LeoGuigna

LeoGuigna Price Today & AI Analysis

LeoGuignaSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 23, 2026

Price

$0.000952

+1831.36% 24h · FDV $920,232

Contract

Live
AgxyNjRhc2185eGATkQcanNG6J2pCQcdhxbaSrEXpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,502

Market cap

$920,232

More tokens on Solana

xSOLxSOLxSOL$0.0908-1.1%MC $14.82MGMEXGMEXGameStop xStock$24.27+3.6%MC $17.47Mkirkinukirkinukirkinu$0.000120+150.3%MC $116.1KarcarcAI Rig Complex$0.0816+6.8%MC $81.58MCLIPCLIPCLIPBACK$0.000426-43.3%MC $406.7KANTFUNANTFUNAntFun$0.009311-88.3%MC $82.61M

LeoGuigna: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-23 06:15 UTC

Holder addresses

1,502

Top 10 supply share

12.56%

Reported liquidity

$47,352.00
How concentrated is LeoGuigna ownership?
As of 2026-09-23 06:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 12.56% of supply. It reports 1,502 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling LeoGuigna?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-23 06:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $791,429.00 in buys and $742,887.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is LeoGuigna liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +274.39%, from $12,647.82 (2026-09-23 02:00 UTC) to $47,352.32 (2026-09-23 06:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-23 06:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-23 02:00 UTC$12,647.82
2026-09-23 03:00 UTC$14,961.08
2026-09-23 04:00 UTC$30,487.08
2026-09-23 05:00 UTC$43,877.39
2026-09-23 06:00 UTC$47,352.32

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about LeoGuigna

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 23, 06:16 AM UTC

FDV

$920,232

Liquidity

$47,352.00

Holders

1,502

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

LeoGuigna (LeoGuigna) is a newly-listed, highly volatile Solana token trading on PumpSwap that has surged +1831% in 24 hours to $0.00095, but operates with only $47.35K in total liquidity against a $920.23K fully diluted valuation, and carries multiple unresolved risk data gaps: mint/freeze authority status is unknown, sniper wallet data is entirely unavailable, and holder history is limited to a single current snapshot (1,502 holder addresses, 12.56% top-10 concentration).

Key points

  • Extreme, likely unsustainable 24h price appreciation (+1831%) with signs of exhaustion emerging in the most recent hourly candle
  • Very shallow liquidity ($47.35K) relative to both volume (>$1.5M combined 24h) and FDV (~$920K), creating high slippage/drain risk
  • Complete absence of sniper/bot analysis data, leaving early-buyer dump risk fully unquantified
  • Top-10 holder concentration of 12.56% (current snapshot only) appears comparatively moderate, though top-100 and historical concentration data are missing
  • Mint and freeze authority status entirely unverified, a material unresolved rug-risk gap

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

The most recent candle shows a rejection from a $0.00128 intraday high down to a $0.000952 close, alongside a ~64% drop in hourly volume, both signs of fading momentum after an extreme +1831% 24h parabolic run. A short-term pullback toward the $0.000825 or $0.000406 support zones is plausible unless fresh buying volume returns.

Target low

$0.000406

Target high

$0.00128

Support

$0.000825, $0.000406

Resistance

$0.00115, $0.00128

Medium term · 3-7 days

neutral

With only 5 hourly candles of history and no holder-trend or authority data, medium-term direction is highly uncertain. Sustainability depends on whether liquidity deepens beyond the current $47.35K and whether buy-side interest (currently 51.6% of volume) can be maintained without insider/sniper dumping — which cannot be verified from available data.

Catalysts

  • Potential liquidity additions to the PumpSwap pool
  • Social/community momentum tied to the wildcat brand narrative and social links (Twitter, website)
  • Resolution (or confirmation) of mint/freeze authority status, which could materially shift risk perception
  • Broader memecoin/pump.fun market sentiment shifts

Bullish factors

  • 24h buy volume ($791.43K) exceeds sell volume ($742.89K), a modest net positive skew
  • Unique buyers (4,914) slightly exceed unique sellers (4,694) in the 24h window
  • Top-10 holder concentration (12.56%) appears moderate relative to many new pump.fun tokens, per the current snapshot

Bearish factors

  • Extreme parabolic move (+1831% 24h) is inherently unsustainable and prone to sharp mean reversion
  • Long upper wick and close well below intraday high in the most recent candle signals seller pressure at highs
  • Volume declined ~64% in the latest hourly candle, suggesting waning buyer conviction
  • Liquidity of only $47.35K is very shallow relative to volume and FDV, amplifying downside volatility
  • Unresolved mint/freeze authority status and absent sniper data leave dump/dilution risk fully unquantified

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because the dataset spans only 5 hourly candles (an extremely short observation window), no holder history or sniper data exists to corroborate on-chain behavior, and mint/freeze authority status is entirely unverified. Any price projection is necessarily speculative given these substantial data gaps and the token's demonstrated extreme volatility.

