MarsCoin

MarsCoin Price Today & AI Analysis

MarsCoin
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 30, 2026

7pjoah1BbycgJffij2b58P55NiHDbMqdo7Y1Wrzxpump

$0.041281

+12.35%

FDV $12,507

LiveContract:7pjoah1BbycgJffij2b58P55NiHDbMqdo7Y1WrzxpumpChain:SolanaHolders:486Market cap:$12,507

More tokens on Solana

HypurrClaw

HypurrClaw

HypurrClaw

$0.0410451.1%
MC $10.4K
CatchCat

CatchCat

CatchCat

$0.0588513.5%
MC $8.8K
solly

solly

solly

$0.0411534.0%
MC $10.8K
MESA

MESA

Black Mesa Research Facility

$0.0001052.0%
MC $105.3K
hehe

hehe

hehe

$0.0009922.0%
MC $833.9K
STONK

STONK

STONK

$0.303648.5%
MC $258.92M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about MarsCoin

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jul 30, 08:17 AM
FDV

$78,330

Liquidity

$36,833

Holders

42

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

MarsCoin (MarsCoin) is an extremely early-stage, micro-cap Solana meme token launched on PumpSwap with a fully diluted valuation of ~$74–78K and only 42 total holders. The token exhibits severe supply concentration — the top holder alone controls 85.94% of supply — combined with overwhelming sell pressure (85.3% of 24h volume), a -16.2% 24h price decline, and only $36.83K in total liquidity. The token has no verified contract, no social links, no description, and an unrenounced update authority. These characteristics collectively place MarsCoin in the very high risk category.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Extreme supply concentration: single wallet holds 85.94% of total supply
Overwhelming sell pressure: 85.3% of 24h volume is sells ($311.66K sell vs $53.83K buy)
Micro-cap with only $36.83K liquidity and 42 holders
No social presence, no description, unverified contract, unrenounced update authority
Holder base grew 88% in 30 days but from a base of just 5 holders

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

Price is under severe short-term pressure. The most recent hourly candle (08:00 UTC) opened at $0.0001046, spiked to $0.0001443, then collapsed to close at $0.0000783 — a bearish shooting-star/wick pattern. The 5-minute change is -8.58% and 24h change is -16.2%. With 85.3% sell pressure and only $36.83K liquidity, further downside is likely in the near term.

Target low$0.000025
Target high$0.000105
Support: $0.0000622 (hourly candle [1] low), $0.0000259 (hourly candle [2] low)
Resistance: $0.0001030 (hourly candle [1] close / candle [2] close), $0.0001443 (hourly candle [1] high — recent spike top), $0.0001410 (hourly candle [2] high)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

The medium-term outlook is bearish. The token has no verified contract, no social links, no community infrastructure, and a single whale holding 85.94% of supply who could exit at any time. Holder count peaked at 54 on July 28 and dropped to 42 on July 29 (-12 holders, -29%). Sustained price appreciation requires new demand that is not evidenced in the data.

Catalysts
  • Any announcement of utility or project development (none currently visible)
  • Broader Solana meme-coin market rally
  • Whale wallet locking or burning supply
  • Listing on a centralized exchange (highly speculative at this stage)

Bullish factors

  • 1h price change of +105.4% shows the token can spike sharply on low liquidity
  • Holder count grew from 5 to 42 over 30 days (+88%), indicating some organic discovery
  • 24h buy count of 1,683 transactions shows active participation despite sell dominance

Bearish factors

  • 85.3% of 24h volume is sell pressure ($311.66K sells vs $53.83K buys)
  • -16.2% 24h price decline with -8.58% in the last 5 minutes
  • Single wallet holds 85.94% of supply — existential dump risk
  • Only $36.83K total liquidity — any moderate sell causes severe slippage
  • No social links, no description, unverified contract
  • Holder count fell from 54 to 42 (-12) in a single day on July 29
Confidence: low. Only two hourly OHLC candles are available, providing minimal technical history. The token is extremely illiquid ($36.83K liquidity), making price targets highly sensitive to single large trades. Sniper data is unavailable. Confidence is therefore low.

