ZARD

Charizard Capital Price Today & AI Analysis

ZARDSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 1, 2026

Price

$0.043065

+2.89% 24h

Contract

Live
EebvSxfGbjyHMJ2bu1jhtNidbhVbQJtcg9y561Kipump

Chain

Solana

Holders

3,524

Market cap

$30,624

At a $1M market cap, $ZARD would be $0.001001 (32.7x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Ask Unhosted AI about ZARD

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Whale activityWhat are the risks?Should I buy?

More tokens on Solana

DEXBULLDEXBULLThe Dextools Bull$0.041680+8.2%MC $11.0KMOLTMOLTMonkey Cult$0.000124+1.0%MC $123.5KSTARSSTARSstars.actor$0.053690-10.8%MC $3.5KOGOGOG$0.053448-39.0%MC $3.2KCOMMIECOMMIECommie Coin$0.059404-7.3%MC $9.4KZECZECZcash$1,178.6-8.8%MC $117.88M

Charizard Capital: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-01 00:17 UTC

Holder addresses

3,565

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$47,182.91
How concentrated is Charizard Capital ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 3,565 addresses (2026-06-01 00:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Charizard Capital?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Charizard Capital liquidity falling?
As of 2026-06-01 00:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $47,182.91. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-01 00:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jun 1, 12:17 AM UTC

FDV

$128,300

Liquidity

$47,182.91

Holders

3,565

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Charizard Capital (ZARD) is a Solana meme/community token launched on PumpSwap with a total supply of ~999.1M tokens and a current FDV of ~$128K–$168K. The token has experienced an explosive 24h price surge of ~159%, driven by a sharp spike in the most recent candles. However, this rally is accompanied by heavily skewed sell pressure (80.1% sell volume), shallow liquidity ($47.18K), and a 30-day declining holder trend. The project is themed around a 'Strategic Charizard Reserve,' positioning itself as a meme/community token. No snipers were detected at launch, which is a positive signal, but concentration risk is elevated with the top 10 holders controlling 44.6% of supply.

Key points

  • Zero sniper activity in the first 1000 blocks — clean launch
  • Explosive 24h price action (+159%) suggesting sudden viral momentum
  • Mutable metadata is false, reducing certain manipulation vectors
  • PumpSwap-native launch with no verified contract — typical for pump.fun ecosystem tokens
  • 30-day holder decline (-4.2%) contrasts sharply with the 24h price spike, suggesting speculative rather than organic growth

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–48 hours

bearish

The token has surged ~159% in 24h, reaching $0.0001284 from a base of ~$0.0000498. The most recent 5-minute data shows a -6.58% pullback, and sell pressure dominates at 80.1% of 24h volume ($55.43K sells vs $13.80K buys). A mean-reversion correction is highly probable in the short term. Support is thin given the shallow $47.18K liquidity pool.

Target low

$0.000065

Target high

$0.000168

Support

$0.000065 (candle [4] low / recent consolidation zone), $0.000050 (pre-spike base, candles [8]–[20] range)

Resistance

$0.000129 (candle [1] close / current area), $0.000168 (candle [1] intraday high — 24h peak)

Medium term · 7–30 days

neutral

Medium-term outlook is uncertain. The 30-day holder trend is negative (-150 holders, -4.2%), suggesting the community has been shrinking prior to this spike. Sustained price appreciation would require new holder acquisition and genuine community growth. Without a catalyst or viral moment, the token may revert toward pre-spike levels (~$0.000050).

Catalysts

  • Viral social media moment or influencer endorsement
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • New utility or partnership announcement
  • Sustained holder growth reversing the 30-day decline

Bullish factors

  • Zero sniper activity — no early predatory wallets waiting to dump
  • Strong 24h price momentum (+159%) may attract momentum traders
  • Mutable=false reduces certain rug vectors
  • 24h holder count up +37 (+1%), showing some new entrant interest
  • No spam classification from data providers

Bearish factors

  • 80.1% sell pressure in 24h ($55.43K sells vs $13.80K buys)
  • 30-day holder decline of -150 holders (-4.2%)
  • Shallow liquidity of only $47.18K — large trades will cause severe slippage
  • Top 10 holders control 44.6% of supply — concentrated dump risk
  • Unverified contract, meme theme with no clear utility
  • 5-minute price already down -6.58% from recent peak
  • FDV of only ~$128K–$168K limits institutional interest

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the meme token nature of ZARD, extremely shallow liquidity ($47.18K), heavy sell-side dominance (80.1%), and the speculative nature of the 24h price spike. Price action in this asset class is highly unpredictable and driven by social sentiment rather than fundamentals.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
EebvSx...pump
Total Supply
999,104,173.01

