SCF

Smoking Chicken Fish Price Prediction 2026

SCF
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 9, 2026

9ALFsiGXX9CgSGxwTQxJoUaVB19KGT9v18nj11bNpump

$0.054829

FDV $4,734

LiveContract:9ALFsiGXX9CgSGxwTQxJoUaVB19KGT9v18nj11bNpumpChain:SolanaHolders:311Market cap:$4,734

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about SCF

Report snapshotas of Jun 9, 07:19 PM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$0

Holders

957

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Smoking Chicken Fish (SCF) is a Solana memecoin (mint: 9ALFsiGXX9CgSGxwTQxJoUaVB19KGT9v18nj11bNpump) with a total supply of 1,000,000,000 tokens. The token presents a deeply alarming set of on-chain signals: zero reported liquidity ($0.00), zero price data, massively lopsided sell pressure (83.3% sell volume vs 16.7% buy volume), and a severe data inconsistency between the historical holder series (showing only 9 holders flat for 30 days) and the current holder count of 957. The token appears to be in a terminal or near-dead state with no meaningful market activity.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Zero on-chain liquidity reported ($0.00 total liquidity), making the token effectively untradeable
Extreme sell-side dominance: 83.3% sell pressure ($158.36K sell vs $31.78K buy volume in 24h)
Critical data inconsistency: historical series shows 9 holders flat for 30 days while current count reports 957 — strongly suggests data anomaly or token migration/relaunch
No price data available and 0% price change across all timeframes — indicative of dead or illiquid market
Unverified contract, unknown update authority, and mutable=false metadata

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–7 days

No price data is available and liquidity is reported at $0.00, making any price target speculative. The extreme sell pressure (83.3% of 24h volume) and absence of liquidity suggest continued price deterioration or complete illiquidity. The token may be effectively untradeable at any meaningful size.

Target lowUnknown (no price data; effective value near $0 given $0 liquidity)
Target highUnknown (no price data available)
Support: No OHLC data available — support levels cannot be derived
Resistance: No OHLC data available — resistance levels cannot be derived

Medium term

bearish
1–4 weeks

Without liquidity, price discovery, or a growing holder base, medium-term prospects are extremely poor. Recovery would require a significant liquidity injection and reversal of sell pressure — neither of which is evidenced in the data.

Catalysts
  • Liquidity pool creation or re-listing on a DEX
  • Community-driven buyback campaign
  • Viral social media attention driving new buyers
  • Token migration or relaunch event

Bullish factors

  • 24h buy volume of $31.78K indicates some residual buyer interest (150 unique buyers)
  • Social links (Twitter, website) suggest some community infrastructure exists
  • Token description references an active X (Twitter) community chat

Bearish factors

  • Zero reported liquidity ($0.00) — token is effectively untradeable
  • 83.3% sell pressure ($158.36K sell volume vs $31.78K buy volume in 24h)
  • 2,780 sells vs only 324 buys in 24h — overwhelming net selling
  • No price data across any timeframe (5m, 1h, 6h, 24h all show 0%)
  • Historical holder series flat at 9 for 30 days — severe data anomaly or dead token
  • Unverified contract and unknown update authority
Confidence: low. Confidence is low because no price data, no OHLC candles, and $0.00 liquidity are reported. All directional calls are inferred from volume imbalance and holder stagnation rather than price action.

Deep Analysis

No OHLC candle data is available for SCF. Technical analysis based on price action cannot be performed. All technical observations are derived from volume and trading analytics only.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 17%Sell 83%

With no price data and zero reported liquidity, the token exhibits characteristics of a dead or near-dead market. The overwhelming sell-side dominance (83.3% sell pressure, 2,780 sells vs 324 buys in 24h) implies a persistent downtrend in sentiment and market participation, even if price levels cannot be confirmed.

