LOCK IN Price Today & AI Analysis

LOCKINSolanaAnalysis as of May 7, 2026

$0.000900

-3.48% 24h

Contract

Live

8Ki8DpuWNxu9VsS3kQbarsCWMcFGWkzzA8pUPto9zBd5

Chain

Solana

Holders

18,880

Market cap

$894,541

At a $10M market cap, $LOCKIN would be $0.0101 (11.2x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is LOCKIN a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 1

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about LOCKIN

3 free answers a day

More tokens on Solana

TESTICLEtesticle$0.000184-1.6%MC $183.8K

CludeCLUDE$0.000368-9.1%MC $367.9K

AISIArtificial Intelligent Super Inu$0.0₄1486+20.9%MC $14.9K

Xingxingxingxing$0.0₄4554+0.8%MC $44.5K

MONOMonorail$0.0₅8979-34.9%MC $8.0K

ZECZcash$1,221.46+4.3%MC $126.35M

LOCK IN: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-07 02:48 UTC

Holder addresses

19,511

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$451,598.94

How concentrated is LOCK IN ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 19,511 addresses (2026-05-07 02:48 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling LOCK IN?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is LOCK IN liquidity falling?: As of 2026-05-07 02:48 UTC, reported liquidity was $451,598.94. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-07 02:48 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of May 7, 02:48 AM UTC

FDV

$3,650,138

Liquidity

$451,598.94

Holders

19,511

Snipers

Not available

Risk

High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

High

Sentiment

Bullish

LOCKIN (LOCK IN) is a Solana-based meme/community token with a total supply of ~994.4M tokens and a current price of $0.003671, representing a massive 182.6% 24h gain. The token trades on Raydium with $451.6K in liquidity and a fully diluted valuation of ~$3.5M. While the price surge is dramatic, holder counts have been in a slow 30-day decline (-287 net over 30 days), suggesting the pump is driven by trading activity rather than broad new adoption. No snipers were detected in the first 1,000 blocks, which is a positive signal. The update authority is not a burn address, and the token is mutable=false, providing partial but not complete authority assurance.

Key points

Zero snipers detected in first 1,000 blocks — clean launch with no early predatory accumulation
185% 24h price surge with sustained buy pressure (58.2% buy volume) across 996 buy transactions
$451.6K total liquidity on Raydium providing moderate depth for a sub-$4M FDV token
19,511 holders with broad distribution across fish/octopus/dolphin tiers, top 10 hold only 31.29%
Mutable=false metadata and verified contract reduce certain manipulation vectors

AI Price Analysis

bullish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bullish

Price has surged from ~$0.00130 to $0.003671 within the 23-hour candle window, a ~182% move. The most recent candle (02:00 UTC) shows a strong bullish body closing at $0.003671 after opening at $0.002843, with a high of $0.004039. Momentum is strongly bullish in the very short term, but the move is extended and a pullback toward $0.0028–$0.0030 is plausible before any continuation.

Target low

$0.0026

Target high

$0.0045

Support: $0.0028 (prior candle open / breakout zone), $0.0017 (pre-pump consolidation range), $0.0013 (30-day base)
Resistance: $0.004039 (24h intraday high), $0.0050 (psychological round number), $0.0060 (extension target if momentum holds)

Medium term · 7–30 days

neutral

The 30-day holder trend is declining (-287 net holders, -1.50%), indicating that the broader community has been slowly exiting prior to this pump. Sustained medium-term upside requires new holder acquisition and continued buy pressure. Without a fundamental catalyst or viral narrative expansion, mean reversion toward the $0.0015–$0.0020 range is the base expectation.

Catalysts

Viral social media momentum on Twitter (@lockinsol) and Telegram driving new buyer inflows
Broader Solana meme season or market-wide risk-on sentiment
Whale accumulation at current levels sustaining price floor
Exchange listing or partnership announcement

Bullish factors

58.2% buy pressure with $21.29K buy volume vs $15.27K sell volume in 24h
Zero sniper activity — no early predatory wallets waiting to dump
Strong momentum across all timeframes: +5.86% (5m), +25.79% (1h), +109.18% (6h), +185.09% (24h)
Moderate liquidity of $451.6K relative to FDV provides reasonable entry/exit depth
Verified contract and mutable=false reduce certain rug vectors

Bearish factors

30-day holder decline of -287 (-1.50%) shows structural community erosion prior to pump
7-day holder decline of -51 (-0.26%) — pump not yet attracting net new long-term holders
Top 10 wallets hold 31.29% of supply; top 100 hold 63.44% — meaningful concentration risk
Update authority (3JmxqCyqg49h9xKoUjGLo6DrXEpbrJu86g2wrLgMmjUV) is not renounced
Sell count (1,352) exceeds buy count (996) in 24h despite net buy volume dominance — many small sells
FDV of $3.5M is modest but price has already moved 182% in one day, limiting upside risk/reward