Key Risks

  • Extreme sell pressure: 80.1% of 24h volume is sells ($55.43K vs $13.80K buys)
  • Shallow liquidity ($47.18K) creates high slippage and exit risk
  • 30-day holder decline of -150 holders (-4.2%) indicates weakening community
  • Top 2 non-LP holders control ~16.73% of supply — concentrated dump risk

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 24-hour OHLC series reveals two distinct phases. Candles [24]–[9] (hours 1–16 of the lookback) show extreme price compression between ~$0.0000488 and ~$0.0000578, with very low volume (often under $200/hr), indicating a dormant/accumulation phase. A breakout begins at candle [8] (~17:00 UTC May 31) and accelerates sharply through candles [6]–[2], with volume surging to $40K+ in candle [2]. Candle [1] (most recent) shows a dramatic expansion: Open $0.0000681, High $0.0001686, Low $0.0001294, Close $0.0001294 — a bearish close relative to the high, suggesting a potential shooting star or wick rejection at the top. Volume in candle [1] drops to $9.4K vs $40K in candle [2], indicating fading momentum.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is technically an uptrend given the explosive move from ~$0.000050 to $0.0001284, but the most recent candle shows a bearish upper wick rejection at $0.0001686 with a lower close at $0.0001294. Medium-term (30-day context) the token was in a sideways-to-declining range before this spike.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

20%

Sell

80%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0001294 (candle [1] close / low)

Major support

$0.000050 (pre-spike base, candles [8]–[20] consolidation zone)

Immediate resistance

$0.0001686 (candle [1] intraday high — 24h peak)

Major resistance

$0.0001686 (all-time high within this data window)

The immediate support at $0.0001294 is the candle [1] close. A break below this level opens a path to the $0.000065 area (candle [4] low) and ultimately the pre-spike base of ~$0.000050. Resistance is the 24h high of $0.0001686. Given the thin liquidity, these levels can be breached rapidly.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / bearish upper wick on candle [1]: High of $0.0001686 with close at $0.0001294 — classic rejection pattern at highs
  • Volume climax at candle [2] ($40K) followed by declining volume on candle [1] ($9.4K) — potential exhaustion
  • Extended low-volume consolidation (candles [9]–[24]) followed by explosive breakout — classic pump pattern
  • Higher highs and higher lows from candle [6] through candle [1] — short-term uptrend structure intact but fragile
  • Candle [2] is a bullish engulfing relative to prior candles, but candle [1]'s wick rejection tempers the signal

Liquidity

Liquidity

$47,182.91

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Market health is poor. Total liquidity of $47.18K is extremely shallow for a token with a $128K–$168K FDV, representing roughly 28–37% of FDV in liquidity — while this ratio sounds reasonable, the absolute dollar amount means any trade above ~$2K–$5K will cause significant slippage. The 24h trading data reveals a stark imbalance: 335 unique sellers vs 203 unique buyers, with sell volume ($55.43K) outpacing buy volume ($13.80K) by a ratio of 4:1. Net flow is clearly outflow. The 1,225 sell transactions vs 734 buy transactions further confirms distribution pressure. Despite the price spike, the market structure is bearish — price rose on relatively thin buy volume while sellers have been consistently active. This is consistent with a low-float pump where a small number of buys can move price significantly, but sustained upward movement requires much greater buy-side participation.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,104,173.01

FDV

$128,300 (price data) / $168,430 (analytics data)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Token has surged 159% in 24h from a micro-cap base. 5-minute price is already -6.58%. Hourly swings of 80%+ are observed. Extreme volatility is inherent to this asset class and liquidity level.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $47.18K. Any position above ~$2K–$5K will face severe slippage. Exit liquidity is extremely limited, especially during a sell-off when liquidity providers may withdraw.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extreme sell pressure: 80.1% of 24h volume is sells ($55.43K vs $13.80K buys)
  • Shallow liquidity ($47.18K) creates high slippage and exit risk
  • 30-day holder decline of -150 holders (-4.2%) indicates weakening community
  • Top 2 non-LP holders control ~16.73% of supply — concentrated dump risk
  • Mint authority status unknown — potential inflation risk
  • Unverified contract on pump.fun ecosystem
  • Price spike appears driven by thin buy volume — susceptible to rapid reversal
  • Meme token with no clear utility beyond community/theme

Mitigating factors

  • Zero sniper activity at launch — fair distribution start
  • Mutable=false — metadata cannot be altered
  • No spam classification from data providers
  • 3,565 holders provides some distribution breadth
  • PumpSwap listing provides basic DEX infrastructure
  • 24h holder count up +37, showing some new interest

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced crypto traders who understand meme token dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are actively monitoring positions. Not suitable for long-term investors, risk-averse individuals, or those unfamiliar with Solana DeFi mechanics. Position sizing should be minimal relative to portfolio.

