Degxifi Price Today & AI Analysis

DEGXSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 19, 2026

$0.0₄9460

-1.91% 24h

Contract

Live

DHTSie9phDCpRZYV229bNk8b9hvs9PUZT4nW47Kyjupx

Chain

Solana

Holders

510

Market cap

$94,605

At a $1M market cap, $DEGX would be $0.001000 (10.6x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is DEGX a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 1

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

4.9%15 insiders still holding

Creator holds

0.71%

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about DEGX

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

HOOKIHOOKI$0.0₄1526+3.9%MC $15.1K

AQCaqc$0.000104-4.2%MC $102.1K

AUCAudaCity$0.0₄1004-16.5%MC $9.8K

MAXISAxis$0.000143-5.4%MC $142.9K

PeaceWorld Peace$0.0₄3329+0.3%MC $33.1K

ANAKINAnakin Coin$0.000276+308.4%MC $274.6K

Degxifi: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-19 15:17 UTC

Holder addresses

441

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$196,988.33

How concentrated is Degxifi ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 441 addresses (2026-06-19 15:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Degxifi?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Degxifi liquidity falling?: As of 2026-06-19 15:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $196,988.33. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-19 15:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jun 19, 03:17 PM UTC

FDV

$244,404

Liquidity

$196,988.33

Holders

441

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Degxifi (DEGX) is a Solana-based token (mint: DHTSie9phDCpRZYV229bNk8b9hvs9PUZT4nW47Kyjupx) with a total supply of 1,000,000,000 tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$244K. The token's update authority is the system program (11111111111111111111111111111111), indicating mutable authority has been renounced. However, the data presents several severe anomalies: the historical holder series shows a flat 9 holders for the entire 30-day lookback period, yet the current holder count is reported as 441 with +432 added in the last hour — a near-instantaneous 4,800% spike that is highly suspicious. Top holder data is unavailable, supply concentration metrics show 0% for top 10 and top 100, and no sniper data exists. The price dropped -17.6% in 24h despite net buy pressure of 57.3%. These data inconsistencies raise significant red flags about data integrity and potential manipulation.

Key points

Update authority renounced to system program — mint and freeze authority risk is low
Massive suspicious holder spike: +432 holders in 1 hour after 30 days of flat 9 holders
High 24h trading volume (~$397K) relative to tiny FDV (~$244K) — volume/FDV ratio >1.6x is anomalous
Top holder data entirely unavailable — concentration risk cannot be assessed
Price fell -17.6% in 24h despite majority buy pressure (57.3%), suggesting sell-side dominance from large holders not captured in analytics

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24–72 hours

bearish

The token has already shed -17.6% in 24h, closing at $0.000244 from an open of $0.000424. The most recent candle (15:00 UTC) shows a large bearish engulfing pattern with a close near the session low ($0.000234 low vs $0.000244 close), indicating continued selling pressure. With no visible support structure and suspicious holder activity, further downside is likely in the near term.

Target low

$0.000150

Target high

$0.000320

Support: $0.000234 (recent candle low), $0.000150 (estimated psychological floor)
Resistance: $0.000424 (candle [1] open), $0.000511 (candle [2] high — recent peak)

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

bearish

The 30-day holder history was flat at 9 holders until a suspicious spike today. Without organic community growth, verified utility, or social traction, medium-term price appreciation is unlikely. The FDV of ~$244K is small but the lack of transparent holder data and the anomalous volume/holder dynamics make sustained upside improbable.

Catalysts

Genuine community adoption and organic holder growth beyond the suspicious spike
Listing on a centralized exchange or major DEX aggregator
Clarification of the holder data anomaly and transparent on-chain activity

Bullish factors

57.3% buy pressure in 24h ($227.93K buys vs $169.88K sells)
Update authority renounced — no rug via mint or freeze
Liquidity of ~$197K provides some depth relative to FDV
2,471 buy transactions vs 1,699 sell transactions in 24h

Bearish factors

Price fell -17.6% despite net buy pressure — suggests large hidden sellers
30 days of flat 9 holders followed by suspicious +432 spike in 1 hour
No top holder data available — concentration risk unknown
No project description, unverified contract
Volume/FDV ratio >1.6x is anomalous and may indicate wash trading
Price % change shown as 0% across all timeframes (5m, 1h, 6h, 24h) contradicts the -17.6% 24h figure — data inconsistency

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) missing top holder data making it impossible to assess true sell pressure sources, (2) the suspicious +432 holder spike in 1 hour after 30 days of stagnation suggesting data manipulation or bot activity, (3) only 2 OHLC candles available for technical analysis, and (4) no sniper data to assess early buyer behavior.

