had to take profits sir Price Today & AI Analysis

HTTPSSolanaAnalysis as of May 1, 2026

$0.000127

+4.97% 24h

Contract

Live

7sGdNQSvUGpahh6qyXB3g5gsdK9FAzZM299KyCXspump

Chain

Solana

Holders

4,299

Market cap

$126,602

At a $1M market cap, $HTTPS would be $0.001001 (7.90x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is HTTPS a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 27

Watch insiders

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, but wallets from the launch still hold 36% of the supply.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

36%1 sniper, 1 bundler, 244 insiders still holding

Creator holds

3.5%

Wallets linked to the creator hold a large share.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about HTTPS

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

bukangi부캉이 busan shark$0.0₄3431-18.1%MC $33.5K

TIPTOETip Toe'n in my Jordans$0.0₄7753-8.3%MC $74.9K

GoldGold$0.0₄3098-1.5%MC $29.8K

LEVERCATLeveraged Cat$0.000316+11.6%MC $314.0K

BOTIFYBotify$0.000103+13.0%MC $103.2K

FrongusFrongus$0.000112+170.0%MC $107.7K

had to take profits sir: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-01 09:49 UTC

Holder addresses

2,767

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$22,009.96

How concentrated is had to take profits sir ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 2,767 addresses (2026-05-01 09:49 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling had to take profits sir?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is had to take profits sir liquidity falling?: As of 2026-05-01 09:49 UTC, reported liquidity was $22,009.96. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-01 09:49 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of May 1, 09:49 AM UTC

FDV

$35,935

Liquidity

$22,009.96

Holders

2,767

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

HTTPS ('had to take profits sir') is a Pump.fun-launched meme token on Solana with mint address 7sGdNQSvUGpahh6qyXB3g5gsdK9FAzZM299KyCXspump. The token has experienced a dramatic 359% price surge in the past 24 hours, currently trading at ~$0.0000359. Despite the explosive price action, on-chain data reveals severe sell pressure (80.3% sell volume), extremely shallow liquidity ($22K), and heavy supply concentration (top 10 holders control 53.92%). The token name itself — 'had to take profits sir' — is a self-referential meme that ironically foreshadows the dominant market behavior observed.

Key points

359%+ 24h price surge driven by speculative meme momentum
Extreme sell pressure: 80.3% of 24h volume is sells ($123.36K vs $30.27K buys)
Top 10 holders control 53.92% of supply; top 100 control 92.23%
Zero snipers detected in first 1,000 blocks — no early sniper concentration risk
Only $22K total liquidity on PumpSwap — extremely shallow market depth
Holder base was declining for most of the prior 30 days before a 24h spike of +128

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token is showing severe short-term exhaustion. The 1h price change is already -14.3% despite a 369% 24h gain. Sell pressure dominates at 80.3% of volume. With only $22K in liquidity, any moderate sell order will cause significant slippage. The candle structure shows the price spiked to a high near $0.0000354 (candle [1] low, which appears to be a data anomaly — see technical analysis) and is now pulling back. Short-term direction is bearish with high probability of continued retracement.

Target low

$0.000009

Target high

$0.000045

Support: $0.0000098 (recent consolidation base, candles [1]–[7]), $0.0000087 (pre-pump level, candles [9]–[11]), $0.0000078 (30-day low, candle [14])
Resistance: $0.0000360 (current price / 24h high zone), $0.0000354 (candle [1] low — likely intraday spike high), $0.0000306 (candle [2] low)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

Medium-term outlook is bearish. The holder base was in a slow decline for most of April 2026 (from 2,733 on Apr 1 to 2,640 on Apr 30), suggesting organic interest was waning before this pump. Meme tokens with this profile — shallow liquidity, high concentration, dominant sell pressure — typically retrace 70–95% of pump gains within days to weeks. Sustained recovery would require new catalysts and meaningful liquidity injection.

Catalysts

Viral social media attention driving new buyer inflow
Listing on a centralized exchange (unlikely given current metrics)
Broader Solana meme season momentum
Coordinated community effort to build utility or narrative

Bullish factors

Strong 24h momentum (+359%) may attract additional speculative buyers
Zero sniper concentration means no early whale dump overhang from snipers
Verified contract and not flagged as spam
5m price change still positive (+1.46%) suggesting very short-term buying

Bearish factors

80.3% sell pressure ($123.36K sells vs $30.27K buys) in 24h
Only $22K total liquidity — extreme slippage risk on any meaningful exit
Top 10 holders control 53.92% — concentrated supply creates dump risk
Holder count was declining for most of April before this pump
-14.3% in the last 1 hour signals momentum reversal
Token name itself ('had to take profits sir') signals sell-oriented community sentiment
FDV of only $35–42K suggests minimal institutional interest

