πŸŸ₯🟩

πŸŸ₯🟩πŸŸͺ🟦🟨🟧 Price Prediction 2026

πŸŸ₯🟩
Solanaβ€’
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 30, 2026

7BMCFNmTmV5rhPQB8amN77255ndYX5gbF7K9gnb6pump

$0.051902

+1.08%

FDV $1,898

LiveContract:7BMCFNmTmV5rhPQB8amN77255ndYX5gbF7K9gnb6pumpChain:SolanaHolders:271Market cap:$1,898

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about πŸŸ₯🟩

Report snapshotas of Jun 30, 07:18 PM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$45,290

Holders

1,102

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

This token (mint: 7BMCFNmTmV5rhPQB8amN77255ndYX5gbF7K9gnb6pump) is an emoji-named meme token on Solana with a total supply of exactly 1 token (0 decimals), trading on PumpSwap at ~$0.000137. It experienced a massive 149.6% price spike in the last 24 hours, but this is accompanied by extreme sell pressure (78.4% sell volume), very shallow liquidity ($45.29K), and deeply anomalous data β€” including a reported total supply of 1, top holder concentration of 0%, and a holder count that jumped from 42 (static for 30 days) to 1,102 in a single day. These anomalies strongly suggest data integrity issues, possible token manipulation, or a highly experimental/novelty token structure. The token is unverified, mutable, and has an unknown update authority.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Total supply of exactly 1 token with 0 decimals β€” an extreme rarity that makes standard holder/concentration metrics meaningless
Holder count was frozen at exactly 42 for 30 consecutive days, then exploded +1,060 (96%) in a single day β€” highly anomalous
149.6% price spike in 24h accompanied by 78.4% sell pressure and 8,181 sell transactions vs 1,695 buys
Liquidity is extremely shallow at $45.29K against a $136.68K FDV
Token metadata is mutable with unknown update authority β€” elevated rug risk

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token just spiked +149.6% but is under severe sell pressure (78.4% of 24h volume is sells, 8,181 sell txns vs 1,695 buys). The most recent hourly candle (19:00 UTC) shows a sharp reversal from H:$0.0001653 down to C:$0.0001367, a ~17% intra-candle drop. With only $45.29K in liquidity, any continued selling will cause rapid price deterioration. Short-term outlook is bearish.

Target low$0.000017
Target high$0.000165
Support: $0.000102 (hourly candle [1] low), $0.000017 (hourly candle [2] low)
Resistance: $0.000165 (hourly candle [1] high / candle [2] high cluster), $0.000160 (candle [2] close)

Medium term

bearish
1–7 days

Given the structural anomalies (supply of 1, mutable metadata, unknown authority, extreme sell pressure, shallow liquidity), the medium-term outlook is bearish. The token lacks any fundamental utility or verified project backing. The 30-day holder stagnation at 42 followed by a sudden spike is a classic pump pattern. Sustained price appreciation is unlikely without a credible catalyst.

Catalysts
  • Any credible project announcement or utility reveal
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Viral social media attention (Twitter/Moralis links present)

Bullish factors

  • 149.6% price gain in 24h shows speculative demand exists
  • Holder count grew +1,060 in 24h indicating new market participants
  • 5m price change of +5.3% and 1h of +33.4% show very recent momentum
  • Trading on PumpSwap with an active pair

Bearish factors

  • 78.4% of 24h volume ($302.87K) is sell volume vs only $83.59K buy volume
  • 8,181 sell transactions vs 1,695 buy transactions β€” 4.8x more sells than buys
  • Extremely shallow liquidity at $45.29K β€” high slippage risk
  • Token is mutable with unknown update authority β€” rug risk
  • 30 days of zero holder growth followed by sudden spike is a manipulation signal
  • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals is structurally bizarre and data-distorting
  • Unverified contract, no utility described, description is a single word ('epileptic')
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) only 2 hourly OHLC candles available, (2) total supply of 1 with 0 decimals makes standard price modeling inapplicable, (3) holder and concentration data is anomalous (0% top10/top100 concentration with 1,102 holders is mathematically inconsistent), (4) no sniper data available, and (5) the token's structure is highly unusual.

