Y2K

Dotcom Price Today & AI Analysis

Y2K
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of May 4, 2026

7voKerVHPvbXde3bEpyNcdodVEufq17tW6eZLUUkpump

$0.000686

-5.14%

FDV $685,575

LiveContract:7voKerVHPvbXde3bEpyNcdodVEufq17tW6eZLUUkpumpChain:SolanaHolders:607Market cap:$685,575

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about Y2K

Report snapshotas of May 4, 02:47 AM
FDV

$933,824

Liquidity

$75,459

Holders

404

Snipers

25

Risk

High

AI Executive Summary

Dotcom (Y2K) is a Solana meme/nostalgia token launched on PumpSwap with a total supply of ~1B tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$933.8K at the current price of $0.000934. The token's Y2K/dotcom-era branding taps into retro-internet nostalgia. It has 404 holders, moderate liquidity of $75.46K, and has posted a strong 24h gain of ~29%. However, the token exhibits heavy sell pressure (79.7% sell volume), concentrated ownership (top 10 hold 43.39%), and a declining holder base over the past 30 days — all meaningful red flags.

Risk: High
Sentiment: Neutral
Nostalgia-driven Y2K/dotcom branding with active social presence (Discord, Telegram, Twitter, website)
Strong 24h price appreciation of ~29% driven by a single high-volume candle at 08:00 UTC on May 3
Verified contract with mutable=false metadata, reducing some rug risk
PumpSwap listing with $75.46K total liquidity
Very small holder base of 404 wallets with net 30-day decline

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term

neutral
24–72 hours

After a sharp spike from ~$0.000730 to a high of ~$0.001580 on May 3 08:00 UTC, price has retraced and is consolidating around $0.000934. The 79.7% sell pressure and 618 sells vs 113 buys in the past 24h suggest continued distribution. Short-term direction is neutral-to-bearish unless new buying catalysts emerge.

Target low$0.000865
Target high$0.000970
Support: $0.000865 (candle [3] low), $0.000871 (candle [4] low), $0.000730 (pre-spike base, candle [20])
Resistance: $0.000970 (candle [3] high), $0.001029 (candle [15] high), $0.001168 (candle [18] high), $0.001580 (candle [19] all-time spike high)

Medium term

bearish
1–4 weeks

The 30-day holder trend is net negative (-3 holders, -0.74%), liquidity is shallow at $75.46K, and sniper wallets are predominantly at a loss with little incentive to hold. Without a sustained catalyst or community growth, the token is likely to drift lower or remain range-bound. A recovery above $0.001000 would require meaningful new buyer inflow.

Catalysts
  • Community-driven marketing campaigns leveraging Y2K nostalgia theme
  • Broader Solana meme-coin market rally
  • New exchange listings or partnership announcements
  • Influencer attention on social platforms

Bullish factors

  • 29% 24h price gain demonstrates speculative momentum
  • Verified contract and mutable=false metadata reduce rug risk
  • Active social channels (Discord, Telegram, Twitter, website) suggest ongoing community effort
  • Y2K nostalgia narrative has broad cultural appeal in crypto cycles
  • Price holding above pre-spike base (~$0.000730)

Bearish factors

  • 79.7% sell volume vs 20.3% buy volume in past 24h — heavy distribution
  • 618 sells vs 113 buys — sellers outnumber buyers ~5.5:1
  • Net holder decline over 30 days (-3 holders, -0.74%)
  • Top 10 wallets hold 43.39% of supply — extreme concentration risk
  • Single wallet holds 25.39% of supply
  • Shallow liquidity ($75.46K) makes price highly manipulable
  • Majority of snipers (16/20) are at a realized loss, suggesting early buyers are underwater
  • Spike candle volume ($30,197) dwarfs all other candles — likely a single large event, not organic growth
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the meme-coin nature of the token, thin liquidity ($75.46K), a very small holder base (404 wallets), and the fact that the 24h price spike appears driven by a single anomalous candle (candle [19]: volume $30,197 vs typical <$2,000). Price action is highly susceptible to single-wallet moves.

