ANX

ANX Price Prediction 2026

ANX
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of May 1, 2026

DLeMPREVH4nBeAqyYbE3wYffaeVH7QrdtwCJJ8XBr1iL

$0.052762

-0.10%

FDV $2,707

LiveContract:DLeMPREVH4nBeAqyYbE3wYffaeVH7QrdtwCJJ8XBr1iLChain:SolanaHolders:39,581Market cap:$2,707

More tokens on Solana

Bullji

Bullji

Bullmoji

$0.0522450.0%
MC $2.2K
MSGA

MSGA

Make Solana Great Again

$0.0526630.0%
MC $2.2K
LILBUB

LILBUB

Lil BUB

$0.0521621.8%
MC $2.1K
CHARLIE

CHARLIE

Justice for Charlie

$0.0514060.0%
MC $1.4K
RIO

RIO

Satrio Wiratama

$0.0516210.0%
MC $1.6K
arc

arc

AI Rig Complex

$0.060614.9%
MC $60.63M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about ANX

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of May 1, 08:17 PM
FDV

$125,974

Liquidity

$0

Holders

39,342

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

ANX is a Solana-based token associated with the 'Ant.fun' AI ecosystem incubator, with a total supply of ~979.97M tokens and a current price of ~$0.000129. The token experienced a catastrophic -99.85% price collapse within the 24-hour window, dropping from ~$0.0843 to ~$0.000129. The contract is unverified, mutable, and the update authority has not been renounced, presenting significant rug/manipulation risk. Supply is extremely concentrated, with the top holder controlling 77.45% and the top 10 holding 91.08%. Despite 39,342 total holders and 30-day growth of ~22%, the recent price collapse and structural red flags make this a very high-risk asset.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Catastrophic 24h price collapse of -99.85%, from ~$0.0843 to ~$0.000129
Extreme supply concentration: top holder holds 77.45%, top 10 hold 91.08%
8.86% of supply held by the 1nc1nerator burn address, reducing effective circulating supply
No snipers detected in first 1000 blocks — unusual for a Solana launch token
Mutable metadata with non-renounced update authority (7Mt9MocwCLcAyQihy6i3ekQWCyg87xRMesrytgC5QN5S)
30-day holder growth of +22% (+8,609 holders) despite price collapse

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–72 hours

The token has already suffered a near-total collapse (-99.85% in 24h). The current price of ~$0.000129 represents a micro-cap remnant. Short-term price action shows a brief 1h recovery of +24.98% and 5m gain of +9.29%, suggesting a dead-cat bounce off the post-crash lows (~$0.0000031 seen in candle [1]). However, with zero reported liquidity, extreme concentration, and a mutable contract, any recovery is fragile.

Target low$0.0000031
Target high$0.000200
Support: $0.0000031 (post-crash low, candle [1] low), $0.000091 (candle [1] low before spike)
Resistance: $0.000167 (candle [1] high), $0.000982 (candle [2] high), $0.0843 (pre-crash price range)

Medium term

bearish
1–4 weeks

Unless the project delivers concrete utility or a major catalyst, recovery to pre-crash levels (~$0.084) is extremely unlikely given the structural issues: zero liquidity reported, extreme whale concentration, mutable contract, and a post-crash holder decline. The token may stabilize at near-zero levels or face further distribution from large holders.

Catalysts
  • Announcement of verifiable AI product or partnership
  • Renouncement of mint/freeze/update authorities
  • Major exchange listing or liquidity injection
  • Buyback or burn program by the project team

Bullish factors

  • 5m price up +9.29% and 1h up +24.98% suggesting short-term bounce
  • 8.86% of supply burned (held by 1nc1nerator), reducing effective supply
  • 30-day holder growth of +22% (+8,609 holders) shows prior community interest
  • 54.9% buy pressure in 24h volume ($9.46K buys vs $7.78K sells)
  • 488 buys vs 338 sells in 24h

Bearish factors

  • Catastrophic -99.85% price collapse in 24h
  • Total liquidity reported as $0.00 — effectively illiquid
  • Top holder controls 77.45% of supply (759M tokens)
  • Top 10 holders control 91.08% of supply
  • Contract is mutable with non-renounced update authority
  • Unverified contract
  • Holder count declining: -115 in 24h, -49 in 1h
  • FDV collapsed to ~$126K from implied ~$82M pre-crash
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extreme price dislocation (99.85% crash), zero reported liquidity, mutable/unverified contract, and the absence of sniper data. The OHLC data shows a dramatic regime change between candles [3] and [2], suggesting a possible token migration, price manipulation, or liquidity removal event rather than organic trading.

