goblintown Price Today & AI Analysis

Q: Can I sell goblintown?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

Q: Is goblintown a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced traders with very high risk tolerance who are comfortable with near-total loss of capital. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone deploying meaningful capital. Given the pump-and-dump characteristics, even short-term speculation carries extreme risk.

goblintownSolanaAnalysis as of May 3, 2026

$0.0₅6411

Contract

Live

DJ15QJxVPFGv6kYhT6LvDGqG9b4aBFWQzavA7dGxpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

718

Market cap

$6,399

At a $1M market cap, $GOBLINTOWN would be $0.001002 (156x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is goblintown a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 28

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

0.03%2 insiders still holding

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about goblintown

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

BulljiBullmoji$0.0₅3024+0.0%MC $3.0K

FUTA柴犬ふう太$0.0₅2730+0.0%MC $2.5K

BLUEHOUSEThe Miracle House$0.0₅3037+0.8%MC $2.9K

UnccatUnc Cat$0.0₅2331-1.8%MC $2.2K

MSGAMake Solana Great Again$0.0₅3284+0.0%MC $2.7K

ZECZcash$1,276.76+3.7%MC $130.88M

goblintown: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-03 07:19 UTC

Holder addresses

874

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$16,051.82

How concentrated is goblintown ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 874 addresses (2026-05-03 07:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling goblintown?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is goblintown liquidity falling?: As of 2026-05-03 07:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $16,051.82. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-03 07:19 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of May 3, 07:19 AM UTC

FDV

$31,764

Liquidity

$16,051.82

Holders

874

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

goblintown (GOBLINTOWN) is a PumpFun-launched meme token on Solana (mint: DJ15QJxVPFGv6kYhT6LvDGqG9b4aBFWQzavA7dGxpump) that experienced a sharp pump-and-dump cycle within a single 24-hour window. The token surged from ~$0.000337 to a high of ~$0.000366 before collapsing over 90% to the current price of ~$0.0000318. Total liquidity stands at just $16.05K against an FDV of ~$30.64K, signaling an extremely thin and illiquid market. Sell pressure dominates at 78.4% of 24h volume ($501K sold vs $138K bought). Holder count dropped -66% in 24h (from ~1,455 to 874), confirming mass exit behavior.

Key points

Extreme 24h price collapse of ~90%, consistent with a classic pump-and-dump pattern
Sell pressure overwhelmingly dominant at 78.4% of 24h volume ($501.18K sells vs $138.39K buys)
Holder count crashed -66% in 24h (-581 holders), while the prior 30 days showed zero growth until the pump day
Top 10 holders control 41.63% of supply; top 100 control 83.26%, indicating very high concentration
20 identified snipers, the majority of whom realized profits of 100–376%, suggesting coordinated early accumulation and exit
Ultra-thin liquidity of $16.05K creates extreme slippage risk for any meaningful position

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–72 hours

bearish

The token is in freefall, down ~90% in 24h with no sign of stabilization. The most recent candle (candle [1]) shows a close of $0.0000318, well below the prior session highs. Volume is collapsing (candle [1] volume: $3,449 vs candle [24] volume: $146,471), and sell pressure remains dominant at 78.4%. The 5m change is -5.37% and 1h is -29.08%, indicating continued downward momentum. A brief dead-cat bounce is possible given the oversold conditions, but sustained recovery is unlikely without new catalysts.

Target low

$0.000010

Target high

$0.000050

Support: $0.000026 (candle [2] low), $0.000028 (candle [1] low), $0.000010 (psychological/near-zero floor)
Resistance: $0.000050 (candle [3]–[5] range), $0.000058 (candle [7]–[8] high), $0.000138 (candle [12] high / post-pump resistance)

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

bearish

The historical holder data shows the token was completely dormant for 30 days (461 holders, zero change from Apr 3 to May 1) before a single-day pump on May 2. This pattern is characteristic of a coordinated pump event with no organic community or utility. With snipers having already extracted profits of 100–376%, liquidity at $16.05K, and holders fleeing, medium-term recovery is highly unlikely without a new coordinated pump effort.

