BLAST

InfinityBlast Price Prediction 2026

BLAST
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 22, 2026

86tY3bAzwv2krNSkG5uzHnFJD4NP8M1PodyrpyRQpump

$0.051865

-0.46%

FDV $1,862

LiveContract:86tY3bAzwv2krNSkG5uzHnFJD4NP8M1PodyrpyRQpumpChain:SolanaHolders:261Market cap:$1,862

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about BLAST

Report snapshotas of Jun 22, 03:47 AM
FDV

$44,335

Liquidity

$32,549

Holders

377

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

InfinityBlast (BLAST) is a micro-cap Solana meme/gaming token launched on PumpSwap with a fully diluted valuation of ~$44.3K and total liquidity of ~$32.6K. The token describes itself as a browser-based arena shooter where in-game kills translate to shares of a reward pool. On-chain data reveals a very young, highly volatile token with extreme sell pressure (74.4% of 24h volume), a rapidly declining holder count (-37% in 24h after a brief spike), and no top-holder or sniper data available. The token is unverified and carries very high risk.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Extremely small market cap (~$44.3K FDV) with shallow liquidity (~$32.6K)
Sell pressure dominates at 74.4% of 24h volume vs 25.6% buy pressure
Holder count collapsed -37% in 24h (from ~518 implied to 377) after a spike to 450 on June 20
Token was dormant at 68 holders for ~28 days before a sudden surge on June 19-20, suggesting coordinated activity
No top holder data, no sniper data, and unknown update authority — significant transparency gaps

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
24–72 hours

Price has declined from a 24h high near $0.0000661 (candle 22 high) to the current $0.0000443, a drop of ~33% from peak. Sell pressure at 74.4% of volume and a -37% holder count drop in 24h signal continued distribution. The most recent two candles (hours 1–2) both closed at their lows, a bearish sign. Short-term bias is bearish unless buy volume recovers sharply.

Target low$0.0000325
Target high$0.0000515
Support: $0.0000379 (candle 17 low / candle 23 low area), $0.0000325 (candle 15 absolute low)
Resistance: $0.0000515 (candle 4 high / candle 14 high cluster), $0.0000591 (candle 7 high / candle 21 high cluster)

Medium term

bearish
1–4 weeks

The token was stagnant at 68 holders for ~28 days before a sudden spike, suggesting the initial pump was event-driven or coordinated. With holders now declining and sell pressure dominant, a sustained recovery requires new catalysts (game launch, exchange listing, community growth). Without these, price is likely to drift lower toward all-time low support.

Catalysts
  • Actual game launch or playable beta driving organic user acquisition
  • Broader Solana meme/gaming sector rally
  • Influencer or community-driven attention spike
  • Liquidity deepening above $100K to reduce slippage risk

Bullish factors

  • 24h price is up +5% on the day (from prior close)
  • 7-day holder growth of +309 (+82%) shows the token attracted new participants recently
  • Gaming/utility narrative (browser shooter with reward pool) provides a differentiated story
  • Liquidity of $32.6K is non-trivial relative to the $44.3K FDV

Bearish factors

  • 74.4% sell pressure in 24h ($84.5K sell vs $29.2K buy volume)
  • Holder count dropped -141 (-37%) in 24h — rapid distribution
  • Price down -13.1% over 24h and -16.2% over 6h
  • Token was dormant for ~28 days at 68 holders — suspicious activation pattern
  • No top holder transparency, no sniper data, unverified contract, unknown update authority
  • Extremely shallow market: FDV $44.3K, liquidity $32.6K — high slippage and exit risk
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to missing top-holder data, missing sniper data, unknown update authority, very shallow liquidity, and the token's extremely short active trading history (meaningful activity only since June 19). Price action is highly erratic with large intra-candle wicks, making reliable target-setting difficult.