Deep Analysis

The 22-candle hourly OHLC dataset reveals two distinct price regimes separated by a catastrophic collapse. Candles [22] through [3] (Apr 30 21:00 – May 1 17:00) show ANX trading in a tight range of ~$0.0829–$0.0860, with low volatility and modest volume (5–4,694 USD per candle). Candle [1] (May 1 20:00) opens at $0.0000973 — a 99.88% gap-down from the prior candle's close of $0.0847 — reaching a low of $0.0000917 and closing at $0.00000315. Candle [2] (May 1 19:00) shows a recovery from $0.00000309 to $0.0000982 with volume of $32,124, the highest in the dataset. This pattern is consistent with a liquidity removal or rug event followed by a partial dead-cat bounce.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trendincreasing
Buy 55%Sell 45%

Both short-term and medium-term trends are decisively bearish following the -99.85% collapse. The pre-crash consolidation range ($0.0829–$0.0860) now acts as a massive overhead resistance zone. The post-crash price of ~$0.000129 is 99.85% below the 22-candle range midpoint.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000031 (candle [1] close / post-crash low)
Major$0.0000917 (candle [1] low)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000167 (candle [1] high)
Major$0.0843–$0.0860 (pre-crash consolidation range)

The pre-crash price range of $0.0829–$0.0860 (candles [3]–[22]) now represents a massive resistance ceiling. Immediate resistance sits at $0.000167 (candle [1] high). The post-crash low of ~$0.00000309 (candle [2] open / candle [1] close) is the critical support floor. A sustained hold above $0.000091 would be the first sign of stabilization.

Notable patterns

  • Catastrophic gap-down: candle [1] opens 99.88% below candle [3] close — indicative of liquidity removal or rug event
  • Dead-cat bounce: candle [2] shows a recovery from $0.00000309 to $0.0000982 on the highest volume in the dataset ($32,124)
  • Pre-crash consolidation: candles [3]–[22] show a tight range ($0.0829–$0.0860) with declining volume — classic distribution pattern
  • Candle [1] has an extremely long upper wick relative to close, suggesting failed recovery attempt within the hour
  • Volume climax at candle [2] post-crash — typical of panic buying/short covering after a rug event

Total holders39,342
24h Δ-0.29
7d Δ+2
30d Δ+22
Accelerating Growth
No

Correlation with price

Holder growth was strongly positive during the 30-day period when price was stable/rising (~$0.083–$0.086), with major spikes on Apr 5 (+4,135, +12%), Apr 6 (+2,091, +5.7%), and Apr 11 (+1,043, +2.7%). Following the price collapse, holders are now declining: -115 in 24h and -49 in the last hour. This negative correlation post-crash suggests holders are exiting as price collapses.

Total holders stand at 39,342 as of the latest data. The 30-day growth of +22% (+8,609 holders) was driven by several large single-day spikes (Apr 5: +4,135; Apr 6: +2,091; Apr 11: +1,043; Apr 26: +847), likely corresponding to marketing campaigns or airdrop events (91 airdrop acquisitions noted). The majority of holders acquired via transfer (37,200) rather than swap (2,051), suggesting many received tokens rather than buying them. Recent trend has reversed to declining: -115 in 24h and -49 in 1h following the price crash. The distribution shows 17 whales, 7 sharks, 124 dolphins, 233 fish, and 945 octopus-tier holders, indicating a heavily whale-dominated structure.

