FOUR

four.sol Price Prediction 2026

FOUR
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of May 17, 2026

CRuFEYSQiL41qS1srJEjqBLdujwAXvVfpn4h71zf4444

$0.052207

FDV $2,207

LiveContract:CRuFEYSQiL41qS1srJEjqBLdujwAXvVfpn4h71zf4444Chain:SolanaHolders:97Market cap:$2,207

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about FOUR

Report snapshotas of May 17, 05:48 PM
FDV

$46,956

Liquidity

$0

Holders

315

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

FOUR (four.sol) is a micro-cap Solana meme/vanity token (mint: CRuFEYSQiL41qS1srJEjqBLdujwAXvVfpn4h71zf4444) with a fully diluted valuation of ~$46,956 and a current price of ~$0.0000470. The token was flagged as possible spam by the data provider and carries no verified contract, no social links, and no project description. It experienced a dramatic 197% price spike in the past 24 hours accompanied by an explosive holder count jump from 8 to 315 — almost entirely within the last 24 hours. Supply is highly concentrated, with the top 10 wallets controlling 40.45% and the top 100 controlling 92.34%. Liquidity is reported as $0.00, indicating extremely shallow or non-existent on-chain liquidity depth. Overall risk is very high.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Vanity mint address ending in '4444' and name 'four.sol' suggest a numerology/meme theme with no fundamental utility
Explosive 197% 24h price pump accompanied by a near-instantaneous holder surge from 8 to 315 holders
Zero reported on-chain liquidity despite active trading volume (~$349K 24h combined), creating extreme slippage risk
Flagged as possible spam with no verified contract, no socials, and no description
No snipers detected in the first 1000 blocks — unusual for a pump event, may indicate coordinated wallet activity instead

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token has already retraced sharply — the 1h price change is -48.4% from the intraday high of ~$0.0000991 (candle [5]). The current price of ~$0.0000470 sits near the top of candle [1]'s close. With $0 reported liquidity, any sell pressure can cause violent downward moves. The 5m change is already -0.38%, suggesting continued softness. A retest of the $0.0000289–$0.0000342 range (candles [4]–[3] open/close) is likely in the near term.

Target low$0.0000117
Target high$0.0000536
Support: $0.0000342 (candle [1] open / candle [3] open), $0.0000289 (candle [4] open/low), $0.0000135 (candle [5] low)
Resistance: $0.0000470 (current price / candle [1] close), $0.0000536 (candle [6] high), $0.0000991 (candle [5] all-time high in dataset)

Medium term

bearish
1–4 weeks

The token spent 30 days with only 8 holders before a sudden pump-and-distribute event. With no utility, no socials, no liquidity, and a highly concentrated holder base, sustained price appreciation is unlikely. The medium-term outlook is bearish unless a coordinated marketing campaign or exchange listing materializes — neither of which is evidenced in the data.

Catalysts
  • Any legitimate project announcement or social media campaign (currently absent)
  • Broader Solana meme-coin market rally lifting all micro-caps
  • Whale accumulation at lower prices creating a new base

Bullish factors

  • 197% 24h price gain demonstrates strong short-term momentum
  • Buy pressure slightly dominates at 51.3% ($179.13K buys vs $169.96K sells)
  • Unique buyers (1,253) outnumber unique sellers (1,077) in 24h
  • No snipers detected, reducing immediate sniper dump risk

Bearish factors

  • $0.00 reported total liquidity — extreme slippage and exit risk
  • 1h price already down -48.4% from intraday peak
  • Flagged as possible spam with no verified contract or socials
  • Top 10 holders control 40.45%, top 100 control 92.34% — extreme concentration
  • Token had only 8 holders for 30+ days before the pump — classic pump-and-dump setup
  • No project description, no utility, no social presence
  • Update authority not renounced (WLHv2UAZm6z4KyaaELi5pjdbJh6RESMva1Rnn8pJVVh)
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) $0 reported liquidity making price discovery unreliable, (2) only 6 hourly candles of price history available, (3) possible spam flag suggesting manipulated or artificial activity, and (4) extreme volatility (intraday range of ~$0.0000117 to $0.0000991 in candle [5]) making directional prediction highly uncertain.

