HTTPS

had to take profits sir Price Today & AI Analysis

HTTPS
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of May 1, 2026

7sGdNQSvUGpahh6qyXB3g5gsdK9FAzZM299KyCXspump

$0.047587

+1.32%

FDV $75,826

LiveContract:7sGdNQSvUGpahh6qyXB3g5gsdK9FAzZM299KyCXspumpChain:SolanaHolders:3,935Market cap:$75,826

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about HTTPS

Report snapshotas of May 1, 09:49 AM
FDV

$35,935

Liquidity

$22,010

Holders

2,767

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

HTTPS ('had to take profits sir') is a Pump.fun-launched meme token on Solana with mint address 7sGdNQSvUGpahh6qyXB3g5gsdK9FAzZM299KyCXspump. The token has experienced a dramatic 359% price surge in the past 24 hours, currently trading at ~$0.0000359. Despite the explosive price action, on-chain data reveals severe sell pressure (80.3% sell volume), extremely shallow liquidity ($22K), and heavy supply concentration (top 10 holders control 53.92%). The token name itself — 'had to take profits sir' — is a self-referential meme that ironically foreshadows the dominant market behavior observed.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
359%+ 24h price surge driven by speculative meme momentum
Extreme sell pressure: 80.3% of 24h volume is sells ($123.36K vs $30.27K buys)
Top 10 holders control 53.92% of supply; top 100 control 92.23%
Zero snipers detected in first 1,000 blocks — no early sniper concentration risk
Only $22K total liquidity on PumpSwap — extremely shallow market depth
Holder base was declining for most of the prior 30 days before a 24h spike of +128

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token is showing severe short-term exhaustion. The 1h price change is already -14.3% despite a 369% 24h gain. Sell pressure dominates at 80.3% of volume. With only $22K in liquidity, any moderate sell order will cause significant slippage. The candle structure shows the price spiked to a high near $0.0000354 (candle [1] low, which appears to be a data anomaly — see technical analysis) and is now pulling back. Short-term direction is bearish with high probability of continued retracement.

Target low$0.000009
Target high$0.000045
Support: $0.0000098 (recent consolidation base, candles [1]–[7]), $0.0000087 (pre-pump level, candles [9]–[11]), $0.0000078 (30-day low, candle [14])
Resistance: $0.0000360 (current price / 24h high zone), $0.0000354 (candle [1] low — likely intraday spike high), $0.0000306 (candle [2] low)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

Medium-term outlook is bearish. The holder base was in a slow decline for most of April 2026 (from 2,733 on Apr 1 to 2,640 on Apr 30), suggesting organic interest was waning before this pump. Meme tokens with this profile — shallow liquidity, high concentration, dominant sell pressure — typically retrace 70–95% of pump gains within days to weeks. Sustained recovery would require new catalysts and meaningful liquidity injection.

Catalysts
  • Viral social media attention driving new buyer inflow
  • Listing on a centralized exchange (unlikely given current metrics)
  • Broader Solana meme season momentum
  • Coordinated community effort to build utility or narrative

Bullish factors

  • Strong 24h momentum (+359%) may attract additional speculative buyers
  • Zero sniper concentration means no early whale dump overhang from snipers
  • Verified contract and not flagged as spam
  • 5m price change still positive (+1.46%) suggesting very short-term buying

Bearish factors

  • 80.3% sell pressure ($123.36K sells vs $30.27K buys) in 24h
  • Only $22K total liquidity — extreme slippage risk on any meaningful exit
  • Top 10 holders control 53.92% — concentrated supply creates dump risk
  • Holder count was declining for most of April before this pump
  • -14.3% in the last 1 hour signals momentum reversal
  • Token name itself ('had to take profits sir') signals sell-oriented community sentiment
  • FDV of only $35–42K suggests minimal institutional interest
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extreme volatility (359% 24h move), very shallow liquidity ($22K), and the meme-driven nature of price action which is inherently unpredictable. OHLC data shows some anomalies (Low values higher than Open/Close in several candles) suggesting data quality issues that further reduce predictive confidence.

