MADVULT

Mad Vulture Price Today & AI Analysis

MADVULTSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 23, 2026

Price

$0.053582

-92.46% 24h · FDV $3,538

Contract

Live
MadVLQYW7VUzfMdMDHuS3UVgJSNUQGwvobYgYZxpqp6

Chain

Holders

988

Market cap

$3,538

More tokens on Solana

Mad Vulture: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-23 18:15 UTC

Holder addresses

988

Top 10 supply share

96.40%

Reported liquidity

$3,075.00
How concentrated is Mad Vulture ownership?
As of 2026-09-23 18:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 96.40% of supply. It reports 988 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Mad Vulture?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-23 18:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $1,828,696.00 in buys and $1,808,543.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Mad Vulture liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed -91.14%, from $34,745.50 (2026-09-23 17:00 UTC) to $3,077.24 (2026-09-23 18:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-23 18:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-23 17:00 UTC$34,745.50
2026-09-23 18:00 UTC$3,077.24

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about MADVULT

Continue in chat

Report snapshot

as of Sep 23, 06:16 PM UTC

FDV

$3,538

Liquidity

$3,075.00

Holders

988

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Mad Vulture (MADVULT) is a micro-cap PumpSwap token with a fully diluted value of just ~$3.5K and total liquidity of ~$3.1K. The token experienced an extreme spike-and-collapse in the last two observed hourly candles, with price rocketing from ~$0.0000032 to ~$0.00071 and then crashing back to ~$0.0000036 -- a round-trip move of roughly 99% within one hour. 24h price change is reported at -92.46%. Holder concentration is extreme, with the top 10 addresses controlling 96.4% of supply across 988 holder addresses. No sniper data, authority renouncement data, or holder history is available, leaving major risk vectors unverifiable.

Key points

  • Extreme single-candle spike (O:$0.0000032 to H:$0.00071) followed by a near-total collapse to $0.0000036, indicating a pump-and-dump or liquidity/oracle anomaly
  • Top-10 holders control 96.4% of the 987.8M token supply -- one of the most concentrated distributions observable
  • Tiny liquidity pool (~$3.08K) and FDV (~$3.54K) mean even small trades can move price dramatically
  • Mint/freeze authority status and sniper wallet activity are both unverifiable from available data, a significant transparency gap
  • 24h volume ($1.83M buy / $1.81M sell) is wildly disproportionate to the ~$3K liquidity pool, suggesting wash trading, bot activity, or data anomalies rather than organic demand

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

Price just collapsed ~99% from an intra-hour spike high of $0.000711 down to $0.0000036, essentially round-tripping back near its pre-spike level. With liquidity this thin (~$3.08K) and FDV this low (~$3.54K), price action is dominated by micro-trades and is highly erratic. Absent a fresh liquidity or narrative catalyst, momentum favors continued weakness or extreme volatility in either direction.

Target low

$0.0000015

Target high

$0.0000060

Support

$0.00000319 (candle 1 open/low, pre-spike base), $0.0000033 (candle 2 low)

Resistance

$0.00000358 (current price), $0.000458 (candle 2 open, post-spike retrace level), $0.000711 (spike high -- likely unsustainable outlier)

Medium term · 3-14 days

bearish

With only two hourly candles of data and no deeper OHLC history, medium-term trend cannot be reliably established. However, the combination of a violent spike/crash pattern, razor-thin liquidity, and 96.4% top-10 concentration suggests high risk of further volatility, potential rug-pull dynamics, or liquidity withdrawal by dominant holders.

Catalysts

  • Potential liquidity additions or removals from PumpSwap pool given its tiny size
  • Actions by top-10 holders controlling 96.4% of supply -- any coordinated sell would crater price
  • Social media activity (Twitter/Telegram) could reignite speculative interest or accelerate exit
  • Lack of verifiable mint/freeze authority status leaves rug-pull risk fully open

Confidence: low. Only two hourly candles are available, no sniper data, no holder history, and no confirmed authority status. The extreme spike-crash pattern combined with near-total holder concentration makes any directional call speculative rather than evidence-based.

