sPL.001

First Life on Mars Price Today & AI Analysis

sPL.001SolanaAnalysis as of Sep 22, 2026

Price

$0.000134

+172.22% 24h · FDV $122,440

Contract

Live
DFmkM8ZhfvkuzWz5gyMEkH2ocLP7qxyCaSme9TYqGczN

Chain

Solana

Holders

982

Market cap

$122,440

More tokens on Solana

BonkBonkBonk$0.053435+4.1%MC $302.22MGHOSTCATGHOSTCATAave Ghost Cat$0.000643+1120.4%MC $642.7KRAYCATRAYCATRaydium Cat$0.006458+59.1%MC $6.22MBOTIFYBOTIFYBotify$0.000800+45032.2%MC $799.7KxSOLxSOLxSOL$0.0873+17.8%MC $14.57MANTFUNANTFUNAntFun$0.009311-88.3%MC $82.61M

First Life on Mars: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-22 19:15 UTC

Holder addresses

982

Top 10 supply share

34.29%

Reported liquidity

$17,600.00
How concentrated is First Life on Mars ownership?
As of 2026-09-22 19:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 34.29% of supply. It reports 982 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling First Life on Mars?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-22 19:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $608,130.00 in buys and $595,348.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is First Life on Mars liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed -26.43%, from $23,929.13 (2026-09-22 17:00 UTC) to $17,605.69 (2026-09-22 19:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-22 19:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-22 17:00 UTC$23,929.13
2026-09-22 18:00 UTC$23,607.14
2026-09-22 19:00 UTC$17,605.69

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about sPL.001

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 22, 07:16 PM UTC

FDV

$122,440

Liquidity

$17,600.00

Holders

982

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

First Life on Mars (sPL.001) is a very small, newly active Solana token trading on PumpSwap with a fully diluted valuation of roughly $122.4K and only $17.6K in total liquidity. The token has experienced extreme volatility — an intra-hour range spanning roughly 100x from low to high — and is currently in a sharp pullback after a reported +172% 24h move, with 5m and 1h changes both around -41% to -43%. Holder data shows 982 addresses with the top 10 controlling 34.29% of supply, but no historical holder trend, wallet classification, or sniper data is available to assess distribution dynamics further. Mint/freeze authority status and contract verification are all unknown.

Key points

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($17.6K) relative to FDV ($122.4K), making it highly susceptible to slippage and price manipulation
  • Very fresh/early-stage trading profile evidenced by 100x intra-hour candle ranges
  • Near-balanced buy/sell volume (50.5%/49.5%) despite a sharp recent price drawdown, suggesting active two-sided trading rather than a one-sided panic dump
  • Multiple critical data gaps: unknown mint/freeze authority, unknown sniper activity, and no holder history

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

The most recent hourly candles show a clear breakdown from the intraday high (~$0.000491) down to $0.0001337, with 5m (-43.2%) and 1h (-41.2%) changes both sharply negative. This indicates the token is currently unwinding a rapid pump and is in a high-momentum downtrend in the immediate term, though shallow liquidity means sharp bounces are also possible.

Target low

$0.00007

Target high

$0.00020

Support

$0.0000985 (candle 2 low), $0.0000450 (candle 1 open/low)

Resistance

$0.000260 (candle 1 close / recent pivot), $0.000491 (candle 2 high, recent peak)

Medium term · 3-7 days

neutral

With only three hourly candles of data and no multi-day trend history, a confident medium-term directional call cannot be made. The token's fate will likely hinge on whether liquidity deepens and holder concentration decreases, or whether early holders/top-10 wallets (34.29% of supply) begin distributing into any strength.

Catalysts

  • Whether liquidity providers add depth beyond the current $17.6K
  • Any resolution of unknown mint/freeze authority status (renouncement would reduce rug risk)
  • Continued retail interest/social momentum via the token's Twitter/website links
  • Behavior of top-10 holders (34.29% of supply) — further concentration or distribution

Bullish factors

  • 24h volume is substantial relative to FDV ($608K buy + $595K sell vs $122K FDV), showing significant trading interest
  • Buy/sell volume is nearly balanced (50.5%/49.5%), not showing overwhelming one-sided selling
  • 982 holders suggests some distribution of ownership beyond a tiny insider group

Bearish factors

  • Sharp reversal in progress: -41% (1h) and -43% (5m) declines immediately following a reported +172% 24h spike
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($17.6K) relative to FDV amplifies downside moves
  • Top-10 concentration at 34.29% with no visibility into whether these wallets are selling into strength
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority leaves open a tail risk of supply dilution or account freezing

Confidence: low. Only three hourly OHLC candles and a single-day analytics snapshot are available; there is no multi-day price history, no sniper data, and no holder trend data. This severely limits the reliability of any forward-looking price prediction, especially for a token this early-stage and volatile.

sPL.001 call history

Full track record →

Sep 22bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
DFmkM8...GczN
Total Supply
915,859,454.11

