OG

OG Price Today & AI Analysis

OGSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 24, 2026

Price

$0.000306

+20426.08% 24h

Contract

Live
7WzgckLJdTN63McbELyFAN46DEwqBVDyGbGPDXgS22KS

Chain

Holders

569

Market cap

$292,490

More tokens on Solana

OG: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-24 21:45 UTC

Holder addresses

569

Top 10 supply share

16.37%

Reported liquidity

$78,581.00
How concentrated is OG ownership?
As of 2026-09-24 21:45 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 16.37% of supply. It reports 569 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling OG?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-24 21:45 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $310,849.00 in buys and $319,410.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is OG liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +7089.45%, from $1,548.32 (2026-09-24 04:00 UTC) to $111,315.51 (2026-09-24 21:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-24 21:45 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-24 04:00 UTC$1,548.32
2026-09-24 08:00 UTC$1,902.90
2026-09-24 09:00 UTC$16,805.79
2026-09-24 10:00 UTC$33,270.07
2026-09-24 11:00 UTC$31,039.76
2026-09-24 12:00 UTC$31,230.38
2026-09-24 13:00 UTC$24,576.34
2026-09-24 14:00 UTC$19,962.60
2026-09-24 15:00 UTC$20,397.23
2026-09-24 16:00 UTC$19,576.38
2026-09-24 17:00 UTC$25,331.88
2026-09-24 18:00 UTC$21,899.61
2026-09-24 19:00 UTC$65,781.71
2026-09-24 20:00 UTC$103,571.11
2026-09-24 21:00 UTC$111,315.51

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about OG

Continue in chat

Report snapshot

as of Sep 24, 09:46 PM UTC

FDV

$292,490

Liquidity

$78,581.00

Holders

569

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

OG (mint 7WzgckLJdTN63McbELyFAN46DEwqBVDyGbGPDXgS22KS) is a newly-launched Solana token trading on a Meteora dynamic bonding curve pair, described only as a 'Test Token' with no social links. It has an FDV of ~$292.49K on total supply of ~954.77M tokens, and has experienced extreme volatility — surging roughly 20,426% over the reported 24h window before pulling back sharply (-24.3% in the last hour, -30.8% in the last 5 minutes). Liquidity is thin at $78.58K against over $630K in combined 24h volume, and critical safety data (mint/freeze authority status, sniper activity, holder history) is unavailable, leaving major unknowns in the risk picture.

Key points

  • Extreme, rapid price appreciation followed by an equally rapid pullback within the same trading day
  • Very shallow liquidity ($78.58K) relative to trading volume, indicating a nascent, thinly-traded market
  • Multiple critical data gaps (authorities, sniper coverage, holder history) prevent a full risk clearance
  • No social presence or project transparency beyond a generic 'Test Token' description

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · next 1-6 hours

bearish

Momentum has turned sharply negative in the most recent candles: price fell from a high of $0.000628 (hour 17) to $0.000306 by hour 18, and the -24.3% (1h) and -30.8% (5m) readings suggest the pullback is accelerating. Absent fresh buy volume, continued downside toward recent intraday support levels is likely, though shallow liquidity means sharp bounces are also possible.

Target low

$0.000195

Target high

$0.000490

Support

$0.000195 (hour 17 low), $0.0000698-0.0000722 (hours 15-16 lows, prior consolidation zone)

Resistance

$0.000490 (hour 18 high), $0.000628 (hour 17 high, session peak)

Medium term · 1-3 days

neutral

Given the token's very short trading history (~18 hours) and pump-and-dump-like price shape (near-vertical rise from ~$0.0000015 to $0.000628, now retracing), medium-term direction is highly uncertain. Sustainability depends on whether new liquidity and buyer interest emerge or whether the token continues to bleed toward its earlier consolidation range near $0.00005-0.0001.

Catalysts

  • Whether liquidity depth increases meaningfully beyond the current $78.58K
  • Continued unique buyer participation (currently 1,669 in 24h) versus seller dominance
  • Any resolution of unknowns around mint/freeze authority that could restore or damage confidence
  • Potential migration off the bonding curve to a standard AMM pool if volume thresholds are met

Bullish factors

  • High number of unique 24h buyers (1,669) indicating active retail interest
  • Buy volume ($310.85K) is nearly on par with sell volume ($319.41K), not showing a one-sided collapse yet

Bearish factors

  • Sharp recent reversals: -24.3% in the last hour and -30.8% in the last 5 minutes
  • Shallow $78.58K liquidity magnifies downside moves and slippage
  • Classic parabolic-spike-then-retrace candle shape often precedes further downside
  • Unknown authority settings and no social/verification presence reduce confidence in sustained demand

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because the trading history spans only ~18 hourly candles on a bonding-curve pair with extreme volatility, liquidity is shallow enough that price action can be easily distorted by individual trades, and key fundamental risk inputs (authorities, sniper activity, holder history) are entirely missing, preventing a well-grounded directional call.