Key Price Levels

Support
ImmediateUnknown — no OHLC data available
MajorUnknown — no OHLC data available
Resistance
ImmediateUnknown — no OHLC data available
MajorUnknown — no OHLC data available

No OHLC candle data was provided. Support and resistance levels cannot be derived. Analysts should consult DEX chart data directly if/when liquidity is restored.

Notable patterns

  • No candle patterns can be identified — OHLC data absent
  • Volume pattern: extreme sell-side dominance (83.3% sell pressure) consistent with capitulation or exit event
  • Buyer-to-seller ratio of ~1:6.9 (150 buyers vs 1,029 sellers) — bearish participation imbalance
  • Zero price change across all timeframes (5m, 1h, 6h, 24h) despite active volume — suggests price feed failure or complete liquidity absence

Total holders957
24h Δ+948
7d Δ+948
30d Δ+948
Accelerating Growth
No

Correlation with price

No price data is available to correlate with holder growth. The reported +948 holder increase is entirely inconsistent with the historical series, which shows a flat 9 holders per day for the entire 30-day period. This is a critical data anomaly.

There is a severe and irreconcilable inconsistency in the holder data. The historical daily series shows exactly 9 holders with zero net change every single day from 2026-05-10 through 2026-06-08 (30 days). Yet the current holder count is reported as 957, with +948 growth attributed to the last 1h, 24h, 7d, and 30d periods simultaneously — all showing the identical figure of +948. This is statistically impossible under normal circumstances and strongly suggests: (1) a data indexing error or API anomaly, (2) a token migration or relaunch event that reset the historical series, or (3) a sudden airdrop or batch transfer to 948 wallets not yet reflected in the historical series. The distribution breakdown shows 0 whales, 0 sharks, 0 dolphins, 0 fish, and 0 octopus — further suggesting the holder classification system has not processed the new holders. Investors should treat the holder count as unreliable until confirmed by an independent source. The acquisition method shows 952 via swap and 5 via transfer, which partially supports a genuine holder base, but the data inconsistency remains a major red flag.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

No top holder data available

Unknown — top holders data not provided

0.00%

No top holder data is available for SCF. The supply concentration metrics report top10=0% and top100=0%, which is almost certainly a data artifact rather than a genuine reflection of distribution — it is mathematically impossible for the top 10 holders to hold 0% of supply if any holders exist. This further reinforces the data quality concerns identified in the holder trends section. Without top holder data, whale sentiment, concentration risk, and distribution health cannot be properly assessed. The 'very_concentrated' classification is assigned as a conservative default given the data vacuum and the token's early/illiquid stage.

Liquidity$0.00
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$31,780
Sell$158,360
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers150
Unique sellers1,029

SCF's market health is critically impaired. Total reported liquidity is $0.00, meaning there is no accessible liquidity pool for trading — any reported volume may be occurring through residual pool remnants, OTC, or is itself a data anomaly. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: $158.36K in sell volume versus only $31.78K in buy volume, representing an 83.3% sell dominance. There are 1,029 unique sellers versus only 150 unique buyers — a 6.9:1 ratio. With 2,780 sell transactions versus 324 buy transactions, the average sell is ~$57 and average buy is ~$98, suggesting buyers are making larger individual purchases but are vastly outnumbered. The slippage risk is rated high because $0 liquidity means any trade would face extreme price impact. This token should be considered effectively untradeable at current liquidity levels.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1,000,000,000 SCF
FDVUnknown — no price data available

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

SCF has a total supply of 1,000,000,000 tokens with 6 decimals, consistent with a standard Pump.fun launch. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' and the contract is unverified, preventing definitive assessment of mint and freeze authority status. The metadata field 'mutable' is reported as false, which is a positive signal suggesting token metadata cannot be changed — however, this does not confirm mint or freeze authority renouncement. The contract is not verified and is not flagged as spam. The token description ('Thou Shalt Hold So He Is Richer Than He Who Sold') is a community-holding narrative typical of memecoins. The FDV is $0.00 per trading analytics, consistent with the absence of price data. Until mint and freeze authority status can be confirmed on-chain, rug risk from authorities is rated unknown. Investors should verify authority status independently via Solana explorers (e.g., Solscan, SolanaFM).

