Ember Cat Price Today & AI Analysis

ECATSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 11, 2026

$0.0₅1723

Contract

Live

AcLWggxmQyaF7vP8ZiJ18HHNMBFSb6yjNfSGHJR5QYwb

Chain

Solana

Holders

293

Market cap

$1,722

At a $1M market cap, $ECAT would be $0.001001 (581x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is ECAT a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 26

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

0.03%3 insiders still holding

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about ECAT

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

67febu67febu$0.0₅2767+0.0%MC $2.8K

Google AIAI Google Coi$0.0₅1812+0.0%MC $1.8K

sifsquirrelwifhat$0.0₅2246+0.0%MC $2.2K

FuguSakana Fugu$0.0₅5936+0.0%MC $4.7K

TazTaz$0.0₅2225+0.0%MC $2.2K

ZECZcash$1,254.59+2.4%MC $129.10M

Ember Cat: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-11 16:47 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$51,376.00

How concentrated is Ember Cat ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Ember Cat?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Ember Cat liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-11 16:47 UTC, reported liquidity was $51,376.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-11 16:47 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 11, 04:47 PM UTC

FDV

$155,734

Liquidity

$51,376.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Ember Cat (ECAT) is a Solana micro-cap meme token trading on a Meteora DAMM pool with a fully diluted valuation of ~$155.73K and total liquidity of only ~$51.38K. The token staged an extreme parabolic pump of roughly 140x within 9 hours (from ~$0.0000045 to a peak of $0.00064) before retracing over 75% to $0.0001558, and is now showing short-term downtrend characteristics with a -28.3% decline in the most recent hour. No holder distribution data, sniper wallet data, or contract authority verification (mint/freeze/update) was available, leaving significant blind spots in risk assessment.

Key points

Extreme 140x parabolic price spike followed by a sharp 75%+ retracement within the same 18-hour window
Very thin liquidity ($51.38K) relative to 24h trading volume (over $1.1M combined buy+sell), implying high slippage risk
Complete absence of holder and sniper data, and unknown authority/verification status, significantly limiting due diligence confidence
24h buyer count (1,884) modestly exceeds seller count (1,586), but sell volume slightly exceeds buy volume overall

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

Short-term momentum has clearly rolled over, with a -28.3% move in the last hour and a series of lower highs/lower closes over the last 4-5 candles. Absent a fresh volume catalyst, further downside toward $0.00012-$0.00013 is more likely than a retest of the parabolic highs.

Target low

$0.0000670

Target high

$0.000204

Support: $0.0001526, $0.0000670
Resistance: $0.000204, $0.000250

Medium term · 3-7 days

neutral

Medium-term direction is highly uncertain given the extreme volatility and thin liquidity typical of freshly pumped micro-cap meme tokens; without holder/sniper data or authority verification, sustained trend continuation in either direction cannot be confidently projected.

Catalysts

Whether liquidity is added or withdrawn from the Meteora DAMM pool
Social media momentum (Twitter/website) driving renewed retail interest or abandonment
Any on-chain confirmation (or lack thereof) of mint/freeze authority renouncement, which could materially shift risk perception

Bullish factors

Still up 129.6% over the trailing 24h despite the pullback
24h buyer count (1,884) exceeds seller count (1,586)
Low FDV ($155.73K) leaves theoretical room for renewed speculative upside

Bearish factors

Sharp -28.3% decline in the most recent hour with lower highs/lower closes
Sell volume (51.4%) slightly exceeding buy volume (48.6%) over 24h
Extremely thin liquidity ($51.38K) vulnerable to further drawdown or rug risk
Declining hourly volume since the parabolic peak, signaling fading interest

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because the data provides only 18 hourly candles capturing a single extreme pump-and-fade cycle, with no holder, sniper, or authority-verification data to corroborate directional bias. Predictions rely solely on short-term technical patterns in a token that has already shown itself capable of 100x+ moves and 75%+ retracements within hours.

