GYM

Gym Showdown Price Today & AI Analysis

GYM
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 3, 2026

EeSHyt1ahSvm91CSa8ASqvenmxxQn2WU5VeNhdmepump

$0.000366

+22.94%

FDV $354,100

LiveContract:EeSHyt1ahSvm91CSa8ASqvenmxxQn2WU5VeNhdmepumpChain:SolanaHolders:1,719Market cap:$354,100

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about GYM

Report snapshotas of Jun 3, 07:20 PM
FDV

$505,076

Liquidity

$22,755

Holders

436

Snipers

33

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Gym Showdown (GYM) is a very early-stage Solana token launched on PumpSwap, themed around a Pokémon-card battle gym with on-chain mechanics including PSA slab trading, SOL settlement, vault yield, and a token buy-and-burn model. The token is extremely new — it had only 4 holders for the entire month of May 2026 before exploding to 436 holders within the last 48 hours. Price has surged +207% in 24 hours from ~$0.000165 to ~$0.000505, but sell pressure is dominant at 70.1% of 24h volume. Total liquidity is a thin $22.75K, making this a very high-risk, speculative micro-cap.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Novel Pokémon-card battle gym concept with on-chain PSA slab settlement on Solana
Active buy-and-burn tokenomics mechanism described in project metadata
Explosive holder growth from 4 to 436 in under 48 hours (+99% in 7d)
207%+ price surge in 24 hours with high momentum but thin $22.75K liquidity
PumpSwap-launched token with unverified contract and unknown update authority

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

After a parabolic 207% 24h surge, GYM is showing early signs of exhaustion. The most recent candle (19:00 UTC) closed lower than its open at $0.000497, down from the 18:00 UTC high of $0.000606. Sell pressure dominates at 70.1% of volume (999 sells vs 402 buys). The 5-minute price change is already -11.06%, suggesting a near-term pullback is underway. Support is thin given only $22.75K in liquidity.

Target low$0.000280
Target high$0.000606
Support: $0.000497 (recent close / candle [1] low), $0.000315 (candle [3] open / candle [2] low area), $0.000248 (candle [4] close)
Resistance: $0.000536 (candle [2] close), $0.000606 (24h high, candle [2] high), $0.000526 (candle [1] open)

Medium term

neutral
3–14 days

Medium-term direction depends entirely on whether the project delivers on its stated utility (on-chain card battles, PSA slab settlement, vault yield). With only 436 holders and $22.75K liquidity, the token is highly susceptible to whale exits. If the team executes and community grows, consolidation above $0.000300 is possible. Failure to retain holders post-pump would likely see price retrace toward pre-pump levels (~$0.000090–$0.000115).

Catalysts
  • Project delivering working on-chain card battle mechanics
  • Liquidity deepening via additional LP deposits
  • Broader Solana memecoin/gaming narrative tailwinds
  • Buy-and-burn events reducing circulating supply

Bullish factors

  • 207% 24h price surge with strong momentum candles (candles [4]–[2] show consistent higher highs)
  • Holder count growing rapidly: +129 in 24h, +432 in 7d (99% growth)
  • Unique concept (on-chain Pokémon card gym) with described utility mechanics
  • Buy-and-burn mechanism could reduce supply pressure over time
  • 1h price change still +58.5% indicating momentum not fully exhausted

Bearish factors

  • Sell pressure dominates: 70.1% sell volume ($120.23K sells vs $51.17K buys) in 24h
  • 999 sells vs 402 buys — sellers outnumber buyers 2.5:1
  • Extremely thin liquidity at $22.75K — large slippage risk on any meaningful exit
  • Unverified contract and unknown update authority introduce rug risk
  • Token was dormant with only 4 holders for ~28 days before sudden activation
  • Top 100 holders control 87.22% of supply — extreme concentration
  • 5-minute price already down -11.06% from recent peak
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the token's extremely short trading history (effectively 2 days of real activity), unverified contract, unknown update authority, very thin liquidity ($22.75K), and the absence of sniper cost-basis data which limits smart money analysis. The 207% pump in 24h introduces high mean-reversion risk.