OG call history

Full track record →

Sep 24bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
7Wzgck...22KS
Total Supply
954,772,406.33 OG

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($78.58K) relative to 24h volume (~$630K combined), creating high slippage and thin exit liquidity
  • Mint/freeze authority status unknown — possibility that supply can be inflated or accounts frozen cannot be ruled out
  • No sniper coverage data available, so early-buyer dump risk cannot be quantified
  • Token described only as 'Test Token' with no social links and unknown contract verification status, indicating minimal transparency

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Over the 18 most recent hourly candles, OG went from a near-flat, illiquid start (hours 1-5 trading between $0.0000015-0.0000021 with several zero-volume hours) into a parabolic advance beginning hour 6, spiking from $0.0000021 to a local high of $0.000629 by hour 17, before closing hour 18 at $0.000307 — roughly a 51% pullback from the session high. Volume expanded massively alongside the price spike (V:48,860 at hour 6, V:104,066 at hour 7, V:249,951 at hour 17), confirming the move was volume-driven rather than a low-liquidity artifact alone, though such volume against only $78.58K of pool liquidity implies very high turnover and price impact per trade.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Medium-term (18h) trend remains a steep uptrend given the token started near $0.0000015 and now trades near $0.000306-0.000307, but the short-term (last 1-2 hours) trend has turned down sharply, with price nearly halving from the hour-17 high of $0.000628 to the hour-18 close of $0.000307, and further declines of -24.3% (1h) and -30.8% (5m) reported intraday.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

49%

Sell

51%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000195 (hour 17 intraday low)

Major support

$0.0000698 (hour 16 low) / broader base near $0.0000536-0.0000570 (hours 12-13 lows)

Immediate resistance

$0.000490 (hour 18 high)

Major resistance

$0.000628 (hour 17 high, all-time session peak)

The candle series shows a clear base-building phase (hours 1-5, ~$0.0000015-0.0000021), a breakout and parabolic run (hours 6-17, topping at $0.000628), and now an early-stage retracement (hour 18 close $0.000307). Key support to watch is the $0.000195-0.000208 zone from hour 17-18 lows; a break below could open a path back toward the $0.00007-0.0001 consolidation band from hours 11-16. On the upside, reclaiming and holding above $0.000490 would be needed to challenge the $0.000628 session high.

Notable patterns

  • Parabolic breakout candle at hour 6 (O:0.00000215 to C:0.0000462, ~20x in one hour) on a volume surge from 0 to 48,860
  • Blow-off-top style candle at hour 17 (wide range $0.000195-$0.000628 with V:249,951) followed by a large red/retracement candle into hour 18
  • Several consecutive flat, zero-volume candles at the start (hours 2-4) indicating minimal early trading activity before the pump began
  • Sharp intraday reversal in the last hour/5 minutes (-24.3%/-30.8%) suggesting momentum exhaustion after the spike

Liquidity

Liquidity

$78,581.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total pool liquidity is only $78.58K against a 24h trading volume of over $630K combined (buy $310.85K + sell $319.41K), implying a liquidity turnover ratio of roughly 8x in a single day — a classic signature of a freshly launched, thinly-liquid token on a bonding-curve style pair (Meteora DBC). With liquidity this shallow relative to volume, price impact per trade is likely to be significant, and slippage risk is high for anything beyond small trade sizes. Sell volume ($319.41K) marginally exceeds buy volume ($310.85K), producing a slight net outflow bias (50.7% sell vs 49.3% buy pressure), though the split is close to balanced. There are more unique buyers (1,669) than sellers (1,299) and more buy transactions (3,512) than sell transactions (2,765), suggesting broad retail participation on both sides but slightly more aggressive/larger-size selling dominating dollar volume. This combination of shallow liquidity and heavy volume is consistent with high volatility and elevated rug/dump risk typical of very early-stage tokens.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

954,772,406.33 OG

FDV

$292,490

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change is reported at approximately +20,426%, and the hourly candles show the price moving from ~$0.0000015 to a high of ~$0.000628 then pulling back to ~$0.000307 within about 18 hours. Very recent 5m (-30.8%) and 1h (-24.3%) changes confirm extreme, ongoing volatility in both directions.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $78.58K versus over $630K in 24h combined volume, and the pair trades on a Meteora dynamic bonding curve — this shallow liquidity base means even moderate trade sizes could move price substantially, raising both slippage and exit-liquidity risk.