Deep Analysis

Six hourly candles are available (12:00–17:00 UTC, May 17 2026). Candle [6] (12:00): bullish, closed near high ($0.0000536), high volume ($63.8K). Candle [5] (13:00): extremely volatile — opened $0.0000535, spiked to $0.0000991 (all-time high in dataset), then crashed to $0.0000135 low, closing at $0.0000294. This is a massive bearish shooting star / inverted hammer with the highest volume ($152.9K) — a classic blow-off top signal. Candle [4] (14:00): recovery candle, opened and closed at $0.0000290–$0.0000340, moderate volume ($42.1K). Candle [3] (15:00): small-bodied candle, slight recovery to $0.0000366, low volume ($12.1K). Candle [2] (16:00): bearish candle, opened $0.0000364, closed $0.0000342, high volume ($43.1K) — distribution signal. Candle [1] (17:00): bullish recovery, opened $0.0000342, closed at high $0.0000470, lower volume ($15.2K). Overall pattern: blow-off top followed by volatile consolidation.

Trend

Short-term
sideways
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
neutral

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 51%Sell 49%

After the blow-off top in candle [5] at $0.0000991, the price has been making lower highs and volatile swings. The short-term is sideways/choppy between $0.0000289 and $0.0000470. The medium-term trend from the spike high is clearly downward. No sustained uptrend structure is established.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000342 (candle [1] open and candle [2] close)
Major$0.0000117–$0.0000135 (candle [5] and [6] lows — extreme wick zone)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0000536 (candle [6] high / candle [5] open area)
Major$0.0000991 (candle [5] all-time high in dataset — blow-off top)

The $0.0000342 level has acted as both support and resistance across multiple candles and is the key near-term pivot. A break below opens the door to the $0.0000135–$0.0000117 wick lows. The $0.0000536 level is immediate resistance. The $0.0000991 blow-off top is unlikely to be retested without a significant new catalyst.

Notable patterns

  • Candle [5]: Shooting star / blow-off top with extreme upper wick — strongest bearish reversal signal in the dataset
  • Candle [6]: Bullish engulfing-style close near high — preceded the spike
  • Candle [2]: Bearish close on elevated volume — distribution signal
  • Candle [1]: Bullish close at high on declining volume — weak recovery, not confirmed
  • Overall: Classic pump-and-dump candle structure with volume climax at top

Total holders315
24h Δ+307
7d Δ+307
30d Δ+307
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The holder count explosion from 8 to 315 (+307, +97% in 24h) is directly correlated with the 197% price pump. The historical data shows exactly 8 holders with zero change for the entire 30-day observation window (Apr 17 – May 16, 2026), followed by a sudden surge on May 17. This is a textbook pump-driven holder acquisition pattern where price action attracts retail buyers. The correlation is near-perfect but the causality is price-leading-holders, not organic community growth.

Holder growth is technically 'accelerating' in that it went from 0 new holders/day for 30 days to +307 in a single day. However, this is not organic growth — it is entirely pump-driven. The historical holder series shows a completely flat line at 8 holders from April 17 to May 16, 2026, with zero net change on any day. The sudden jump to 315 holders on May 17 coincides precisely with the price spike. Acquisition method breakdown (swap=310, transfer=5, airdrop=0) confirms these are retail buyers chasing the pump via DEX swaps. Holder distribution shows 120 whales and 114 dolphins, suggesting many new entrants bought meaningful positions. Sustainability of this holder count is questionable given the blow-off top price action.

Top 10 hold40.45%
Top 100 hold92.34%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

GpMZbSM2GgvTKHJirzeGfMFoaZ8UR2X7F4v8vHTvxFbL

Project treasury or team wallet — holds 19.16% (191.6M tokens), by far the largest single holder. Likely an original pre-pump accumulator given the 30-day dormancy period.

