DEGX

Degxifi Price Today & AI Analysis

DEGXSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 19, 2026

Price

$0.000103

-0.18% 24h · FDV $103,294

Contract

Live
DHTSie9phDCpRZYV229bNk8b9hvs9PUZT4nW47Kyjupx

Chain

Solana

Holders

534

Market cap

$103,294

More tokens on Solana

TURTLEBOSSTURTLEBOSSturtleboss$0.054400+1.4%MC $4.3KCASHCASHMake it Rain$0.058784-2.3%MC $8.8KMythosMythosClaude Mythos$0.043705+3.1%MC $22.6KBitBoyBitBoyThe White Bull$0.000100+3.1%MC $100.2KXingxingXingxing星星$0.041063+2.6%MC $10.5KPAIDPAIDPaid$0.0211+77.2%MC $20.39M
Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about DEGX

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Jun 19, 03:17 PM UTC

FDV

$244,404

Liquidity

$196,988

Holders

441

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Degxifi (DEGX) is a Solana-based token (mint: DHTSie9phDCpRZYV229bNk8b9hvs9PUZT4nW47Kyjupx) with a total supply of 1,000,000,000 tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$244K. The token's update authority is the system program (11111111111111111111111111111111), indicating mutable authority has been renounced. However, the data presents several severe anomalies: the historical holder series shows a flat 9 holders for the entire 30-day lookback period, yet the current holder count is reported as 441 with +432 added in the last hour — a near-instantaneous 4,800% spike that is highly suspicious. Top holder data is unavailable, supply concentration metrics show 0% for top 10 and top 100, and no sniper data exists. The price dropped -17.6% in 24h despite net buy pressure of 57.3%. These data inconsistencies raise significant red flags about data integrity and potential manipulation.

Key points

  • Update authority renounced to system program — mint and freeze authority risk is low
  • Massive suspicious holder spike: +432 holders in 1 hour after 30 days of flat 9 holders
  • High 24h trading volume (~$397K) relative to tiny FDV (~$244K) — volume/FDV ratio >1.6x is anomalous
  • Top holder data entirely unavailable — concentration risk cannot be assessed
  • Price fell -17.6% in 24h despite majority buy pressure (57.3%), suggesting sell-side dominance from large holders not captured in analytics

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24–72 hours

bearish

The token has already shed -17.6% in 24h, closing at $0.000244 from an open of $0.000424. The most recent candle (15:00 UTC) shows a large bearish engulfing pattern with a close near the session low ($0.000234 low vs $0.000244 close), indicating continued selling pressure. With no visible support structure and suspicious holder activity, further downside is likely in the near term.

Target low

$0.000150

Target high

$0.000320

Support

$0.000234 (recent candle low), $0.000150 (estimated psychological floor)

Resistance

$0.000424 (candle [1] open), $0.000511 (candle [2] high — recent peak)

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

bearish

The 30-day holder history was flat at 9 holders until a suspicious spike today. Without organic community growth, verified utility, or social traction, medium-term price appreciation is unlikely. The FDV of ~$244K is small but the lack of transparent holder data and the anomalous volume/holder dynamics make sustained upside improbable.

Catalysts

  • Genuine community adoption and organic holder growth beyond the suspicious spike
  • Listing on a centralized exchange or major DEX aggregator
  • Clarification of the holder data anomaly and transparent on-chain activity

Bullish factors

  • 57.3% buy pressure in 24h ($227.93K buys vs $169.88K sells)
  • Update authority renounced — no rug via mint or freeze
  • Liquidity of ~$197K provides some depth relative to FDV
  • 2,471 buy transactions vs 1,699 sell transactions in 24h

Bearish factors

  • Price fell -17.6% despite net buy pressure — suggests large hidden sellers
  • 30 days of flat 9 holders followed by suspicious +432 spike in 1 hour
  • No top holder data available — concentration risk unknown
  • No project description, unverified contract
  • Volume/FDV ratio >1.6x is anomalous and may indicate wash trading
  • Price % change shown as 0% across all timeframes (5m, 1h, 6h, 24h) contradicts the -17.6% 24h figure — data inconsistency

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) missing top holder data making it impossible to assess true sell pressure sources, (2) the suspicious +432 holder spike in 1 hour after 30 days of stagnation suggesting data manipulation or bot activity, (3) only 2 OHLC candles available for technical analysis, and (4) no sniper data to assess early buyer behavior.

