copecat Price Today & AI Analysis

Q: Is cope a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced DeFi traders who fully understand the risks of micro-cap meme tokens, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of performing independent on-chain due diligence. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone investing more than a negligible speculative allocation. The combination of data anomalies, shallow liquidity, sell-side dominance, and missing holder/sniper data makes this one of the highest-risk token profiles possible.

Q: What are the key risks of holding cope?

Holder data anomaly: 828 holders appearing in <24h after 30 days of stagnation at 14 — possible bot/wash activity • No top holder transparency — cannot assess insider or team dump risk • Heavy sell-side dominance: 66.6% sell pressure, 985 sellers vs 484 buyers

copeSolanaAnalysis as of Jul 17, 2026

$0.0₅4342

-2.68% 24h

Contract

Live

AjBgThd5o37Q59sCw4AkQL7oRKo39APNGvCYiNvgpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

288

Market cap

$4,340

At a $1M market cap, $COPE would be $0.001001 (230x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Ask Unhosted AI about cope

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

DEGSDegs On Silver$0.0₅1923-98.4%MC $1.9K

QUANTUMQuantumCoin$0.0₅3214-4.9%MC $3.1K

GranularGranular$0.0₅2437-14.2%MC $2.4K

MOONDENGMOONDENG$0.0₅4310-4.0%MC $4.3K

PAYDAYPAYDAY$0.0₅3484-1.6%MC $3.3K

PUMPPump$0.004506-4.0%MC $1.60B

copecat: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-17 17:17 UTC

Holder addresses

842

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$39,837.48

How concentrated is copecat ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 842 addresses (2026-07-17 17:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling copecat?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is copecat liquidity falling?: As of 2026-07-17 17:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $39,837.48. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-17 17:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 17, 05:17 PM UTC

FDV

$96,407

Liquidity

$39,837.48

Holders

842

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

copecat (COPE) is a Solana meme token launched on PumpSwap with a total supply of 1,000,000,000 tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$96.4K. The token is extremely early-stage and exhibits several major data anomalies: the historical holder series shows only 14 holders for the entire 30-day lookback period, yet the current holder count is reported as 842 — a discrepancy of +828 holders (98%) appearing within the last 24 hours. This is a significant red flag suggesting either a data pipeline issue or a sudden, suspicious spike in wallet activity. Trading analytics show heavy sell-side dominance (66.6% sell pressure, 2,808 sells vs 1,117 buys), shallow liquidity ($39.84K), and a 40.7% 24h price gain that appears inconsistent with the reported 0% change across all shorter timeframes. Top holder data is unavailable, and sniper data is absent. Overall risk is very high.

Key points

Extreme holder anomaly: 828 new holders (98% of total) appeared within the last 24h per metrics, yet historical daily data shows only 14 holders for the prior 30 days
Heavy sell-side dominance: 66.6% sell pressure with 2,808 sells vs 1,117 buys in 24h
Very shallow liquidity at $39.84K against a $96.4K FDV — liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~41%
Price change data is internally inconsistent: 40.7% 24h gain reported but 0% shown across 5m/1h/6h/24h timeframes
No top holder data, no sniper data, and no supply concentration metrics available — severely limits analytical confidence

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24–72 hours

bearish

The token is under heavy sell pressure (66.6% of 24h volume is sells, 985 unique sellers vs 484 buyers). The most recent hourly candle (17:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000573, spiked to $0.0001031, then closed sharply lower at $0.0000306 — a bearish shooting star / inverted hammer pattern indicating strong rejection at highs. With only $39.84K in liquidity, any continued selling could rapidly push price back toward recent lows near $0.0000284.

Target low

$0.0000280

Target high

$0.0001031

Support: $0.0000442 (candle [1] low), $0.0000284 (candle [2] low — recent floor)
Resistance: $0.0000718 (candle [2] high), $0.0001031 (candle [1] all-time visible high — strong rejection zone)

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

bearish

Without a meaningful holder base, credible project fundamentals, or improving buy/sell dynamics, medium-term price appreciation is unlikely. The token spent 30 days with only 14 holders before a sudden spike, suggesting organic community growth has not occurred. Sustained price appreciation requires growing demand, which is not evidenced in the data.