πŸŸ₯🟩 call history

Full track record β†’
Jun 30bearish
24h-97.3%
7d-98.1%
30d-98.6%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later β€” hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (18:00 UTC): O:$0.0000296, H:$0.0001649, L:$0.0000175, C:$0.0001609 β€” an enormous bullish candle with a massive range (~843% from low to high), indicating a violent pump from near-zero. Candle [1] (19:00 UTC): O:$0.0001596, H:$0.0001653, L:$0.0001024, C:$0.0001367 β€” opened near the prior close, made a marginal new high ($0.0001653), then sold off sharply to close at $0.0001367, forming a bearish shooting star / gravestone doji pattern. This is a classic pump-and-dump candle sequence.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 22%Sell 78%

Short-term trend has turned down after the pump candle, with the most recent candle closing well below its open and high. Medium-term is effectively sideways/unknown given only 2 candles of history and 30 days of near-zero activity prior.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000102 (candle [1] low)
Major$0.000017 (candle [2] low β€” the pre-pump base)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000160 (candle [2] close / candle [1] open zone)
Major$0.000165 (candle [1] and [2] shared high β€” double top)

The $0.0001653 level represents a double top formed across both candles and is the key resistance. The $0.000102 level is the most recent swing low and immediate support. A break below $0.000102 opens the path back toward the pre-pump base near $0.000017.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / bearish engulfing on candle [1] after the pump candle β€” classic reversal signal
  • Double top at ~$0.0001653 across candles [1] and [2]
  • Massive pump candle [2] with 843% range from low to high β€” characteristic of a coordinated pump
  • Volume collapse from $323K to $43K between consecutive candles β€” pump exhaustion signal

Total holders1,102
24h Ξ”+96
7d Ξ”+96
30d Ξ”+96
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The holder count was completely static at exactly 42 for all 30 days of historical data (June 1 – June 29, 2026), then exploded by +1,060 holders (+96%) in a single day coinciding with the 149.6% price pump. This is a near-perfect correlation between the price spike and holder growth, strongly suggesting the holder surge is driven by the pump event rather than organic adoption. The 30-day stagnation at exactly 42 holders is itself anomalous and may indicate the token was dormant or artificially held.

Holder data is deeply anomalous. The token sat at exactly 42 holders with zero net change for 30 consecutive days (May 31 – June 29, 2026). Then on June 30, holders jumped to 1,102 β€” a gain of +1,060 in one day. This coincides precisely with the price pump. The distribution data shows 0 whales, 0 sharks, 0 dolphins, 0 fish, 0 octopus, and top10/top100 concentration of 0% β€” which is mathematically impossible with 1,102 holders and is almost certainly a data artifact of the total supply being exactly 1 token with 0 decimals. These metrics should be treated as unreliable.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

No top holders data available

Data unavailable β€” top holders endpoint returned no results

0.00%

No top holder data is available from the data source. The reported top10 and top100 concentration of 0% is mathematically inconsistent with a token that has 1,102 holders and a total supply of 1 (with 0 decimals). This is almost certainly a data artifact caused by the unusual tokenomics (supply of 1, 0 decimals). In reality, with a supply of 1 indivisible token, a single address must hold 100% of the supply. The distribution health is classified as very_concentrated by definition. Whale map analysis is unreliable for this token structure.

Liquidity$45,290
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$83,590
Sell$302,870
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers726
Unique sellers2,435

Liquidity is extremely shallow at $45.29K against a $136.68K FDV β€” a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of only ~33%. This means large trades will cause severe slippage. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: $302.87K in sell volume vs $83.59K in buy volume represents a net outflow of ~$219.28K. There are 3.35x more unique sellers (2,435) than buyers (726), and 4.83x more sell transactions (8,181) than buy transactions (1,695). The market is in active distribution mode. The pair trades on PumpSwap (GLWqZoMkXQFG2EY8ujcN1iMiAYG4xD5dLt1dqMmckBWe). Market health is poor.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1 (with 0 decimals β€” a single indivisible token)
FDV$136.68K

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

This token has an extraordinarily unusual structure: a total supply of exactly 1 with 0 decimals, meaning there is a single indivisible unit. This makes all standard tokenomics metrics (holder concentration, distribution tiers, etc.) meaningless or misleading. The token is mutable with an unknown update authority β€” this is a significant red flag as the creator could modify token metadata at any time. Mint and freeze authority status are unknown. The token is unverified and not flagged as spam, but the description ('epileptic'), emoji-only name/symbol, and lack of any utility description suggest this is a novelty or meme token with no fundamental value proposition. The FDV of $136.68K is entirely speculative.