Deep Analysis

The 24-hour OHLC series reveals a powerful parabolic move. From candle [24] (20:00 UTC Jun 2) at an open of ~$0.000136, price consolidated in a narrow range (~$0.000090–$0.000115) through candles [20]–[15] (00:00–05:00 UTC Jun 3), then began a sustained breakout. Candles [6]–[2] (14:00–18:00 UTC) show a series of higher highs and higher lows — a textbook uptrend sequence. Candle [2] (18:00 UTC) is the most significant: a wide-range bullish candle with open $0.000316, high $0.000606, close $0.000536, on the highest volume of the series ($37,974). Candle [1] (19:00 UTC) is a bearish candle closing at $0.000497 below its open of $0.000526, suggesting the initial impulse is losing steam. Earlier, candle [21] (23:00 UTC Jun 2) shows a long upper wick from $0.000196 high down to $0.000117 close — a shooting star / bearish reversal signal that preceded a brief consolidation before the main pump.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
uptrend

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 30%Sell 70%

Short and medium-term trend is technically uptrend given the 207% 24h gain and series of higher highs from candle [13] onward. However, the most recent candle is bearish and volume is declining from the 18:00 UTC peak, suggesting the uptrend may be transitioning to a pullback phase.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000497 (candle [1] close / low)
Major$0.000248–$0.000315 (candles [4]–[3] range, prior breakout zone)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000526–$0.000536 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close)
Major$0.000606 (24h absolute high, candle [2] high)

The $0.000497 level is the first line of defense as it represents the most recent candle's close. A break below this opens a path to the $0.000315–$0.000248 zone which was the breakout area during the 16:00–17:00 UTC candles. The $0.000606 high is the key resistance — a clean break above would signal continuation of the pump. The $0.000087–$0.000094 zone (candles [15]–[16]) represents the pre-pump base and would be the worst-case support.

Notable patterns

  • Parabolic price advance: ~460% move from 24h low to 24h high in ~13 hours
  • Series of higher highs and higher lows from candle [13] to candle [2] — confirmed uptrend structure
  • Shooting star / long upper wick on candle [21] (23:00 UTC Jun 2) — early bearish signal before consolidation
  • Wide-range bullish engulfing candle [2] (18:00 UTC) on highest volume — climax candle
  • Bearish reversal candle [1] (19:00 UTC) closing below open after the climax — potential exhaustion signal
  • Volume declining on candle [1] vs candle [2] — bearish divergence at potential top

Total holders436
24h Δ+30
7d Δ+99
30d Δ+99
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Holder growth is strongly correlated with the price pump. The token had exactly 4 holders from May 4 through May 31 (28 days of dormancy), then exploded to 175 on June 1 (+171 holders, +98%), 316 on June 2 (+141, +45%), and 436 as of June 3 (+129 in 24h, +30%). The price surge from ~$0.000090 to $0.000505 coincides precisely with this holder explosion, suggesting the pump attracted new buyers rather than organic community growth preceding the price move.

Holder growth is accelerating in absolute terms but the rate of daily growth is actually decelerating: +171 on June 1, +141 on June 2, +129 in the most recent 24h. This deceleration in new holder acquisition, combined with the price showing early exhaustion signals, is a cautionary indicator. The 7d and 30d growth figures are both 99% because the token was effectively inactive (4 holders) for the entire prior month. The distribution shows 141 whales, 42 sharks, 116 dolphins, 74 fish, and 34 octopus — a surprisingly whale-heavy distribution for only 436 total holders, indicating large-position holders dominate the cap table.

Top 10 hold31.07%
Top 100 hold87.22%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

CSPp3UTUVabFuoXZko66eJxmV2HgFuoe8hDFcPA8spRx

DEX liquidity pool (PumpSwap pair address matches the trading pair CSPp3UTUVabFuoXZko66eJxmV2HgFuoe8hDFcPA8spRx)

5.09%

B41iRhMyHBsU5rXvujQsig8c7Ety8k75BLNtSKKQDywj

Individual whale / early accumulator

4.90%

Fwbt5aauYjn4F9NCPag1VUXYEoiL5wheHYGFrXfXziqs

Individual whale / early accumulator

3.21%

6XwWfSrvbp6GybrAV6iBbCpAbHZM1Bd9uvNWz8uhJJEo

Individual whale (round balance of 29,000,000.9 suggests possible team/insider allocation)