Catalysts

A new coordinated social media campaign could trigger another short-lived pump
Broader Solana meme coin market rally could provide temporary lift
Whale accumulation at depressed prices (not currently observed in data)

Bullish factors

Oversold conditions after a 90%+ drop could attract speculative dip buyers
1h holder count increased by +12 (+1.40%), suggesting some accumulation at lows
Candle [1] shows a slight recovery from the low ($0.0000282) to close at $0.0000318

Bearish factors

24h price decline of -90.09%, with 5m (-5.37%) and 1h (-29.08%) still deeply negative
78.4% sell pressure ($501.18K sells vs $138.39K buys) with 8,236 sell transactions vs 3,205 buys
Holder count collapsed -581 (-66%) in 24h
Total liquidity only $16.05K — any sell order causes massive slippage
Snipers realized 100–376% profits, indicating early money has already exited
Token was dormant for 30 days prior to pump — no organic community base
No verified contract, no social links, no description — zero fundamental backing

Confidence: medium. The directional bias (bearish) is supported by overwhelming on-chain evidence: 90% price collapse, 78.4% sell pressure, -66% holder loss in 24h, ultra-thin liquidity, and sniper profit-taking. Confidence is 'medium' rather than 'high' because meme tokens can experience sudden irrational pumps driven by social media, which is unpredictable.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: DJ15QJ...pump
Total Supply: 999,964,481.93

Key Risks

90%+ price collapse in 24h with continued downward momentum
Ultra-thin liquidity ($16,050) creating extreme slippage for any exit
78.4% sell pressure with 3.5:1 seller-to-buyer ratio
Holder count collapsed -66% in 24h (-581 holders)

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 24-hour OHLC series tells a clear pump-and-dump story. Candle [24] (08:00 UTC May 2) opened and closed at $0.000337–$0.000366, marking the peak. From candles [23] through [11], the token experienced a sustained downtrend with lower highs and lower lows: highs fell from $0.000366 → $0.000366 → $0.000263 → $0.000199 → $0.000157 → $0.000139 → $0.000061. Candle [12] (20:00 UTC) saw a massive sell candle: opened at $0.000137, briefly touched $0.000139, then collapsed to close at $0.0000535 on $27,214 volume — a bearish engulfing/crash candle. Candles [1]–[7] show continued deterioration with closes ranging $0.0000318–$0.0000577, all far below the peak. Candle [8] (00:00 UTC May 3) was a brief relief candle (close $0.0000576) but was immediately reversed. The most recent candle [1] closes at $0.0000318, near session lows.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

Both short-term and medium-term trends are firmly bearish. The token peaked at $0.000366 in candle [24] and has made a series of lower highs and lower lows across all 24 candles. No reversal pattern is confirmed. The brief bounce in candle [8] failed to hold, and candles [1]–[2] show continued selling pressure.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

22%

Sell

78%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000026 (candle [2] low of $0.000026019)

Major support

$0.000010 (psychological near-zero floor; no prior on-chain support identified below candle [2] low)

Immediate resistance

$0.000050 (candle [3]–[5] close range of $0.000041–$0.000050)

Major resistance

$0.000138 (candle [12] open / post-crash resistance zone)

Immediate support is the candle [2] low at ~$0.000026. Below that, there is no meaningful on-chain support visible in the 24h data. Immediate resistance is the $0.000050 zone where candles [3]–[5] consolidated. Major resistance sits at the $0.000138–$0.000157 zone (candles [12]–[13]), which would require a 4–5x recovery from current levels.

Notable patterns

Pump-and-dump: single peak candle [24] at $0.000366 followed by 23 consecutive lower candles
Bearish engulfing/crash candle at [12]: opened $0.000137, closed $0.0000535 on $27,214 volume — massive distribution
Dead-cat bounce attempt at candle [8] (close $0.0000576) immediately reversed by candle [7] (close $0.0000418)
Volume exhaustion: 97.6% volume decline from peak ($146,471) to most recent candle ($3,449)
Series of lower highs across all 24 candles confirming sustained downtrend

Liquidity

$16,051.82

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Market health is critically poor. Total liquidity of $16,050 against an FDV of $30,640 means the liquidity-to-FDV ratio is approximately 52% — but this is misleading because the FDV itself has collapsed 90%+ and the absolute liquidity is tiny. Any sell order above a few hundred dollars will cause severe slippage. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: $501,180 in sell volume vs $138,390 in buy volume (a 3.6:1 sell-to-buy ratio). Unique sellers (3,211) outnumber unique buyers (929) by 3.5:1. The number of sell transactions (8,236) vs buy transactions (3,205) further confirms overwhelming exit pressure. The pair trades on PumpSwap (GjJxdHcyd5NyMWryA7MfJwZyuYCwN19AUzQtmPnDSXWo), which is a low-liquidity venue. This token is effectively in a liquidity crisis — buyers cannot meaningfully enter or exit without significant price impact.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,964,481.93

FDV

$31,763.51

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
The token lost ~90% of its value in a single 24-hour period (from $0.000366 peak to $0.0000318 current). The 1h change is -29.08% and 5m change is -5.37%, indicating continued extreme volatility. This level of price action is consistent with a pump-and-dump event.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $16,050 on PumpSwap. Any sell order of meaningful size will cause severe slippage. The liquidity-to-volume ratio is critically low — $501K was sold in 24h against only $16K in pool liquidity, suggesting the pool has been largely drained during the dump.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

