GHOSTCAT

Aave Ghost Cat Price Today & AI Analysis

GHOSTCATSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 22, 2026

Price

$0.000643

+1120.42% 24h · FDV $642,656

Contract

Live
BVdbH7PLTSQxBssqvWTxVDoA8qfsztdVtMsZQSS9CScZ

Chain

Holders

1,580

Market cap

$642,656

More tokens on Solana

Aave Ghost Cat: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-22 11:45 UTC

Holder addresses

1,580

Top 10 supply share

18.80%

Reported liquidity

$37,723.00
How concentrated is Aave Ghost Cat ownership?
As of 2026-09-22 11:45 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 18.80% of supply. It reports 1,580 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Aave Ghost Cat?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-22 11:45 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $648,294.00 in buys and $606,338.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Aave Ghost Cat liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +56.82%, from $28,177.64 (2026-09-21 23:00 UTC) to $44,189.44 (2026-09-22 11:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-22 11:45 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-21 23:00 UTC$28,177.64
2026-09-22 00:00 UTC$22,469.78
2026-09-22 01:00 UTC$25,886.13
2026-09-22 02:00 UTC$23,005.08
2026-09-22 03:00 UTC$31,912.00
2026-09-22 04:00 UTC$39,313.22
2026-09-22 05:00 UTC$38,490.66
2026-09-22 06:00 UTC$38,974.14
2026-09-22 07:00 UTC$45,166.50
2026-09-22 08:00 UTC$42,373.96
2026-09-22 09:00 UTC$39,776.52
2026-09-22 10:00 UTC$45,826.98
2026-09-22 11:00 UTC$44,189.44

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about GHOSTCAT

Continue in chat

Report snapshot

as of Sep 22, 11:46 AM UTC

FDV

$642,656

Liquidity

$37,723.00

Holders

1,580

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

GHOSTCAT (Aave Ghost Cat) is a Solana token on Raydium CPMM with a ~$642.66K fully diluted valuation and only $37.72K in total liquidity. It experienced an extreme +1120% price move over the last 24 hours, spiking nearly 100x intraday before pulling back ~46% from its peak. Top-10 holders control approximately 18.8% of the 1580-address holder base, but critical data (mint/freeze authority status, sniper activity, and holder history) is unavailable, leaving major risk factors unresolved.

Key points

  • Extremely thin liquidity ($37.72K) relative to 24h trading volume (>$1.25M combined), creating high slippage risk
  • Parabolic +1120% 24h price move already showing signs of cooling with declining per-candle volume
  • Multiple critical data gaps: unknown mint/freeze authority, no sniper coverage, no holder growth history
  • Top-10 concentration of 18.8% is moderate but based on incomplete holder visibility (no top-100 or classification data)

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-48 hours

neutral

After an extreme +1120% 24h pump followed by a pullback of roughly 46% from the intraday high, the token is likely to consolidate in a wide range as buy and sell pressure remain nearly balanced (51.7% vs 48.3%). A break below immediate support could accelerate profit-taking; a reclaim of resistance could re-attract momentum buyers, but shallow liquidity ($37.72K) makes both directions prone to sharp, low-conviction swings.

Target low

$0.00043

Target high

$0.00081

Support

$0.000427, $0.0000127

Resistance

$0.000806, $0.001186

Medium term · 7-14 days

neutral

Medium-term direction is highly uncertain. Sustained gains would require continued net buy pressure and fresh liquidity inflows; absent these, tokens that spike 100x+ intraday on thin liquidity commonly retrace toward or below pre-pump levels as early buyers and unknown-status snipers/whales take profit. No holder-growth or sniper data exists to confirm durable demand.

Catalysts

  • Continued organic buyer inflow beyond the initial pump wave
  • Potential liquidity additions to the Raydium CPMM pool reducing slippage/volatility
  • Social media/twitter-driven attention cycles given the token's only listed social link is Twitter
  • Risk of large holders (top 10 hold ~18.8% of supply) exiting into any renewed strength

Bullish factors

  • 24h buy volume ($648.29K) exceeds sell volume ($606.34K), showing net positive flow
  • Buyers (3,621) outnumber sellers (2,598) in the last 24h
  • Medium-term trend remains sharply up relative to the pre-pump base
  • Twitter social presence indicates at least some organic community attention

Bearish factors

  • Price is down ~46% from the candle-6 intraday high of $0.001186, showing rejection at highs
  • Volume has declined sharply from the initial spike (400K+) to recent candles (12-25K), suggesting fading interest
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($37.72K) relative to volume creates high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Top 10 holders control ~18.8% of supply with no visibility into their behavior
  • Mint/freeze authority status unknown — cannot rule out rug/inflation risk
  • No sniper data available to assess early-buyer dumping risk

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because: (1) only 13 hourly candles are available, giving limited historical context; (2) no sniper, holder-history, or mint/freeze authority data exists to validate the sustainability of the move; (3) liquidity is extremely shallow relative to volume, meaning price action can be disproportionately swung by small trades; (4) the token shows classic pump-and-cooldown characteristics that are difficult to forecast reliably.

