FITNESS

Fit Coin Price Prediction 2026

FITNESS
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 23, 2026

9af7PmWRca2QYmknQehoLH19jG5ss9ajYFpgL8dMpump

$0.053719

+3.22%

FDV $3,718

LiveContract:9af7PmWRca2QYmknQehoLH19jG5ss9ajYFpgL8dMpumpChain:SolanaHolders:1,662Market cap:$3,718

More tokens on Solana

AyyLMAO

AyyLMAO

Ayy LMAO

$0.0563334.9%
MC $6.3K
Popus

Popus

Claude Popus 5

$0.0549190.9%
MC $3.8K
DUMACRATS

DUMACRATS

Dumacrats

$0.0529561.1%
MC $3.0K
bully

bully

bully

$0.0518060.0%
MC $1.8K
Gerald

Gerald

Gerald The Dolphin

$0.0543381.8%
MC $4.3K
arc

arc

AI Rig Complex

$0.060614.9%
MC $60.63M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about FITNESS

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jun 23, 09:17 PM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$53,594

Holders

750

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

FITNESS (Fit Coin) is a self-improvement-themed memecoin on Solana launched on PumpSwap (mint: 9af7PmWRca2QYmknQehoLH19jG5ss9ajYFpgL8dMpump). The token has a total formatted supply of 1 (likely a single NFT-style or fractional token), a current price of ~$0.000318, and a fully diluted valuation of ~$317.50K against only $53.59K in liquidity. The token experienced a dramatic holder surge in the last 24 hours (+722 holders, +96%), jumping from a flat base of 28 holders over the prior 30 days to 750 holders. Trading activity shows moderate sell pressure (52.1% sell vs 47.9% buy), with $608K in sell volume vs $560K in buy volume over 24h. The contract is unverified, mutable, and update authority is unknown — significant red flags. No top holder data, no sniper data, and no social links are available, limiting analytical depth considerably.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Explosive holder growth in a single day (+722 holders, +96%) after 30 days of complete stagnation at 28 holders
Very low liquidity ($53.59K) relative to FDV ($317.50K), creating high slippage risk
Unverified, mutable contract with unknown update authority — elevated rug risk
Extreme OHLC volatility: candle [1] shows a close of $0.0000128 vs open of $0.000301, a ~96% intracandle collapse, followed by partial recovery
No social links, no top holder data, and no sniper data available — very limited transparency

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–48 hours

The most recent hourly candle (candle [1]) closed at $0.0000128 — a ~96% collapse from its open of $0.000301 — before the current price recovered to ~$0.000318. This extreme intracandle volatility, combined with net sell pressure (52.1% sell volume, 940 sells vs 441 buys), and a -9.84% 1h price change, suggests continued short-term downside risk. The 5m change of -1.29% confirms ongoing selling. With only $53.59K in liquidity, any moderate sell order can cause severe price impact.

Target low$0.000100
Target high$0.000420
Support: $0.000279 (candle [1] low), $0.0000128 (candle [1] close / intracandle wick low)
Resistance: $0.000347 (candle [1] high), $0.000397 (candle [2] high)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

The token sat dormant at 28 holders for 30 consecutive days before a sudden 24h spike to 750 holders. This pattern is consistent with coordinated pump activity rather than organic growth. With sell volume exceeding buy volume, shallow liquidity, an unverified mutable contract, and no social presence, the medium-term outlook is bearish unless new catalysts emerge.

Catalysts
  • Sustained organic community growth beyond the initial pump wave
  • Liquidity deepening above $200K to reduce slippage risk
  • Contract verification and authority renouncement to build trust
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally

Bullish factors

  • 30.67% 24h price gain (from a low base)
  • Rapid holder acquisition: +722 holders in 24h
  • Active trading with 514 unique wallets in 24h
  • $560K in buy volume over 24h showing genuine demand

Bearish factors

  • Sell volume ($608K) exceeds buy volume ($560K) — net outflow
  • 940 sells vs 441 buys — sellers outnumber buyers 2:1 in transaction count
  • Candle [1] shows a catastrophic intracandle drop (~96%) suggesting a flash dump
  • Only $53.59K liquidity vs $317.50K FDV — severe slippage risk
  • 30 days of zero holder growth before the spike — likely coordinated pump
  • Unverified, mutable contract with unknown update authority
  • No social links, no community infrastructure visible on-chain
  • -9.84% price change in the last 1 hour
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) only 2 hourly OHLC candles available, (2) no top holder or sniper data, (3) extreme intracandle volatility making price levels unreliable, (4) the token's total supply is listed as '1' which may indicate a data anomaly, and (5) the 30-day holder stagnation followed by a single-day spike is highly anomalous.