MarsCoin call history

Full track record →
Jul 30bearish
24h-28.1%
7d-82.8%
30d-77.8%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only two hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (07:00 UTC): O=$0.0000291, H=$0.0001410, L=$0.0000259, C=$0.0001029 — a strong bullish candle with a massive upper wick, suggesting a spike followed by partial pullback. Volume was very high at $306,579. Candle [1] (08:00 UTC): O=$0.0001046, H=$0.0001443, L=$0.0000622, C=$0.0000783 — opened near the prior close, made a new high, then sold off sharply to close near the lower third of the range. This is a classic bearish shooting-star / inverted hammer pattern on high relative volume ($39,279), confirming distribution after the spike.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 15%Sell 85%

The short-term trend is down: the most recent candle closed well below its open and below the prior candle's close, with a large upper wick indicating failed bullish momentum. Medium-term trend is sideways-to-down given the lack of sustained higher highs across the available data.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000622 (candle [1] low)
Major$0.0000259 (candle [2] low — recent absolute low)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0001030 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close)
Major$0.0001443 (candle [1] high — spike top)

The $0.0000622 level is the nearest support from the most recent candle's low. A break below this opens a path to the $0.0000259 level seen in candle [2]. On the upside, $0.0001030 is the first resistance (prior close), and $0.0001443 is the spike high that would need to be reclaimed for any bullish continuation.

Notable patterns

  • Bearish shooting star / inverted hammer on candle [1] — high wick, close in lower third of range
  • High-volume pump candle [2] followed by lower-volume distribution candle [1]
  • Price failed to hold above the candle [2] close, indicating bull trap characteristics
  • Massive upper wicks on both candles signal strong selling into strength

Total holders42
24h Δ+4.8
7d Δ+83
30d Δ+88
Accelerating Growth
No

Correlation with price

Holder growth spiked on July 28 (+44 holders, +81%) coinciding with the price pump visible in the OHLC data. However, July 29 saw an immediate reversal of -12 holders (-29%), suggesting the spike attracted short-term traders who quickly exited. This pattern — rapid holder accumulation followed by rapid departure — is typical of pump-and-dump dynamics rather than organic community growth.

The 30-day holder history reveals a token that was dormant at 5 holders from June 30 through July 6, then experienced sporadic spikes: +14 on July 8 (to 19), then decay back to 8 by July 10, then another spike to 54 on July 28, then collapse to 42 on July 29. Growth is NOT accelerating in a healthy sense — it is volatile and mean-reverting. The base of 5 holders for the first month of existence is a red flag. Current 42 holders is extremely low for any token seeking legitimacy. The top10 concentration of 102.4% (likely due to rounding or LP tokens counted) underscores that virtually all supply is in a handful of wallets.

Top 10 hold102.40%
Top 100 hold102.40%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

ESTk1i6UdA5FfuFyDwt65anH285tTMB8Q67HQK2XBzm

Dominant whale / likely project insider or team — holds 857.5M of ~993.4M total supply. This single wallet controls the token's fate entirely.

85.94%

4em1RJxBUAynBwtwifxMV4KAyKq2neHdJzA2FEcpajPn

Individual whale — second largest holder at 4.33%, likely an early buyer or secondary insider.

4.33%

J1XAE4onKYG1kTghgaytnyFgR3otQs1xEnJRRWM3djSQ

Individual whale — third largest holder at 4.05%, similar profile to holder #2.

4.05%

72LKgbeyzmZRM3xBgKHBSrPcgdb49LZq71rRzqgcEA5H

Individual whale — fourth largest at 3.50%.

3.50%

B4HpqF8sHpU7iGKz3rQmV2oWccDwpuChB9AYTFT7AoQj

Individual whale — fifth largest at 2.40%.

2.40%

Supply distribution is critically concentrated. The top holder alone controls 85.94% of supply (~857.5M tokens). The top 5 holders collectively control ~100.22% of supply (accounting for the 102.4% figure which likely includes LP-locked tokens or rounding). With only 42 total holders and this extreme concentration, a single sell decision by the top wallet would be catastrophic. The 85.3% sell pressure in the last 24 hours and the -12 holder drop on July 29 suggest distribution is already underway. No wallet has been identified as a DEX LP pool, burn address, or exchange — all top holders appear to be individual wallets.