  • Concentrationunknown

    Only a top-10 snapshot concentration of 16.37% of supply is available; top-100 concentration, historical accumulation trends, and wallet classifications (team/insider/bot) are not available, so true concentration risk cannot be fully assessed and should be treated as unknown rather than benign.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($78.58K) relative to 24h volume (~$630K combined), creating high slippage and thin exit liquidity
  • Mint/freeze authority status unknown — possibility that supply can be inflated or accounts frozen cannot be ruled out
  • No sniper coverage data available, so early-buyer dump risk cannot be quantified
  • Token described only as 'Test Token' with no social links and unknown contract verification status, indicating minimal transparency
  • Extreme volatility (24h change ~20,426%, with sharp -24% to -31% pullbacks in the last hour/5 minutes) typical of pump-and-dump-prone early-stage tokens
  • Holder concentration data limited to a single snapshot (top-10 = 16.37%); no historical trend to assess whether whales are accumulating or preparing to exit

Mitigating factors

  • Reasonably high number of unique 24h participants (1,669 buyers, 1,299 sellers), suggesting some organic retail interest rather than a single-wallet-dominated market
  • Buy/sell volume is roughly balanced (49.3%/50.7%), not showing an overwhelming one-sided dump at this snapshot

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand the possibility of total capital loss. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking predictable returns, or anyone unable to independently verify authority settings and contract safety before trading. Position sizing should be minimal given the very_high risk classification.

OG is a very-early-stage, low-liquidity Solana token trading on a Meteora dynamic bonding curve that has seen an explosive, likely bonding-curve-driven price move (~20,426% reported 24h change) followed by sharp intraday pullbacks (-24% 1h, -31% 5m). With only $78.58K in liquidity, unknown mint/freeze authority status, no sniper coverage, and a bare-bones 'Test Token' description with no social presence, this fits the profile of a highly speculative, high-risk new listing rather than an established project with verifiable fundamentals.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If genuine organic demand continues (1,669 unique 24h buyers observed) and liquidity deepens over time, the token could stabilize at a higher valuation than its bonding-curve origin, with FDV of $292.49K still leaving room for growth if attention increases.

  • Sustained retail buyer interest (buyer count exceeds seller count 1,669 vs 1,299)
  • Potential graduation from bonding curve to a deeper liquidity venue if volume persists
  • Narrative/momentum-driven speculative rallies common in newly launched Solana tokens

Base Case

Continued high volatility with no clear directional resolution in the near term; price likely to keep swinging sharply in both directions as the token trades on thin liquidity, with elevated probability of further downside given the recent pullback from intraday highs.

  • Liquidity remains shallow unless new capital enters the pool
  • No independent verification of contract safety (authorities) occurs before further trading decisions
  • Trading activity remains dominated by short-term speculators rather than long-term holders

Bear Case

High probability

The token mirrors a classic pump-and-dump pattern: an extreme initial spike (from ~$0.0000015 to a high of ~$0.000628 within hours) followed by rapid retracement, thin liquidity making exits costly, and unknown authority settings that could allow supply dilution or account freezes.

  • Shallow $78.58K liquidity relative to volume enabling severe price swings and slippage
  • Recent sharp reversals (-24.3% 1h, -30.8% 5m) suggesting momentum has already turned negative
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority and lack of contract verification increase rug-pull potential
  • No social links or project transparency; described only as a 'Test Token'

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 24, 09:46 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-24 21:45 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (mint, decimals, supply, FDV)
  • Price feed (USD price and % change intervals)
  • Hourly OHLCV candle data (18 most recent hours)
  • Trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot only)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • No sniper data was available, so sniper concentration, PnL state, and dump risk are unknown rather than computed
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) exists — only a single current snapshot of 569 holders and 16.37% top-10 concentration
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, and contract verification status are all unknown; rug risk from authorities cannot be assessed
  • Top-100 holder concentration and wallet classifications (team, whale, bot, exchange) are unavailable
  • Extremely limited trading history (~18 hours of candles) prevents robust medium/long-term technical analysis
  • Token has no social links and is described only as 'Test Token', limiting fundamental/narrative analysis

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided, which contains significant gaps (authority status, sniper coverage, holder history). Token markets, especially newly launched low-liquidity tokens, carry very high risk including total loss of capital. Conduct independent due diligence before making any investment decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is OG ownership?

As of 2026-09-24 21:45 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 16.37% of supply. It reports 569 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling OG?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-24 21:45 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $310,849.00 in buys and $319,410.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is OG liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +7089.45%, from $1,548.32 (2026-09-24 04:00 UTC) to $111,315.51 (2026-09-24 21:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for OG (OG)?

Momentum has turned sharply negative in the most recent candles: price fell from a high of $0.000628 (hour 17) to $0.000306 by hour 18, and the -24.3% (1h) and -30.8% (5m) readings suggest the pullback is accelerating. Absent fresh buy volume, continued downside toward recent intraday support levels is likely, though shallow liquidity means sharp bounces are also possible. Short-term outlook is bearish (next 1-6 hours), with a target range of $0.000195 to $0.000490.

Is OG a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand the possibility of total capital loss. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking predictable returns, or anyone unable to independently verify authority settings and contract safety before trading. Position sizing should be minimal given the very_high risk classification.

What are the key risks of holding OG?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($78.58K) relative to 24h volume (~$630K combined), creating high slippage and thin exit liquidity • Mint/freeze authority status unknown — possibility that supply can be inflated or accounts frozen cannot be ruled out • No sniper coverage data available, so early-buyer dump risk cannot be quantified

← Back to all predictions

Track OG