Flame Price Today & AI Analysis

FLAMESolanaAnalysis as of Sep 11, 2026

$0.000112

+9.60% 24h

Contract

Live

9oXA1VWKNiYDYa6VKHBFFBBvZdvuhw1b2eD5Aka7YrVt

Chain

Solana

Holders

2,277

Market cap

$112,282

At a $1M market cap, $FLAME would be $0.001000 (8.91x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is FLAME a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 24

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about FLAME

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

AABNBAirbnb - Backpack Securities$170.15-1.3%MC $57.6K

KimchiAura Final Boss$0.000127-16.1%MC $126.1K

INCOGINUINCOGINU$0.0₄8316-0.9%MC $83.1K MMGMMGM Resorts International - Backpack Securities$28.54+1.9%MC $81.3K

44coin$0.0₅7774-9.2%MC $7.5K

ZECZcash$1,286+3.4%MC $132.33M

Flame: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-11 17:46 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$99,128.00

How concentrated is Flame ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Flame?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Flame liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-11 17:46 UTC, reported liquidity was $99,128.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-11 17:46 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 11, 05:46 PM UTC

FDV

$1,803,869

Liquidity

$99,128.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

FLAME is a brand-new Solana token trading on Meteora DAMM that experienced an extreme parabolic move (+6,516% in 24h) within its first ~9 hours of recorded hourly candles, spiking from roughly $0.0000045 to an intraday high near $0.0045 before retracing to approximately $0.0018. With only $99.13K in total liquidity against a $1.80M fully diluted valuation, and no holder or sniper data available to verify distribution, this token exhibits the classic profile of a nascent, highly speculative micro-cap launch with substantial unknowns.

Key points

Went from sub-$0.00001 to over $0.0045 in a matter of hours, then partially retraced - a hallmark of a fresh, illiquid launch rather than an established asset
Nearly balanced 24h buy (50.3%) vs sell (49.7%) volume despite the huge price swing, suggesting two-sided speculative activity rather than a one-directional dump
Total liquidity of just ~$99K is a fraction of its $1.80M FDV, an unusually thin liquidity-to-valuation ratio
No holder, sniper, or authority-verification data available, leaving major transparency gaps

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

Momentum has turned negative in the immediate term (-9.6% over the last 1h, -3.1% over the last 5m) after the token has already retraced roughly 60% off its intraday high near $0.0045. With shallow liquidity of only ~$99K, price is likely to remain highly volatile and could either stabilize around recent support or continue bleeding toward lower support zones.

Target low

$0.0013

Target high

$0.0022

Support: $0.00160 (candle 5 low), $0.00141 (candle 8 low, lowest recent low)
Resistance: $0.00243 (candle 7/8 open-close zone), $0.00355 (candle 5 high)

Medium term · 3-7 days

neutral

Without holder distribution data, sniper analysis, or a longer price history, medium-term direction is highly uncertain. Tokens that spike this violently in their first hours often either find a new equilibrium with organic trading or collapse back toward their origination price as early buyers take profit.

Catalysts

Whether liquidity providers add depth to the $99K pool or withdraw it
Whether unique buyer counts (5,896 in 24h) continue growing or start declining, which would signal fading interest
Any future disclosure of authority renouncement or social/community presence that could add legitimacy
Broader Solana meme/micro-cap market sentiment

Bullish factors

Balanced 24h buy/sell volume (50.3%/49.7%) shows continued two-sided interest rather than pure capitulation
High unique buyer count (5,896) relative to sellers (4,319) in the last 24h
Live, active trading pair on a reputable DEX (Meteora DAMM)

Bearish factors

Price has already fallen ~60% from its intraday peak of ~$0.0045 to current ~$0.0018
Negative short-term momentum (-9.6% 1h, -3.1% 5m)
Extremely thin liquidity ($99.13K) makes the price prone to sharp moves in either direction on relatively small trades
Total absence of holder concentration and sniper data prevents confirmation that the rally wasn't driven by a small number of coordinated wallets

Confidence: low. Only 9 hours of candle data are available, no holder or sniper data exists, and authority status is unverified. This severely limits the reliability of any directional forecast beyond noting the extreme volatility already observed.