19.16%

2upZeByzjvevdUnvwBt2XHB1rro2AD9dBcRzU1BUUS4U

Individual whale or team wallet — holds 5.02% (50.2M tokens), second largest holder, likely part of the original 8-wallet cohort.

5.02%

J7tDFVR4F9m8DK6ykXAdYEtsLunrpQCvhwhCaPAd4wqC

Individual whale — holds 2.18% (21.8M tokens), possibly an original holder or large pump buyer.

2.18%

7NbT2Uq7cqwVgQXnGdM1Yy2sQUQts4MSqCyu8ybdjt8X

Individual whale — holds 2.11% (21.1M tokens), similar profile to holder #3.

2.11%

EEcvqP9iygH5iE1wA24eP1FZ1ByR8WjS3tUXDNUyV1dC

Individual whale — holds 2.08% (20.8M tokens), part of a cluster of wallets holding ~2% each (holders 5–10 all hold 1.88%–2.08%), suggesting possible coordinated wallet splitting.

2.08%

Supply concentration is extreme: top 10 wallets hold 40.45% and top 100 hold 92.34%, leaving only ~7.66% of supply distributed beyond the top 100. The largest holder (GpMZbSM2GgvTKHJirzeGfMFoaZ8UR2X7F4v8vHTvxFbL) controls 19.16% alone. Notably, holders 5–16 each hold between 1.72% and 2.08% — a suspiciously uniform distribution that may indicate wallet splitting by a coordinated team. The original 8 holders who sat dormant for 30+ days are the primary concentration risk. Sentiment is assessed as 'distributing' given the blow-off top price action and the -48.4% 1h retracement from the spike high, consistent with early holders selling into retail demand.

Liquidity$0.00 (as reported)
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$179,130
Sell$169,960
Net flow
inflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers1,253
Unique sellers1,077

The trading analytics report $0.00 total liquidity, which is a critical red flag. Despite $349K+ in combined 24h trading volume (3,551 buys, 2,541 sells) on a Raydium pair (6W69npHMWkpiQAY7RbN3s13BBMm278ScCuhkqPuEZBtw), the on-chain liquidity pool depth appears to be effectively zero or near-zero. This creates extreme slippage risk — any moderately sized sell order could collapse the price. The net flow is technically inflow (buys slightly exceed sells: $179.13K vs $169.96K, 51.3% buy pressure), and unique buyers (1,253) outnumber unique sellers (1,077). However, with $0 liquidity depth, these volume figures may reflect trades against a very thin order book, amplifying price volatility in both directions. Market health is critically poor.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,986,664.76 FOUR
FDV$46,955.86

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is ~1 billion FOUR tokens (999,986,664.76). The FDV is ~$46,956 at current prices — an extremely small market cap. The update authority is WLHv2UAZm6z4KyaaELi5pjdbJh6RESMva1Rnn8pJVVh, which is neither the burn address (11111...) nor explicitly renounced, meaning the metadata could theoretically be modified. However, the token is marked as 'Mutable: false', which limits metadata changes. Mint and freeze authority status are not explicitly provided in the data, so they are marked as unknown — this is a meaningful risk gap. The token is flagged as 'possible spam' by the data provider and has no verified contract. The combination of unknown authorities, possible spam flag, no socials, and no description creates a medium-to-high rug risk profile from an authority standpoint. The 'Mutable: false' flag provides some reassurance on metadata immutability.

Volatility
high

Intraday price range of $0.0000117 to $0.0000991 (candle [5]) represents an ~748% swing within a single hour. The 1h change is -48.4% from the spike high. Extreme volatility is inherent to this token's trading pattern.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity is reported as $0.00. Despite $349K+ in 24h volume, the pool depth is effectively zero, meaning any significant sell order will cause catastrophic price impact. Exit risk is extremely high.