Volatility
high

No price data is available, but the extreme sell pressure (83.3%), zero liquidity, and data inconsistencies suggest the token could experience violent price swings if/when liquidity is restored. Memecoin category inherently carries high volatility.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity is reported at $0.00. The token is effectively untradeable. Any position cannot be exited without a functioning liquidity pool. This is the single most critical risk factor.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is unavailable and concentration metrics report 0% for top 10 and top 100 — a clear data anomaly. Without verified distribution data, concentration risk must be assumed high for a token at this stage.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data is available. However, the extreme sell pressure (2,780 sells vs 324 buys, $158.36K vs $31.78K) is consistent with early holders or snipers executing a coordinated exit. The risk of further dumping is high.

Authority
medium

Update authority is unknown and the contract is unverified. Mutable=false is a positive signal for metadata immutability, but mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. Rated medium rather than high solely due to the mutable=false flag.

Key risks

  • Zero liquidity ($0.00) — token is effectively untradeable and any held position cannot be exited
  • Extreme sell pressure: 83.3% of 24h volume is sells; 1,029 sellers vs 150 buyers
  • Critical data inconsistency in holder metrics (9 holders for 30 days vs current 957) undermines data reliability
  • Unverified contract and unknown update/mint/freeze authority status
  • No price data available — impossible to assess current valuation or entry/exit points
  • Top holder data unavailable — concentration risk cannot be assessed
  • Pump.fun mint address suffix suggests speculative memecoin with no fundamental utility

Mitigating factors

  • Mutable=false metadata reduces risk of metadata manipulation
  • Some residual buyer interest exists (150 unique buyers, $31.78K buy volume in 24h)
  • Social infrastructure present (Twitter, website, Moralis links)
  • Token is not flagged as spam by the data provider
  • 952 holders acquired via swap suggests organic purchase activity
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of any invested capital. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone who cannot afford total loss. The combination of zero liquidity, extreme sell pressure, data anomalies, and unverified contract status makes this one of the highest-risk assets possible.

SCF is a high-risk Solana memecoin in what appears to be a terminal or near-dead state. The investment case is almost entirely speculative, predicated on a community revival or viral social media event. The data presents multiple critical red flags: zero liquidity, overwhelming sell pressure, severe holder data inconsistencies, and no verifiable price. Any investment thesis must be treated as pure speculation.

Bull case (low)

Community Revival / Viral Catalyst

  • Viral social media campaign on X (Twitter) drives new buyer influx
  • Liquidity pool is re-established by team or community, enabling price discovery
  • Broader Solana memecoin season lifts all boats, including SCF
  • Token migration or relaunch event resolves data anomalies and resets holder base

Base case

Prolonged Illiquidity / Zombie Token

  • Token remains in a zombie state — technically existing on-chain but with no functional market
  • Occasional small buy/sell activity continues but no meaningful price recovery
  • Holder count stabilizes but no significant new capital enters
  • Token is eventually abandoned by its community as attention moves to other memecoins

Bear case (high)

Complete Token Death / Rug

  • Zero liquidity persists, making the token permanently untradeable
  • Remaining holders are unable to exit, leading to total value loss
  • Unknown authority status allows potential mint or freeze actions by deployer
  • Data anomalies reflect a token that has already effectively failed
  • Continued sell pressure from remaining holders drives any residual value to zero

GeneratedJun 9, 07:19 PM
Data freshnessHistorical holder data current to 2026-06-08. Trading analytics reflect 24h window ending at analysis time. Price, OHLC, sniper, and top holder data were not available.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (mint: 9ALFsiGXX9CgSGxwTQxJoUaVB19KGT9v18nj11bNpump)
  • Trading analytics (24h volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
  • Sniper analysis data (not available)
  • OHLC candle data (not available)
  • Top holder / whale map data (not available)
  • Price feed data (not available)