FLAME call history

Full track record →

Sep 11bearish@ $0.00180

24h+26.9%

7d-70.5%

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 9oXA1V...YrVt
Total Supply: 999,999,790.33 FLAME

Key Risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($99.13K) relative to FDV ($1.80M) creates high slippage and manipulation risk
No holder concentration data available - cannot verify whale distribution or rug potential
Authority status (mint/freeze/update) is unknown, leaving open the possibility of unrenounced control
24h price change of +6516% indicates a brand-new, highly speculative launch with no established price history beyond ~9 hours of candles

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Across the 9 available hourly candles, FLAME opened at approximately $0.0000045 and rocketed through candles 2-3 to an all-time-high (within this window) of $0.00454 in candle 3, before pulling back through candles 4-9 to close near $0.0018. This is a classic pump-and-partial-retrace pattern: a vertical initial markup followed by lower highs and lower lows as the move fades.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Zooming out, the medium-term trend (from candle 1 to now) is still overwhelmingly up, given the token started near $0.0000045 and now trades near $0.0018 - a multiple-hundred-x move. However, the short-term trend across the most recent candles (4 through 9) shows successive lower highs ($0.00357 -> $0.00355 -> $0.00319 -> $0.00292 -> $0.00243 -> $0.00220) and a declining close, indicating short-term downward momentum within the larger uptrend.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00165 (candle 8/9 low and open)

Major support

$0.00141 (candle 8 low, lowest print in the dataset after the initial ramp)

Immediate resistance

$0.00220 (candle 9 high)

Major resistance

$0.00454 (candle 3 high, the all-time high within this dataset)

Price is currently trading between its recent low of $0.00141 (candle 8) and the psychological/technical ceiling near $0.0022-0.0024 where several recent candle opens/closes have clustered. A reclaim above $0.0022 could target a retest of $0.0029-$0.0032, while a break below $0.00141 would signal the pullback is deepening.

Notable patterns

Vertical breakout / parabolic spike in candles 2-3 (classic new-listing pump)
Sequence of lower highs from candle 4 through candle 8 (fading momentum / distribution pattern)
Long lower wick in candle 2 (low of $0.0000044 vs open $0.0000137) indicating high intraday volatility and possible early sniper activity
Slight bullish reversal candle at candle 9 (close $0.0018 above open $0.00165) after a sharp decline, potentially a short-term stabilization signal

Liquidity

$99,128.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $99.13K is extremely thin relative to the $1.80M fully diluted valuation and the $3.26M+$3.23M=$6.49M in 24h trading volume that has flowed through the pool - implying the liquidity has effectively turned over more than 65x in a single day, a strong indicator of shallow-pool churn and high slippage risk for any meaningfully sized trade. Buy and sell volumes are nearly perfectly balanced (50.3% vs 49.7%), and unique buyers (5,896) modestly outnumber unique sellers (4,319), suggesting broad-based two-sided speculative trading rather than a coordinated dump, but the shallow liquidity means price can swing violently on relatively small net order flow imbalances.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,999,790.33 FLAME

FDV

$1.80M ($1,803,869)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Token surged 6516% in 24h with hourly candles showing swings from $0.0000045 to $0.0045 and back down to $0.0018 - extreme volatility typical of a freshly launched micro-cap.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $99.13K against a $1.80M FDV, meaning even modest trade sizes can move price significantly and large exits could crater the price.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($99.13K) relative to FDV ($1.80M) creates high slippage and manipulation risk
No holder concentration data available - cannot verify whale distribution or rug potential
Authority status (mint/freeze/update) is unknown, leaving open the possibility of unrenounced control
24h price change of +6516% indicates a brand-new, highly speculative launch with no established price history beyond ~9 hours of candles
Price already retraced hard from an intra-day high near $0.0045 to $0.0018 (roughly -60% from peak), and short-term momentum (-9.6% 1h, -3.1% 5m) is negative
No social links, description, or verification data provided - minimal transparency

Mitigating factors

24h buy/sell volume is roughly balanced (50.3% buy vs 49.7% sell) suggesting no overwhelming one-sided dumping at this moment
Trading activity is fairly active with 5,896 unique buyers vs 4,319 sellers in 24h, indicating broad participation rather than a single actor dominating
Pair is live on Meteora DAMM, a known Solana DEX infrastructure, rather than an obscure/unknown venue

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital. Not appropriate for risk-averse investors or those seeking capital preservation given the shallow liquidity, unknown authority status, missing holder data, and extreme volatility.