Deep Analysis

The 14 hourly candles reveal a dramatic pump event beginning around candle [7] (03:00 UTC May 1). Candles [9]–[14] (Apr 30) show extremely low-volume price discovery in the $0.0000078–$0.0000087 range with near-zero volume (0.5–51 USD), indicating the token was essentially dormant. Candles [1]–[7] (May 1) show a sudden explosion in volume and price. NOTE: The OHLC data appears to have Low and High values inverted in several candles (e.g., candle [1]: O=$0.00000919, H=$0.00000980, L=$0.0000354, C=$0.00000980 — the Low is higher than the High), suggesting the data feed may have the High/Low fields swapped or there is a data quality issue. Interpreting the larger values as the intraday spike highs: the token reached approximately $0.0000354 in candle [1] and $0.0000306 in candle [2], with the open/close oscillating between ~$0.0000092 and $0.0000098. Volume peaked at $106,358 in candle [6] (04:00 UTC) and has been declining since, suggesting the pump climax has passed.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 20%Sell 80%

Short-term trend is turning bearish after the pump climax. The 1h change of -14.3% and declining volume from the $106K peak in candle [6] to $2,628 in candle [1] confirm momentum is fading. Medium-term trend remains down given the 30-day holder decline and pre-pump price stagnation around $0.0000078–$0.0000087.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000098 (recent open/close consolidation base in candles [1]–[7])
Major$0.0000078 (pre-pump floor, candle [14])
Resistance
Immediate$0.0000360 (current price / recent spike zone)
Major$0.0000354 (intraday spike high from candle [1] low field, interpreted as spike peak)

The key support cluster sits between $0.0000087–$0.0000098, which was the consolidation range during the pump initiation. A break below $0.0000087 would signal a full retracement to pre-pump levels around $0.0000078. Resistance is thin given the shallow liquidity; the $0.0000354–$0.0000306 zone represents the spike highs that will be difficult to reclaim without fresh volume.

Notable patterns

  • Volume climax at candle [6] ($106K) followed by sharp volume decline — classic pump exhaustion pattern
  • Price oscillating between two tight levels ($0.0000092 and $0.0000098) in candles [1]–[7] while spike highs were reached — suggests wash trading or bot activity
  • Pre-pump dormancy: 6 consecutive candles (Apr 30) with volume under $52 USD — token was essentially dead before the pump
  • Declining volume with elevated price = bearish divergence
  • Possible data anomaly: Low > High in multiple candles suggests OHLC feed inversion

Total holders2,767
24h Δ+4.6
7d Δ+3.9
30d Δ+1.3
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The 24h holder spike of +128 (4.60%) is clearly correlated with the 359% price pump — new buyers are entering attracted by the price action. However, this is likely FOMO-driven rather than organic growth. The prior 30-day trend was net negative: from 2,733 holders on Apr 1 to 2,640 on Apr 30 (a loss of ~93 holders), with consistent daily declines throughout most of April. The 7d growth of +109 (3.90%) is almost entirely attributable to the last 24h pump.

Holder growth is technically accelerating in the very short term due to the pump, but the underlying 30-day trend was declining. From April 1–30, the token lost approximately 93 net holders, with 20 out of 30 days showing negative or flat holder change. The largest single-day declines were -19 (Apr 21) and -13 (Apr 20). The current 24h spike of +128 holders reverses this trend temporarily, but if price retraces, many of these FOMO buyers are likely to exit, potentially resuming the downtrend. The acquisition breakdown (2,477 via swap, 215 via transfer, 75 via airdrop) confirms this is primarily a trading-driven holder base.

Top 10 hold53.92%
Top 100 hold92.23%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

AmK2hPHoHktE2tcJWKbfMpYR3JiMdS3J19xGdHX4ZCLK

DEX liquidity pool — this address matches the PumpSwap pair address listed in the price data

27.98%

9UcaW8ncMSBWEp597FAZbuydAWtqojVs47EnSpSKrtPV

Individual whale or early accumulator

6.03%

HNG3RK3mALh2WWhi49t3Z4geBUctLufVyJtGQcSnds26

Individual whale or early accumulator

5.10%

59FZewgJRpX7VTu2jJfrVz1Fmu2XmjBCikaiofi7AeVm

Individual whale or early accumulator

3.30%

BU3hbLnVTeuKkGNs25fm6Q2MpAoZWYJ96SdqCSjaSXHY

Individual whale or early accumulator

3.03%

Supply concentration is extreme. The top 10 holders control 53.92% and the top 100 control 92.23% of the total supply of ~999.8M tokens. The largest single holder (27.98%, address AmK2hPHoHktE2tcJWKbfMpYR3JiMdS3J19xGdHX4ZCLK) is the PumpSwap liquidity pool pair address — this is protocol-held liquidity, not a whale. Excluding the LP, the next 9 holders control approximately 25.94% of supply. Holders #2 through #5 each hold 3–6% of supply, representing significant individual concentration. The overall sentiment is distributing, consistent with the 80.3% sell pressure observed in trading analytics. The 'whales' category (116 wallets) in the distribution breakdown further confirms a small number of large holders dominate the token.