2.90%

3gtqUj8rngmy1WFHDJBHDdgQJqA3wyoiUzTeBX49ZxhQ

Individual whale / early accumulator

2.79%

The top 10 holders control 31.07% of supply and the top 100 control 87.22% — an extremely concentrated distribution typical of very new PumpSwap launches. The #1 holder (5.09%) is the PumpSwap liquidity pool itself, which is expected. Holders #2 through #10 are individual wallets each holding 2.3%–4.9%, none showing obvious CEX or burn address characteristics. Holder #4 (6XwWfSrvbp6GybrAV6iBbCpAbHZM1Bd9uvNWz8uhJJEo) holds a suspiciously round 29,000,000.9 tokens (2.90%), which may indicate a team or insider allocation. The remaining top holders appear to be early swap buyers. With 141 classified 'whales' out of 436 total holders (32%), the token is dominated by large-position holders who could significantly impact price if they decide to exit simultaneously. Sentiment is mixed — the price pump suggests some accumulation, but the 70.1% sell pressure indicates distribution is already underway.

Liquidity$22,750
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$51,170
Sell$120,230
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers146
Unique sellers455

Liquidity is critically thin at $22,750 total — this means a single $5,000 sell order could move the price by 20%+ and a $22,750 sell would theoretically drain the entire pool. The 24h trading volume of ~$171,400 ($51.17K buys + $120.23K sells) is 7.5x the total liquidity, confirming extreme slippage risk. Net flow is strongly negative (outflow): sell volume is 2.35x buy volume, with 455 unique sellers vs only 146 unique buyers. The ratio of sells to buys (999 vs 402 transactions) further confirms distribution pressure. Despite the price pump, the market microstructure is bearish — more participants are exiting than entering. The FDV of $89.64K (per trading analytics) vs the metadata FDV of $505,075 discrepancy may reflect different supply calculations or price snapshots and should be noted as a data inconsistency.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,999,130.04
FDV$505,075.59

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is ~1 billion tokens (999,999,130), a standard PumpFun/PumpSwap launch supply. The FDV at current price is ~$505K per metadata (note: trading analytics shows $89.64K FDV, likely using a different price snapshot). Update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and the contract is unverified — this means mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the provided data. The token is marked as 'mutable: false' which is a positive signal suggesting metadata cannot be changed, but this does not confirm authority renouncement. The 'possible spam: false' flag is reassuring. The described tokenomics (buy-and-burn mechanism) could be deflationary if implemented, but no on-chain evidence of burns is visible in the current data. Investors should independently verify authority status on-chain before committing capital.

Volatility
high

Price has moved +207% in 24 hours and -11% in the last 5 minutes. The token went from $0.000087 to $0.000606 and back to $0.000497 within a single day. Extreme volatility is inherent to this stage of the token lifecycle.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity is only $22,750. The 24h volume of ~$171K is 7.5x the liquidity pool, meaning large trades face severe slippage. Any significant holder exit could crash the price.

Concentration
high

Top 10 holders control 31.07% of supply; top 100 control 87.22%. With 141 'whale' classified holders out of 436 total, coordinated or panic selling by a small number of wallets could be devastating. Holder #4 holds a suspiciously round 29M tokens.

SniperDump
medium

20 snipers identified in the first 1,000 blocks. Most who have exited did so profitably (14/20 positive PnL). Several large snipers (AgmLJBMDCqWynYnQiPCuj9ewsNNsBJXyzoUhD9LJzN51 at +116.3%, E45YLW6LV2GdvPu4HgpBMZF4veGmUqbK6hs2W3ykx2s1 at +46.3%) have already sold. Unknown balances for most snipers means residual dump risk cannot be fully quantified.

Authority
medium

Update authority is 'unknown' and the contract is unverified. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. The 'mutable: false' flag is positive but insufficient to fully clear authority risk. Investors cannot confirm whether new tokens could be minted or accounts frozen.