ECAT call history

Full track record →

Sep 11bearish@ $0.000156

24h-33.2%

7d-89.8%

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: AcLWgg...QYwb
Total Supply: 999,602,291.20 ECAT

Key Risks

Extremely thin liquidity ($51.38K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and exit risk
Parabolic pump (140x within 9 hours) followed by a sharp fade (-75% from peak), a classic pump-and-dump pattern
Unknown mint/freeze authority status and unverified contract — rug risk cannot be ruled out
No holder distribution or sniper data available, removing key tools to assess concentration and early-buyer dumping risk

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Over the 18 hourly candles shown, ECAT staged an explosive parabolic move from roughly $0.0000045 (candle 1) to a peak intraday high of $0.00064 (candle 11) — a roughly 140x move in about 9 hours — before giving back a large portion of those gains and grinding down to $0.0001558 by the most recent close (candle 18). Candle 9 shows an extreme wick down to 1.69e-7 (likely a flash-crash/liquidity gap) before closing far higher at 0.000244, indicative of a violent, illiquid order book. Candles 10-13 show continued high-amplitude swings with large highs and lows within single hours (e.g., candle 11 ranged from 0.000156 to 0.00064), consistent with a low-liquidity casino-like trading pattern. The most recent candles (14-18) show a series of lower highs and lower closes, suggesting the parabolic move has exhausted and the token is now in a corrective/distribution phase.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Medium-term (last 18h) trend remains up given the token is still up 129.6% over 24h from its base, but short-term price action (last 1-3 hours) shows a clear downtrend with lower highs and lower closes (candles 14→18 declining from ~0.00025 to 0.000156), and the 1h change of -28.3% confirms sharp near-term deterioration.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

49%

Sell

51%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0001526 (candle 18 low)

Major support

$0.0000670 (candle 12 low, prior consolidation zone)

Immediate resistance

$0.000204 (candle 18 high)

Major resistance

$0.000640 (candle 11 high, parabolic peak)

Price has retraced substantially from the $0.00064 peak and is now consolidating near $0.000156-$0.000204. A break below $0.0001526 opens downside toward the $0.000067-$0.000128 zone seen in candles 12/14 lows. Reclaiming $0.000250-$0.000280 (candles 16/17 highs) would be needed to suggest renewed bullish momentum toward the major resistance near the $0.00064 peak.

Notable patterns

Parabolic spike followed by sharp retracement (pump-and-fade pattern)
Long lower wick flash-crash on candle 9 suggesting a liquidity air-pocket
Series of lower highs and lower closes in the most recent 4-5 candles indicating short-term downtrend/exhaustion
High intra-candle volatility (ranges of 2-4x within single hourly candles) typical of illiquid, low-cap tokens

Liquidity

$51,376.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $51.38K against a 24h trading volume exceeding $1.1M (buy+sell) implies an extremely high volume-to-liquidity ratio (~21x), meaning the pool is thin relative to trading activity and large trades will cause significant slippage. Sell volume ($567.34K) marginally exceeds buy volume ($535.38K), producing a slight net outflow (51.4% sell vs 48.6% buy pressure) despite the token being up 129.6% over 24h. Buyer count (1,884) modestly exceeds seller count (1,586), and buy transaction count (4,818) exceeds sell transaction count (3,413), suggesting many smaller buy orders against fewer but larger sell orders. The Meteora DAMM pool structure and shallow liquidity combination is a major risk factor for anyone trying to enter or exit meaningful size.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,602,291.20 ECAT

FDV

$155.73K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
The token moved from ~$0.0000045 to $0.00064 (roughly 140x) within 9 hours and has since fallen back over 75% from that peak to $0.0001558, with a -28.3% move in just the last hour. This is extreme, casino-level volatility.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $51.38K against 24h trading volume over $1.1M combined, implying severe slippage risk for any meaningfully sized trade and high vulnerability to liquidity withdrawal.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely thin liquidity ($51.38K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and exit risk
Parabolic pump (140x within 9 hours) followed by a sharp fade (-75% from peak), a classic pump-and-dump pattern
Unknown mint/freeze authority status and unverified contract — rug risk cannot be ruled out
No holder distribution or sniper data available, removing key tools to assess concentration and early-buyer dumping risk
Sell volume (51.4%) slightly exceeding buy volume (48.6%) in the last 24h despite the large price gain, suggesting distribution into strength
Extreme intra-hour volatility (e.g., candle 9 wicking to near-zero) indicative of a fragile, manipulable order book