BLAST call history

Full track record →
Jun 22bearish
24h-40.0%
7d-79.6%
30d-95.1%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

24 hourly candles reviewed (June 21 04:00 UTC through June 22 03:00 UTC). The token peaked at $0.0000843 (candle 22 high, June 21 06:00 UTC) and has been in a consistent downtrend since. The most recent two candles (hours 1 and 2) both closed exactly at their session lows — a bearish signal indicating no intra-candle recovery. Candle 22 showed the largest volume (16,080 USD) and a massive upper wick from $0.0000575 open to $0.0000843 high, closing at $0.0000612 — a classic 'shooting star' or bearish reversal candle at the top. Subsequent candles show lower highs and lower lows overall, confirming a downtrend. Volume has been declining from the 16K peak toward 263 USD in the most recent candle, indicating fading interest.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 26%Sell 74%

Short and medium-term trend is clearly bearish. Price has made a series of lower highs since the June 21 06:00 UTC peak of $0.0000843. The 24h close is near the lower end of the 24h range. No meaningful higher-high structure has formed since the initial spike.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000437 (candle 2 low / current price area)
Major$0.0000325 (candle 15 absolute 24h low)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0000515 (candle 4 high / candle 14 high cluster)
Major$0.0000661 (candle 22 area / candle 19 high)

Immediate support is the current price zone around $0.0000437–$0.0000443. A break below this opens a path to the $0.0000325 major support (the lowest low in the dataset). Immediate resistance is the $0.0000515 area where multiple candles topped out. Major resistance is the $0.0000661 zone from the June 21 09:00 UTC candle high, with the absolute peak at $0.0000843 being a distant target.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / bearish reversal candle at the top (candle 22, June 21 06:00 UTC): high wick to $0.0000843, close at $0.0000612
  • Consecutive candles closing at session lows (candles 1 and 2, most recent hours) — bearish momentum
  • Volume climax at the top followed by steadily declining volume — classic distribution pattern
  • Lower highs and lower lows since the June 21 06:00 UTC peak — confirmed downtrend structure
  • Large intra-candle wicks throughout (e.g. candle 6: open $0.0000573, high $0.0000624, low $0.0000419, close $0.0000455) indicating high volatility and thin liquidity

Total holders377
24h Δ-37
7d Δ+82
30d Δ+82
Accelerating Growth
No

Correlation with price

The holder spike on June 19–20 (from 68 to 450, +382 holders) coincided with the price pump visible in the OHLC data (price reaching $0.0000843 high on June 21 06:00 UTC). The subsequent holder decline of -141 (-37%) in 24h mirrors the price decline of -13.1% over 24h, suggesting holders who bought during the pump are now exiting — a classic pump-and-dump correlation pattern.

Holder data reveals a highly suspicious pattern: the token sat at exactly 68 holders for approximately 28 consecutive days (May 23 through June 18), then suddenly gained 76 holders on June 19 (+53%), 306 on June 20 (+68%), before losing 32 on June 21 (-7.7%) and a further 141 in the most recent 24h (-37%). The 7d and 30d growth figures are both +82% (+309 holders), but this is entirely driven by the June 19–20 spike. The current trend is sharply declining. Growth is not accelerating — it is reversing. The 28-day dormancy period followed by a sudden coordinated spike is a significant red flag, potentially indicating a coordinated launch or wash-trading event.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available from the data provider

0.00%

No top holder data is available for this token — the data provider returned no results for the top 20 holders list, and supply concentration metrics show 0% for both top 10 and top 100 (likely a data gap rather than true zero concentration). This is a significant transparency gap. Without whale map data, it is impossible to assess concentration risk, insider holdings, or whether any single entity controls a dominant share of supply. Given the token's suspicious dormancy-then-spike holder pattern and extreme sell pressure, the absence of holder data is itself a risk signal. Distribution health is classified as 'very_concentrated' as a conservative assumption given the data gap and the token's micro-cap, early-stage nature.

Liquidity$32,550
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$29,170
Sell$84,540
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers203
Unique sellers662

Liquidity is extremely shallow at $32.6K on PumpSwap (pair 3B4Z7LF6zkU4mBk9YzQnd8w5c2BAdvE3sjWwsedrWFxw). The FDV of $44.3K is only marginally above the liquidity pool size, meaning any meaningful sell order will cause severe slippage. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: sell volume ($84.5K) is 2.9x buy volume ($29.2K), with 662 unique sellers vs only 203 unique buyers. This represents a clear outflow environment. The ratio of sellers to buyers (3.26:1) is alarming and consistent with a token in active distribution/dump phase. Total 24h volume of ~$113.7K is very high relative to the $32.6K liquidity pool, indicating the pool has been churned multiple times over — further evidence of high slippage risk for any remaining holders.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,893,722.50
FDV$44,335

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is ~999.9M tokens (effectively 1 billion). The FDV is $44.3K at the current price of $0.0000443. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and the contract is unverified. The token is marked as 'mutable: false' which is a mild positive signal (metadata cannot be changed), but without confirmed mint/freeze authority renouncement, the risk from authorities cannot be fully assessed. The 'pump' suffix in the mint address (86tY3bAzwv2krNSkG5uzHnFJD4NP8M1PodyrpyRQpump) indicates this token was launched via pump.fun, which typically handles authority renouncement automatically upon bonding curve completion — however, this cannot be confirmed from the available data alone. Rug risk from authorities is classified as 'unknown' pending verification.

