GBULL

The Ginger Bull Price Today & AI Analysis

GBULL
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 20, 2026

DZHUbHzcedNzpfgqjTgrKu31fLr6hBT7h7hVxgpZpump

$0.056118

+5.24%

FDV $5,992

LiveContract:DZHUbHzcedNzpfgqjTgrKu31fLr6hBT7h7hVxgpZpumpChain:SolanaHolders:300Market cap:$5,992

More tokens on Solana

TOADPUNK

TOADPUNK

Toad Punk

$0.0529912.8%
MC $2.9K
DATBIHGAH

DATBIHGAH

Dat Bih Gah

$0.0435130.1%
MC $35.1K
MDUDAS

MDUDAS

Official Dudas

$0.0001041.8%
MC $104.0K
MOONDENG

MOONDENG

MOONDENG

$0.0550571.3%
MC $5.0K
SHROOM

SHROOM

Shroom

$0.0434670.1%
MC $34.7K
MSTR

MSTR

MicroStrategy

$0.000104863.0%
MC $10.35M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about GBULL

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jul 20, 05:17 AM
FDV

$124,401

Liquidity

$43,601

Holders

238

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

GBULL (The Ginger Bull) is a Solana-based memecoin launched on PumpSwap with a total supply of ~1 billion tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$124K at the time of analysis. The token has experienced an explosive 209% price surge in the past 24 hours, but this is accompanied by deeply concerning on-chain signals: a catastrophic 99% holder decline in 24 hours (from 473 to 238), sell pressure dominating at 59.9%, shallow liquidity of only $43.6K, and no top holder data available. The contract is unverified and update authority is unknown.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Extreme 24h price pump of +209.74% on very thin liquidity ($43.6K)
Catastrophic holder collapse: -99% in 24h (from ~473 to 238 holders)
Sell volume ($78.12K) significantly exceeds buy volume ($52.23K) despite price pump
No top holder data available, making concentration risk unquantifiable
Mutable=false metadata but update authority is unknown — authority risk unresolved
Zero holder distribution data (whales/sharks/dolphins all show 0%)

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token just posted a +209% pump on thin $43.6K liquidity with sell pressure at 59.9% and a -16.93% drop in the last 5 minutes. The holder base collapsed 99% in 24h. These are classic pump-and-dump signatures. A sharp reversion toward the pre-pump range (~$0.000025–$0.000037) is the most probable short-term outcome.

Target low$0.000020
Target high$0.000158
Support: $0.000065 (candle [1] open / prior resistance), $0.000037 (candle [6] close, pre-pump base), $0.000020 (candle [10] low)
Resistance: $0.000124 (current price / candle [1] close), $0.000158 (candle [1] all-time high in dataset)

Medium term

bearish
1–4 weeks

With only 238 holders remaining after a 99% collapse, no verified contract, unknown update authority, and a micro-cap FDV of $124K, sustained medium-term appreciation is highly unlikely without a significant new catalyst or community rebuild. Historical holder data shows the token was stagnant at 475 holders for weeks before declining.

Catalysts
  • Viral social media campaign driving new holder acquisition
  • Listing on a centralized exchange (highly unlikely at this FDV)
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally lifting all small caps
  • Community-driven buyback or burn event

Bullish factors

  • Strong 24h price momentum (+209.74%) could attract momentum traders
  • 1h price change of +45.15% shows recent buying interest
  • Mutable=false on metadata reduces one manipulation vector
  • Active social presence (Twitter, website, Moralis links)

Bearish factors

  • Holder count collapsed -99% in 24h (from ~473 to 238)
  • Sell volume ($78.12K) exceeds buy volume ($52.23K) by ~50%
  • Price dropped -16.93% in the last 5 minutes at time of analysis
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($43.6K) — large trades cause severe slippage
  • No top holder data available — concentration risk unknown
  • Unverified contract and unknown update authority
  • Token was stagnant (475 holders, zero net change) for ~3 weeks prior to pump
  • FDV of only $124K — very early/micro-cap with high failure rate
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to missing top holder data, unknown update authority, no sniper data, and extreme volatility. The 99% holder drop in 24h is anomalous and may reflect data issues or a genuine mass exit — either way it severely limits predictive reliability.