FITNESS call history

Full track record →
Jun 23bearish
24h+108.8%
7d-98.1%
30d-98.5%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (20:00 UTC): O=$0.0000128, H=$0.000397, L=$0.0000128, C=$0.000294 — a massive bullish engulfing/spike candle with volume of $1.16M, suggesting an initial pump from near-zero. Candle [1] (21:00 UTC): O=$0.000301, H=$0.000347, L=$0.000279, C=$0.0000128 — the candle opened near candle [2]'s close, briefly pushed higher, then collapsed ~96% to close at $0.0000128 on volume of $7.6K. This is a classic 'pump and dump' candle sequence: a high-volume pump candle followed by a near-total collapse candle. The current price of ~$0.000318 implies a recovery after candle [1]'s close, but this recovery is not yet confirmed in the OHLC data.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 48%Sell 52%

Short-term trend is bearish given the -9.84% 1h change and the catastrophic close of candle [1]. Medium-term is effectively sideways/undefined given only 2 candles of history and 30 days of prior dormancy.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000279 (candle [1] low)
Major$0.0000128 (candle [1] close / wick bottom)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000347 (candle [1] high)
Major$0.000397 (candle [2] high / all-time high in data)

The $0.000279 level (candle [1] low) is the nearest support. A break below this opens a path to the $0.0000128 wick low. On the upside, $0.000347 is immediate resistance, with $0.000397 as the major resistance representing the session high. Given the shallow liquidity, these levels can be breached rapidly.

Notable patterns

  • Pump-and-dump candle sequence: massive bullish spike (candle [2], $1.16M volume) followed by near-total collapse (candle [1], ~96% intracandle drop)
  • Bearish shooting star / inverted hammer pattern on candle [1] — open near high, close near low
  • Volume exhaustion: $1.16M → $7.6K between consecutive candles (~99.3% drop)
  • 30-day price dormancy followed by sudden activation — consistent with coordinated launch/pump

Total holders750
24h Δ+722
7d Δ+722
30d Δ+722
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The holder count was completely flat at 28 for the entire 30-day historical period (May 24 – June 22, 2026), with zero net change on any day. Then, within a single 24-hour window, holders surged by +722 (from 28 to 750, a +96% increase). This spike is perfectly correlated with the price pump (+30.67% 24h) and the $1.16M volume candle, strongly suggesting the holder surge is a direct result of the pump event rather than organic community growth. The acquisition breakdown (278 via swap, 472 via transfer) is notable — 63% of new holders received tokens via transfer, which could indicate airdrop-style distribution or coordinated wallet seeding.

The holder growth pattern is highly anomalous. Thirty consecutive days of zero growth (28 holders) followed by a single-day explosion to 750 holders (+722, +96%) is a classic pump-event signature. The 7d and 30d growth figures are identical to the 24h figure, confirming all growth occurred within the last day. The high proportion of transfer-based acquisitions (472 of 750 holders, ~63%) vs swap-based (278, ~37%) raises questions about whether these are genuine independent buyers or coordinated wallet distributions. Distribution metrics show 0% concentration for whales/sharks/dolphins/fish/octopus and 0% for top10/top100 — this is likely a data anomaly given the total supply is listed as '1', making standard concentration metrics inapplicable.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available

0.00%

No top holder data is available for FITNESS. The reported top10 and top100 concentration of 0% is almost certainly a data artifact related to the token's unusual total supply of '1' (formatted), which makes standard percentage-of-supply calculations meaningless. With 750 holders and a total supply of 1 token (possibly with 0 decimals), the distribution mechanics are unclear and may indicate a data reporting issue. The absence of whale/shark/dolphin classifications in the distribution breakdown further confirms the concentration metrics are unreliable. Investors should treat the whale map as effectively unknown and exercise extreme caution.

Liquidity$53,590
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$560,340
Sell$608,680
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers266
Unique sellers427

Liquidity is critically shallow at $53.59K against a 24h trading volume of ~$1.17M — a volume-to-liquidity ratio of approximately 21.8x. This means the pool is being turned over more than 21 times its depth in a single day, creating extreme slippage risk for any meaningful position. The FDV of $317.50K is nearly 6x the available liquidity, further highlighting the disconnect. Net flow is negative (outflow): sell volume ($608.68K) exceeds buy volume ($560.34K) by ~$48K, and unique sellers (427) outnumber unique buyers (266) by 60%. The 24h buy/sell transaction count ratio (441 buys vs 940 sells) shows sellers are executing roughly 2.1x more transactions than buyers, suggesting active distribution. Market health is poor: shallow liquidity, net outflow, and a 2:1 seller-to-buyer transaction ratio are all bearish signals.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1 (formatted, 0 decimals) — likely a data anomaly; actual on-chain supply mechanics unclear
FDV$317,500