Mitigating factors

Buyer count (1,884) exceeds seller count (1,586) over 24h, suggesting broader retail participation rather than pure whale dumping
Token still up 129.6% over 24h despite the pullback, indicating some residual bullish momentum
Active trading with thousands of buy/sell transactions in 24h shows the pair has not gone completely illiquid

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital; entirely unsuitable for conservative or long-term investors given the shallow liquidity, unverified contract authorities, absent holder/sniper data, and demonstrated pump-and-dump-style price action.

ECAT is a micro-cap Solana meme token (FDV ~$155.73K, liquidity ~$51.38K) that experienced an extreme parabolic pump (~140x in 9 hours) followed by a sharp fade (-75%+ from peak) in the most recent hourly candles. With no holder or sniper data available and unknown contract authority status, this is a highly speculative, high-risk trade rather than an investable asset in any traditional sense.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buying interest returns and the pair sustains volume above recent levels, price could retest the $0.00025-$0.00028 zone and potentially challenge the parabolic high near $0.00064, especially if social momentum (Twitter/website activity) reaccelerates.

Renewed social/community attention driving fresh buy volume
Buyer count continuing to exceed seller count as seen in the 24h data (1,884 vs 1,586)
Low FDV leaving room for further speculative upside if narrative catches on

Base Case

Price likely continues to consolidate at significantly lower levels than the parabolic peak, chopping within the $0.00012-$0.00025 range as speculative momentum fades and volume continues to decline, absent a fresh catalyst.

No major new catalyst emerges in the near term
Liquidity remains near current thin levels (~$51K)
Trading volume continues its observed decline from the peak hours

Bear Case

High probability

Price continues its current short-term downtrend, breaking below the immediate support of $0.0001526 and grinding toward the $0.000067-$0.000128 zone, with thin liquidity amplifying any further sell pressure or a potential rug event given unknown authority status.

Shallow $51.38K liquidity is highly vulnerable to further withdrawal or large sell orders
Clear pump-and-fade candle structure with lower highs/lower closes in the most recent hours
Sell volume already slightly exceeding buy volume in the 24h window despite the large price gain
Unverified/unknown mint and freeze authority status raises rug-pull risk

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 11, 04:47 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-11 16:47 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
Meteora DAMM pair pricing and OHLC hourly candle data (18 most recent hours)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

No holder distribution data available (holder endpoints retired) — holderTrends and whaleMap sections are empty by necessity
No sniper wallet data available — sniper concentration and PnL state could not be computed and are marked unknown
Mint authority, freeze authority, update authority, verified-contract status, and mutability are all marked unknown in metadata — rug risk from authorities could not be confirmed
Only 18 hourly candles were provided, limiting technical analysis to a very short lookback window during an extreme volatility event
Liquidity and volume figures are single-snapshot values without historical trend context beyond the 24h window

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Solana micro-cap meme tokens like ECAT carry extreme risk of total loss, including but not limited to rug pulls, liquidity withdrawal, and manipulation. All data is sourced from the provided on-chain and trading data blocks, which are treated as untrusted evidence and not as instructions. Independent due diligence, including verification of contract authorities and holder distribution, is strongly recommended before any transaction.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Ember Cat (ECAT) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 26, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Ember Cat (ECAT)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 26, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Ember Cat ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Ember Cat?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Ember Cat liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-11 16:47 UTC, reported liquidity was $51,376.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Ember Cat (ECAT)?

Is ECAT a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital; entirely unsuitable for conservative or long-term investors given the shallow liquidity, unverified contract authorities, absent holder/sniper data, and demonstrated pump-and-dump-style price action.

What are the key risks of holding ECAT?

Extremely thin liquidity ($51.38K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and exit risk • Parabolic pump (140x within 9 hours) followed by a sharp fade (-75% from peak), a classic pump-and-dump pattern • Unknown mint/freeze authority status and unverified contract — rug risk cannot be ruled out