ZAMA

Zama Price Today & AI Analysis

ZAMASolanaAnalysis as of Sep 24, 2026

Price

$0.0884

-5.40% 24h

Contract

Live
4Zp52aF4hZi9fzH19xpbWKYKQvgLyCN67KFbrQDqeTKh

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,828

Market cap

$1,316,436

More tokens on Solana

UUSOUnited States Oil Fund, LP - Backpack Securities$148.7+3.3%MC $173.1KCDOGCDOGCypher Dog$0.000214+63.7%MC $213.9KRAWRRAWRJurassic$0.0701-34.1%MC $1.81MZEBRAZEBRAZebra$0.043250-45.9%MC $31.5KBPBPBarking Puppy$0.002658+15.6%MC $2.59MRAYRAYRaydium$1.99+8.6%MC $1.10B

Zama: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-24 22:45 UTC

Holder addresses

1,828

Top 10 supply share

59.89%

Reported liquidity

$80,365.00
How concentrated is Zama ownership?
As of 2026-09-24 22:45 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 59.89% of supply. It reports 1,828 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Zama?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-24 22:45 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $48,770.00 in buys and $69,867.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Zama liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +69.29%, from $154,796.09 (2026-09-23 23:00 UTC) to $262,052.60 (2026-09-24 22:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-24 22:45 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-23 23:00 UTC$154,796.09
2026-09-24 00:00 UTC$154,508.77
2026-09-24 01:00 UTC$154,509.15
2026-09-24 02:00 UTC$159,344.17
2026-09-24 03:00 UTC$158,493.84
2026-09-24 04:00 UTC$158,269.13
2026-09-24 07:00 UTC$158,548.30
2026-09-24 08:00 UTC$158,556.98
2026-09-24 09:00 UTC$160,907.53
2026-09-24 10:00 UTC$158,522.68
2026-09-24 11:00 UTC$158,512.21
2026-09-24 12:00 UTC$159,631.67
2026-09-24 13:00 UTC$158,226.46
2026-09-24 14:00 UTC$346,218.33
2026-09-24 15:00 UTC$331,794.60
2026-09-24 16:00 UTC$454,553.53
2026-09-24 17:00 UTC$337,570.47
2026-09-24 18:00 UTC$263,989.99
2026-09-24 19:00 UTC$262,335.44
2026-09-24 20:00 UTC$265,418.87
2026-09-24 21:00 UTC$260,587.32
2026-09-24 22:00 UTC$262,052.60

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about ZAMA

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 24, 10:46 PM UTC

FDV

$1,316,436

Liquidity

$80,365.00

Holders

1,828

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

ZAMA is a Solana-based micro-cap token (FDV ~$1.32M) trading against USD on a Raydium CLMM pool with only $80.36K in total liquidity. The 24h window shows a pump-and-fade pattern - a sharp spike to $0.1101 followed by a fade back to $0.0890, closing down 5.4% - alongside net sell pressure (58.9% sell vs 41.1% buy volume) and very high holder concentration (top 10 wallets hold 59.89% of the 14.89M token supply). Several important due-diligence inputs, including holder history, mint/freeze authority status, and sniper wallet data, are unavailable, leaving material unknowns in the risk picture.

Key points

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($80.36K) relative to FDV ($1.32M), creating high slippage risk
  • Top-10 holder concentration of 59.89% is a significant centralization risk in a thinly traded pool
  • 24h trading shows net outflow with sellers (875) outnumbering buyers (584)
  • Recent price action shows a pronounced pump-and-fade pattern with an anomalous low-wick candle, suggesting volatile and possibly thin/erratic order book conditions
  • Key risk inputs (mint/freeze authority, sniper data, holder history) are entirely missing, limiting the completeness of this risk assessment

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24-48 hours

bearish

Short-term momentum is soft following the pump-and-fade in hour 16, with lower highs and lower closes through the final candles of the window. Price is testing the $0.0885-0.0890 support zone; a break lower could accelerate declines given shallow liquidity, while a bounce could retest $0.0947.

