How concentrated is Tung Thunker ownership?

Not measured: this report has no holder data.

Are large holders selling Tung Thunker?

Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.

Is Tung Thunker liquidity falling?

This report saved one reading, $45,706.88 (2026-08-14 18:49 UTC), and one reading can't show a trend.

Tung Thunker Price Today & AI Analysis

Q: Can I sell Tung Thunker (THUNKER)?

Yes. Every buy and sell pays a 3% transfer fee. Checked Nov 11, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

Q: Is THUNKER a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9/100. Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. This token is not appropriate for retail investors, conservative portfolios, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme token dynamics. Position sizing should be minimal (e.g., <0.5% of portfolio) if any exposure is taken at all.

THUNKERSolanaAnalysis as of Aug 14, 2026

$0.0₅3685

-18.80% 24h

Contract

Live

7cFG9Jj6sBq4oCejKynDfA65u2e2DtaTsWrMdUftprUt

Chain

Solana

Holders

275

Market cap

$3,569

At a $1M market cap, $THUNKER would be $0.001032 (280x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is THUNKER a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 11

Transfer fee

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks; every transfer pays a fixed 3% fee.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token blocks a sell

Transfer fee

3%Every buy and sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about THUNKER

3 free answers a day

Tung Thunker: holders, selling & liquidity

Saved with the report, 2026-08-14 18:49 UTC

Holder addresses

Not in this report

Top 10 supply share

Not in this report

Reported liquidity

$45,706.88

How concentrated is Tung Thunker ownership?: Not measured: this report has no holder data.
Are large holders selling Tung Thunker?: Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.
Is Tung Thunker liquidity falling?: This report saved one reading, $45,706.88 (2026-08-14 18:49 UTC), and one reading can't show a trend.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-08-14 18:49 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Aug 14, 06:49 PM UTC

FDV

$122,846

Liquidity

$45,706.88

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Tung Thunker (THUNKER) is a newly launched meme token on Solana, deployed via StonkFun and trading on Raydium. The token has experienced an extraordinary 763% price surge in the past 24 hours, rising from ~$0.0000127 to ~$0.0001266. Despite the dramatic price action, the token exhibits very shallow liquidity ($45.71K), heavy sell pressure (65.7% of volume), and an unverified contract — all hallmarks of a high-risk, speculative micro-cap. The update authority has not been renounced to a burn address, and the contract is mutable in terms of authority control.

Key points

763% 24h price surge from a very low base (~$0.000005 open 2 hours ago)
Extremely shallow liquidity at $45.71K vs $122.84K FDV — liquidity/FDV ratio under 40%
Heavy sell-side dominance: 65.7% sell pressure, 1,353 sells vs 925 buys in 24h
Launched on StonkFun — a permissionless launchpad with no vetting
No sniper data available; smart money signals are limited
Update authority not renounced — mutable risk present

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token has already surged ~763% in 24h, with the most recent hourly candle showing a high of $0.0001978 before pulling back to close at $0.0001266 — a significant wick rejection. Sell pressure dominates at 65.7% of volume. The 5m change of +5.46% and 1h change of +1.58% suggest momentum is fading. A retest of the $0.0000929 support (candle [1] low) or even the $0.0000173 range (candle [2] low) is plausible if selling continues.

Target low

$0.0000173

Target high

$0.0001978

Support: $0.0001087 (candle [1] open), $0.0000929 (candle [1] low), $0.0000173 (candle [2] low)
Resistance: $0.0001978 (candle [1] all-time high wick), $0.0001594 (candle [2] high)

Medium term · 1–7 days

bearish

Without sustained buying interest, new catalysts, or community growth, post-launch meme tokens of this type typically retrace 70–95% from peak. The shallow liquidity pool means even moderate sell orders will cause outsized price drops. Continued sell pressure and profit-taking from early buyers are the dominant medium-term risks.

Catalysts

Viral social media traction or influencer promotion could sustain momentum
Liquidity pool expansion would reduce slippage and attract larger buyers
Listing on aggregators or CEX would broaden exposure
Failure to attract new buyers will accelerate decline given sell-side dominance

Bullish factors

Explosive 763% 24h price appreciation signals strong initial demand
813 unique wallets traded in 24h — broad initial participation
5m price still positive (+5.46%), suggesting residual short-term momentum
Candle [2] to [3] shows a clear uptrend with higher highs and higher lows across the 3 available candles

Bearish factors

65.7% sell pressure — sellers significantly outnumber buyers by volume
1,353 sells vs 925 buys in 24h — more sell transactions than buy transactions
Candle [1] shows a long upper wick from $0.0001978 high to $0.0001266 close — rejection at highs
Liquidity of only $45.71K makes large exits extremely difficult without severe slippage
Unverified contract, StonkFun launchpad, update authority not renounced
6h and 24h price change both show 0% in analytics — possible data lag or stagnation at current level

Confidence: low. Only 3 hourly candles of OHLC data are available, no sniper data exists, holder distribution is unavailable, and the token is less than a day old. Price prediction confidence is inherently very low for such a nascent, illiquid asset.