Catalysts

Viral meme traction driving organic buyer inflow
Influencer promotion increasing awareness
Improvement in buy/sell ratio above 50%
Liquidity deepening above $200K

Bullish factors

40.7% 24h price gain suggests recent momentum or a pump event
1,104 unique wallets active in 24h indicates some market interest
Liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~41% is relatively high for a micro-cap meme token
Mutable=false metadata reduces one vector of rug risk

Bearish factors

66.6% sell pressure — sellers outnumber buyers nearly 2.5:1 in transaction count
Bearish shooting star candle pattern on the most recent hourly close
Extremely shallow liquidity ($39.84K) creates high slippage risk
Holder data anomaly (828 holders appearing in <24h) is a major red flag
No top holder transparency — cannot assess concentration or insider risk
Price change inconsistency across timeframes undermines data reliability
Unverified contract with unknown update authority

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) missing top holder and sniper data, (2) internally inconsistent price change figures (40.7% 24h vs 0% across all sub-24h windows), (3) only 2 OHLC candles available for technical analysis, and (4) the holder anomaly making it impossible to assess true community size.

cope call history

Full track record →

Jul 17bearish@ $0.0000964

24h-62.9%

7d-76.9%

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: AjBgTh...pump
Total Supply: 1,000,000,000 COPE

Key Risks

Holder data anomaly: 828 holders appearing in <24h after 30 days of stagnation at 14 — possible bot/wash activity
No top holder transparency — cannot assess insider or team dump risk
Heavy sell-side dominance: 66.6% sell pressure, 985 sellers vs 484 buyers
Extremely shallow liquidity ($39.84K) with high slippage risk

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available. Candle [2] (16:00 UTC): O=$0.0000306, H=$0.0000718, L=$0.0000284, C=$0.0000562 — a bullish candle with a long lower wick indicating buying support at lows. Candle [1] (17:00 UTC): O=$0.0000573, H=$0.0001031, L=$0.0000442, C=$0.0000306 — a strongly bearish candle that opened near the prior close, spiked to $0.0001031 (a 79% intra-candle high), then closed near the low at $0.0000306. This is a classic bearish shooting star / inverted hammer at a local top, signaling strong rejection of higher prices and a likely reversal. Volume was $62.5K on candle [1] and $94.6K on candle [2], with higher volume on the bullish candle — though the subsequent rejection on candle [1] is the dominant signal.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

The short-term trend is bearish following the shooting star rejection at $0.0001031. The medium-term trend is effectively sideways/unknown given only 2 candles of data and 30 days of near-zero holder activity prior to the recent spike.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

33%

Sell

67%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000442 (candle [1] low)

Major support

$0.0000284 (candle [2] low — recent floor)

Immediate resistance

$0.0000718 (candle [2] high)

Major resistance

$0.0001031 (candle [1] spike high — strong rejection zone)

The $0.0001031 level represents a major resistance zone where price was sharply rejected. The $0.0000284 level is the most recent significant low and acts as near-term major support. A break below $0.0000284 would suggest further downside with no visible support below.

Notable patterns

Bearish shooting star / inverted hammer on candle [1] — strong rejection at $0.0001031 high
Bullish lower wick on candle [2] suggesting demand at $0.0000284
Spike-and-reversal pattern consistent with pump-and-dump dynamics
Price closed candle [1] below candle [2] open — bearish engulfing-like structure

Liquidity

$39,837.48

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is extremely shallow at $39.84K on a single PumpSwap pool (6753JSgdEKmj6k3vzvNSv8nVg1d73eab8Lh1ymhG6tut). The FDV-to-liquidity ratio is approximately 2.4:1 ($96.4K FDV / $39.84K liquidity), meaning any moderate sell order could cause significant price impact. Slippage risk is high — even a $5K sell order could move price by 10%+ given the pool depth. Net flow is clearly negative: sell volume ($121.1K) is nearly double buy volume ($60.7K), and unique sellers (985) outnumber unique buyers (484) by 2:1. This indicates net capital outflow and distribution pressure. The 24h volume of ~$181.8K is approximately 4.6x the total liquidity, indicating very high turnover relative to pool size — a hallmark of speculative meme token trading. Market health is poor.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1,000,000,000 COPE

FDV

$96,407

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
The token spiked ~238% intra-hour from $0.0000284 to $0.0001031 before reversing sharply to $0.0000306 — extreme intra-day volatility. A 40.7% 24h gain with heavy sell pressure suggests pump-and-dump dynamics.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $39.84K on a single PumpSwap pool. High slippage risk for any order above ~$1–2K. 24h volume of ~$181.8K is 4.6x the pool liquidity, indicating the pool is being rapidly drained and refilled.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Holder data anomaly: 828 holders appearing in <24h after 30 days of stagnation at 14 — possible bot/wash activity
No top holder transparency — cannot assess insider or team dump risk
Heavy sell-side dominance: 66.6% sell pressure, 985 sellers vs 484 buyers
Extremely shallow liquidity ($39.84K) with high slippage risk
Bearish shooting star candle pattern indicating price rejection at highs
Internally inconsistent price data (40.7% 24h gain vs 0% across all sub-24h windows)
Unverified contract with unknown authority status
No sniper data available — early buyer behavior cannot be assessed
Single liquidity pool on PumpSwap — no diversified market making

