($0.00 reported) makes exit impossible without catastrophic slippage
97% price crash in 24h — capital is effectively destroyed for most holders
86.95% of supply in a single address (LP pool) — extreme concentration
Unverified contract with unknown authority status — potential for further manipulation

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

medium confidence
High risk

Of 20 identified snipers, the majority show positive realized PnL percentages, indicating they entered early and have been selling into retail demand. The largest sniper exit was $3,319 at +72.9% profit (CiQizNJ6vpx4cZix81YDrecoWALV2AVmNsmgbanb33T9). Several snipers show 0% realized PnL, suggesting they either haven't sold or sold at breakeven. Only 3 snipers still show non-zero balances (F85Y3Wg35nEdsF5KLWisgKsPZaPAL4M5aninZGxYfy31 with $26, 7C1BXcBCvHJGb1DT87L51keUTPKyvk9kCZGNfnX1jVX1 with $165). The sniper cohort appears to have largely exited, consistent with the 97% price crash.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration2.00%
PnL stateMostly In Profit
Sell-through rateModerate
Profit-taking risk
high

Sniper data shows 20 wallets active in first 1,000 blocks. Individual snipe amounts in USD are unknown, but realized PnL percentages range from 0% to 123%. Notable high-profit snipers: jZqvLmTcXKuDC3Pajg4WMfKWf6woMpjVkrvb1iouyfY (+123.0%, sold $387), FqbjSyLKpSuxVpHZtvp4HMaV8xhuh5hzTWf4gKMfhFbQ (+119.8%, sold $361), Hz8nhos58ymRCuduX7NuHYCpkL59XND1aR79Z7Lwa3en (+83.5%, sold $33), CiQizNJ6vpx4cZix81YDrecoWALV2AVmNsmgbanb33T9 (+72.9%, sold $3,319 — largest single sniper exit).

Early buyers (snipers) are predominantly in profit and have been actively distributing. The largest exits occurred at significant gains (up to +123%), suggesting the token served its purpose as a short-term pump vehicle for informed early entrants. Remaining sniper balances are minimal, indicating most have already exited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for Alien Wif Hat (AWIF)?

AWIF is in near-freefall after a 97.05% crash in 24 hours. The most recent hourly candle (07:00 UTC) opened at $0.000103, hit a high of $0.000126, then collapsed to close at $0.00000231 — a ~97.7% intra-candle crash. With zero reported liquidity, sell pressure slightly exceeding buy pressure (51.3% vs 48.7%), and snipers actively distributing, further downside is the most probable short-term outcome. Immediate support is the current price floor near $0.00000217 (candle low). Any bounce is likely a dead-cat. Short-term outlook is bearish (24–72 hours), with a target range of $0.0000010 to $0.0000050.

Is AWIF a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.5/100. This token is suitable ONLY for extremely high-risk-tolerant speculators who treat any position as a total loss. It is NOT suitable for investors seeking capital preservation, income, or even moderate risk exposure. Given the 97% crash, zero liquidity, and extreme concentration, any new capital deployed is at near-total risk of permanent loss.

How are AWIF holders trending?

Alien Wif Hat currently has 116 holders and is growing (24h: 113, 7d: 113, 30d: 113). The historical holder data is stark: AWIF had exactly 3 holders from April 11 through May 10, 2026 — a flat line for 30 days. Then, in a single 24-hour window (May 11), holders exploded to 116 (+113, +97%). This is the classic signature of a PumpFun/PumpSwap launch: a pre-launch phase with only the deployer and a handful of insiders, followed by a public launch with rapid retail onboarding. The 3 pre-launch holders likely represent the deployer, a team wallet, and possibly a sniper. Growth is NOT accelerating — it was a single burst event, and with the price now down 97%, new holder acquisition is likely to stall or reverse as holders sell at a loss.

What does sniper activity look like for AWIF?

Snipers hold roughly 2.00% of supply with PnL state "mostly_in_profit" and sell-through rate "moderate". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding AWIF?

Near-zero liquidity ($0.00 reported) makes exit impossible without catastrophic slippage • 97% price crash in 24h — capital is effectively destroyed for most holders • 86.95% of supply in a single address (LP pool) — extreme concentration

Track AWIF