Confidence: low. Price prediction confidence is low due to the highly speculative meme token nature, the absence of fundamental value drivers, the 30-day declining holder trend contradicting the short-term pump, and the limited OHLC history (23 hourly candles) available for technical analysis. The 182%+ single-day move introduces extreme mean-reversion risk.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 8Ki8Dp...zBd5
Total Supply: 994,355,591.69

Key Risks

Extreme overbought conditions after 182%+ single-day pump — high mean reversion probability
30-day declining holder trend (-287, -1.50%) suggests structural community erosion
Update authority not renounced — team retains some control vectors
Mint/freeze authority status unknown — cannot fully rule out supply manipulation

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 23-hour OHLC series shows a prolonged base/consolidation phase from candles [23] through [7] (roughly $0.001294–$0.001810), followed by a sharp two-candle breakout in candles [2] and [1]. Candle [2] (01:00 UTC) broke out from $0.001774 to a high of $0.003146, closing at $0.002817 — a strong bullish engulfing relative to the prior range. Candle [1] (02:00 UTC, most recent) continued the surge, opening at $0.002843, reaching a high of $0.004039, and closing at $0.003671 with volume of $12,153 — the highest single-hour volume in the dataset. The base range (candles [3]–[22]) traded in a tight $0.001294–$0.001837 band with very low volume (typically $50–$1,860), confirming accumulation/dormancy before the explosive move.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is a sharp uptrend driven by the last two candles. Medium-term (prior 20 candles) was sideways/ranging between $0.001294 and $0.001837. The breakout is decisive but occurred on relatively modest absolute volume, raising questions about sustainability.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

58%

Sell

42%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0028 (candle [2] open / breakout origin)

Major support

$0.0017 (top of prior consolidation range, candles [3]–[9])

Immediate resistance

$0.004039 (candle [1] intraday high)

Major resistance

$0.0050 (psychological level / 2.5x from base)

The $0.0028 level is the most critical near-term support — a close below this would signal the breakout has failed and a retest of the $0.0017 consolidation zone is likely. The $0.004039 high from candle [1] is the immediate resistance; a clean break above this with sustained volume would open the path toward $0.0050.

Notable patterns

Bull engulfing at candle [2]: body completely engulfs prior 20+ candles' range
Volume climax at candle [1]: highest hourly volume in dataset coinciding with new high — potential exhaustion signal
Extended base formation (candles [3]–[22]): ~20 hours of tight consolidation before breakout
Higher high and higher close in candle [1] vs candle [2]: short-term uptrend structure intact
Thin wick on candle [1] high ($0.004039) relative to close ($0.003671): ~9% rejection from top, mild bearish signal

Liquidity

$451,598.94

Depth

Moderate

Slippage risk

Medium

Total liquidity of $451.6K on the Raydium pair (AtWMAA6T9t8cq8XCccCFPGDNNQYXhScuNuY6WVRi7FKe) is moderate relative to the $3.5M FDV — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~12.9%, which is reasonable for a small-cap meme token. The 24h net flow is positive with $21.29K in buy volume vs $15.27K in sell volume (58.2%/41.8% split). Notably, sell transaction count (1,352) exceeds buy count (996), meaning sellers are more numerous in transaction terms but buyers are deploying larger average order sizes ($21.37 avg buy vs $11.29 avg sell). Unique buyers (152) outnumber unique sellers (116), a bullish signal. Slippage risk is medium — a $10K market order would likely move price by 2–5% given current depth. The liquidity pool appears healthy but not deep enough to absorb large whale exits without significant price impact.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

994,355,591.69

FDV

$3,650,137.55

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
182.6% single-day price move with momentum indicators in extreme overbought territory. Historical base was $0.0013–$0.0018 for 20+ hours; current price at $0.003671 represents a 2–2.8x premium over that base. Mean reversion risk is substantial.
Liquiditymedium
$451.6K total liquidity is moderate for a $3.5M FDV token (~12.9% ratio). Medium-to-large orders ($20K+) will face meaningful slippage. Thin order book depth could amplify downside moves if whales exit.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme overbought conditions after 182%+ single-day pump — high mean reversion probability
30-day declining holder trend (-287, -1.50%) suggests structural community erosion
Update authority not renounced — team retains some control vectors
Mint/freeze authority status unknown — cannot fully rule out supply manipulation
Sell transaction count (1,352) exceeds buy count (996) — many small sellers could cascade
Top 10 concentration at 31.29% with several round-number whale wallets of unclear origin
Low absolute liquidity ($451.6K) amplifies price impact of large exits

Mitigating factors

Zero snipers in first 1,000 blocks — no predatory early accumulation overhang
Mutable=false metadata — token parameters cannot be arbitrarily changed
Verified contract and 'possible spam: false' classification
Broad holder base of 19,511 with retail-dominated distribution tiers
Net buy volume dominance (58.2%) with more unique buyers than sellers in 24h
Active social presence (Twitter, Telegram, website) suggesting ongoing project engagement
Raydium DEX listing with transparent on-chain liquidity

Suitable for

Suitable only for high-risk-tolerant, experienced DeFi traders who understand meme token dynamics and can afford to lose their entire investment. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking stable returns, or anyone investing more than a small speculative allocation. Position sizing should be minimal given the extreme volatility and post-pump entry risk.