Limitations

  • No price data available — all price-based analysis is impossible
  • No OHLC candle data — technical analysis is severely limited to volume metrics only
  • No sniper data — smart money signals cannot be properly assessed
  • No top holder data — whale map and concentration analysis cannot be performed
  • Critical inconsistency between historical holder series (9 holders, flat for 30 days) and current holder count (957) undermines data reliability across all holder-based metrics
  • Zero liquidity reported — market health assessment is based on volume data only, which may itself be unreliable
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are unknown — tokenomics risk cannot be fully assessed
  • Token contract is unverified — on-chain code cannot be audited

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. All data is sourced from third-party providers and may be incomplete, delayed, or inaccurate. The token data block is treated as untrusted evidence per analysis ground rules. Investing in Solana memecoins carries extreme risk of total capital loss. Always conduct your own due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1,000,000,000 SCF

Key Risks

Zero liquidity ($0.00) — token is effectively untradeable and any held position cannot be exited
Extreme sell pressure: 83.3% of 24h volume is sells; 1,029 sellers vs 150 buyers
Critical data inconsistency in holder metrics (9 holders for 30 days vs current 957) undermines data reliability
Unverified contract and unknown update/mint/freeze authority status

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper analysis data was provided for SCF. Smart money signals cannot be reliably assessed. The absence of sniper data, combined with zero liquidity and extreme sell pressure, suggests either the token never attracted sophisticated early buyers or any such data is unavailable from the data provider.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available

Unknown — no sniper data available. The extreme sell-side dominance (83.3% sell volume, 2,780 sells vs 324 buys in 24h) suggests early holders who remain are exiting or have already exited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for Smoking Chicken Fish (SCF)?

No price data is available and liquidity is reported at $0.00, making any price target speculative. The extreme sell pressure (83.3% of 24h volume) and absence of liquidity suggest continued price deterioration or complete illiquidity. The token may be effectively untradeable at any meaningful size. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–7 days), with a target range of Unknown (no price data; effective value near $0 given $0 liquidity) to Unknown (no price data available).

Is SCF a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of any invested capital. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone who cannot afford total loss. The combination of zero liquidity, extreme sell pressure, data anomalies, and unverified contract status makes this one of the highest-risk assets possible.

How are SCF holders trending?

Smoking Chicken Fish currently has 957 holders and is growing (24h: 948, 7d: 948, 30d: 948). There is a severe and irreconcilable inconsistency in the holder data. The historical daily series shows exactly 9 holders with zero net change every single day from 2026-05-10 through 2026-06-08 (30 days). Yet the current holder count is reported as 957, with +948 growth attributed to the last 1h, 24h, 7d, and 30d periods simultaneously — all showing the identical figure of +948. This is statistically impossible under normal circumstances and strongly suggests: (1) a data indexing error or API anomaly, (2) a token migration or relaunch event that reset the historical series, or (3) a sudden airdrop or batch transfer to 948 wallets not yet reflected in the historical series. The distribution breakdown shows 0 whales, 0 sharks, 0 dolphins, 0 fish, and 0 octopus — further suggesting the holder classification system has not processed the new holders. Investors should treat the holder count as unreliable until confirmed by an independent source. The acquisition method shows 952 via swap and 5 via transfer, which partially supports a genuine holder base, but the data inconsistency remains a major red flag.

What does sniper activity look like for SCF?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding SCF?

Zero liquidity ($0.00) — token is effectively untradeable and any held position cannot be exited • Extreme sell pressure: 83.3% of 24h volume is sells; 1,029 sellers vs 150 buyers • Critical data inconsistency in holder metrics (9 holders for 30 days vs current 957) undermines data reliability

Track SCF