90%+ price collapse in 24h with continued downward momentum
Ultra-thin liquidity ($16,050) creating extreme slippage for any exit
78.4% sell pressure with 3.5:1 seller-to-buyer ratio
Holder count collapsed -66% in 24h (-581 holders)
Snipers already extracted 100–376% profits — smart money has exited
Token was dormant for 30 days before pump — no organic community
Unverified contract, unknown authorities, no social links, no description
Top 100 holders control 83.26% of supply — extreme concentration

Mitigating factors

Token marked 'mutable: false' reducing metadata manipulation risk
Not flagged as possible spam by data provider
1h holder count increased +12, suggesting some speculative interest at lows
Candle [1] shows slight recovery from low ($0.0000282) to close ($0.0000318)
PumpSwap listing provides some baseline trading infrastructure

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced traders with very high risk tolerance who are comfortable with near-total loss of capital. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone deploying meaningful capital. Given the pump-and-dump characteristics, even short-term speculation carries extreme risk.

goblintown (GOBLINTOWN) exhibits all the hallmarks of a coordinated pump-and-dump: 30 days of dormancy, a single-day price surge of ~10x, followed by a ~90% collapse within hours. Snipers extracted 100–376% profits, holders fled en masse (-66% in 24h), and liquidity is critically thin at $16,050. There is no fundamental value proposition — no description, no social links, no verified contract. The investment thesis is overwhelmingly bearish, with only speculative meme-driven scenarios offering any upside.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

A new coordinated social media campaign or influencer promotion triggers a second pump wave, temporarily driving price back toward the $0.000050–$0.000138 resistance zone.

Viral social media momentum on X/Twitter or Telegram
Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all tokens
New whale accumulation at depressed prices creating a squeeze

Base Case

The token stabilizes at a very low price ($0.000015–$0.000030) with minimal trading activity, effectively becoming a zombie token with a small residual holder base of 400–600 addresses who either forgot about it or are holding at a loss.

Selling pressure gradually exhausts as most motivated sellers have already exited
No new catalysts emerge to drive either recovery or further collapse
Liquidity pool retains minimal funds to support occasional small trades
Holder count stabilizes around 400–600 (similar to the pre-pump baseline of 461)

Bear Case

High probability

Continued selling pressure from remaining holders and any residual sniper positions drives the price toward near-zero ($0.000001–$0.000010), with liquidity fully drained and the token becoming effectively untradeable.

Ongoing 78.4% sell pressure with no sign of reversal
Liquidity pool near depletion at $16,050
No fundamental value or community to support price
Remaining whale holders (positions 2–20) exiting their 0.95%–2.86% positions

Analysis details

Generated

May 3, 07:19 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-03 07:19 UTC

Model confidence

Medium

Data sources

On-chain Solana token metadata (mint: DJ15QJxVPFGv6kYhT6LvDGqG9b4aBFWQzavA7dGxpump)
PumpSwap DEX trading analytics (pair: GjJxdHcyd5NyMWryA7MfJwZyuYCwN19AUzQtmPnDSXWo)
Hourly OHLC candle data (24 candles, May 2–3 2026)
Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
Top 20 holder distribution data
Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks, 20 snipers identified)

Limitations

Sniper balance data is missing ('unknown') for all 20 snipers, preventing precise sniper supply concentration calculation — estimated at <2% based on sell amounts
Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed due to unverified contract and unknown update authority
Total sniped USD and transaction counts are unknown, limiting full sniper impact assessment
Historical holder data only goes back 30 days and shows zero change for 28 of those days, limiting trend analysis
No social media or community data available to assess sentiment or upcoming catalysts
FDV figures differ slightly between metadata ($31,763.51) and trading analytics ($30,640) — likely due to price movement between data pulls

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total capital loss. The data presented reflects a specific point in time and market conditions can change rapidly. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is goblintown a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell goblintown?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is goblintown ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 874 addresses (2026-05-03 07:19 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling goblintown?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is goblintown liquidity falling?

As of 2026-05-03 07:19 UTC, reported liquidity was $16,051.82. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for goblintown (goblintown)?

Is goblintown a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced traders with very high risk tolerance who are comfortable with near-total loss of capital. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone deploying meaningful capital. Given the pump-and-dump characteristics, even short-term speculation carries extreme risk.

What are the key risks of holding goblintown?

90%+ price collapse in 24h with continued downward momentum • Ultra-thin liquidity ($16,050) creating extreme slippage for any exit • 78.4% sell pressure with 3.5:1 seller-to-buyer ratio