TURTLES

I LIKE TURTLES Price Today & AI Analysis

TURTLES
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 31, 2026

9tiJwmvYbNgpJ4s1MWUndmETDgx93nsEi4yVL4vXpump

$0.053576

FDV $3,497

LiveContract:9tiJwmvYbNgpJ4s1MWUndmETDgx93nsEi4yVL4vXpumpChain:SolanaHolders:202Market cap:$3,497

More tokens on Solana

ROKO

ROKO

Basilisk Experiment

$0.0529503.1%
MC $2.8K
CAPO

CAPO

CAPO

$0.0522990.0%
MC $2.3K
Kelsey

Kelsey

The Solo Rower

$0.0525890.4%
MC $2.6K
susdog

susdog

susdog

$0.0534460.1%
MC $3.3K
CATTEARS

CATTEARS

CATTEARS

$0.0535440.0%
MC $3.5K
STONK

STONK

STONK

$0.303648.5%
MC $258.92M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about TURTLES

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jul 31, 06:17 AM
FDV

$105,967

Liquidity

$39,810

Holders

27

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

TURTLES (I LIKE TURTLES) is an extremely new Solana meme token launched on PumpSwap, with only 27 holders and a fully diluted valuation of ~$105K. The token was deployed via j7tracker.io and has existed for roughly 2 days based on historical holder data. It has experienced a massive 186% 24h price surge, but this is accompanied by overwhelming sell pressure (70.8%), very thin liquidity ($39.81K), and a critically small holder base. The token is unverified, the update authority is unknown, and top holder data is unavailable — all significant red flags for a token of this age and size.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Extremely new token (~2 days old) with only 27 holders
186%+ 24h price spike driven by speculative trading, not organic adoption
Severe sell pressure: 70.8% of 24h volume is sells (2,422 sells vs 1,072 buys)
Critically thin liquidity at $39.81K — high slippage risk for any meaningful position
Top holder data unavailable, making concentration risk impossible to quantify directly
Deployed via j7tracker.io — unverified contract, unknown update authority

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token has spiked 186% in 24h and is showing a 79.5% gain in the last hour alone, but sell pressure dominates at 70.8% of volume. The most recent candle (Candle 1: O $0.0000855, H $0.000120, C $0.000106) shows a rejection from the $0.000120 high. With only 27 holders and $39.81K liquidity, any moderate sell order could collapse the price rapidly. Short-term outlook is bearish as profit-taking is likely.

Target low$0.000022
Target high$0.000130
Support: $0.0000709 (Candle 1 low), $0.0000229 (Candle 2 low), $0.0000179 (Candle 3 low / all-time low in data)
Resistance: $0.000120 (Candle 1 high), $0.000130 (Candle 2 all-time high in data)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

With only 27 holders, no verified contract, unknown update authority, and no evidence of community growth beyond the initial 28-wallet launch cohort, medium-term sustainability is highly questionable. Unless significant new buyer interest materializes and liquidity deepens substantially, the token is likely to fade. Meme tokens of this profile typically retrace 80–99% from peak within weeks.

Catalysts
  • Viral social media traction (Twitter/website links present but unverified)
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Listing on aggregators or DEX screeners driving discovery
  • Liquidity deepening via new LP providers

Bullish factors

  • 186% 24h price surge demonstrates speculative demand exists
  • Price making higher highs across all 3 candles (H: $0.0000636 → $0.000130 → $0.000120)
  • Active trading with 773 unique wallets in 24h despite only 27 holders (suggests external traders)
  • Social links (Twitter, website) present indicating some promotional effort
  • 5m price change of +19.9% and 1h of +79.5% show very recent momentum

Bearish factors

  • 70.8% sell pressure — sellers vastly outnumber buyers (2,422 sells vs 1,072 buys)
  • Only 27 holders — extremely thin base with zero growth in last 24h
  • Liquidity of only $39.81K makes the token highly vulnerable to price manipulation
  • Top holder data unavailable — concentration risk cannot be assessed
  • Unverified contract, unknown update authority — rug risk is elevated
  • Token is only ~2 days old with no track record
  • 6h and 24h price change reported as 0% in analytics (data inconsistency suggests possible reporting lag or manipulation)
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: only 3 hourly candles of price history, 27 total holders, no top holder data, no sniper data, unknown update authority, and extreme volatility. The data set is too thin to make reliable medium-term predictions.

