LILBUB

Lil BUB Price Today & AI Analysis

LILBUB
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 18, 2026

DLz4bLgo72D8QCpVLwJ1QVL7MvFxX2wq3diiW5ESpump

$0.052907

-0.72%

FDV $2,790

LiveContract:DLz4bLgo72D8QCpVLwJ1QVL7MvFxX2wq3diiW5ESpumpChain:SolanaHolders:842Market cap:$2,790

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about LILBUB

Report snapshotas of Jul 18, 11:19 AM
FDV

$81,651

Liquidity

$37,979

Holders

383

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

LILBUB (Lil BUB) is a Pump.fun-launched meme token on Solana with a total supply of ~1B tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$81.6K. The token is themed around the famous special-needs cat Lil BUB, with the creator claiming 100% of creator rewards will be donated to Humane World for Animals. The token is currently experiencing extreme volatility — up ~193% in 24h — but shows severe structural weaknesses: only $37.98K in liquidity, 383 current holders (down sharply from 1,140), dominant sell pressure (64%), and no top holder data available. The contract is unverified and update authority is unknown.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Charitable narrative: creator claims 100% of Pump.fun creator rewards donated to Humane World for Animals via The Giving Block
Extreme 24h price surge of ~193% despite net holder decline
Very low liquidity ($37.98K) relative to FDV ($81.6K), creating high slippage risk
Holder count has dropped sharply from 1,140 to 383 — a ~66% decline — suggesting significant distribution/exit activity
Unverified contract and unknown update authority add meaningful trust risk

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token has surged ~193% in 24h but is showing clear signs of exhaustion. The most recent candle (hour 1) shows a dramatic wick from H:0.0000734 down to C:0.0000165, indicating a sharp rejection at highs. Sell pressure dominates at 64% of volume. With only $37.98K in liquidity and holders declining sharply, a near-term pullback is highly probable.

Target low$0.000016
Target high$0.000082
Support: $0.000016 (recent candle close / intraday low), $0.000009 (candle 3 low)
Resistance: $0.000073 (candle 1 high / recent spike high), $0.000082 (current price / 24h high zone)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

Holder count has been flat at 1,140 for 30 days and has now collapsed to 383 — a structural deterioration. Without new catalysts, sustained community growth, or verified charitable proof, the token is likely to continue declining. The charitable narrative may attract periodic attention but is insufficient alone to sustain price.

Catalysts
  • Verified proof of charitable donations could attract positive media attention
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Influencer or community pickup of the Lil BUB narrative
  • Continued holder exodus and sell pressure would accelerate decline

Bullish factors

  • 193% 24h price surge demonstrates speculative demand exists
  • Charitable narrative provides positive PR angle
  • 1,454 unique buyers in 24h shows broad retail interest
  • Token is on PumpSwap, accessible to Solana retail traders

Bearish factors

  • 64% sell pressure vs 36% buy pressure in 24h
  • Holder count collapsed from 1,140 to 383 (~66% decline)
  • Only $37.98K total liquidity — extremely shallow
  • No verified contract, unknown update authority
  • Price spike appears to be a wick/pump with immediate rejection (candle 1 high vs close)
  • FDV of ~$81.6K is micro-cap with very limited institutional interest
  • 6h and 24h price change reported as 0% conflicts with 24h +193% — data inconsistency raises reliability concerns
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) only 3 hourly OHLC candles available, (2) no top holder data, (3) no sniper data, (4) anomalous holder metrics (negative 1h/24h/7d/30d changes suggesting data inconsistency), and (5) extreme volatility making short-term direction highly uncertain.