Target low

$0.0820

Target high

$0.0950

Support

$0.0885, $0.0893

Resistance

$0.0947, $0.0983

Medium term · 1-2 weeks

neutral

Without holder history, sniper data, or authority verification, medium-term direction is highly uncertain. The token's fate likely depends on whether community/social catalysts (Twitter, Telegram, Discord activity) can sustain buyer interest against a backdrop of concentrated supply and thin liquidity.

Catalysts

  • Potential social media or community-driven demand spikes similar to the hour-16 volume surge
  • Any resolution of authority/mint status (positive if renounced, negative if not)
  • Changes in holder concentration if top-10 wallets begin distributing into the thin liquidity pool

Bullish factors

  • Active social presence (Twitter, Telegram, Discord, website) suggests ongoing community engagement
  • 584 unique buyers in 24h indicates continued organic interest despite the price dip
  • Recent 1h price change is marginally positive (+0.05%), hinting at short-term stabilization

Bearish factors

  • Net sell pressure with sell volume ($69.87K) exceeding buy volume ($48.77K) by ~43%
  • Top-10 holder concentration at 59.89% creates outsized dump risk
  • Shallow $80.36K liquidity pool amplifies volatility and slippage in either direction
  • Price has fully round-tripped the hour-16 spike gains, closing the 24h period down 5.4%

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because key inputs - historical holder trends, sniper wallet behavior, and mint/freeze authority status - are all unavailable. The available OHLC data also includes at least one likely anomalous print (the $0.0315 wick), reducing confidence in technical levels derived purely from the 24-candle window. Predictions are based on a very limited 24-hour data sample for a low-liquidity token.

ZAMA call history

Full track record →

Sep 24bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
4Zp52a...eTKh
Total Supply
14,894,059.54 ZAMA

Key Risks

  • Very high holder concentration (top 10 = 59.89% of supply) in a token with only $80.36K total liquidity
  • Shallow liquidity pool relative to $1.32M FDV creates high slippage and price impact risk
  • Net sell pressure over the last 24h (58.9% sell vs 41.1% buy volume, 875 sellers vs 584 buyers) alongside a 5.4% price decline
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezes

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Over the most recent 24 hourly candles, price started near $0.0893, drifted up with low volume through a series of flat/quiet candles (hours 2-11, several with zero or near-zero volume), then broke sharply higher in hour 16 with an outsized volume spike (~2.96M) taking price from ~$0.0938 to an intraday high of $0.1101 before closing at $0.0982. This was followed by a gradual multi-candle decline (hours 17-24) back down to a close of $0.0890, giving back nearly all of the spike's gains. Hour 4 shows an extreme low wick to $0.0315 on a single candle, likely a brief liquidity gap or outlier print given the shallow pool.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term (last ~8 hours) price is in a clear downtrend, falling from the post-spike high near $0.098 down to $0.089. Medium-term (full 24h window) the trend is closer to sideways-to-volatile, since price began near $0.089, spiked to $0.110, and returned to roughly the same starting level, netting a -5.4% change on the day.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

41%

Sell

59%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0885 (24h candle low, hour 23)

Major support

$0.0893 (session open / hour 1 open level)

Immediate resistance

$0.0947 (hour 14-15 close/high zone)

Major resistance

$0.1101 (hour 16 intraday spike high)

Price is currently trading just above the session's immediate support around $0.0885-0.0890, having round-tripped from the spike high of $0.1101. A close below $0.0885 would break the recent range low and open downside toward the $0.0315 outlier wick, though that print looks anomalous and likely doesn't represent a reliable support level. Reclaiming $0.0947 and then $0.098 would be needed to indicate renewed bullish momentum toward the $0.11 highs.