LOCKIN is a Solana meme/community token that has experienced a dramatic 182%+ single-day price surge from a prolonged base. Its clean launch (zero snipers), verified contract, and moderate liquidity are genuine positives. However, the 30-day declining holder trend, unknown authority status, post-pump entry risk, and lack of fundamental value drivers make this a high-risk speculative play. The investment thesis hinges entirely on momentum continuation and community narrative strength.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Viral momentum continuation: the LOCKIN narrative gains traction on Crypto Twitter and Telegram, attracting a new wave of buyers. The token breaks above $0.004039 resistance with sustained volume, targeting $0.005–$0.006. New holder acquisition reverses the 30-day declining trend, and the project announces a catalyst (exchange listing, partnership, or viral meme campaign).

Sustained buy pressure above 58% with increasing volume
Social media virality driving new holder acquisition
Break above $0.004039 intraday high with conviction
Broader Solana meme season or market-wide risk-on environment
Zero sniper overhang means no cheap-cost-basis sellers waiting to dump

Base Case

Partial retracement followed by stabilization: price pulls back 30–50% from the pump high to the $0.0020–$0.0028 range, finding support at the breakout zone. The token stabilizes with moderate trading activity, holder count recovers slightly, and price trades sideways in the $0.0018–$0.0030 range over the next 7–14 days pending a new catalyst.

Buy pressure remains above 50% preventing a full collapse
The $0.0028 breakout level holds as support on a retest
No major whale exits in the immediate term
Social community remains engaged without a major new catalyst
Broader Solana market conditions remain neutral to positive

Bear Case

High probability

Post-pump exhaustion and mean reversion: the 182% pump was a short-lived liquidity event. Volume dries up, existing holders take profits, and price retraces toward the pre-pump consolidation zone of $0.0015–$0.0018. The 30-day declining holder trend resumes, and the token fades into low-activity obscurity.

Overbought technical conditions with no fundamental catalyst
30-day holder decline trend reasserting itself post-pump
Sell transaction count (1,352) exceeding buy count (996) signals distribution
Whale wallets (7.54%, 4.28%, 3.16%) taking profits at elevated prices
Low absolute liquidity amplifying downside price impact

Analysis details

Generated

May 7, 02:48 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-07 02:48 UTC

Model confidence

Medium

Data sources

On-chain Solana token metadata (mint, authority, supply, decimals)
Raydium DEX pair data (AtWMAA6T9t8cq8XCccCFPGDNNQYXhScuNuY6WVRi7FKe)
Hourly OHLC price candles (23 candles, USD-denominated)
24h trading analytics (volume, buy/sell counts, unique wallets)
Top 20 holder snapshot with balance data
30-day daily historical holder count series
Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks post-launch)
Token social metadata (Twitter, Telegram, website)

Limitations

Only 23 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust multi-timeframe technical analysis
Mint authority and freeze authority status not explicitly provided in metadata
Sniper data covers only first 1,000 blocks; later accumulation by sophisticated actors not captured
Top holder classification is inferred from address patterns and balance sizes, not confirmed on-chain labels
No order book depth data available — slippage estimates are approximations
30-day holder history is daily granularity only; intraday holder dynamics not visible
No information on team identity, vesting schedules, or token unlock events
FDV figures vary slightly between metadata ($3,650,137.55) and analytics ($3.50M) — likely due to price timing differences

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is LOCK IN (LOCKIN) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Nov 1, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell LOCK IN (LOCKIN)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 1, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is LOCK IN ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 19,511 addresses (2026-05-07 02:48 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling LOCK IN?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is LOCK IN liquidity falling?

As of 2026-05-07 02:48 UTC, reported liquidity was $451,598.94. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for LOCK IN (LOCKIN)?

Is LOCKIN a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as high with a risk score of 72/100. Suitable only for high-risk-tolerant, experienced DeFi traders who understand meme token dynamics and can afford to lose their entire investment. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking stable returns, or anyone investing more than a small speculative allocation. Position sizing should be minimal given the extreme volatility and post-pump entry risk.

What are the key risks of holding LOCKIN?

Extreme overbought conditions after 182%+ single-day pump — high mean reversion probability • 30-day declining holder trend (-287, -1.50%) suggests structural community erosion • Update authority not renounced — team retains some control vectors