GHOSTCAT call history

Full track record →

Sep 22neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
BVdbH7...CScZ
Total Supply
999,994,468.44 GHOSTCAT

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($37.72K) relative to trading volume creates high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or frozen accounts
  • No sniper coverage means early-buyer dump risk cannot be quantified
  • Price already down ~46% from its intraday peak, suggesting the initial pump is cooling with declining volume

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Over the last 13 hourly candles the token exploded from an open near $0.0000127 (candle 1) to an intraday high of $0.001186 (candle 6), before pulling back and consolidating between roughly $0.00043 and $0.00081 through candles 7-13, closing the most recent candle at $0.000643. The move from candle 1 to candle 6 represents a nearly 100x spike within ~5 hours, followed by a volatile but comparatively range-bound retracement/consolidation phase.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Medium-term (13h) trend is sharply up (from ~$0.0000127 to current ~$0.00064, +1120% per the 24h stat), but short-term price action over the last 4-5 candles shows lower highs after the candle-6 peak of $0.001186, with the latest close of $0.000643 well below that peak — indicating short-term downside momentum/cooling off within a larger uptrend.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

52%

Sell

48%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000427 (candle 12 low)

Major support

$0.0000127 (candle 1 open / origin of the move)

Immediate resistance

$0.000806 (candle 10 high)

Major resistance

$0.001186 (candle 6 all-time high in this window)

Immediate support sits near $0.000427-0.000466 (recent candle lows in candles 9 and 12), with the more significant floor at the pre-pump base. Immediate resistance is the $0.000784-0.000846 zone tested repeatedly in candles 9-10, with the hard ceiling being the $0.001186 spike high from candle 6 that has not been retested.

Notable patterns

  • Parabolic pump candle (candle 1) with over 400,000 volume followed by immediate large-range reversal
  • Long upper wick rejection at candle 6 high ($0.001186) followed by lower closes — indicates selling into the spike
  • Series of lower highs across candles 7-11 (0.000846 -> 0.000806 -> 0.000604) suggesting short-term bearish structure within broader uptrend
  • Volume tapering off significantly (from 400K+ to 12-25K range) during consolidation, a classic post-pump cooldown pattern

Liquidity

Liquidity

$37,723.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of only $37.72K against 24h trading volume of over $1.25M combined (buy+sell) represents an extreme volume-to-liquidity ratio (>33x), indicating the pool is thin relative to trading activity and highly susceptible to slippage and price manipulation on even modest-sized trades. Buy volume ($648.29K) modestly exceeds sell volume ($606.34K), giving 51.7% buy pressure vs 48.3% sell pressure and a net inflow bias, consistent with the massive 24h price appreciation. However, with buyers (3,621) outnumbering sellers (2,598) and buy/sell counts skewed similarly (7,426 buys vs 5,047 sells), this pattern is also typical of a rapid pump phase on a shallow-liquidity Raydium CPMM pair, which can reverse quickly once buying momentum stalls.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,994,468.44 GHOSTCAT

FDV

$642,656

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change of +1120% and an intraday swing from $0.0000127 to $0.001186 (roughly 100x) followed by a ~46% pullback demonstrates extreme volatility typical of a freshly pumped micro-cap token.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity of only $37.72K against 24h combined volume exceeding $1.25M implies a volume/liquidity ratio over 33x, indicating shallow depth, high slippage risk, and vulnerability to large price impact from modest trade sizes.

  • Concentrationmedium

    Top 10 holders control approximately 18.8% of total supply per Codex snapshot data. This is a real but not extreme concentration figure; however, top-100 concentration and wallet classifications are unavailable, so full concentration risk cannot be fully assessed.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($37.72K) relative to trading volume creates high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or frozen accounts
  • No sniper coverage means early-buyer dump risk cannot be quantified
  • Price already down ~46% from its intraday peak, suggesting the initial pump is cooling with declining volume
  • Token has no description and unverified contract status per provided metadata, reducing transparency
  • Extreme recent volatility (+1120% 24h) makes the token highly susceptible to sharp reversals

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy volume slightly exceeds sell volume (51.7% vs 48.3%), showing net positive flow rather than a one-sided sell-off
  • Buyer count (3,621) exceeds seller count (2,598) in the last 24h
  • Top-10 holder concentration (18.8%) is not extreme relative to many micro-cap tokens, though full concentration picture is incomplete

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced traders comfortable with total loss of capital. This token exhibits classic characteristics of a freshly-launched, thinly-liquid, highly volatile micro-cap with multiple unresolved data gaps (mint/freeze authority, sniper activity, holder history). Not appropriate for conservative investors or those seeking capital preservation.