Mitigating factors

Token metadata is immutable (mutable=false), preventing post-launch metadata manipulation
Possible spam flag is false
Liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~41% is relatively high for a micro-cap meme token
1,104 unique wallets active in 24h shows some genuine market interest
Token is on PumpSwap, a known Solana DEX with some baseline legitimacy

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced DeFi traders who fully understand the risks of micro-cap meme tokens, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of performing independent on-chain due diligence. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone investing more than a negligible speculative allocation. The combination of data anomalies, shallow liquidity, sell-side dominance, and missing holder/sniper data makes this one of the highest-risk token profiles possible.

copecat (COPE) is a high-risk micro-cap meme token on Solana's PumpSwap with a $96.4K FDV. The token exhibits multiple red flags including a suspicious holder spike, heavy sell-side dominance, shallow liquidity, and missing critical data (top holders, sniper analysis, authority status). While the recent price pump (+40.7% 24h) and 1,104 unique active wallets show some speculative interest, the bearish technical setup and data anomalies make this a very high-risk proposition.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Viral meme traction drives sustained organic buyer inflow, liquidity deepens, and the token establishes a growing holder base. The 'copecat' meme resonates with crypto culture, attracting influencer attention and community formation. Buy/sell ratio improves above 50%, and price consolidates above $0.0000718 before attempting a new high.

Viral meme spread on crypto Twitter/X
Influencer or KOL promotion
Improvement in buy/sell ratio
Liquidity growth above $200K
Confirmed authority renouncement building trust

Base Case

The token experiences a post-pump consolidation and gradual decline as sell pressure continues to outpace buying. Price drifts between $0.0000284 and $0.0000718 with declining volume. The holder base stabilizes but does not grow meaningfully. The token remains a low-liquidity micro-cap with no clear catalyst for sustained appreciation.

Sell pressure remains elevated but does not cause a complete liquidity drain
No major new catalysts emerge (no influencer promotion, no viral moment)
Liquidity stays in the $20K–$50K range
Holder count stabilizes around current levels without further anomalous spikes

Bear Case

High probability

The recent price pump was a coordinated pump-and-dump. Early holders and insiders continue distributing into buy pressure. Liquidity drains, the holder spike proves to be bot activity, and price collapses back toward or below the $0.0000284 recent low. The token becomes illiquid and effectively abandoned.

Continued sell-side dominance (66.6% sell pressure)
Holder anomaly suggesting artificial activity
Bearish shooting star rejection at $0.0001031
Shallow liquidity unable to absorb selling pressure
No verified fundamentals or community infrastructure

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 17, 05:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-17 17:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

Moralis on-chain token metadata API
PumpSwap DEX trading analytics
Hourly OHLC price data (2 candles)
Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
Trading volume and buyer/seller analytics
Top holder endpoint (returned no data)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Only 2 OHLC candles available — technical analysis is severely limited and patterns identified are based on minimal data
Top holder data is entirely unavailable — whale map and concentration analysis are based on assumptions, not actual data
Sniper analysis data is unavailable — smart money signals cannot be properly assessed
Holder data contains a major anomaly (828 holders in <24h after 30 days at 14) that undermines the reliability of holder metrics
Price change data is internally inconsistent (40.7% 24h vs 0% across all sub-24h windows) — one or more data feeds may be stale or erroneous
Mint and freeze authority status are unknown — tokenomics risk cannot be fully assessed
Supply concentration metrics (top10=0%, top100=0%) appear to be data artifacts rather than genuine figures
Update authority is listed as 'unknown' — cannot confirm renouncement status
Single liquidity pool with shallow depth limits price discovery reliability

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data used contains multiple anomalies and gaps that significantly reduce analytical confidence. Always conduct your own due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. Past price performance does not guarantee future results.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is copecat ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 842 addresses (2026-07-17 17:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling copecat?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is copecat liquidity falling?

As of 2026-07-17 17:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $39,837.48. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for copecat (cope)?

Is cope a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced DeFi traders who fully understand the risks of micro-cap meme tokens, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of performing independent on-chain due diligence. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone investing more than a negligible speculative allocation. The combination of data anomalies, shallow liquidity, sell-side dominance, and missing holder/sniper data makes this one of the highest-risk token profiles possible.

What are the key risks of holding cope?

Holder data anomaly: 828 holders appearing in <24h after 30 days of stagnation at 14 — possible bot/wash activity • No top holder transparency — cannot assess insider or team dump risk • Heavy sell-side dominance: 66.6% sell pressure, 985 sellers vs 484 buyers