GBULL call history

Full track record →
Jul 20bearish
24h-83.3%
7d-83.7%
30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

The 10 hourly candles show a clear pump pattern beginning at candle [10] (low: $0.0000200) and accelerating through candles [5]–[1]. Candle [5] (01:00 UTC) was the breakout candle with a massive range from $0.0000373 to $0.0000902, closing at $0.0000702. Candle [1] (05:00 UTC, most recent) is the highest candle in the dataset, opening at $0.0000658, spiking to $0.0001579 (all-time high in dataset), and closing at $0.0001244 — a long upper wick suggesting distribution/rejection at the top. Candle [2] (04:00 UTC) shows a bearish close ($0.0000658) below its open ($0.0000827), indicating a failed attempt to hold gains. Candle [4] (02:00 UTC) is a small bullish candle with a tight range. Volume peaked in candles [3] and [4] ($13.4K and $22.7K respectively) during the pump phase.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
uptrend

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 40%Sell 60%

The token is in a short-to-medium term uptrend from the dataset perspective (price rose from ~$0.0000200 low to $0.0001244 current), but the long upper wick on candle [1] and the -16.93% 5-minute drop signal the uptrend may be exhausting. The trend is fragile given the thin liquidity and holder collapse.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000065 (candle [1] open, also candle [2] close)
Major$0.000020 (candle [10] low — dataset bottom)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000124 (current price / candle [1] close)
Major$0.000158 (candle [1] high — dataset all-time high)

The $0.000065 level is the most critical near-term support, representing the open of the most recent candle and the close of candle [2]. A break below this would likely accelerate selling toward the pre-pump base of $0.000037. The $0.000158 level is the only meaningful resistance, having been tested and rejected in candle [1].

Notable patterns

  • Long upper wick on candle [1] — bearish rejection/distribution signal at $0.000158 high
  • Bearish engulfing structure: candle [2] closes below candle [3] open
  • Parabolic pump pattern across candles [10]→[1] — classic pump-and-dump shape
  • Volume declining as price rises in candles [3]→[1] — bearish divergence
  • Candle [10] shows a long lower wick (low $0.0000200 vs close $0.0000264) — capitulation/accumulation wick at the bottom

Total holders238
24h Δ-99
7d Δ-100
30d Δ-100
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Strongly inverse and anomalous: price surged +209.74% in 24h while holders collapsed -99% (from ~473 to 238). This divergence is a major red flag — price pumping while holders flee is a hallmark of a coordinated pump-and-dump or wash trading scenario. Historically, the token sat at exactly 475 holders with zero net change for ~3 weeks (June 20 – July 2), suggesting either dormancy or artificial holder maintenance.

The holder data reveals a deeply concerning picture. From June 20 to July 2 (13 consecutive days), the holder count was frozen at exactly 475 — zero net change — which is statistically unusual and may indicate artificial or inactive holders. From July 3 onward, a slow decline began, accelerating sharply on July 19 (-107 holders, -29%) and continuing into the current 24h window (-235 holders, -99%). The current count of 238 represents a near-total collapse of the holder base. The 7d and 30d figures both show -100% net change relative to the starting point, meaning the token has lost essentially all holders it had 30 days ago on a net basis. This is one of the most severe holder decline signals possible.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available — concentration risk unquantifiable

0.00%

No top holder data is available for GBULL. The API returned zero supply concentration figures (top10=0%, top100=0%) and no holder list, which is itself a red flag — it may indicate data unavailability, a very recent token migration, or deliberate obfuscation. With only 238 total holders and a micro-cap FDV of $124K, concentration is almost certainly very high in practice. The distribution health is classified as 'very_concentrated' by inference. Investors should assume significant concentration risk until proven otherwise.