MADVULT call history

Full track record →

Sep 23bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
MadVLQ...pqp6
Total Supply
987,838,899.71 MADVULT

Key Risks

  • Extreme top-10 holder concentration (96.4%) creates high risk of coordinated dumping or single-wallet-driven price collapse
  • Liquidity of only ~$3.08K is grossly mismatched with reported ~$3.64M 24h volume, suggesting wash trading, thin real depth, or unreliable data
  • Mint and freeze authority status unknown -- cannot rule out unlimited minting or account freezing capability
  • No sniper data available to assess whether early bot wallets are positioned to dump remaining holdings

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (17:00 UTC) opened at $0.00000319, spiked to a high of $0.000711 (a ~223x intra-candle move) before closing at $0.000458, on volume of ~3.14M. Candle 2 (18:00 UTC) opened at that elevated $0.000458 level, immediately dropped to a low of $0.00000326, and closed near the low at $0.00000358, on volume of ~560K. This is a textbook blow-off spike followed by a near-total retrace -- effectively giving back almost the entire gain within the same hour.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

The only two available candles show a sharp spike immediately reversed into a near-complete collapse, placing the token firmly in a short-term downtrend back toward pre-spike levels. Insufficient data exists to assess a true medium-term trend beyond noting the round-trip failure.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000033 (candle 2 low)

Major support

$0.00000319 (candle 1 open, pre-spike baseline)

Immediate resistance

$0.0000045 (recent trading area shortly after spike)

Major resistance

$0.000711 (spike high, likely anomalous/unsustainable)

With only two candles of data, key levels are provisional. The pre-spike base near $0.0000032 acts as a natural floor since price has already round-tripped there once; a break below would signal fresh weakness. The spike high near $0.00071 is almost certainly an outlier driven by thin liquidity and should not be treated as a realistic resistance target for normal trading.

Notable patterns

  • Blow-off spike and crash within a single hour (~223x up, then ~99.5% down)
  • Near-complete round-trip retracement to pre-spike price levels
  • Volume climax on the spike candle followed by sharply reduced volume on the collapse candle

Liquidity

Liquidity

$3,075.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $3.08K against a reported 24h combined volume of ~$3.64M ($1.83M buy + $1.81M sell) is a glaring inconsistency -- volume outpacing liquidity by over 1,000x in a single day strongly suggests wash trading, bot-driven round-trip trades, or data artifacts rather than genuine organic market depth. With such shallow liquidity, any real trade of even a few hundred dollars would likely cause significant slippage, consistent with the observed 99%+ intra-hour price swings. The near-even 50.3%/49.7% buy/sell split does not match the severe net price decline, reinforcing that headline volume figures may not reflect tradable depth.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

987,838,899.71 MADVULT

FDV

$3,538

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price moved from $0.00000319 to a high of $0.000711 (~223x) and back down to $0.0000036 within two consecutive hourly candles, a magnitude of volatility consistent with extreme pump-and-dump behavior or a low-liquidity data anomaly.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only ~$3.08K against a reported ~$3.64M in 24h combined volume, indicating the pool cannot support the claimed trading activity without severe slippage or reflects wash/bot trading.

  • Concentrationhigh

    Top-10 holders control 96.4% of the total supply of 987.8M tokens, an extremely concentrated distribution that gives a handful of wallets outsized control over price via potential coordinated selling.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extreme top-10 holder concentration (96.4%) creates high risk of coordinated dumping or single-wallet-driven price collapse
  • Liquidity of only ~$3.08K is grossly mismatched with reported ~$3.64M 24h volume, suggesting wash trading, thin real depth, or unreliable data
  • Mint and freeze authority status unknown -- cannot rule out unlimited minting or account freezing capability
  • No sniper data available to assess whether early bot wallets are positioned to dump remaining holdings
  • Observed 99%+ intra-hour price collapse indicates the token is either newly launched, thinly traded, or subject to manipulation
  • No holder history available to establish whether the community/base is growing or shrinking

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy volume ($1.83M) nominally exceeds sell volume ($1.81M), a roughly balanced 50.3/49.7 split at the aggregate level, though this should be weighed against the liquidity/volume mismatch
  • Token has social presence (Twitter, Telegram, website) suggesting some community infrastructure exists, though engagement quality is unverified

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly speculative traders with very high risk tolerance who can afford total loss of capital. The combination of micro-cap FDV (~$3.5K), extreme holder concentration (96.4% in top 10), unverifiable mint/freeze authority status, absent sniper data, and a violent spike-and-crash price pattern make this unsuitable for risk-averse or long-term investors. Position sizing, if any, should be treated as a total-loss bet.

