ピングー

Pingu Price Prediction 2026

ピングー
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 10, 2026

DuTixhgFbpjcR2yUDWGVqKsSVzkwu8BjWrDYTCUypump

$0.059895

+6.80%

FDV $9,892

LiveContract:DuTixhgFbpjcR2yUDWGVqKsSVzkwu8BjWrDYTCUypumpChain:SolanaHolders:488Market cap:$9,892

More tokens on Solana

urcoin

urcoin

ur coin

$0.05895821.9%
MC $6.5K
ice

ice

ice bucket challenge

$0.0417176.5%
MC $17.2K
fomodog

fomodog

fomodog

$0.0541325.7%
MC $4.0K
COBY

COBY

cobywifhat

$0.0415084.0%
MC $14.6K
SPACEX

SPACEX

SpaceX PreStocks

$5120.8%
MC $4.48M
TRUMP

TRUMP

OFFICIAL TRUMP

$2.572.3%
MC $2.57B

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about ピングー

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jul 10, 05:17 AM
FDV

$76,503

Liquidity

$37,967

Holders

510

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Pingu (ピングー) is a PumpFun-launched meme token on Solana (mint: DuTixhgFbpjcR2yUDWGVqKsSVzkwu8BjWrDYTCUypump) with a 1 billion token supply and a fully diluted valuation of ~$67.66K–$76.5K. The token has experienced an explosive 102% price surge in the past 24 hours, but the on-chain data reveals several serious red flags: extremely thin liquidity (~$37.97K), heavy sell pressure (61.8% sell volume), a suspicious holder history (flat at 22 holders for 30 days, then +488 in 24 hours), missing top-holder data, and an unverified contract. The token is extremely high risk and suitable only for highly speculative participants.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
102%+ 24h price surge on very thin $37.97K liquidity — highly manipulable
Holder count was frozen at exactly 22 for 30 consecutive days, then exploded +488 in 24h — anomalous pattern suggesting coordinated activity
No top-holder data available, supply concentration metrics show 0% for top 10 and top 100 — data gap raises transparency concerns
Unverified contract, unknown update authority, launched via PumpFun (pump.fun suffix on mint)
Sell pressure dominates at 61.8% of 24h volume ($124.20K sells vs $76.89K buys)

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token just posted a 102% 24h gain and a 39.9% 5-minute spike, but sell pressure is dominant at 61.8% of volume ($124.20K sells vs $76.89K buys). With only $37.97K in liquidity, any moderate sell order will cause severe slippage. The most recent hourly candle (05:00 UTC) shows a pullback from the $0.0000953 high to close at $0.0000776, confirming distribution pressure. Short-term outlook is bearish as early buyers take profits.

Target low$0.000032
Target high$0.000095
Support: $0.0000727 (candle [1] open / prior close), $0.0000733 (candle [2] close), $0.0000320 (candle [2] low — major support)
Resistance: $0.0000833 (candle [1] high), $0.0000951 (candle [2] high — key resistance / recent peak)

Medium term

bearish
1–7 days

Without sustained buying interest, new utility, or a broader meme cycle catalyst, the token is likely to retrace sharply. The holder base grew from 22 to 510 in a single day — a pattern consistent with a pump-and-dump cycle. If early holders (who held through 30 days of dormancy) begin distributing, the thin liquidity will amplify downside moves dramatically.

Catalysts
  • Sustained buy volume exceeding $124K/day to absorb sell pressure
  • Viral social media traction driving new buyer inflows
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Whale accumulation visible on-chain

Bullish factors

  • 102%+ 24h price gain demonstrates strong short-term momentum
  • 39.9% 5-minute price spike suggests active speculative interest
  • 2,235 buy transactions in 24h shows real trading activity
  • 490 unique buyers in 24h indicates broad (if shallow) interest

Bearish factors

  • 61.8% sell pressure dominates 24h volume ($124.20K sells vs $76.89K buys)
  • Only $37.97K total liquidity — extremely shallow, high slippage risk
  • Holder count was exactly 22 for 30 consecutive days — highly suspicious dormancy
  • No top-holder transparency — supply concentration data shows 0% (data gap)
  • Unverified contract, unknown update authority
  • FDV of only ~$67–76K — micro-cap with extreme volatility risk
  • 864 unique sellers vs 490 unique buyers in 24h — more sellers than buyers
Confidence: low. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, no top-holder data exists, sniper data is unavailable, and the token's history is anomalous (30 days flat at 22 holders). Price prediction confidence is low due to insufficient historical price data and opaque holder structure.

