Gym Showdown Price Today & AI Analysis

GYMSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 3, 2026

$0.000181

+34.72% 24h

Contract

Live

EeSHyt1ahSvm91CSa8ASqvenmxxQn2WU5VeNhdmepump

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,636

Market cap

$175,327

At a $1M market cap, $GYM would be $0.001035 (5.70x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Ask Unhosted AI about GYM

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

CadenceCadence$0.0₄7755-17.8%MC $74.9K

FLAMEFlame$0.000126+0.2%MC $125.6K

TTPTrendTrader Pro$0.000178+35.7%MC $173.9K

PAWSPaws$0.0₄1939+35.4%MC $19.2K

CLOUDCloud$0.0621-0.9%MC $46.01M

KMNOKamino$0.0409+4.5%MC $236.18M

Gym Showdown: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-03 19:20 UTC

Holder addresses

436

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$22,754.77

How concentrated is Gym Showdown ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 436 addresses (2026-06-03 19:20 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Gym Showdown?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Gym Showdown liquidity falling?: As of 2026-06-03 19:20 UTC, reported liquidity was $22,754.77. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-03 19:20 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jun 3, 07:20 PM UTC

FDV

$505,076

Liquidity

$22,754.77

Holders

436

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Gym Showdown (GYM) is a very early-stage Solana token launched on PumpSwap, themed around a Pokémon-card battle gym with on-chain mechanics including PSA slab trading, SOL settlement, vault yield, and a token buy-and-burn model. The token is extremely new — it had only 4 holders for the entire month of May 2026 before exploding to 436 holders within the last 48 hours. Price has surged +207% in 24 hours from ~$0.000165 to ~$0.000505, but sell pressure is dominant at 70.1% of 24h volume. Total liquidity is a thin $22.75K, making this a very high-risk, speculative micro-cap.

Key points

Novel Pokémon-card battle gym concept with on-chain PSA slab settlement on Solana
Active buy-and-burn tokenomics mechanism described in project metadata
Explosive holder growth from 4 to 436 in under 48 hours (+99% in 7d)
207%+ price surge in 24 hours with high momentum but thin $22.75K liquidity
PumpSwap-launched token with unverified contract and unknown update authority

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

After a parabolic 207% 24h surge, GYM is showing early signs of exhaustion. The most recent candle (19:00 UTC) closed lower than its open at $0.000497, down from the 18:00 UTC high of $0.000606. Sell pressure dominates at 70.1% of volume (999 sells vs 402 buys). The 5-minute price change is already -11.06%, suggesting a near-term pullback is underway. Support is thin given only $22.75K in liquidity.

Target low

$0.000280

Target high

$0.000606

Support: $0.000497 (recent close / candle [1] low), $0.000315 (candle [3] open / candle [2] low area), $0.000248 (candle [4] close)
Resistance: $0.000536 (candle [2] close), $0.000606 (24h high, candle [2] high), $0.000526 (candle [1] open)

Medium term · 3–14 days

neutral

Medium-term direction depends entirely on whether the project delivers on its stated utility (on-chain card battles, PSA slab settlement, vault yield). With only 436 holders and $22.75K liquidity, the token is highly susceptible to whale exits. If the team executes and community grows, consolidation above $0.000300 is possible. Failure to retain holders post-pump would likely see price retrace toward pre-pump levels (~$0.000090–$0.000115).

Catalysts

Project delivering working on-chain card battle mechanics
Liquidity deepening via additional LP deposits
Broader Solana memecoin/gaming narrative tailwinds
Buy-and-burn events reducing circulating supply

Bullish factors

207% 24h price surge with strong momentum candles (candles [4]–[2] show consistent higher highs)
Holder count growing rapidly: +129 in 24h, +432 in 7d (99% growth)
Unique concept (on-chain Pokémon card gym) with described utility mechanics
Buy-and-burn mechanism could reduce supply pressure over time
1h price change still +58.5% indicating momentum not fully exhausted

Bearish factors

Sell pressure dominates: 70.1% sell volume ($120.23K sells vs $51.17K buys) in 24h
999 sells vs 402 buys — sellers outnumber buyers 2.5:1
Extremely thin liquidity at $22.75K — large slippage risk on any meaningful exit
Unverified contract and unknown update authority introduce rug risk
Token was dormant with only 4 holders for ~28 days before sudden activation
Top 100 holders control 87.22% of supply — extreme concentration
5-minute price already down -11.06% from recent peak