Concentration
high

Top 10 wallets hold 40.45% of supply; top 100 hold 92.34%. The single largest holder controls 19.16%. A cluster of wallets (holders 5–16) each hold ~1.72%–2.08%, suggesting possible coordinated wallet splitting. Original 8 holders from the pre-pump period represent the primary dump risk.

SniperDump
low

Zero snipers detected in the first 1000 blocks. This specific risk vector is absent. However, the original 8 pre-pump holders serve a functionally similar role as early accumulators with large unrealized gains.

Authority
medium

Update authority (WLHv2UAZm6z4KyaaELi5pjdbJh6RESMva1Rnn8pJVVh) is not renounced. Mint and freeze authority status are unknown. Token is marked 'Mutable: false' which provides partial protection. Flagged as possible spam.

Key risks

  • $0.00 reported liquidity — catastrophic exit risk for any position size
  • Extreme supply concentration (top 10 = 40.45%, top 100 = 92.34%)
  • Token flagged as possible spam with no verified contract, no socials, no description
  • 30-day dormancy followed by sudden pump — classic pump-and-dump pattern
  • Blow-off top candle pattern with -48.4% 1h retracement already underway
  • Unknown mint and freeze authority status
  • Update authority not renounced
  • No fundamental utility or project backing identified

Mitigating factors

  • No snipers detected in first 1000 blocks — one specific dump vector absent
  • Token marked 'Mutable: false' — metadata cannot be arbitrarily changed
  • Buy pressure slightly positive (51.3%) with more unique buyers than sellers in 24h
  • Vanity mint address ('4444') and name ('four.sol') may attract numerology-themed meme community
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand the mechanics of micro-cap meme tokens and pump-and-dump dynamics. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose completely. Given the $0 liquidity, even experienced traders face severe exit risk.

FOUR (four.sol) is a high-risk micro-cap meme token that experienced a coordinated pump event on May 17, 2026, after 30+ days of complete dormancy with only 8 holders. The 197% price spike attracted 307 new holders in 24 hours, but the blow-off top pattern, $0 liquidity, extreme concentration, and spam flag make this a very high-risk speculative instrument with no identifiable fundamental value.

Bull case (low)

Meme/numerology narrative catches viral attention — the '4444' vanity address and 'four.sol' branding attract a dedicated community, liquidity is added to the Raydium pool, and the token becomes a recognized Solana meme coin.

  • Viral social media campaign around the '4444' numerology theme
  • Liquidity injection into the Raydium pool enabling sustainable trading
  • Broader Solana meme-coin market rally lifting micro-caps
  • Listing on a meme-coin aggregator or influencer promotion

Base case

Price consolidates at a significantly lower level than the pump high (~$0.0000991), settling somewhere in the $0.0000100–$0.0000300 range as early holders distribute and retail interest fades. Token remains active but illiquid with a small holder base.

  • Some retail holders maintain positions hoping for a second pump
  • Original holders partially distribute but don't fully exit immediately
  • No new liquidity or marketing materializes
  • Price finds a temporary floor at the $0.0000135 wick low from candle [5]

Bear case (high)

Classic pump-and-dump completion — original 8 holders sell remaining positions into retail demand, liquidity evaporates entirely, price collapses to near zero, and the token becomes inactive again.

  • Original pre-pump holders (especially the 19.16% top holder) selling into the pump
  • $0 liquidity means any selling causes catastrophic price collapse
  • No project fundamentals to sustain holder interest post-pump
  • Spam flag and lack of socials prevent organic community formation

GeneratedMay 17, 05:48 PM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 17:00 UTC on May 17, 2026. OHLC data covers only the most recent 6 hourly candles. Historical holder data covers 30 days.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (mint, authority, supply, decimals)
  • Raydium DEX pair data (pair: 6W69npHMWkpiQAY7RbN3s13BBMm278ScCuhkqPuEZBtw)
  • OHLC hourly candle data (6 candles, May 17 2026 12:00–17:00 UTC)
  • 24h trading analytics (volume, buys/sells, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data (top 20 holders, acquisition breakdown)
  • Historical holder time series (30 days, daily)
  • Sniper analysis (first 1000 blocks)