Deep Analysis

The 21-hour OHLC series reveals a dramatic spike-and-fade pattern. Candle [19] (May 3 08:00 UTC) is the defining event: price surged from an open of $0.000748 to a high of $0.001580 — a 111% intra-candle move — on massive volume of $30,197 (vs. typical candle volume of $100–$2,100). Price then faded to close at $0.001127. Subsequent candles [18] through [11] show a steady staircase decline from $0.001168 down to $0.000897, with each candle posting lower highs and lower lows — a classic post-spike distribution pattern. Candle [3] (May 4 00:00 UTC) shows a partial recovery attempt (L: $0.000866, H: $0.000970, C: $0.000965) with elevated volume ($1,867), suggesting some buying interest at support. The most recent candle [1] is a doji-like single-price candle at $0.000934 with minimal volume ($17.74), indicating indecision.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
neutral

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 20%Sell 80%

Short-term trend is a downtrend from the $0.001580 spike high, with price making lower highs across candles [19]→[18]→[15]→[13]→[11]. Medium-term (pre-spike baseline) was sideways in the $0.000722–$0.000731 range before the spike event.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000865 (candle [3] low / candle [4] low cluster)
Major$0.000730 (pre-spike base, candles [20]–[21])
Resistance
Immediate$0.000970 (candle [3] high)
Major$0.001168 (candle [18] high / post-spike distribution zone)

The $0.000865–$0.000871 zone has been tested multiple times and represents near-term support. A break below $0.000865 opens the path to the pre-spike base at $0.000730. On the upside, $0.000970 is the first meaningful resistance, followed by the $0.001029–$0.001168 distribution zone where heavy selling occurred post-spike.

Notable patterns

  • Spike-and-fade: Candle [19] shows a 111% intra-candle range with massive volume — classic pump event
  • Post-spike staircase decline: Candles [18]→[11] form a series of lower highs and lower lows
  • Volume climax: Candle [19] volume ($30,197) is ~14x the next highest candle — volume exhaustion signal
  • Partial recovery doji: Candle [1] is a flat single-price candle at $0.000934 with near-zero volume — indecision
  • Candle [3] recovery attempt: Bull-leaning candle with H:$0.000970, C:$0.000965 on $1,867 volume — modest buying interest at support

Total holders404
24h Δ+1.5
7d Δ-0.25
30d Δ-0.74
Accelerating Growth
No

Correlation with price

Weak inverse correlation observed: the 29% price spike on May 3 coincided with only a +1 holder gain on that day (May 3: 398 total, +1 net). The peak holder count in the 30-day window was 424 on April 14, which has since declined to 404 — a loss of 20 holders (-4.7%) from the local peak. Price appreciation has not translated into meaningful new holder acquisition.

The holder base is in a gentle but persistent decline over the 30-day window. Starting from 403 holders on April 4, the count peaked at 424 on April 14 (+5.2%), then trended down to 404 by May 3–4. The 7-day change is -1 (-0.25%) and the 30-day change is -3 (-0.74%). Daily fluctuations are small (typically ±1–5 holders), and there is no sign of acceleration in either direction. The 24h gain of +6 holders (1.50%) is the most positive recent signal, potentially reflecting the price spike attracting some new buyers, but this needs to be sustained to reverse the trend. With only 404 total holders, the community base is very small and fragile.

Top 10 hold43.39%
Top 100 hold86.97%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

27bihPRcKP36YiNq4A1eLjfUCNfYDT52EsmdhjLGN8BQ

Individual whale or project insider — holds 25.39% of supply (253.85M tokens), an extraordinarily large single-wallet concentration. No on-chain classification available; could be a team/treasury wallet or a large early buyer.

25.39%

FzXPKq9fGpJ6EHtBGsMX31nmNSPWEaSx7t4453Rdyc3j

DEX liquidity pool — this address matches the PumpSwap pair address listed in the PRICE section (Pair: FzXPKq9fGpJ6EHtBGsMX31nmNSPWEaSx7t4453Rdyc3j), confirming it is the AMM liquidity pool contract.