Liquidity$36,830
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$53,830
Sell$311,660
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers385
Unique sellers1,846

Market health is critically poor. Total liquidity of $36.83K is extremely shallow relative to the $311.66K in 24h sell volume — meaning sellers are moving roughly 8.5x the available liquidity pool in a single day, causing severe price impact. The net flow is strongly negative (outflow): $311.66K sells vs $53.83K buys = net outflow of ~$257.83K. The seller-to-buyer ratio is 4.8:1 (1,846 sellers vs 385 buyers). Slippage risk is high — any trade above a few hundred dollars will move the price materially. The FDV of $74–78K vs $36.83K liquidity means liquidity represents ~50% of FDV, which sounds reasonable in isolation but is misleading given the extreme concentration and sell pressure. The PumpSwap pair (7oLDfykjJVDmR8ZKcgoehW6z4zhnBnGC8mGUFLhDHxxg) is the sole liquidity venue.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply993,381,684.18 tokens
FDV$74,240–$78,330 (range from trading analytics and metadata)

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The update authority is TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM — this is NOT the system program (11111...1) or a known burn address, meaning the token metadata is mutable by this authority. The token is marked as 'Mutable: false' in metadata, which partially mitigates metadata rug risk, but mint and freeze authority status are not explicitly provided in the data and cannot be confirmed as renounced. The token has no verified contract, no description, no social links, and no master edition. Total supply of ~993.4M tokens with 85.94% held by a single wallet means the effective circulating supply is only ~14% (~139M tokens). Rug risk from authorities is rated high due to unconfirmed authority renouncement and the unverified, anonymous nature of the project.

Volatility
high

Price swung from $0.0000259 to $0.0001443 and back to $0.0000783 within two hourly candles — an intraday range of ~457%. The 5-minute change is -8.58% and 24h is -16.2%. Extreme volatility on micro-cap liquidity.

Liquidity
high

Only $36.83K total liquidity on a single PumpSwap pool. Any trade above ~$500 will cause significant slippage. 24h sell volume of $311.66K is 8.5x the liquidity pool.

Concentration
high

Top holder controls 85.94% of supply (~857.5M tokens). Top 5 holders control ~100% of supply. With only 42 total holders, this is one of the most concentrated token distributions possible.

SniperDump
medium

No sniper data is available. However, the 85.3% sell pressure and 4.8:1 seller-to-buyer ratio suggest early participants are already dumping. The risk is elevated but cannot be precisely quantified without sniper data.

Authority
high

Update authority (TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM) is not renounced. Mint and freeze authority status are unknown. No verified contract. Token is unverified and anonymous with no social presence.

Key risks

  • Single wallet (ESTk1i6UdA5FfuFyDwt65anH285tTMB8Q67HQK2XBzm) holds 85.94% of supply — a single sell decision could collapse the price to near zero
  • 85.3% of 24h volume is sell pressure with net outflow of ~$257.83K
  • Only $36.83K liquidity — extreme slippage on any meaningful trade
  • Update authority not renounced — metadata/contract changes possible
  • No social links, no description, no verified contract — anonymous and unaccountable team
  • Holder count dropped 22% in one day (54→42 on July 29) indicating active exit
  • Token was dormant at 5 holders for the first month of existence

Mitigating factors

  • Token is marked 'Mutable: false' which limits some metadata manipulation
  • PumpSwap listing provides some baseline liquidity infrastructure
  • 24h buy count of 1,683 shows some active buyer interest
  • FDV is low (~$74–78K) meaning absolute loss exposure is limited for small positions
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of extreme concentration, overwhelming sell pressure, micro-cap liquidity, and anonymous/unverified team makes this one of the highest-risk token profiles possible.

MarsCoin is a micro-cap, anonymous Solana meme token with extreme supply concentration (85.94% in one wallet), overwhelming sell pressure (85.3% of volume), and only $36.83K in liquidity. There is no verifiable utility, team, or community infrastructure. The investment case is purely speculative and the risk of total loss is very high.

Bull case (low)

Viral meme momentum drives rapid holder and volume growth, the dominant whale holds or locks supply, and the token catches attention on social media — pushing FDV toward $500K–$1M range.

  • Broader Solana meme-coin market rally lifts all micro-caps
  • Dominant whale publicly commits to holding or burns supply
  • Organic viral spread on X/Twitter or Telegram
  • Low FDV ($74K) means small capital inflows have outsized price impact

Base case

The token continues to trade with extreme volatility and low liquidity, experiencing periodic pump-and-dump cycles driven by the small holder base. Price drifts lower over 30 days as sell pressure outweighs buying interest, settling at a fraction of current price.

  • Dominant whale does not immediately dump entire position
  • Some speculative buyers continue to enter on dips
  • No new utility, partnerships, or social catalysts emerge
  • Liquidity remains at current shallow levels

Bear case (high)

The dominant whale (85.94% of supply) begins selling into the thin $36.83K liquidity pool, collapsing the price by 80–99%. Remaining holders exit, liquidity is withdrawn, and the token goes to near zero.