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the token's extremely short trading history (effectively 2 days of real activity), unverified contract, unknown update authority, very thin liquidity ($22.75K), and the absence of sniper cost-basis data which limits smart money analysis. The 207% pump in 24h introduces high mean-reversion risk.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: EeSHyt...pump
Total Supply: 999,999,130.04

Key Risks

Critically thin liquidity ($22.75K) — any large sell order will cause severe price impact
Unverified contract with unknown update/mint/freeze authority — potential rug vector
Extreme supply concentration: top 100 hold 87.22% of supply
Token was dormant for 28+ days with only 4 holders — suspicious pre-launch behavior

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 24-hour OHLC series reveals a powerful parabolic move. From candle [24] (20:00 UTC Jun 2) at an open of ~$0.000136, price consolidated in a narrow range (~$0.000090–$0.000115) through candles [20]–[15] (00:00–05:00 UTC Jun 3), then began a sustained breakout. Candles [6]–[2] (14:00–18:00 UTC) show a series of higher highs and higher lows — a textbook uptrend sequence. Candle [2] (18:00 UTC) is the most significant: a wide-range bullish candle with open $0.000316, high $0.000606, close $0.000536, on the highest volume of the series ($37,974). Candle [1] (19:00 UTC) is a bearish candle closing at $0.000497 below its open of $0.000526, suggesting the initial impulse is losing steam. Earlier, candle [21] (23:00 UTC Jun 2) shows a long upper wick from $0.000196 high down to $0.000117 close — a shooting star / bearish reversal signal that preceded a brief consolidation before the main pump.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Short and medium-term trend is technically uptrend given the 207% 24h gain and series of higher highs from candle [13] onward. However, the most recent candle is bearish and volume is declining from the 18:00 UTC peak, suggesting the uptrend may be transitioning to a pullback phase.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

30%

Sell

70%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000497 (candle [1] close / low)

Major support

$0.000248–$0.000315 (candles [4]–[3] range, prior breakout zone)

Immediate resistance

$0.000526–$0.000536 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close)

Major resistance

$0.000606 (24h absolute high, candle [2] high)

The $0.000497 level is the first line of defense as it represents the most recent candle's close. A break below this opens a path to the $0.000315–$0.000248 zone which was the breakout area during the 16:00–17:00 UTC candles. The $0.000606 high is the key resistance — a clean break above would signal continuation of the pump. The $0.000087–$0.000094 zone (candles [15]–[16]) represents the pre-pump base and would be the worst-case support.

Notable patterns

Parabolic price advance: ~460% move from 24h low to 24h high in ~13 hours
Series of higher highs and higher lows from candle [13] to candle [2] — confirmed uptrend structure
Shooting star / long upper wick on candle [21] (23:00 UTC Jun 2) — early bearish signal before consolidation
Wide-range bullish engulfing candle [2] (18:00 UTC) on highest volume — climax candle
Bearish reversal candle [1] (19:00 UTC) closing below open after the climax — potential exhaustion signal
Volume declining on candle [1] vs candle [2] — bearish divergence at potential top

Liquidity

$22,754.77

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically thin at $22,750 total — this means a single $5,000 sell order could move the price by 20%+ and a $22,750 sell would theoretically drain the entire pool. The 24h trading volume of ~$171,400 ($51.17K buys + $120.23K sells) is 7.5x the total liquidity, confirming extreme slippage risk. Net flow is strongly negative (outflow): sell volume is 2.35x buy volume, with 455 unique sellers vs only 146 unique buyers. The ratio of sells to buys (999 vs 402 transactions) further confirms distribution pressure. Despite the price pump, the market microstructure is bearish — more participants are exiting than entering. The FDV of $89.64K (per trading analytics) vs the metadata FDV of $505,075 discrepancy may reflect different supply calculations or price snapshots and should be noted as a data inconsistency.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,999,130.04

FDV

$505,075.59

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price has moved +207% in 24 hours and -11% in the last 5 minutes. The token went from $0.000087 to $0.000606 and back to $0.000497 within a single day. Extreme volatility is inherent to this stage of the token lifecycle.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $22,750. The 24h volume of ~$171K is 7.5x the liquidity pool, meaning large trades face severe slippage. Any significant holder exit could crash the price.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Critically thin liquidity ($22.75K) — any large sell order will cause severe price impact
Unverified contract with unknown update/mint/freeze authority — potential rug vector
Extreme supply concentration: top 100 hold 87.22% of supply
Token was dormant for 28+ days with only 4 holders — suspicious pre-launch behavior
70.1% sell pressure in 24h with 455 sellers vs 146 buyers — active distribution
No on-chain proof of stated utility (card battles, PSA slabs, vault yield) yet
Holder growth rate decelerating (171 → 141 → 129 per day) while price shows exhaustion

Mitigating factors

Described utility concept (on-chain card gym) is novel and could attract a niche community
Buy-and-burn mechanism if implemented could reduce supply over time
Token marked 'mutable: false' — metadata cannot be altered
'Possible spam: false' flag from data provider
Price has held above pre-pump levels ($0.000090) so far
Rapid holder growth (+432 in 7 days) shows genuine market interest

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced DeFi traders who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. This is a speculative micro-cap with unverified utility, thin liquidity, and extreme concentration. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those investing more than a very small percentage of their portfolio, or anyone without experience navigating PumpSwap-launched tokens.