Top 10 hold91.08%
Top 100 hold94.21%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

82apokz3SQwc5PEd5odXLZHMbsk6okoUgAdBEhEWcVpV

Project treasury or team wallet — holds 759M of ~980M total supply (77.45%). This extreme concentration is a critical red flag.

77.45%

1nc1nerator11111111111111111111111111111111

Burn address — 86.86M tokens (8.86%) have been sent to the Solana incinerator, permanently removing them from circulation.

8.86%

8a7KPUEkhQLQ3LJuF3RhFReFcuzk31tb9YiMKxXGf4v7

Individual whale or early investor — holds 20.5M tokens (2.09%).

2.09%

7HHMX4fkpRaxDxPnzVowYie5CqZnKT7JtRqkirp7LsmX

Individual whale — holds 9M tokens (0.92%).

0.92%

3QeWwasacZjee3DeP8btvo1ZtubFiSTSc7zH38WuFvax

Individual whale or early investor — holds ~3.87M tokens (0.40%).

0.40%

The whale map is extremely concerning. A single wallet (82apokz3SQwc5PEd5odXLZHMbsk6okoUgAdBEhEWcVpV) controls 77.45% of total supply (759M tokens). At the pre-crash price of ~$0.084, this position was worth ~$63.8M. The top 10 wallets collectively hold 91.08% of supply, and the top 100 hold 94.21%, leaving only ~5.79% of supply distributed among the remaining ~39,200+ holders. The burn address (1nc1nerator) holds 8.86%, which is positive as it reduces circulating supply, but the dominant single-wallet concentration makes this token extremely vulnerable to a single actor's decisions. The post-crash price action is consistent with the top holder distributing or removing liquidity.

Liquidity$0.00 (reported)
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$9,460
Sell$7,780
Net flow
inflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers76
Unique sellers85

Liquidity is reported as $0.00 in the trading analytics, which is a critical red flag indicating the liquidity pool on Meteora Dynamic AMM v2 (pair 7DxjLQ5K8wLfmziNsKHpm97bpTv8ckgc4DEuX5VatLea) has been effectively drained or removed. The FDV is also reported as $0.00 in analytics (vs $125,974 from metadata), suggesting a data discrepancy or near-zero pool state. Despite this, 24h trading activity shows $9.46K in buys (488 transactions, 76 unique buyers) and $7.78K in sells (338 transactions, 85 unique sellers), with a slight net inflow. However, with zero liquidity depth, any meaningful trade would cause extreme slippage. The 125 unique wallets active in 24h suggests residual speculative activity post-crash. The native price of 1,530.89 WSOL appears inconsistent with the USD price at current SOL rates, further suggesting data anomalies in the post-crash state.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply979,966,006.45 ANX
FDV$125,974.09 (metadata) / $0.00 (analytics — likely post-crash pool drain)

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token metadata shows the contract is mutable (Mutable: true) with an update authority of 7Mt9MocwCLcAyQihy6i3ekQWCyg87xRMesrytgC5QN5S — this is neither the burn address nor a known renounced authority, meaning the project team retains the ability to modify token metadata. Mint and freeze authority status are not explicitly provided in the data (marked as unknown). The contract is unverified (Verified contract: false). The combination of mutable metadata, unverified contract, and non-renounced update authority represents a high rug risk from authorities. Notably, 8.86% of supply (86.86M tokens) has been sent to the burn address (1nc1nerator), which is a positive signal, but insufficient to offset the authority risks. The description references 'Ant.fun' incubation and AI ecosystem utility, but no verifiable on-chain utility is evident from the data provided.

Volatility
high

The token experienced a -99.85% price collapse within 24 hours, from ~$0.0843 to ~$0.000129. This represents one of the most extreme volatility events possible in crypto markets.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity is reported as $0.00, meaning the liquidity pool has been effectively drained. Any attempt to sell meaningful quantities would face extreme slippage or complete inability to execute.

Concentration
high

The top holder controls 77.45% of supply (759M tokens). Top 10 holders control 91.08%. Top 100 hold 94.21%. This is an extreme concentration that gives a single actor near-total control over price.