Volatility
high

Price swung from $0.0000325 to $0.0000843 within 24 hours — a 159% range. Intra-candle wicks are massive relative to candle bodies throughout the dataset. This is extreme volatility typical of micro-cap tokens with thin liquidity.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity is only $32.6K. The 24h volume of ~$113.7K has churned the pool 3.5x over. Any position of meaningful size will face severe slippage on entry or exit. The liquidity-to-FDV ratio is dangerously low.

Concentration
high

No top holder data is available, making concentration risk impossible to quantify. The 28-day dormancy at exactly 68 holders followed by a sudden spike suggests possible insider/coordinated activity. The absence of data is itself a risk signal.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data is available. However, the sell-to-buy ratio of 3.26:1 (662 sellers vs 203 buyers) and the -37% holder decline in 24h are consistent with early participants dumping on later buyers. The risk of ongoing dump activity is high.

Authority
medium

Update authority is 'unknown'. The token is unverified. The 'mutable: false' flag is a mild positive. The pump.fun launch mechanism typically renounces authorities, but this cannot be confirmed. Classified as medium rather than high given the pump.fun context.

Key risks

  • Extreme sell pressure: 74.4% of 24h volume is sells, with 662 sellers vs 203 buyers
  • Holder count collapsed -37% in 24h — active distribution phase
  • Shallow liquidity ($32.6K) creates severe slippage risk for any exit
  • 28-day dormancy at 68 holders followed by sudden spike — suspicious coordinated activity pattern
  • No top holder data available — concentration risk cannot be assessed
  • Unverified contract and unknown update authority
  • Micro-cap FDV ($44.3K) makes the token highly susceptible to manipulation
  • No sniper data available — early buyer behavior unknown

Mitigating factors

  • Token launched via pump.fun (mint address suffix), which typically auto-renounces mint/freeze authority
  • Mutable: false flag suggests metadata cannot be altered
  • 'Possible spam: false' classification from the data provider
  • Gaming/utility narrative provides a potential organic use case if the game is real and functional
  • Social links (Twitter, website, Moralis) suggest some level of project presence
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with micro-cap Solana token risks. Position sizing should be minimal if any exposure is taken.

BLAST is a high-risk micro-cap gaming token on Solana with a compelling narrative (browser-based shooter with on-chain reward pools) but deeply concerning on-chain metrics. The token exhibits classic pump-and-dump characteristics: a 28-day dormancy period, a sudden coordinated holder spike, a sharp price pump to $0.0000843, and now a rapid unwinding with 74.4% sell pressure and -37% holder decline in 24h. The investment case hinges entirely on whether the game is real, functional, and capable of driving organic user growth — none of which can be verified from on-chain data alone.

Bull case (low)

The InfinityBlast game launches or gains significant traction, driving organic player acquisition and genuine demand for $BLAST tokens as reward pool participants. A broader Solana gaming/meme sector rally amplifies the move. Liquidity deepens as the project gains credibility.

  • Verifiable, playable game with real reward pool mechanics
  • Organic community growth beyond the initial spike
  • Solana gaming sector narrative momentum
  • Influencer or media coverage driving new buyer inflow
  • Liquidity pool growth reducing slippage risk

Base case

Price stabilizes in the $0.0000380–$0.0000480 range as the initial distribution phase completes. A small core community remains. Occasional volume spikes occur on social media activity but no sustained trend develops. The token trades as a speculative micro-cap with high volatility and low liquidity.

  • Distribution phase completes within 48–72 hours as weak hands exit
  • A floor of ~200–250 committed holders remains
  • The game project maintains some social media presence
  • No major new catalyst (positive or negative) emerges in the near term
  • Liquidity remains in the $15K–$35K range

Bear case (high)

The token continues its current distribution trajectory. Early participants (the 68 original holders from the dormancy period) continue selling into any rallies. Liquidity drains, price approaches the $0.0000325 support, and the token becomes illiquid and abandoned.

