E

iShares MSCI South Korea ETF - Backpack Securities Price Today & AI Analysis

EWYSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 26, 2026

Price

$194.97

-7.72% 24h

Contract

Live
EWY4owSJYMpwN33qGDu5gGxpkQkpMJu8ZUsQJaNZG5dv

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,182

Market cap

$526,407

More tokens on Solana

fonefoneapeonfone$0.006155+40.2%MC $6.09MBOTIFYBOTIFYBotify$0.001642+27.6%MC $1.64MSKHYSKHYSK Hynix - Backpack Securities$192.27+3.2%MC $2.16Mroonroonroon$0.000295+521.6%MC $290.2KFranklinFranklinFranklin The Turtle$0.000264+446.5%MC $250.9KTRUMPTRUMPOFFICIAL TRUMP$2.15+2.8%MC $2.15B

iShares MSCI South Korea ETF - Backpack Securities: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-26 16:15 UTC

Holder addresses

1,182

Top 10 supply share

36.19%

Reported liquidity

$183,115.00
How concentrated is iShares MSCI South Korea ETF - Backpack Securities ownership?
As of 2026-09-26 16:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 36.19% of supply. It reports 1,182 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling iShares MSCI South Korea ETF - Backpack Securities?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-26 16:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $356,583.00 in buys and $1,227,892.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is iShares MSCI South Korea ETF - Backpack Securities liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +219.66%, from $122,627.46 (2026-09-26 14:00 UTC) to $391,994.85 (2026-09-26 16:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-26 16:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-26 14:00 UTC$122,627.46
2026-09-26 15:00 UTC$404,098.90
2026-09-26 16:00 UTC$391,994.85

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about EWY

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 26, 04:16 PM UTC

FDV

$526,407

Liquidity

$183,115.00

Holders

1,182

Snipers

Not available

Risk

High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

High

Sentiment

Bearish

EWY (branded on-chain as 'iShares MSCI South Korea ETF - Backpack Securities', an unverified, unofficial token unaffiliated with BlackRock/iShares as far as any provided evidence shows) trades at $194.97, down 7.72% over 24h, with a tiny total supply of ~2,700 tokens and a fully diluted value of ~$526K. Liquidity is thin at $183.12K against a 24h sell volume of $1.23M, and sell pressure (77.5%) heavily outweighs buy pressure (22.5%). Holder data shows 1,182 addresses with the top 10 controlling 36.19% of supply, but no historical trend, wallet classification, or sniper data is available to assess distribution dynamics over time.

Key points

  • Name mimics a well-known TradFi ETF brand ('iShares MSCI South Korea ETF') despite no verified affiliation, description, or social links — a notable impersonation/branding risk flag
  • Extremely small total supply (~2,700 tokens) with high per-token price (~$195), unusual tokenomics structure
  • Heavy sell-side imbalance in the last 24h (77.5% sell vs 22.5% buy volume) despite more unique buyers being active in count terms at times
  • No sniper, mint/freeze authority, or holder-history data available, leaving significant blind spots in risk coverage

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24-48h

bearish

Price has fallen 7.72% over 24h and 2.82% over the last hour, with the most recent hourly candles showing a sharp spike to $240.63 followed by a swift rejection down to the $192-195 range. Momentum is negative and sell volume dominates, suggesting continued downside or consolidation risk near current support unless buy pressure returns.

Target low

$175

Target high

$205

Support

$192.69 (recent candle low), $194.40 (latest candle low)

Resistance

$213.46 (prior candle close), $240.63 (recent spike high)

Medium term · 7-14 days

neutral

With only three hourly candles of data provided and no longer-term OHLC history, medium-term direction cannot be reliably projected. The heavy sell pressure and thin liquidity ($183.12K) suggest continued volatility, but a durable trend call requires more data than is available.

Catalysts

  • Any resumption of buy-side volume/unique buyer growth
  • Liquidity additions or removals from the Raydium CLMM pool
  • Clarification (or lack thereof) on token legitimacy/branding, which could trigger de-risking or renewed speculative interest

Bullish factors

  • 24h buyer count (1,519) is meaningfully lower than seller count (2,098) but still shows active two-sided interest
  • Recent candle showed a sharp intra-hour rally to $240.63 before fading, indicating some speculative demand exists

Bearish factors

  • 24h sell volume ($1.23M) is roughly 3.4x buy volume ($356.58K)
  • Price down 7.72% in 24h and continuing to decline in the most recent hour (-2.82%)
  • Thin liquidity ($183.12K) relative to daily volume increases slippage and volatility risk
  • Unverified, unofficial branding mimicking a real-world ETF name raises reputational/legitimacy concerns that could trigger rapid de-risking

Confidence: low. Only three hourly candles and a single day of trading analytics were provided, with no multi-day price history, holder trend history, or sniper data. This severely limits the reliability of any directional forecast; the analysis leans heavily on very recent, volatile price action.