DEGX call history

Full track record →

Jun 19bearish@ $0.000244

24h+3.5%

7d-13.6%

30d-49.7%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: DHTSie...jupx
Total Supply: 1,000,000,000 DEGX

Key Risks

Suspicious +432 holder spike in 1 hour after 30 days of flat 9 holders — possible bot activity or data manipulation
Top holder data entirely unavailable — cannot assess true concentration or dump risk
Price fell -17.6% despite 57.3% buy pressure — implies large hidden sellers distributing
Single liquidity pool with ~$197K depth — fragile and subject to sudden withdrawal

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (14:00 UTC): O=$0.000313, H=$0.000511, L=$0.000294, C=$0.000464 — a bullish candle with a strong upper wick suggesting rejection near $0.000511. Candle [1] (15:00 UTC): O=$0.000424, H=$0.000487, L=$0.000234, C=$0.000244 — a large bearish engulfing candle that opened above the prior close, reached a lower high ($0.000487 vs $0.000511), and closed near the session low. This is a strongly bearish signal. The price action shows a failed attempt to hold gains from candle [2], with candle [1] erasing most of the prior move.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

The two available candles show a clear short-term downtrend: a lower high ($0.000487 vs $0.000511) and a sharp close near the session low ($0.000244). The 30-day holder stagnation and -17.6% 24h price decline confirm a medium-term downtrend as well.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

57%

Sell

43%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000234 (candle [1] low)

Major support

$0.000150 (estimated psychological level below recent lows)

Immediate resistance

$0.000424 (candle [1] open / prior session level)

Major resistance

$0.000511 (candle [2] high — recent peak)

The immediate support at $0.000234 is the only confirmed on-chain low from available data. A break below this level would open the door to further downside with no visible support. Resistance at $0.000424 (candle [1] open) and $0.000511 (candle [2] high) are the key levels bulls must reclaim.

Notable patterns

Bearish engulfing candle at candle [1] — strong sell signal
Lower high formation ($0.000487 vs $0.000511) — downtrend confirmation
Close near session low in candle [1] — bearish momentum continuation
Upper wick rejection in candle [2] at $0.000511 — resistance confirmed
Volume declining alongside price drop — weakening buy-side conviction

Liquidity

$196,988.33

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of ~$197K on a single Meteora DLMM pool (9bcCDMda1SsnUsjVxxKu5XKoKiQmVd7oCVuib9BwC4DL) is shallow relative to the 24h trading volume of ~$397.8K — a volume-to-liquidity ratio of ~2x, indicating the pool is being heavily utilized and slippage risk is high for larger trades. The FDV of ~$244K is only marginally above the liquidity pool value (~$197K), which is unusual and suggests the market cap is almost entirely backed by the liquidity pool itself with minimal premium. Net flow is technically inflow (57.3% buy pressure, 870 unique buyers vs 648 unique sellers), yet price fell -17.6% — this divergence strongly implies that sell-side transactions are larger in average size than buy-side transactions, consistent with whale distribution into retail buying. The single-pool structure also means liquidity is fragile and could be withdrawn at any time.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1,000,000,000 DEGX

FDV

$244,404

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price dropped -17.6% in a single 24h period. The two available candles show extreme intra-hour swings (e.g., candle [2] ranged from $0.000294 to $0.000511 — a 74% range in one hour). This level of volatility is consistent with a low-liquidity, speculative token.
Liquidityhigh
Only ~$197K in liquidity on a single Meteora DLMM pool. The volume-to-liquidity ratio of ~2x in 24h means the pool is being heavily cycled. Large exits could cause severe slippage or drain the pool entirely.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Suspicious +432 holder spike in 1 hour after 30 days of flat 9 holders — possible bot activity or data manipulation
Top holder data entirely unavailable — cannot assess true concentration or dump risk
Price fell -17.6% despite 57.3% buy pressure — implies large hidden sellers distributing
Single liquidity pool with ~$197K depth — fragile and subject to sudden withdrawal
No project description, unverified contract, no on-chain utility signals
Volume/FDV ratio >1.6x may indicate wash trading or artificial volume inflation
Price % change shown as 0% across all timeframes contradicts the -17.6% 24h figure — data integrity concern