Key risks

  • Critically thin liquidity ($22.75K) — any large sell order will cause severe price impact
  • Unverified contract with unknown update/mint/freeze authority — potential rug vector
  • Extreme supply concentration: top 100 hold 87.22% of supply
  • Token was dormant for 28+ days with only 4 holders — suspicious pre-launch behavior
  • 70.1% sell pressure in 24h with 455 sellers vs 146 buyers — active distribution
  • No on-chain proof of stated utility (card battles, PSA slabs, vault yield) yet
  • Holder growth rate decelerating (171 → 141 → 129 per day) while price shows exhaustion

Mitigating factors

  • Described utility concept (on-chain card gym) is novel and could attract a niche community
  • Buy-and-burn mechanism if implemented could reduce supply over time
  • Token marked 'mutable: false' — metadata cannot be altered
  • 'Possible spam: false' flag from data provider
  • Price has held above pre-pump levels ($0.000090) so far
  • Rapid holder growth (+432 in 7 days) shows genuine market interest
Suitable for: Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced DeFi traders who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. This is a speculative micro-cap with unverified utility, thin liquidity, and extreme concentration. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those investing more than a very small percentage of their portfolio, or anyone without experience navigating PumpSwap-launched tokens.

GYM is a high-concept, ultra-early-stage Solana token that has just emerged from a 28-day dormancy period with a viral 207% price pump. The investment thesis hinges entirely on whether the team can deliver the described on-chain Pokémon card battle mechanics and grow a sustainable community. At current prices, the risk/reward is skewed negatively in the short term given dominant sell pressure, thin liquidity, and post-pump exhaustion signals. Longer-term, the concept has niche appeal if executed.

Bull case (low)

The development team delivers a working on-chain card battle prototype within 2–4 weeks, attracting the Pokémon/TCG community to Solana. Liquidity deepens to $100K+, holder count grows to 2,000+, and the buy-and-burn mechanism creates visible deflationary pressure. Price consolidates above $0.000400 and eventually tests new highs above $0.000606.

  • Successful delivery of on-chain card battle mechanics and PSA slab integration
  • Viral social media traction in TCG/Pokémon communities
  • Liquidity deepening and reduced concentration risk
  • Broader Solana gaming/NFT narrative tailwinds
  • Consistent buy-and-burn events reducing circulating supply

Base case

GYM consolidates in the $0.000250–$0.000400 range over the next 1–2 weeks as early buyers take profits and a smaller but more committed holder base forms. The team makes social media updates about development progress, maintaining enough interest to prevent a full collapse. Liquidity remains thin but stable. Price eventually moves based on whether a working product is demonstrated.

  • Some profit-taking by early buyers reduces price from current levels
  • Team remains active and communicates development progress
  • Liquidity pool is not fully drained by large exits
  • A core community of 200–400 holders remains engaged
  • No rug or authority exploit occurs

Bear case (high)

The post-pump sell pressure continues, liquidity is drained, and the token retraces to pre-pump levels (~$0.000090–$0.000115). The team fails to deliver utility, holders who bought during the pump exit at a loss, and the token returns to near-dormancy. Given the 28-day dormancy period before the pump, this pattern is a known risk.

  • Dominant sell pressure (70.1%) continues post-pump
  • Thin $22.75K liquidity cannot absorb whale exits
  • No verifiable on-chain utility delivered
  • Unknown authority status creates trust deficit
  • Holder growth deceleration signals fading momentum

GeneratedJun 3, 07:20 PM
Data freshnessPrice and OHLC data current as of approximately 19:00 UTC June 3, 2026. Holder data reflects state at time of data pull. Sniper data covers first 1,000 blocks post-launch.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (Mint: EeSHyt1ahSvm91CSa8ASqvenmxxQn2WU5VeNhdmepump)
  • PumpSwap pair data (CSPp3UTUVabFuoXZko66eJxmV2HgFuoe8hDFcPA8spRx)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (24 candles, Jun 2–3 2026)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data
  • Historical holder series (30 days daily)
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks, 20 snipers)
  • Top 20 holder wallet data

Limitations

  • Sniper cost-basis (sniped USD amounts) is unknown for all 20 snipers, limiting smart money analysis precision
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are unknown — rug risk cannot be fully assessed
  • Token has only ~48 hours of real trading history, making technical analysis less reliable
  • FDV discrepancy between metadata ($505K) and trading analytics ($89.64K) could not be fully reconciled
  • Holder wallet classifications are inferred from on-chain patterns, not verified identities
  • No on-chain proof of stated utility (card battles, vault yield, PSA slabs) was available in the data
  • Current balance data for most snipers is unknown, preventing full sniper exit analysis