THUNKER call history

Full track record →

Aug 14bearish@ $0.000127

24h-68.3%

7d—

30d-81.1%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 7cFG9J...prUt
Total Supply: 969,994,554.09

Key Risks

Extreme price volatility — 763% surge in <24h is unsustainable without fundamental support
Critically shallow liquidity ($45.71K) — large exits will crater the price
Heavy sell pressure dominance (65.7% of volume, 615 sellers vs 444 buyers)
Unverified contract launched on permissionless StonkFun launchpad

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle [3] (16:00 UTC): O=$0.000005991, H=$0.000041904, L=$0.000005991, C=$0.000037692 — a strong bullish candle with a close near the high, indicating explosive launch momentum. Candle [2] (17:00 UTC): O=$0.000040275, H=$0.000159358, L=$0.000017288, C=$0.000107963 — a wide-range bullish candle with a significant lower wick (shakeout to $0.0000173) and a strong close, showing continued buying but also volatility. Candle [1] (18:00 UTC): O=$0.000108698, H=$0.000197830, L=$0.000092854, C=$0.000126646 — a bearish candle relative to its high, with a prominent upper wick reaching $0.0001978 before closing at $0.0001266, signaling rejection at the top and potential exhaustion. The sequence shows three consecutive higher highs and higher lows, but the most recent candle's upper wick is a warning sign.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

The 3-candle sequence shows a clear short-term uptrend with higher highs ($0.0000419 → $0.0001594 → $0.0001978) and higher lows ($0.0000060 → $0.0000173 → $0.0000929). However, the most recent candle's rejection wick and dominant sell pressure suggest the uptrend may be losing steam.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

34%

Sell

66%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0001087 (candle [1] open / prior close area)

Major support

$0.0000173 (candle [2] low — shakeout wick)

Immediate resistance

$0.0001594 (candle [2] high)

Major resistance

$0.0001978 (candle [1] all-time high)

The $0.0001978 level represents the all-time high and a strong resistance zone given the rejection wick. Immediate support sits around the candle [1] open at $0.0001087. A break below $0.0000929 (candle [1] low) would be technically bearish and could accelerate selling toward the $0.0000173 shakeout low.

Notable patterns

Three consecutive higher highs and higher lows — short-term uptrend structure
Long upper wick on candle [1] — shooting star / rejection candle at all-time high
Volume climax on candle [2] followed by volume contraction on candle [3] — bearish volume divergence
Candle [2] lower wick shakeout to $0.0000173 before recovery — volatility trap pattern
Candle [3] (most recent) closes well below its high — potential exhaustion after parabolic move

Liquidity

$45,706.88

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically shallow at $45.71K against an FDV of $122.84K — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of approximately 37%. This means any moderately sized sell order will cause severe price impact. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: sell volume ($114.04K) is nearly double buy volume ($59.46K), with 615 unique sellers vs 444 unique buyers. Total 24h volume of ~$173.5K is nearly 4x the liquidity pool, indicating extremely high turnover relative to pool depth. Slippage risk is high for any position exceeding a few hundred dollars. The Raydium pair (EBhHVLDh1hsGLB5sRpcJzqG1fbYTd7SAJgQ9d7xdKG6d) is the sole liquidity venue identified.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

969,994,554.09

FDV

$122,845.70

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
763% price surge in under 24 hours from a near-zero base. Three hourly candles show price moving from $0.000006 to $0.000198 — a 33x move — before partial retracement. Extreme volatility is inherent to this asset class and stage.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of only $45.71K on a single Raydium pool. 24h volume of ~$173.5K is nearly 4x the pool size. Any position above a few hundred dollars faces severe slippage. Exit liquidity is extremely limited.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme price volatility — 763% surge in <24h is unsustainable without fundamental support
Critically shallow liquidity ($45.71K) — large exits will crater the price
Heavy sell pressure dominance (65.7% of volume, 615 sellers vs 444 buyers)
Unverified contract launched on permissionless StonkFun launchpad
Update authority not renounced — potential for future authority actions
Mint and freeze authority status unknown
No holder distribution data — concentration risk cannot be assessed
No sniper data — early buyer behavior is opaque
Volume declining on most recent candle despite new price high — bearish divergence
Single liquidity venue (one Raydium pool) — no diversified market depth

Mitigating factors

Token metadata is set to 'Mutable: false', limiting metadata manipulation
813 unique wallets traded in 24h — relatively broad initial participation for a micro-cap
Token is marked 'Possible spam: false' by the data provider
Active trading with 2,278 total transactions (925 buys + 1,353 sells) in 24h shows genuine market activity

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. This token is not appropriate for retail investors, conservative portfolios, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme token dynamics. Position sizing should be minimal (e.g., <0.5% of portfolio) if any exposure is taken at all.