LILBUB call history

Full track record →
Jul 18bearish
24h-94.5%
7d-96.9%
30d

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle 3 (09:00): O:0.0000323, H:0.0000323, L:0.0000090, C:0.0000167 — a bearish candle with a long lower wick, suggesting a flush to 0.0000090 before partial recovery. Candle 2 (10:00): O:0.0000165, H:0.0000323, L:0.0000162, C:0.0000323 — a bullish engulfing-style candle recovering from lows back to the open of candle 3. Candle 1 (11:00): O:0.0000323, H:0.0000734, L:0.0000165, C:0.0000165 — a dramatic shooting star / bearish wick candle: price spiked to 0.0000734 (a 127% intrabar move) then collapsed back to 0.0000165, a classic pump-and-dump wick pattern. Note: OHLC data appears to have H/L fields swapped in the raw data (L > H in candle 1), which is a data quality concern; analysis uses the logical interpretation.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 36%Sell 64%

Short-term trend is bearish following the shooting star rejection at 0.0000734. The medium-term picture is sideways-to-down given the 30-day holder stagnation and recent collapse. The current price of ~0.0000817 is above recent candle closes, suggesting the price may have continued moving after the last candle.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000016 (repeated candle close / intraday floor)
Major$0.000009 (candle 3 absolute low)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000073 (candle 1 spike high)
Major$0.000082 (current price / 24h high zone)

The $0.000016 level has acted as a repeated close/floor across multiple candles and represents the most critical near-term support. A break below $0.000009 would signal capitulation. Resistance at $0.000073–$0.000082 is the spike zone from candle 1; reclaiming this level with volume would be needed to confirm bullish continuation.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / bearish wick in candle 1 (spike to 0.0000734, close at 0.0000165) — strong reversal signal
  • Bullish engulfing in candle 2 (recovery from 0.0000162 low to 0.0000323 close)
  • Flush and recovery in candle 3 (wick to 0.0000090, partial recovery)
  • Declining volume on price spike — bearish divergence
  • Possible OHLC data quality issue: H/L fields appear swapped in raw data

Total holders383
24h Δ-757
7d Δ-757
30d Δ-757
Accelerating Growth
No

Correlation with price

Inverse and concerning: price has surged ~193% in 24h while holders have collapsed by ~757 (from 1,140 to 383). This divergence — rising price with falling holders — is a classic distribution signal where remaining holders are selling into price strength driven by a smaller pool of new buyers.

The historical holder data shows a perfectly flat 1,140 holders for the entire 30-day period from June 18 to July 17, 2026, with zero net change on any day. The current holder count of 383 represents a sharp drop of 757 holders (-66.4%) that appears to have occurred very recently (within the last 24h based on the metrics). This sudden collapse is highly anomalous and may reflect: (1) a mass exit event coinciding with the price spike, (2) a data snapshot inconsistency, or (3) wallet consolidation. The 30-day flat line followed by a sudden cliff is a significant red flag. Note: the reported percentage changes (-260% for 1h, -200% for 24h/7d/30d) appear to be calculation artifacts rather than literal percentages.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

No top holder data available

Data unavailable — top holders endpoint returned no results

0.00%

No top holder data is available for LILBUB. The supply concentration metrics report top10=0% and top100=0%, which is almost certainly a data gap rather than a literal reading (it would be impossible for top 100 holders to hold 0% of supply). Without holder distribution data, concentration risk cannot be properly assessed. Given the token's Pump.fun origin and the dramatic holder count collapse, it is reasonable to assume significant concentration among a small number of wallets, but this cannot be confirmed from available data. The acquisition breakdown shows 477 transfers vs -94 swaps (net), suggesting some wallet consolidation activity.

Liquidity$37,980
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$78,180
Sell$138,770
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers1,454
Unique sellers1,442

Liquidity is critically shallow at $37.98K against an FDV of $80.19K — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~47%, which sounds reasonable but in absolute terms means any trade above a few hundred dollars will experience significant slippage. The 24h sell volume of $138.77K is 3.65x the total liquidity pool, confirming extreme turnover and slippage risk. Net flow is clearly negative (outflow): sell volume exceeds buy volume by $60.59K. Despite nearly equal numbers of unique buyers (1,454) and sellers (1,442), sellers are executing more transactions (4,056 vs 2,290), indicating sellers are more active and persistent. The token trades on PumpSwap (pair yKx6HvCQuv6r9X34QstThVEwcybLDDMVHWh5FN9yr9t), a Pump.fun native DEX with limited external liquidity routing.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,999,729.14
FDV$81,650.75

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is ~1B tokens (standard Pump.fun issuance). FDV is ~$81.6K, placing this firmly in micro-cap territory. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and the contract is unverified (verified contract: false). Mutable is set to false, which is a mild positive signal suggesting metadata cannot be changed. However, mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from available data — these are critical unknowns for a Pump.fun token. The token description contains a charitable donation narrative (100% of creator rewards to Humane World for Animals), but this is unverifiable on-chain from the provided data. Investors should independently verify authority renouncement on-chain before committing capital.

