How concentrated is Silver Inu ownership?

Not measured: this report has no holder data.

Are large holders selling Silver Inu?

Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.

Is Silver Inu liquidity falling?

This report saved one reading, $38,102.20 (2026-08-13 18:47 UTC), and one reading can't show a trend.

Silver Inu Price Today & AI Analysis

SILVERINUSolanaAnalysis as of Aug 13, 2026

$0.0₇3067

Contract

Live

8B8Hvfmv5T2ijSxVxPya3DX51ghJj8ZzJozU5ZhFvhTe

Chain

Solana

Holders

Market cap

$30

At a $1M market cap, $SILVERINU would be $0.001022 (33Kx from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is SILVERINU a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 11

Caution

Unhosted found some red flags. None proves a scam on its own.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token blocks a sell

Transfer fee

3%Every buy and sell

Launch wallets hold

0.23%1 bundler still holding

Every transfer, buys and sells alike, pays a 3% fee.
There is very little liquidity in the pool.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about SILVERINU

3 free answers a day

Silver Inu: holders, selling & liquidity

Saved with the report, 2026-08-13 18:47 UTC

Holder addresses

Not in this report

Top 10 supply share

Not in this report

Reported liquidity

$38,102.20

How concentrated is Silver Inu ownership?: Not measured: this report has no holder data.
Are large holders selling Silver Inu?: Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.
Is Silver Inu liquidity falling?: This report saved one reading, $38,102.20 (2026-08-13 18:47 UTC), and one reading can't show a trend.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-08-13 18:47 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Aug 13, 06:47 PM UTC

FDV

$79,284

Liquidity

$38,102.20

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Silver Inu (SILVERINU) is a meme token launched on StonkFun on the Solana blockchain (mint: 8B8Hvfmv5T2ijSxVxPya3DX51ghJj8ZzJozU5ZhFvhTe). It carries a total supply of ~970M tokens and a fully diluted valuation of approximately $79K–$80.5K. The token has experienced an extreme 24h price surge of ~221%, though the OHLC candle data reveals deeply anomalous price readings (hourly highs of $64+ vs. a current price of ~$0.000082) that strongly suggest data artifacts, wash trading, or manipulation. Liquidity is extremely shallow at $38.1K, and the contract is unverified. Overall risk is very high.

Key points

Launched on StonkFun — a newer launchpad with limited vetting
Extreme 24h price volatility (+221%) with anomalous OHLC candle data suggesting possible manipulation or data errors
Very shallow liquidity ($38.1K) relative to 24h trading volume (~$348K), creating severe slippage risk
Unverified contract with mutable metadata authority not renounced
Near-balanced buy/sell pressure (49.7% buys vs. 50.3% sells) with 931 unique wallets active in 24h

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24–72 hours

bearish

The token's current price of ~$0.000082 is dramatically disconnected from the OHLC candle data which shows hourly highs of $64–$65 and closes near those levels in the most recent candle. This extreme discrepancy is a major red flag — either the candle data is corrupted/manipulated, or the price has already collapsed by ~99.9% from recent highs. Given the shallow liquidity ($38.1K), any sustained sell pressure will cause rapid price deterioration. The 5-minute change of -0.265% and near-balanced sell pressure (50.3%) suggest continued downward drift is likely in the near term.

Target low

$0.000040

Target high

$0.000120

Support: $0.000082 (current price / recent low), $0.000055 (approximate 24h open based on change)
Resistance: $0.000100 (psychological round number), $0.000138 (approximate 24h high extrapolated from +221% move)

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

bearish

Without a verified contract, meaningful utility, or deep liquidity, Silver Inu faces the typical lifecycle of a StonkFun meme launch: an initial pump followed by gradual or rapid decline as early participants exit. The FDV of ~$80K is extremely small, limiting institutional interest. Sustained growth would require significant community development and liquidity injection.

Catalysts

Unexpected viral social media traction driving new buyer inflows
Liquidity pool expansion by the development team
Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all small-caps
Listing on a mid-tier CEX (unlikely at this FDV)

Bullish factors

Strong 24h volume (~$348K) relative to tiny FDV (~$80K) shows active trading interest
Near-equal buyer/seller counts (917 buyers vs. 812 sellers) with slightly more buy transactions (2,499 buys vs. 2,240 sells)
931 unique wallets active in 24h suggests broad participation for a micro-cap
Mutable flag is false, meaning token metadata cannot be changed post-deployment