MADVULT is an extremely small, thinly-liquid PumpSwap token that just experienced a dramatic pump-and-crash cycle, collapsing over 92% from its 24h reference point and giving back nearly all of an intra-hour 223x spike. With 96.4% of supply concentrated in the top 10 holders, unknown mint/freeze authority status, and no sniper or holder-history data to corroborate organic demand, the risk profile is dominated by concentration and transparency gaps rather than fundamentals.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If the spike was driven by genuine speculative interest (e.g., social media virality referenced in its Twitter/Telegram/website links) and liquidity is added while the top holders refrain from selling, price could stabilize or attempt another upward move from current depressed levels near $0.0000036.

  • Renewed social media attention could reignite speculative buying
  • 3,293 unique 24h buyers vs 3,011 sellers shows nominally more buyer participation
  • If liquidity providers add depth to the $3.08K pool, slippage-driven volatility could reduce

Base Case

Price continues to trade erratically at very low absolute levels (sub-$0.00001) with thin liquidity producing large percentage swings on small trades, while the extreme concentration and unknown authority status keep the token firmly in speculative/high-risk territory without a clear directional resolution.

  • No major liquidity injection or removal occurs in the near term
  • Top-10 holders neither fully exit nor add meaningfully to positions
  • No new verifiable information emerges on mint/freeze authority or sniper activity

Bear Case

High probability

The top-10 wallets (96.4% of supply) exit further, or the spike proves to be a bot-driven/wash-trading artifact with no real demand, leading price to continue toward or below the pre-spike base of ~$0.0000032 and liquidity to dry up entirely.

  • 96.4% top-10 concentration allows a small number of wallets to crater the price at will
  • Liquidity of only $3.08K cannot absorb meaningful sell pressure without severe price impact
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply dilution or account freezes
  • The 223x spike-then-crash pattern in a single hour is a classic signature of pump-and-dump or manipulated low-liquidity trading

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 23, 06:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-23 18:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Token metadata (Codex/on-chain)
  • USD price feed
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (2 candles available)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • Sniper analysis (unavailable/empty for this token)
  • Holder aggregates (Codex current snapshot: holder count and top-10 concentration only)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles were available, preventing robust trend, support/resistance, or pattern analysis beyond the immediate spike-crash event
  • No sniper wallet data was available, preventing assessment of sniper concentration, PnL, or dump risk
  • No holder history was available -- only a single current snapshot of holder count (988) and top-10 concentration (96.4%), so growth/accumulation/distribution trends could not be assessed
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, verified contract status, and mutability were all marked 'unknown' in source data and could not be verified through other means
  • Reported 24h volume (~$3.64M combined) appears grossly inconsistent with total liquidity (~$3.08K), suggesting possible data artifacts, wash trading, or bot activity that could not be independently verified
  • No top-100 holder concentration or wallet classification data was available

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain data and should not be the sole basis for any investment decision. Cryptocurrency trading, especially in micro-cap and low-liquidity tokens like MADVULT, carries a very high risk of total capital loss. Always conduct independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Mad Vulture ownership?

As of 2026-09-23 18:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 96.40% of supply. It reports 988 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Mad Vulture?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-23 18:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $1,828,696.00 in buys and $1,808,543.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Mad Vulture liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed -91.14%, from $34,745.50 (2026-09-23 17:00 UTC) to $3,077.24 (2026-09-23 18:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Mad Vulture (MADVULT)?

Price just collapsed ~99% from an intra-hour spike high of $0.000711 down to $0.0000036, essentially round-tripping back near its pre-spike level. With liquidity this thin (~$3.08K) and FDV this low (~$3.54K), price action is dominated by micro-trades and is highly erratic. Absent a fresh liquidity or narrative catalyst, momentum favors continued weakness or extreme volatility in either direction. Short-term outlook is bearish (1-24 hours), with a target range of $0.0000015 to $0.0000060.

Is MADVULT a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 92/100. This token is suitable only for highly speculative traders with very high risk tolerance who can afford total loss of capital. The combination of micro-cap FDV (~$3.5K), extreme holder concentration (96.4% in top 10), unverifiable mint/freeze authority status, absent sniper data, and a violent spike-and-crash price pattern make this unsuitable for risk-averse or long-term investors. Position sizing, if any, should be treated as a total-loss bet.

What are the key risks of holding MADVULT?

Extreme top-10 holder concentration (96.4%) creates high risk of coordinated dumping or single-wallet-driven price collapse • Liquidity of only ~$3.08K is grossly mismatched with reported ~$3.64M 24h volume, suggesting wash trading, thin real depth, or unreliable data • Mint and freeze authority status unknown -- cannot rule out unlimited minting or account freezing capability

← Back to all predictions

Track MADVULT