Liquidity$43,600
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$52,230
Sell$78,120
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers689
Unique sellers544

Liquidity is extremely shallow at $43.6K on a single PumpSwap pool (GeiN1JEjhqaDar4HM83HziC4eNFbrsYhzPMbP8PXPgVf). With a 24h trading volume of ~$130K against only $43.6K in liquidity, the liquidity-to-volume ratio is approximately 0.33x — meaning the pool turns over roughly 3x per day, indicating very high slippage risk for any meaningful position. Net flow is negative (outflow): sell volume ($78.12K) exceeds buy volume ($52.23K) by ~$25.9K despite the price pump, suggesting the pump may be driven by a small number of large buys against a backdrop of consistent selling. The 24h buyer count (689) exceeds seller count (544), but sell volume per seller is higher, indicating larger average sell sizes. This is consistent with early holders/insiders distributing to retail buyers.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,999,999.99
FDV$124,401

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

GBULL has a total supply of ~1 billion tokens (standard PumpFun/PumpSwap template). The FDV is $124.4K — a micro-cap. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, meaning mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. The token metadata shows mutable=false, which is a positive signal (metadata cannot be changed), but this does not address mint or freeze authority. The contract is unverified. Until mint authority is confirmed as renounced, there is a theoretical risk of additional token minting. The 'unknown' authority status is a meaningful gap in the risk profile. The token was launched on PumpSwap (formerly Pump.fun), which typically auto-renounces mint authority upon graduation — but this cannot be confirmed from the available data.

Volatility
high

Price surged +209.74% in 24h and dropped -16.93% in 5 minutes. The 9-hour range spans from $0.0000200 to $0.0001579 — a 690% range. Extreme volatility makes position sizing and stop-loss management nearly impossible.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity is only $43.6K on a single PumpSwap pool. Any sell order above ~$1K–$2K will incur severe slippage. Exit liquidity is critically thin relative to the trading volume.

Concentration
high

No top holder data is available, making concentration risk unquantifiable. With only 238 holders and a micro-cap FDV, extreme concentration is the most probable scenario. The 99% holder collapse in 24h suggests mass exit by a concentrated group.

SniperDump
medium

No sniper data is available. However, the pattern of a price pump coinciding with a 99% holder collapse and dominant sell volume is consistent with early buyer/sniper distribution. Risk is elevated by inference.

Authority
medium

Update authority is 'unknown'. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. Mutable=false on metadata is a partial positive. Until authorities are confirmed as renounced, a non-trivial rug risk exists.

Key risks

  • 99% holder collapse in 24 hours — near-total community exodus during the price pump
  • Sell volume ($78.12K) exceeds buy volume ($52.23K) — net outflow despite pump
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($43.6K) — high slippage and exit risk
  • No top holder data — concentration risk completely unquantifiable
  • Unknown update/mint/freeze authority — potential rug vector unconfirmed
  • Unverified smart contract
  • 13 consecutive days of zero holder change (June 20–July 2) — suggests artificial/inactive holder base
  • Price dropped -16.93% in 5 minutes at time of analysis — momentum already reversing
  • Micro-cap FDV ($124K) with no fundamental utility — pure speculation

Mitigating factors

  • Mutable=false on metadata — token description/image cannot be changed
  • Active social links (Twitter, website) suggest some community infrastructure
  • PumpSwap launch typically includes automatic mint authority renunciation (unconfirmed)
  • 24h buyer count (689) exceeds seller count (544) — some genuine retail interest
  • Not flagged as spam by the data provider
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of a 99% holder collapse, thin liquidity, unknown authorities, and pump-and-dump price action makes this one of the highest-risk tokens analyzable.

GBULL is a high-risk Solana memecoin exhibiting classic pump-and-dump characteristics: a parabolic price surge (+209.74% in 24h) on thin liquidity ($43.6K), coinciding with a catastrophic 99% holder collapse and dominant sell pressure. There is no fundamental utility, no verified contract, and no top holder transparency. The base case is continued price decline as the pump exhausts. Only a speculative bull case exists for very short-term momentum traders.

Bull case (low)

A viral social media moment or influencer promotion drives a new wave of retail buyers into the token, temporarily sustaining or extending the pump. The thin liquidity means even modest new inflows could push price significantly higher in the short term.

  • Viral Twitter/social media campaign attracting new retail buyers
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally creating a rising tide
  • Coordinated community buyback or burn reducing circulating supply
  • Momentum traders chasing the +209% 24h gain

Base case

The pump fades over the next 24–72 hours as selling pressure overwhelms thin liquidity. Price stabilizes somewhere in the $0.000030–$0.000065 range with a small residual holder base of 100–200 wallets. The token enters a prolonged low-activity phase similar to the June 20–July 2 stagnation period.