DEGX call history

Full track record →

Jun 19bearish
24h+3.5%
7d-13.6%
30d-49.7%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
DHTSie...jupx
Total Supply
1,000,000,000 DEGX

Key Risks

  • Suspicious +432 holder spike in 1 hour after 30 days of flat 9 holders — possible bot activity or data manipulation
  • Top holder data entirely unavailable — cannot assess true concentration or dump risk
  • Price fell -17.6% despite 57.3% buy pressure — implies large hidden sellers distributing
  • Single liquidity pool with ~$197K depth — fragile and subject to sudden withdrawal

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidenceLow risk

No sniper data is available for DEGX. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper analysis. The suspicious +432 holder spike in a single hour (after 30 days of flat 9 holders) could indicate bot-driven wallet creation or coordinated activity rather than genuine smart money accumulation. The price decline of -17.6% despite net buy pressure suggests that early or large holders may be distributing into buy-side liquidity.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration
0.00%
PnL state
Unknown
Sell-through rate
Unknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available — endpoint returned no results.

Unknown — no sniper data available. The anomalous holder spike and price decline despite buy pressure suggest early holders may be selling into demand, but this cannot be confirmed without top holder or sniper data.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (14:00 UTC): O=$0.000313, H=$0.000511, L=$0.000294, C=$0.000464 — a bullish candle with a strong upper wick suggesting rejection near $0.000511. Candle [1] (15:00 UTC): O=$0.000424, H=$0.000487, L=$0.000234, C=$0.000244 — a large bearish engulfing candle that opened above the prior close, reached a lower high ($0.000487 vs $0.000511), and closed near the session low. This is a strongly bearish signal. The price action shows a failed attempt to hold gains from candle [2], with candle [1] erasing most of the prior move.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

The two available candles show a clear short-term downtrend: a lower high ($0.000487 vs $0.000511) and a sharp close near the session low ($0.000244). The 30-day holder stagnation and -17.6% 24h price decline confirm a medium-term downtrend as well.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

57%

Sell

43%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000234 (candle [1] low)

Major support

$0.000150 (estimated psychological level below recent lows)

Immediate resistance

$0.000424 (candle [1] open / prior session level)

Major resistance

$0.000511 (candle [2] high — recent peak)

The immediate support at $0.000234 is the only confirmed on-chain low from available data. A break below this level would open the door to further downside with no visible support. Resistance at $0.000424 (candle [1] open) and $0.000511 (candle [2] high) are the key levels bulls must reclaim.

Notable patterns

  • Bearish engulfing candle at candle [1] — strong sell signal
  • Lower high formation ($0.000487 vs $0.000511) — downtrend confirmation
  • Close near session low in candle [1] — bearish momentum continuation
  • Upper wick rejection in candle [2] at $0.000511 — resistance confirmed
  • Volume declining alongside price drop — weakening buy-side conviction

Holder growth

Total holders

441

24h Δ

+432

7d Δ

+432

30d Δ

+432

Accelerating Growth

Yes

Correlation with price

The +432 holder spike occurred simultaneously with a -17.6% price decline, suggesting the holder growth is NOT correlated with positive price action. This is a strong anomaly — typically, rapid holder growth accompanies price appreciation. The inverse relationship here raises concerns about the authenticity of the holder spike (possible bot wallets, airdrop farming, or data reporting error).

The historical holder data shows an absolutely flat 9 holders per day for the entire 30-day lookback period (May 20 – June 18, 2026), with zero net change on every single day. Then, in the most recent 1-hour window, 432 new holders appeared — a 4,800% spike. This is statistically implausible for organic growth and is a major red flag. Possible explanations include: (1) a mass airdrop or token distribution event not captured in the airdrop acquisition metric (which shows 0 airdrops), (2) bot wallet creation, (3) a data reporting anomaly or API lag. The acquisition breakdown shows 436 holders acquired via swap and 5 via transfer, which partially explains the mechanism but not the timing. Investors should treat this holder count with extreme skepticism.

Concentration

Top 10 hold

0.00%

Top 100 hold

0.00%

Sentiment

Mixed

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for DEGX — the API returned no top 20 holders. Supply concentration metrics report 0% for both top 10 and top 100, which is almost certainly a data artifact rather than a genuine reflection of perfectly even distribution across 441 holders. A 1B token supply with $197K liquidity and $244K FDV almost certainly has significant concentration among early holders or the deployer. The absence of this data is itself a risk signal — it prevents proper assessment of dump risk from large holders. The distribution is classified as 'very_concentrated' as a conservative assumption given the data gap and the price declining despite net buy pressure (consistent with a large holder selling).