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($17.6K) relative to FDV ($122.4K) enables large price swings from modest trade sizes
  • Massive intra-hour volatility (single-hour range from ~$0.0000045 to ~$0.000491) suggests a very early, unstable price discovery phase typical of a fresh pump.fun-style launch
  • Top-10 wallets hold 34.29% of supply with no historical trend data to confirm whether concentration is increasing or decreasing
  • Mint/freeze authority status is unknown — cannot rule out ability to mint new supply or freeze accounts

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only three hourly candles are available (2026-09-22 17:00–19:00 UTC). Candle 1 opened at $0.0000045, spiked to a high of $0.000436, then closed at $0.000261 — a massive wick suggesting a rapid pump followed by partial rejection. Candle 2 opened at the prior close ($0.000261), pushed to a new high of $0.000491 (the sequence's peak), but fell back to close at $0.000242, printing a long upper wick / shooting-star-like pattern indicating rejection of higher prices. Candle 3 opened at $0.000242, traded in a much tighter range (high $0.000258, low $0.0000985), and closed lower at $0.0001337 on sharply reduced volume ($49.8K vs $692K and $542K in prior candles) — a strong bearish signal showing both declining price and declining participation.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term price action over the last three hours shows a clear downtrend: each candle's close is lower than the previous, and the most recent candle shows a materially lower high and lower volume. Medium-term trend cannot be reliably assessed given only 3 hourly candles, so it is characterized as sideways/undetermined pending more data.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000985 (candle 2 low, tested in candle 3)

Major support

$0.0000045 (candle 1 open, the sequence's absolute low)

Immediate resistance

$0.000258-$0.000261 (candle 1 close / candle 3 high)

Major resistance

$0.000491 (candle 2 high, the sequence's absolute peak)

The token is currently trading ($0.0001337) between its immediate support (~$0.0000985) and immediate resistance (~$0.000258-0.000261). A break below $0.0000985 would open the door toward the major support near the candle-1 open, while reclaiming $0.000258-0.000261 would be needed to challenge the $0.000491 peak.

Notable patterns

  • Long upper-wick 'shooting star'-like candle in hour 2, signaling rejection at highs
  • Sharp volume decay across three consecutive candles (~93% decline), a bearish momentum signal
  • Lower highs and lower closes across all three candles, forming a short-term downtrend structure

Liquidity

Liquidity

$17,600.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $17.60K is very shallow relative to a fully diluted valuation of $122.44K, meaning trades of even modest size can cause outsized price impact — consistent with the observed intra-hour price swings from $0.0000045 to $0.000491. 24h buy volume ($608.13K) and sell volume ($595.35K) are nearly balanced (50.5%/49.5% split), with more unique buyers (3,448) than sellers (2,965), suggesting healthy two-sided participation in raw trade count even though the token's price has recently fallen sharply. This combination of high turnover against thin liquidity is a hallmark of a high-risk, high-volatility micro-cap trading environment.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

915,859,454.11

FDV

$122.44K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price moved from open ~$0.0000045 to intraday highs of ~$0.000491 within the same hour candle, then collapsed back toward $0.0001337. 5m change -43.2% and 1h change -41.2% show extreme, ongoing volatility even as 24h change shows +172.2%. This is characteristic of an early-stage, thinly-traded pump.fun/PumpSwap launch.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $17.60K against a fully diluted valuation of ~$122.44K. That is a very shallow liquidity base relative to FDV, meaning even moderate-sized trades can move price dramatically, consistent with the huge intra-hour candle ranges observed.

  • Concentrationhigh

    Top-10 holders control 34.29% of total supply across 982 holder addresses. This is a meaningful concentration for a token this young; no historical holder trend or wallet classification data is available to assess whether this is improving or worsening.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($17.6K) relative to FDV ($122.4K) enables large price swings from modest trade sizes
  • Massive intra-hour volatility (single-hour range from ~$0.0000045 to ~$0.000491) suggests a very early, unstable price discovery phase typical of a fresh pump.fun-style launch
  • Top-10 wallets hold 34.29% of supply with no historical trend data to confirm whether concentration is increasing or decreasing
  • Mint/freeze authority status is unknown — cannot rule out ability to mint new supply or freeze accounts
  • No sniper-wallet data available, so early-buyer dumping risk cannot be assessed and should not be assumed benign
  • Description field references third-party fee routing ('Fees to @pioneer__labs via UsePaid'), an unverifiable claim embedded in adversarial metadata
  • 24h price change of +172% alongside a -41% 1h and -43% 5m move indicates the token is currently in a sharp reversal/dump phase

Mitigating factors

  • Reasonably active 24h trading with 8,742 buys vs 6,783 sells and near-balanced 50.5%/49.5% buy/sell volume split, indicating two-sided market participation rather than one-directional dumping
  • 982 distinct holder addresses suggests some organic distribution rather than a handful of wallets holding all supply
  • Token trades on an established venue (PumpSwap) with visible OHLC and volume data, allowing at least partial transparency

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital. Not suitable for investors seeking capital preservation, income, or moderate risk exposure given the shallow liquidity, extreme volatility, and multiple unknown authority/sniper data points.