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token's metadata raises multiple red flags. The contract is unverified (verified=false), the token is mutable (mutable=true), and the update authority is listed as 'unknown' — none of these have been renounced or confirmed safe. A mutable token with an unknown update authority means the token's metadata (and potentially its behavior) can be changed by the creator at any time, which is a significant rug risk vector. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the available data, so both are marked 'unknown'. The total supply of '1' with 0 decimals is highly unusual for a memecoin and may indicate a data reporting issue, a token with a very unusual supply structure, or a misconfigured token. No social links are provided, and the token is not verified — there is no independent confirmation of the project's legitimacy. The rugRiskFromAuthorities is rated HIGH due to the combination of mutable contract, unknown authority, and unverified status.

Volatility
high

Extreme intracandle volatility observed: candle [1] shows a ~96% price collapse within a single hour. 24h price change of +30.67% masks severe intraday swings. The token can move catastrophically in either direction with minimal warning.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of only $53.59K against $1.17M in 24h volume (21.8x turnover ratio). Any sell order above a few hundred dollars will experience severe slippage. Exiting a meaningful position could move the price dramatically against the seller.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is unavailable, making true concentration unknown. The token's total supply of '1' (0 decimals) makes standard concentration metrics inapplicable. The 30-day dormancy at 28 holders followed by a single-day spike to 750 suggests the original 28 holders may hold dominant positions.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data is available, but the trading pattern (940 sells vs 441 buys, $608K sell volume vs $560K buy volume, candle [1]'s ~96% intracandle dump) is consistent with early holders or coordinated actors distributing into the pump. The risk of continued dumping is high.

Authority
high

Contract is unverified, mutable, and update authority is unknown. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. This combination means the token creator retains the ability to modify the token, creating a high rug-pull risk vector.

Key risks

  • Mutable, unverified contract with unknown update authority — rug pull risk
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($53.59K) creating extreme slippage and exit risk
  • Pump-and-dump pattern: 30 days dormant → single-day spike → sell pressure dominates
  • 940 sells vs 441 buys in 24h — active distribution by early holders
  • Total supply of '1' with 0 decimals is anomalous and may indicate token misconfiguration
  • No social links or community infrastructure — no accountability
  • 63% of new holders acquired via transfer (not swap) — possible coordinated wallet seeding
  • Only 2 hours of OHLC data available — insufficient price history for reliable analysis

Mitigating factors

  • 514 unique wallets traded in 24h — some genuine market interest exists
  • $560K in buy volume shows real capital deployment, not just wash trading
  • Token is listed as 'possible spam: false' by the data provider
  • PumpSwap listing provides some baseline of accessibility and discoverability
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of very high volatility, shallow liquidity, unknown authorities, pump-and-dump price action, and lack of transparency makes this one of the highest-risk token profiles possible.

FITNESS (Fit Coin) is a newly activated Solana memecoin that experienced a coordinated pump event within the last 24 hours after 30 days of complete dormancy. While the self-improvement memecoin narrative has some cultural resonance in the crypto community, the on-chain data presents a predominantly bearish picture: shallow liquidity, net sell pressure, an unverified mutable contract, anomalous supply metrics, and a classic pump-and-dump candle pattern. The investment thesis is speculative at best and carries very high risk of total loss.

Bull case (low)

The 24h holder surge (+722 to 750) represents genuine grassroots adoption of the fitness/self-improvement memecoin narrative. Buy volume ($560K) sustains, liquidity deepens, the team verifies the contract and renounces authorities, and the token rides a broader Solana memecoin cycle to 5–10x from current levels.

  • Sustained organic holder growth beyond the initial pump
  • Contract verification and authority renouncement
  • Development of social community (Twitter/Telegram)
  • Broader Solana memecoin market tailwind
  • Liquidity deepening above $200K

Base case

The token experiences continued high volatility over the next 48–72 hours as the pump fades. Price oscillates between $0.000150 and $0.000350, with gradual holder attrition as speculators exit. Without new catalysts (social media traction, influencer attention, utility development), the token slowly returns to low-activity status with a smaller but more committed holder base.

  • No major new catalysts emerge in the short term
  • Liquidity remains shallow, limiting both upside and downside velocity
  • The original 28 holders continue gradual distribution
  • No contract exploit or rug event occurs
  • Broader Solana market remains neutral

Bear case (high)

The pump-and-dump pattern completes: early holders (the original 28 who held through 30 days of dormancy) continue distributing into retail demand, liquidity drains, and the price collapses back toward the candle [1] close of $0.0000128 or lower. The mutable contract is exploited or the project is abandoned.