Volatility
high

149.6% price spike in 24h followed by a bearish reversal candle. The token pumped ~843% in a single hour. Extreme volatility with very thin liquidity amplifies price swings in both directions.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of only $45.29K. Any meaningful sell order will cause severe slippage. The liquidity-to-FDV ratio is ~33%, which is dangerously low for a token with active trading.

Concentration
high

With a total supply of 1 indivisible token, by definition one address holds 100% of the supply. Standard concentration metrics return 0% due to data artifacts, but the underlying reality is maximum concentration. Top holder data is unavailable.

SniperDump
medium

No sniper data is available. However, the 78.4% sell pressure, 8,181 sell transactions, and 3.35:1 seller-to-buyer ratio strongly suggest early participants are dumping into retail demand. Risk is elevated even without confirmed sniper data.

Authority
high

Token is mutable with unknown update authority. Mint and freeze authority status are unknown. The token is unverified. These factors create significant rug pull and metadata manipulation risk.

Key risks

  • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals creates extreme data distortion and makes the token structurally bizarre
  • Mutable token with unknown update authority β€” creator can modify metadata
  • 78.4% sell pressure with $302.87K in sells vs $83.59K in buys β€” active distribution
  • Only $45.29K liquidity β€” extreme slippage risk on any meaningful trade
  • 30 days of zero holder activity followed by sudden pump is a classic manipulation pattern
  • No verified contract, no utility, no credible project description
  • Holder count explosion (+1,060 in 1 day) coinciding with price pump suggests coordinated activity
  • 6h and 24h price change both show 0% in analytics despite 149.6% reported change β€” data inconsistency

Mitigating factors

  • Token is not flagged as spam by the data provider
  • Active trading pair exists on PumpSwap
  • Social links (Twitter, Moralis) are present, suggesting some public presence
  • Recent price momentum is positive (5m: +5.3%, 1h: +33.4%)
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme token risks. The structural anomalies, extreme sell pressure, shallow liquidity, and unknown authority status make this one of the highest-risk tokens analyzable.

This is a high-risk, speculative meme token with extreme structural anomalies. The only viable thesis is a short-term momentum trade, and even that is undermined by overwhelming sell pressure. The token's supply structure (1 token, 0 decimals), 30-day dormancy followed by a sudden pump, and unknown authority status make it unsuitable for any investment thesis beyond pure speculation.

Bull case (low)

Short-term momentum continuation: if the viral/meme narrative gains traction on social media and new buyers continue to enter, the token could retest its $0.0001653 high or push higher. Meme tokens on Solana have historically seen multiple pump waves.

  • Viral social media spread via Twitter/Moralis links
  • Broader Solana meme coin market momentum
  • Novelty of the emoji-only name and 'supply of 1' structure attracting speculative attention
  • Recent 1h momentum of +33.4% attracting momentum traders

Base case

Continued high volatility with gradual price erosion: the token maintains some speculative interest in the very short term but trends lower as sell pressure overwhelms buying. Price likely settles in the $0.000050–$0.000100 range within 24–48 hours barring new catalysts.

  • No new major catalyst or viral event
  • Sell pressure continues to dominate
  • Liquidity remains shallow
  • No rug pull or authority-based manipulation event

Bear case (high)

Rapid price collapse back toward pre-pump levels (~$0.000017–$0.000030): the overwhelming sell pressure (78.4% of volume), thin liquidity ($45.29K), and bearish reversal candle pattern suggest the pump is exhausting. A return to pre-pump prices would represent a ~88–88% decline from current levels.