TURTLES call history

Full track record →
Jul 31bearish
24h-17.9%
7d-97.0%
30d-96.4%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available (Candles 3→2→1, oldest to newest). Candle 3 (04:00 UTC): O $0.0000306, H $0.0000636, L $0.0000179, C $0.0000396 — a bullish candle with a long upper wick indicating early buying with partial rejection. Candle 2 (05:00 UTC): O $0.0000385, H $0.000130, L $0.0000229, C $0.0000860 — an explosive bullish candle with a massive range ($0.000107 spread), closing near the midpoint, suggesting strong buying followed by significant profit-taking. Candle 3 (06:00 UTC): O $0.0000855, H $0.000120, L $0.0000709, C $0.000106 — a narrowing range candle that opened near Candle 2's close, reached a lower high than Candle 2 ($0.000120 vs $0.000130), and closed below the open of the candle — a potential bearish signal. The pattern shows a parabolic spike with diminishing momentum.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 29%Sell 71%

Short-term trend is technically up (price has risen from ~$0.0000179 low to current ~$0.000107), but the most recent candle shows a lower high vs Candle 2, and the close is below the open — early signs of trend exhaustion. Medium-term is sideways/unknown given only 2 days of existence.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000709 (Candle 1 low)
Major$0.0000179 (Candle 3 absolute low — launch-area support)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000120 (Candle 1 high)
Major$0.000130 (Candle 2 all-time high in available data)

The $0.000130 level represents the all-time high in available data and is the key resistance. Immediate support at $0.0000709 (Candle 1 low); a break below this opens the path to $0.0000229 (Candle 2 low) and ultimately $0.0000179 (Candle 3 low). Given thin liquidity, these levels can be breached rapidly.

Notable patterns

  • Higher highs across candles (H: $0.0000636 → $0.000130 → $0.000120) — but Candle 1 prints a lower high vs Candle 2, signaling potential trend exhaustion
  • Candle 2 is a massive bullish engulfing/spike candle with a long upper wick — classic pump-and-dump candle morphology
  • Candle 1 shows bearish close (C $0.000106 < O $0.0000855 is actually bullish open-to-close, but lower high than Candle 2 and declining volume = bearish divergence)
  • Volume climax in Candle 2 followed by sharp volume decline in Candle 1 — classic exhaustion pattern
  • Extremely wide candle wicks throughout suggest high volatility and low liquidity price discovery

Total holders27
24h Δ0
7d Δ+28
30d Δ+28
Accelerating Growth
No

Correlation with price

The entire holder base of 27 was established on 2026-07-29 (all 28 holders appeared in a single day, with 1 net loss since). Despite a 186% price surge in the last 24h, holder count has not increased at all (0% change in 24h). This is a deeply concerning divergence — price is pumping but no new holders are accumulating, suggesting the price action is driven by wash trading or rapid flip traders rather than genuine new investors.

The historical holder data shows the token went from 0 to 27 holders in a single day (2026-07-29), with zero growth since. The 30-day and 7-day growth figures are identical (28 holders, 100%), reflecting the single launch event. The 24h growth is 0 despite a massive price spike. This pattern — explosive price action with zero holder growth — is a major red flag consistent with coordinated pump activity by a small group of wallets rather than organic community growth.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

Top holder data unavailable — no top holders data returned by API

0.00%

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for this token. The API returned no top 20 holders, and supply concentration metrics show top10=0% and top100=0%, which likely reflects a data gap rather than true even distribution. With only 27 total holders and a token launched 2 days ago via PumpSwap, it is highly probable that a small number of wallets hold a disproportionate share of supply. The distribution health is classified as very_concentrated by inference given the tiny holder base, but this cannot be confirmed with the available data. Investors should treat the lack of holder transparency as a significant risk factor.