  • Dominant whale exits — even selling 10% of their position would represent ~$6.7K against $36.83K liquidity
  • Continued 85.3% sell pressure exhausts buyer demand
  • No social presence or utility means no new buyer catalyst
  • Holder count already declining (-12 in one day on July 29)

GeneratedJul 30, 08:17 AM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of 2026-07-30T08:xx UTC. OHLC data covers the two most recent hourly candles (07:00 and 08:00 UTC on 2026-07-30). Holder history covers 2026-06-30 through 2026-07-29.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, authority, supply, decimals)
  • PumpSwap DEX trading analytics (volume, liquidity, buy/sell pressure)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (2 candles available)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data (top 20 holders, concentration)
  • Historical daily holder count series (30 days)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • No sniper data available — early buyer PnL and concentration cannot be assessed
  • Mint and freeze authority status not explicitly confirmed in provided data
  • No social or off-chain data available to assess community or team credibility
  • Micro-cap with $36.83K liquidity means price targets are highly unreliable
  • Top10 concentration of 102.4% suggests possible data anomaly (LP tokens or rounding) that could not be resolved with available data
  • Token name/symbol/description are unverified and provided by the token creator

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Investing in micro-cap meme tokens carries extreme risk of total loss. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analyst and platform bear no responsibility for investment outcomes based on this report.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply993,381,684.18 tokens

Key Risks

•Single wallet (ESTk1i6UdA5FfuFyDwt65anH285tTMB8Q67HQK2XBzm) holds 85.94% of supply — a single sell decision could collapse the price to near zero
•85.3% of 24h volume is sell pressure with net outflow of ~$257.83K
•Only $36.83K liquidity — extreme slippage on any meaningful trade
•Update authority not renounced — metadata/contract changes possible

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper data is available for MarsCoin. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper activity. What can be observed from on-chain holder data is that 85.3% of 24h volume is sell-side, with 1,846 unique sellers vs 385 unique buyers — a 4.8:1 seller-to-buyer ratio. This strongly suggests early holders and/or the dominant whale are distributing. The top holder at 85.94% of supply represents the single largest smart-money risk: if this wallet begins selling, the token would face catastrophic price impact given only $36.83K in liquidity.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available — the sniper analysis endpoint returned no data for this token.

Likely distributing — the 4.8:1 seller-to-buyer ratio and -16.2% 24h price decline suggest early participants are exiting. Holder count dropped from 54 to 42 (-12) in a single day on July 29, consistent with profit-taking or loss-cutting.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for MarsCoin (MarsCoin)?

Price is under severe short-term pressure. The most recent hourly candle (08:00 UTC) opened at $0.0001046, spiked to $0.0001443, then collapsed to close at $0.0000783 — a bearish shooting-star/wick pattern. The 5-minute change is -8.58% and 24h change is -16.2%. With 85.3% sell pressure and only $36.83K liquidity, further downside is likely in the near term. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000025 to $0.000105.

Is MarsCoin a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of extreme concentration, overwhelming sell pressure, micro-cap liquidity, and anonymous/unverified team makes this one of the highest-risk token profiles possible.

How are MarsCoin holders trending?

MarsCoin currently has 42 holders and is growing (24h: 4.8, 7d: 83, 30d: 88). The 30-day holder history reveals a token that was dormant at 5 holders from June 30 through July 6, then experienced sporadic spikes: +14 on July 8 (to 19), then decay back to 8 by July 10, then another spike to 54 on July 28, then collapse to 42 on July 29. Growth is NOT accelerating in a healthy sense — it is volatile and mean-reverting. The base of 5 holders for the first month of existence is a red flag. Current 42 holders is extremely low for any token seeking legitimacy. The top10 concentration of 102.4% (likely due to rounding or LP tokens counted) underscores that virtually all supply is in a handful of wallets.

What does sniper activity look like for MarsCoin?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding MarsCoin?

Single wallet (ESTk1i6UdA5FfuFyDwt65anH285tTMB8Q67HQK2XBzm) holds 85.94% of supply — a single sell decision could collapse the price to near zero • 85.3% of 24h volume is sell pressure with net outflow of ~$257.83K • Only $36.83K liquidity — extreme slippage on any meaningful trade

← Back to all predictions

Track MarsCoin