Notable patterns

  • Sharp volume/price spike candle (hour 16) resembling a blow-off or news-driven pump, followed by gradual multi-hour fade - a classic pump-and-fade pattern
  • Several flat, zero-volume candles (hours 2, 7, 8, 10) indicating very thin trading during off-peak periods, typical of a low-liquidity micro-cap
  • Sequence of lower highs and lower closes from hour 17 through hour 24, suggesting short-term bearish momentum following the spike
  • One extreme low wick to $0.0315 in hour 4 far below surrounding price action, likely a liquidity/data outlier rather than genuine support

Liquidity

Liquidity

$80,365.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $80.36K against a fully diluted valuation of $1.32M represents a shallow pool that is highly susceptible to slippage on even modest-sized trades. 24h sell volume ($69.87K) exceeds buy volume ($48.77K), producing net outflow and a sell pressure of 58.9% vs 41.1% buy pressure. Sellers (875) outnumber buyers (584) by a meaningful margin, corroborating the observed 24h price decline of -5.4%. This combination of thin liquidity and negative net flow makes the token vulnerable to sharp price swings in either direction, and large holders exiting could disproportionately move price given the small liquidity base.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

14,894,059.54 ZAMA

FDV

$1.32M

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price swung from a low near $0.0885 to a high near $0.1101 (candle 16), a range of roughly 24%, with a sharp spike and reversion; 24h close is down 5.4%. This is characteristic of a highly volatile, thinly traded micro-cap.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $80.36K against a $1.32M FDV, and 24h sell volume ($69.87K) outweighs buy volume ($48.77K), signaling shallow depth and high slippage risk for any meaningfully sized trade.

  • Concentrationhigh

    Top-10 holder wallets control 59.89% of total supply. Top-100 concentration and any wallet classification data are unavailable, but the top-10 figure alone represents a very high concentration that could enable coordinated or single-actor dumping.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Very high holder concentration (top 10 = 59.89% of supply) in a token with only $80.36K total liquidity
  • Shallow liquidity pool relative to $1.32M FDV creates high slippage and price impact risk
  • Net sell pressure over the last 24h (58.9% sell vs 41.1% buy volume, 875 sellers vs 584 buyers) alongside a 5.4% price decline
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezes
  • No sniper coverage data available, so early-buyer dump risk cannot be ruled out
  • One large anomalous candle (hour 16) showed volume spiking to ~$2.96M with a wick low crashing to $0.0315 in an earlier candle (hour 4), suggesting possible manipulation, thin order book, or data irregularities

Mitigating factors

  • Token has established social presence links (Twitter, Telegram, Discord, website) suggesting an active community/project, though authenticity is not verified
  • Trading activity shows hundreds of daily buyers (584) and transactions, indicating some organic interest rather than complete illiquidity
  • Price has stabilized somewhat in the most recent few candles after the mid-period spike/reversion

Suitable for

Given the very high risk score driven by concentrated holdings, shallow liquidity, negative net flow, and unresolved authority/sniper data gaps, this token is only suitable for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who can withstand full loss of capital and who actively manage position sizing against the thin $80.36K liquidity pool. It is not suitable for risk-averse or long-horizon holders seeking capital preservation.

ZAMA is a micro-cap Solana token (~$1.32M FDV) trading on a shallow $80.36K liquidity Raydium CLMM pool, currently down 5.4% over 24h after a sharp intraday pump-and-fade. On-chain evidence shows very high holder concentration (top 10 = 59.89%), net sell pressure (58.9% sell vs 41.1% buy volume), and significant unresolved due-diligence gaps around mint/freeze authorities and sniper wallet behavior. This is a high-risk, speculative setup suited only to traders comfortable with substantial downside and limited liquidity.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buy-side demand returns and price reclaims the $0.0947-$0.098 resistance zone with rising volume, ZAMA could retest and potentially exceed the recent $0.1101 spike high, especially if driven by social media/community catalysts given its active Twitter/Telegram/Discord presence.