Liquidity$39,810
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$56,980
Sell$138,350
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers239
Unique sellers740

Liquidity is critically shallow at $39.81K on a single PumpSwap pair (DkSbGtbcryE7N7brK2pFtisSAinWquVPWcG4DWrVHfXN). The FDV of ~$105K means liquidity represents only ~38% of FDV — extremely thin. Any sell order above a few hundred dollars will incur significant slippage. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: $138.35K in sells vs $56.98K in buys — a net outflow of ~$81.37K. Sellers outnumber buyers 3:1 by unique wallet count (740 sellers vs 239 buyers). Despite 773 unique wallets trading, only 27 net holders remain, confirming that the vast majority of participants are day-traders or flippers who have already exited. Market health is poor.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply986,500,835.87 TURTLES
FDV$105,966.59

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is ~986.5 million TURTLES with an FDV of ~$105,967 at current prices. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and the contract is unverified. The token is marked as mutable=false and master edition=false. Because the update authority status is unknown (not confirmed as the burn address or explicitly renounced), mint and freeze authority status cannot be determined — both are marked unknown. This represents a meaningful rug risk vector. The token was deployed via j7tracker.io, a third-party deployment tool, which does not inherently indicate malicious intent but adds a layer of opacity. The unverified contract status means the code has not been audited or confirmed by any third party.

Volatility
high

186% 24h price surge with only 3 candles of history. Price ranged from $0.0000179 to $0.000130 within 2 hours — a 625% intracandle range. Extreme volatility is inherent to a token with $39.81K liquidity and 27 holders.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of only $39.81K on a single PumpSwap pool. Any position above ~$500 will face significant slippage. The pool could be drained or removed at any time.

Concentration
high

Only 27 holders total. Top holder data is unavailable, making it impossible to assess concentration directly, but with 27 holders the statistical likelihood of extreme concentration is very high. A single large holder exiting could collapse the price.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data available, but 70.8% sell pressure and 2,422 sells vs 1,072 buys across 740 unique sellers strongly suggests early participants are actively dumping. 773 unique wallets traded but only 27 remain as holders.

Authority
high

Update authority is 'unknown' — mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed as renounced. Unverified contract. Deployed via third-party tool j7tracker.io. These factors leave open the possibility of malicious authority actions.

Key risks

  • Rug pull risk: unknown update/mint/freeze authority status with unverified contract
  • Extreme illiquidity: $39.81K total liquidity makes large exits impossible without massive slippage
  • Holder concentration: only 27 holders, top holder data unavailable — likely extreme concentration
  • Sustained sell pressure: 70.8% of 24h volume is sells, net outflow of ~$81K
  • Zero holder growth in 24h despite 186% price spike — suggests artificial/coordinated price action
  • Token is only ~2 days old with no track record, no audit, no verified contract
  • Single liquidity pool on PumpSwap — LP can be removed at any time

Mitigating factors

  • Token is marked mutable=false which limits some metadata manipulation vectors
  • Social links (Twitter, website) present — some level of public accountability
  • FDV is small (~$105K) limiting absolute dollar loss exposure for small positions
  • 773 unique wallets traded in 24h showing some market awareness
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced DeFi traders who fully understand the risks of micro-cap meme tokens, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of executing rapid entries and exits with small position sizes. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose completely.

TURTLES is a 2-day-old Solana meme token with a $105K FDV, 27 holders, $39.81K liquidity, and a 186% 24h price spike driven overwhelmingly by sell-side activity. The token exhibits multiple hallmarks of a high-risk micro-cap pump: thin liquidity, unknown authorities, no verified contract, zero holder growth during the price spike, and 70.8% sell pressure. While short-term speculative momentum exists, the structural fundamentals are extremely weak.

Bull case (low)

Viral meme traction drives rapid holder growth and liquidity inflows. The 'I Like Turtles' meme has broad cultural recognition and could attract retail attention if promoted effectively on social media. A successful viral moment could push FDV to $500K–$1M+ range.

  • Viral social media campaign leveraging the well-known 'I Like Turtles' meme
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all micro-caps
  • Influencer promotion driving rapid holder growth from 27 to 1,000+
  • Liquidity deepening to $200K+ enabling larger position sizes

Base case

The token stabilizes at a fraction of its current price as the initial pump fades. It retains a small community of 50–100 holders but sees minimal trading activity and slow price decay over weeks.

  • No rug pull or LP removal in the near term
  • Some residual speculative interest keeps occasional trading alive
  • Price retraces 60–80% from current levels to the $0.000020–$0.000045 range
  • Holder count grows slowly to 50–100 but never achieves meaningful scale

Bear case (high)

The current price spike is the peak. Early holders dump remaining positions, liquidity is removed, and the token goes to near-zero. This is the most statistically likely outcome for tokens of this profile.