  • No major new catalyst or viral event emerges
  • Remaining 238 holders are a mix of bag-holders and long-term speculators
  • Liquidity remains at current shallow levels (~$43.6K)
  • Broader Solana market remains neutral to slightly positive

Bear case (high)

The pump fully reverses as early holders/insiders complete their distribution. Price retraces to pre-pump levels (~$0.000025–$0.000037) or lower. With only 238 holders remaining and no liquidity backstop, the token could lose 70–90% of its pumped value within hours to days.

  • 99% holder collapse signals mass exit already underway
  • Sell volume exceeds buy volume by ~$25.9K — net outflow confirmed
  • Price already dropped -16.93% in 5 minutes at analysis time
  • Thin $43.6K liquidity cannot absorb sustained selling
  • No fundamental utility or development activity to anchor price

GeneratedJul 20, 05:17 AM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 2026-07-20T05:00 UTC. Price and holder data may have changed since snapshot.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (Mint: DZHUbHzcedNzpfgqjTgrKu31fLr6hBT7h7hVxgpZpump)
  • PumpSwap pair data (GeiN1JEjhqaDar4HM83HziC4eNFbrsYhzPMbP8PXPgVf)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (10 candles, July 19–20 2026)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • Historical holder metrics (30-day daily series)
  • Holder distribution and concentration metrics
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • No top holder data available — concentration risk cannot be quantified
  • No sniper data available — early buyer behavior cannot be assessed
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' — mint/freeze authority status unconfirmed
  • Holder count anomaly (99% drop in 24h) may reflect data pipeline issues or genuine mass exit — cannot be distinguished from available data
  • 13 consecutive days of zero holder change may indicate data staleness rather than genuine stagnation
  • Only 10 hourly candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • No order book depth data — slippage estimates are approximate
  • Unverified contract — no audit or code review possible

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap memecoins, carry extreme risk of total loss. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,999,999.99

Key Risks

•99% holder collapse in 24 hours — near-total community exodus during the price pump
•Sell volume ($78.12K) exceeds buy volume ($52.23K) — net outflow despite pump
•Extremely shallow liquidity ($43.6K) — high slippage and exit risk
•No top holder data — concentration risk completely unquantifiable

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for GBULL. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper analysis. The broader on-chain picture — 59.9% sell pressure, a 99% holder collapse in 24h, and sell volume exceeding buy volume — suggests that early holders or insiders may be distributing into the pump. However, this cannot be confirmed without sniper/wallet-level data.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available for this token.

Unknown — no sniper data available. The extreme holder decline (-99% in 24h) and dominant sell volume suggest early buyers may be exiting, but this is inferred from aggregate metrics only.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for The Ginger Bull (GBULL)?

The token just posted a +209% pump on thin $43.6K liquidity with sell pressure at 59.9% and a -16.93% drop in the last 5 minutes. The holder base collapsed 99% in 24h. These are classic pump-and-dump signatures. A sharp reversion toward the pre-pump range (~$0.000025–$0.000037) is the most probable short-term outcome. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000020 to $0.000158.

Is GBULL a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of a 99% holder collapse, thin liquidity, unknown authorities, and pump-and-dump price action makes this one of the highest-risk tokens analyzable.

How are GBULL holders trending?

The Ginger Bull currently has 238 holders and is declining (24h: -99, 7d: -100, 30d: -100). The holder data reveals a deeply concerning picture. From June 20 to July 2 (13 consecutive days), the holder count was frozen at exactly 475 — zero net change — which is statistically unusual and may indicate artificial or inactive holders. From July 3 onward, a slow decline began, accelerating sharply on July 19 (-107 holders, -29%) and continuing into the current 24h window (-235 holders, -99%). The current count of 238 represents a near-total collapse of the holder base. The 7d and 30d figures both show -100% net change relative to the starting point, meaning the token has lost essentially all holders it had 30 days ago on a net basis. This is one of the most severe holder decline signals possible.

What does sniper activity look like for GBULL?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding GBULL?

99% holder collapse in 24 hours — near-total community exodus during the price pump • Sell volume ($78.12K) exceeds buy volume ($52.23K) — net outflow despite pump • Extremely shallow liquidity ($43.6K) — high slippage and exit risk

← Back to all predictions

Track GBULL