  • 940 sells vs 441 buys already showing distribution dominance
  • Candle [1]'s ~96% intracandle collapse as a preview of downside
  • Shallow $53.59K liquidity unable to absorb selling pressure
  • Unknown update authority retaining rug-pull capability
  • No social links or community infrastructure to sustain interest

GeneratedJun 23, 09:17 PM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of ~2026-06-23T21:00Z. OHLC data covers the 2 most recent hourly candles. Historical holder data covers May 24 – June 22, 2026 (30 days). Sniper data unavailable.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, decimals, supply, authority, mutability)
  • PumpSwap pair data (rTopeZGR592HepW8WfC4ZAak5EZHgrYxRoXZsvShU2Y)
  • Trading analytics (24h volume, buy/sell breakdown, unique wallets)
  • OHLC candle data (2 hourly candles, USD)
  • Holder metrics (total, acquisition type, distribution, concentration)
  • Historical holder series (30 daily snapshots, May 24 – June 22, 2026)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • No top holder data available — whale map and concentration analysis are severely limited
  • No sniper data available — early buyer behavior cannot be assessed
  • Total supply of '1' with 0 decimals is anomalous — tokenomics and concentration metrics may be unreliable
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' — cannot confirm or deny authority renouncement
  • No social links available — community health and project legitimacy cannot be assessed
  • Historical holder data shows 30 days of zero activity, making trend analysis based on historical data unreliable
  • The 24h/7d/30d holder growth figures are identical, confirming all growth occurred in a single day — growth rate calculations are not meaningful across timeframes

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially in memecoins, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed comes from on-chain sources and third-party providers and may contain errors or anomalies. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1 (formatted, 0 decimals) — likely a data anomaly; actual on-chain supply mechanics unclear

Key Risks

•Mutable, unverified contract with unknown update authority — rug pull risk
•Critically shallow liquidity ($53.59K) creating extreme slippage and exit risk
•Pump-and-dump pattern: 30 days dormant → single-day spike → sell pressure dominates
•940 sells vs 441 buys in 24h — active distribution by early holders

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for FITNESS. As per methodology, sniperConcentrationPercent is set to 0 and all sniper-derived metrics are marked unknown. The absence of sniper data does not confirm safety — it may simply reflect data unavailability for this newly active token. The trading pattern (940 sells vs 441 buys, $608K sell volume vs $560K buy volume) suggests early participants may be distributing, but this cannot be confirmed without sniper wallet data.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available for this token.

Indeterminate — no sniper wallet data available. However, the sell-heavy transaction count (940 sells vs 441 buys) and the catastrophic intracandle dump in candle [1] suggest early buyers who entered during the pump may be taking profits or cutting losses.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for Fit Coin (FITNESS)?

The most recent hourly candle (candle [1]) closed at $0.0000128 — a ~96% collapse from its open of $0.000301 — before the current price recovered to ~$0.000318. This extreme intracandle volatility, combined with net sell pressure (52.1% sell volume, 940 sells vs 441 buys), and a -9.84% 1h price change, suggests continued short-term downside risk. The 5m change of -1.29% confirms ongoing selling. With only $53.59K in liquidity, any moderate sell order can cause severe price impact. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–48 hours), with a target range of $0.000100 to $0.000420.

Is FITNESS a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of very high volatility, shallow liquidity, unknown authorities, pump-and-dump price action, and lack of transparency makes this one of the highest-risk token profiles possible.

How are FITNESS holders trending?

Fit Coin currently has 750 holders and is growing (24h: 722, 7d: 722, 30d: 722). The holder growth pattern is highly anomalous. Thirty consecutive days of zero growth (28 holders) followed by a single-day explosion to 750 holders (+722, +96%) is a classic pump-event signature. The 7d and 30d growth figures are identical to the 24h figure, confirming all growth occurred within the last day. The high proportion of transfer-based acquisitions (472 of 750 holders, ~63%) vs swap-based (278, ~37%) raises questions about whether these are genuine independent buyers or coordinated wallet distributions. Distribution metrics show 0% concentration for whales/sharks/dolphins/fish/octopus and 0% for top10/top100 — this is likely a data anomaly given the total supply is listed as '1', making standard concentration metrics inapplicable.

What does sniper activity look like for FITNESS?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding FITNESS?

Mutable, unverified contract with unknown update authority — rug pull risk • Critically shallow liquidity ($53.59K) creating extreme slippage and exit risk • Pump-and-dump pattern: 30 days dormant → single-day spike → sell pressure dominates

← Back to all predictions

Track FITNESS