LeoGuigna call history

Full track record →

Sep 23bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
AgxyNj...pump
Total Supply
966,725,293.35

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($47.35K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and drain risk
  • Parabolic, likely unsustainable price action (+1831% in 24h) with signs of exhaustion (long upper wick, declining volume on latest candle)
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out supply inflation or account freezing
  • No sniper data available, so early bot/insider dumping risk is unquantified and unmitigated

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Across the 5 most recent hourly candles (02:00-06:00 UTC on 2026-09-23), the token exhibits a parabolic uptrend: candle 1 opened at $0.00000587 and closed at $0.0000768 (a >1200% move within the hour), candle 2 continued higher to close at $0.000101, candle 3 surged to a high of $0.000652 before closing at $0.000406, candle 4 pushed to a high of $0.00115 closing at $0.000825, and candle 5 (most recent) opened at $0.000825, hit a high of $0.00128, then pulled back to close at $0.000952. Each candle shows progressively higher highs and higher closes, though candle 5's pullback from its high ($0.00128) to its close ($0.000952) suggests some profit-taking / resistance emerging near the $0.0012-0.0013 zone.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Both short-term (hourly) and the limited medium-term view show a strong uptrend with sequential higher highs and higher closes across all 5 candles, consistent with the reported 24h price change of +1831%. However, only 5 data points are available, so the 'medium-term' read is really just an extension of the same short intraday window and should not be treated as a mature trend.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

52%

Sell

48%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000825 (candle 4 open / candle 5 open level)

Major support

$0.000406 (candle 3 close)

Immediate resistance

$0.00128 (candle 5 intraday high)

Major resistance

$0.00115 (candle 4 intraday high, though already breached intra-candle by candle 5)

Support levels are inferred from prior candle opens/closes that acted as consolidation points during the ascent ($0.000825 and $0.000406). Resistance is defined by the most recent intraday high of $0.00128 (candle 5), with a secondary resistance zone around $0.00115 (candle 4's high) that was already tested and broken. Given the extremely limited 5-candle dataset, these levels are provisional and could be invalidated quickly given the token's demonstrated volatility.

Notable patterns

  • Parabolic/vertical price ascent across consecutive candles (higher highs, higher lows)
  • Long upper wick on the most recent candle (candle 5: high $0.00128 vs close $0.000952) suggesting seller pressure / profit-taking near highs
  • Declining volume on the latest candle despite price still up materially, a potential early bearish divergence signal

Liquidity

Liquidity

$47,352.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $47.35K is extremely shallow relative to a 24h trading volume exceeding $1.53M combined (buy+sell) and a fully diluted valuation of ~$920K. This liquidity-to-volume ratio (roughly 3%) indicates that large trades will experience significant slippage, and the pool could be drained or severely imbalanced by a handful of large sell orders. Buy volume ($791.43K, 51.6%) modestly exceeds sell volume ($742.89K, 48.4%), producing a mild net inflow bias, and unique buyers (4,914) slightly outnumber unique sellers (4,694), consistent with the token's sharp price ascent. However, given the tiny liquidity base, this volume level is likely inflated by rapid in-and-out trading (churn) typical of newly launched pump.fun-style tokens rather than deep, stable market participation.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

966,725,293.35

FDV

$920.23K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    The token moved over +1831% in 24h and exhibited a >16,000% intra-window swing across just 5 hourly candles, with the most recent candle already showing a ~26% pullback from its intraday high. This is extreme, casino-like volatility typical of very early-stage pump.fun-style tokens.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $47.35K against a 24h combined trading volume over $1.5M and an FDV of ~$920K. This shallow liquidity pool means large trades can cause severe slippage and the pool is vulnerable to rapid drain by concentrated selling.

  • Concentrationunknown

    Top-10 holders control 12.56% of supply per the current snapshot, which is a data point, but top-100 concentration, wallet classification (team/insider/exchange/bot), and any historical concentration trend are unavailable. Without this context, true concentration risk (e.g., whether top holders are coordinated insiders) cannot be reliably assessed.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($47.35K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and drain risk
  • Parabolic, likely unsustainable price action (+1831% in 24h) with signs of exhaustion (long upper wick, declining volume on latest candle)
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out supply inflation or account freezing
  • No sniper data available, so early bot/insider dumping risk is unquantified and unmitigated
  • No holder history, meaning any apparent distribution could reverse rapidly without warning
  • Very new/thin trading history (only 5 hourly candles observed) limits confidence in any technical read

Mitigating factors

  • Top-10 concentration (12.56%) is lower than many comparable freshly launched tokens, based on the current snapshot alone
  • 24h buy/sell volume is fairly balanced (51.6%/48.4%), not showing one-sided panic selling
  • Unique buyer count (4,914) modestly exceeds unique seller count (4,694) in the 24h window

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders comfortable with total capital loss; not appropriate for risk-averse investors, retirement allocations, or anyone unable to monitor positions closely given the token's extreme volatility, thin liquidity, and multiple unresolved data gaps (authority status, sniper activity, holder history).