ピングー call history

Full track record →
Jul 10bearish
24h-71.0%
7d-32.2%
30d-79.5%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (04:00 UTC): O=$0.0000333, H=$0.0000951, L=$0.0000320, C=$0.0000733 — a massive bullish candle with a very long upper wick, indicating strong buying followed by significant profit-taking. The body closed well below the high, a bearish signal. Candle [1] (05:00 UTC): O=$0.0000727, H=$0.0000833, L=$0.0000727, C=$0.0000776 — a smaller bullish candle that opened at the prior close and made a lower high ($0.0000833) vs candle [2]'s high ($0.0000951), forming a 'lower high' pattern. Volume collapsed from 122,726 to 20,574 — an 83% volume drop — confirming fading momentum.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 38%Sell 62%

The short-term trend is turning bearish: the most recent candle printed a lower high ($0.0000833) vs the prior candle's high ($0.0000951), and volume dropped 83%. The medium-term trend is sideways/unknown given only 2 candles of price history are available. The 30-day holder stagnation prior to today's pump suggests no sustained uptrend exists.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000727 (candle [1] open and low)
Major$0.0000320 (candle [2] absolute low)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0000833 (candle [1] high)
Major$0.0000951 (candle [2] high — recent peak)

The $0.0000727 level is the most immediate support, representing the open of the latest candle. A break below this level targets the $0.0000320–$0.0000334 zone (candle [2] open/low). On the upside, $0.0000833 is near-term resistance and $0.0000951 is the key level to reclaim for bullish continuation. Given thin liquidity, these levels can be breached rapidly.

Notable patterns

  • Long upper wick on candle [2] — bearish shooting star / profit-taking signal
  • Lower high on candle [1] vs candle [2] — early downtrend formation
  • 83% volume collapse from candle [2] to candle [1] — momentum exhaustion
  • Price opened candle [1] at candle [2]'s close — gap-less continuation with fading strength

Total holders510
24h Δ+488
7d Δ+488
30d Δ+488
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The +488 holder surge in 24h coincides precisely with the 102% price pump, suggesting the price spike attracted new retail buyers. However, the 30-day historical data shows the holder count was completely flat at exactly 22 from June 10 to July 9 — zero growth for 29 days. This means virtually all holder growth (488 out of 510 total, or 95.7%) occurred in a single 24-hour window, which is a hallmark of coordinated pump activity rather than organic growth.

The holder trend data is deeply anomalous. For 30 consecutive days (June 10 – July 9, 2026), the holder count was frozen at exactly 22 with zero net change every single day. Then on July 10, holders exploded from 22 to 510 (+488, +96%) in a single day. This pattern is inconsistent with organic growth and strongly suggests: (1) the token was dormant/controlled by a small group for a month, (2) a coordinated pump was executed, attracting 488 new retail buyers in 24h. The 7d and 30d growth figures both equal the 24h figure (488), confirming all growth is concentrated in this single event. Supply distribution data shows 0% for top 10 and top 100 — this data gap prevents full analysis of whether the original 22 holders are distributing to the 488 new entrants.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available — API returned no results for top 20 holders

0.00%

Top holder data is entirely unavailable — the API returned no results for the top 20 holders. The supply concentration metrics report 0% for both top 10 and top 100, which is almost certainly a data gap rather than a genuine reflection of perfectly even distribution. With only 510 total holders and a token launched via PumpFun, it is statistically near-certain that supply is highly concentrated. The original 22 holders who held the token for 30 dormant days likely control a significant portion of supply. The absence of this data is itself a transparency red flag. Distribution health is classified as 'very_concentrated' based on the anomalous holder history and data unavailability, not confirmed equal distribution.

Liquidity$37,970
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$76,890
Sell$124,200
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers490
Unique sellers864

Liquidity is critically shallow at $37.97K on PumpSwap (pair HQijWgETrprrurPwyU3U46MSCNS4viwLq2x2EJGg6zFc). The 24h trading volume of ~$201K is more than 5x the total liquidity pool — this ratio indicates extreme price sensitivity to individual trades. A sell order of even a few thousand dollars will cause severe slippage. Net flow is clearly negative (outflow): sell volume ($124.20K) exceeds buy volume ($76.89K) by $47.31K, and unique sellers (864) outnumber unique buyers (490) by 76%. The FDV of $67.66K–$76.5K vs $37.97K liquidity means roughly 50% of the market cap is in the liquidity pool — typical for a PumpFun token but still extremely thin in absolute terms. Market health is poor: high slippage risk, net outflow, and sell-dominated order flow.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1,000,000,000 (1 billion)
FDV$67,660–$76,503 (range from trading analytics vs metadata)

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token has a standard PumpFun supply of 1 billion tokens with 6 decimals. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' and the contract is unverified, making it impossible to confirm whether mint or freeze authorities have been renounced. The token is marked as 'mutable: false' which is a mild positive signal (metadata cannot be changed), but without confirmed authority renouncement, the risk of a rug pull via minting or freezing cannot be ruled out. The FDV discrepancy ($67.66K in trading analytics vs $76.5K in metadata) reflects the 102% price move during data collection. No description is provided, and the token has social links (Twitter, website, Moralis) but the contract is unverified. The PumpFun mint address suffix ('pump') confirms this is a pump.fun launch.