  • Continued 70.8%+ sell pressure exhausts buy-side liquidity
  • LP removal by pool creator collapses trading entirely
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority exploited for malicious action
  • No new holder growth means no new capital entering the ecosystem
  • Broader market downturn reduces appetite for micro-cap meme speculation

GeneratedJul 31, 06:17 AM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of analysis time. OHLC data covers only 3 hourly candles (04:00–06:00 UTC 2026-07-31). Historical holder data covers 30 days but token only has 2 days of actual activity. Sniper data unavailable.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (Mint: 9tiJwmvYbNgpJ4s1MWUndmETDgx93nsEi4yVL4vXpump)
  • PumpSwap DEX pair data (DkSbGtbcryE7N7brK2pFtisSAinWquVPWcG4DWrVHfXN)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (3 candles, 2026-07-31 04:00–06:00 UTC)
  • 24h trading analytics (volume, buys/sells, unique wallets)
  • Historical holder metrics (30-day daily series)
  • Holder distribution and acquisition data
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Top 20 holder data unavailable — whale concentration cannot be directly measured
  • Sniper analysis data unavailable — early buyer behavior cannot be assessed
  • Update authority status is 'unknown' — authority risk cannot be fully quantified
  • Token is only ~2 days old — no meaningful price history or trend data exists
  • 6h and 24h price change reported as 0% in analytics despite obvious price movement — possible data reporting inconsistency
  • Supply concentration shows top10=0% and top100=0% which likely reflects a data gap, not true distribution
  • All holder acquisitions are via swap/transfer — no airdrop data to assess distribution fairness

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed is from on-chain sources and third-party APIs which may contain errors or gaps. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply986,500,835.87 TURTLES

Key Risks

•Rug pull risk: unknown update/mint/freeze authority status with unverified contract
•Extreme illiquidity: $39.81K total liquidity makes large exits impossible without massive slippage
•Holder concentration: only 27 holders, top holder data unavailable — likely extreme concentration
•Sustained sell pressure: 70.8% of 24h volume is sells, net outflow of ~$81K

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper data is available for TURTLES. The token is only ~2 days old with 27 holders, all acquired via swap (26) or transfer (1). The 24h trading data shows 773 unique wallets trading despite only 27 holders, which suggests the majority of trading activity is from non-holding speculators (traders who buy and sell within the same period without net accumulation). The overwhelming sell pressure (70.8%) and 2,422 sells vs 1,072 buys suggests early participants are actively distributing.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available for this token.

Likely distributing — the 70.8% sell pressure and 2,422 sells vs 1,072 buys across 740 unique sellers vs 239 unique buyers strongly suggests early buyers are taking profits or cutting losses. With only 27 net holders remaining, many traders who entered during the spike have already exited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for I LIKE TURTLES (TURTLES)?

The token has spiked 186% in 24h and is showing a 79.5% gain in the last hour alone, but sell pressure dominates at 70.8% of volume. The most recent candle (Candle 1: O $0.0000855, H $0.000120, C $0.000106) shows a rejection from the $0.000120 high. With only 27 holders and $39.81K liquidity, any moderate sell order could collapse the price rapidly. Short-term outlook is bearish as profit-taking is likely. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000022 to $0.000130.

Is TURTLES a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced DeFi traders who fully understand the risks of micro-cap meme tokens, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of executing rapid entries and exits with small position sizes. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose completely.

How are TURTLES holders trending?

I LIKE TURTLES currently has 27 holders and is stable (24h: 0, 7d: 28, 30d: 28). The historical holder data shows the token went from 0 to 27 holders in a single day (2026-07-29), with zero growth since. The 30-day and 7-day growth figures are identical (28 holders, 100%), reflecting the single launch event. The 24h growth is 0 despite a massive price spike. This pattern — explosive price action with zero holder growth — is a major red flag consistent with coordinated pump activity by a small group of wallets rather than organic community growth.

What does sniper activity look like for TURTLES?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding TURTLES?

Rug pull risk: unknown update/mint/freeze authority status with unverified contract • Extreme illiquidity: $39.81K total liquidity makes large exits impossible without massive slippage • Holder concentration: only 27 holders, top holder data unavailable — likely extreme concentration

← Back to all predictions

Track TURTLES