ZARD is a high-risk, speculative meme token on Solana that has experienced a sharp 24h price spike (+159%) from a low base. The clean launch (zero snipers) and Mutable=false metadata are positive structural signals, but these are outweighed by severe sell pressure, shallow liquidity, declining 30-day holder trends, and high supply concentration. The token is best characterized as a short-term momentum trade with very high downside risk rather than a medium-to-long-term investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Viral social media momentum drives a sustained wave of new buyers. The 'Strategic Charizard Reserve' meme gains traction in the broader crypto community, attracting influencer attention. New holders flood in, liquidity deepens, and the token achieves a 5x–10x from current levels, pushing FDV toward $640K–$1.28M.

  • Viral meme spread on Twitter/X or TikTok
  • Influencer endorsement or listing on a meme aggregator
  • Broader Solana meme season with rising tide lifting all boats
  • Sustained holder growth reversing the 30-day decline
  • Whale accumulation rather than distribution

Base Case

Price consolidates in the $0.000065–$0.000100 range after the initial pump fades. Some new holders attracted by the spike remain, partially offsetting the 30-day decline. The token trades sideways with low volume, maintaining a FDV of $65K–$100K. Without a new catalyst, gradual holder attrition resumes.

  • Sell pressure moderates but buy pressure remains weak
  • No major whale dumps in the near term
  • Liquidity pool remains intact
  • No new viral catalyst emerges
  • Holder count stabilizes around 3,500–3,600

Bear Case

High probability

The 24h pump exhausts buy-side momentum. Large holders (#2 and #3, controlling ~16.73% combined) begin selling into remaining liquidity. Price reverts to pre-spike levels of ~$0.000050, representing a ~61% decline from current price. Continued holder attrition accelerates the decline.

  • 80.1% sell pressure continues or intensifies
  • Whale distribution from top non-LP holders
  • Liquidity withdrawal from the PumpSwap pool
  • Failure to attract new holders post-pump
  • Broader Solana market downturn

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 1, 12:17 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-01 00:17 UTC

Model confidence

Medium

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (mint, decimals, supply, authority fields)
  • PumpSwap DEX price and OHLC data (hourly candles, 24h)
  • Trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets, price changes)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data (top 20 holders, historical 30-day series)
  • Sniper analysis (first 1000 blocks post-launch)

Limitations

  • Mint authority and freeze authority status not explicitly provided — assessed as unknown
  • Sniper data shows 0 snipers but total sniped USD and transactions are unknown — may reflect data limitation rather than confirmed zero
  • Top holder classifications are inferred from context (LP address match) and wallet behavior — not confirmed on-chain labels
  • No order book depth data available — slippage estimates are approximations
  • Historical holder data only covers 30 days — longer-term trends unavailable
  • No social sentiment data or on-chain transaction graph analysis performed
  • FDV discrepancy between price data ($128.3K) and analytics data ($168.4K) reflects rapidly moving price during data collection

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Charizard Capital ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 3,565 addresses (2026-06-01 00:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Charizard Capital?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Charizard Capital liquidity falling?

As of 2026-06-01 00:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $47,182.91. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Charizard Capital (ZARD)?

The token has surged ~159% in 24h, reaching $0.0001284 from a base of ~$0.0000498. The most recent 5-minute data shows a -6.58% pullback, and sell pressure dominates at 80.1% of 24h volume ($55.43K sells vs $13.80K buys). A mean-reversion correction is highly probable in the short term. Support is thin given the shallow $47.18K liquidity pool. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–48 hours), with a target range of $0.000065 to $0.000168.

Is ZARD a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 8.5/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced crypto traders who understand meme token dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are actively monitoring positions. Not suitable for long-term investors, risk-averse individuals, or those unfamiliar with Solana DeFi mechanics. Position sizing should be minimal relative to portfolio.

What are the key risks of holding ZARD?

Extreme sell pressure: 80.1% of 24h volume is sells ($55.43K vs $13.80K buys) • Shallow liquidity ($47.18K) creates high slippage and exit risk • 30-day holder decline of -150 holders (-4.2%) indicates weakening community

← Back to all predictions

Questions about ZARD?