4.01%

6kexxg5b6cQ9Ww4snFKBMci7xw3RhigvJMx1nA9axEac

Individual whale — holds 3.01% of supply (30.1M tokens). No further on-chain classification available.

3.01%

AGLHSWKpGARwhQxkwjSZgmwuHhmp671skCsaEUuBGapk

Individual whale — holds 2.00% of supply (20.0M tokens). Round balance suggests possible OTC purchase or structured allocation.

2.00%

9N31Vxe2GLxWE62nbWMsPhue5PeyRCHWvb4o8jqvAyGE

Individual whale — holds 1.99% of supply (19.94M tokens). Near-round balance, possibly a structured allocation or early buyer.

1.99%

Token distribution is extremely concentrated. The single largest wallet (27bihPRcKP36...) holds 25.39% of total supply — a critical risk factor, as a single sell decision from this wallet could devastate price and liquidity. The top 10 wallets collectively hold 43.39% of supply, and the top 100 hold 86.97%, leaving only ~13% of supply distributed among the remaining holders. The PumpSwap LP (FzXPKq9fGpJ6...) accounts for 4.01% as expected. Several wallets hold near-round balances (20.0M, 10.4M, 8.0M tokens), which may indicate structured allocations. Whale sentiment is mixed — the dominant whale has not sold (balance intact at 25.39%), but the overall sell pressure in trading data suggests smaller holders are distributing.

Liquidity$75,460
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$9,650
Sell$38,000
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers41
Unique sellers208

Market health is poor. Total liquidity of $75.46K is shallow relative to the FDV of $933.8K (liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~8%), meaning any meaningful position size will incur significant slippage. The 24h trading data reveals a severe imbalance: $38,000 in sell volume vs $9,650 in buy volume (79.7% sell pressure), with 208 unique sellers vs only 41 unique buyers. This 5:1 seller-to-buyer ratio indicates active distribution. The net flow is clearly outflow. The 618 sell transactions vs 113 buy transactions further confirms that holders are exiting. Despite the 29% 24h price gain (driven by the spike candle), the sustained sell pressure suggests the price appreciation may be fragile and driven by a single large buy event rather than broad market demand.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,999,995.824877 (effectively 1 billion)
FDV$933,824.11

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token has a total supply of ~1 billion with 6 decimal places, standard for Solana meme tokens. The FDV of ~$933.8K is modest. The metadata shows mutable=false and master edition=false, which are positive signals — an immutable token cannot have its metadata changed post-deployment. The update authority is TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM, which is NOT the system program (111...1) or a known burn address, meaning the update authority has NOT been renounced. However, since mutable=false, the authority cannot change metadata regardless. Mint authority and freeze authority status are not explicitly provided in the data — these are separate from update authority and cannot be inferred from the metadata fields given. The verified contract flag (true) and possible spam flag (false) are positive indicators. The token is traded on PumpSwap, consistent with a pump.fun-originated token (mint address ends in 'pump').

Volatility
high

The token posted a 111% intra-candle spike (candle [19]) followed by a ~41% retracement from the high. 24h price change of +29% masks extreme intra-day volatility. Thin liquidity amplifies price swings in both directions.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of $75.46K is shallow. The liquidity-to-FDV ratio is ~8%. Any sell order above a few thousand dollars will incur significant slippage. Exiting a meaningful position could move the market substantially against the seller.

Concentration
high

The top wallet holds 25.39% of supply. Top 10 wallets hold 43.39%. Top 100 hold 86.97%. A single large holder decision to sell could collapse the price. The holder base of only 404 wallets is extremely small.

SniperDump
medium

20 snipers were identified in the first 1,000 blocks. Most (16/20) are at a realized loss, suggesting they have already sold or are holding underwater. The remaining sniper balances appear minimal ($0–$2), reducing immediate sniper dump risk. However, the dominant whale (25.39%) poses a larger dump risk than snipers.

Authority
medium

Mint and freeze authority status are unknown from the provided data. The update authority (TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM) has not been renounced, but mutable=false prevents metadata changes. If mint authority is not renounced, new tokens could theoretically be minted, diluting holders. This cannot be confirmed from the available data.