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap tokens on PumpSwap, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,999,130.04

Key Risks

Critically thin liquidity ($22.75K) — any large sell order will cause severe price impact
Unverified contract with unknown update/mint/freeze authority — potential rug vector
Extreme supply concentration: top 100 hold 87.22% of supply
Token was dormant for 28+ days with only 4 holders — suspicious pre-launch behavior

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

20 snipers were identified in the first 1,000 blocks. Sniped USD amounts are unknown for all, limiting precise concentration calculation. Of the 20 snipers with known PnL data, 14 show positive realized PnL percentages and 4 show negative, indicating the majority of early buyers who have exited did so profitably. The largest sniper (AgmLJBMDCqWynYnQiPCuj9ewsNNsBJXyzoUhD9LJzN51) realized +116.3% on $6,160 in sales. Other notable profitable exits include E45YLW6LV2GdvPu4HgpBMZF4veGmUqbK6hs2W3ykx2s1 (+46.3%, $3,960), kEFiAX3jo5NmemysQov342TZ9mGh6yp92GDRjhA8XDf (+45.3%, $3,932), and 5ULokyiYjjFYRrQZX4a2fBp7ixk5ijFVd5rP76cUL6C (+49.4%, $2,670). Several snipers show $0 current balance, implying full exits. The fact that most snipers are already out or in profit raises profit-taking risk for remaining holders.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration2.00%
PnL stateMostly In Profit
Sell-through rateModerate
Profit-taking risk
high

Sniper cost-basis data (sniped USD amounts) is unknown for all 20 snipers; current balances are largely $0 or unknown, suggesting most snipers have exited or nearly exited their positions. The largest realized PnL sniper (AgmLJBMDCqWynYnQiPCuj9ewsNNsBJXyzoUhD9LJzN51) sold $6,160 at +116.3% profit.

Mixed-to-bearish: most early snipers who have exited did so profitably, suggesting they viewed this as a short-term trade rather than a long-term hold. The 4 snipers with negative PnL (losses of -8% to -48.8%) likely sold into weakness. Remaining sniper positions are unclear due to unknown balance data.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Gym Showdown (GYM)?

After a parabolic 207% 24h surge, GYM is showing early signs of exhaustion. The most recent candle (19:00 UTC) closed lower than its open at $0.000497, down from the 18:00 UTC high of $0.000606. Sell pressure dominates at 70.1% of volume (999 sells vs 402 buys). The 5-minute price change is already -11.06%, suggesting a near-term pullback is underway. Support is thin given only $22.75K in liquidity. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000280 to $0.000606.

Is GYM a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced DeFi traders who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. This is a speculative micro-cap with unverified utility, thin liquidity, and extreme concentration. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those investing more than a very small percentage of their portfolio, or anyone without experience navigating PumpSwap-launched tokens.

How are GYM holders trending?

Gym Showdown currently has 436 holders and is growing (24h: 30, 7d: 99, 30d: 99). Holder growth is accelerating in absolute terms but the rate of daily growth is actually decelerating: +171 on June 1, +141 on June 2, +129 in the most recent 24h. This deceleration in new holder acquisition, combined with the price showing early exhaustion signals, is a cautionary indicator. The 7d and 30d growth figures are both 99% because the token was effectively inactive (4 holders) for the entire prior month. The distribution shows 141 whales, 42 sharks, 116 dolphins, 74 fish, and 34 octopus — a surprisingly whale-heavy distribution for only 436 total holders, indicating large-position holders dominate the cap table.

What does sniper activity look like for GYM?

Snipers hold roughly 2.00% of supply with PnL state "mostly_in_profit" and sell-through rate "moderate". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding GYM?

Critically thin liquidity ($22.75K) — any large sell order will cause severe price impact • Unverified contract with unknown update/mint/freeze authority — potential rug vector • Extreme supply concentration: top 100 hold 87.22% of supply

Track GYM