First Life on Mars is a micro-cap, high-volatility PumpSwap-listed token with active but thin trading, meaningful top-10 concentration, and multiple unresolved data gaps around authorities and sniper activity. It exhibits classic early-stage speculative-launch characteristics: rapid pump followed by a sharp reversal, on shallow liquidity. Any position would be a short-term speculative bet, not a fundamentals-driven investment, given the near-total absence of verifiable tokenomics safeguards.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If liquidity deepens, social/community momentum (via its Twitter and website presence) continues, and no large concentrated holders dump, the token could stabilize and attempt to reclaim recent highs near $0.000258-$0.000491, especially if buy pressure (currently 50.5% of volume) increases further.

  • Continued strong buyer participation (3,448 unique buyers in 24h)
  • Liquidity providers adding depth to reduce slippage and volatility
  • Sustained near-balanced or buyer-favorable volume split
  • Positive resolution of authority unknowns (renounced mint/freeze) building trust

Base Case

The token likely continues to exhibit high volatility with wide price swings in both directions as it works through its post-pump price discovery phase, with liquidity remaining the binding constraint on price stability in the near term.

  • No major liquidity injection or removal occurs in the short term
  • Trading activity (buys/sells, unique wallets) remains roughly at current levels
  • No confirmation yet emerges on mint/freeze authority status
  • Top-10 holder behavior remains unknown but concentration stays near current 34.29% level

Bear Case

High probability

Given the -41% 1h and -43% 5m declines, sharply decaying volume across the most recent candles, and top-10 holders controlling 34.29% of supply with no visibility into their intentions, the token could continue falling toward or below its immediate support near $0.0000985, especially if any concentrated holder begins distributing into a shallow $17.6K liquidity pool.

  • Rapid volume decay (~93% drop across three hourly candles) signaling fading interest
  • Shallow liquidity amplifying any sell pressure
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaving tail risk of dilution/freezing
  • 34.29% top-10 concentration with no trend visibility into holder behavior
  • Classic pump-and-dump price shape already visible in the available candles

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 22, 07:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-22 19:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals, description)
  • USD price and 24h change data
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (3 most recent candles) from PumpSwap pair
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count, top-10 concentration)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles were available, insufficient for robust technical trend analysis beyond the immediate short term
  • No sniper wallet data was available, preventing assessment of sniper concentration, PnL, or dump risk
  • No historical holder count data (24h/7d/30d) was available, only a single current snapshot, preventing any holder growth or trend analysis
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, contract verification, and mutability status were all unknown, preventing a rug-risk determination from authorities
  • Top-100 holder concentration and wallet classification/labeling data were not provided
  • 24h $ price change and native price were both unknown, limiting cross-validation of the reported 24h % change

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from a limited, partial on-chain data snapshot and is provided for informational purposes only. It is NOT financial advice and should not be relied upon as the sole basis for any investment decision. Cryptocurrency markets, and especially micro-cap tokens like this one, are extremely volatile and carry high risk of total capital loss. Several critical data points (authority status, sniper activity, holder history) were unavailable and are explicitly marked as unknown rather than estimated. Always conduct independent due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is First Life on Mars ownership?

As of 2026-09-22 19:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 34.29% of supply. It reports 982 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling First Life on Mars?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-22 19:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $608,130.00 in buys and $595,348.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is First Life on Mars liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed -26.43%, from $23,929.13 (2026-09-22 17:00 UTC) to $17,605.69 (2026-09-22 19:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for First Life on Mars (sPL.001)?

The most recent hourly candles show a clear breakdown from the intraday high (~$0.000491) down to $0.0001337, with 5m (-43.2%) and 1h (-41.2%) changes both sharply negative. This indicates the token is currently unwinding a rapid pump and is in a high-momentum downtrend in the immediate term, though shallow liquidity means sharp bounces are also possible. Short-term outlook is bearish (1-24 hours), with a target range of $0.00007 to $0.00020.

Is sPL.001 a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital. Not suitable for investors seeking capital preservation, income, or moderate risk exposure given the shallow liquidity, extreme volatility, and multiple unknown authority/sniper data points.

What are the key risks of holding sPL.001?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($17.6K) relative to FDV ($122.4K) enables large price swings from modest trade sizes • Massive intra-hour volatility (single-hour range from ~$0.0000045 to ~$0.000491) suggests a very early, unstable price discovery phase typical of a fresh pump.fun-style launch • Top-10 wallets hold 34.29% of supply with no historical trend data to confirm whether concentration is increasing or decreasing

← Back to all predictions

Track sPL.001