Volatility
high

102% price surge in 24h, 39.9% in 5 minutes. Only $37.97K liquidity means price can move 50%+ on small orders. Extreme volatility confirmed by candle [2] range: $0.0000320 low to $0.0000951 high — a 197% intra-candle range.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of $37.97K is critically thin. 24h volume ($201K) is 5.3x the liquidity pool. Any meaningful exit will cause severe slippage. Slippage risk is high for any position above ~$500.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is unavailable, but the 30-day dormancy at exactly 22 holders strongly implies highly concentrated supply. The original 22 holders likely control a large portion of the 1B token supply and are positioned to dump into the current pump.

SniperDump
medium

No sniper data is available. However, the anomalous holder pattern (22 holders for 30 days, then +488 in 24h) suggests coordinated early accumulation. The dominant sell pressure (61.8%) and 864 sellers vs 490 buyers is consistent with early holders distributing. Risk is elevated to medium despite no direct sniper confirmation.

Authority
medium

Update authority is 'unknown', contract is unverified, and mint/freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. The token is marked mutable:false which is a mild positive, but without on-chain verification of renounced authorities, rug risk via minting or account freezing cannot be excluded.

Key risks

  • Pump-and-dump pattern: 30 days of exactly 22 holders followed by +488 in 24h is a classic coordinated pump signature
  • Critically thin liquidity ($37.97K) — severe slippage on any meaningful exit
  • Dominant sell pressure: 61.8% of 24h volume is sells, 864 sellers vs 490 buyers
  • No top-holder transparency — supply concentration data unavailable
  • Unverified contract and unknown authority status — rug pull risk cannot be excluded
  • Micro-cap FDV (~$67–76K) — extremely susceptible to whale manipulation
  • No token description, no verified utility — pure speculative meme token
  • 83% volume collapse in the most recent hour — momentum fading rapidly

Mitigating factors

  • Token marked as mutable:false — metadata cannot be altered
  • Active trading with 986 unique wallets in 24h shows genuine market participation
  • PumpFun launch mechanism provides some baseline liquidity structure
  • Social links present (Twitter, website) — some level of project presence
  • No spam flag from data provider
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with PumpFun meme token dynamics. Position sizing should be minimal (treat as lottery ticket). This is NOT financial advice.

Pingu (ピングー) is a high-risk PumpFun meme token exhibiting classic pump-and-dump characteristics. The 30-day holder dormancy at exactly 22 wallets followed by a sudden +488 holder surge coinciding with a 102% price pump is the defining signal. Sell pressure dominates at 61.8%, liquidity is critically thin at $37.97K, and top-holder data is entirely unavailable. The only bull case is a continuation of speculative momentum in the very short term. The base and bear cases both point to significant downside.

Bull case (low)

Viral meme momentum continues: the Pingu/ピングー branding gains traction on social media (Twitter/X), attracting a new wave of retail buyers that overwhelms current sell pressure. Volume sustains above $200K/day, new holders continue accumulating, and the token breaks above the $0.0000951 resistance level, targeting $0.00015–$0.00020 range.

  • Viral social media catalyst (Twitter/X trending)
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Sustained buy volume exceeding current sell pressure
  • Whale accumulation from new large buyers

Base case

The token experiences a partial retracement of 40–60% from the 24h high as sell pressure continues to dominate. Price stabilizes in the $0.0000400–$0.0000600 range as speculative interest fades. Holder count stabilizes around 500–600 as new buyers stop entering. The token remains a micro-cap meme coin with no clear catalyst for sustained growth.

  • Sell pressure remains dominant but does not accelerate to a full dump
  • Some new buyers continue entering, partially offsetting distribution
  • Liquidity pool remains intact (no LP withdrawal)
  • No major social media catalyst emerges in the next 7 days

Bear case (high)

The pump collapses: the original 22 early holders continue distributing into the 488 new retail buyers. Sell pressure accelerates, liquidity is drained, and the price retraces to the pre-pump range of $0.0000320–$0.0000370. Given the thin liquidity, a full collapse to near-zero is possible if early holders dump aggressively.