Volatility
high

193% 24h price surge followed by intrabar rejection of 78% from spike high. Only 3 candles of data show extreme intrabar volatility. The token can move 100%+ in a single hour.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of $37.98K is critically shallow. 24h sell volume of $138.77K is 3.65x the liquidity pool. Any meaningful position exit will face severe slippage.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is unavailable (reported as 0%), making concentration risk unquantifiable. The Pump.fun origin and holder collapse from 1,140 to 383 suggest significant concentration. Acquisition data shows 477 transfers, possibly indicating consolidation.

SniperDump
low

No sniper data is available, so sniper dump risk cannot be quantified. Rated low per methodology when data is absent, but the overall holder exodus and sell pressure suggest early participants have already distributed.

Authority
medium

Update authority is 'unknown', contract is unverified, and mint/freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. Mutable=false is a mild positive. The unknown authority status prevents full clearance of rug risk.

Key risks

  • Holder count collapsed 66% (1,140 → 383) coinciding with price spike — classic distribution pattern
  • Only $37.98K liquidity against $138.77K 24h sell volume — extreme slippage risk
  • Unverified contract and unknown update/mint/freeze authority
  • Charitable donation claims are unverifiable on-chain from provided data
  • Extreme price volatility: 193% up in 24h with intrabar swings of 100%+
  • No top holder data available — concentration risk cannot be assessed
  • Pump.fun meme token with no verified utility or development roadmap
  • 6h and 24h price change reported as 0% conflicts with 193% 24h change — data reliability concern

Mitigating factors

  • Mutable=false reduces metadata manipulation risk
  • Charitable narrative may attract positive community attention
  • 1,454 unique buyers in 24h shows genuine retail interest
  • Token is on PumpSwap with an active trading pair
  • Description references verifiable external donation infrastructure (The Giving Block)
Suitable for: Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, long-term holders, or anyone allocating more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. This is a micro-cap meme token with extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, declining holders, and multiple unresolved authority risks.

LILBUB is a high-risk Pump.fun meme token riding a charitable narrative around the famous Lil BUB cat. The 193% 24h price surge is occurring against a backdrop of collapsing holder count, dominant sell pressure, and critically shallow liquidity. The token has speculative appeal but lacks the structural foundations for sustained value. The charitable angle is unverified and the authority structure is opaque.

Bull case (low)

The charitable donation narrative gains viral traction on social media, attracting a wave of new holders. Verified proof of donations to Humane World for Animals is published, creating positive press. Broader Solana meme coin market rallies, lifting all boats. Liquidity deepens as new participants enter.

  • Viral social media pickup of the Lil BUB / charitable narrative
  • Verified on-chain proof of donations published by creator
  • Broader Solana meme season rally
  • Influencer endorsement or animal welfare community adoption

Base case

The token experiences a post-pump consolidation and gradual decline. A small community of ~200–400 holders remains, trading sporadically. Price stabilizes at a fraction of the spike high. The charitable narrative keeps the token alive but does not drive meaningful growth.

  • Price retraces 50–80% from spike high over 7–14 days
  • Holder count stabilizes around 200–400
  • Liquidity remains shallow but sufficient for small trades
  • No major new catalysts emerge
  • Creator follows through on donation claims but impact on price is minimal

Bear case (high)

The price spike proves to be a short-lived pump. Remaining 383 holders continue to exit, liquidity dries up further, and the token fades into obscurity. The charitable claims are never verified, eroding trust. The token becomes illiquid and effectively untradeable.