Notable holders

  • No top holder data availableN/A0.00%

Liquidity

Liquidity

$196,990

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of ~$197K on a single Meteora DLMM pool (9bcCDMda1SsnUsjVxxKu5XKoKiQmVd7oCVuib9BwC4DL) is shallow relative to the 24h trading volume of ~$397.8K — a volume-to-liquidity ratio of ~2x, indicating the pool is being heavily utilized and slippage risk is high for larger trades. The FDV of ~$244K is only marginally above the liquidity pool value (~$197K), which is unusual and suggests the market cap is almost entirely backed by the liquidity pool itself with minimal premium. Net flow is technically inflow (57.3% buy pressure, 870 unique buyers vs 648 unique sellers), yet price fell -17.6% — this divergence strongly implies that sell-side transactions are larger in average size than buy-side transactions, consistent with whale distribution into retail buying. The single-pool structure also means liquidity is fragile and could be withdrawn at any time.

Flow (24h)

Buy volume

$227,930

Sell volume

$169,880

Net flow

Inflow

Unique buyers

870

Unique sellers

648

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1,000,000,000 DEGX

FDV

$244,404

Mint authority

Renounced

Freeze authority

Renounced

The update authority is set to the Solana system program (11111111111111111111111111111111), which is the canonical burn/renounced address on Solana. This means the token metadata is immutable and the mint/freeze authorities have been renounced — a positive signal that reduces rug risk from authority abuse. The token is marked as 'mutable: false' and 'master edition: false', further confirming immutability. Total supply is a round 1,000,000,000 tokens (1B), typical for meme/community tokens. The FDV of ~$244K is very small. No description is provided, and the contract is unverified, which are negative signals. The token has social links (website, Moralis) but no on-chain description, limiting transparency about the project's purpose.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price dropped -17.6% in a single 24h period. The two available candles show extreme intra-hour swings (e.g., candle [2] ranged from $0.000294 to $0.000511 — a 74% range in one hour). This level of volatility is consistent with a low-liquidity, speculative token.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Only ~$197K in liquidity on a single Meteora DLMM pool. The volume-to-liquidity ratio of ~2x in 24h means the pool is being heavily cycled. Large exits could cause severe slippage or drain the pool entirely.

  • Concentrationhigh

    Top holder data is unavailable and supply concentration metrics report 0% (likely a data error). The price declining despite net buy pressure strongly implies concentrated selling from large holders. With only 441 holders and a 1B token supply, concentration is almost certainly high.

  • Sniper Dumpmedium

    No sniper data is available, so sniper dump risk cannot be directly quantified. However, the suspicious +432 holder spike in 1 hour and price decline despite buy pressure are consistent with early holder distribution. Risk is elevated to medium as a conservative estimate.

  • Authoritylow

    Update authority is renounced to the system program (11111111111111111111111111111111). Token is immutable (mutable: false). Mint and freeze authority risks are low.

Key risks

  • Suspicious +432 holder spike in 1 hour after 30 days of flat 9 holders — possible bot activity or data manipulation
  • Top holder data entirely unavailable — cannot assess true concentration or dump risk
  • Price fell -17.6% despite 57.3% buy pressure — implies large hidden sellers distributing
  • Single liquidity pool with ~$197K depth — fragile and subject to sudden withdrawal
  • No project description, unverified contract, no on-chain utility signals
  • Volume/FDV ratio >1.6x may indicate wash trading or artificial volume inflation
  • Price % change shown as 0% across all timeframes contradicts the -17.6% 24h figure — data integrity concern

Mitigating factors

  • Update authority renounced to system program — no mint/freeze rug risk
  • Token marked immutable (mutable: false)
  • Net buy pressure of 57.3% with 870 unique buyers shows some genuine demand
  • Liquidity of ~$197K provides some exit depth for small positions
  • Social links present (website, Moralis)

Suitable for

DEGX is suitable ONLY for highly risk-tolerant, experienced traders who understand the extreme risks of micro-cap Solana tokens. The combination of suspicious holder data, unavailable concentration metrics, price decline despite buy pressure, and a single shallow liquidity pool makes this unsuitable for conservative or moderate-risk investors. Any position should be considered highly speculative with a realistic probability of total loss.

DEGX is a micro-cap Solana token with a renounced update authority and ~$197K in liquidity, but it exhibits multiple severe red flags: a suspicious 4,800% holder spike in 1 hour after 30 days of stagnation, unavailable top holder data, price decline despite net buy pressure, and no project description or verified contract. The risk/reward profile is extremely unfavorable for most investors.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If the holder spike represents genuine new community adoption (e.g., a viral social media moment or influencer promotion), and the buy pressure (57.3%) sustains, the token could recover toward the $0.000424–$0.000511 resistance zone, representing a 73–109% gain from current levels. The renounced authority reduces rug risk from the team side.