GHOSTCAT is a sub-$1M FDV Solana token that experienced an extreme +1120% 24h price spike on a shallow ($37.72K) liquidity pool, followed by a partial pullback and consolidation. The setup carries classic pump-and-fade characteristics combined with significant data gaps (unknown mint/freeze authority status, no sniper coverage, no holder history) that prevent a confident directional call. Any position should be treated as high-risk speculation, not a fundamentals-backed investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Renewed buyer momentum and possible liquidity additions push price back toward or beyond the recent $0.001186 high, supported by continued net-positive buy pressure and social media attention.

  • Sustained buy volume dominance (currently 51.7% vs 48.3% sell)
  • More buyers than sellers in the last 24h (3,621 vs 2,598)
  • Possible viral social/Twitter-driven attention cycle
  • Top-10 concentration (18.8%) not extreme, reducing immediate large-holder dump risk relative to more concentrated tokens

Base Case

Price consolidates in a wide range roughly between $0.00043 and $0.00081 over the near term as buy/sell pressure stays close to balanced, with continued high volatility and no clear resolution until liquidity conditions or new catalysts change.

  • No major liquidity injection or withdrawal occurs in the near term
  • Buy/sell pressure remains roughly balanced near current 51.7%/48.3% split
  • No new sniper/whale dumping event materializes beyond what's already reflected in the pullback from the candle-6 high
  • Data gaps (authorities, sniper activity) remain unresolved, keeping risk elevated

Bear Case

High probability

The pump fades further as early buyers and any undisclosed snipers/whales take profit into thin liquidity, driving price back toward pre-pump levels or lower, exacerbated by high slippage on exit.

  • Volume has already declined sharply from the initial spike (400K+ down to 12-25K per candle)
  • Price is down ~46% from the intraday peak, showing clear rejection at highs
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($37.72K) magnifies downside moves on sell pressure
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority and sniper data remove key safety checks that typically support sustained rallies
  • Classic single-hour parabolic candle followed by cooldown pattern historically often resolves lower over subsequent days

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 22, 11:46 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-22 11:45 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
  • Price and OHLC candle feed (13 hourly candles, Raydium CPMM pair)
  • Trading analytics (24h volume, buy/sell counts, buyer/seller counts)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count, top-10 concentration)
  • Sniper analysis feed (returned no data)

Limitations

  • No sniper/early-buyer data available, preventing assessment of dump risk from bot wallets
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) available, only a single current snapshot
  • No mint/freeze authority verification data provided, so rug-pull risk from authorities cannot be assessed
  • Only 13 hourly candles provided, limiting technical analysis depth and pattern reliability
  • Top-100 holder concentration and wallet classifications unavailable, limiting whale/distribution analysis
  • Extremely shallow liquidity means historical price action may not be representative of tradable depth

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain and market data with significant gaps (authority status, sniper activity, holder history). Cryptocurrency tokens, especially newly-launched micro-caps with shallow liquidity, carry substantial risk of loss, including total loss of capital. Conduct independent due diligence before making any investment decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Aave Ghost Cat ownership?

As of 2026-09-22 11:45 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 18.80% of supply. It reports 1,580 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Aave Ghost Cat?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-22 11:45 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $648,294.00 in buys and $606,338.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Aave Ghost Cat liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +56.82%, from $28,177.64 (2026-09-21 23:00 UTC) to $44,189.44 (2026-09-22 11:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Aave Ghost Cat (GHOSTCAT)?

After an extreme +1120% 24h pump followed by a pullback of roughly 46% from the intraday high, the token is likely to consolidate in a wide range as buy and sell pressure remain nearly balanced (51.7% vs 48.3%). A break below immediate support could accelerate profit-taking; a reclaim of resistance could re-attract momentum buyers, but shallow liquidity ($37.72K) makes both directions prone to sharp, low-conviction swings. Short-term outlook is neutral (24-48 hours), with a target range of $0.00043 to $0.00081.

Is GHOSTCAT a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 85/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced traders comfortable with total loss of capital. This token exhibits classic characteristics of a freshly-launched, thinly-liquid, highly volatile micro-cap with multiple unresolved data gaps (mint/freeze authority, sniper activity, holder history). Not appropriate for conservative investors or those seeking capital preservation.

What are the key risks of holding GHOSTCAT?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($37.72K) relative to trading volume creates high slippage and manipulation potential • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or frozen accounts • No sniper coverage means early-buyer dump risk cannot be quantified

← Back to all predictions

Track GHOSTCAT