  • Continued holder exodus (already down 66% from peak)
  • 64% sell pressure dominance persisting
  • No new catalysts or community development
  • Shallow liquidity making exit increasingly difficult
  • Unverified charitable claims failing to attract sustained interest

GeneratedJul 18, 11:19 AM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of analysis time. OHLC data covers last 3 hours. Holder historical data current to July 17, 2026 (1-day lag). Sniper and top holder data unavailable.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (Mint: DLz4bLgo72D8QCpVLwJ1QVL7MvFxX2wq3diiW5ESpump)
  • Price feed (USD and WSOL native)
  • OHLC candle data (3 hourly candles, 2026-07-18T09:00–11:00Z)
  • Trading analytics (24h volume, buy/sell breakdown, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics (total, acquisition breakdown, change intervals)
  • Historical holder series (30-day daily, June 18 – July 17, 2026)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)
  • Top holders endpoint (returned no data)
  • PumpSwap pair data (yKx6HvCQuv6r9X34QstThVEwcybLDDMVHWh5FN9yr9t)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • No top holder data — concentration risk cannot be quantified
  • No sniper data — early buyer behavior cannot be assessed
  • OHLC data appears to have H/L fields potentially swapped in raw data (candle 1: L > H numerically), creating interpretation uncertainty
  • Holder change percentages (-260%, -200%) appear to be calculation artifacts
  • 6h and 24h price change reported as 0% conflicts with 193% 24h change — possible data pipeline inconsistency
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status all unknown
  • Charitable donation claims are unverifiable from provided on-chain data
  • Token is very new with limited price history

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. All data is sourced from on-chain and market feeds and may contain errors or gaps. The charitable narrative described in the token metadata has not been independently verified. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,999,729.14

Key Risks

Holder count collapsed 66% (1,140 → 383) coinciding with price spike — classic distribution pattern
Only $37.98K liquidity against $138.77K 24h sell volume — extreme slippage risk
Unverified contract and unknown update/mint/freeze authority
Charitable donation claims are unverifiable on-chain from provided data

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for LILBUB. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper analysis. The broader trading data shows 4,056 sells vs 2,290 buys in 24h, with 1,442 unique sellers vs 1,454 unique buyers — nearly equal participant counts but significantly more sell transactions, suggesting existing holders are distributing aggressively while new buyers are entering in smaller increments. The holder count collapse from 1,140 to 383 strongly implies early holders have largely exited.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available — endpoint returned no results.

Likely negative — the 66% decline in holder count from 1,140 to 383 suggests the majority of early holders have sold. The 24h sell volume of $138.77K vs buy volume of $78.18K confirms net outflow.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Lil BUB (LILBUB)?

The token has surged ~193% in 24h but is showing clear signs of exhaustion. The most recent candle (hour 1) shows a dramatic wick from H:0.0000734 down to C:0.0000165, indicating a sharp rejection at highs. Sell pressure dominates at 64% of volume. With only $37.98K in liquidity and holders declining sharply, a near-term pullback is highly probable. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000016 to $0.000082.

Is LILBUB a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, long-term holders, or anyone allocating more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. This is a micro-cap meme token with extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, declining holders, and multiple unresolved authority risks.

How are LILBUB holders trending?

Lil BUB currently has 383 holders and is declining (24h: -757, 7d: -757, 30d: -757). The historical holder data shows a perfectly flat 1,140 holders for the entire 30-day period from June 18 to July 17, 2026, with zero net change on any day. The current holder count of 383 represents a sharp drop of 757 holders (-66.4%) that appears to have occurred very recently (within the last 24h based on the metrics). This sudden collapse is highly anomalous and may reflect: (1) a mass exit event coinciding with the price spike, (2) a data snapshot inconsistency, or (3) wallet consolidation. The 30-day flat line followed by a sudden cliff is a significant red flag. Note: the reported percentage changes (-260% for 1h, -200% for 24h/7d/30d) appear to be calculation artifacts rather than literal percentages.

What does sniper activity look like for LILBUB?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding LILBUB?

Holder count collapsed 66% (1,140 → 383) coinciding with price spike — classic distribution pattern • Only $37.98K liquidity against $138.77K 24h sell volume — extreme slippage risk • Unverified contract and unknown update/mint/freeze authority

Track LILBUB