Mitigating factors

Update authority renounced to system program — no mint/freeze rug risk
Token marked immutable (mutable: false)
Net buy pressure of 57.3% with 870 unique buyers shows some genuine demand
Liquidity of ~$197K provides some exit depth for small positions
Social links present (website, Moralis)

Suitable for

DEGX is suitable ONLY for highly risk-tolerant, experienced traders who understand the extreme risks of micro-cap Solana tokens. The combination of suspicious holder data, unavailable concentration metrics, price decline despite buy pressure, and a single shallow liquidity pool makes this unsuitable for conservative or moderate-risk investors. Any position should be considered highly speculative with a realistic probability of total loss.

DEGX is a micro-cap Solana token with a renounced update authority and ~$197K in liquidity, but it exhibits multiple severe red flags: a suspicious 4,800% holder spike in 1 hour after 30 days of stagnation, unavailable top holder data, price decline despite net buy pressure, and no project description or verified contract. The risk/reward profile is extremely unfavorable for most investors.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If the holder spike represents genuine new community adoption (e.g., a viral social media moment or influencer promotion), and the buy pressure (57.3%) sustains, the token could recover toward the $0.000424–$0.000511 resistance zone, representing a 73–109% gain from current levels. The renounced authority reduces rug risk from the team side.

Sustained organic holder growth beyond the initial spike
Buy pressure maintaining above 55% with increasing average transaction size
Liquidity pool deepening beyond $197K
Transparent project communication and verified contract

Base Case

The token stabilizes in the $0.000150–$0.000300 range with low trading activity as initial hype fades. Holder count stabilizes around 400–500 with minimal new organic growth. The token remains a speculative micro-cap with no clear utility or community traction.

Liquidity pool remains intact at current levels
No major new catalysts (positive or negative) emerge
Holder growth normalizes to single digits per day
Price consolidates near recent lows without a major breakdown or breakout

Bear Case

High probability

The suspicious holder spike is bot-driven or a data artifact, large early holders continue distributing into retail buy pressure, and the price breaks below the $0.000234 support level. With no visible floor and shallow liquidity, the token could lose 50–80% of current value, approaching $0.000050–$0.000120.

Concentrated holder(s) continuing to sell into buy pressure
Liquidity pool withdrawal by LP providers
Holder spike revealed as inorganic (bots/wash trading)
No fundamental catalyst to sustain demand

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 19, 03:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-19 15:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

Moralis Solana Token API (metadata, price, OHLC, trading analytics, holder metrics, historical holders)
Meteora DLMM pool data (pair: 9bcCDMda1SsnUsjVxxKu5XKoKiQmVd7oCVuib9BwC4DL)
On-chain mint metadata (update authority, mutability flags)

Limitations

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
Top 20 holder data unavailable — concentration and whale analysis severely limited
Supply concentration metrics report 0% for top 10 and top 100 — likely a data error, not genuine equal distribution
No sniper data available — early buyer behavior and smart money signals cannot be assessed
Suspicious holder data anomaly (+432 in 1 hour after 30 days flat at 9) undermines holder trend analysis reliability
Price % change shown as 0% across all timeframes contradicts the -17.6% 24h figure — possible API data inconsistency
No project description or whitepaper available for fundamental analysis
Single liquidity pool — no cross-pool price validation possible

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. All data is sourced from third-party APIs and may contain errors or inconsistencies. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Degxifi (DEGX) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Nov 1, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Degxifi (DEGX)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 1, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Degxifi ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 441 addresses (2026-06-19 15:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Degxifi?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Degxifi liquidity falling?

As of 2026-06-19 15:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $196,988.33. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Degxifi (DEGX)?

Is DEGX a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 8.7/100. DEGX is suitable ONLY for highly risk-tolerant, experienced traders who understand the extreme risks of micro-cap Solana tokens. The combination of suspicious holder data, unavailable concentration metrics, price decline despite buy pressure, and a single shallow liquidity pool makes this unsuitable for conservative or moderate-risk investors. Any position should be considered highly speculative with a realistic probability of total loss.

What are the key risks of holding DEGX?

Suspicious +432 holder spike in 1 hour after 30 days of flat 9 holders — possible bot activity or data manipulation • Top holder data entirely unavailable — cannot assess true concentration or dump risk • Price fell -17.6% despite 57.3% buy pressure — implies large hidden sellers distributing