  • Continued 3:1 seller-to-buyer ratio with no reversal
  • Further holder count decline below 300
  • No verifiable game launch or utility demonstration
  • Liquidity pool shrinking below $10K making exit impossible for larger holders
  • Broader Solana market downturn reducing risk appetite for micro-caps

GeneratedJun 22, 03:47 AM
Data freshnessMost recent candle: 2026-06-22T03:00:00.000Z. Holder data current as of analysis time. Price data current as of analysis time.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (Solana blockchain)
  • PumpSwap DEX pair data (pair 3B4Z7LF6zkU4mBk9YzQnd8w5c2BAdvE3sjWwsedrWFxw)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (24 candles)
  • Trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • Historical holder metrics (30-day daily series)
  • Holder distribution and acquisition data
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • No top holder data available — concentration risk cannot be quantified
  • No sniper data available — early buyer behavior and PnL state unknown
  • Update authority status is 'unknown' — mint/freeze authority renouncement cannot be confirmed
  • Contract is unverified — smart contract risk cannot be assessed
  • Only 24 hours of OHLC data available — longer-term technical analysis not possible
  • The token's described utility (browser game) cannot be verified from on-chain data alone
  • Holder distribution metrics (whales/sharks/dolphins/fish/octopus) all show 0 — likely a data gap
  • Supply concentration shows 0% for top 10 and top 100 — likely a data gap, not true zero concentration
  • The 28-day dormancy period at exactly 68 holders may indicate data collection artifacts or genuine dormancy

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed is sourced from on-chain records and third-party providers and may contain errors or gaps. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decision. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,893,722.50

Key Risks

Extreme sell pressure: 74.4% of 24h volume is sells, with 662 sellers vs 203 buyers
Holder count collapsed -37% in 24h — active distribution phase
Shallow liquidity ($32.6K) creates severe slippage risk for any exit
28-day dormancy at 68 holders followed by sudden spike — suspicious coordinated activity pattern

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for BLAST. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper activity. The broader trading data does show 662 unique sellers vs 203 unique buyers in 24h, and sell volume ($84.5K) is nearly 3x buy volume ($29.2K), suggesting early participants or insiders may be distributing. However, without sniper-specific data, this cannot be confirmed.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available — the sniper analysis endpoint returned no results for this token.

Cannot be determined from available data. The token was dormant at 68 holders for ~28 days before a sudden activation on June 19–20, which may indicate coordinated early buyer activity, but no on-chain sniper records are available to confirm PnL state.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for InfinityBlast (BLAST)?

Price has declined from a 24h high near $0.0000661 (candle 22 high) to the current $0.0000443, a drop of ~33% from peak. Sell pressure at 74.4% of volume and a -37% holder count drop in 24h signal continued distribution. The most recent two candles (hours 1–2) both closed at their lows, a bearish sign. Short-term bias is bearish unless buy volume recovers sharply. Short-term outlook is bearish (24–72 hours), with a target range of $0.0000325 to $0.0000515.

Is BLAST a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with micro-cap Solana token risks. Position sizing should be minimal if any exposure is taken.

How are BLAST holders trending?

InfinityBlast currently has 377 holders and is declining (24h: -37, 7d: 82, 30d: 82). Holder data reveals a highly suspicious pattern: the token sat at exactly 68 holders for approximately 28 consecutive days (May 23 through June 18), then suddenly gained 76 holders on June 19 (+53%), 306 on June 20 (+68%), before losing 32 on June 21 (-7.7%) and a further 141 in the most recent 24h (-37%). The 7d and 30d growth figures are both +82% (+309 holders), but this is entirely driven by the June 19–20 spike. The current trend is sharply declining. Growth is not accelerating — it is reversing. The 28-day dormancy period followed by a sudden coordinated spike is a significant red flag, potentially indicating a coordinated launch or wash-trading event.

What does sniper activity look like for BLAST?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding BLAST?

Extreme sell pressure: 74.4% of 24h volume is sells, with 662 sellers vs 203 buyers • Holder count collapsed -37% in 24h — active distribution phase • Shallow liquidity ($32.6K) creates severe slippage risk for any exit

Track BLAST