EWY call history

Full track record →

Sep 26bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
EWY4ow...G5dv
Total Supply
2,699.973858 EWY

Key Risks

  • Token name explicitly mimics a well-known real-world ETF ('iShares MSCI South Korea ETF') with no verified affiliation, description, or social presence — a strong impersonation/branding red flag
  • Shallow liquidity ($183.12K) relative to 24h volume (~$1.59M) creates high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Sell volume ($1.23M) is roughly 3.4x buy volume ($356.58K) over 24h, and sellers (2,098) outnumber buyers (1,519), indicating net distribution/outflow
  • Extreme intra-hour volatility, including a spike to $240.63 followed by a rapid collapse to $192.69, suggesting possible manipulation or a thin order book vulnerable to large trades

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Across the 3 most recent hourly candles: Candle 1 opened at $201.78, rallied to a high of $220.04, and closed at $213.46 on volume of ~$99.9K. Candle 2 opened at $213.46, spiked sharply to a high of $240.63 (an intra-candle blow-off) before collapsing to a low of $192.69 and closing near the low at $195.14, on a massive volume spike of ~$3.97M — indicative of a sharp reversal/rejection. Candle 3 opened at $195.14 and consolidated in a tight range ($194.40-$195.78), closing at $194.59 on much lower volume (~$161K), suggesting the selling pressure has slowed but price has not recovered.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

The short-term trend is clearly down, driven by the sharp reversal in candle 2 from $240.63 to under $193, followed by tight consolidation just above $194. With only 3 candles of data, the medium-term trend cannot be firmly established beyond noting the price has stabilized in a narrow range after the drop.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

23%

Sell

78%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$192.69

Major support

$194.40 (most recent candle low, effectively current price floor)

Immediate resistance

$213.46

Major resistance

$240.63

Immediate support sits at the candle 2 low of $192.69, reinforced by candle 3's tight range holding above $194.40. The immediate resistance is the candle 1 close/candle 2 open level of $213.46, with major resistance at the $240.63 spike high, which now represents a significant overhead supply zone unlikely to be retested without a strong reversal in sentiment.

Notable patterns

  • Blow-off spike and rejection: candle 2 shows a large upper wick from $213.46 to $240.63 followed by a collapse to $192.69, a classic exhaustion/reversal pattern
  • Volume climax: an extreme volume spike (~$3.97M) on the reversal candle followed by a ~96% volume drop-off in the next candle, suggesting seller exhaustion or a liquidity/manipulation event
  • Tight-range consolidation candle immediately after a sharp selloff, which can precede either a bounce or a continuation lower depending on subsequent volume

Liquidity

Liquidity

$183,115.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of $183.12K is small relative to 24h trading volume (combined buy+sell volume of roughly $1.59M), a ratio that implies meaningful price impact for moderately sized trades — consistent with the extreme intra-candle volatility observed (a swing from $192.69 to $240.63 within a single hour). Sell volume ($1.23M) outweighs buy volume ($356.58K) by roughly 3.4x, and sellers (2,098) outnumber buyers (1,519) by count as well, indicating net capital outflow from the token over the past 24h. This combination of shallow liquidity and net selling pressure creates high slippage risk for both entries and exits.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

2,699.973858 EWY

FDV

$526,407 (also reported as $526.41K in trading analytics)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price swung from $213.46 to a $240.63 high and back down to $192.69 within a single hourly candle, and is down 7.72% over 24h with continued negative momentum in the last hour (-2.82%). This level of intra-hour volatility is extreme.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity of only $183.12K against 24h combined volume of ~$1.59M implies a thin market where sizable trades can move price significantly, increasing slippage risk for both buyers and sellers.

  • Concentrationmedium

    Top-10 holders control 36.19% of supply across 1,182 holder addresses (current snapshot only). This is a meaningful but not extreme concentration; however, no top-100 figure or historical trend data is available to fully assess concentration risk, so this assessment is based on limited current-snapshot data only.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Token name explicitly mimics a well-known real-world ETF ('iShares MSCI South Korea ETF') with no verified affiliation, description, or social presence — a strong impersonation/branding red flag
  • Shallow liquidity ($183.12K) relative to 24h volume (~$1.59M) creates high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Sell volume ($1.23M) is roughly 3.4x buy volume ($356.58K) over 24h, and sellers (2,098) outnumber buyers (1,519), indicating net distribution/outflow
  • Extreme intra-hour volatility, including a spike to $240.63 followed by a rapid collapse to $192.69, suggesting possible manipulation or a thin order book vulnerable to large trades
  • Mint/freeze authority status and contract verification are entirely unknown, leaving open the possibility of supply inflation or other adversarial contract behavior
  • No sniper or holder-history data is available, removing visibility into early-buyer behavior and whether large recent buyers are positioned to dump

Mitigating factors

  • Some two-sided trading activity persists, with 1,519 unique buyers still active in the 24h window despite the price decline
  • Top-10 concentration (36.19%) is elevated but not in an extreme majority-control range based on the single available snapshot

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total loss. The combination of unverified authority status, brand-mimicking naming with no substantiating documentation, shallow liquidity, heavy net selling pressure, and extreme short-term volatility makes this unsuitable for risk-averse investors or those seeking any degree of capital preservation. It should not be treated as any form of exposure to the actual iShares MSCI South Korea ETF.