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extreme volatility (359% 24h move), very shallow liquidity ($22K), and the meme-driven nature of price action which is inherently unpredictable. OHLC data shows some anomalies (Low values higher than Open/Close in several candles) suggesting data quality issues that further reduce predictive confidence.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 7sGdNQ...pump
Total Supply: 999,820,486.076526

Key Risks

Extreme liquidity risk: $22K pool vs $153K daily volume — severe slippage on exit
Heavy sell pressure: 80.3% of 24h volume is sells; 792 sellers vs 338 buyers
Supply concentration: top 10 (ex-LP) hold ~26% — coordinated dump risk
30-day holder decline prior to pump suggests weak organic community

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 14 hourly candles reveal a dramatic pump event beginning around candle [7] (03:00 UTC May 1). Candles [9]–[14] (Apr 30) show extremely low-volume price discovery in the $0.0000078–$0.0000087 range with near-zero volume (0.5–51 USD), indicating the token was essentially dormant. Candles [1]–[7] (May 1) show a sudden explosion in volume and price. NOTE: The OHLC data appears to have Low and High values inverted in several candles (e.g., candle [1]: O=$0.00000919, H=$0.00000980, L=$0.0000354, C=$0.00000980 — the Low is higher than the High), suggesting the data feed may have the High/Low fields swapped or there is a data quality issue. Interpreting the larger values as the intraday spike highs: the token reached approximately $0.0000354 in candle [1] and $0.0000306 in candle [2], with the open/close oscillating between ~$0.0000092 and $0.0000098. Volume peaked at $106,358 in candle [6] (04:00 UTC) and has been declining since, suggesting the pump climax has passed.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

Short-term trend is turning bearish after the pump climax. The 1h change of -14.3% and declining volume from the $106K peak in candle [6] to $2,628 in candle [1] confirm momentum is fading. Medium-term trend remains down given the 30-day holder decline and pre-pump price stagnation around $0.0000078–$0.0000087.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

20%

Sell

80%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000098 (recent open/close consolidation base in candles [1]–[7])

Major support

$0.0000078 (pre-pump floor, candle [14])

Immediate resistance

$0.0000360 (current price / recent spike zone)

Major resistance

$0.0000354 (intraday spike high from candle [1] low field, interpreted as spike peak)

The key support cluster sits between $0.0000087–$0.0000098, which was the consolidation range during the pump initiation. A break below $0.0000087 would signal a full retracement to pre-pump levels around $0.0000078. Resistance is thin given the shallow liquidity; the $0.0000354–$0.0000306 zone represents the spike highs that will be difficult to reclaim without fresh volume.

Notable patterns

Volume climax at candle [6] ($106K) followed by sharp volume decline — classic pump exhaustion pattern
Price oscillating between two tight levels ($0.0000092 and $0.0000098) in candles [1]–[7] while spike highs were reached — suggests wash trading or bot activity
Pre-pump dormancy: 6 consecutive candles (Apr 30) with volume under $52 USD — token was essentially dead before the pump
Declining volume with elevated price = bearish divergence
Possible data anomaly: Low > High in multiple candles suggests OHLC feed inversion

Liquidity

$22,009.96

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Market health is critically poor. Total liquidity of $22K is dangerously shallow relative to the 24h trading volume of ~$153K — a liquidity-to-volume ratio of roughly 0.14x. This means the pool is being churned at over 7x its depth daily, creating extreme slippage risk for any position of meaningful size. The net flow is strongly negative: $123.36K in sell volume vs $30.27K in buy volume represents an 80.3% sell dominance. Unique sellers (792) outnumber unique buyers (338) by 2.3:1. The token trades on PumpSwap (pair AmK2hPHoHktE2tcJWKbfMpYR3JiMdS3J19xGdHX4ZCLK), a relatively low-liquidity venue. Any holder attempting to exit a position larger than a few hundred dollars will face significant price impact. The FDV discrepancy between the price data ($35,934) and trading analytics ($42,480) suggests price volatility during data collection.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,820,486.076526

FDV

$35,934.58

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
359% 24h price surge followed by -14.3% in the last hour. Extreme intraday volatility with price oscillating between $0.0000078 and $0.0000354+ within 24 hours. Meme token with no fundamental value anchor.
Liquidityhigh
Only $22K total liquidity on PumpSwap. 24h volume of $153K is 7x the liquidity pool depth. Any sell order above a few hundred dollars will cause severe slippage. Exiting a meaningful position is extremely difficult without moving the market against yourself.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme liquidity risk: $22K pool vs $153K daily volume — severe slippage on exit
Heavy sell pressure: 80.3% of 24h volume is sells; 792 sellers vs 338 buyers
Supply concentration: top 10 (ex-LP) hold ~26% — coordinated dump risk
30-day holder decline prior to pump suggests weak organic community
Meme token with no described utility or roadmap
Token name itself signals sell sentiment ('had to take profits sir')
Unknown authority status — cannot confirm rug protection
Post-pump retracement risk: 70–95% drawdowns are common for similar tokens