FLAME is an extremely young, extremely volatile Solana micro-cap that has already produced a multi-hundred-x intraday move followed by a ~60% retracement from its peak. The near-total absence of holder, sniper, and authority-verification data makes this a high-uncertainty, high-risk speculative bet suitable only for traders who can tolerate total capital loss and who are trading small, risk-defined position sizes.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buy-side momentum re-accelerates, unique buyer growth continues (5,896 in the last 24h alone), and the shallow liquidity pool attracts additional LPs, FLAME could stage a recovery rally back toward its recent highs near $0.0035-$0.0045, especially if it gains social/community traction that isn't currently visible in the data.

Sustained or growing unique buyer counts outweighing sellers
Additional liquidity being added to reduce slippage and support larger buy orders
Positive narrative/community formation around the token that isn't reflected in currently unknown social links

Base Case

Most likely, FLAME continues to trade in a highly volatile range between roughly $0.0014 and $0.0025 over the near term as the initial pump/dump cycle stabilizes into more typical (though still thin-liquidity) speculative trading, with balanced buy/sell volumes persisting until a clearer directional catalyst emerges.

24h buy/sell volume balance (50.3%/49.7%) persists in the near term
No major liquidity withdrawal or authority-based rug event occurs
Trading volume gradually normalizes down from the initial spike (candle 3's ~$5M) toward levels seen in the most recent candles (~$126K-$400K per hour)

Bear Case

Medium probability

Given the token's brand-new listing, unverified authorities, and razor-thin liquidity, FLAME could continue its post-peak decline, potentially breaking below the $0.00141 recent low as early buyers and any undetected snipers take profit, with the shallow pool amplifying downside moves and potentially leading toward the pool being drained or abandoned.

Unverified mint/freeze authority creating rug-pull potential
Extremely low liquidity relative to FDV enabling large price impact from modest sell orders
Already-observed steep pullback (~60% from intraday high) and negative short-term momentum (-9.6% 1h)
Lack of any social presence or description suggesting limited fundamental backing

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 11, 05:46 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-11 17:46 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain price feed (USD)
OHLC hourly candle data (9 most recent candles) from Meteora DAMM pair 23B6d3FvDu2eiZxyBLgWdm2W2vn1bdRwJTR6NCfQpxGE
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
Token metadata (mint address, supply, decimals, FDV)

Limitations

No holder distribution data available (holder endpoints retired) - holderTrends and whaleMap sections are populated with placeholder zero/empty values as required
No sniper/early-buyer wallet data available - smart money signals could not be quantified
Only 9 hourly candles available, providing a very short price history (~9 hours) insufficient for robust technical or trend analysis
Metadata fields for update/mint/freeze authority, contract verification, and mutability are all unknown, preventing rug-risk verification
24h % price change figure (6516.85%) appears to reflect the token's very recent listing/bonding rather than a mature trading history, limiting comparability to established tokens

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain data and is for informational purposes only. It is NOT financial advice. Cryptocurrency trading, especially in newly-listed, low-liquidity micro-cap tokens like FLAME, carries a very high risk of substantial or total loss of capital. Data gaps (holder distribution, sniper wallets, authority verification) mean this analysis cannot fully assess rug-pull or manipulation risk. Independent due diligence and on-chain verification are strongly recommended before making any investment decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Flame (FLAME) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 24, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Flame (FLAME)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 24, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Flame ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Flame?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Flame liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-11 17:46 UTC, reported liquidity was $99,128.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Flame (FLAME)?

Is FLAME a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital. Not appropriate for risk-averse investors or those seeking capital preservation given the shallow liquidity, unknown authority status, missing holder data, and extreme volatility.

What are the key risks of holding FLAME?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($99.13K) relative to FDV ($1.80M) creates high slippage and manipulation risk • No holder concentration data available - cannot verify whale distribution or rug potential • Authority status (mint/freeze/update) is unknown, leaving open the possibility of unrenounced control