  • 78.4% sell volume dominance with 8,181 sell transactions
  • 3.35:1 seller-to-buyer ratio indicating active distribution
  • Bearish shooting star candle pattern on the most recent hourly candle
  • Volume collapse from $323K to $43K between consecutive candles
  • Shallow liquidity amplifying downside moves
  • Unknown authority status creating rug pull risk

GeneratedJun 30, 07:18 PM
Data freshnessMost recent data point: 2026-06-30T19:00:00.000Z (hourly candle). Holder historical data through 2026-06-29. Data is current as of analysis time.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Solana on-chain metadata (mint, decimals, supply, authority)
  • PumpSwap DEX pair data (GLWqZoMkXQFG2EY8ujcN1iMiAYG4xD5dLt1dqMmckBWe)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, transaction counts, unique wallets)
  • OHLC candle data (hourly, 2 candles available)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available β€” insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals makes all concentration, distribution, and holder metrics unreliable or meaningless
  • No top holder data available β€” whale map analysis is severely limited
  • No sniper data available β€” smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper activity
  • Update authority is 'unknown' β€” cannot confirm or deny mint/freeze authority renouncement
  • 6h and 24h price change showing 0% in analytics contradicts the 149.6% reported 24h change β€” possible data inconsistency or reporting artifact
  • Historical holder data shows exactly 42 holders for 30 consecutive days with zero change β€” this may indicate a data collection issue rather than actual on-chain reality
  • The token's unusual structure (supply of 1) may cause systematic failures in standard analytics tools

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk of total loss. The data analyzed contains significant anomalies and inconsistencies that reduce analytical confidence. Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely. This analysis is based solely on the on-chain and market data provided and does not account for information not present in the dataset.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1 (with 0 decimals β€” a single indivisible token)

Key Risks

β€’Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals creates extreme data distortion and makes the token structurally bizarre
β€’Mutable token with unknown update authority β€” creator can modify metadata
β€’78.4% sell pressure with $302.87K in sells vs $83.59K in buys β€” active distribution
β€’Only $45.29K liquidity β€” extreme slippage risk on any meaningful trade

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper data is available for this token. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper activity. However, the broader trading data tells a concerning story: 8,181 sell transactions vs 1,695 buy transactions in 24h, with 2,435 unique sellers vs 726 unique buyers. This 3.35:1 seller-to-buyer ratio strongly suggests early participants or insiders are distributing into retail demand generated by the price pump.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available β€” sniper analysis endpoint returned no data.

Unknown from sniper data. However, the extreme sell pressure (78.4% of volume) and 3.35x more sellers than buyers suggests early buyers are actively exiting positions into the pump-driven retail demand.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for πŸŸ₯🟩πŸŸͺ🟦🟨🟧 (πŸŸ₯🟩)?

The token just spiked +149.6% but is under severe sell pressure (78.4% of 24h volume is sells, 8,181 sell txns vs 1,695 buys). The most recent hourly candle (19:00 UTC) shows a sharp reversal from H:$0.0001653 down to C:$0.0001367, a ~17% intra-candle drop. With only $45.29K in liquidity, any continued selling will cause rapid price deterioration. Short-term outlook is bearish. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000017 to $0.000165.

Is πŸŸ₯🟩 a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme token risks. The structural anomalies, extreme sell pressure, shallow liquidity, and unknown authority status make this one of the highest-risk tokens analyzable.

How are πŸŸ₯🟩 holders trending?

πŸŸ₯🟩πŸŸͺ🟦🟨🟧 currently has 1,102 holders and is growing (24h: 96, 7d: 96, 30d: 96). Holder data is deeply anomalous. The token sat at exactly 42 holders with zero net change for 30 consecutive days (May 31 – June 29, 2026). Then on June 30, holders jumped to 1,102 β€” a gain of +1,060 in one day. This coincides precisely with the price pump. The distribution data shows 0 whales, 0 sharks, 0 dolphins, 0 fish, 0 octopus, and top10/top100 concentration of 0% β€” which is mathematically impossible with 1,102 holders and is almost certainly a data artifact of the total supply being exactly 1 token with 0 decimals. These metrics should be treated as unreliable.

What does sniper activity look like for πŸŸ₯🟩?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding πŸŸ₯🟩?

Total supply of 1 with 0 decimals creates extreme data distortion and makes the token structurally bizarre β€’ Mutable token with unknown update authority β€” creator can modify metadata β€’ 78.4% sell pressure with $302.87K in sells vs $83.59K in buys β€” active distribution

Track πŸŸ₯🟩