Liquidity$22,010
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$30,270
Sell$123,360
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers338
Unique sellers792

Market health is critically poor. Total liquidity of $22K is dangerously shallow relative to the 24h trading volume of ~$153K — a liquidity-to-volume ratio of roughly 0.14x. This means the pool is being churned at over 7x its depth daily, creating extreme slippage risk for any position of meaningful size. The net flow is strongly negative: $123.36K in sell volume vs $30.27K in buy volume represents an 80.3% sell dominance. Unique sellers (792) outnumber unique buyers (338) by 2.3:1. The token trades on PumpSwap (pair AmK2hPHoHktE2tcJWKbfMpYR3JiMdS3J19xGdHX4ZCLK), a relatively low-liquidity venue. Any holder attempting to exit a position larger than a few hundred dollars will face significant price impact. The FDV discrepancy between the price data ($35,934) and trading analytics ($42,480) suggests price volatility during data collection.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,820,486.076526
FDV$35,934.58

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token has a total supply of ~999.82M tokens (standard Pump.fun 1B supply with minor burns or precision). The FDV is approximately $35,934–$42,480 depending on the price snapshot. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and the token is marked as 'mutable: false' and 'master edition: false'. Since the update authority is unknown and not explicitly a burn address (e.g., 11111...1111), we cannot confirm whether mint or freeze authorities have been renounced. The token is verified and not flagged as spam, which is a minor positive. The Pump.fun launch mechanism typically burns mint authority upon graduation, but this cannot be confirmed from the provided data. Investors should verify authority status independently on-chain before committing capital.

Volatility
high

359% 24h price surge followed by -14.3% in the last hour. Extreme intraday volatility with price oscillating between $0.0000078 and $0.0000354+ within 24 hours. Meme token with no fundamental value anchor.

Liquidity
high

Only $22K total liquidity on PumpSwap. 24h volume of $153K is 7x the liquidity pool depth. Any sell order above a few hundred dollars will cause severe slippage. Exiting a meaningful position is extremely difficult without moving the market against yourself.

Concentration
high

Top 10 holders control 53.92% of supply (excluding LP: ~25.94% in 9 wallets). Top 100 control 92.23%. 116 'whale' wallets identified. A coordinated exit by even 2–3 top holders could collapse the price given the shallow liquidity.

SniperDump
low

Zero snipers detected in the first 1,000 blocks. This is the one positive risk signal — there is no early sniper overhang. However, this does not eliminate dump risk from other early accumulators who are clearly distributing (80.3% sell pressure).

Authority
medium

Update authority is listed as 'unknown'. Mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from available data. The token is marked mutable: false which is a positive signal, but authority renouncement cannot be verified without additional on-chain inspection.

Key risks

  • Extreme liquidity risk: $22K pool vs $153K daily volume — severe slippage on exit
  • Heavy sell pressure: 80.3% of 24h volume is sells; 792 sellers vs 338 buyers
  • Supply concentration: top 10 (ex-LP) hold ~26% — coordinated dump risk
  • 30-day holder decline prior to pump suggests weak organic community
  • Meme token with no described utility or roadmap
  • Token name itself signals sell sentiment ('had to take profits sir')
  • Unknown authority status — cannot confirm rug protection
  • Post-pump retracement risk: 70–95% drawdowns are common for similar tokens

Mitigating factors

  • Zero snipers in first 1,000 blocks — no early sniper dump overhang
  • Verified contract, not flagged as spam
  • Mutable: false — metadata cannot be changed
  • Active trading community (836 unique wallets in 24h)
  • Pump.fun launch mechanism provides some standardization
Suitable for: Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand meme token dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are actively monitoring positions. Absolutely not suitable for long-term investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. This token exhibits nearly every high-risk characteristic: extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, high concentration, dominant sell pressure, and no fundamental value proposition.

HTTPS is a high-risk, meme-driven speculative token on Solana that experienced a 359% pump in 24 hours. The investment case is almost entirely momentum-based with no fundamental underpinning. The token's own name ('had to take profits sir') ironically describes the dominant on-chain behavior. The risk/reward is extremely unfavorable for new entrants at current prices given the shallow liquidity, heavy sell pressure, and concentrated supply.

Bull case (low)

Viral meme momentum continues to attract new buyers, the community rallies around the self-aware token name, and the token achieves a higher FDV milestone (e.g., $100K–$500K) driven by social media virality.

  • Viral spread on Crypto Twitter/X driving FOMO buying
  • Broader Solana meme season with elevated risk appetite
  • Community coordination to hold and build narrative
  • New liquidity injection from larger buyers

Base case

Price consolidates and gradually retraces 50–70% of pump gains over the next 7–14 days, settling in the $0.000010–$0.000018 range as momentum fades and sellers continue to dominate. Holder count stabilizes but does not grow meaningfully.

  • Sell pressure remains dominant but not catastrophic
  • Some buyers continue to speculate on meme momentum
  • Liquidity pool is not fully drained
  • No major new catalysts emerge in either direction

Bear case (high)

Sell pressure overwhelms the shallow $22K liquidity pool, price retraces 80–95% of pump gains back to pre-pump levels ($0.0000078–$0.0000098), and the holder base resumes its prior declining trend.