  • A repeat of the kind of volume spike seen in hour 16 (2.96M volume) driven by social/community catalysts
  • Reduction in sell pressure and net inflow reversal
  • Continued growth in unique buyer count (584 buyers seen in the last 24h) outpacing sellers

Base Case

Price likely continues to consolidate in a volatile sideways range roughly between $0.085 and $0.098, with periodic volume spikes and fades, reflecting a thinly-traded micro-cap without clear directional catalysts in the immediate term.

  • No major new catalyst emerges in the short term
  • Holder concentration and liquidity conditions remain largely unchanged
  • Trading volume continues to be sporadic (alternating low-volume and spike periods) as seen in the 24h candle history

Bear Case

Medium probability

Continued net outflow and concentrated holder selling could push price below the $0.0885 immediate support, with the shallow $80.36K liquidity pool amplifying downside moves and slippage on exits.

  • Top-10 wallets holding 59.89% of supply create outsized dump risk in a thin liquidity pool
  • 24h sell volume already exceeds buy volume by ~43% ($69.87K vs $48.77K)
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open a tail risk of supply dilution or account restrictions
  • Lack of sniper data coverage means early-buyer dump risk is entirely unmonitored

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 24, 10:46 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-24 22:45 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
  • 24h hourly OHLC candle data (Raydium CLMM pair GjmJAd1VJwwY5SWA6kWeQAv1uDZe15FnSi1fJQAUUCNr)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price % changes)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count, top-10 concentration)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data for this token)

Limitations

  • No historical holder count data (24h/7d/30d) available - only a single current snapshot, so growth trends and price correlation could not be assessed
  • No wallet classification or labeling data available - notable holders (team, exchange, whale, etc.) could not be identified
  • Sniper analysis data was unavailable entirely for this token, preventing assessment of early-buyer dump risk or sniper PnL
  • Mint authority and freeze authority renouncement status not provided, preventing rug-risk determination from authorities
  • Top-100 holder concentration figure not provided, only top-10
  • One OHLC candle (hour 4) contains an extreme low wick ($0.0315) that appears anomalous relative to surrounding price action and may reflect a data or liquidity artifact rather than genuine trading
  • Analysis is based on a single 24-hour window, which is a short sample for a token that appears to have limited and sporadic trading history

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from a limited, partially incomplete on-chain data set (missing holder history, sniper coverage, and authority verification) and should not be the sole basis for any investment decision. Cryptocurrency markets, especially thinly-traded micro-cap tokens, carry very high risk of substantial or total loss. Conduct independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Zama ownership?

As of 2026-09-24 22:45 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 59.89% of supply. It reports 1,828 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Zama?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-24 22:45 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $48,770.00 in buys and $69,867.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Zama liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +69.29%, from $154,796.09 (2026-09-23 23:00 UTC) to $262,052.60 (2026-09-24 22:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Zama (ZAMA)?

Short-term momentum is soft following the pump-and-fade in hour 16, with lower highs and lower closes through the final candles of the window. Price is testing the $0.0885-0.0890 support zone; a break lower could accelerate declines given shallow liquidity, while a bounce could retest $0.0947. Short-term outlook is bearish (24-48 hours), with a target range of $0.0820 to $0.0950.

Is ZAMA a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 82/100. Given the very high risk score driven by concentrated holdings, shallow liquidity, negative net flow, and unresolved authority/sniper data gaps, this token is only suitable for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who can withstand full loss of capital and who actively manage position sizing against the thin $80.36K liquidity pool. It is not suitable for risk-averse or long-horizon holders seeking capital preservation.

What are the key risks of holding ZAMA?

Very high holder concentration (top 10 = 59.89% of supply) in a token with only $80.36K total liquidity • Shallow liquidity pool relative to $1.32M FDV creates high slippage and price impact risk • Net sell pressure over the last 24h (58.9% sell vs 41.1% buy volume, 875 sellers vs 584 buyers) alongside a 5.4% price decline

← Back to all predictions

Track ZAMA