Key risks

  • Single wallet (27bihPRcKP36...) controls 25.39% of supply — extreme dump risk
  • 79.7% sell pressure with 5:1 seller-to-buyer ratio indicates active distribution
  • Shallow liquidity ($75.46K) creates high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Net holder decline over 30 days (-0.74%) — community is not growing
  • Price spike driven by single anomalous candle ($30,197 volume) — not organic demand
  • Mint and freeze authority status unknown — potential hidden rug vectors
  • Only 404 total holders — extremely thin community base
  • Top 100 wallets hold 86.97% of supply — near-total concentration

Mitigating factors

  • Verified contract (true) and possible spam (false) flags from Moralis
  • mutable=false metadata prevents post-deployment metadata manipulation
  • Active social presence across 5 platforms (Discord, Telegram, Twitter, website, Moralis)
  • Most snipers have already exited (at a loss), reducing near-term sniper dump pressure
  • Token has survived 30+ days without apparent rug, suggesting some project longevity
  • PumpSwap listing provides basic AMM liquidity infrastructure
Suitable for: Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who can afford to lose their entire investment. Not suitable for conservative investors, long-term holders, or those without deep familiarity with Solana meme-coin dynamics. Position sizing should be minimal relative to total portfolio.

Dotcom (Y2K) is a high-risk, speculative meme token with a compelling nostalgic narrative but significant structural weaknesses: extreme ownership concentration, declining holder base, shallow liquidity, and overwhelming sell pressure. The 29% 24h gain is largely attributable to a single anomalous spike candle rather than organic demand growth. The token may offer short-term trading opportunities around the Y2K/dotcom narrative, but the risk/reward profile is unfavorable for most investors.

Bull case (low)

The Y2K nostalgia narrative gains viral traction on social media, attracting a wave of new buyers. The dominant whale (25.39%) holds or accumulates, providing price stability. Community growth accelerates past 500+ holders, liquidity deepens, and the token re-tests the $0.001168 resistance zone.

  • Viral social media campaign leveraging Y2K/dotcom nostalgia
  • Broader Solana meme-coin market rally lifting all boats
  • Dominant whale (25.39%) continues to hold, preventing supply overhang
  • New exchange listing or influencer endorsement driving buyer inflow
  • Community milestone events (e.g., anniversary campaigns, partnerships)

Base case

Price consolidates in the $0.000865–$0.000970 range as post-spike distribution continues. Holder count remains flat to slightly declining. The token maintains its social presence but fails to achieve breakout growth. Liquidity stays shallow, and the token gradually fades in trading activity over the next 2–4 weeks.

  • Dominant whale does not sell aggressively in the near term
  • No major new catalysts (positive or negative) emerge
  • Solana meme-coin market remains broadly flat
  • Token maintains its PumpSwap listing and basic liquidity
  • Social channels remain active but do not achieve viral growth

Bear case (high)

The dominant whale (25.39%) begins distributing into any price strength, overwhelming the thin $75.46K liquidity pool. Holder count continues to decline, sell pressure remains dominant, and price retraces to the pre-spike base of $0.000730 or lower. Mint/freeze authority risks materialize.

  • Dominant whale liquidation into thin liquidity
  • Continued 5:1 seller-to-buyer ratio eroding price support
  • Failure to grow holder base beyond 404 wallets
  • Broader Solana meme-coin market downturn
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority risk materializing

GeneratedMay 4, 02:47 AM
Data freshnessData current as of approximately 2026-05-04T02:00 UTC based on the most recent OHLC candle timestamp
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Moralis token metadata API (mint, supply, authorities, social links)
  • On-chain price feed (PumpSwap pair FzXPKq9fGpJ6EHtBGsMX31nmNSPWEaSx7t4453Rdyc3j)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (21 candles, May 3–4 2026)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, unique wallets, price changes)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data (404 holders, top 20 balances)
  • Historical holder series (30 days daily)
  • Sniper analysis (20 snipers, first 1,000 blocks)