  • 80.3% sell pressure already dominant in 24h data
  • Top holders distributing into pump momentum
  • Only $22K liquidity cannot absorb sustained selling
  • No fundamental value or utility to attract long-term holders
  • Historical holder decline throughout April 2026

GeneratedMay 1, 09:49 AM
Data freshnessData appears current as of approximately 09:00 UTC on May 1, 2026. Price data reflects a 24h window ending at this timestamp.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Solana on-chain token metadata (mint: 7sGdNQSvUGpahh6qyXB3g5gsdK9FAzZM299KyCXspump)
  • PumpSwap DEX pair data (AmK2hPHoHktE2tcJWKbfMpYR3JiMdS3J19xGdHX4ZCLK)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (14 candles, USD-denominated)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • Top 20 holder snapshot with balance data
  • 30-day daily historical holder count series
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks)
  • Token distribution breakdown (whales/sharks/dolphins/fish/octopus)

Limitations

  • OHLC data shows apparent High/Low field inversion in multiple candles, reducing technical analysis reliability
  • Update authority status is 'unknown' — cannot confirm mint/freeze authority renouncement
  • Sniper data is entirely absent (0 snipers) — cannot assess early smart money behavior beyond this fact
  • FDV discrepancy between metadata ($35,934) and trading analytics ($42,480) suggests price volatility during data collection
  • No social sentiment data, developer wallet identification, or vesting schedule information available
  • Meme token price action is inherently unpredictable and driven by social dynamics not captured in on-chain data alone
  • 30-day holder history only; longer-term context unavailable
  • No information on team identity, project roadmap, or tokenomics allocation

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, particularly meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,820,486.076526

Key Risks

Extreme liquidity risk: $22K pool vs $153K daily volume — severe slippage on exit
Heavy sell pressure: 80.3% of 24h volume is sells; 792 sellers vs 338 buyers
Supply concentration: top 10 (ex-LP) hold ~26% — coordinated dump risk
30-day holder decline prior to pump suggests weak organic community

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No snipers were detected in the first 1,000 blocks of this token's launch. This is a notable positive — it means there is no early sniper whale overhang that could dump on retail buyers. However, the absence of sniper data also means we cannot assess early smart money conviction. The dominant signal from trading analytics is strongly bearish: 792 unique sellers vs 338 unique buyers in 24h, with sell volume ($123.36K) dwarfing buy volume ($30.27K) by a 4:1 ratio. This suggests that whoever accumulated early is actively distributing into the pump.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

0% — zero snipers detected in the first 1,000 blocks

Distributing — the 4:1 sell-to-buy volume ratio and 2,630 sell transactions vs 1,473 buy transactions indicate early holders are aggressively taking profits into the pump, consistent with the token's own name ('had to take profits sir').

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for had to take profits sir (HTTPS)?

The token is showing severe short-term exhaustion. The 1h price change is already -14.3% despite a 369% 24h gain. Sell pressure dominates at 80.3% of volume. With only $22K in liquidity, any moderate sell order will cause significant slippage. The candle structure shows the price spiked to a high near $0.0000354 (candle [1] low, which appears to be a data anomaly — see technical analysis) and is now pulling back. Short-term direction is bearish with high probability of continued retracement. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000009 to $0.000045.

Is HTTPS a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who understand meme token dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are actively monitoring positions. Absolutely not suitable for long-term investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. This token exhibits nearly every high-risk characteristic: extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, high concentration, dominant sell pressure, and no fundamental value proposition.

How are HTTPS holders trending?

had to take profits sir currently has 2,767 holders and is growing (24h: 4.6, 7d: 3.9, 30d: 1.3). Holder growth is technically accelerating in the very short term due to the pump, but the underlying 30-day trend was declining. From April 1–30, the token lost approximately 93 net holders, with 20 out of 30 days showing negative or flat holder change. The largest single-day declines were -19 (Apr 21) and -13 (Apr 20). The current 24h spike of +128 holders reverses this trend temporarily, but if price retraces, many of these FOMO buyers are likely to exit, potentially resuming the downtrend. The acquisition breakdown (2,477 via swap, 215 via transfer, 75 via airdrop) confirms this is primarily a trading-driven holder base.

What does sniper activity look like for HTTPS?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding HTTPS?

Extreme liquidity risk: $22K pool vs $153K daily volume — severe slippage on exit • Heavy sell pressure: 80.3% of 24h volume is sells; 792 sellers vs 338 buyers • Supply concentration: top 10 (ex-LP) hold ~26% — coordinated dump risk

Track HTTPS