  • Sustained organic holder growth beyond the initial spike
  • Buy pressure maintaining above 55% with increasing average transaction size
  • Liquidity pool deepening beyond $197K
  • Transparent project communication and verified contract

Base Case

The token stabilizes in the $0.000150–$0.000300 range with low trading activity as initial hype fades. Holder count stabilizes around 400–500 with minimal new organic growth. The token remains a speculative micro-cap with no clear utility or community traction.

  • Liquidity pool remains intact at current levels
  • No major new catalysts (positive or negative) emerge
  • Holder growth normalizes to single digits per day
  • Price consolidates near recent lows without a major breakdown or breakout

Bear Case

High probability

The suspicious holder spike is bot-driven or a data artifact, large early holders continue distributing into retail buy pressure, and the price breaks below the $0.000234 support level. With no visible floor and shallow liquidity, the token could lose 50–80% of current value, approaching $0.000050–$0.000120.

  • Concentrated holder(s) continuing to sell into buy pressure
  • Liquidity pool withdrawal by LP providers
  • Holder spike revealed as inorganic (bots/wash trading)
  • No fundamental catalyst to sustain demand

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 19, 03:17 PM UTC

Data freshness

Price and OHLC data current as of 2026-06-19T15:00:00.000Z (most recent hourly candle). Historical holder data through 2026-06-18T00:00:00.000Z. Sniper data unavailable.

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Moralis Solana Token API (metadata, price, OHLC, trading analytics, holder metrics, historical holders)
  • Meteora DLMM pool data (pair: 9bcCDMda1SsnUsjVxxKu5XKoKiQmVd7oCVuib9BwC4DL)
  • On-chain mint metadata (update authority, mutability flags)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Top 20 holder data unavailable — concentration and whale analysis severely limited
  • Supply concentration metrics report 0% for top 10 and top 100 — likely a data error, not genuine equal distribution
  • No sniper data available — early buyer behavior and smart money signals cannot be assessed
  • Suspicious holder data anomaly (+432 in 1 hour after 30 days flat at 9) undermines holder trend analysis reliability
  • Price % change shown as 0% across all timeframes contradicts the -17.6% 24h figure — possible API data inconsistency
  • No project description or whitepaper available for fundamental analysis
  • Single liquidity pool — no cross-pool price validation possible

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. All data is sourced from third-party APIs and may contain errors or inconsistencies. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Degxifi (DEGX)?

The token has already shed -17.6% in 24h, closing at $0.000244 from an open of $0.000424. The most recent candle (15:00 UTC) shows a large bearish engulfing pattern with a close near the session low ($0.000234 low vs $0.000244 close), indicating continued selling pressure. With no visible support structure and suspicious holder activity, further downside is likely in the near term. Short-term outlook is bearish (24–72 hours), with a target range of $0.000150 to $0.000320.

Is DEGX a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very high with a risk score of 8.7/100. DEGX is suitable ONLY for highly risk-tolerant, experienced traders who understand the extreme risks of micro-cap Solana tokens. The combination of suspicious holder data, unavailable concentration metrics, price decline despite buy pressure, and a single shallow liquidity pool makes this unsuitable for conservative or moderate-risk investors. Any position should be considered highly speculative with a realistic probability of total loss.

How are DEGX holders trending?

Degxifi currently has 441 holders and is growing (24h: 432, 7d: 432, 30d: 432). The historical holder data shows an absolutely flat 9 holders per day for the entire 30-day lookback period (May 20 – June 18, 2026), with zero net change on every single day. Then, in the most recent 1-hour window, 432 new holders appeared — a 4,800% spike. This is statistically implausible for organic growth and is a major red flag. Possible explanations include: (1) a mass airdrop or token distribution event not captured in the airdrop acquisition metric (which shows 0 airdrops), (2) bot wallet creation, (3) a data reporting anomaly or API lag. The acquisition breakdown shows 436 holders acquired via swap and 5 via transfer, which partially explains the mechanism but not the timing. Investors should treat this holder count with extreme skepticism.

What does sniper activity look like for DEGX?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding DEGX?

Suspicious +432 holder spike in 1 hour after 30 days of flat 9 holders — possible bot activity or data manipulation • Top holder data entirely unavailable — cannot assess true concentration or dump risk • Price fell -17.6% despite 57.3% buy pressure — implies large hidden sellers distributing

← Back to all predictions

Track DEGX