GYM is a high-concept, ultra-early-stage Solana token that has just emerged from a 28-day dormancy period with a viral 207% price pump. The investment thesis hinges entirely on whether the team can deliver the described on-chain Pokémon card battle mechanics and grow a sustainable community. At current prices, the risk/reward is skewed negatively in the short term given dominant sell pressure, thin liquidity, and post-pump exhaustion signals. Longer-term, the concept has niche appeal if executed.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The development team delivers a working on-chain card battle prototype within 2–4 weeks, attracting the Pokémon/TCG community to Solana. Liquidity deepens to $100K+, holder count grows to 2,000+, and the buy-and-burn mechanism creates visible deflationary pressure. Price consolidates above $0.000400 and eventually tests new highs above $0.000606.

Successful delivery of on-chain card battle mechanics and PSA slab integration
Viral social media traction in TCG/Pokémon communities
Liquidity deepening and reduced concentration risk
Broader Solana gaming/NFT narrative tailwinds
Consistent buy-and-burn events reducing circulating supply

Base Case

GYM consolidates in the $0.000250–$0.000400 range over the next 1–2 weeks as early buyers take profits and a smaller but more committed holder base forms. The team makes social media updates about development progress, maintaining enough interest to prevent a full collapse. Liquidity remains thin but stable. Price eventually moves based on whether a working product is demonstrated.

Some profit-taking by early buyers reduces price from current levels
Team remains active and communicates development progress
Liquidity pool is not fully drained by large exits
A core community of 200–400 holders remains engaged
No rug or authority exploit occurs

Bear Case

High probability

The post-pump sell pressure continues, liquidity is drained, and the token retraces to pre-pump levels (~$0.000090–$0.000115). The team fails to deliver utility, holders who bought during the pump exit at a loss, and the token returns to near-dormancy. Given the 28-day dormancy period before the pump, this pattern is a known risk.

Dominant sell pressure (70.1%) continues post-pump
Thin $22.75K liquidity cannot absorb whale exits
No verifiable on-chain utility delivered
Unknown authority status creates trust deficit
Holder growth deceleration signals fading momentum

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 3, 07:20 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-03 19:20 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (Mint: EeSHyt1ahSvm91CSa8ASqvenmxxQn2WU5VeNhdmepump)
PumpSwap pair data (CSPp3UTUVabFuoXZko66eJxmV2HgFuoe8hDFcPA8spRx)
Hourly OHLC candle data (24 candles, Jun 2–3 2026)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
Holder metrics and distribution data
Historical holder series (30 days daily)
Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks, 20 snipers)
Top 20 holder wallet data

Limitations

Sniper cost-basis (sniped USD amounts) is unknown for all 20 snipers, limiting smart money analysis precision
Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are unknown — rug risk cannot be fully assessed
Token has only ~48 hours of real trading history, making technical analysis less reliable
FDV discrepancy between metadata ($505K) and trading analytics ($89.64K) could not be fully reconciled
Holder wallet classifications are inferred from on-chain patterns, not verified identities
No on-chain proof of stated utility (card battles, vault yield, PSA slabs) was available in the data
Current balance data for most snipers is unknown, preventing full sniper exit analysis

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap tokens on PumpSwap, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Gym Showdown ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 436 addresses (2026-06-03 19:20 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Gym Showdown?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Gym Showdown liquidity falling?

As of 2026-06-03 19:20 UTC, reported liquidity was $22,754.77. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Gym Showdown (GYM)?

Is GYM a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced DeFi traders who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. This is a speculative micro-cap with unverified utility, thin liquidity, and extreme concentration. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those investing more than a very small percentage of their portfolio, or anyone without experience navigating PumpSwap-launched tokens.

What are the key risks of holding GYM?

Critically thin liquidity ($22.75K) — any large sell order will cause severe price impact • Unverified contract with unknown update/mint/freeze authority — potential rug vector • Extreme supply concentration: top 100 hold 87.22% of supply