  • Early holder distribution (original 22 wallets selling into pump)
  • Dominant sell pressure (61.8%) continues or accelerates
  • Liquidity exhaustion — $37.97K pool cannot absorb large sells
  • Fading momentum (83% volume drop in latest hour)
  • No fundamental utility or verified project backing

GeneratedJul 10, 05:17 AM
Data freshnessPrice and OHLC data current as of 2026-07-10T05:00 UTC. Historical holder data covers June 10 – July 9, 2026 (30 days daily). Only 2 hourly OHLC candles provided — severely limits technical analysis.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Moralis Solana Token API (metadata, price, OHLC, trading analytics)
  • On-chain holder metrics and historical holder series
  • PumpSwap pair data (HQijWgETrprrurPwyU3U46MSCNS4viwLq2x2EJGg6zFc)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Top 20 holder data entirely unavailable — supply concentration cannot be verified
  • Sniper analysis returned no data — smart money signals are inferred only
  • Update authority status is 'unknown' — mint/freeze authority renouncement cannot be confirmed
  • Supply concentration metrics show 0% for top 10 and top 100 — likely a data gap, not genuine equal distribution
  • Holder distribution categories (whales, sharks, dolphins, fish, octopus) all show 0 — data gap
  • Price change percentages for 1h, 6h, 24h all show 0% in trading analytics despite 102% 24h change in price metadata — data inconsistency noted
  • FDV discrepancy between metadata ($76,502) and trading analytics ($67,660) — reflects price movement during data collection

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total loss. The anomalous on-chain patterns identified (30-day holder freeze, sudden pump, dominant sell pressure) are serious red flags. Never invest more than you can afford to lose completely. Past price performance does not guarantee future results.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1,000,000,000 (1 billion)

Key Risks

•Pump-and-dump pattern: 30 days of exactly 22 holders followed by +488 in 24h is a classic coordinated pump signature
•Critically thin liquidity ($37.97K) — severe slippage on any meaningful exit
•Dominant sell pressure: 61.8% of 24h volume is sells, 864 sellers vs 490 buyers
•No top-holder transparency — supply concentration data unavailable

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper data is available for this token. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper activity. However, the broader trading data reveals concerning patterns: 864 unique sellers vs 490 unique buyers in 24h, and sell volume ($124.20K) exceeding buy volume ($76.89K) by 61.8% to 38.2%. The 30-day holder dormancy at exactly 22 wallets followed by a sudden +488 holder surge in 24h is a classic pump-and-dump signature — early holders (the original 22) may be distributing into the pump.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available — the sniper analysis endpoint returned no results for this token.

Highly suspicious. The token had exactly 22 holders for 30 consecutive days with zero net change, suggesting a tightly controlled pre-pump phase. These early holders are likely in significant profit given the 102% price surge and represent the primary distribution risk. Their sell behavior cannot be confirmed without top-holder data, but the dominant sell pressure (61.8%) is consistent with early-holder distribution.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for Pingu (ピングー)?

The token just posted a 102% 24h gain and a 39.9% 5-minute spike, but sell pressure is dominant at 61.8% of volume ($124.20K sells vs $76.89K buys). With only $37.97K in liquidity, any moderate sell order will cause severe slippage. The most recent hourly candle (05:00 UTC) shows a pullback from the $0.0000953 high to close at $0.0000776, confirming distribution pressure. Short-term outlook is bearish as early buyers take profits. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000032 to $0.000095.

Is ピングー a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with PumpFun meme token dynamics. Position sizing should be minimal (treat as lottery ticket). This is NOT financial advice.

How are ピングー holders trending?

Pingu currently has 510 holders and is growing (24h: 488, 7d: 488, 30d: 488). The holder trend data is deeply anomalous. For 30 consecutive days (June 10 – July 9, 2026), the holder count was frozen at exactly 22 with zero net change every single day. Then on July 10, holders exploded from 22 to 510 (+488, +96%) in a single day. This pattern is inconsistent with organic growth and strongly suggests: (1) the token was dormant/controlled by a small group for a month, (2) a coordinated pump was executed, attracting 488 new retail buyers in 24h. The 7d and 30d growth figures both equal the 24h figure (488), confirming all growth is concentrated in this single event. Supply distribution data shows 0% for top 10 and top 100 — this data gap prevents full analysis of whether the original 22 holders are distributing to the 488 new entrants.

What does sniper activity look like for ピングー?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding ピングー?

Pump-and-dump pattern: 30 days of exactly 22 holders followed by +488 in 24h is a classic coordinated pump signature • Critically thin liquidity ($37.97K) — severe slippage on any meaningful exit • Dominant sell pressure: 61.8% of 24h volume is sells, 864 sellers vs 490 buyers

← Back to all predictions

Track ピングー