Bearish factors

Extremely shallow liquidity ($38.1K) — high slippage risk on any meaningful trade
Unverified contract — no independent audit or verification
OHLC candle data shows catastrophic price discrepancy ($64 high vs. $0.000082 current) — strong manipulation or data integrity signal
Launched on StonkFun with minimal social presence (only a website link)
6h and 24h price change both show 0% in analytics despite 221% 24h change — data inconsistency raises reliability concerns
Update authority not renounced (held by 5CEbueQnq1Ym2uSSx2xXds3jQAqT1BDnkA59RZobSPAG)
FDV of ~$80K is micro-cap with very limited exit liquidity

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) severely anomalous OHLC data showing $64+ highs vs. $0.000082 current price — these figures are irreconcilable and suggest data corruption or extreme manipulation; (2) no sniper data available; (3) no holder distribution data; (4) extremely shallow liquidity making price highly manipulable. Any price target is speculative.

SILVERINU call history

Full track record →

Aug 13bearish@ $0.0000817

24h-88.5%

7d—

30d-93.0%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 8B8Hvf...vhTe
Total Supply: 969,995,550.35

Key Risks

Critically shallow liquidity ($38.1K) — extreme slippage and exit risk
Anomalous OHLC data ($64+ highs vs. $0.000082 current) — possible price manipulation or data feed corruption
Unverified contract with unknown mint/freeze authority status
Update authority not renounced — creator retains administrative control

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available, and they reveal a deeply anomalous pattern. Candle [2] (17:00 UTC): O=$0.01548, H=$65.09, L=$0.01547, C=$0.01552 — an enormous wick to $65.09 with open and close both near $0.0155, forming a classic 'shooting star' or extreme upper-wick candle. Candle [1] (18:00 UTC): O=$0.01551, H=$64.52, L=$0.01551, C=$64.25 — opens near the prior close but closes at $64.25, suggesting the price somehow sustained near the wick high. However, the current live price of $0.000082 is ~99.9% below these candle values, indicating either a catastrophic post-candle collapse, severe data corruption, or price feed manipulation. These candles cannot be used reliably for standard technical analysis.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

Based on the live price of $0.000082 being ~99.9% below the most recent candle close of $64.25, the dominant trend is sharply downward. The 5-minute price change of -0.265% confirms continued near-term selling pressure. The 24h change of +221% suggests the token pumped from an even lower base, but the current trajectory appears to be declining from peak levels.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000082 (current price, recent trading floor)

Major support

$0.000055 (approximate pre-pump price based on 221% gain from ~$0.0000254 base)

Immediate resistance

$0.000100 (psychological level)

Major resistance

$0.000138 (approximate 24h high based on +221% move from open)

Key levels are derived from the live price and the 24h percentage change, as the OHLC candle data is anomalous and unreliable for standard level identification. The current price of $0.000082 acts as immediate support. A recovery above $0.000100 would be the first bullish signal. The major resistance is the approximate 24h high. The candle highs of $64–$65 are treated as data artifacts and excluded from actionable level analysis.

Notable patterns

Extreme upper-wick shooting star on candle [2] — bearish reversal signal (if data is valid)
Blow-off top pattern: massive volume spike followed by declining volume
Price-candle disconnect: live price ~99.9% below most recent candle close — data anomaly or post-candle collapse
Near-perfectly balanced buy/sell pressure suggesting distribution phase
Hour-over-hour volume decline (~31%) following price spike — classic exhaustion pattern

Liquidity

$38,102.20

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $38.1K on a single Raydium pool (HdYhiRz26k81yTbpM8GgmGTprzuiavNeqQ7FLU2WP3RD). The 24h trading volume of ~$348K is approximately 9x the total liquidity, meaning the pool is being turned over many times per day — a hallmark of high-volatility micro-cap trading with extreme slippage risk. Any trade above a few hundred dollars will move the price significantly. Sell volume ($175.09K) slightly exceeds buy volume ($172.99K), indicating a marginal net outflow. However, buyer count (917) exceeds seller count (812), suggesting more individual buyers but larger average sell sizes — a potential distribution pattern. The 24h transaction counts (2,499 buys, 2,240 sells) show active but not overwhelming trading activity for a token of this size.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

969,995,550.35

FDV

$79,283.72

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
221% 24h price surge with OHLC candles showing $64+ highs vs. $0.000082 current price — extreme volatility. The 1h price change of 415,092% in the analytics data is almost certainly a data artifact but reflects the chaotic price action. 5-minute decline already underway.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of only $38.1K on a single Raydium pool. 24h volume (~$348K) is ~9x the liquidity pool size. Any meaningful position exit will cause severe price impact and slippage.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Critically shallow liquidity ($38.1K) — extreme slippage and exit risk
Anomalous OHLC data ($64+ highs vs. $0.000082 current) — possible price manipulation or data feed corruption
Unverified contract with unknown mint/freeze authority status
Update authority not renounced — creator retains administrative control
Micro-cap FDV (~$80K) with no verified utility or ecosystem integration
Launched on StonkFun — minimal vetting, high rug/abandon risk
No holder distribution data available — concentration risk cannot be assessed
Data inconsistencies (0% 6h/24h change in analytics vs. 221% 24h change) undermine data reliability