LeoGuigna is a brand-new, extremely volatile pump.fun-derived token (trading on PumpSwap) that has posted a parabolic +1831% 24h gain on the back of thin liquidity ($47.35K) and heavy but roughly balanced trading volume. Critical risk data — mint/freeze authority status, sniper activity, and holder history — is entirely unavailable, making this a high-uncertainty, high-risk speculative asset rather than an investable thesis with verifiable fundamentals.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued speculative momentum and social/community attention (leveraging its Twitter/website presence and the 'Leopardus guigna' wildlife narrative) attracts fresh buyers, sustaining or extending the parabolic move, especially if buy pressure (currently 51.6% of volume) persists and liquidity providers add depth.

  • Sustained social media/community virality around the wildcat theme
  • Continued net-positive buyer/seller ratio (4,914 buyers vs 4,694 sellers in 24h)
  • Fresh liquidity inflows deepening the currently shallow $47.35K pool
  • Momentum traders chasing the move before any confirmed reversal

Base Case

The token continues to exhibit high volatility in both directions without a clear sustained trend, churning within a wide range as early speculators rotate in and out, with liquidity remaining a persistent constraint on price stability.

  • No major liquidity injection occurs in the near term
  • No confirmation is obtained on mint/freeze authority status
  • Trading remains dominated by short-term speculative flows rather than long-term holders
  • Price continues to be highly reactive to relatively small trade sizes given the $47.35K liquidity depth

Bear Case

High probability

The parabolic rally exhausts itself as seen in the emerging long upper wick and declining volume on the latest candle; profit-taking accelerates, and the shallow $47.35K liquidity pool cannot absorb sell pressure, leading to a sharp price collapse back toward earlier support levels ($0.000406 or lower).

  • Textbook exhaustion pattern: high wick rejection at $0.00128 followed by close well below the high
  • Volume declining ~64% in the most recent hourly candle despite price still elevated
  • Extremely thin liquidity relative to volume, amplifying downside moves once selling accelerates
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority and sniper data remove any assurance against insider dumping or supply dilution

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 23, 06:16 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-23 06:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
  • USD price feed and 24h price change
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (5 most recent candles) from PumpSwap pair
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count, top-10 concentration)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 5 hourly candles were available, providing a very narrow technical analysis window insufficient for robust trend confirmation
  • No sniper data was available at all, preventing assessment of early bot/insider activity and dump risk
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) was available, only a single current snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration
  • Top-100 holder concentration and wallet classification data were not provided
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, verified-contract status, and mutability flags were all unknown, preventing rug-risk verification from authorities
  • Token metadata (name, description, social links) originates from the token creator and is inherently unverified/potentially promotional or adversarial

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided, which contains significant gaps (authority status, sniper activity, holder history). The token shows characteristics of an extremely early-stage, highly volatile, low-liquidity speculative asset. Any investment decision should involve independent verification of contract authorities, liquidity depth, and holder behavior, and should account for the potential for total loss of capital.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is LeoGuigna ownership?

As of 2026-09-23 06:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 12.56% of supply. It reports 1,502 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling LeoGuigna?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-23 06:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $791,429.00 in buys and $742,887.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is LeoGuigna liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +274.39%, from $12,647.82 (2026-09-23 02:00 UTC) to $47,352.32 (2026-09-23 06:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for LeoGuigna (LeoGuigna)?

The most recent candle shows a rejection from a $0.00128 intraday high down to a $0.000952 close, alongside a ~64% drop in hourly volume, both signs of fading momentum after an extreme +1831% 24h parabolic run. A short-term pullback toward the $0.000825 or $0.000406 support zones is plausible unless fresh buying volume returns. Short-term outlook is bearish (1-24 hours), with a target range of $0.000406 to $0.00128.

Is LeoGuigna a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders comfortable with total capital loss; not appropriate for risk-averse investors, retirement allocations, or anyone unable to monitor positions closely given the token's extreme volatility, thin liquidity, and multiple unresolved data gaps (authority status, sniper activity, holder history).

What are the key risks of holding LeoGuigna?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($47.35K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and drain risk • Parabolic, likely unsustainable price action (+1831% in 24h) with signs of exhaustion (long upper wick, declining volume on latest candle) • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out supply inflation or account freezing

← Back to all predictions

Track LeoGuigna