EWY presents an extremely high-risk, speculative profile driven by brand-mimicking naming, shallow liquidity, and significant net selling pressure in the most recent 24-hour window. While short-term speculative trading opportunities may exist given the extreme volatility, the lack of verified contract/authority data, absence of sniper and holder-history data, and clear sell-dominant flow argue for substantial caution.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buy-side demand returns and liquidity deepens, the token could stage a recovery bounce off the ~$192-194 support zone toward the $213-240 resistance band seen in recent candles, particularly if speculative attention around the ETF-mimicking branding drives renewed interest.

  • Renewed unique buyer growth reversing the current sell-dominant flow (77.5% sell vs 22.5% buy)
  • Liquidity additions to the Raydium CLMM pool reducing slippage and enabling larger positions
  • Speculative momentum trading off the extreme volatility already observed

Base Case

Absent new catalysts, the token likely continues to trade in a volatile, sell-pressure-dominant range near current levels ($192-215), with periodic sharp spikes and reversals driven by its thin liquidity, while overall risk indicators (authority status, sniper exposure, holder history) remain unresolved due to data gaps.

  • No near-term resolution of unknown mint/freeze authority status
  • Liquidity remains near current ~$183K levels without major additions or removals
  • Trading activity continues to show sell-dominant flow similar to the past 24h observation window

Bear Case

High probability

Continued net outflows and thin liquidity lead to further price decay or a liquidity crunch, especially if the brand-mimicking name draws negative attention (e.g., delisting, community backlash, or exchange/platform action) or if unresolved authority risks manifest as supply dilution.

  • 24h sell volume already 3.4x buy volume with more sellers (2,098) than buyers (1,519)
  • Shallow $183.12K liquidity pool vulnerable to large sell orders causing sharp price drops, as seen in the candle 2 crash from $240.63 to $192.69
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open supply-side risks
  • Reputational risk from unverified branding referencing a real-world financial product could deter serious participants

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 26, 04:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-26 16:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, decimals, supply, FDV)
  • Raydium CLMM pair price and OHLC candle data (3 most recent hourly candles)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price % change)
  • Codex holder aggregate snapshot (holder count, top-10 concentration)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles were provided, insufficient for robust multi-day trend or pattern analysis
  • No sniper/early-buyer wallet data was available, preventing any assessment of sniper concentration, PnL, or dump risk
  • No historical holder count data (24h/7d/30d growth) was available, only a single current snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, contract verification, and mutability status were all listed as 'unknown' in metadata, preventing any rug-risk determination from authorities
  • Token metadata (name, symbol, description) is creator-supplied and untrusted; naming that mimics a real-world financial product ('iShares MSCI South Korea ETF') could not be independently verified as legitimate or fraudulent from the data provided

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, potentially incomplete on-chain and market data, some of which is supplied by the token's creator and should be treated as unverified. Cryptocurrency trading, especially in low-liquidity, newly-created, or unverified tokens, carries substantial risk of loss, including total loss of capital. This token's name references a real-world financial product ('iShares MSCI South Korea ETF') with no verified affiliation; do not assume any connection to or legitimacy from that real-world entity. Always conduct independent due diligence and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is iShares MSCI South Korea ETF - Backpack Securities ownership?

As of 2026-09-26 16:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 36.19% of supply. It reports 1,182 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling iShares MSCI South Korea ETF - Backpack Securities?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-26 16:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $356,583.00 in buys and $1,227,892.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is iShares MSCI South Korea ETF - Backpack Securities liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +219.66%, from $122,627.46 (2026-09-26 14:00 UTC) to $391,994.85 (2026-09-26 16:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF - Backpack Securities (EWY)?

Price has fallen 7.72% over 24h and 2.82% over the last hour, with the most recent hourly candles showing a sharp spike to $240.63 followed by a swift rejection down to the $192-195 range. Momentum is negative and sell volume dominates, suggesting continued downside or consolidation risk near current support unless buy pressure returns. Short-term outlook is bearish (24-48h), with a target range of $175 to $205.

Is EWY a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 82/100. This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total loss. The combination of unverified authority status, brand-mimicking naming with no substantiating documentation, shallow liquidity, heavy net selling pressure, and extreme short-term volatility makes this unsuitable for risk-averse investors or those seeking any degree of capital preservation. It should not be treated as any form of exposure to the actual iShares MSCI South Korea ETF.

What are the key risks of holding EWY?

Token name explicitly mimics a well-known real-world ETF ('iShares MSCI South Korea ETF') with no verified affiliation, description, or social presence — a strong impersonation/branding red flag • Shallow liquidity ($183.12K) relative to 24h volume (~$1.59M) creates high slippage and manipulation risk • Sell volume ($1.23M) is roughly 3.4x buy volume ($356.58K) over 24h, and sellers (2,098) outnumber buyers (1,519), indicating net distribution/outflow

← Back to all predictions

Track EWY