Mitigating factors

Mutable flag is false — token metadata cannot be changed post-deployment
Near-balanced buy/sell pressure suggests no single actor is dominating the order flow
931 unique wallets active in 24h shows broad participation for a micro-cap
No sniper concentration detected (though data may be absent rather than zero)
Possible spam flag is false per metadata

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced DeFi traders who fully understand the risks of micro-cap meme tokens, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of executing rapid entries and exits in low-liquidity environments. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone allocating more than a negligible speculative position. This is NOT financial advice.

Silver Inu is a high-risk micro-cap meme token on Solana with a ~$80K FDV, launched on StonkFun. It has experienced a 221% 24h price surge but shows multiple red flags: anomalous OHLC data, critically shallow liquidity, unverified contract, and unknown authority status. The token offers a pure speculative play with no verified utility, and the risk/reward profile is extremely unfavorable for most investors.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Viral meme momentum drives sustained buying pressure, liquidity deepens, and the token achieves a 5–10x from current levels (~$400K–$800K FDV), attracting broader Solana meme coin community attention.

Continued organic social media virality beyond the initial StonkFun launch
Liquidity pool expansion by the team or community LPs
Broader Solana meme coin market rally (e.g., SOL price appreciation lifting all meme tokens)
Community-driven utility development or NFT integration

Base Case

The token stabilizes at a lower price level (30–60% below current) as initial excitement fades, trading volume declines to a trickle, and the token enters a prolonged low-activity phase typical of micro-cap meme launches.

No rug pull or liquidity removal in the near term
A small core community continues to hold and trade
No major catalysts (positive or negative) emerge in the next 30 days
Liquidity remains at current shallow levels without significant expansion

Bear Case

High probability

Liquidity is withdrawn or drained, early holders dump into thin order books, and the token loses 80–99% of its current value, effectively going to zero as trading activity dries up.

Shallow liquidity ($38.1K) makes the token extremely vulnerable to coordinated selling
Unverified contract and unknown authority status — potential rug pull vector
Post-pump distribution: sell volume already slightly exceeds buy volume
No verified utility or ecosystem integration to sustain long-term demand
Anomalous price data may indicate prior manipulation that has already unwound

Analysis details

Generated

Aug 13, 06:47 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-08-13 18:47 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (Solana SPL token program)
Price feed and 24h analytics (trading analytics endpoint)
OHLC candle data (hourly, 2 candles available)
Raydium liquidity pool data (pair: HdYhiRz26k81yTbpM8GgmGTprzuiavNeqQ7FLU2WP3RD)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
OHLC candle data shows severe anomalies ($64+ highs vs. $0.000082 current price) that undermine reliability
Holder distribution and whale map data unavailable — concentration risk cannot be quantified
Sniper analysis returned no data — early buyer behavior unknown
Mint and freeze authority status not explicitly provided in metadata
Data inconsistencies (0% 6h/24h change in analytics vs. 221% 24h change) suggest possible data feed issues
The 1h price change of 415,092% in analytics is almost certainly a data artifact
Token is unverified — on-chain claims cannot be independently validated

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The anomalous data present in this token's feeds significantly reduces analytical confidence. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. Past price performance does not guarantee future results.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Silver Inu (SILVERINU) a scam?

Unhosted found some red flags. None proves a scam on its own. Every transfer, buys and sells alike, pays a 3% fee. There is very little liquidity in the pool. Checked Nov 11, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Silver Inu (SILVERINU)?

Yes. Every buy and sell pays a 3% transfer fee. Checked Nov 11, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

What is the short-term price outlook for Silver Inu (SILVERINU)?

Is SILVERINU a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced DeFi traders who fully understand the risks of micro-cap meme tokens, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of executing rapid entries and exits in low-liquidity environments. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone allocating more than a negligible speculative position. This is NOT financial advice.

What are the key risks of holding SILVERINU?

Critically shallow liquidity ($38.1K) — extreme slippage and exit risk • Anomalous OHLC data ($64+ highs vs. $0.000082 current) — possible price manipulation or data feed corruption • Unverified contract with unknown mint/freeze authority status