Mitigating factors

Zero snipers in first 1,000 blocks — no early sniper dump overhang
Verified contract, not flagged as spam
Mutable: false — metadata cannot be changed
Active trading community (836 unique wallets in 24h)
Pump.fun launch mechanism provides some standardization

Suitable for

Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand meme token dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are actively monitoring positions. Absolutely not suitable for long-term investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. This token exhibits nearly every high-risk characteristic: extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, high concentration, dominant sell pressure, and no fundamental value proposition.

HTTPS is a high-risk, meme-driven speculative token on Solana that experienced a 359% pump in 24 hours. The investment case is almost entirely momentum-based with no fundamental underpinning. The token's own name ('had to take profits sir') ironically describes the dominant on-chain behavior. The risk/reward is extremely unfavorable for new entrants at current prices given the shallow liquidity, heavy sell pressure, and concentrated supply.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Viral meme momentum continues to attract new buyers, the community rallies around the self-aware token name, and the token achieves a higher FDV milestone (e.g., $100K–$500K) driven by social media virality.

Viral spread on Crypto Twitter/X driving FOMO buying
Broader Solana meme season with elevated risk appetite
Community coordination to hold and build narrative
New liquidity injection from larger buyers

Base Case

Price consolidates and gradually retraces 50–70% of pump gains over the next 7–14 days, settling in the $0.000010–$0.000018 range as momentum fades and sellers continue to dominate. Holder count stabilizes but does not grow meaningfully.

Sell pressure remains dominant but not catastrophic
Some buyers continue to speculate on meme momentum
Liquidity pool is not fully drained
No major new catalysts emerge in either direction

Bear Case

High probability

Sell pressure overwhelms the shallow $22K liquidity pool, price retraces 80–95% of pump gains back to pre-pump levels ($0.0000078–$0.0000098), and the holder base resumes its prior declining trend.

80.3% sell pressure already dominant in 24h data
Top holders distributing into pump momentum
Only $22K liquidity cannot absorb sustained selling
No fundamental value or utility to attract long-term holders
Historical holder decline throughout April 2026

Analysis details

Generated

May 1, 09:49 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-01 09:49 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

Solana on-chain token metadata (mint: 7sGdNQSvUGpahh6qyXB3g5gsdK9FAzZM299KyCXspump)
PumpSwap DEX pair data (AmK2hPHoHktE2tcJWKbfMpYR3JiMdS3J19xGdHX4ZCLK)
Hourly OHLC candle data (14 candles, USD-denominated)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
Top 20 holder snapshot with balance data
30-day daily historical holder count series
Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks)
Token distribution breakdown (whales/sharks/dolphins/fish/octopus)

Limitations

OHLC data shows apparent High/Low field inversion in multiple candles, reducing technical analysis reliability
Update authority status is 'unknown' — cannot confirm mint/freeze authority renouncement
Sniper data is entirely absent (0 snipers) — cannot assess early smart money behavior beyond this fact
FDV discrepancy between metadata ($35,934) and trading analytics ($42,480) suggests price volatility during data collection
No social sentiment data, developer wallet identification, or vesting schedule information available
Meme token price action is inherently unpredictable and driven by social dynamics not captured in on-chain data alone
30-day holder history only; longer-term context unavailable
No information on team identity, project roadmap, or tokenomics allocation

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, particularly meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is had to take profits sir (HTTPS) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, but wallets from the launch still hold 36% of the supply. Wallets linked to the creator hold a large share. Checked Oct 27, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell had to take profits sir (HTTPS)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 27, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is had to take profits sir ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 2,767 addresses (2026-05-01 09:49 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling had to take profits sir?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is had to take profits sir liquidity falling?

As of 2026-05-01 09:49 UTC, reported liquidity was $22,009.96. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for had to take profits sir (HTTPS)?

Is HTTPS a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand meme token dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are actively monitoring positions. Absolutely not suitable for long-term investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. This token exhibits nearly every high-risk characteristic: extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, high concentration, dominant sell pressure, and no fundamental value proposition.

What are the key risks of holding HTTPS?

Extreme liquidity risk: $22K pool vs $153K daily volume — severe slippage on exit • Heavy sell pressure: 80.3% of 24h volume is sells; 792 sellers vs 338 buyers • Supply concentration: top 10 (ex-LP) hold ~26% — coordinated dump risk