Limitations

  • Mint authority and freeze authority status not explicitly provided — cannot confirm rug risk from token supply controls
  • Sniper sniped amounts (USD) and exact balances are unknown for most snipers — sniper concentration percent is estimated
  • No historical price data beyond 21 hourly candles — medium-term technical analysis is limited
  • Wallet classifications (team, treasury, exchange) are inferred, not confirmed on-chain
  • No order book depth data — slippage estimates are approximations based on liquidity pool size
  • Token is very early-stage with only 404 holders — statistical patterns may not be reliable
  • 24h price change of 29% is heavily influenced by a single spike candle, potentially distorting momentum signals

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, particularly meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,999,995.824877 (effectively 1 billion)

Key Risks

Single wallet (27bihPRcKP36...) controls 25.39% of supply — extreme dump risk
79.7% sell pressure with 5:1 seller-to-buyer ratio indicates active distribution
Shallow liquidity ($75.46K) creates high slippage and manipulation risk
Net holder decline over 30 days (-0.74%) — community is not growing

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

Of 20 identified snipers, 16 show negative realized PnL percentages ranging from -8.6% to -47.6%. Only 3 snipers show positive realized PnL (snipers [4]: +2.3%, [16]: +1.9%, [1]: 0.0%). The majority of snipers appear to have sold at a loss, indicating the token did not deliver the typical sniper-friendly pump immediately after launch. Most snipers have near-zero or unknown remaining balances, suggesting they have largely exited. The sell-through rate appears low in terms of remaining sniper holdings, but their realized losses suggest they sold into weakness rather than strength.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration2.00%
PnL stateMostly At Loss
Sell-through rateLow
Profit-taking risk
low

20 snipers identified in first 1,000 blocks; exact sniped supply unknown. Only sniper [1] (3eBxcd1ts7...) and [14] (Gko668hkc5...) show non-zero remaining balances ($0 and $2 respectively), suggesting most snipers have exited or hold negligible positions.

Negative — the majority of early snipers (16/20) are at a realized loss, with losses as severe as -47.6% (sniper [10]: 2Yo2iS2RAZ...) and -46.0% (sniper [5]: 8BX1jBe92Z...). This indicates early buyers did not benefit from the token's price action and likely sold at unfavorable prices.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Dotcom (Y2K)?

After a sharp spike from ~$0.000730 to a high of ~$0.001580 on May 3 08:00 UTC, price has retraced and is consolidating around $0.000934. The 79.7% sell pressure and 618 sells vs 113 buys in the past 24h suggest continued distribution. Short-term direction is neutral-to-bearish unless new buying catalysts emerge. Short-term outlook is neutral (24–72 hours), with a target range of $0.000865 to $0.000970.

Is Y2K a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 8.5/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who can afford to lose their entire investment. Not suitable for conservative investors, long-term holders, or those without deep familiarity with Solana meme-coin dynamics. Position sizing should be minimal relative to total portfolio.

How are Y2K holders trending?

Dotcom currently has 404 holders and is declining (24h: 1.5, 7d: -0.25, 30d: -0.74). The holder base is in a gentle but persistent decline over the 30-day window. Starting from 403 holders on April 4, the count peaked at 424 on April 14 (+5.2%), then trended down to 404 by May 3–4. The 7-day change is -1 (-0.25%) and the 30-day change is -3 (-0.74%). Daily fluctuations are small (typically ±1–5 holders), and there is no sign of acceleration in either direction. The 24h gain of +6 holders (1.50%) is the most positive recent signal, potentially reflecting the price spike attracting some new buyers, but this needs to be sustained to reverse the trend. With only 404 total holders, the community base is very small and fragile.

What does sniper activity look like for Y2K?

Snipers hold roughly 2.00% of supply with PnL state "mostly_at_loss" and sell-through rate "low". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding Y2K?

Single wallet (27bihPRcKP36...) controls 25.39% of supply — extreme dump risk • 79.7% sell pressure with 5:1 seller-to-buyer ratio indicates active distribution • Shallow liquidity ($75.46K) creates high slippage and manipulation risk

Track Y2K