Limitations

  • Only 6 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis or trend identification
  • Total liquidity reported as $0.00 — may be a data reporting issue or reflect genuinely empty pool; either way, exit risk is extreme
  • Mint and freeze authority status not explicitly provided — marked as unknown
  • No sniper data available (0 snipers) — limits smart money analysis
  • Token flagged as possible spam — data reliability may be affected
  • No social links or project description to assess team legitimacy or roadmap
  • 30-day holder history shows only 8 holders until May 17 — very limited baseline for trend analysis
  • FDV reported as $0.00 in trading analytics but $46,955.86 in metadata — discrepancy noted; metadata figure used

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. FOUR (four.sol) is an extremely high-risk token flagged as possible spam with no verified contract, no liquidity, and no identifiable fundamental value. Do not invest funds you cannot afford to lose entirely. Past price performance (including the 197% 24h gain) is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,986,664.76 FOUR

Key Risks

$0.00 reported liquidity — catastrophic exit risk for any position size
Extreme supply concentration (top 10 = 40.45%, top 100 = 92.34%)
Token flagged as possible spam with no verified contract, no socials, no description
30-day dormancy followed by sudden pump — classic pump-and-dump pattern

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No snipers were detected in the first 1000 blocks, which is unusual for a token that experienced a 197% pump. This could indicate: (1) the pump was orchestrated by pre-existing holders (the 8 wallets that held for 30+ days) rather than bot snipers, or (2) the token launch mechanics prevented typical sniper activity. The absence of snipers reduces one specific dump vector but does not eliminate concentration risk from the original 8 holders who accumulated before the public pump.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

0 snipers detected in the first 1000 blocks — no sniper concentration data available

The 8 wallets that held FOUR for 30+ days before the pump are the true early buyers. These wallets likely accumulated at much lower prices and are now sitting on significant unrealized gains following the 197% pump. Their sell behavior will be the primary price driver. Given the blow-off top pattern already observed, profit-taking from these early holders appears to have begun (evidenced by the -48.4% 1h retracement from the spike high).

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for four.sol (FOUR)?

The token has already retraced sharply — the 1h price change is -48.4% from the intraday high of ~$0.0000991 (candle [5]). The current price of ~$0.0000470 sits near the top of candle [1]'s close. With $0 reported liquidity, any sell pressure can cause violent downward moves. The 5m change is already -0.38%, suggesting continued softness. A retest of the $0.0000289–$0.0000342 range (candles [4]–[3] open/close) is likely in the near term. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.0000117 to $0.0000536.

Is FOUR a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand the mechanics of micro-cap meme tokens and pump-and-dump dynamics. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose completely. Given the $0 liquidity, even experienced traders face severe exit risk.

How are FOUR holders trending?

four.sol currently has 315 holders and is growing (24h: 307, 7d: 307, 30d: 307). Holder growth is technically 'accelerating' in that it went from 0 new holders/day for 30 days to +307 in a single day. However, this is not organic growth — it is entirely pump-driven. The historical holder series shows a completely flat line at 8 holders from April 17 to May 16, 2026, with zero net change on any day. The sudden jump to 315 holders on May 17 coincides precisely with the price spike. Acquisition method breakdown (swap=310, transfer=5, airdrop=0) confirms these are retail buyers chasing the pump via DEX swaps. Holder distribution shows 120 whales and 114 dolphins, suggesting many new entrants bought meaningful positions. Sustainability of this holder count is questionable given the blow-off top price action.

What does sniper activity look like for FOUR?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding FOUR?

$0.00 reported liquidity — catastrophic exit risk for any position size • Extreme supply concentration (top 10 = 40.45%, top 100 = 92.34%) • Token flagged as possible spam with no verified contract, no socials, no description

Track FOUR