SniperDump
low

No snipers were detected in the first 1000 blocks, so traditional sniper dump risk is absent. However, the extreme concentration in the top holder represents a functionally equivalent risk from a single large insider.

Authority
high

The contract is mutable with a non-renounced update authority (7Mt9MocwCLcAyQihy6i3ekQWCyg87xRMesrytgC5QN5S). The contract is unverified. Mint and freeze authority status are unknown. These factors allow potential post-deployment manipulation of token parameters.

Key risks

  • Single wallet controls 77.45% of total supply — extreme rug/dump risk
  • Zero liquidity reported — effectively impossible to exit large positions
  • -99.85% price collapse already occurred — may indicate completed rug pull
  • Mutable contract with non-renounced update authority
  • Unverified smart contract
  • Mint and freeze authority status unknown
  • 37,200 of 39,342 holders acquired via transfer (not swap) — suggests airdrop/distribution rather than organic buying
  • Post-crash holder decline (-115 in 24h) indicates community exodus

Mitigating factors

  • 8.86% of supply permanently burned (sent to 1nc1nerator)
  • No snipers detected in first 1000 blocks
  • 30-day holder growth of +22% prior to crash shows prior community interest
  • 54.9% buy pressure in 24h suggests some residual demand
  • 488 buy transactions vs 338 sell transactions in 24h
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of a completed near-total price collapse, zero liquidity, extreme supply concentration, and mutable/unverified contract makes this one of the highest-risk assets possible.

ANX presents as an extremely high-risk speculative token that has already experienced a near-total price collapse (-99.85% in 24h). The structural fundamentals — 77.45% single-wallet concentration, zero liquidity, mutable unverified contract — are consistent with a completed or ongoing rug pull. Any investment thesis must be grounded in the reality that the token may have already failed as a tradeable asset.

Bull case (low)

Dead-cat bounce / speculative recovery: If the price collapse was caused by a temporary liquidity removal that is subsequently restored, and the project team demonstrates verifiable AI utility, the token could recover a fraction of its prior value. The 30-day holder base of 39,342 and prior price stability at ~$0.084 suggest there was a functioning market.

  • Liquidity restoration to the Meteora AMM pool
  • Project team publicly addresses the crash and provides transparency
  • Renouncement of update/mint/freeze authorities to build trust
  • Verifiable AI product launch or partnership announcement
  • Buyback or burn program reducing the 77.45% top-holder concentration

Base case

Prolonged near-zero price with minimal trading activity: The token stabilizes at a micro-price level ($0.0001–$0.0003) with thin speculative trading but no meaningful recovery. The project may continue to exist nominally while delivering no real value.

  • Some residual speculative demand continues (76 unique buyers in 24h)
  • Liquidity remains near zero, preventing meaningful price discovery
  • Top holder does not fully exit remaining position
  • No new catalysts emerge to drive recovery or further collapse
  • Holder count continues to slowly decline as interest fades

Bear case (high)

Completed rug pull / total loss: The -99.85% collapse, zero liquidity, and extreme concentration are consistent with a completed exit scam. The top holder (77.45%) may have sold into the market or removed liquidity, leaving remaining holders with worthless tokens.

  • Zero liquidity makes recovery structurally impossible without new capital injection
  • Top holder retains 77.45% and could dump remaining holdings at any time
  • Mutable contract allows further parameter changes that could harm holders
  • Declining holder count (-115 in 24h) suggests community has lost confidence
  • No verifiable on-chain utility or product delivery evident from data

GeneratedMay 1, 08:17 PM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately May 1, 2026 20:00 UTC. OHLC data covers Apr 30 21:00 – May 1 20:00 UTC (22 hourly candles). Holder history covers Apr 1 – Apr 30, 2026.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Solana on-chain token metadata (mint: DLeMPREVH4nBeAqyYbE3wYffaeVH7QrdtwCJJ8XBr1iL)
  • Moralis price and OHLC data (hourly candles, 22 periods)
  • Trading analytics (24h volume, buyer/seller counts, price change intervals)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
  • Top 20 holder wallet data with balances and percentages
  • Sniper analysis (first 1000 blocks)
  • Meteora Dynamic AMM v2 pair data (7DxjLQ5K8wLfmziNsKHpm97bpTv8ckgc4DEuX5VatLea)