THUNKER is a high-risk, speculative meme token in the earliest stage of its lifecycle. The 763% launch pump is impressive but is accompanied by severe structural weaknesses: shallow liquidity, dominant sell pressure, unverified contract, and unknown authority status. The investment case is almost entirely momentum-driven with no fundamental underpinning. The risk/reward is highly asymmetric and unfavorable for late entrants.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Viral momentum continuation: THUNKER gains social media traction, attracts new buyers, and liquidity deepens. The 813-wallet initial community grows rapidly, and the token establishes itself as a recognizable meme on Solana.

Sustained viral social media promotion drives new buyer inflows
Liquidity pool grows significantly, reducing slippage and enabling larger positions
Community forms around the 'Tung Thunker' meme concept
Influencer or KOL promotion amplifies reach beyond StonkFun's native audience
Short-term momentum traders pile in, creating a self-reinforcing price cycle

Base Case

Moderate retracement and stabilization: The initial pump fades, price retraces 50–70% from the $0.0001978 high to a range of $0.0000600–$0.0001000, where a small community of holders maintains minimal trading activity. The token survives but remains a micro-cap with negligible liquidity.

Some early buyers hold rather than fully exit, providing a price floor
New buyers continue to trickle in at lower prices, partially offsetting sell pressure
Liquidity pool remains intact and is not withdrawn by the deployer
No major negative catalysts (rug pull, authority exploit) materialize in the near term
Token maintains its Raydium listing and basic trading functionality

Bear Case

High probability

Classic pump-and-dump collapse: Early buyers continue distributing into retail demand, liquidity drains, and the price retraces 80–99% from its peak within days. The token becomes illiquid and effectively abandoned.

Sell volume already nearly double buy volume — distribution is underway
Shallow $45.71K liquidity cannot absorb sustained selling
No verified contract, no team doxxing, no roadmap — no fundamental floor
StonkFun launches have a high historical failure rate post-initial pump
Declining volume on the most recent candle signals fading momentum
Upper wick rejection at $0.0001978 suggests strong overhead supply

Analysis details

Generated

Aug 14, 06:49 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-08-14 18:49 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (Solana — Mint: 7cFG9Jj6sBq4oCejKynDfA65u2e2DtaTsWrMdUftprUt)
Raydium AMM pair data (EBhHVLDh1hsGLB5sRpcJzqG1fbYTd7SAJgQ9d7xdKG6d)
OHLC hourly candle data (3 candles, 2026-08-14 16:00–18:00 UTC)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets, transaction counts)
Price feed (USD and WSOL-denominated)

Limitations

Only 3 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
No holder distribution data — concentration and whale analysis are impossible
No sniper data available — early buyer behavior and smart money signals are opaque
Mint and freeze authority status not explicitly provided in metadata
Token is less than 24 hours old — all metrics reflect launch-phase dynamics only
No social metrics, community size, or off-chain data available
Single liquidity venue — no cross-market price validation possible
6h and 24h price change fields show 0% in analytics, which may indicate a data reporting artifact

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The analyst has no position in THUNKER. All data is sourced from on-chain records and third-party analytics providers and may contain errors or omissions. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research before making any investment decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Tung Thunker (THUNKER) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks; every transfer pays a fixed 3% fee. Checked Nov 11, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Tung Thunker (THUNKER)?

Yes. Every buy and sell pays a 3% transfer fee. Checked Nov 11, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

What is the short-term price outlook for Tung Thunker (THUNKER)?

Is THUNKER a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9/100. Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. This token is not appropriate for retail investors, conservative portfolios, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme token dynamics. Position sizing should be minimal (e.g., <0.5% of portfolio) if any exposure is taken at all.

What are the key risks of holding THUNKER?

Extreme price volatility — 763% surge in <24h is unsustainable without fundamental support • Critically shallow liquidity ($45.71K) — large exits will crater the price • Heavy sell pressure dominance (65.7% of volume, 615 sellers vs 444 buyers)