Limitations

  • Mint and freeze authority status not explicitly provided — marked as unknown
  • Total liquidity reported as $0.00 — may reflect post-crash pool drain or data lag
  • Sniper data is entirely absent (0 snipers, unknown USD sniped) — limits smart money analysis
  • The dramatic price regime change between candles (from ~$0.084 to ~$0.0001) may indicate a token migration or relaunch rather than organic trading, which would invalidate pre-crash OHLC as relevant technical levels
  • FDV discrepancy between metadata ($125,974) and analytics ($0.00) suggests data inconsistency
  • Update authority wallet (7Mt9MocwCLcAyQihy6i3ekQWCyg87xRMesrytgC5QN5S) not cross-referenced against known project wallets
  • No DEX pool composition data available to confirm liquidity drain

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, particularly in micro-cap and newly launched tokens, carry extreme risk of total loss. The data presented reflects a specific point in time and may not represent current market conditions. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply979,966,006.45 ANX

Key Risks

•Single wallet controls 77.45% of total supply — extreme rug/dump risk
•Zero liquidity reported — effectively impossible to exit large positions
•-99.85% price collapse already occurred — may indicate completed rug pull
•Mutable contract with non-renounced update authority

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No snipers were detected in the first 1000 blocks of ANX trading. This is unusual and may indicate the token was not launched via a typical Solana pump.fun or sniper-accessible mechanism, or that the launch data is incomplete. With zero sniper data available, smart money signals cannot be derived from early-buyer behavior. The absence of snipers does not necessarily indicate safety — the extreme concentration in the top holder (77.45%) suggests insider/team accumulation through other means.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No snipers detected in the first 1000 blocks. Sniper concentration is 0%.

Unknown — no sniper data available. However, the 30-day holder growth of +8,609 (+22%) prior to the crash suggests earlier buyers accumulated at much higher prices (~$0.083–$0.086) and are now deeply underwater following the -99.85% collapse.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for ANX (ANX)?

The token has already suffered a near-total collapse (-99.85% in 24h). The current price of ~$0.000129 represents a micro-cap remnant. Short-term price action shows a brief 1h recovery of +24.98% and 5m gain of +9.29%, suggesting a dead-cat bounce off the post-crash lows (~$0.0000031 seen in candle [1]). However, with zero reported liquidity, extreme concentration, and a mutable contract, any recovery is fragile. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–72 hours), with a target range of $0.0000031 to $0.000200.

Is ANX a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of a completed near-total price collapse, zero liquidity, extreme supply concentration, and mutable/unverified contract makes this one of the highest-risk assets possible.

How are ANX holders trending?

ANX currently has 39,342 holders and is declining (24h: -0.29, 7d: 2, 30d: 22). Total holders stand at 39,342 as of the latest data. The 30-day growth of +22% (+8,609 holders) was driven by several large single-day spikes (Apr 5: +4,135; Apr 6: +2,091; Apr 11: +1,043; Apr 26: +847), likely corresponding to marketing campaigns or airdrop events (91 airdrop acquisitions noted). The majority of holders acquired via transfer (37,200) rather than swap (2,051), suggesting many received tokens rather than buying them. Recent trend has reversed to declining: -115 in 24h and -49 in 1h following the price crash. The distribution shows 17 whales, 7 sharks, 124 dolphins, 233 fish, and 945 octopus-tier holders, indicating a heavily whale-dominated structure.

What does sniper activity look like for ANX?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding ANX?

Single wallet controls 77.45% of total supply — extreme rug/dump risk • Zero liquidity reported — effectively impossible to exit large positions • -99.85% price collapse already occurred — may indicate completed rug pull

← Back to all predictions

Track ANX